Downtown East / North Loop Master Plan

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Downtown East / North Loop Master Plan CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS PLANNING DEPARTMENT DOWNTOWN EAST / NORTH LOOP MASTER PLAN ADOPTED OCTOBER 2003 CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS PLANNING DEPARTMENT DOWNTOWN EAST / NORTH LOOP MASTER PLAN 10/10/03 A special thanks to all of the citizens, property owners, The Honorable R.T. Rybak, Mayor Carol Lezotte, Hennepin County Community Works business owners, and interested individuals who Karen Lyons, Metropolitan Council attended the public meetings and participated in the Minneapolis City Council: Wayne Olson, Minneapolis Community Development Agency public process for this project. Paul Ostrow, City Council President Dick Victor, Minneapolis Community Development Agency Robert Lilligren, City Council Vice President Jon Wertjes, City of Minneapolis Department of Public Works CHAPTER 1 Paul Zerby Donald Samuels Steering Committee: Barbara Johnson Lindsey Alexander, City of Minneapolis Department of Finance Natalie Johnson Lee Gregory Anderson, The Star Tribune Company Dean Zimmermann Margo Ashmore, East Downtown Council Lisa Goodman Allan Bernard, Council Staff, Ward 2 Gary Schiff Kelley Brandt, Valspar Corporation CHAPTER 2 Dan Niziolek Burton Dahlberg, Kraus-Anderson Companies Scott Benson Tom Daniel, MCDA, Industry Square Project Committee Sandy Colvin Roy Douglas Gardner, Council Staff, Ward 7 Barret Lane Nancy Gaschott/Brian Bergee, Open Book Center James Grabak, North Loop Association Minneapolis City Planning Commission: Sam Grabarski, Minneapolis Downtown Council CHAPTER 3 Judith Martin, President Michael Harristhal, Hennepin County Medical Center Michael Hohmann, Vice President Judy Hollander, Hennepin County Property Services Monique Mackenzie, Secretary Mike Kimble, Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board Audrey Johnson William Lester, Metropolitan Sports Facilities Commission Gretchen Johnson Amy Lucas, Minneapolis Planning Department Michael Krause Steve Mahowald, MetroTransit CHAPTER 4 Rod Krueger Mark Moller, Downtown Minneapolis Neighborhood Association Robert Lashomb Fred Neet, Minneapolis Planning Department Gary Schiff Kit Richardson, SchaferRichardson, Inc. Annie Young Cathy Spann, Council Staff, Ward 5 Scott Wende, Hokanson/Lunning/Wende Associates Minneapolis Planning Department: Chuck Ballentine, Planning Director Consultant Team: CHAPTER 5 Pamela Miner, Community Planning Supervisor Gary Andrishak, IBI Group, Project Manager Jack Byers, Principal Planner/Project Manager Mark Koegler, Hoisington Koegler Group Inc., Assistant Project Manager Rosemarie Triplett, Administrative Support Staff Jim Benshoof, Benshoof & Associates Inc. Funding Partners: Eric Blodgett, Hoisington Koegler Group Inc. Minneapolis Planning Department Marsha Bousquet, IBI Group CHAPTER 6 Minneapolis Community Development Agency Rusty Fifield, Hoisington Koegler Group Inc. Metropolitan Council Sam Lanterman, IBI Group Thrivent Financial Lillian Leatham, Hoisington Koegler Group Inc. Hennepin County Rob MacDonald, IBI Group Hennepin County Medical Center Dick Paik, Bonz/REA Metropolitan Sports Facilities Commission Warren Rempel, IBI Group CHAPTER 7 Kraus-Anderson Companies Brad Scheib, Hoisington Koegler Group Inc. Michael Schroeder, Hoisington Koegler Group Inc. Technical Advisory Committee: Allen Yu, IBI Group David Fields, Elliot Park Neighborhood, Inc. Cliff Habeck, Thrivent Financial ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS i CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS PLANNING DEPARTMENT DOWNTOWN EAST / NORTH LOOP MASTER PLAN 10/10/03 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS i CHAPTER 4 – LAND USE PLAN 31 TABLE OF CONTENTS ii Formulation of Development Precincts 32 LIST OF FIGURES iii CHAPTER 1 Exploration of Alternative Land Use Scenarios 32 CHAPTER 1 – INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND 1 Highlights of the Recommended Land Use Plan 35 CHAPTER 2 Project Work Plan and Process 2 CHAPTER 5 – URBAN DESIGN PLAN 48 Organization of the Master Plan 2 Shaping the City through the Design of the Public Realm 49 Project Area Boundaries 6 Case Studies for Strategic Urban Design Projects 68 CHAPTER 3 Concurrent Planning Efforts 7 Opportunities for Developing View Corridors and Gateways 81 CHAPTER 2 – PLANNING COMPLETE COMMUNITIES 9 Shaping the City through the Design of Buildings 96 CHAPTER 4 Transit Oriented Development (TOD) 10 CHAPTER 6 – LOCAL REGULATORY FRAMEWORK 107 Mixed-Use Development 12 Existing Downtown Zoning District Designations 108 Downtown Housing 12 CHAPTER 5 Mixed-Use Zoning in Downtown Minneapolis 115 Transportation, Transit, and Parking 19 Enhancements to the Downtown Regulatory Framework 118 CHAPTER 3 – MARKET ANALYSIS 22 CHAPTER 7 – PHASING AND IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 125 CHAPTER 6 Regional Development Issues 23 Infrastructure Investments in the Project Area 126 Development Forecasts and Issues 25 Property Development in the Project Area 128 CHAPTER 7 Other Issues 30 TABLE OF CONTENTS ii CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS PLANNING DEPARTMENT DOWNTOWN EAST / NORTH LOOP MASTER PLAN 10/10/03 Figure 1.1 Work Program and Process 2 Figure 5.7 Refining the Skyway System 59 Figure 1.2 Map of Hiawatha Light Rail Transit (LRT) Corridor Map 3 Figure 5.8 Map of Streetscape and Open Space Plan 61 Figure 1.3 Map of Project Area 5 Figure 5.9 Streetscape and Open Space 62 Figure 1.4 Aerial Photo of Project Area 8 Figure 5.10 Examples of Reforestation 65 Figure 5.11 Reforestation: Sample Solutions 1 66 CHAPTER 1 Figure 2.1 Mixed-Use Development Illustrative Sketch 11 Figure 5.12 Reforestation: Sample Solutions 2 67 Figure 2.2 Mixed-Use Development Typologies 13 Figure 5.13 5th Street Streetscape: Block Configurations 1 69 Figure 2.3 Single Residence Occupancy Floor Plan 14 Figure 5.14 5th Street Streetscape: Block Configurations 2 70 Figure 2.4 Co-housing Residential Floor Plan 14 Figure 5.15 5th Street Streetscape: View Looking east from Government Figure 2.5 Residential Typologies & and Densities 16 Station toward Metrodome Plaza 71 Figure 2.6 Attributes of Mixed-Use Retail 17 Figure 5.16 5th Street Streetscape: Proposed Street Furniture 73 CHAPTER 2 Figure 5.17 5th Street Streetscape: Typical Sidewalk Plans 74 Figure 3.1 Map of Downtown Minneapolis Market Analysis Area 24 Figure 5.18 5th Street Streetscape: Typical Sidewalk Details 75 Figure 3.2 Development Niches and Locations 26 Figure 5.19 Revising the Physical Impact of Local Megastructures – Plan 78 Figure 3.3 Development Forecasts: – Downtown Minneapolis: 2002-2022 28 Figure 5.20 Revising the Physical Impact of Local Megastructures – Detail 79 Figure 5.21 Map of Gateways into Downtown East and the North Loop 82 Figure 4.1 Map of Development Precincts 33 Figure 5.22 Photos: Gateways into Downtown East and the North Loop 83 CHAPTER 3 Figure 4.2 Maps of Land Use Alternatives 1 and 2: Not Recommended 36 Figure 5.23 Map of Lighted Gateway Spires 84 Figure 4.3 Map of Recommended Land Use – Core Expansion 37 Figure 5.24 Photos of Lighted Gateway Spires 85 Figure 4.4 Map of Recommended Land Use – At-Grade Retail 38 Figure 5.25 Map of Gateway Transition Zones 86 Figure 4.5 Development Precinct 1: Elliot Park West 39 Figure 5.26 Photos: Gateway Transition Zones 87 Figure 4.6 Development Precinct 2: Hennepin County Medical Center 39 Figure 5.27 Prototypes for Gateway Icons 1 88 Figure 4.7 Development Precinct 3: Elliot Park East 39 Figure 5.28 Prototypes for Gateway Icons 2 89 CHAPTER 4 Figure 4.8 Development Precinct 4: Washington East 40 Figure 5.29 Map of Gateway Views to Downtown Landmarks 90 Figure 4.9 Development Precinct 5: Washington Village 40 Figure 5.30 Photos: Gateway Views to Downtown Landmarks 91 Figure 4.10 Development Precinct 6: Metrodome Site 40 Figure 5.31 Map of Enhancing Existing View Corridors 92 Figure 4.11 Development Precinct 7: 5th Street Spine 41 Figure 5.32 Photos of Enhancing Existing View Corridors 93 Figure 4.12 Development Precinct 8: Downtown Core Expansion 41 Figure 5.33 Map of Enhancing Existing View Corridors to Hennepin Avenue 94 Figure 4.13 Development Precinct 9: West Hennepin 42 Figure 5.34 Photos of Enhancing Existing View Corridors to Hennepin Avenue 95 CHAPTER 5 Figure 4.14 Development Precinct 10: Warehouse West 42 Figure 5.35 Density / Floor Area Ratios 97 Figure 4.15 Development Precinct 11: Freeway West 42 Figure 5.36 Building Height Classifications – Ground Floor 98 Figure 4.16 Development Precinct 12: Municipal Service 43 Figure 5.37 Building Height Classifications – Low-rise 98 Figure 4.17 Development Precinct 13: Air Rights Development District Over Figure 5.38 Building Height Classifications – Mid-rise 98 “The Cut” 43 Figure 5.39 Building Height Classifications – High-rise 98 Figure 4.18 Metrodome Re-Use Illustrative – Aerial View 45 Figure 5.40 Plan Typologies for Building Massing 100 CHAPTER 6 Figure 4.19 Possible Air Rights Development over “The Cut” – Aerial View 46 Figure 5.41 Building Massing Options 102 Figure 4.20 Possible Air Rights Development over “The Cut” – Cross-section 47 Figure 5.42 Massing Model of Project Area: Looking Northwest from above Looking North I-35 / I-94 Commons 103 Figure 5.43 Massing Model of Project Area: Looking Southeast from above Figure 5.1 Map of Metropolitan Area Multi-Modal Transit Plan 2025 Map 50 the North Loop 104 Figure 5.2 Map of Additions to the Downtown Street Grid 52 Figure 5.44 Massing Model of Project Area: Downtown East from above the CHAPTER 7 Figure 5.3 Map of Extensions to the Downtown Bicycle Network 54 Milwaukee Road Depot 105 Figure 5.4 Map of Designated Primary Pedestrian Corridors 56 Figure 5.45 Massing Model: The North Loop from above the intersection of Figure 5.5 Developing Primary Pedestrian Corridors 57 Hennepin Avenue and Washington Avenue 106 Figure 5.6 Map of Additions to the Skyway
Recommended publications
  • 2018 NEA RA Minneapolis Information
    2018 NEA RA Minneapolis Information Minneapolis Hotel Hilton Minneapolis The Marquette Hotel Marriott City Center Convention Center Address 1001 Marquette Ave S 710 S Marquette Ave 30 S 7th St 1301 2nd Ave S Phone 612.376.1000 612.333.4545 612.349.4000 612.335.6000 Distance to: Hilton X 0.2 mi 0.4 mi 0.3 mi Marquette 0.2 mi X 0.2 mi 0.5 mi Marriott 0.4 mi 0.2 mi X 0.7 mi Convention Ctr 0.3 mi 0.5 mi 0.7 mi X Target 0.2 mi 0.2 mi 0.2 mi 0.5 mi CVS (inside target) 0.2 mi 0.2 mi 0.2 mi 0.5 mi Business Address Phone Hours M-F 7am-10pm, Sat 8am-10pm, Target 900 Nicollet Mall 612.338.0085 Sun 9-9 US Bank 80 S 8th St, Ste 224 612.337.7051 M-F 7:30am-5pm Wells Fargo 90 S 7th ST, 2nd floor 612.667.0654 M-F 9am-5pm CVS Pharmacy Inside Target 612.338.5215 M-F 7-7, Sat 9-6, Sun 10-6 Pharmacy Hours Store Hours M-F 7am-8pm, Sat Walgreens 655 Nicollet Mall 612.339.0363 M-F 7am-6pm, Sat 9am- 9-6, Sun 10-5 5pm M-F 5am-7pm, Sat 6am-7pm, Note: Earliest coffee shop Coffee & Bagels 1100 Nicollet Ave 612.338.0767 Sun 6-6 open St. Croix Cleaners 80 S 8th St (Inside IDS Center) 612.746.3935 M-F 7-1:30, 2-5:30 Useful apps for Nice Ride MN (city bike City Pages (event TripGo: City Transit iHail (taxi service) Minneapolis: service) calendar) Taxi ride into the city from the airport is at least $40.
    [Show full text]
  • 2012 ADC Executive Summary
    22001122 CCEDAR­­RRIVERSIDE CCOMMUNITY SSPACE SSTUDY FFINAL RREPORT Cedar‐Riverside Community Space Study – September 2012 ADC Executive Summary The Cedar Riverside neighborhood is home to over 7,000 residents and numerous organizations that need space for meeting, gathering, performing, educational, social service, and other types of activities. Often times, the demand for space is greater than the supply in this densely populated neighborhood. In order to determine the community spaces available and types of community spaces most needed in the neighborhood, the African Development Center (ADC) conducted a community space study, with financial support from the Cedar Riverside Neighborhood Revitalization Program. After extensive outreach and information gathering, the ADC found that the Cedar Riverside neighborhood is sometimes lacking in both knowledge of and access to currently available community spaces. In order to increase the level of awareness of available space in the Cedar Riverside neighborhood, ADC has created a Space Inventory document, which can be found here as an appendix, as well as on ADC’s website. The space inventory provides information regarding specific locations and rental terms of available space in Cedar Riverside. ADC expects that this inventory will help community members to better utilize space currently available in the neighborhood. Despite the fact that several neighborhood organizations are willing to open their doors for community use, there is still a major need for more spaces. Neighborhood representatives reported that the greatest desires are: community spaces for youth recreation and related services, fitness/exercise activities, adult/elder activities, large events/gatherings and social services. Despite many creative and cooperative approaches occurring to meet space needs among organizations large and small, there are still significant unmet needs.
    [Show full text]
  • Airport Survey Report Final
    Minneapolis - St. Paul Airport Special Generator Survey Metropolitan Council Travel Behavior Inventory Final report prepared for Metropolitan Council prepared by Cambridge Systematics, Inc. April 17, 2012 www.camsys.com report Minneapolis - St. Paul Airport Special Generator Survey Metropolitan Council Travel Behavior Inventory prepared for Metropolitan Council prepared by Cambridge Systematics, Inc. 115 South LaSalle Street, Suite 2200 Chicago, IL 60603 date April 17, 2012 Minneapolis - St. Paul Airport Special Generator Survey Table of Contents 1.0 Background ...................................................................................................... 1-1 2.0 Survey Implementation ................................................................................. 2-1 2.1 Sampling Plan ......................................................................................... 2-1 2.2 Survey Effort ........................................................................................... 2-2 2.3 Questionnaire Design ............................................................................. 2-2 2.4 Field Implementation ............................................................................. 2-3 3.0 Data Preparation for Survey Expansion ....................................................... 3-1 3.1 Existing Airline Databases ..................................................................... 3-1 3.2 Airport Survey Database - Airlines ....................................................... 3-2 3.3 Airport Survey Database
    [Show full text]
  • Final South Minneapolis Community Involvement Plan, English
    FINAL COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT PLAN SOUTH MINNEAPOLIS NEIGHBORHOOD SOIL CONTAMINATION SITE SOUTH MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA Prepared for U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region 5 Region 5 Office of Public Affairs 77 West Jackson Boulevard Chicago, Illinois 60604 TDD No. : S05-0404-010 Date Prepared : July 2005 Contract No. : 68-W-00-129 Prepared by : Tetra Tech EM Inc. START Project Manager : Cheryl Vaccarello Telephone No. : (312) 207-7791 U.S. EPA Work Assignment Manager : Cheryl Allen Telephone No. : (312) 353-6196 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK CONTENTS Section Page 1.0 INTRODUCTION ..............................................................................................................1 2.0 SITE BACKGROUND.......................................................................................................2 3.0 COMMUNITY BACKGROUND ......................................................................................3 3.1 COMMUNITY PROFILE....................................................................................3 3.2 HISTORY OF COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT...............................................5 3.3 COMMUNITY CONCERNS...............................................................................6 4.0 COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT PROGRAM OBJECTIVES........................................7 5.0 COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT ACTIVITIES ..............................................................8 Appendix A SCHEDULE OF COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT ACTIVITIES B U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY CONTACTS, ELECTED OFFICIALS, AND MEDIA
    [Show full text]
  • Passenger Rail System
    Minnesota Comprehensive Statewide Freight and Passenger Rail Plan Passenger Rail System draft technical memorandum 3 prepared for Minnesota Department of Transportation prepared by Cambridge Systematics, Inc. with Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. TKDA, Inc. July 17, 2009 www.camsys.com technical memorandum 3 Minnesota Comprehensive Statewide Freight and Passenger Rail Plan Passenger Rail System prepared for Minnesota Department of Transportation prepared by Cambridge Systematics, Inc. 100 CambridgePark Drive, Suite 400 Cambridge, Massachusetts 02140 July 17, 2009 Minnesota Comprehensive Statewide Freight and Passenger Rail Plan Passenger Rail System Technical Memorandum Table of Contents Executive Summary .............................................................................................................. ES-1 1.0 Objective ........................................................................................................................ 1-1 2.0 Methodology ................................................................................................................. 2-1 3.0 Overview of Findings .................................................................................................. 3-1 4.0 Operating and Capacity Conditions and Existing Ridership Forecasts for Potential Passenger Rail Corridors ........................................................................... 4-1 4.1 CP: Rochester-Winona......................................................................................... 4-1 4.2 CP: St. Paul-Red
    [Show full text]
  • METRO Green Line(Light Rail) BiE RacS So You Can Brin Your Bicycle Alon a Refillable Go-To Card Is the Most BUSES Northstar Ommuter Rail Line 1
    Effective 8/21/21 Reading a schedule: NORTHSTAR METRO Blue Line(Light Rail) Go-To Card Retail Locations How to Ride COMMUTER LINE All buses and trains have a step-by-step guide TO BIG LAKE METRO Green Line(Light Rail) bike racks so you can bring your bicycle along. A refillable Go-To Card is the most BUSES Northstar Commuter Rail Line 1. Find the schedule for convenient way to travel by transit! Look for instructions on the rack. Buy a Go-To Card or add value to an 35W 00 Connecting Routes & Metro Lines the day of the week 1. Arrive 5 minutes before the HWY Lockers are also available for rent. and the direction NORTHBOUND from existing card at one of these locations schedule or NexTrip says your 280 Timepoint 22 33 1 Details at metrotransit.org/bike. or online. Larpenteur Ave you plan to travel. trip will depart. 7 6 2. Look at the map and 2. Watch for your bus number. Target Field 3 MINNEAPOLIS 33 fi nd the timepoints LIGHT RAIL 1 2 2 • Metro Transit Service Center: 94 63 87 3. Pay your fare as you board, except Warehouse/Hennepin Ave nearest your trip 719 Marquette Ave for Pay Exit routes. 2 33 67 Nicollet Mall 84 35E start and end 5th St 67 • Unbank: 727 Hennepin Ave 3 30 63 Government Plaza 21 83 points. Your stop 4. Pull the cord above the window 62 4 U.S. Bank StadiumU of M Stadium Village about 1 block before your stop to DOWNTOWN East Bank 16 16 may be between ST PAUL MAJOR DESTINATIONS: 394 5 West Bank 8 67 21 3 MINNEAPOLIS 7 Prospect Park ne signal the driver.
    [Show full text]
  • 2015 Guideway Status Report
    This document is made available electronically by the Minnesota Legislative Reference Library as part of an ongoing digital archiving project. http://www.leg.state.mn.us/lrl/lrl.asp 2015 Legislative Report Guideway Status November 2015 PREPARED BY The Minnesota Department of Transportation 395 John Ireland Boulevard Saint Paul, Minnesota 55155-1899 Phone: 651-366-3000 Toll-Free: 1-800-657-3774 TTY, Voice or ASCII: 1-800-627-3529 In collaboration with the Metropolitan Council 390 Robert St. North St. Paul, MN 55101-1805 Phone: 651-602-1000 To request this document in an alternative format Please call 651-366-4718 or 1-800-657-3774 (Greater Minnesota). You may also send an email to [email protected]. Cover Photos: Northstar commuter rail train Source: Metro Council Green Line LRT Source: Streets MN Red Line BRT Source: Metro Council 2 Guideway Status Report November 2015 Contents Contents ......................................................................................................................................................... 3 Legislative Request........................................................................................................................................ 6 Statutory Requirement .................................................................................................................... 6 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................... 8 Statewide Planning ........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • U of M Minneapolis Area Neighborhood Impact Report
    Moving Forward Together: U of M Minneapolis Area Neighborhood Impact Report Appendices 1 2 Table of Contents Appendix 1: CEDAR RIVERSIDE: Neighborhood Profi le .....................5 Appendix 15: Maps: U of M Faculty and Staff Living in University Appendix 2: MARCY-HOLMES: Neighborhood Profi le .........................7 Neighborhoods .......................................................................27 Appendix 3: PROSPECT PARK: Neighborhood Profi le ..........................9 Appendix 16: Maps: U of M Twin Cities Campus Laborshed ....................28 Appendix 4: SOUTHEAST COMO: Neighborhood Profi le ...................11 Appendix 17: Maps: Residential Parcel Designation ...................................29 Appendix 5: UNIVERSITY DISTRICT: Neighborhood Profi le ......... 13 Appendix 18: Federal Facilities Impact Model ........................................... 30 Appendix 6: Map: U of M neighborhood business district ....................... 15 Appendix 19: Crime Data .............................................................................. 31 Appendix 7: Commercial District Profi le: Stadium Village .....................16 Appendix 20: Examples and Best Practices ..................................................32 Appendix 8: Commercial District Profi le: Dinkytown .............................18 Appendix 21: Examples of Prior Planning and Development Appendix 9: Commercial District Profi le: Cedar Riverside .................... 20 Collaboratives in the District ................................................38 Appendix 10: Residential
    [Show full text]
  • Improvin G Water Quality in the Minneapolis Chain of Lakes and Minnehaha Creek: Stakeholders and Potential Strategies
    NPCR 1053 Improvin_g Water Quality in the Minneapolis Chain of Lakes and Minnehaha Creek: Stakeholders and Potential Strategies A CONSORTIUM PROJECT OF: Augsburg College; College of St. Catherine; Hamline University; Higher Education Consortium for Urban Affairs; Macalester College; Metropolitan State University; Minneapolis Community College; Minneapolis Neighborhood Revitalization Program; University of Minnesota (Center for Urban and Regional Affairs; Children, Youth and Family Consortium; Minnesota Extension Service); University of St. Thomas; and Minneapolis community and neighborhood representatives. CURA RESOURCE COLLECTION Center for Urban and Regional Affairs University of Minnesota 330 Humphrey Center Improving Water Quality in the Minneapolis Chain of Lakes and Minnehaha Creek: Stakeholders and Potential Strategies Report prepared for the Lynnhurst Neighborhood Natural Environment Committee Andrzej Kozlowski Center for Urban and Regional Affairs, University of Minnesota February, 1997 -==:. February, 1997 Neighborhood Planning for Community Revitalization (NPCR) supported the work of the author of this report but has not reviewed it for publication. The content is solely the responsibility of the author and is not necessarily endorsed by NPCR. NPCR is coordinated by the Center for Urban and Regional Affairs at the University of Minnesota and is funded in part by an Urban Community Service Program grant administered by the U.S. Department of Education. NPCR 330 lilI Center 301 19th Avenue South Minneapolis, MN 55455 phone: 612/625-1020 e-mail: [email protected] TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Introduction ................................................................................3 II. The major stakeholders ...................................................................3 III. Preliminary list of potential strategies for improving water quality ................ 16 IV. Summary: discussion of partnerships and areas of future exploration ..............20 V.
    [Show full text]
  • Alternatives Analysis Summary Report
    Alternatives Analysis Summary Report Hennepin County Regional Railroad Authority Minnesota May 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 1 ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS 5 Alternatives Analysis Study 5 D2 Investigation 10 LPA Selection 13 NEXT STEPS 24 APPENDICES 24 BottineauTransitway Alternatives Analysis Summary Report INTRODUCTION WHAT IS THE PURPOSE OF THIS REPORT? FIGURE 1: TWIN CITIES REGIONAL TRANSITWAY SYSTEM This report summarizes the Alternatives Analysis (AA) evaluation process and recommendations for the Bot- Northstar Line continued tineau Transitway The report describes which transit Northstar Line modes, facilities, and alignments were studied and 94 why decisions were made to discontinue study of some alternatives and recommend further study of others It also describes the major steps in the decision process 94 35W 35E and who was involved 694 94 94 694 This report describes the steps leading to 694 the selection of a Locally Preferred Alter- 35W Proposed Bottineau 35E native (LPA) for the Bottineau Transitway. Minneapolis Transitway 694 The LPA is the transitway alternative that 394 Green Line St. Paul 94 the corridor’s cities, Hennepin County, 494 Blue Line (Central) and the Metropolitan Council recommend (Hiawatha) Green Line 494 for construction. (Southwest) The LPA responds to the five needs that prompted study of the Bottineau Transit- 494 way: growing travel demand, increasing traffic congestion, people who depend on 35W 35E 77 transit, limited transit service and reverse Line Orange (I-35W) commute opportunities, and regional
    [Show full text]
  • South High Students Walk out to Support All Nations Program
    Old-fashioned One sort Roosevelt and market proposed recycling gives Wellstone: Two for Lake Street Mpls. a boost schools in one Page 2 Page 3 Page 7 Longfellow Nokomis Your community Messeng newspaper since 1982 April 2013 • Vol. 29 No. 2 www.LongfellowNokomisMessenger.com 21,000 Circulation assembly held prior to the walk- keys. However, after local Native Minneapolis Youth out. American activists insisted students Movement formed by “All recognized the need for had the right to get their things, South High students diversity and gave a powerful mes- administrators agreed to allow stu- students to bring about sage about learning and recogniz- dents back in one at a time with ing each other.” Bellanger. “I was supervision, according to W. changes in their school really impressed with them.” Vizenor. district walk out to support “If this is an example of the Students were also warned be- young people coming up, I’m very fore they left the building that their By TESHA M. CHRISTENSEN happy.” departure would constitute an un- What began as a protest by All Nations program excused absence and that they Native American students grew FROM ASSEMBLY would not be allowed back with- into a walkout that united all eth- out a parent. They were welcome nic groups at South High School TO WALK-OUT back the next day. on Monday, March 11. W. Vizenor had initially planned to Organizers estimate that 500- organize a walkout, but then WHAT’S NEXT? 1,000 students peacefully walked agreed to work with school staff to Following the walkout, 50 students out of the school in a show of soli- hold an assembly inside instead.
    [Show full text]
  • Performance Evaluation Report Report to the Minnesota Legislature
    This document is made available electronically by the Minnesota Legislative Reference Library as part of an ongoing digital archiving project. http://www.leg.state.mn.us/lrl/lrl.asp 2019 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT REPORT TO THE MINNESOTA LEGISLATURE November 2020 The Council’s mission is to foster efficient and economic growth for a prosperous metropolitan region Metropolitan Council Members Charlie Zelle, Chair Raymond Zeran, District 9 Judy Johnson, District 1 Peter Lindstrom, District 10 Reva Chamblis, District 2 Susan Vento, District 11 Christopher Ferguson, District 3 Francisco J. Gonzalez, District 12 Deb Barber, District 4 Chai Lee, District 13 Molly Cummings, District 5 Kris Fredson, District 14 Lynnea Atlas-Ingebretson, District 6 Phillip Sterner, District 15 Robert Lilligren. District 7 Wendy Wulff, District 16 Abdirahman Muse, District 8 The Metropolitan Council is the regional planning organization for the seven-county Twin Cities area. The Council operates the regional bus and rail system, collects and treats wastewater, coordinates regional water resources, plans and helps fund regional parks, and administers federal funds that provide housing opportunities for low- and moderate- income individuals and families. The 17-member Council board is appointed by and serves at the pleasure of the governor. On request, this publication will be made available in alternative formats to people with disabilities. Call Metropolitan Council information at 651- 602-1140 or TTY 651-291-0904. Metropolitan Council 2019 Performance Evaluation Report About This Report The Metropolitan Council recognizes performance evaluation as a key tool to ensure that its functions meet their objectives in a timely and cost-effective manner.
    [Show full text]