DOCSLIB.ORG

Alternatives Analysis Summary Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Alternatives Analysis Summary Report Alternatives Analysis Summary Report Hennepin County Regional Railroad Authority Minnesota May 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 1 ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS 5 Alternatives Analysis Study 5 D2 Investigation 10 LPA Selection 13 NEXT STEPS 24 APPENDICES 24 BottineauTransitway Alternatives Analysis Summary Report INTRODUCTION WHAT IS THE PURPOSE OF THIS REPORT? FIGURE 1: TWIN CITIES REGIONAL TRANSITWAY SYSTEM This report summarizes the Alternatives Analysis (AA) evaluation process and recommendations for the Bot- Northstar Line continued tineau Transitway The report describes which transit Northstar Line modes, facilities, and alignments were studied and 94 why decisions were made to discontinue study of some alternatives and recommend further study of others It also describes the major steps in the decision process 94 35W 35E and who was involved 694 94 94 694 This report describes the steps leading to 694 the selection of a Locally Preferred Alter- 35W Proposed Bottineau 35E native (LPA) for the Bottineau Transitway. Minneapolis Transitway 694 The LPA is the transitway alternative that 394 Green Line St. Paul 94 the corridor’s cities, Hennepin County, 494 Blue Line (Central) and the Metropolitan Council recommend (Hiawatha) Green Line 494 for construction. (Southwest) The LPA responds to the five needs that prompted study of the Bottineau Transit- 494 way: growing travel demand, increasing traffic congestion, people who depend on 35W 35E 77 transit, limited transit service and reverse Line Orange (I-35W) commute opportunities, and regional Red Line growth objectives. (Cedar) Downtown Minneapolis Inset 94 Blue Line (LRT) 35W 55 Green Line (LRT) Orange Line (BRT) WHAT IS THE BOTTINEAU TRANSITWAY? Red Line (BRT) Transit Stations 94 The Bottineau Transitway is a proposed project that Northstar Line (commuter rail) 35W Regional Multimodal Hub will provide for transit improvements in the highly trav- Miles eled northwest area of the Twin Cities The Bottineau 0 1 2 4 6 Transitway is located in Hennepin County, Minnesota, extending approximately 13 miles from downtown Min- neapolis to the northwest serving North Minneapolis and the suburbs of Golden Valley, Robbinsdale, Crys- transit (LRT) on the Blue Line (Hiawatha) and Green tal, Brooklyn Park, and Maple Grove The transitway Line (Central Corridor and the planned Southwest investment is anticipated to serve a broader area to line), bus rapid transit (BRT) on the Red Line (Cedar the northwest, including the communities of Dayton, Avenue) and Orange Line (I-35W South), the Northstar Rogers, and Hassan Township (Hassan Township was commuter rail, and express bus routes (Figure 1) The annexed into the City of Rogers on January 1, 2012 Bottineau Transitway also will maintain or enhance lo- Future reference to Rogers in this document includes cal and express bus service throughout the corridor Hassan Township ) Transportation and land use studies along the Bottin- The Bottineau Transitway will connect North Minne- eau Corridor began in 1988 with the Hennepin Coun- apolis and the region’s northwest suburbs with the ty Comprehensive LRT System Plan The Bottineau region’s system of transitways that consist of light rail (Northwest) Transitway has consistently been included 1 Alternatives Analysis Summary Report BottineauTransitway in regional transportation system plans In 2008, the the Bottineau Transitway through the FTA New Starts Bottineau corridor was one of 29 corridors analyzed program for their potential for commuter rail or LRT/BRT invest- ments in the Metropolitan Council’s Transit Master WHO PARTICIPATED IN THE LPA SELECTION Study The study concluded that the Bottineau corridor PROCESS? should continue to be advanced toward implementa- The Hennepin County Regional Railroad Authority tion. This conclusion is reflected in the region’s current (HCRRA), in consultation with the Metropolitan Council long-range transportation plan, the 2030 Transporta- and the FTA, is serving as the local lead agency for the tion Policy Plan (adopted in 2010), which identifies the Bottineau Transitway AA Throughout the AA process, Bottineau Transitway as one of the transit corridors to there has been active engagement with the public and be developed by 2030 as LRT, Busway, Highway BRT, project advisory committees Some of the most active or Commuter Rail local agency partners participate on the project com- WHAT IS AN ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS? mittees described below (Figure 2) An AA is a federal process for the local evaluation of FIGURE 2: AA STUDY PARTNERS the costs, benefits, and impacts of transit alternatives designed to address mobility problems and other lo- cally-identified objectives in a transportation corridor. It is used to identify the investment strategy to be ad- vanced for more focused study and development For AA studies which may result in the local selection of a project eligible for Federal Transit Administration (FTA) New Starts or Small Starts funding, the AA fur- ther serves as the process for developing the technical information necessary to support a project’s entry into New Starts preliminary engineering The AA process concludes with the selection of a locally preferred al- ternative (LPA) that is amended into the regional long range plan WHAT IS A LOCALLY PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE? Advise, Review, and Communicate Committee The LPA is the transitway alternative that the corridor’s h (ARCC): ARCC members are technical staff from cities, counties, and the Metropolitan Council recom- agencies convened to advise on project develop- mend for construction. The LPA specifies both the type ment The ARCC provides advice regarding local of transit that will be used (mode) and the location governmental perspectives, issues of concern, (alignment) Other elements of the project, including technical methodologies, and study process de- termini and final station locations, are established tails The ARCC is comprised of staff from Hennepin formally during subsequent engineering based on ad- County, the cities of Brooklyn Park, Crystal, Golden ditional information, including opening year travel de- Valley, New Hope, Maple Grove, Minneapolis, Os- mand forecasts The selection of an LPA tells the FTA seo, and Robbinsdale; Maple Grove Transit; the which alternative local agencies expect to be the most competitive in achieving support at the local, regional, and federal levels. Identification of an LPA is a critical step to pursue federal funding The selection of an LPA for the Bottineau Transitway and amendment of it into the region’s long-range transportation plan marks the end of the AA process Concluding the AA process al- lows the project to pursue federal funding under the federal SAFETEA-LU transportation program It is ex- pected that the region will pursue federal funding for BottineauTransitway Alternatives Analysis Summary Report 2 Metropolitan Council, Metro Transit, MnDOT; the FIGURE 3: EVALUATION CRITERIA FOR BOTTINEAU Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board; and proj- TRANSITWAY PROJECT ect consultants h Community Advisory Committee (CAC): Members represent communities, businesses, and institu- tions in the Bottineau Transitway study area CAC members provide a conduit for integrating the val- ues and perspectives of citizens, communities, businesses and institutions into the study process h Policy Advisory Committee (PAC): PAC members are elected officials, key policy leaders for partici- pating agencies, business leaders, and institutional leaders, convened to review project development progress and advise progress toward identifying an LPA Members of the public participated through attendance at public meetings and hearings at several points dur- ing the process as discussed later in this report WHAT CRITERIA WERE USED TO MAKE DECISIONS? Three sets of evaluation criteria form the frame- work for decisions leading to the selection of an LPA (Figure 3): h The Bottineau Transitway purpose and need, and goals and objectives (local criteria); h The Metropolitan Council transitway capital invest- ment criteria, discussed in the Metropolitan Coun- cil’s Regional Transitway Guidelines (regional crite- ria); and During its course, the AA Study success- h The Federal Transit Administration (FTA) New Starts fully engaged stakeholders through public project justification criteria (national criteria) meetings, open houses, presentations, The purpose of the Bottineau Transitway is stated as email, website visits, and phone calls. follows: The purpose of the Bottineau Transitway Nearly 1,000 stakeholders attended meet- is to provide transit service which will satisfy the ings or submitted comments during this long-term regional mobility and accessibility needs time. for businesses and the traveling public. Five fac- tors contribute to the need for the project: growing A large number of transit modes and align- travel demand, increasing traffic congestion, people ments were considered early in the AA who depend on transit, limited transit service to sub- Study. Those with the potential to address urban destinations (reverse commute opportunities) the project needs, goals, and objectives and time-efficient transit options, and regional objec- were evaluated in detail. Four LRT alterna- tives for growth stated in the Regional Development tives and one BRT alternative were ad- Framework vanced for further consideration. 3 Alternatives Analysis Summary Report BottineauTransitway The Bottineau Transitway project goals and objectives They serve as a framework to develop and then are shown in Table 1 These were
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Passenger Rail System
    Minnesota Comprehensive Statewide Freight and Passenger Rail Plan Passenger Rail System draft technical memorandum 3 prepared for Minnesota Department of Transportation prepared by Cambridge Systematics, Inc. with Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. TKDA, Inc. July 17, 2009 www.camsys.com technical memorandum 3 Minnesota Comprehensive Statewide Freight and Passenger Rail Plan Passenger Rail System prepared for Minnesota Department of Transportation prepared by Cambridge Systematics, Inc. 100 CambridgePark Drive, Suite 400 Cambridge, Massachusetts 02140 July 17, 2009 Minnesota Comprehensive Statewide Freight and Passenger Rail Plan Passenger Rail System Technical Memorandum Table of Contents Executive Summary .............................................................................................................. ES-1 1.0 Objective ........................................................................................................................ 1-1 2.0 Methodology ................................................................................................................. 2-1 3.0 Overview of Findings .................................................................................................. 3-1 4.0 Operating and Capacity Conditions and Existing Ridership Forecasts for Potential Passenger Rail Corridors ........................................................................... 4-1 4.1 CP: Rochester-Winona......................................................................................... 4-1 4.2 CP: St. Paul-Red
    [Show full text]
  • 2015 Guideway Status Report
    This document is made available electronically by the Minnesota Legislative Reference Library as part of an ongoing digital archiving project. http://www.leg.state.mn.us/lrl/lrl.asp 2015 Legislative Report Guideway Status November 2015 PREPARED BY The Minnesota Department of Transportation 395 John Ireland Boulevard Saint Paul, Minnesota 55155-1899 Phone: 651-366-3000 Toll-Free: 1-800-657-3774 TTY, Voice or ASCII: 1-800-627-3529 In collaboration with the Metropolitan Council 390 Robert St. North St. Paul, MN 55101-1805 Phone: 651-602-1000 To request this document in an alternative format Please call 651-366-4718 or 1-800-657-3774 (Greater Minnesota). You may also send an email to [email protected]. Cover Photos: Northstar commuter rail train Source: Metro Council Green Line LRT Source: Streets MN Red Line BRT Source: Metro Council 2 Guideway Status Report November 2015 Contents Contents ......................................................................................................................................................... 3 Legislative Request........................................................................................................................................ 6 Statutory Requirement .................................................................................................................... 6 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................... 8 Statewide Planning ........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Performance Evaluation Report Report to the Minnesota Legislature
    This document is made available electronically by the Minnesota Legislative Reference Library as part of an ongoing digital archiving project. http://www.leg.state.mn.us/lrl/lrl.asp 2019 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT REPORT TO THE MINNESOTA LEGISLATURE November 2020 The Council’s mission is to foster efficient and economic growth for a prosperous metropolitan region Metropolitan Council Members Charlie Zelle, Chair Raymond Zeran, District 9 Judy Johnson, District 1 Peter Lindstrom, District 10 Reva Chamblis, District 2 Susan Vento, District 11 Christopher Ferguson, District 3 Francisco J. Gonzalez, District 12 Deb Barber, District 4 Chai Lee, District 13 Molly Cummings, District 5 Kris Fredson, District 14 Lynnea Atlas-Ingebretson, District 6 Phillip Sterner, District 15 Robert Lilligren. District 7 Wendy Wulff, District 16 Abdirahman Muse, District 8 The Metropolitan Council is the regional planning organization for the seven-county Twin Cities area. The Council operates the regional bus and rail system, collects and treats wastewater, coordinates regional water resources, plans and helps fund regional parks, and administers federal funds that provide housing opportunities for low- and moderate- income individuals and families. The 17-member Council board is appointed by and serves at the pleasure of the governor. On request, this publication will be made available in alternative formats to people with disabilities. Call Metropolitan Council information at 651- 602-1140 or TTY 651-291-0904. Metropolitan Council 2019 Performance Evaluation Report About This Report The Metropolitan Council recognizes performance evaluation as a key tool to ensure that its functions meet their objectives in a timely and cost-effective manner.
    [Show full text]
  • November 15, 2017 the Honorable Paul
    This document is made available electronically by the Minnesota Legislative Reference Library as part of an ongoing digital archiving project. http://www.leg.state.mn.us/lrl/lrl.asp November 15, 2017 The Honorable Paul Torkelson, Chair The Honorable Scott Newman, Chair House Transportation Finance Committee Senate Transportation Finance & Policy Committee 381 State Office Building 3105 Minnesota Senate Building Saint Paul, MN 55155 Saint Paul, MN 55155 The Honorable Linda Runbeck, Chair The Honorable Scott Dibble House Transportation & Regional Governance Policy Ranking Minority Member Committee Senate Transportation Finance & Policy Committee 417 State Office Building 2213 Minnesota Senate Building Saint Paul, MN 55155 Saint Paul, MN 55155 The Honorable Frank Hornstein, DFL Lead The Honorable Connie Bernardy, DFL Lead House Transportation Policy & Finance Committee House Transportation & Regional Governance Policy 243 State Office Building Committee Saint Paul, MN 55155 253 State Office Building Saint Paul, MN 55155 RE: 2017 Guideway Status report Dear Legislators: The Minnesota Department of Transportation, in collaboration with the Metropolitan Council, is pleased to provide the 2017 Guideway Status report as required under 2016 Minnesota Statutes 174.93, subdivision 2. This report updates information for eight guideway corridors currently in operation, construction or design, and thirteen more that are in planning or analysis phase, or that were at the time of the last report in 2015. The capacity analysis looks at regional guideway funding needs and resources related to capital, operations and capital maintenance for the next ten years. If you have specific questions about this report or want additional information, please contact MnDOT’s Brian Isaacson at [email protected] or at 651 234-7783; or, you can contact Met Council’s Cole Hiniker at [email protected] or at 651 602-1748.
    [Show full text]
  • Video Surveillance Uses by Rail Transit Agencies Rail Transit Agencies Sponsored by the Federal Transit Administration
    Job No. XXXX Pantone 648 92+ pages; Perfect Bind with SPINE COPY = 14 pts ADDRESS SERVICE REQUESTED Washington, D.C. 20001 500 Fifth Street, N.W. TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD TCRP SYNTHESIS 90 TRANSIT COOPERATIVE RESEARCH TCRP PROGRAM SYNTHESIS 90 Video Surveillance Uses by Video Surveillance Uses by Rail Transit Agencies Rail Transit Agencies Sponsored by the Federal Transit Administration A Synthesis of Transit Practice TRB NEED SPINE WIDTH ACRP OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE* TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD 2009 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE* Abbreviations and acronyms used without definitions in TRB publications: CHAIR OFFICERS AAAE American Association of Airport Executives James Wilding CHAIR: Adib K. Kanafani, Cahill Professor of Civil Engineering, University of California, Berkeley AASHO American Association of State Highway Officials Independent Consultant VICE CHAIR: Michael R. Morris, Director of Transportation, North Central Texas Council of AASHTO American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials Governments, Arlington ACI–NA Airports Council International–North America VICE CHAIR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR: Robert E. Skinner, Jr., Transportation Research Board ACRP Airport Cooperative Research Program Jeff Hamiel ADA Americans with Disabilities Act Minneapolis–St. Paul MEMBERS APTA American Public Transportation Association Metropolitan Airports Commission ASCE American Society of Civil Engineers J. Barry Barker, Executive Director, Transit Authority of River City, Louisville, KY ASME American Society of Mechanical Engineers MEMBERS Allen D. Biehler, Secretary, Pennsylvania DOT, Harrisburg ASTM American Society for Testing and Materials James Crites Larry L. Brown, Sr., Executive Director, Mississippi DOT, Jackson ATA Air Transport Association Dallas–Fort Worth International Airport Deborah H. Butler, Executive Vice President, Planning, and CIO, Norfolk Southern Corporation, ATA American Trucking Associations Richard de Neufville Norfolk, VA CTAA Community Transportation Association of America Massachusetts Institute of Technology William A.V.
    [Show full text]
  • Transit Guide for Minneapolis Visitors
    August 2015 TRANSIT GUIDE FOR MINNEAPOLIS VISITORS 11 61 6 4 2nd St NE 1st Ave 61 4th St SE 6 Main 4 25 17 6 10 Hennepin University Ave River Place 6 6 2nd St SE 4 6 1st St Bryant 4 Main 5 Central Ave 22 5th Ave St. Anthony Main Olson Memorial Hwy 19 6th Ave 12 5th St 6 3 2nd St 14 Target Field Station N 11 1st St Washingto West River Pkwy Mississippi River Main Northstar Line Platform N e N 59 TargetT tF Fieldild 1st Ave 25 LEGEND Target Field AvAve Ramp C 17 Platform 2 Platform 1 7th St 3rd Ave n 7 10 5th Ave N 3rd St 4th St e N 14 0 2.5 5 5 3 2nd Ave 19 Walking time (minutes) 22 St. Anthony Falls 4th Ave Bryant 14 12 7 6 METRO Green Line Target Field 3 Farmers 3 2nd St approximately every 10 minutes 4 1st St throughout the day; every 10-15 Market Blue Line 11 minutes evenings; every 30-60 Ramp B/5th Street Green Line Royalston Warehouse District/ Transit Center Washingto minutes overnight. Hennepin Avenue Minneapolis 3rd St Stone Arch Bridge Central The Depot Marquette METRO Blue Line Border 14 n N Library Minneapolis Mill Ruins approximately every 10 minutes 94 Park Milwaukee during weekday rush hours; 94 1st Ave 4th St 2nd Ave S Residence every 10 minutes midday; Target Cowles Road Depot We Inn st Center Center Riv every 15 minutes evenings. Twins Way 5 5th St er 3rd Ave S 18 P 19 59 kw Loews y METRO Station Glenwood 22 Nicollet Mall 11 94 Hotel Hennepin 25 Mill City 4th Ave Gateway Mayo Clinic 6th St 3 18 7 Museum Northstar Commuter Rail Ramp A/7th Street First Transit Center 94 7 Transit Center Avenue Square 17 22 Colfax 14 Hotels
    [Show full text]
  • A Practitioner's Handbook for Conducting a Commuter Rail Case Study
    Project Title: A Practitioner's Handbook for Conducting a Commuter Rail Case Study NITC-XX-### by Ivis Garcia, PhD (PI) Mercedes Beaudoin Ja Young Kim Kathryn Terzano, PhD Metropolitan Research Center University of Utah for National Institute for Transportation and Communities (NITC) P.O. Box August 2016 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This research was funded by the National Institute for Transportation and Communities (NITC), in addition to The Wasatch Front Regional Council and The Ivory Boyer Real Estate Center at the University of Utah. Additional support and contributions came from Simon Brewer in the University of Utah’s Geography Department and from Danny Wall in the University of Utah’s Finance Department. Furthermore, we acknowledge and thank the anonymous peer reviewers who provided immensely helpful insights and corrections to this report. DISCLAIMER The contents of this report reflect the views of the authors, who are solely responsible for the facts and the accuracy of the material and information presented herein. This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the U.S. Department of Transportation University Transportation Centers Program and the partners mentioned above in the acknowledgements in the interest of information exchange. The U.S. Government and mentioned partners assumes no liability for the contents or use thereof. The contents do not necessarily reflect the official views of the U.S. Government or the other partners. This report does not constitute a standard, specification, or regulation. Introduction Professional planners use a variety of information and knowledge sources to help make the most educated decisions. However, these sources often do not fully or clearly integrate cutting-edge planning research into planning practice.
    [Show full text]
  • Existing and Planned Transitways
    Big Lake Elk River Ramsey Anoka Coon Rapids/Riverdale MISSISSIPPI RIVER Oak Grove Pkwy Existing and Planned 93rd Ave BROOKLYN PARK 85th Ave Transitways Brooklyn Blvd Fridley 63rd Ave TWIN LAKE Brooklyn Center Transit Center Bass Lake Rd CRYSTAL LAKE Robbinsdale C D Van Golden Valley Rd Penn White Ave Blvd Rosedale Transit Center Plymouth Avenue/Theodore Wirth Park Target Field Warehouse District/Hennepin Ave Royalston Ave/Farmers Market Nicollet Mall A 3rd St Bassett Creek Valley 5th St Downtown Government Plaza Bryn Mawr Minneapolis 7th St U.S. Bank Stadium 11th St West 21st St West BankEast BankStadium Village Prospect Park West Lake St Westgate Cedar-Riverside Raymond Ave Beltline Blvd LAKE CALHOUN Franklin Ave Fairview Ave Snelling AveHamline AveLexingtonVictoria Pkwy StDale St Western Capitol/RiceAve St Wooddale Ave Lake St Lake St/Midtown Downtown Robert St St. Paul Louisiana Ave LAKE HARRIET 38th St Mounds BlvdEarl St Etna St White BearSun Ave Ray MaplewoodGreenwayHelmo Ave Ave 10th St Blake Rd ST. PAUL 46th St MISSISSIPPI RIVER Tamarack 46th St Central Downtown Hopkins MINNEAPOLIS Union 50th St/Minnehaha Park Depot Woodbury Theatre Shady Oak VA Medical Center WOODBURY Opus Fort Snelling 66th St City West Terminal 1–Lindbergh Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport SouthWest Golden Triangle 76th St Terminal 2–Humphrey Station Mall of American Blvd American Blvd America Eden Prairie Town Center Existing Transitways and Stations 28th Bloomington Ave Central METRO Blue Line (LRT) EDEN PRARIE 98th St METRO Green Line (LRT) METRO
    [Show full text]
  • Minneapolis- St. Paul
    Northstar Line to Big Lake Legend Anoka METRO Light Rail Station Coon Rapids-Riverdale Minneapolis- Blue Line Street Stop Oak Grove Pkwy N Green Line Transfer Station METRO Bus Rapid Transit Line Terminus St. Paul 93rd Ave Under Construction Red Line (C) Metro85th Ave Route Atlas 2019Northstar Commuter Rail USA Orange Line (u/c) Brooklyn Blvd Northstar Line A A Line Sept 2019 C C Line 63rd Ave C Brooklyn Center Transit Center Bass Lake Rd Xerxes & 56th Ave Fridley © Andrew Fan (Metro Route Atlas) 2019 This is NOT an official map and may be out of date. Map is not to scale. (C) MetroMississippi River Route Atlas 2019 Brooklyn & 51st Ave Penn & 43rd Ave Penn & Dowling Robbinsdale (C) MetroPenn & 36th Ave Route Atlas 2019 Penn & Lowry A Rosedale Transit Center Penn & 29th Ave Penn & W. Broadway Snelling & Co Rd B Golden Valley Penn & Golden Valley (C) Metro Route SnellingAtlas & Larpenteur 2019 Plymouth/Theodore Penn & Plymouth Wirth Park Target Field Van White Snelling & Hoyt-Nebraska Warehouse District/ Penn Hennepin Nicollet Mall Snelling & Como Olson & 7th 3rd St Olson & Penn Gov't Plaza (C) MetroOlsonRoyalston & Bryant Hennepin RouteStadium Atlas 2019 Olson & HumboldtFarmers Mkt 7th St 5th St W. Bank Village Snelling & Hewitt Bassett Creek Valley Prospect Nicollet US Bank E. Bank Bryn Mawr Stadium Park 11th St 3rd/4th Cedar-Riverside Snelling & Minnehaha Ave Westgate Park C West 21st St Lexington (C) Metro RouteFranklin Raymond HamlineAtlasVictoria Western Robert 2019 Fairview Snelling & Dale Capitol/ 10th St West Lake St Lake University Rice Lake St/ Union Depot Midtown Snelling & Dayton Central Beltline Blvd Snelling & Grand 38th St Snelling & St.
    [Show full text]
  • Light Rail Update
    Big Lake Elk River Ramsey Anoka Coon Rapids Oak Grove Parkway OSSEO METRO Blue Line (LRT): Open 93rd Ave M ISSI METRO Red Line (BRT): Open SS BROOKLYN IPPI METRO Green Line (LRT): Open PARK RI (BRT): Est. 2019 V METRO Orange Line E 85th Ave R METRO Green Line extension (LRT): 2018 METRO Blue Line extension (LRT): TBD METRO Red Line extension (BRT): TBD Brooklyn Blvd Station under consideration Station Fridley BROOKLYN Metro Transit Northstar Line (commuter rail) CENTER updated 11/11/14 63rd Ave CRYSTAL Bass Lake Rd ROBBINSDALE Robbinsdale e v in A p e nn Golden e H Valley Rd t/ e e c a v it i z GOLDEN h tr la st e s a g n A d ll t P a k VALLEY n n Wlv a ill r e a e Di n E k k a P V s w n n Plymouth Ave u t M men o a a m V t P B o le n t u c h l r t B t B i re o e wn s s pe a ic v o e a tad s o E S ro te W N G D W P a e g v Target Field st e d A y t W w mon e e e k e e S Royalston y v v v t v ic - a n P R t r R e A o n A / MINNEAPOLIS a w A g A n t ia S t r l t S Van White d ie in li g r e to r e e v ll in o t i e d r m x t e S s p b C i ai ne a e ic al e a o rs F S H L V D W C R Penn e v n Ri li k t n e 21st St ra v h S Lake St F A t 10 l a t/ tr n e S en West Lake k w C Union Depot a to L id t M Beltline th S 8 3 t ST.
    [Show full text]
  • COMMUTER RAIL Commuter Rail Is Passenger Rail Service That Is Designed to Transport Large Volumes of Passengers Over Long Distances in a Fast and Comfortable Manner
    TRANSIT STRATEGIES COMMUTER RAIL Commuter rail is passenger rail service that is designed to transport large volumes of passengers over long distances in a fast and comfortable manner. The primary market for commuter rail service is usually commuters to and from city centers. However, many commuter rail lines also provide regional and all day service. The major benefits of commuter rail service are: è Comfortable and fast service, often faster than driving è Easy to understand and use è Efficient way to transport large volumes of people MINNEAPOLIS NORTHSTAR NASHVILLE MUSIC CITY STAR Common elements of commuter rail service include: § Vehicles: Most American commuter rail trains consist of a locomotive and multiple passenger cars, but some consist of multiple self-propelled cars. Most American commuter rail systems are diesel-powers, but a few are electric-powered. § Length: Most commuter rail lines are designed to serve long distance travel, and lines that range from 20 to 50 miles are most common. § Station Spacing: To provide competitive travel times, stations are spaced widely apart, typically every three to five miles, and often longer. § Access and Station Facilities: Most commuter rail stations rely heavily on park and ride access, and thus most include parking, and many facilities can be very large. Other station facilities include platforms, and depending upon boarding volumes, either simple shelters or enclosed waiting areas. They also commonly include other elements such as real-time passenger information, ticket vending, and bicycle parking. § Capacity: Commuter rail coaches can be either single or double level. Single level coaches can seat up to 125 passengers and bi-levels coaches can seat up to 185 passengers.
    [Show full text]
  • Commuter Rail Transit and Economic Development Arthur C. Nelson
    Commuter Rail Transit and Economic Development Arthur C. Nelson Professor of Planning and Real Estate Development College of Architecture, Planning and Landscape Architecture 1040 N. Olive Road University of Arizona Tucson, AZ 85719 E: [email protected] V: 520.621.4004 Acknowledgement and Disclaimer Support for this article came from the National Institute of Transportation and Communities. Co- sponsors included the Utah Transit Authority, Portland Metro, TriMet, Lane County Transit, City of Ogden, Utah, City of Provo, Utah, Transportation for America (a subsidiary of Smart Growth America), City of Tucson, Regional Transportation Commission of Southern Nevada, and Mid America Regional Council. The contents of this article reflect the views of the authors, who are solely responsible for the facts and the accuracy of the material and information presented herein. November 2017 1 Commuter Rail Transit and Economic Development Abstract Commuter rail transit (CRT) is a form of rail passenger service connecting suburbs and more distant areas to downtowns and other major activity centers. Between 1834 and 1973, only three public CRT systems were built in the U.S., serving New York, Chicago, and later Boston. But 2016, there were 29 public CRT systems. Modern CRT systems aim to expand economic development in metropolitan areas. But do they? This article evaluates the economic development performance of five modern CRT systems built in the South and West: “Tri Rail” connecting the metropolitan areas of Miami and West Palm Beach, Florida; “Rail Runner “connecting the metropolitan areas of Albuquerque and Santa Fe, New Mexico; “FrontRunner” connecting the metropolitan areas of Ogden and Salt Lake City, Utah; “Coaster” serving metropolitan San Diego; and “Sounder” connecting the metropolitan areas of Tacoma and Seattle.
    [Show full text]