Spacex's Falcon 1

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Spacex's Falcon 1 SpaceX’s Falcon 1: a History of Rocket Technology and an Interview with Guidance, Navigation, and Control Engineer Chris Wilkins By Jake Lee 2/10/19 Lee 1 Table of Contents Interviewer Release Form..…………………………………………………………2 Interviewee Release Form…………………………………………………………..3 Statement of Purpose………………………………………………………………..4 Biography…………………………………………………………………………...5 Historical Contextualization – Missiles, Duopoly, and the Falcon 1…………….…6 Interview Transcription……………………………………………………………22 Interview Analysis…………………………………………………………………32 Bibliography…...…………………………………………………………………..40 Appendix 1 – Additional Information…....………………………………………..43 Appendix 2 – Definitions……....…………………………………………………..44 Lee 2 Lee 3 Lee 4 Statement of Purpose I drew interest in writing about space travel and rocket science because space, astrophysics, and astronomy are all interests and passions of mine. The Falcon 1 specifically interested me because SpaceX is a very innovative and interesting company today and learning about its past seemed enticing. SpaceX is trying to make humans a spacefaring species, and the Falcon 1 was where this mission began. Lee 5 Biography Chris Wilkins was born in 1982 outside of New York City. Since then he has moved to many places all over the United States, and he currently lives in the DC area. He grew up during the Gulf War and, in the 1990s, lived in Cincinnati and Morgantown, West Virginia. He went camping every year near a winery in upstate New York where he remembers liking the grape juice. In high school, he took many AP classes and decided that he wanted to study engineering in college. He applied to early admission at RPI Polytechnic/NYU Poly and was admitted. He studied there for undergrad and majored in Aerospace Engineering, as well studying abroad in Germany where he met his current wife. He later found a professor in downtown Brooklyn who researched spacecraft at Polytechnic University and went to grad school there. He researched spacecraft dynamics under this professor for graduate research. As part of a fellowship, he taught high school physics and loved teaching. After earning his masters, his advisor wanted him to get a PhD, but his friend was an intern at SpaceX and told him to do an internship there. He was interviewed by Elon Musk and accepted. Later on, he got a full-time job working as a guidance, navigation, and control engineer at SpaceX and has been working there for 13 years. Lee 6 Missiles, Duopoly, and the Falcon 1 Many of the most successful space launch vehicles, such as the Atlas and R-7, were initially designed as ballistic missiles.1 Through the development of ballistic missiles and other rocket-powered weapons during wartime, space travel technology significantly advanced. This paper broadly discusses rocket development during World War I, World War II, and the Cold War. This paper focuses on the development of the Falcon 1 rocket by SpaceX and its related motors and parts. For the most part this takes place in the US but some early rocket development takes place in Germany. The Falcon 1 was developed in the late 2000s. To understand the Falcon 1, one must examine World War I, World War II, and the Cold War, as well as gain a first-hand perspective from someone who was there The rocket technologies in the Falcon 1 are based off of a long history of wars and weapons development that started in World War I. World War I began on July 28th, 1914, with the United Kingdom, France, and Russia siding against Germany and Austria-Hungary. Wanting to continue the American policy of isolationism, Woodrow Wilson, president of the United States, declared neutrality in the war. Even though America was not part of the early stages of the war, American businesses experienced massive success because the European industry was in disarray. In early 1917, the United States intercepted the Zimmermann Note, which was sent from a desperate Germany to Mexico; because it asked Mexico to attack the United States if they joined the Allies in the war, it led America to view Germany as hostile and enter the war on April 2, 1917.2 1 GILMAN, LARRY. "Ballistic Missiles." In Encyclopedia of Espionage, Intelligence and Security, edited by K. Lee Lerner and Brenda Wilmoth Lerner, 87-91. Vol. 1. Detroit, MI: Gale, 2004. Global Issues in Context (accessed October 30, 2018). http://link.galegroup.com/apps/doc/CX3403300068/GIC?u=standy&sid=GIC&xid=09a2d284. 2 "World War I and America." In Gale U.S. History in Context. Detroit, MI: Gale, 2018. U.S. History in Context (accessed February 5, 2019). Lee 7 Despite America not entering World War I until 1917, the entirety of the war from 1914 to 1918 kick-started American rocket research and shaped the beginning of Robert H. Goddard’s, commonly considered to be the father of American rocket science, career. Robert H. Goddard was born in 1882 and a professor of physics at Clark University in Massachusetts. Sponsored by the Smithsonian Institution and US Signal Corps to make rockets for use in warfare, Goddard began his research in 1914 at Clark University; this initial step forward resulted in the basic inventions and proofs needed for space travel, as well as powerful weapons still in use today. Later in 1914, Goddard designed the first multistage rockets, and in 1915, he proved that rocket engines would work in a vacuum. By the end of his research in 1918, Goddard had invented both the bazooka and anti-aircraft rockets.3 During this early research and throughout most of his lifetime, Goddard used gasoline as his fuel of choice for his rockets because it was easy to obtain and its combustive properties were well known.4 Meanwhile, the United States was fully engaged in World War I. In May, 1917, the Selective Service Act was passed; it dictated that males between the ages of 21 and 30 were required to serve in the military when drafted, increasing the size of the military from 400,000 to 4,000,000 men. In June, 1917, America began to send soldiers to France in order to fight at the front of the war. Although American soldiers did not fight in the war until the Spring of 1918, the Allies were able to declare victory on November 11, 1918. America’s involvement in the 3 Pendray, G. Edward. "Pioneer Rocket Development in the United States." Technology and Culture 4, no. 4 (1963): 384-92. doi:10.2307/3101375. 4 John D. Clark, Ignition! : an Informal History of Liquid Rocket Propellants (New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 1972), 5. Lee 8 war resulted in 116,000 casualties and 250,000 injured. America also emerged with a booming economy, a new sense of nationalism and patriotism from propaganda produced during the war, an increase in women’s rights, and newfound respect from allied nations. The war also led to a new American culture, causing the postwar period to be called the “Roaring Twenties” - a time of resurgence in all forms of art.5 After World War I and his contract with the military ended, Goddard decided to continue his research in private in order to make his lifelong dream of space travel a reality, and in 1919, Goddard published his first paper on rockets, A Method of Reaching Extreme Altitudes, that included the first appearance of the rocket equations in the United States.6 In 1920, Goddard invented liquid propellant rockets, and up until 1925, he experimented profusely with them; by March 16, 1926 in Auburn, Massachusetts, Goddard successfully launched a liquid propellant rocket, which traveled 184 ft in 2.5 seconds, and became the first in history to do so. On July 17, 1929, Goddard launched the first instruments to be transported on a rocket: a barometer and a thermometer. Although it did not travel higher that 90 ft, its crash gave him a great amount of publicity and caused the Massachusetts Fire Marshal to ban him from testing rockets in the state. This attracted the attention of pilot Col. Charles Lindbergh who convinced the wealthy Guggenheim family, already pioneers of aviation, to fund Goddard. With this money, Goddard purchased and moved to a facility in Roswell, New Mexico, where he would spend the rest of his life researching. Between 1930 and 1941, Goddard experimented intensely with rockets to satisfy his own interest in space travel, putting thousands of ideas to the test; during this period, Goddard invented hundreds of rocket-flight related technologies, including gyro stabilizers and 5 "World War I and America." In Gale U.S. History in Context. 6 See Appendix 1 Lee 9 deflector veins.7 Although Goddard’s research was advancing quite smoothly, rocket propellant research in the United States made only one major advancement in this time; from 1932 to 1934 at the University of Syracuse, Harry W. Bull experimented with the first monopropellants8, the most successful being kerosine, ether, and hydrogen peroxide, all of which would become successful fuels in future rocket designs.9 While Goddard was researching rocket technology, America was struggling with the Great Depression. On October 29, 1929, the stock market crashed, causing the banking system to collapse and companies to fire masses of workers in hopes to save money. In 1930, 750,000 Americans were not being paid and 2,400,000 did not have jobs. In order to revitalize the economy, President Franklin D. Roosevelt created New Deal programs to offer jobs and financial aid to needy Americans. Despite most Americans struggling with the Great Depression, cinema and radio greatly advanced and surged in popularity.10 Meanwhile, European, and especially German, rocket technologies were advancing at a rapid rate and groundwork was being laid for World War II. In 1931, Friedrich Wilhelm Sander used Red Fuming Nitric Acid11 (RFNA) in some of his rocket propellant experiments, introducing the chemical to oxidizer research.
Recommended publications
  • Spacex Launch Manifest - a List of Upcoming Missions 25 Spacex Facilities 27 Dragon Overview 29 Falcon 9 Overview 31 45Th Space Wing Fact Sheet
    COTS 2 Mission Press Kit SpaceX/NASA Launch and Mission to Space Station CONTENTS 3 Mission Highlights 4 Mission Overview 6 Dragon Recovery Operations 7 Mission Objectives 9 Mission Timeline 11 Dragon Cargo Manifest 13 NASA Slides – Mission Profile, Rendezvous, Maneuvers, Re-Entry and Recovery 15 Overview of the International Space Station 17 Overview of NASA’s COTS Program 19 SpaceX Company Overview 21 SpaceX Leadership – Musk & Shotwell Bios 23 SpaceX Launch Manifest - A list of upcoming missions 25 SpaceX Facilities 27 Dragon Overview 29 Falcon 9 Overview 31 45th Space Wing Fact Sheet HIGH-RESOLUTION PHOTOS AND VIDEO SpaceX will post photos and video throughout the mission. High-Resolution photographs can be downloaded from: http://spacexlaunch.zenfolio.com Broadcast quality video can be downloaded from: https://vimeo.com/spacexlaunch/videos MORE RESOURCES ON THE WEB Mission updates will be posted to: For NASA coverage, visit: www.SpaceX.com http://www.nasa.gov/spacex www.twitter.com/elonmusk http://www.nasa.gov/nasatv www.twitter.com/spacex http://www.nasa.gov/station www.facebook.com/spacex www.youtube.com/spacex 1 WEBCAST INFORMATION The launch will be webcast live, with commentary from SpaceX corporate headquarters in Hawthorne, CA, at www.spacex.com. The webcast will begin approximately 40 minutes before launch. SpaceX hosts will provide information specific to the flight, an overview of the Falcon 9 rocket and Dragon spacecraft, and commentary on the launch and flight sequences. It will end when the Dragon spacecraft separates
    [Show full text]
  • IAC-17-D2.4.3 Page 1 of 18 IAC-17
    68th International Astronautical Congress (IAC), Adelaide, Australia, 25-29 September 2017. Copyright ©2017 by DLR-SART. Published by the IAF, with permission and released to the IAF to publish in all forms. IAC-17- D2.4.3 Evaluation of Future Ariane Reusable VTOL Booster stages Etienne Dumonta*, Sven Stapperta, Tobias Eckerb, Jascha Wilkena, Sebastian Karlb, Sven Krummena, Martin Sippela a Department of Space Launcher Systems Analysis (SART), Institute of Space Systems, German Aerospace Center (DLR), Robert Hooke Straße 7, 28359 Bremen, Germany b Department of Spacecraft, Institute of Aerodynamics and Flow Technology, German Aerospace Center (DLR), Bunsenstraße 10, 37073 Gottingen, Germany *[email protected] Abstract Reusability is anticipated to strongly impact the launch service market if sufficient reliability and low refurbishment costs can be achieved. DLR is performing an extensive study on return methods for a reusable booster stage for a future launch vehicle. The present study focuses on the vertical take-off and vertical landing (VTOL) method. First, a restitution of a flight of Falcon 9 is presented in order to assess the accuracy of the tools used. Then, the preliminary designs of different variants of a future Ariane launch vehicle with a reusable VTOL booster stage are described. The proposed launch vehicle is capable of launching a seven ton satellite into a geostationary transfer orbit (GTO) from the European spaceport in Kourou. Different stagings and propellants (LOx/LH2, LOx/LCH4, LOx/LC3H8, subcooled LOx/LCH4) are considered, evaluated and compared. First sizing of a broad range of launcher versions are based on structural index derived from existing stages.
    [Show full text]
  • Commercial Space Transportation Developments and Concepts: Vehicles, Technologies and Spaceports
    Commercial Space Transportation 2006 Commercial Space Transportation Developments and Concepts: Vehicles, Technologies and Spaceports January 2006 HQ003606.INDD 2006 U.S. Commercial Space Transportation Developments and Concepts About FAA/AST About the Office of Commercial Space Transportation The Federal Aviation Administration’s Office of Commercial Space Transportation (FAA/AST) licenses and regulates U.S. commercial space launch and reentry activity, as well as the operation of non-federal launch and reentry sites, as authorized by Executive Order 12465 and Title 49 United States Code, Subtitle IX, Chapter 701 (formerly the Commercial Space Launch Act). FAA/AST’s mission is to ensure public health and safety and the safety of property while protecting the national security and foreign policy interests of the United States during commercial launch and reentry operations. In addition, FAA/AST is directed to encour- age, facilitate, and promote commercial space launches and reentries. Additional information concerning commercial space transportation can be found on FAA/AST’s web site at http://ast.faa.gov. Federal Aviation Administration Office of Commercial Space Transportation i About FAA/AST 2006 U.S. Commercial Space Transportation Developments and Concepts NOTICE Use of trade names or names of manufacturers in this document does not constitute an official endorsement of such products or manufacturers, either expressed or implied, by the Federal Aviation Administration. ii Federal Aviation Administration Office of Commercial Space Transportation 2006 U.S. Commercial Space Transportation Developments and Concepts Contents Table of Contents Introduction . .1 Significant 2005 Events . .4 Space Competitions . .6 Expendable Launch Vehicles . .9 Current Expendable Launch Vehicle Systems . .9 Atlas 5 - Lockheed Martin Corporation .
    [Show full text]
  • 7. Operations
    7. Operations 7.1 Ground Operations The Exploration Systems Architecture Study (ESAS) team addressed the launch site integra- tion of the exploration systems. The team was fortunate to draw on expertise from members with historical and contemporary human space flight program experience including the Mercury, Gemini, Apollo, Skylab, Apollo Soyuz Test Project, Shuttle, and International Space Station (ISS) programs, as well as from members with ground operations experience reaching back to the Redstone, Jupiter, Pershing, and Titan launch vehicle programs. The team had a wealth of experience in both management and technical responsibilities and was able to draw on recent ground system concepts and other engineering products from the Orbital Space Plane (OSP) and Space Launch Initiative (SLI) programs, diverse X-vehicle projects, and leadership in NASA/Industry/Academia groups such as the Space Propulsion Synergy Team (SPST) and the Advanced Spaceport Technology Working Group (ASTWG). 7.1.1 Ground Operations Summary The physical and functional integration of the proposed exploration architecture elements will occur at the primary launch site at the NASA Kennedy Space Center (KSC). In order to support the ESAS recommendation of the use of a Shuttle-derived Cargo Launch Vehicle (CaLV) and a separate Crew Launch Vehicle (CLV) for lunar missions and the use of a CLV for ISS missions, KSC’s Launch Complex 39 facilities and ground equipment were selected for conversion. Ground-up replacement of the pads, assembly, refurbishment, and/or process- ing facilities was determined to be too costly and time-consuming to design, build, outfit, activate, and certify in a timely manner to support initial test flights leading to an operational CEV/CLV system by 2011.
    [Show full text]
  • Since Our Last SIA Member News Summary, Press Releases and Posts
    SIA PRESIDENT’S REPORT – MEMBER NEWS FOR OCT 2020 Since our last SIA Member News Summary, press releases and posts from many SIA Members including AGI, Blue Origin, Hawkeye 360, Inmarsat, Integrasys, Iridium, Kymeta, Lockheed Martin, OneWeb, Planet, SES, SpaceX, Spire, Telesat and XTAR have released news. Please see the summary of stories and postings below and click on the COMPANY LINK for more details. PLANET (above) On Oct 28th, Planet announced the successful launch of nine Flock 4e latest-generation SuperDove satellites onboard a Rocket Lab Electron rocket from New Zealand. The Flock 4e’ SuperDoves were deployed into an approximately 500 km, morning-crossing Sun Synchronous Orbit (SSO), joining the rest of the constellation providing medium-resolution Earth imagery with unprecedented coverage and frequency of update. The nine SuperDoves are equipped with 8 spectral bands that provide high image quality and accurate surface reflectance values for advanced algorithms and time-series analysis. Planet’s SuperDoves are also interoperable with publicly available imagery, like Copernicus’ Sentinel-2, enabling innovative applications and use cases. (Photo credit: Image courtesy of Planet and Rocket Lab) AGI On Oct 26th, Analytical Graphics Inc., (AGI) announced that AGI and Ansys, a leading innovator of engineering software, had entered into a definitive acquisition agreement. According to the terms of the agreement, Ansys would acquire AGI. The purchase price for the transaction, which is expected to close in Q4 of 2020 pending regulatory clearance, is $700 million. SPACEX On Oct 24th, SpaceX announced that a Falcon 9 rocket had launched 60 Starlink satellites to orbit from Space Launch Complex 40 (SLC-40) at Cape Canaveral Air Force Station in Florida.
    [Show full text]
  • Forecast of Upcoming Anniversaries -- September 2018
    FORECAST OF UPCOMING ANNIVERSARIES -- SEPTEMBER 2018 60 Years Ago - 1958 September 17: NASA-ARPA Manned Satellite Panel established. The NASA/Advanced Research Projects Agency Manned Satellite Panel was formed to draft plans for future manned spaceflight. Langley Research Center and Glenn (then Lewis) Research Center were the primary NASA centers involved. September 30: Last day of NACA operations, Washington, D.C. 55 Years Ago - 1963 September 18: Asset 1 launched to an altitude of 39 miles aboard a Thor rocket from Cape Canaveral, Fla. The first successful suborbital lifting body flight, the Asset vehicle served as a proof-of-concept for the idea of a reusable winged spacecraft. September 28: Transit V-B launched by Thor Ablestar at 12:09 p.m. PDT, from Vandenberg AFB. This Transit satellite was the first US satellite to be powered entirely by nuclear electric power (RTGs). 50 Years Ago - 1968 September 5: Zond 5 launched from Baikonur by Proton K, at 21:36 UTC. An unmanned precursor for Soviet circumlunar cosmonaut program, it was the first Soviet circumlunar flight to successfully reenter Earth’s atmosphere. 45 Years Ago – 1973 September 25: Skylab 2, with astronauts Bean, Garriott, and Lousma, splashes down in Pacific Ocean. Crew was retrieved by recovery ship USS New Orleans, 6:20 p.m., EDT. September 26: Concorde 02 flew from Orly Field, Paris France, to Dulles International Airport, Washington, DC, in 3 hours and 33 minutes. The flight was a new speed record for the route. September 27: Soyuz 12 launched aboard a Soyuz rocket from Baikonur at 12:18 UTC.
    [Show full text]
  • A Pictorial History of Rockets
    he mighty space rockets of today are the result A Pictorial Tof more than 2,000 years of invention, experi- mentation, and discovery. First by observation and inspiration and then by methodical research, the History of foundations for modern rocketry were laid. Rockets Building upon the experience of two millennia, new rockets will expand human presence in space back to the Moon and Mars. These new rockets will be versatile. They will support Earth orbital missions, such as the International Space Station, and off- world missions millions of kilometers from home. Already, travel to the stars is possible. Robotic spacecraft are on their way into interstellar space as you read this. Someday, they will be followed by human explorers. Often lost in the shadows of time, early rocket pioneers “pushed the envelope” by creating rocket- propelled devices for land, sea, air, and space. When the scientific principles governing motion were discovered, rockets graduated from toys and novelties to serious devices for commerce, war, travel, and research. This work led to many of the most amazing discoveries of our time. The vignettes that follow provide a small sampling of stories from the history of rockets. They form a rocket time line that includes critical developments and interesting sidelines. In some cases, one story leads to another, and in others, the stories are inter- esting diversions from the path. They portray the inspirations that ultimately led to us taking our first steps into outer space. NASA’s new Space Launch System (SLS), commercial launch systems, and the rockets that follow owe much of their success to the accomplishments presented here.
    [Show full text]
  • America's Greatest Projects and Their Engineers - VII
    America's Greatest Projects and Their Engineers - VII Course No: B05-005 Credit: 5 PDH Dominic Perrotta, P.E. Continuing Education and Development, Inc. 22 Stonewall Court Woodcliff Lake, NJ 076 77 P: (877) 322-5800 [email protected] America’s Greatest Projects & Their Engineers-Vol. VII The Apollo Project-Part 1 Preparing for Space Travel to the Moon Table of Contents I. Tragedy and Death Before the First Apollo Flight A. The Three Lives that Were Lost B. Investigation, Findings & Recommendations II. Beginning of the Man on the Moon Concept A. Plans to Land on the Moon B. Design Considerations and Decisions 1. Rockets – Launch Vehicles 2. Command/Service Module 3. Lunar Module III. NASA’s Objectives A. Unmanned Missions B. Manned Missions IV. Early Missions V. Apollo 7 Ready – First Manned Apollo Mission VI. Apollo 8 - Orbiting the Moon 1 I. Tragedy and Death Before the First Apollo Flight Everything seemed to be going well for the Apollo Project, the third in a series of space projects by the United States intended to place an American astronaut on the Moon before the end of the 1960’s decade. Apollo 1, known at that time as AS (Apollo Saturn)-204 would be the first manned spaceflight of the Apollo program, and would launch a few months after the flight of Gemini 12, which had occurred on 11 November 1966. Although Gemini 12 was a short duration flight, Pilot Buzz Aldrin had performed three extensive EVA’s (Extra Vehicular Activities), proving that Astronauts could work for long periods of time outside the spacecraft.
    [Show full text]
  • Falcon 1 User's Guide
    Falcon 1 Launch Vehicle Payload User’s Guide Rev 7 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction 4 1.1. Revision History 4 1.2. Purpose 6 1.3. Company Description 6 1.4. Falcon Program Overview 6 1.5. Mission Management 7 2. Falcon 1 Launch Vehicles 8 2.1. Overview 8 2.1.1. Falcon 1 9 2.1.2. Falcon 1e 11 2.2. Availability 12 2.3. Reliability 13 2.4. Performance 15 2.5. Pricing 16 2.6. Standard Services 16 2.7. Non‐standard Services 16 2.8. Vehicle Axes/Attitude Definitions 17 3. Requirements & Environments 18 3.1. Mass Properties 18 3.2. Payload Interfaces 19 3.2.1. Falcon Payload Attach Fittings 19 3.2.2. Test Fittings and Fitcheck Policy 19 3.2.3. Electrical Design Criteria 19 3.3. Documentation Requirements 21 3.4. Payload Environments 23 3.4.1. Transportation Environments 23 3.4.2. Humidity, Cleanliness and Thermal Control 23 3.4.3. Payload Air Conditioning 24 3.4.4. Launch and Flight Environments 24 4. Facilities 32 4.1. Headquarters – Hawthorne, California 32 4.2. Washington, DC 32 4.3. Test Facility ‐ Central Texas 32 4.4. Launch Site – Kwajalein Atoll 33 4.4.1. Processing Services and Equipment 33 5. Launch Operations 36 5.1. Launch Control Organization 36 5.2. Mission Integration 37 5.2.1. Payload Transport to Launch Site 38 5.2.2. Payload Integration 38 5.2.3. Example Flight Profiles 41 D000973 Rev Falcon 1 User’s Guide ‐ D000973 Rev. 7 Page | 3 6.
    [Show full text]
  • The European Launchers Between Commerce and Geopolitics
    The European Launchers between Commerce and Geopolitics Report 56 March 2016 Marco Aliberti Matteo Tugnoli Short title: ESPI Report 56 ISSN: 2218-0931 (print), 2076-6688 (online) Published in March 2016 Editor and publisher: European Space Policy Institute, ESPI Schwarzenbergplatz 6 • 1030 Vienna • Austria http://www.espi.or.at Tel. +43 1 7181118-0; Fax -99 Rights reserved – No part of this report may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or for any purpose with- out permission from ESPI. Citations and extracts to be published by other means are subject to mentioning “Source: ESPI Report 56; March 2016. All rights reserved” and sample transmission to ESPI before publishing. ESPI is not responsible for any losses, injury or damage caused to any person or property (including under contract, by negligence, product liability or otherwise) whether they may be direct or indirect, special, inciden- tal or consequential, resulting from the information contained in this publication. Design: Panthera.cc ESPI Report 56 2 March 2016 The European Launchers between Commerce and Geopolitics Table of Contents Executive Summary 5 1. Introduction 10 1.1 Access to Space at the Nexus of Commerce and Geopolitics 10 1.2 Objectives of the Report 12 1.3 Methodology and Structure 12 2. Access to Space in Europe 14 2.1 European Launchers: from Political Autonomy to Market Dominance 14 2.1.1 The Quest for European Independent Access to Space 14 2.1.3 European Launchers: the Current Family 16 2.1.3 The Working System: Launcher Strategy, Development and Exploitation 19 2.2 Preparing for the Future: the 2014 ESA Ministerial Council 22 2.2.1 The Path to the Ministerial 22 2.2.2 A Look at Europe’s Future Launchers and Infrastructure 26 2.2.3 A Revolution in Governance 30 3.
    [Show full text]
  • The Annual Compendium of Commercial Space Transportation: 2017
    Federal Aviation Administration The Annual Compendium of Commercial Space Transportation: 2017 January 2017 Annual Compendium of Commercial Space Transportation: 2017 i Contents About the FAA Office of Commercial Space Transportation The Federal Aviation Administration’s Office of Commercial Space Transportation (FAA AST) licenses and regulates U.S. commercial space launch and reentry activity, as well as the operation of non-federal launch and reentry sites, as authorized by Executive Order 12465 and Title 51 United States Code, Subtitle V, Chapter 509 (formerly the Commercial Space Launch Act). FAA AST’s mission is to ensure public health and safety and the safety of property while protecting the national security and foreign policy interests of the United States during commercial launch and reentry operations. In addition, FAA AST is directed to encourage, facilitate, and promote commercial space launches and reentries. Additional information concerning commercial space transportation can be found on FAA AST’s website: http://www.faa.gov/go/ast Cover art: Phil Smith, The Tauri Group (2017) Publication produced for FAA AST by The Tauri Group under contract. NOTICE Use of trade names or names of manufacturers in this document does not constitute an official endorsement of such products or manufacturers, either expressed or implied, by the Federal Aviation Administration. ii Annual Compendium of Commercial Space Transportation: 2017 GENERAL CONTENTS Executive Summary 1 Introduction 5 Launch Vehicles 9 Launch and Reentry Sites 21 Payloads 35 2016 Launch Events 39 2017 Annual Commercial Space Transportation Forecast 45 Space Transportation Law and Policy 83 Appendices 89 Orbital Launch Vehicle Fact Sheets 100 iii Contents DETAILED CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .
    [Show full text]
  • Spacex's Expanding Launch Manifest
    October 2013 SpaceX’s expanding launch manifest China’s growing military might Servicing satellites in space A PUBLICATION OF THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF AERONAUTICS AND ASTRONAUTICS SpaceX’s expanding launch manifest IT IS HARD TO FIND ANOTHER SPACE One of Brazil, and the Turkmensat 1 2012, the space docking feat had been launch services company with as di- for the Ministry of Communications of performed only by governments—the verse a customer base as Space Explo- Turkmenistan. U.S., Russia, and China. ration Technologies (SpaceX), because The SpaceX docking debunked there simply is none. No other com- A new market the myth that has prevailed since the pany even comes close. Founded only The move to begin launching to GEO launch of Sputnik in 1957, that space a dozen years ago by Elon Musk, is significant, because it opens up an travel can be undertaken only by na- SpaceX has managed to win launch entirely new and potentially lucrative tional governments because of the contracts from agencies, companies, market for SpaceX. It also puts the prohibitive costs and technological consortiums, laboratories, and univer- company into direct competition with challenges involved. sities in the U.S., Argentina, Brazil, commercial launch heavy hitters Ari- Teal Group believes it is that Canada, China, Germany, Malaysia, anespace of Europe with its Ariane mythology that has helped discourage Mexico, Peru, Taiwan, Thailand, Turk- 5ECA, U.S.-Russian joint venture Inter- more private investment in commercial menistan, and the Netherlands in a rel- national Launch Services with its Pro- spaceflight and the more robust growth atively short period.
    [Show full text]