Guide De Reconnaissance Des Habitats Forestiers Des Plantes Menacées Ou Vulnérables

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Guide De Reconnaissance Des Habitats Forestiers Des Plantes Menacées Ou Vulnérables Guide de reconnaissance des habitats forestiers des plantes menacées ou vulnérables CÔTE-NORD ET SAGUENAY–LAC-SAINT-JEAN 2009 Équipe de travail Édition : Direction de l’environnement et de la protection des forêts et Direction des communications Coordination : Pierre Petitclerc1 Rédaction : Line Couillard2, N��������orman Dig����nard3, J��acq������ues Lab���recq��ue2 et Pierre Petitclerc Collaboration : Sylvie Champagne1, Sylvie Delisle1, Nancy Dénommée4, Jean Deshaye5 , Suzanne Leblond1, Pierre Martineau6, Andrée Michaud3, Danièle Morin7, Claude Morneau8, V������������incent Piché2 et André Sabourin6 Analyse statistique : Bernard Tardif2 Géomatique : �������������Sophie Benoit2 et Danièle Pouliot1 Source principale des données : Centre de données sur le patrimoine naturel du Québec (CDPNQ)2 Révision linguistique : Pierre Bélanger3 et Sylvie Bourassa3 Révision scientifique : Jacques Cayouette9 et Pierre Grondin3 Photographes : Susan Aiken (Musée canadien de la nature), Rodolph Balej, ���������������Line Couillard, J������ean Gag��������������������������������non et Raymonde Pomerleau ����������(ministère du Développement durable, de l’Environnement et des Parcs), Frédéric Coursol (consultant en botanique), Nancy Dénommée (Parcs Canada), Norman Dignard, J��acques���������������������������� Duval, Claude Morneau et Pierre Petitclerc �����������������������������������������������������(ministère des Ressources naturelles et de la Faune), Emmet Judziewicz (University of Wisconsin Stevens Point), Ben Legler (University of Washington Herbarium), Scott A. Milburn (Midwest Natural Resources Inc.), Éric Savard (Sépaq Anticosti), Shu Suehiro (Jardin botanique du Japon), Mark Turner (Turner Photographics) 1 Direction de l’environnement et de la protection des forêts, ministère des Ressources naturelles et de la Faune 2 Direction du patrimoine écologique et des parcs, ministère du Développement durable, de l’Environnement et des Parcs 3 Direction de la recherche forestière, ministère des Ressources naturelles et de la Faune 4 Réserve de parc national du Canada de l’Archipel-de-Mingan, Parcs Canada 5 Botaniste consultant, Génivar 6 Botaniste consultant 7 Unité de gestion Sept-Îles–Havre-Saint-Pierre–Anticosti, ministère des Ressources naturelles et de la Faune 8 Direction des inventaires forestiers, ministère des Ressources naturelles et de la Faune 9 Centre de recherche sur les céréales et oléagineux, Agriculture et agroalimentaire Canada II CÔTE-NORD ET GUIDE DE RECONNAISSANCE DES HABITATS FORESTIERS SAGuenay–LAC-SAINT-JEAN DES PLANTES MENACÉES OU VULNÉRABLES Équipe de travail Photos (couverture) : Line Couillard, gauche, Pierre Petitclerc, haut droit, Norman Dignard, bas droit Illustrations : Carex glacialis et C. sychnocephala (illustrations tirées de Mackenzie 1940), Geum macrophyllum var. perincisum (illustrations tirées de Hitchcock et al. 1961, avec permission), Potamogeton pusillus subsp. gemmiparus (illustrations tirées de Britton et Brown 1913) Graphisme et montage : Diane Côté1 Impression : K2 impressions Citation recommandée : DIGNARD, N., P. PETITCLERC, J. LABRECQUE et L. COUILLARD, 2009. Guide de reconnaissance des habitats forestiers des plantes menacées ou vulnérables. Côte-Nord et Saguenay–Lac-Saint-Jean, Ministère des Ressources naturelles et de la Faune et ministère du Développement durable, de l’Environnement et des Parcs, 144 p. Ministère des Ressources naturelles et de la Faune Direction des communications 5700, 4e Avenue Ouest, bureau C-409 Québec (Québec) G1H 6R1 Téléphone : 418 627-8600 ou 1 866 CITOYEN (1 866 248-6936) Télécopieur : 418 643-0720 Courriel : [email protected] Site Internet : www.mrnf.gouv.qc.ca ©Gouvernement du Québec Ministère des Ressources naturelles et de la Faune, 2009 Dépôt légal – Bibliothèque et Archives nationales du Québec, 2009 ISBN : 978-2-551-23799-9 (version imprimée) ISBN : 978-2-550-55920-7 (version PDF) Code de diffusion : 2009-3015 Ce document, à tirage limité, peut aussi être consulté en format PDF dans le site Internet du Ministère : http://www.mrnf.gouv.qc.ca/forets/connaissances/ connaissances-activites-diversite.jsp GUIDE DE RECONNAISSANCE DES HABITATS FORESTIERS CÔTE-NORD ET III DES PLANTES MENACÉES OU VULNÉRABLES SAGuenay–LAC-SAINT-JEAN Note au lecteur Ce guide de reconnaissance des habitats forestiers des plantes menacées ou vulnérables couvre deux régions administratives : Côte-Nord et Saguenay– Lac-Saint-Jean. De façon générale, l’expression « plantes menacées ou vulnérables1 » se réfère à la fois aux espèces désignées menacées ou vulnérables en vertu de la Loi sur les espèces menacées ou vulnérables ainsi qu’aux espèces qui sont susceptibles de l’être selon la liste publiée dans la Gazette officielle du Québec. Ce guide, qui s’adresse principalement aux intervenants forestiers, a été réalisé dans le cadre d’une entente administrative conclue entre le ministère des Ressources naturelles et de la Faune (MRNF) et le ministère du Développement durable, de l’Environnement et des Parcs (MDDEP) responsable de la gestion de la flore menacée ou vulnérable du Québec. Par cette entente, ces deux ministères se sont engagés à travailler de concert pour que des mesures de protection soient appliquées à l’égard des sites forestiers où vivent des plantes menacées ou vulnérables, et ce, dans les limites des pouvoirs et des responsabilités qui leur sont conférés. 1 Une espèce est dite menacée lorsque sa disparition est appréhendée. Une espèce est dite vulnérable lorsque sa survie est précaire même si sa disparition n’est pas appréhendée. GUIDE DE RECONNAISSANCE DES HABITATS FORESTIERS CÔTE-NORD ET V DES PLANTES MENACÉES OU VULNÉRABLES SAGuenay–LAC-SAINT-JEAN Table des matières Introduction ��������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������.............................................................................................................................. 1 1. Le territoire ........................................................................................................................... 3 Le contexte écologique ...................................................................................................... 3 Le domaine de la sapinière à bouleau jaune .............................................................. 3 Le domaine de la sapinière à bouleau blanc .............................................................. 6 Le domaine de la pessière noire à mousses ............................................................. 10 Le domaine de la pessière noire à lichens ................................................................. 12 La flore menacée ou vulnérable �������������������������������������������������������������������������������������.................................................................................. 13 « Fille de l’eau et fille du feu » ......................................................................................... 13 Une flore particulière liée au calcaire .......................................................................... 14 Une répartition sporadique pour les autres éléments ......................................... 17 Les espèces associées aux milieux forestiers ........................................................... 18 Les mesures de protection .............................................................................................. 20 2. Les groupes d’espèces ............................................................................................... 21 Groupe I : plantes forestières menacées ou vulnérables à risque élevé .................... 21 Groupe II : plantes non forestières menacées ou vulnérables à risque .................. 21 Groupe III : plantes menacées ou vulnérables non à risque .................................. 23 3. Reconnaissance des habitats forestiers des espèces du groupe I ...... 25 4. Protection des habitats ............................................................................................... 35 5. Fiches d’identification des espèces des groupes I et II .............................. 36 Glossaire ................................................................................................................................. 120 Références ............................................................................................................................. 130 Annexes .................................................................................................................................. 139 Annexe A. Liste des plantes menacées ou vulnérables des régions de la Côte-Nord et du Saguenay–Lac-Saint-Jean ........................................... 140 Annexe B. Habitat floristique et écosystème forestier exceptionnel (catégorie refuge d’espèces menacées ou vulnérables) désignés dans les régions de la Côte-Nord et du Saguenay–Lac-Saint-Jean ............................................................................. 142 Annexe C. Signification des codes utilisés dans les tableaux 4 et 5 .................... 143 GUIDE DE RECONNAISSANCE DES HABITATS FORESTIERS CÔTE-NORD ET VII DES PLANTES MENACÉES OU VULNÉRABLES SAGuenay–LAC-SAINT-JEAN Introduction Le maintien de la diversité des espèces témoigne de la santé des écosystèmes et de leur bon fonctionnement. C’est de ce constat qu’a progressivement émergé le concept d’aménagement durable des forêts, dans lequel la préservation de la biodiversité, y compris celle des espèces en danger, occupe une place importante.
Recommended publications
  • Guide De Reconnaissance Des Habitats Forestiers Des Plantes Menacées Ou Vulnérables
    Guide de reconnaissance des habitats forestiers des plantes menacées ou vulnérables BAS-SAINT-LAURENT ET GASPÉSIE 2007 II Équipe de travail Édition : Direction de l’environnement forestier et Direction des communications Coordination : Pierre Petitclerc1 Rédaction : Line Couillard2, Norman Dignard3, Jacques Labrecque2, Gildo Lavoie2 et Pierre Petitclerc Collaboration : Lucille Bastien1, Jean-Pierre Berger4, André R. Bouchard1, Pierre Grondin3, Bruno Lévesque1, Andrée Michaud3 et Vincent Piché2 Géomatique : Danièle Pouliot1 Cartographie : Yves Lachance2 Révision linguistique : Marie-France LeBlanc (consultante) et Pierre Bélanger3 Photographes : Marco Bellavance, Agence régionale de mise en valeur des forêts privées du Bas-Saint-Laurent André R. Bouchard, ministère des Ressources naturelles et de la Faune Lina Breton, ministère des Ressources naturelles et de la Faune Line Couillard, ministère du Développement durable, de l’Environnement et des Parcs Frédéric Coursol, consultant Norman Dignard, ministère des Ressources naturelles et de la Faune Chris Evans (www.forestryimages.org) Donald Gunn, Royal Botanical Gardens (Ontario) William S. Justice (www.forestryimages.org) Scott A. Millburn, consultant Robert H. Mohlenbrock (plants.usda.gov) Sébastien Nadeau, Agence régionale de mise en valeur des forêts privées du Bas-Saint-Laurent Pierre Petitclerc, ministère des Ressources naturelles et de la Faune Benoît Toussaint, ministère des Ressources naturelles et de la Faune Benoît Tremblay, Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières Photos (couverture) : André R. Bouchard, gauche. Norman Dignard, haut droit. Pierre Petitclerc, bas droit. Conception graphique et montage : Bissonnette Communications Impact Impression : J. B. Deschamps Citation recommandée : PETITCLERC P., N. DIGNARD, L. COUILLARD, G. LAVOIE et J. LABRECQUE, 2007. Guide de reconnaissance des habitats forestiers des plantes menacées ou vulnérables.
    [Show full text]
  • Maine's Endangered and Threatened Plants
    University of Southern Maine USM Digital Commons Maine Collection 1990 Maine's Endangered and Threatened Plants Maine State Planning Office Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.usm.maine.edu/me_collection Part of the Biodiversity Commons, Botany Commons, Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Commons, Forest Biology Commons, Forest Management Commons, Other Forestry and Forest Sciences Commons, Plant Biology Commons, and the Weed Science Commons Recommended Citation Maine State Planning Office, "Maine's Endangered and Threatened Plants" (1990). Maine Collection. 49. https://digitalcommons.usm.maine.edu/me_collection/49 This Book is brought to you for free and open access by USM Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Maine Collection by an authorized administrator of USM Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. BACKGROUND and PURPOSE In an effort to encourage the protection of native Maine plants that are naturally reduced or low in number, the State Planning Office has compiled a list of endangered and threatened plants. Of Maine's approximately 1500 native vascular plant species, 155, or about 10%, are included on the Official List of Maine's Plants that are Endangered or Threatened. Of the species on the list, three are also listed at the federal level. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. has des·ignated the Furbish's Lousewort (Pedicularis furbishiae) and Small Whorled Pogonia (lsotria medeoloides) as Endangered species and the Prairie White-fringed Orchid (Platanthera leucophaea) as Threatened. Listing rare plants of a particular state or region is a process rather than an isolated and finite event.
    [Show full text]
  • Kenai National Wildlife Refuge Species List, Version 2018-07-24
    Kenai National Wildlife Refuge Species List, version 2018-07-24 Kenai National Wildlife Refuge biology staff July 24, 2018 2 Cover image: map of 16,213 georeferenced occurrence records included in the checklist. Contents Contents 3 Introduction 5 Purpose............................................................ 5 About the list......................................................... 5 Acknowledgments....................................................... 5 Native species 7 Vertebrates .......................................................... 7 Invertebrates ......................................................... 55 Vascular Plants........................................................ 91 Bryophytes ..........................................................164 Other Plants .........................................................171 Chromista...........................................................171 Fungi .............................................................173 Protozoans ..........................................................186 Non-native species 187 Vertebrates ..........................................................187 Invertebrates .........................................................187 Vascular Plants........................................................190 Extirpated species 207 Vertebrates ..........................................................207 Vascular Plants........................................................207 Change log 211 References 213 Index 215 3 Introduction Purpose to avoid implying
    [Show full text]
  • Field Release of the Hoverfly Cheilosia Urbana (Diptera: Syrphidae)
    USDA iiillllllllll United States Department of Field release of the hoverfly Agriculture Cheilosia urbana (Diptera: Marketing and Regulatory Syrphidae) for biological Programs control of invasive Pilosella species hawkweeds (Asteraceae) in the contiguous United States. Environmental Assessment, July 2019 Field release of the hoverfly Cheilosia urbana (Diptera: Syrphidae) for biological control of invasive Pilosella species hawkweeds (Asteraceae) in the contiguous United States. Environmental Assessment, July 2019 Agency Contact: Colin D. Stewart, Assistant Director Pests, Pathogens, and Biocontrol Permits Plant Protection and Quarantine Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service U.S. Department of Agriculture 4700 River Rd., Unit 133 Riverdale, MD 20737 Non-Discrimination Policy The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination against its customers, employees, and applicants for employment on the bases of race, color, national origin, age, disability, sex, gender identity, religion, reprisal, and where applicable, political beliefs, marital status, familial or parental status, sexual orientation, or all or part of an individual's income is derived from any public assistance program, or protected genetic information in employment or in any program or activity conducted or funded by the Department. (Not all prohibited bases will apply to all programs and/or employment activities.) To File an Employment Complaint If you wish to file an employment complaint, you must contact your agency's EEO Counselor (PDF) within 45 days of the date of the alleged discriminatory act, event, or in the case of a personnel action. Additional information can be found online at http://www.ascr.usda.gov/complaint_filing_file.html. To File a Program Complaint If you wish to file a Civil Rights program complaint of discrimination, complete the USDA Program Discrimination Complaint Form (PDF), found online at http://www.ascr.usda.gov/complaint_filing_cust.html, or at any USDA office, or call (866) 632-9992 to request the form.
    [Show full text]
  • Listera Borealis FINAL Sept 18 2013
    The Status of Northern Twayblade Listera borealis in Newfoundland and Labrador Photo: Michael Burzynski prepared for THE SPECIES STATUS ADVISORY COMMITTEE REPORT NO. 30 APRIL 15, 2013 TECHNICAL SUMMARY Listera borealis Morong Northern Twayblade Listère boréale Range of occurrence in Canada: Yukon, Northwest Territories, Nunavut, British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan, Manitoba, Ontario, Québec, Newfoundland and Labrador Demographic Information Generation time (usually average age of parents in the population; Unknown* indicate if another method of estimating generation time indicated in the IUCN guidelines (2008) is being used) [*] But, see discussion in “Overview of Biology” section of main report. Is there an [observed, inferred, or projected] continuing decline in Insufficient data number of mature individuals? Estimated percent of continuing decline in total number of mature Insufficient data individuals within [5 years or 2 generations] [Observed, estimated, inferred, or suspected] percent [reduction or Insufficient data increase] in total number of mature individuals over the last [10 years, or 3 generations]. [Projected or suspected] percent [reduction or increase] in total number Insufficient data of mature individuals over the next [10 years, or 3 generations]. [Observed, estimated, inferred, or suspected] percent [reduction or Insufficient data increase] in total number of mature individuals over any [10 years, or 3 generations] period, over a time period including both the past and the future. Are the causes of the decline clearly reversible and understood and Not applicable ceased? because of insufficient data Are there extreme fluctuations in number of mature individuals? Yes, if based on counts of [**] In some orchids, the number of flowering stems or leaf rosettes flowering stems** visible above ground year does not necessarily reflect the actual number of established plants present below ground.
    [Show full text]
  • Journal of the Oklahoma Native Plant Society, Volume 9, December 2009
    4 Oklahoma Native Plant Record Volume 9, December 2009 VASCULAR PLANTS OF SOUTHEASTERN OKLAHOMA FROM THE SANS BOIS TO THE KIAMICHI MOUNTAINS Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate College of the Oklahoma State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy May 1969 Francis Hobart Means, Jr. Midwest City, Oklahoma Current Email Address: [email protected] The author grew up in the prairie region of Kay County where he learned to appreciate proper management of the soil and the native grass flora. After graduation from college, he moved to Eastern Oklahoma State College where he took a position as Instructor in Botany and Agronomy. In the course of conducting botany field trips and working with local residents on their plant problems, the author became increasingly interested in the flora of that area and of the State of Oklahoma. This led to an extensive study of the northern portion of the Oauchita Highlands with collections currently numbering approximately 4,200. The specimens have been processed according to standard herbarium procedures. The first set has been placed in the Herbarium of Oklahoma State University with the second set going to Eastern Oklahoma State College at Wilburton. Editor’s note: The original species list included habitat characteristics and collection notes. These are omitted here but are available in the dissertation housed at the Edmon-Low Library at OSU or in digital form by request to the editor. [SS] PHYSICAL FEATURES Winding Stair Mountain ranges. A second large valley lies across the southern part of Location and Area Latimer and LeFlore counties between the The area studied is located primarily in Winding Stair and Kiamichi mountain the Ouachita Highlands of eastern ranges.
    [Show full text]
  • Tracking List
    Tracked Taxa List: Current as of Vascular Plants 2021-Jan-29 This list contains the tracked vascular plant taxa known by the Saskatchewan Conservation Data Centre (SKCDC) to occur within Saskatchewan, as of the date provided above. If you notice any errors or omissions, please contact [email protected]. For more information about how the SKCDC generates these lists and what determines when a species is tracked by the SKCDC, visit: http://biodiversity.sk.ca/lists.htm Conservation ranks/status are provided for each species. For details on each, refer to the following resources: ◦ Subnational (S), National (N) and Global (G) Ranks: www.biodiversity.sk.ca/ranking.htm ◦ Government of Saskatchewan Wild Species at Risk Regulations: https://publications.saskatchewan.ca/#/products/1609 ◦ COSEWIC: https://www.cosewic.ca/index.php ◦ SARA; Government of Canada Species at Risk public registry: https://www.canada.ca/en/environment-climate-change/services/species-risk-public-registry.html SYNONYMS: This list is being provided by the SKCDC as a tool to facilitate users in determining the current, accepted taxonomy. If a name is currently out of use in Saskatchewan, it’s current synonym is provided, indented in the line below the accepted name. In this row, we are unable to distinguish between true synonyms and misapplied names used as synonyms. For example, Cryptantha fendleri is an accepted name for a vascular plant that is currently found in Saskatchewan. This name, however, has also been misapplied to both Cryptantha kelseyana and Cryptantha minima in the past. Therefore, it appears as a synonym to those two species.
    [Show full text]
  • A List of Vascular Plant Species in the Nova Scotia Flora
    A list of vascular plant species in the Nova Scotia flora AFTER the page below was posted, The Atlantic Canada Conservation Data Centre posted their authoritative lists of Species Ranks for vascualar and non-vascular plants and for invertebrate and vertebrate animals for each of the Atlantic Provinces. See ACCDC Species Ranks. The page below remains posted for the time-being, but visitors are advised that the ACCDC Species Ranks pages are the better ones to consult. A list of native and naturalized vascular plant species in Nova Scotia was generated from Wild Species 2005: The General Status of Species in Canada using the General Status Search Tool. See Wild Species 2005:General Status Summaries:Vascular Plants for details about the listings. The Report parameters were: Report: "Ferns (2005), Orchids (2005), Vascular Plants (2005)" Status: "At risk, May be at risk, Sensitive, Secure, Undetermined, Not assessed, Exotic" Range: "NS" A total of 1657 records matched those criteria. The conservation rankings and number of species within each rank were as follows: Rank Description No. Species 1 At Risk 8 2 May Be At Risk 127 3 Sensitive 136 4 Secure 694 5 Undetermined 96 6 Not Assessed 0 7 Exotic 596 The list is convenient for looking up scientific names of species for which you have a common name or vice versa, also to see a list of all species within a family. Use your browser's FIND function to find a name within the page. Limitations Please note that only one common name for each species is given, also that synonyms for the scientific names are not listed.
    [Show full text]
  • Checklist of the Vascular Plants of San Diego County 5Th Edition
    cHeckliSt of tHe vaScUlaR PlaNtS of SaN DieGo coUNty 5th edition Pinus torreyana subsp. torreyana Downingia concolor var. brevior Thermopsis californica var. semota Pogogyne abramsii Hulsea californica Cylindropuntia fosbergii Dudleya brevifolia Chorizanthe orcuttiana Astragalus deanei by Jon P. Rebman and Michael G. Simpson San Diego Natural History Museum and San Diego State University examples of checklist taxa: SPecieS SPecieS iNfRaSPecieS iNfRaSPecieS NaMe aUtHoR RaNk & NaMe aUtHoR Eriodictyon trichocalyx A. Heller var. lanatum (Brand) Jepson {SD 135251} [E. t. subsp. l. (Brand) Munz] Hairy yerba Santa SyNoNyM SyMBol foR NoN-NATIVE, NATURaliZeD PlaNt *Erodium cicutarium (L.) Aiton {SD 122398} red-Stem Filaree/StorkSbill HeRBaRiUM SPeciMeN coMMoN DocUMeNTATION NaMe SyMBol foR PlaNt Not liSteD iN THE JEPSON MANUAL †Rhus aromatica Aiton var. simplicifolia (Greene) Conquist {SD 118139} Single-leaF SkunkbruSH SyMBol foR StRict eNDeMic TO SaN DieGo coUNty §§Dudleya brevifolia (Moran) Moran {SD 130030} SHort-leaF dudleya [D. blochmaniae (Eastw.) Moran subsp. brevifolia Moran] 1B.1 S1.1 G2t1 ce SyMBol foR NeaR eNDeMic TO SaN DieGo coUNty §Nolina interrata Gentry {SD 79876} deHeSa nolina 1B.1 S2 G2 ce eNviRoNMeNTAL liStiNG SyMBol foR MiSiDeNtifieD PlaNt, Not occURRiNG iN coUNty (Note: this symbol used in appendix 1 only.) ?Cirsium brevistylum Cronq. indian tHiStle i checklist of the vascular plants of san Diego county 5th edition by Jon p. rebman and Michael g. simpson san Diego natural history Museum and san Diego state university publication of: san Diego natural history Museum san Diego, california ii Copyright © 2014 by Jon P. Rebman and Michael G. Simpson Fifth edition 2014. isBn 0-918969-08-5 Copyright © 2006 by Jon P.
    [Show full text]
  • White River National Forest Rare Plant Survey 2006
    White River National Forest Rare Plant Survey 2006 Prepared for White River National Forest By Peggy Lyon, Janis Huggins and Georgia Doyle Colorado Natural Heritage Program 254 General Services Building Colorado State University Fort Collins CO 80523 Acknowledgments This project would not have been possible without the help of many people in the White River National Forest: Kevin Atchley for first requesting this survey and working to get a contract in place; Beth Brenneman and Keith Giezentanner who took over for Kevin when he left the area; Joe Doerr and Philip Nyland, for sharing their experience and caring about the rare plants on the forest. Also, we depend on the support of the staff of CNHP in Fort Collins, especially Dave Anderson, Jill Handwerk, Susan Spackman, and Amy Lavender. Thanks also to Tim Hogan at the CU Herbarium for assisting with identification of problem plants; Dee Malone for her expertise and transportation to Taylor Pass; and John Chapman, FS Volunteer, for his time and transportation to Warren Lakes. Colorado Natural Areas Program, under the energetic direction of Brian Kurzel, and members of the Colorado Native Plant Society assisted with a survey of the Hoosier Ridge State Natural Area. Finally, thanks to our spouses, George and Rick, for putting up with our absences over the summer, and our faithful companions Molly and Misia, who protected us from Ptarmigan and other scary things. 2 Executive Summary The White River National Forest contracted with Colorado State University in 2005 to have the Colorado Natural Heritage Program (CNHP) conduct a survey of sensitive plants on the forest.
    [Show full text]
  • Our Home and Native Land: Canadian Species of Global Conservation Concern
    Our Home and Native Land Canadian Species of Global Conservation Concern NatureServe Canada contributes to the conservation of Canada’s biodiversity by providing scientific data and expertise about species and ecosystems of conservation concern to support decision-making, research, and education. Citation: Cannings, S., M. Anions, R. Rainer, and B. Stein. 2005. Our Home and Native Land: Canadian Species of Global Conservation Concern. NatureServe Canada: Ottawa, Ontario. © NatureServe Canada 2005 ISBN 0-9711053-4-0 Primary funding for the publication of this report was provided by the Suncor Energy Foundation. This report is also available in French. To request a copy, please contact NatureServe Canada. NatureServe Canada 960 Carling Avenue Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0C6 613-759-1861 www.natureserve-canada.ca Our Home and Native Land Canadian Species of Global Conservation Concern by Sydney Cannings Marilyn F. E. Anions Rob Rainer Bruce A. Stein Sydney Cannings NatureServe Yukon Fish and Wildlife Branch Yukon Department of the Environment P.O. Box 2703 Whitehorse, Yukon Y1A 2C6 867-667-3684 Marilyn F. E. Anions NatureServe Canada 960 Carling Avenue Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0C6 Note on Captions: For each species, captions state the range in Canada only, as well as the NatureServe global conservation status. 613-759-1942 Rob Rainer Front Cover Chelsea, Québec Left to right: Steller sea lions (Eumetopias jubatus). Vulnerable (G3). 819-827-9082 British Columbia. / Photo by Jared Hobbs. Golden paintbrush (Castilleja levisecta). Critically imperiled (G1). British Bruce A. Stein, Ph.D. Columbia. / Photo by Leah Ramsay, British Columbia Conservation Data NatureServe Centre. 1101 Wilson Blvd., 15th Floor Spotted owl (Strix occidentalis).
    [Show full text]
  • List of Alaskan Seed Plant and Fern Names Compiled from ALA, ACCS, PAF, WCSP, FNA
    List of Alaskan Seed Plant and Fern names Compiled from ALA, ACCS, PAF, WCSP, FNA (Questions to [email protected]) January 18, 2020 Acoraceae Acorus americanus (Raf.) Raf. (GUID: trop-2100001). In Alaska according to ALA, FNA. An accepted name according to ALA, FNA.A synonym of: • Acorus calamus var. americanus Raf. according to WCSP ; Comments: WCSP Acorus calamus L. (GUID: ipni-84009-1). In Alaska according to ACCS. An accepted name according to WCSP, ACCS. Adoxaceae Adoxa moschatellina L. (GUID: ipni-5331-2). In Alaska according to ALA, PAF, ACCS. An accepted name according to ALA, PAF, WCSP, ACCS. Sambucus pubens Michx. (GUID: ipni-227191-2). In Alaska according to ACCS. An accepted name according to WCSP, ALA.A synonym of: • Sambucus racemosa subsp. pubens (Michx.) Hultén according to PAF ; Comments: Subspecies [pubens] reaches the Arctic in southwestern Alaska. This hardy race is introduced in northern Norway and Iceland, escaping in Iceland, and may be found in the arctic parts. • Sambucus racemosa subsp. pubens (Michx.) House according to ACCS ; Comments: Panarctic Flora Checklist Sambucus racemosa L. (GUID: ipni-30056767-2). In Alaska according to ACCS. An accepted name according to ALA, WCSP, ACCS. Sambucus racemosa subsp. pubens (Michx.) House (GUID: NULL). In Alaska according to ACCS. An accepted name according to ACCS. Sambucus racemosa subsp. pubens (Michx.) Hultén (GUID: ipni-227221-2). In Alaska according to ALA, PAF. An accepted name according to ALA, PAF. Viburnum edule (Michx.) Raf. (GUID: ipni-149665-1). In Alaska according to ALA, PAF, ACCS. An accepted name according to ALA, PAF, ACCS. Viburnum opulus L.
    [Show full text]