DOCSLIB.ORG

Tracking List

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Tracking List Tracked Taxa List: Current as of Vascular Plants 2021-Jan-29 This list contains the tracked vascular plant taxa known by the Saskatchewan Conservation Data Centre (SKCDC) to occur within Saskatchewan, as of the date provided above. If you notice any errors or omissions, please contact [email protected]. For more information about how the SKCDC generates these lists and what determines when a species is tracked by the SKCDC, visit: http://biodiversity.sk.ca/lists.htm Conservation ranks/status are provided for each species. For details on each, refer to the following resources: ◦ Subnational (S), National (N) and Global (G) Ranks: www.biodiversity.sk.ca/ranking.htm ◦ Government of Saskatchewan Wild Species at Risk Regulations: https://publications.saskatchewan.ca/#/products/1609 ◦ COSEWIC: https://www.cosewic.ca/index.php ◦ SARA; Government of Canada Species at Risk public registry: https://www.canada.ca/en/environment-climate-change/services/species-risk-public-registry.html SYNONYMS: This list is being provided by the SKCDC as a tool to facilitate users in determining the current, accepted taxonomy. If a name is currently out of use in Saskatchewan, it’s current synonym is provided, indented in the line below the accepted name. In this row, we are unable to distinguish between true synonyms and misapplied names used as synonyms. For example, Cryptantha fendleri is an accepted name for a vascular plant that is currently found in Saskatchewan. This name, however, has also been misapplied to both Cryptantha kelseyana and Cryptantha minima in the past. Therefore, it appears as a synonym to those two species. In addition, there may be more than one current name for any given out-of-date name (e.g., Cryptantha nubigena) if a species had been split, or if a name was misapplied to more than one species in the past. It is up to the user to ensure that the taxon name they choose is the correct one for what they have observed. Tracked Taxa List: Vascular Plants ID: Scientific Name: Common Name: G-Rank: N-Rank: S-Rank: COSEWIC: Adoxaceae 10790 Adoxa moschatellina Musk-root G5 N5 S3 ADOX MOS Moschatel Agavaceae - Century-plant family 12329 Yucca glauca Small Soapweed Yucca G5 N1 S1 Threatened Great Plains Yucca Soapweed Alismataceae - Water-plantain family 12330 Alisma gramineum Narrow-leaved Water Plantain G5 N4N5 S3 Alisma gramineum var. gramineum ALIS GRA GRA Alisma gramineum var. angustissimum Geyer's Water Plantain Alisma gramineum var. graminifolium Narrow-leaved Water-plantain Alisma gramineum var. greyeri Alisma geyeri Amaranthaceae - Amaranth family 10793 Amaranthus californicus California Amaranth G4 N2N3 S2 Anacardiaceae - Sumac family 10796 Rhus glabra Smooth Sumac G5 N5 SH RHUS GLA Scarlet Sumac Apiaceae - Carrot family 10814 Lomatium cous Mountain Meadow-parsley G5 N1N2 S1 Lomatium montanum Cous Biscuit-root 10816 Lomatium dissectum var. multifidum Mountain Wild Parsnip G4T4 N5 S1 Lomatium dissectum var. eatonii Lomatium multifidum 10821 Lomatium orientale White-flowered Meadow-parsley G5 N1N2 S1 Desert Parsley LOMA ORI 10824 Osmorhiza berteroi Chilean Sweet-cicley G5 N5 S1 Osmorhiza chilensis Mountain sweet-cicely Osmorhiza divaricata OSMO CHI Western Sweet-cicely 10830 Perideridia gairdneri ssp. borealis Gairdner's Yampah G5T5 NNR S2 Common Yampah PERI GAI BOR Yampah Apocynaceae - Dogbane family 10846 Asclepias syriaca Silky Milkweed G5 N5 S1 Common Milkweed This Report may be cited as: Saskatchewan Conservation Data Centre. January 2021. 2021-Jan-29 Apocynaceae Saskatchewan Vascular Plant Tracked Taxa List. Regina, Saskatchewan. Retrieved from www.biodiversity.sk.ca/SppList.htm Page 2 of 44 Tracked Taxa List: Vascular Plants ID: Scientific Name: Common Name: G-Rank: N-Rank: S-Rank: COSEWIC: 10847 Asclepias verticillata Whorled Milkweed G5 N4N5 S1 Aspleniaceae - Spleenwort family 463438 Asplenium viride Green Spleenwort G5 N5 SNR Asteraceae - Aster family 10851 Achillea millefolium var. megacephala Large-headed Woolly Yarrow G5T1T2 N1N2 S1 Special Concern Achillea millefolium ssp. megacephala ACHI MIL MEG Achillea lanulosa ssp. megacephala Large-headed Wooly Yarrow 11177 Almutaster pauciflorus Few-flowered Aster G4 N3N4 S3 Aster pauciflorus ASTE PAC 10859 Ambrosia acanthicarpa Bur Ragweed G5 N3 S2 Gaertneria acanthicarpa Annual Bursage Franseria acanthicarpa Bursage Ragweed FRNK ACA Flat-spine Burr Ragweed Sand Bursage 10865 Anaphalis margaritacea Pearly Everlasting G5 N5 S3 Anaphalis margaritacea var. subalpina ANAH MAR Anaphalis margaritacea var. occidentalis Anaphalis margaritacea var. angustior Anaphalis margaritacea var. intercedens 10866 Antennaria anaphaloides Tall Pussytoes G5 N4N5 S1 Antennaria pulcherrima var. anaphaloides ANTE ANA Tall Everlasting 10867 Antennaria corymbosa Flat-topped Pussy-toes G5 N2 S1 Antennaria dioica var. corymbosa Corymbose Ever-lasting Flat-top Ever-lasting Meadow Pussy-toes 10868 Antennaria dimorpha Low Pussytoes G5 N5 S3 Antennaria latisquama ANTE DIM Antennaria macrocephala Cushion Everlasting Cushion Pussytoes Two-form Pussytoes 10873 Antennaria umbrinella Brown-bracted Pussytoes G5 N5 S2 Antennaria aizoides ANTE UMB Antennaria flavescens Umber Pussytoes 10892 Arnica angustifolia ssp. angustifolia Narrow-leaf Leopardbane G5T5 N5 SH Arnica alpina ssp. attenuata Arctic Arnica Arnica angustifolia ssp. attenuata Narrow-leaved Arnica Arnica alpina var. attenuata Arnica alpina ssp. angustifolia Arnica alpina 10887 Arnica cordifolia Heart-leaved Arnica G5 N5 S3 ARNI COR This Report may be cited as: Saskatchewan Conservation Data Centre. January 2021. 2021-Jan-29 Asteraceae Saskatchewan Vascular Plant Tracked Taxa List. Regina, Saskatchewan. Retrieved from www.biodiversity.sk.ca/SppList.htm Page 3 of 44 Tracked Taxa List: Vascular Plants ID: Scientific Name: Common Name: G-Rank: N-Rank: S-Rank: COSEWIC: 10889 Arnica lonchophylla Spear-leaved Arnica G5 N5 S2 Arnica alpina var. lonchophylla Arnica angustifolia ssp. lonchophylla 23242 Arnica sororia Twin Arnica G5 N5 S2 Arnica fulgens var. sororia ARNI SOR Twin leopardbane 28361 Artemisia campestris ssp. canadensis Canada Sagewort G5TNR NNR S3 Artemisia canadensis Canada Wormwood 10906 Artemisia tilesii Mountain Sagewort G5 N5 S1 11053 Bidens beckii Water-marigold G5 N5 S2 Megalodonta beckii Beck's Beggarticks 10915 Bidens frondosa Tall Beggar's-ticks G5 N5 S3 BIDE FRO Devil's Pitchfork 444258 Bidens tripartita Three-parted Beggarticks G5 N5 S1 10918 Boltonia asteroides var. recognita Aster-like Boltonia G5T3T5 N2N3 S3 Boltonia recognita BOLT AST REC Boltonia latisquama var. recognita Boltonia asteroides var. occidentalis 11176 Canadanthus modestus Large Northern Aster G5 N5 S3 Aster modestus ASTE MOD Aster modestus var. major Aster major Weberaster modestus 10931 Cirsium drummondii Short-stemmed Thistle G5 N5 S3 Cirsium coccinium CIRS DRU Cirsium foliosum Dwarf Thistle 10934 Cirsium muticum Swamp Thistle G5 N5 S3 Cirsium muticum var. monticola CIRS MUT 10942 Crepis atribarba Dark Hawk's-beard G5 N5 S2 Crepis atribarba ssp. atribarba Slender Hawk's-beard 10944 Crepis intermedia Small-flowered Hawk's-beard G5 N4 SH Crepis acuminata var. intermedia CREP ACU Crepis occidentalis Limestone Hawk's Beard 10946 Crepis occidentalis ssp. costata Large-flower Hawk's-beard G5T5 N4 S3 Crepis occidentalis var. costata CREP OCC COS 27677 Crepis occidentalis ssp. occidentalis Gray Hawk's-beard G5T5 N4 S3 10950 Crepis runcinata ssp. hispidulosa Smooth Hawk's-beard G5T4 N4 S1 Crepis runcinata var. hispidulosa CREP RUN HIS This Report may be cited as: Saskatchewan Conservation Data Centre. January 2021. 2021-Jan-29 Asteraceae Saskatchewan Vascular Plant Tracked Taxa List. Regina, Saskatchewan. Retrieved from www.biodiversity.sk.ca/SppList.htm Page 4 of 44 Tracked Taxa List: Vascular Plants ID: Scientific Name: Common Name: G-Rank: N-Rank: S-Rank: COSEWIC: 10909 Doellingeria umbellata var. pubens Flat-top White Aster G5T5 N5 S2 Doellingeria umbellata ssp. pubens ASTE UMB PUB Aster umbellatus var. pubens Parasol White-top Aster pubentior 26834 Echinacea angustifolia var. angustifolia Narrow-leaved Purple G4T4 NNR S3 Coneflower 10959 Erigeron compositus Compound Fleabane G5 N5 S3 Erigeron compositus var. glabratus Cut-leaved Daisy Erigeron compositus var. discoideus Dwarf Mountain Fleabane Erigeron compositus var. multifidus ERIG COM 11149 Erigeron elatus Tall White Fleabane G5 N5 S3 Trimorpha elata ERIG ELA Erigeron acris var. elatus 10963 Erigeron hyssopifolius Hyssop-leaved Fleabane G5 N5 S3 10971 Erigeron radicatus Dwarf Fleabane G3G4 N3N4 S3 Not at Risk Erigeron huberi ERIG RAD Erigeron macounii Hooker's Fleabane Tap-rooted Fleabane 10973 Erigeron strigosus var. septentrionalis Prairie Fleabane G5T5? NU S3 ERIG STR SEP 27702 Erigeron strigosus var. strigosus Daisy Fleabane G5T5 N5 S3 Erigeron traversii ERIG STR STR 11006 Helianthus tuberosus Jerusalem Artichoke G5 N3N4 S2 Helianthus tuberosus var. subcanescens HELN TUB Helianthus tomentosus 402936 Heliopsis helianthoides var. scabra Rough Ox-eye G5T5 N5 S2 Heliopsis helianthoides var. occidentalis False Sunflower Heliopsis helianthoides ssp. occidentalis Sunflower Heliopsis Heliopsis scabra Sweet Oxeye 11018 Hieracium albiflorum White-flowered Hawkweed G5 N5 S1 Chlorocrepis albiflorum HIER ALB 11024 Hymenopappus filifolius var. Tufted Hymenopappus G5T4T5 N3 S3 polycephalus Hymenopappus polycephalus Fine-leaf Hymenopappus HYME FIL POL Woollywhite 11030 Lactuca biennis Tall Blue Lettuce G5 N5 S3 Lactuca biennis var. integrifolia LACT BIE 11032 Lactuca ludoviciana Western Lettuce G4G5 NU SH Lactuca campestris
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Guide De Reconnaissance Des Habitats Forestiers Des Plantes Menacées Ou Vulnérables
    Guide de reconnaissance des habitats forestiers des plantes menacées ou vulnérables BAS-SAINT-LAURENT ET GASPÉSIE 2007 II Équipe de travail Édition : Direction de l’environnement forestier et Direction des communications Coordination : Pierre Petitclerc1 Rédaction : Line Couillard2, Norman Dignard3, Jacques Labrecque2, Gildo Lavoie2 et Pierre Petitclerc Collaboration : Lucille Bastien1, Jean-Pierre Berger4, André R. Bouchard1, Pierre Grondin3, Bruno Lévesque1, Andrée Michaud3 et Vincent Piché2 Géomatique : Danièle Pouliot1 Cartographie : Yves Lachance2 Révision linguistique : Marie-France LeBlanc (consultante) et Pierre Bélanger3 Photographes : Marco Bellavance, Agence régionale de mise en valeur des forêts privées du Bas-Saint-Laurent André R. Bouchard, ministère des Ressources naturelles et de la Faune Lina Breton, ministère des Ressources naturelles et de la Faune Line Couillard, ministère du Développement durable, de l’Environnement et des Parcs Frédéric Coursol, consultant Norman Dignard, ministère des Ressources naturelles et de la Faune Chris Evans (www.forestryimages.org) Donald Gunn, Royal Botanical Gardens (Ontario) William S. Justice (www.forestryimages.org) Scott A. Millburn, consultant Robert H. Mohlenbrock (plants.usda.gov) Sébastien Nadeau, Agence régionale de mise en valeur des forêts privées du Bas-Saint-Laurent Pierre Petitclerc, ministère des Ressources naturelles et de la Faune Benoît Toussaint, ministère des Ressources naturelles et de la Faune Benoît Tremblay, Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières Photos (couverture) : André R. Bouchard, gauche. Norman Dignard, haut droit. Pierre Petitclerc, bas droit. Conception graphique et montage : Bissonnette Communications Impact Impression : J. B. Deschamps Citation recommandée : PETITCLERC P., N. DIGNARD, L. COUILLARD, G. LAVOIE et J. LABRECQUE, 2007. Guide de reconnaissance des habitats forestiers des plantes menacées ou vulnérables.
    [Show full text]
  • Native Habitat Restoration in Eastern Washington Wine Vineyards
    NATIVE HABITAT RESTORATION IN EASTERN WASHINGTON WINE VINEYARDS AS A PEST MANAGEMENT STRATEGY By KATHARINE DENISE BUCKLEY A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY Department of Entomology MAY 2019 © Copyright by KATHARINE DENISE BUCKLEY, 2019 All Rights Reserved © Copyright by KATHARINE DENISE BUCKLEY, 2019 All Rights Reserved To the Faculty of Washington State University: The members of the Committee appointed to examine the dissertation of KATHARINE DENISE BUCKLEY find it satisfactory and recommend that it be accepted. _______________________________ David James, Ph.D., Chair _______________________________ Elizabeth Beers, Ph.D. _______________________________ Joan Davenport, Ph.D. ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I thank Lorraine Seymour and Gerry Lauby for their expertise, their organizational skills, their excellence as sounding boards, and hopefully their ability to pass some of that on to me. I thank Cole Provence and my family who were always supportive. I thank all the people who helped me with my statistics, especially Bernardo Chaves. I thank the computer technician who saved my computer’s data and my life. I thank Michael Aquilino. He knows what he did. Finally, I’d like to thank everyone who served on my committee, as well as Laura Lavine, for their guidance along the way. iii NATIVE HABITAT RESTORATION IN EASTERN WASHINGTON WINE VINEYARDS AS A PEST MANAGEMENT STRATEGY Abstract by Katharine Denise Buckley, Ph.D. Washington State University May 2019 Chair: David James Perennial crop systems such as wine grapes have begun using cover crops and hedgerows to increase beneficial insects and promote sustainable vineyard management in areas such as New Zealand and California.
    [Show full text]
  • Alberta Wetland Classification System – June 1, 2015
    Alberta Wetland Classification System June 1, 2015 ISBN 978-1-4601-2257-0 (Print) ISBN: 978-1-4601-2258-7 (PDF) Title: Alberta Wetland Classification System Guide Number: ESRD, Water Conservation, 2015, No. 3 Program Name: Water Policy Branch Effective Date: June 1, 2015 This document was updated on: April 13, 2015 Citation: Alberta Environment and Sustainable Resource Development (ESRD). 2015. Alberta Wetland Classification System. Water Policy Branch, Policy and Planning Division, Edmonton, AB. Any comments, questions, or suggestions regarding the content of this document may be directed to: Water Policy Branch Alberta Environment and Sustainable Resource Development 7th Floor, Oxbridge Place 9820 – 106th Street Edmonton, Alberta T5K 2J6 Phone: 780-644-4959 Email: [email protected] Additional copies of this document may be obtained by contacting: Alberta Environment and Sustainable Resource Development Information Centre Main Floor, Great West Life Building 9920 108 Street Edmonton Alberta Canada T5K 2M4 Call Toll Free Alberta: 310-ESRD (3773) Toll Free: 1-877-944-0313 Fax: 780-427-4407 Email: [email protected] Website: http://esrd.alberta.ca Alberta Wetland Classification System Contributors: Matthew Wilson Environment and Sustainable Resource Development Thorsten Hebben Environment and Sustainable Resource Development Danielle Cobbaert Alberta Energy Regulator Linda Halsey Stantec Linda Kershaw Arctic and Alpine Environmental Consulting Nick Decarlo Stantec Environment and Sustainable Resource Development would also
    [Show full text]
  • Botanical Survey at Reed River Hot Springs, Gates of the Arctic National Park and Preserve (GAAR)
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Botanical Survey at Reed River Hot Springs, Gates of the Arctic National Park and Preserve (GAAR) Natural Resource Report NPS/GAAR/NRR—2016/1136 ON THIS PAGE Photograph of two hot water outlets in the uppermost part of the A field. The hot springs are surrounded by azonal, lush fern vegetation. The central part of the A field consisted mainly of broken sinter material and very sparse vegetation. Photograph courtesy of Lisa Strecker ON THE COVER Photograph of A field of the Reed River Hot Springs and the Reed River as seen from the slope above the hot springs. The bright green vegetation of the hot springs area contrasts starkly with plant cover on the other side of the Reed River which is characteristic for the area. Photograph courtesy of Lisa Strecker Botanical Survey at Reed River Hot Springs, Gates of the Arctic National Park and Preserve (GAAR) Natural Resource Report NPS/GAAR/NRR—2016/1136 Lisa Strecker Gates of the Arctic National Park and Preserve 4175 Geist Road Fairbanks, AK 99709 February 2016 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Fort Collins, Colorado The National Park Service, Natural Resource Stewardship and Science office in Fort Collins, Colorado, publishes a range of reports that address natural resource topics. These reports are of interest and applicability to a broad audience in the National Park Service and others in natural resource management, including scientists, conservation and environmental constituencies, and the public.
    [Show full text]
  • Idaho PM Technical Note 2B (Revise): Plants for Pollinators in the Inland Northwest
    TECHNICAL NOTE USDA – Natural Resources Conservation Service Boise, Idaho - Spokane, Washington ______________________________________________________________________________ TN PLANT MATERIALS NO. 2B OCTOBER 2011 REVISION Plants for Pollinators in the Inland Northwest Dan Ogle, Plant Materials Specialist, NRCS, Boise, Idaho Pamela Pavek, Agronomist, NRCS Plant Materials Center, Pullman, Washington Richard Fleenor, Plant Materials Specialist, NRCS, Spokane, Washington Mark Stannard, Manager, NRCS Plant Materials Center, Pullman, Washington Tim Dring, State Biologist, NRCS, Spokane, Washington Jim Cane, Bee Biology and Systematics Lab, ARS, Logan, Utah Karen Fullen, State Biologist, NRCS, Boise, Idaho Loren St. John, Manager, NRCS Plant Materials Center, Aberdeen, Idaho Derek Tilley, Agronomist, NRCS Plant Materials Center, Aberdeen, Idaho Brownbelted bumble bee (Bombus griseocollis) visiting a blanketflower (Gaillardia aristata). Pamela Pavek The purpose of this Technical Note is to provide guidance for the design and implementation of conservation plantings to enhance habitat for pollinators including: bees, wasps, butterflies, moths and hummingbirds. Plant species included in this document are adapted to the Inland Northwest, which encompasses northern Idaho, northeastern Oregon and eastern Washington. For species adapted to southern Idaho, southeastern Oregon, northern Nevada and northern Utah, refer to Idaho Plant Materials Technical Note 2A. For lists of species adapted to western Washington and western Oregon, refer to the Oregon
    [Show full text]
  • Pinery Provincial Park Vascular Plant List Flowering Latin Name Common Name Community Date
    Pinery Provincial Park Vascular Plant List Flowering Latin Name Common Name Community Date EQUISETACEAE HORSETAIL FAMILY Equisetum arvense L. Field Horsetail FF Equisetum fluviatile L. Water Horsetail LRB Equisetum hyemale L. ssp. affine (Engelm.) Stone Common Scouring-rush BS Equisetum laevigatum A. Braun Smooth Scouring-rush WM Equisetum variegatum Scheich. ex Fried. ssp. Small Horsetail LRB Variegatum DENNSTAEDIACEAE BRACKEN FAMILY Pteridium aquilinum (L.) Kuhn Bracken-Fern COF DRYOPTERIDACEAE TRUE FERN FAMILILY Athyrium filix-femina (L.) Roth ssp. angustum (Willd.) Northeastern Lady Fern FF Clausen Cystopteris bulbifera (L.) Bernh. Bulblet Fern FF Dryopteris carthusiana (Villars) H.P. Fuchs Spinulose Woodfern FF Matteuccia struthiopteris (L.) Tod. Ostrich Fern FF Onoclea sensibilis L. Sensitive Fern FF Polystichum acrostichoides (Michaux) Schott Christmas Fern FF ADDER’S-TONGUE- OPHIOGLOSSACEAE FERN FAMILY Botrychium virginianum (L.) Sw. Rattlesnake Fern FF FLOWERING FERN OSMUNDACEAE FAMILY Osmunda regalis L. Royal Fern WM POLYPODIACEAE POLYPODY FAMILY Polypodium virginianum L. Rock Polypody FF MAIDENHAIR FERN PTERIDACEAE FAMILY Adiantum pedatum L. ssp. pedatum Northern Maidenhair Fern FF THELYPTERIDACEAE MARSH FERN FAMILY Thelypteris palustris (Salisb.) Schott Marsh Fern WM LYCOPODIACEAE CLUB MOSS FAMILY Lycopodium lucidulum Michaux Shining Clubmoss OF Lycopodium tristachyum Pursh Ground-cedar COF SELAGINELLACEAE SPIKEMOSS FAMILY Selaginella apoda (L.) Fern. Spikemoss LRB CUPRESSACEAE CYPRESS FAMILY Juniperus communis L. Common Juniper Jun-E DS Juniperus virginiana L. Red Cedar Jun-E SD Thuja occidentalis L. White Cedar LRB PINACEAE PINE FAMILY Larix laricina (Duroi) K. Koch Tamarack Jun LRB Pinus banksiana Lambert Jack Pine COF Pinus resinosa Sol. ex Aiton Red Pine Jun-M CF Pinery Provincial Park Vascular Plant List 1 Pinery Provincial Park Vascular Plant List Flowering Latin Name Common Name Community Date Pinus strobus L.
    [Show full text]
  • Riverside State Park
    Provisonal Report Rare Plant and Vegetation Survey of Riverside State Park Pacific Biodiversity Institute 2 Provisonal Report Rare Plant and Vegetation Survey of Riverside State Park Peter H. Morrison [email protected] George Wooten [email protected] Juliet Rhodes [email protected] Robin O’Quinn, Ph.D. [email protected] Hans M. Smith IV [email protected] January 2009 Pacific Biodiversity Institute P.O. Box 298 Winthrop, Washington 98862 509-996-2490 Recommended Citation Morrison, P.H., G. Wooten, J. Rhodes, R. O’Quinn and H.M. Smith IV, 2008. Provisional Report: Rare Plant and Vegetation Survey of Riverside State Park. Pacific Biodiversity Institute, Winthrop, Washington. 433 p. Acknowledgements Diana Hackenburg and Alexis Monetta assisted with entering and checking the data we collected into databases. The photographs in this report were taken by Peter Morrison, Robin O’Quinn, Geroge Wooten, and Diana Hackenburg. Project Funding This project was funded by the Washington State Parks and Recreation Commission. 3 Executive Summary Pacific Biodiversity Institute (PBI) conducted a rare plant and vegetation survey of Riverside State Park (RSP) for the Washington State Parks and Recreation Commission (WSPRC). RSP is located in Spokane County, Washington. A large portion of the park is located within the City of Spokane. RSP extends along both sides of the Spokane River and includes upland areas on the basalt plateau above the river terraces. The park also includes the lower portion of the Little Spokane River and adjacent uplands. The park contains numerous trails, campgrounds and other recreational facilities. The park receives a tremendous amount of recreational use from the nearby population.
    [Show full text]
  • Part 2 – Fruticose Species
    Appendix 5.2-1 Vegetation Technical Appendix APPENDIX 5.2‐1 Vegetation Technical Appendix Contents Section Page Ecological Land Classification ............................................................................................................ A5.2‐1‐1 Geodatabase Development .............................................................................................. A5.2‐1‐1 Vegetation Community Mapping ..................................................................................... A5.2‐1‐1 Quality Assurance and Quality Control ............................................................................ A5.2‐1‐3 Limitations of Ecological Land Classification .................................................................... A5.2‐1‐3 Field Data Collection ......................................................................................................... A5.2‐1‐3 Supplementary Results ..................................................................................................... A5.2‐1‐4 Rare Vegetation Species and Rare Ecological Communities ........................................................... A5.2‐1‐10 Supplementary Desktop Results ..................................................................................... A5.2‐1‐10 Field Methods ................................................................................................................. A5.2‐1‐16 Supplementary Results ................................................................................................... A5.2‐1‐17 Weed Species
    [Show full text]
  • Flora of the Carolinas, Virginia, and Georgia, Working Draft of 17 March 2004 -- BIBLIOGRAPHY
    Flora of the Carolinas, Virginia, and Georgia, Working Draft of 17 March 2004 -- BIBLIOGRAPHY BIBLIOGRAPHY Ackerfield, J., and J. Wen. 2002. A morphometric analysis of Hedera L. (the ivy genus, Araliaceae) and its taxonomic implications. Adansonia 24: 197-212. Adams, P. 1961. Observations on the Sagittaria subulata complex. Rhodora 63: 247-265. Adams, R.M. II, and W.J. Dress. 1982. Nodding Lilium species of eastern North America (Liliaceae). Baileya 21: 165-188. Adams, R.P. 1986. Geographic variation in Juniperus silicicola and J. virginiana of the Southeastern United States: multivariant analyses of morphology and terpenoids. Taxon 35: 31-75. ------. 1995. Revisionary study of Caribbean species of Juniperus (Cupressaceae). Phytologia 78: 134-150. ------, and T. Demeke. 1993. Systematic relationships in Juniperus based on random amplified polymorphic DNAs (RAPDs). Taxon 42: 553-571. Adams, W.P. 1957. A revision of the genus Ascyrum (Hypericaceae). Rhodora 59: 73-95. ------. 1962. Studies in the Guttiferae. I. A synopsis of Hypericum section Myriandra. Contr. Gray Herbarium Harv. 182: 1-51. ------, and N.K.B. Robson. 1961. A re-evaluation of the generic status of Ascyrum and Crookea (Guttiferae). Rhodora 63: 10-16. Adams, W.P. 1973. Clusiaceae of the southeastern United States. J. Elisha Mitchell Sci. Soc. 89: 62-71. Adler, L. 1999. Polygonum perfoliatum (mile-a-minute weed). Chinquapin 7: 4. Aedo, C., J.J. Aldasoro, and C. Navarro. 1998. Taxonomic revision of Geranium sections Batrachioidea and Divaricata (Geraniaceae). Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 85: 594-630. Affolter, J.M. 1985. A monograph of the genus Lilaeopsis (Umbelliferae). Systematic Bot. Monographs 6. Ahles, H.E., and A.E.
    [Show full text]
  • Kenai National Wildlife Refuge Species List, Version 2018-07-24
    Kenai National Wildlife Refuge Species List, version 2018-07-24 Kenai National Wildlife Refuge biology staff July 24, 2018 2 Cover image: map of 16,213 georeferenced occurrence records included in the checklist. Contents Contents 3 Introduction 5 Purpose............................................................ 5 About the list......................................................... 5 Acknowledgments....................................................... 5 Native species 7 Vertebrates .......................................................... 7 Invertebrates ......................................................... 55 Vascular Plants........................................................ 91 Bryophytes ..........................................................164 Other Plants .........................................................171 Chromista...........................................................171 Fungi .............................................................173 Protozoans ..........................................................186 Non-native species 187 Vertebrates ..........................................................187 Invertebrates .........................................................187 Vascular Plants........................................................190 Extirpated species 207 Vertebrates ..........................................................207 Vascular Plants........................................................207 Change log 211 References 213 Index 215 3 Introduction Purpose to avoid implying
    [Show full text]
  • Annotated Checklist of Vascular Flora, Bryce
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Program Center Annotated Checklist of Vascular Flora Bryce Canyon National Park Natural Resource Technical Report NPS/NCPN/NRTR–2009/153 ON THE COVER Matted prickly-phlox (Leptodactylon caespitosum), Bryce Canyon National Park, Utah. Photograph by Walter Fertig. Annotated Checklist of Vascular Flora Bryce Canyon National Park Natural Resource Technical Report NPS/NCPN/NRTR–2009/153 Author Walter Fertig Moenave Botanical Consulting 1117 W. Grand Canyon Dr. Kanab, UT 84741 Sarah Topp Northern Colorado Plateau Network P.O. Box 848 Moab, UT 84532 Editing and Design Alice Wondrak Biel Northern Colorado Plateau Network P.O. Box 848 Moab, UT 84532 January 2009 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Program Center Fort Collins, Colorado The Natural Resource Publication series addresses natural resource topics that are of interest and applicability to a broad readership in the National Park Service and to others in the management of natural resources, including the scientifi c community, the public, and the NPS conservation and environmental constituencies. Manuscripts are peer-reviewed to ensure that the information is scientifi cally credible, technically accurate, appropriately written for the intended audience, and is designed and published in a professional manner. The Natural Resource Technical Report series is used to disseminate the peer-reviewed results of scientifi c studies in the physical, biological, and social sciences for both the advancement of science and the achievement of the National Park Service’s mission. The reports provide contributors with a forum for displaying comprehensive data that are often deleted from journals because of page limitations.
    [Show full text]
  • Floristic Quality Assessment Report
    FLORISTIC QUALITY ASSESSMENT IN INDIANA: THE CONCEPT, USE, AND DEVELOPMENT OF COEFFICIENTS OF CONSERVATISM Tulip poplar (Liriodendron tulipifera) the State tree of Indiana June 2004 Final Report for ARN A305-4-53 EPA Wetland Program Development Grant CD975586-01 Prepared by: Paul E. Rothrock, Ph.D. Taylor University Upland, IN 46989-1001 Introduction Since the early nineteenth century the Indiana landscape has undergone a massive transformation (Jackson 1997). In the pre-settlement period, Indiana was an almost unbroken blanket of forests, prairies, and wetlands. Much of the land was cleared, plowed, or drained for lumber, the raising of crops, and a range of urban and industrial activities. Indiana’s native biota is now restricted to relatively small and often isolated tracts across the State. This fragmentation and reduction of the State’s biological diversity has challenged Hoosiers to look carefully at how to monitor further changes within our remnant natural communities and how to effectively conserve and even restore many of these valuable places within our State. To meet this monitoring, conservation, and restoration challenge, one needs to develop a variety of appropriate analytical tools. Ideally these techniques should be simple to learn and apply, give consistent results between different observers, and be repeatable. Floristic Assessment, which includes metrics such as the Floristic Quality Index (FQI) and Mean C values, has gained wide acceptance among environmental scientists and decision-makers, land stewards, and restoration ecologists in Indiana’s neighboring states and regions: Illinois (Taft et al. 1997), Michigan (Herman et al. 1996), Missouri (Ladd 1996), and Wisconsin (Bernthal 2003) as well as northern Ohio (Andreas 1993) and southern Ontario (Oldham et al.
    [Show full text]