DOCSLIB.ORG

Commuter Rail Study Birmingham/Huntington Park/Hoover/ Helena/Pelham/Alabaster/ South Alabaster/Calera

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Commuter Rail Study Birmingham/Huntington Park/Hoover/ Helena/Pelham/Alabaster/ South Alabaster/Calera Regional Planning Commission of Greater Birmingham Commuter Rail Study Birmingham/Huntington Park/Hoover/ Helena/Pelham/Alabaster/ South Alabaster/Calera Advanced Planning, Programming, and Logical Engineering (APPLE) RPC Project No. 1289.29 Dynamic Civil Solutions and Whitman, Requardt and Associates, LLP August 2019 Commuter Rail Study Birmingham/Hoover/Helena/Pelham/Alabaster Regional Planning Commission of Greater Birmingham Table of Contents 1 Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................................ 1 1.1. The Corridor ............................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2. Corridor Railroads ..................................................................................................................................... 3 1.3. Commuter Rail Concepts ......................................................................................................................... 3 1.4. Commuter Rail Opportunities .................................................................................................................. 4 2 Existing Conditions ............................................................................................................................................. 5 2.1 Corridor Population, Growth and Development .................................................................................... 5 2.2 Existing and Projected Traffic .................................................................................................................. 6 2.2.1 I-65 Corridor Feasibility Study MAGIC 65 ............................................................................................ 6 2.2.2 I-65/US31 Mobility Matters Plan ............................................................................................................. 8 2.2.3 Regional Transportation Plan 2040 Regional Planning Commission of Greater Birmingham .... 10 2.3 Commute Trip Analysis .......................................................................................................................... 11 2.4 Current Railroad Operations .................................................................................................................. 13 2.4.1 CSX Railroad ........................................................................................................................................... 13 2.4.2 NS and Amtrak ........................................................................................................................................ 17 2.4.3 Birmingham Railroad Park Interlocking ............................................................................................... 17 3 Concept Development ...................................................................................................................................... 19 3.1 Railroad Alternatives ............................................................................................................................... 19 3.1.1. Railroad requirements for shared use ............................................................................................... 19 3.1.2. Shared use ............................................................................................................................................. 19 3.1.3. Independent operation ......................................................................................................................... 19 3.2 Operating Plan ......................................................................................................................................... 22 3.3 Potential Stations ..................................................................................................................................... 24 3.3.1 Birmingham – 18th Street Station .......................................................................................................... 24 3.3.2 Huntington Park Station ......................................................................................................................... 26 3.3.3 Hoover Station ......................................................................................................................................... 27 3.3.4 Helena Station ......................................................................................................................................... 30 3.3.5 Pelham Station ........................................................................................................................................ 31 3.3.6 Alabaster Station ..................................................................................................................................... 32 3.3.7 South Alabaster Station ......................................................................................................................... 34 3.3.8 Calera Station .......................................................................................................................................... 35 3.3.9 Other Sites not selected ......................................................................................................................... 36 Commuter Rail Study Birmingham/Hoover/Helena/Pelham/Alabaster Regional Planning Commission of Greater Birmingham 3.4 Transit Oriented Development Opportunities ...................................................................................... 37 3.4.1 Birmingham Station TOD ................................................................................................................... 38 3.4.2 Huntington Park Station TOD ............................................................................................................ 39 3.4.3 Hoover Station TOD ............................................................................................................................... 40 3.4.4 Helena Station TOD ................................................................................................................................ 41 3.4.5 Pelham Station TOD ........................................................................................................................... 42 3.4.6 Alabaster Station TOD ........................................................................................................................... 43 3.4.7 South Alabaster Station TOD ................................................................................................................ 44 3.4.8 Calera Station TOD ................................................................................................................................ 45 3.5 Ridership Estimates ................................................................................................................................ 46 3.5.1 Zone Analysis .......................................................................................................................................... 48 3.5.2 Traffic Impact ........................................................................................................................................... 49 3.6 Planning Level Cost Estimates .............................................................................................................. 51 3.6.1 Capital cost estimates ............................................................................................................................ 51 3.6.2 Operating cost estimates ....................................................................................................................... 52 3.7 Summary of Stakeholder Meeting ......................................................................................................... 53 3.8 Commuter Bus Alternative ..................................................................................................................... 54 List of Appendices Appendix A: Commuter Data Matrix of 38 Zones from US Census LEHD Data ........................................ 60 Appendix B: Conceptual Commuter Railroad Capital Cost Estimate ......................................................... 63 Appendix C: Conceptual Commuter Railroad Operating Cost Estimate ................................................... 70 Appendix D: FTA Transit Database Costing of other Commuter Railroads ............................................... 71 List of Tables Table 1 Alabama Population 2000-2010 ................................................................................................................. 6 Table 2 Alabama Population 2020-2040 ................................................................................................................. 6 Table 3 Proposed Transit Improvements ............................................................................................................... 8 Table 4 RTP Strategies for Addressing Challenges ............................................................................................ 10 Table 5 LEHD Zones – Potential Birmingham Commuter Rail Trips ................................................................ 12 Table 6 Lineville Subdivision Characteristics........................................................................................................ 16 Table 7 Running Time CSX Rail and Improved Rail ..........................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Bus and Shared-Ride Taxi Use in Two Small Urban Areas
    Bus and Shared-Ride Taxi Use in Two Small Urban Areas David P. Middendorf, Peat, Marwick, Mitchell and Company Kenneth W. Heathington, University of Tennessee The demand for publicly owned fixed-route. fixed-schedule bus service are used for work and business-related trips to and was compared with tho demand for privately owned shared-ride taxi ser­ within CBDs and for short social, shopping, medical, vice in Davenport. Iowa, and Hicksville, New York, through on-board and personal business trips. surveys end cab company dispatch records and driver logs. The bus and In many small cities and in many suburbs of large slmrcd·ride taxi systems in Davenport com11eted for the off.peak-period travel market. During off-peak hours, the taxis tended to attract social· metropol.il;e:H!:i, l.lus~s nd taxicabs operate within tlie recreation, medical, and per onal business trips between widely scattered same jlu·isclictions and may compete for the same public origins and destinations, while the buses tended 10 attract shopping and transportation market. Two examples of small commu­ personal business trips to the CBD. The shared-ride taxi system in Hicks· nities in which buses and ta.xis coexist are Davenport, ville, in addition to providing many-to·many service, competed with the Iowa, and Hicksville, New York. The markets, eco­ counlywide bus system as a feeder system to the Long Island commuter nomic characteristics, organization, management, and railroad network. In each study area, the markets of each mode of public operation of the taxicab systems sel'Ving these commu­ transportation were similar.
    [Show full text]
  • Co M M U Te R
    RAIL COMMUTER Effective August 12, 2019 Monday – Saturday EBJ Union Station Victory Station Medical/Market Center Station Downtown Irving/ Heritage Crossing Station West Irving Station CentrePort DFW Airport Station (Fare Boundary) Bell Station Richland Hills Station Fort Worth Central Station Fort Worth T & P Station TRE Schedule booklet_AUG 2019 Designer: JH 525-008-0619 SIZE: 3.25X9 CMYK w/Bleeds TrinityRailwayExpress.org RideTrinityMetro.org DART.org 817-215-8600 214-979 -1111 DART TICKETS & PASS PRICES PRECIOS DE PASES Y BOLETOS DE DART FARES TARIFAS Fare Category FARE Categoría de tarifa TARIFA Single Ride - Local (Bus Only) $2.50 Viaje Sencillo - Local (Sólo Autobús) $2.50 Single Ride - Reduced* (Bus Only) $1.25 Viaje Sencillo - Reducido* (Sólo Autobús) $1.25 AM/PM Pass - Local $3.00 Pase AM/PM - Local $3.00 AM/PM Pass - Reduced* $1.50 Pase AM/PM - Reducido* $1.50 Midday - Local (9:30 a.m. - 2:30 p.m.) $2.00 Mediodía - Local (9:30 a.m. - 2:30 p.m.) $2.00 Day Pass - Local $6.00 Pase Diario - Local $6.00 Day Pass - Reduced* $3.00 Pase Diario - Reducido* $3.00 Day Pass - Regional $12.00 Pase Diario - Regional $12.00 Monthly Pass - Local † $96.00 Pase Mensual - Local † $96.00 Monthly Pass - Reduced* † $48.00 Pase Mensual - Reducido* † $48.00 Monthly Pass - Regional $192.00 Pase Mensual - Regional $192.00 Local: DART rail and buses; Trinity Railway Express Local: ferroviario y autobuses de DART; servicio de (TRE) service between EBJ Union Station & CentrePort Trinity Railway Express (TRE) entre EBJ Union Station y Station; GoLink & Flex service.
    [Show full text]
  • DART / TRE / Texrail / DCTA Effective: August 12, 2019
    Rail System Map DART / TRE / TEXRail / DCTA Effective: August 12, 2019 O R Parker Road P PLANO MAP LEGEND Fare ChangeDENTON — PLANO Downtown Plano Blue Line B UNT Dallas to Downtown Rowlett President George Bush Turnpike ExpresswayCentral to Denton (operated by DCTA) Red Line R Westmoreland to Parker Rd. Regional Zone Cityline/Bush P Downtown Denton TC Dallas North Tollway Green Line G 35E P LIMITED PARKING AVAILABLE 75 North Carrollton/Frankford to Buckner Med Park P Orange Line O Highland Village/Lewisville Lake DFW Airport to LBJ/Central P LIMITED PARKING AVAILABLE LBJ/Central to Parker, Galatyn Park G Old Town P Weekdays Peak Only P Parking Available North Fare Change Carrollton/ Hebron P — Trinity Railway Express Frankford George Turnpike Bush President P (No Sunday Service) ADDISON Arapaho Center P TEXRail CARROLLTON RICHARDSON 121 Regional Zone A-Train Trinity Mills P Regional Zone Fare Zone Boundry Downtown RICHARDSON Stemmons FreewayCarrollton P Regional Fares Apply 161 Spring Valley P FARMERS Regional Zone — Fare Change Only Peak Weekdays BRANCH ROWLETT P Farmers Branch P Grapevine/ GARLAND Lyndon B. Johnson Freeway Main Street Rd. Parker to LBJ/Central Line Orange B 635 635 Downtown Dallas North Tollway Downtown 114 Royal Lane P O LBJ/Central P Forest/Jupiter P 635 Garland Rowlett DFW P P P Airport Belt P 114 Line Walnut Hill/ Forest Lane P North North Irving Denton P P Lake Covention College Center 35E P Walnut Hill LBJ/Skillman Bachman P P R. L. Thornton Fwy Burbank Lake DFW DFW Las Colinas P Park Lane Highlands P 30 Airport Airport Urban P LOOP North P 12 Terminal Terminal Center Freeway Stemmons Richland Hills/ B A Lovers Lane White Rock P Smitheld DFW 161 University Inwood/ UNIVERSITY PARK of Dallas Love Field MESQUITE P North Richland P HIGHLAND 75 SMU/Mockingbird Hills/Iron Horse P 114 Southwestern PARK 183 Medical District/ Cityplace/Uptown P Mercantile Center LOOP Parkland Pearl/Arts 12 Market P District 635 P 35E LOOP North Side Center St.
    [Show full text]
  • MTA HOMELESS OUTREACH Long Island Rail Road Metro-North
    Meeting of Long Island and Metro- North Committees October 2018 Members M. Pally, Chair, LIRR Committee S. Metzger, Chair MNR Committee N. Brown R. Glucksman I. Greenberg C. Moerdler S. Rechler A. Saul V. Tessitore V. Vanterpool J. Vitiello C. Wortendyke N. Zuckerman Joint Metro-North and Long Island Committees Meeting 2 Broadway 20th Floor Board Room New York, NY Monday, 10/22/2018 8:30 - 10:00 AM ET 1. Public Comments Period 2. Approval of Minutes - September 24, 2018 LIRR Minutes LIRR Minutes - Page 5 MNR Minutes MNR Minutes - Page 14 3. 2018 Work Plans 2018 LIRR Work Plan 2018 LIRR Work Plan - Page 25 2018 MNR Work Plan 2018 MNR Work Plan - Page 32 4. PRESIDENT'S REPORT LIRR Safety Report LIRR Safety Report - Page 39 MNR Safety Report MNR Safety Report - Page 43 MTA Capital Construction Report MTA Capital Construction Report - Page 46 MTA Police Report MTA Police Report - Page 50 5. AGENCY INFORMATION ITEMS Joint Information Items 2019 Preliminary Budget (Public Comment) MTA Homeless Outreach MTA Homeless Outreach - Page 62 LIRR/MNR PTC Project Update LIRR/MNR PTC Project Update - Page 67 LIRR Information Items November Timetable Change & Trackwork Programs November Timetable Change & Trackwork Programs - Page 84 Bi-Annual Report on M-9 Procurement Bi-Annual Report on M-9 Procurement - Page 87 MNR Information Items Track Program Quarterly Update Track Program Quarterly Update - Page 103 6. PROCUREMENTS LIRR Procurements LIRR Procurements - Page 117 Non-Competitive (No Items) Competitive LIRR Competitive - Page 121 Ratifications LIRR Ratifications - Page 128 MNR Procurements MNR Procurements - Page 129 Non-Competitive MNR Non-Competitive Procurements - Page 133 Competitive (No Items) Ratifications (No Items) MTA CC Procurements MTA CC Procurements - Page 135 Non-Competitive (No Items) Competitive MTA CC Competitive - Page 138 Ratifications (No Items) 7.
    [Show full text]
  • Texrail Is Off and Running, and Here's Where to Catch It
    FRIDAY JANUARY112019 Local 3A Star Telegram,STAR-TELEGRAM.C OM1/11/2019 Cropped page Page: 3A S1 TEXRail is off and running, and here’s where to catch it Transit’s Orange Line the retired American Ea- BY GORDON DICKSON light-rail service a few gle employee said. “We fly [email protected] hundred feet away in out of the airport all the Terminal A. time.” DFW AIRPORT The commuter rail serv- After delays related to ice already was proving TEXRAIL STATIONS the federal shutdown, the popular. A T&P Station (down- long-awaited TEXRail Just after 10 a.m. Thurs- town Fort Worth) commuter line is now day, a train pulled into the 221 W. Lancaster Ave. open to anyone who wants station at the lower level Fort Worth, TX 76102 to ride it. of Terminal B carrying 67 A ITC Station (down- But where the heck are passengers. A handful town Fort Worth) the stations? carried luggage and ap- 1001 Jones St. For rail aficionados, it peared to be ready to Fort Worth, TX 76102 might seem like a simple board flights. A North Side Station question. But the simple Other riders said they (north Fort Worth) fact is, TEXRail is running just wanted to check out 2829 Decatur Ave. through parts of Northeast the quality of the train Fort Worth, TX 76106 GORDON DICKSON [email protected] Tarrant County that ride. Among them was A Mercantile Center Passengers step off a TEXRail train at DFW Airport Terminal B. The commuter rail line is haven’t had passenger Kurt Troeger, a retiree Station (north Fort Worth) now open to the public and free to ride through the end of January.
    [Show full text]
  • Passenger Rail System
    Minnesota Comprehensive Statewide Freight and Passenger Rail Plan Passenger Rail System draft technical memorandum 3 prepared for Minnesota Department of Transportation prepared by Cambridge Systematics, Inc. with Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. TKDA, Inc. July 17, 2009 www.camsys.com technical memorandum 3 Minnesota Comprehensive Statewide Freight and Passenger Rail Plan Passenger Rail System prepared for Minnesota Department of Transportation prepared by Cambridge Systematics, Inc. 100 CambridgePark Drive, Suite 400 Cambridge, Massachusetts 02140 July 17, 2009 Minnesota Comprehensive Statewide Freight and Passenger Rail Plan Passenger Rail System Technical Memorandum Table of Contents Executive Summary .............................................................................................................. ES-1 1.0 Objective ........................................................................................................................ 1-1 2.0 Methodology ................................................................................................................. 2-1 3.0 Overview of Findings .................................................................................................. 3-1 4.0 Operating and Capacity Conditions and Existing Ridership Forecasts for Potential Passenger Rail Corridors ........................................................................... 4-1 4.1 CP: Rochester-Winona......................................................................................... 4-1 4.2 CP: St. Paul-Red
    [Show full text]
  • Sounder Commuter Rail (Seattle)
    Public Use of Rail Right-of-Way in Urban Areas Final Report PRC 14-12 F Public Use of Rail Right-of-Way in Urban Areas Texas A&M Transportation Institute PRC 14-12 F December 2014 Authors Jolanda Prozzi Rydell Walthall Megan Kenney Jeff Warner Curtis Morgan Table of Contents List of Figures ................................................................................................................................ 8 List of Tables ................................................................................................................................. 9 Executive Summary .................................................................................................................... 10 Sharing Rail Infrastructure ........................................................................................................ 10 Three Scenarios for Sharing Rail Infrastructure ................................................................... 10 Shared-Use Agreement Components .................................................................................... 12 Freight Railroad Company Perspectives ............................................................................... 12 Keys to Negotiating Successful Shared-Use Agreements .................................................... 13 Rail Infrastructure Relocation ................................................................................................... 15 Benefits of Infrastructure Relocation ...................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 2015 Guideway Status Report
    This document is made available electronically by the Minnesota Legislative Reference Library as part of an ongoing digital archiving project. http://www.leg.state.mn.us/lrl/lrl.asp 2015 Legislative Report Guideway Status November 2015 PREPARED BY The Minnesota Department of Transportation 395 John Ireland Boulevard Saint Paul, Minnesota 55155-1899 Phone: 651-366-3000 Toll-Free: 1-800-657-3774 TTY, Voice or ASCII: 1-800-627-3529 In collaboration with the Metropolitan Council 390 Robert St. North St. Paul, MN 55101-1805 Phone: 651-602-1000 To request this document in an alternative format Please call 651-366-4718 or 1-800-657-3774 (Greater Minnesota). You may also send an email to [email protected]. Cover Photos: Northstar commuter rail train Source: Metro Council Green Line LRT Source: Streets MN Red Line BRT Source: Metro Council 2 Guideway Status Report November 2015 Contents Contents ......................................................................................................................................................... 3 Legislative Request........................................................................................................................................ 6 Statutory Requirement .................................................................................................................... 6 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................... 8 Statewide Planning ........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Light Rail and Tram: the European Outlook November 2019
    STATISTICS BRIEF LIGHT RAIL AND TRAM: THE EUROPEAN OUTLOOK NOVEMBER 2019 INTRODUCTION Tram and light rail systems are available in 389 cit- evolution of light rail transit (LRT) in Europe since ies around the world, with more than half of them 20151, and provides a snapshot of the situation in (204) in Europe. This Statistics Brief describes the 2018. BALTIC/ NORDIC BENELUX REGION BRITISH 12 cities GERMANY 10 cities ISLES 482 km 49 cities 645 km 9 cities 375 m pax/y. 2,966 km 700 m pax/y. 356 km 2,908 m pax/y. 196 m pax/y. POLAND 15 cities 979 km FRANCE 1,051 m pax/y. 28 cities 827 km 1,104 m pax/y. SOUTH- EASTERN WESTERN CENTRAL EUROPE MEDITERRANEAN 29 cities 29 cities EUROPE 992 km 23 cities 809 km 1,277 m pax/y. 1,240 km 623 m pax/y. 2,188 m pax/y. 1 UITP collects rail data according to a three-year cycle (Metro, LRT and Regional & Suburban Railways) 1 A REMARKABLE RENAISSANCE 180 LRT has experienced a renaissance since the new millen- 160 nium, with no less than 108 new cities (re)opening their 140 first line, of which 60 are from Europe. This does not in- 120 Asia-Pacific clude new lines in existing systems and line extensions. 100 Eurasia Europe 80 40 450 South America 60 35 400 MENA & Africa 7 40 350 North America 30 +56% 20 6 300 25 3 2 250 0 2 4 20 2 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 10 1 5 200 15 1 6 1 150 1 1 Figure 3: Evolution of LRT development (km) 2 10 1 19 19 5 100 4 2 15 11 1 5 50 2 7 5 3 0 0 RIDERSHIP pre-1985 1985-89 1990-94 1995-99 2000-04 2005-09 2010-14 2015-19 Europe North America South America With a total annual ridership in Europe of 10,422 million Eurasia Asia-Pacific MENA & Africa in 2018, LRT carries as many passengers as metros and Cumulative # systems regional/commuter rail, and 10 times more passengers 2 Figure 1: LRT system opening per half-decade, 1985-2019 than air travel in Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • Alternatives Analysis Summary Report
    Alternatives Analysis Summary Report Hennepin County Regional Railroad Authority Minnesota May 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 1 ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS 5 Alternatives Analysis Study 5 D2 Investigation 10 LPA Selection 13 NEXT STEPS 24 APPENDICES 24 BottineauTransitway Alternatives Analysis Summary Report INTRODUCTION WHAT IS THE PURPOSE OF THIS REPORT? FIGURE 1: TWIN CITIES REGIONAL TRANSITWAY SYSTEM This report summarizes the Alternatives Analysis (AA) evaluation process and recommendations for the Bot- Northstar Line continued tineau Transitway The report describes which transit Northstar Line modes, facilities, and alignments were studied and 94 why decisions were made to discontinue study of some alternatives and recommend further study of others It also describes the major steps in the decision process 94 35W 35E and who was involved 694 94 94 694 This report describes the steps leading to 694 the selection of a Locally Preferred Alter- 35W Proposed Bottineau 35E native (LPA) for the Bottineau Transitway. Minneapolis Transitway 694 The LPA is the transitway alternative that 394 Green Line St. Paul 94 the corridor’s cities, Hennepin County, 494 Blue Line (Central) and the Metropolitan Council recommend (Hiawatha) Green Line 494 for construction. (Southwest) The LPA responds to the five needs that prompted study of the Bottineau Transit- 494 way: growing travel demand, increasing traffic congestion, people who depend on 35W 35E 77 transit, limited transit service and reverse Line Orange (I-35W) commute opportunities, and regional
    [Show full text]
  • Passenger Rail Primer
    Passenger Rail Primer Thurston Passenger Rail Workgroup November 2005 Passenger Rail Characteristics This document is intended as a primer introducing and familiarizing the reader with the basic definitions of passenger rail and providing a comparison of common transit services in 2005. It was developed to facilitate a discussion of passenger rail and other transit options in the Thurston Region, in preparation of a regional rail plan. In the next section, Passenger Rail Overview, the fundamental characteristics of light rail, commuter rail and intercity rail are covered. Complementary and Alternative Transit Options (primarily common bus transit choices) provides a wider transit context within which the passenger rail modes coordinate and compete. After investigating transit options individually, they are compared and contrasted in a chart of their characteristics, Summarizing the Continuum of Services. Other Rail Transit Technologies provides a brief overview of less extensively used rail options and the Appendices provide additional details and information. Additional resources the reader may want to consult include: • The American Public Transportation Association (APTA) website at www.apta.com • The Victoria Transportation Policy Institute (VTPI) website at www.vtpi.org • Bureau of Transportation Statistics (BTS) website at www.bts.gov Passenger Rail Overview Introduction Passenger rail modes may be distinguished from one another based on a variety of characteristics – level of service, technology, right-of-way and operations. These characteristics are discussed in more detail in the other sections of this chapter. Like other transit services, however, in the most basic sense passenger rail modes break down by three distinct geographies – local, regional, and statewide or interstate.
    [Show full text]
  • September 2005 Bulletin.Pub
    TheNEW YORK DIVISION BULLETIN - SEPTEMBER, 2005 Bulletin New York Division, Electric Railroaders’ Association Vol. 48, No. 9 September, 2005 The Bulletin NEWARK CITY SUBWAY EXTENSION Published by the New York Division, Electric PROGRESS REPORT Railroaders’ Association, Incorporated, PO Box by Bruce J. Russell 3001, New York, New York 10008-3001. (Photographs by the author) Work continues on the 1.3-mile-long exten- ing completion and consists of welded rail For general inquiries, sion of the Newark City Subway from Penn atop a concrete base. In front of Broad Street contact us at nydiv@ Station to the former Lackawanna Railroad Station, trackage is likewise being installed. electricrailroaders.org or station on Broad Street, a 1904-era Italianate Work on the single-track segment on the by phone at (212) 986- 4482 (voice mail style edifice complete with clock tower. When west side of Broad Street adjacent to Wash- available). ERA’s done, riders will be able to board an LRV in ington Park is in the early stage of construc- website is Penn Station, proceed a short distance in tion, with a preliminary trench excavated. www.electricrailroaders. tunnel, and then emerge onto the surface for This track will run adjacent to the curb. org. the remainder of the journey. The installation Over $200 million is being spent on this Editorial Staff: of streetcar tracks on the streets of down- short extension of the Newark City Subway, Editor-in-Chief: town Newark marks their return for the first which is many times what the original route Bernard Linder time since about 1938, when the final lines to Franklin Avenue cost in 1937.
    [Show full text]