DOCSLIB.ORG

2012 ADC Executive Summary

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2012 ADC Executive Summary 22001122 CCEDAR­­RRIVERSIDE CCOMMUNITY SSPACE SSTUDY FFINAL RREPORT Cedar‐Riverside Community Space Study – September 2012 ADC Executive Summary The Cedar Riverside neighborhood is home to over 7,000 residents and numerous organizations that need space for meeting, gathering, performing, educational, social service, and other types of activities. Often times, the demand for space is greater than the supply in this densely populated neighborhood. In order to determine the community spaces available and types of community spaces most needed in the neighborhood, the African Development Center (ADC) conducted a community space study, with financial support from the Cedar Riverside Neighborhood Revitalization Program. After extensive outreach and information gathering, the ADC found that the Cedar Riverside neighborhood is sometimes lacking in both knowledge of and access to currently available community spaces. In order to increase the level of awareness of available space in the Cedar Riverside neighborhood, ADC has created a Space Inventory document, which can be found here as an appendix, as well as on ADC’s website. The space inventory provides information regarding specific locations and rental terms of available space in Cedar Riverside. ADC expects that this inventory will help community members to better utilize space currently available in the neighborhood. Despite the fact that several neighborhood organizations are willing to open their doors for community use, there is still a major need for more spaces. Neighborhood representatives reported that the greatest desires are: community spaces for youth recreation and related services, fitness/exercise activities, adult/elder activities, large events/gatherings and social services. Despite many creative and cooperative approaches occurring to meet space needs among organizations large and small, there are still significant unmet needs. Based on the study findings, ADC makes the following recommendations aimed at providing the neighborhood with adequate community space: 1) The many organizations interested in the issue of community space need to “get on the same page” to cooperatively define the problem and commit to finding a solution. 2) The neighborhood needs to unite behind the improvement of spaces like the Coyle Center and Curry Park. 3) Major neighborhood institutions have to be encouraged to play an even larger role in meeting space needs. Cedar‐Riverside Community Space Study – September 2012 ADC 4) Developers of key neighborhood sites have to make efforts to accommodate community space needs. 5) More partnerships need to be developed that match space/programming needs with organizations that already have facilities and program staff. 6) The Space Inventory document needs to be continuously updated and maintained. 7) An individual and/or organization should be designated as the lead to take action on the above recommendations. ADC believes that following through on these actions can significantly alleviate space needs in the community. In the following sections of this report, ADC discusses the outreach, information gathering, and data maintenance conducted for this study. It also reports study statistics and results. Finally, it concludes with key recommendations based on study findings. Cedar‐Riverside Community Space Study – September 2012 ADC Table of Contents Methodology ........................................................................................................... 1 Outreach and Information Gathering .................................................................. 1 Data Maintenance ................................................................................................... 1 Results ..................................................................................................................... 3 Quantitative Results ............................................................................................. 3 Qualitative Results ............................................................................................... 4 ADC Response....................................................................................................... 8 Recommendations .................................................................................................. 9 Appendices ............................................................................................................ 11 Cedar‐Riverside Community Space Study – September 2012 ADC Methodology Outreach and Information Gathering ADC spent a significant amount of time meeting with neighborhood stakeholders to better understand their concerns and perspectives and also determine what spaces may be available for community use. ADC spent nearly two hundred hours contacting and meeting with individuals representing 30 organizations in the Cedar Riverside neighborhood. To jumpstart the space study, ADC staff brainstormed a list of approximately twenty people and organizations involved in the Cedar Riverside neighborhood. ADC then e‐mailed and called this list of contacts to schedule appointments. Next, project leaders created a basic questionnaire to guide the interviews conducted with stakeholders. ADC staff made an effort to meet at the interviewees’ place of work rather than at ADC, as they deemed it important to see firsthand the environment and space in which the organizations operate. To begin the interviews, ADC introduced its organization and the space study and then asked the interviewee to provide some background information on their role in the neighborhood. Next, ADC asked for three main pieces of information: what space the Cedar Riverside neighborhood needs; what spaces are currently available that the community uses; and what space (if any) the organization has that can be used by the community. Interview length varied greatly, lasting between twenty and ninety minutes. At the conclusion of each interview, ADC staff asked interviewees which organizations or people they suggest ADC also interview. This tactic proved extremely helpful. By using the network of community members, the contact list nearly tripled from twenty to fifty five people. During an eight week period, ADC interviewed 30 stakeholders. Interviewees represented a variety of interests including community groups, cultural/entertainment organizations, social service providers, educational and medical institutions, religious groups, developers and multi‐ unit housing owners/managers. Data Maintenance Throughout the study, ADC maintained several working documents in order to organize and record the process, responses, and results of the project. Such documentation has also helped to draw evidence‐based conclusions and recommendations. Below is a list and short description of key documents created during the study. Some of these documents are found in the appendices to this report. 1 Cedar‐Riverside Community Space Study – September 2012 ADC Contacts List A spreadsheet was developed with the contact information of stakeholders and organizations in the neighborhood. ADC interviewed thirty of the contacts. The document was also used to keep track of the status of the contact, whether they had been reached, met with, and whether their responses had been digitally recorded. A shortened version of this working document is attached as Appendix 1. Questionnaire This document was taken to each interview and completed in handwritten form by ADC staff. It is a one page document that prompts interviewers to fill in the key contact information of interviewees and then provides space for interviewers to fill in responses to the four principle questions: space needed in the neighborhood, space used in the neighborhood, space the organization may have available, and other people or organizations that should be contacted regarding the study. The Questionnaire form is attached as Appendix 2. Questionnaire Responses These documents are digital versions of the notes taken from the Questionnaires by ADC staff during the interviews. The responses contain information used to calculate space needs statistics. They also contain a significant amount of qualitative information and feedback from interviewees that is not reflected in the simple space needs statistics. Space Needs Statistics This spreadsheet records the responses to the first topic on the Questionnaire: space needed in the Cedar Riverside neighborhood. Interviewees did not have a limit to the number of needs they could list. The spreadsheet indicates the number of times a specific space need was mentioned among all interviewees and groups the space needs into broader categories. This document is attached as Appendix 3. Space Inventory The space inventory is the basis for the document posted on the ADC website. It lists individual organizations in the neighborhood, the details of their rental spaces and rental terms, and contact information in case someone is interested in renting the space. This document is attached as Appendix 4. 2 Cedar‐Riverside Community Space Study – September 2012 ADC Results Quantitative Results Statistics were calculated regarding community space needed in the Cedar Riverside neighborhood. As a result of responses compiled during the 30 interviews, 13 broad categories of space needs were identified. The percentage of responses by category were: Children's Play Cultural Venues Area/Tot Lot 3% Library/Computer 3% Lab 3% Multi‐Purpose Parking 4% 4% Youth Recreation/Related Activities 24% Business Services 6% Green Space/Outdoor Activities 6% Fitness/Exercise
Load more

Recommended publications
  • US Bank Branch Location Detail by Branch State AR
    US Bank Branch Location Detail by Branch State AR AA CENTRAL_ARKANSAS STATE CNTY MSA TRACT % Med LOCATION Branch ADDRESS CITY ZIP CODE CODE CODE Income Type 05 019 99999 9538.00 108.047 Arkadelphia Main Street F 526 Main St Arkadelphia 71923 05 059 99999 0207.00 106.6889 Bismarck AR F 6677 Highway 7 Bismarck 71929 05 059 99999 0204.00 74.9001 Malvern Ash Street F 327 S Ash St Malvern 72104 05 019 99999 9536.01 102.2259 West Pine F 2701 Pine St Arkadelphia 71923 AA FORT_SMITH_AR STATE CNTY MSA TRACT % Med LOCATION Branch ADDRESS CITY ZIP CODE CODE CODE Income Type 05 033 22900 0206.00 110.8144 Alma F 115 Hwy 64 W Alma 72921 05 033 22900 0203.02 116.7655 Pointer Trail F 102 Pointer Trl W Van Buren 72956 05 033 22900 0205.02 61.1586 Van Buren 6th & Webster F 510 Webster St Van Buren 72956 AA HEBER_SPRINGS STATE CNTY MSA TRACT % Med LOCATION Branch ADDRESS CITY ZIP CODE CODE CODE Income Type 05 023 99999 4804.00 114.3719 Heber Springs F 821 W Main St Heber Springs 72543 05 023 99999 4805.02 118.3 Quitman F 6149 Heber Springs Rd W Quitman 721319095 AA HOT_SPRINGS_AR STATE CNTY MSA TRACT % Med LOCATION Branch ADDRESS CITY ZIP CODE CODE CODE Income Type 05 051 26300 0120.02 112.1492 Highway 7 North F 101 Cooper Cir Hot Springs Village 71909 05 051 26300 0112.00 124.5881 Highway 70 West F 1768 Airport Rd Hot Springs 71913 05 051 26300 0114.00 45.0681 Hot Springs Central Avenue F 1234 Central Ave Hot Springs 71901 05 051 26300 0117.00 108.4234 Hot Springs Mall F 4451 Central Ave Hot Springs 71913 05 051 26300 0116.01 156.8431 Malvern Avenue F
    [Show full text]
  • Child Care Providers (Updated 7/2011)
    Child Care Providers (Updated 7/2011) There are several websites available to help you narrow your child care provider search in addition to providing you with other resource information, including average weekly child care rates and child care tax credit information. These websites also have links to other resources. Please note that some websites may require you to create a login and password in order to access the information. Minnesota Child Care Resource and Referral Network (www.mnchildcare.org) Resources for Child Caring (www.resourcesforchildcaring.org) Child Care Financial Aid (www.childcarefinancialaid.org) Daycare in Minneapolis (www.moredaycare.com) Calhoun Isle Community Bryn-Mawr, CARAG, Cedar-Isles-Dean, East Isles, ECCO, Kenwood, Lowry Hill, Lowry Hill East, West Calhoun Appletree Child Care Lois Jaeger Day Care Grace Neighborhood Amy’s Day Care 300 Cedar Lake Road South 2006 West 21st Street Nursery 3220 Colfax Avenue South Minneapolis, MN 55405 Minneapolis, MN 55405 1430 West 27th Street #M Minneapolis, MN 55408 (612) 374-1430 (612) 374-5376 Minneapolis, MN 55408 (612) 824-9726 (612) 872-8131 Camden Community Camden-Industrial Area, Cleveland, Folwell, Humboldt Industrial Area, Lind-Bohanon, McKinley, Shingle Creek, Victory, Webber-Camden Kids Time Child Care New Horizons All My Children Day Care Rise and Shine Early Center 4656 Colfax Avenue North 1905 44th Avenue North Learning Center 4350 Fremont Avenue North Minneapolis, MN 55412 Minneapolis, MN 55412 3457 Fremont Avenue North Minneapolis, MN 55412 (612) 521-0139
    [Show full text]
  • Seward Redesign: 50 Years of Transformation
    Seward Redesign Fiy Years of Transformation anks to the great sta at Seward Redesign for support, especially Brigid Higgins and Shaina Brassard. anks to all the former Seward Redesign folks who made time to assist with this project and provide information, sup- port, and materials, especially David Fey, Gary Hesser, Caren Dewar. Cara Letofsky, Bob Mack, Brian Miller, Renee Spillum, Bob Roscoe and Sheldon Mains. anks nally to the Minnesota Historical Society for supporting this work. Published in Saint Paul in 2020 for Seward Redesign. Copyright © William Lindeke 2020 All rights reserved William Lindeke 956 Charles Avenue Saint Paul, Minnesota 55104 This publication was made possible in part by the people of Minnesota through a grant funded by an appropriation to the Minnesota Historical Society from the Minnesota Arts and Cultural Heritage Fund. Any views, findings, opinions, conclusions or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of the State of Minnesota, the Minnesota Historical Society, or the Minnesota Historic Resources Advisory Committee. Seward Redesign in Context Fiy years is a long time in an American city. e history of Seward Redesign begins with the institutions and conversations the proceeded it, and the ever-changing organization reects the political and social fabric of Minneapolis over a turbulent and transformational time for American cities. Over the decades in which it has worked in South Minneapolis, Seward Redesign evolved from its roots as part of a community reaction to destructive freeway and urban renewal projects, beginning by developing small-scale housing rehabilitation and construction projects.
    [Show full text]
  • Neighborhood Directory
    Neighborhoods Neighborhood Group Covered Staff Contact Chairperson Meeting Schedule 1) Armatage Neighborhood Association Armatage Lauren Anderson Joel Federer Board: 3rd Tuesday 2500 West 57th Street 466-0296 866-3397 Green Team: 2nd Thursday Minneapolis, MN 55410 Community Engagement: 1st Thursday e-mail: ANACoordinator@armatage.org joelfed@gmail.com Safety, Equity and Outreach: 1st Saturday Annual Meeting: 3rd Tuesday of May 2) Audubon Neighborhood Association Audubon Park Deborah Brister Evan Benson Board: 1st Monday 2600 Johnson Street NE, Suite A 788-8790 978-4551 Community: 1st Monday (even months) Minneapolis, MN 55418 743-5943 29th Avenue Task Force: 2nd Tuesday e-mail: mail@audubonneighborhood.org deborah@audubonneighborhood.org loldetailing1@gmail.com Festival: 3rd Monday 3) Bancroft Neighborhood Association Bancroft Luke Stulz Nolan Morice Board: 1st Thursday 4120 17th Avenue South 724-5313 Outreach: 3rd Monday Minneapolis, MN 55407 e-mail: info@bancroftneighborhood.org 4) Beltrami Neighborhood Council Beltrami Mike Ferrin James Granse Board: 1st Monday PO Box 18297 229-8480 651-272-6642 Housing and Livability: 4th Monday Minneapolis, MN 55418-0297 568-6722 Events: 2nd Monday e-mail: office@discoverbeltrami.org mike@discoverbeltrami.org jamesgranse@gmail.com Annual Meeting: 2nd Monday of September 5) Bottineau Neighborhood Association Bottineau Reanne Reed Viken Mariam Slayhi Board: 2nd Tuesday 2205 California Street NE, #107 367-7262 280-7652 Minneapolis, MN 55418 e-mail: BNA@bottineauneighborhood.org mslayhi@gmail.com 6)
    [Show full text]
  • U of M Minneapolis Area Neighborhood Impact Report
    Moving Forward Together: U of M Minneapolis Area Neighborhood Impact Report Appendices 1 2 Table of Contents Appendix 1: CEDAR RIVERSIDE: Neighborhood Profi le .....................5 Appendix 15: Maps: U of M Faculty and Staff Living in University Appendix 2: MARCY-HOLMES: Neighborhood Profi le .........................7 Neighborhoods .......................................................................27 Appendix 3: PROSPECT PARK: Neighborhood Profi le ..........................9 Appendix 16: Maps: U of M Twin Cities Campus Laborshed ....................28 Appendix 4: SOUTHEAST COMO: Neighborhood Profi le ...................11 Appendix 17: Maps: Residential Parcel Designation ...................................29 Appendix 5: UNIVERSITY DISTRICT: Neighborhood Profi le ......... 13 Appendix 18: Federal Facilities Impact Model ........................................... 30 Appendix 6: Map: U of M neighborhood business district ....................... 15 Appendix 19: Crime Data .............................................................................. 31 Appendix 7: Commercial District Profi le: Stadium Village .....................16 Appendix 20: Examples and Best Practices ..................................................32 Appendix 8: Commercial District Profi le: Dinkytown .............................18 Appendix 21: Examples of Prior Planning and Development Appendix 9: Commercial District Profi le: Cedar Riverside .................... 20 Collaboratives in the District ................................................38 Appendix 10: Residential
    [Show full text]
  • Improvin G Water Quality in the Minneapolis Chain of Lakes and Minnehaha Creek: Stakeholders and Potential Strategies
    NPCR 1053 Improvin_g Water Quality in the Minneapolis Chain of Lakes and Minnehaha Creek: Stakeholders and Potential Strategies A CONSORTIUM PROJECT OF: Augsburg College; College of St. Catherine; Hamline University; Higher Education Consortium for Urban Affairs; Macalester College; Metropolitan State University; Minneapolis Community College; Minneapolis Neighborhood Revitalization Program; University of Minnesota (Center for Urban and Regional Affairs; Children, Youth and Family Consortium; Minnesota Extension Service); University of St. Thomas; and Minneapolis community and neighborhood representatives. CURA RESOURCE COLLECTION Center for Urban and Regional Affairs University of Minnesota 330 Humphrey Center Improving Water Quality in the Minneapolis Chain of Lakes and Minnehaha Creek: Stakeholders and Potential Strategies Report prepared for the Lynnhurst Neighborhood Natural Environment Committee Andrzej Kozlowski Center for Urban and Regional Affairs, University of Minnesota February, 1997 -==:. February, 1997 Neighborhood Planning for Community Revitalization (NPCR) supported the work of the author of this report but has not reviewed it for publication. The content is solely the responsibility of the author and is not necessarily endorsed by NPCR. NPCR is coordinated by the Center for Urban and Regional Affairs at the University of Minnesota and is funded in part by an Urban Community Service Program grant administered by the U.S. Department of Education. NPCR 330 lilI Center 301 19th Avenue South Minneapolis, MN 55455 phone: 612/625-1020 e-mail: npcr@freenet.msp.mn.us TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Introduction ................................................................................3 II. The major stakeholders ...................................................................3 III. Preliminary list of potential strategies for improving water quality ................ 16 IV. Summary: discussion of partnerships and areas of future exploration ..............20 V.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report } 2006
    } Annual Report } 2006 Greater Metropolitan Housing Corporation Our Offices: Main Office: Greater Metropolitan Housing Corporation Our 15 South Fifth Street, suite 710 Minneapolis MN 55402 Phone: 612-339-0601 Fax: 612-339-0608 www.gmhchousing.org Mission: to preserve, improve 909Northeast Main Street Northeast Minneapolis MN 55413 and increase Phone: 612-378-7985 Fax: 612-378-7986 www.housingresourcecenter.org affordable housing 2140Northwest 44th Avenue North for low and moderate Minneapolis MN 55412 Phone: 612-588-3033 Fax: 612-588-3028 income individuals www.housingresourcecenter.org and families, as well 3749Southside Cedar Avenue South Minneapolis MN 55407 Phone: 612-722-7141 as assist communities Fax: 612-722-6367 www.housingresourcecenter.org with housing 1170NorthMetro Lepak Court Shoreview MN 55126 revitalization. Phone: 651-486-7401 Fax: 651-486-7424 www.housingresourcecenter.org 627Saint Selby AvenuePaul Saint Paul MN 55104 Phone: 651-228-1077 Fax: 651-228-1083 www.housingresourcecenter.org Cover Photos: Top photo- Groundbreaking of Central Community Housing Trust’s ‘Clover Field Marketplace’ will provide 115 apartments and 9,000 sq. ft. of commercial space in Chaska, MN. GMHC provided $350,000 in predevelopment loans for this project. Center Photo- GMHC-built single family homes. Bottom Photo-Community Housing Development Corporation’s ‘Haralson Apartments’ in Apple Valley, MN provides 40 single-room occupancy units for single adults with incomes in the $15,000 and below range. GMHC provided $190,000 in predevelopment loans for this project. Few people in Minneapolis In Loving Memory of Our could point in Founder and Friend nearly every direction and CharlesDecember R. 18, Krusell 2006 say they had a President, Greater Metropolitan Housing Corporation, 1970-1991 Chuck pioneered the employment of African American residents in Minneapolis hand in the city government and development the city’s first Affirmative Action program.
    [Show full text]
  • CEDAR-ISLES-DEAN NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION Annual Members Meeting Minutes, May 12, 7-8:30 P.M
    CEDAR-ISLES-DEAN NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION Annual Members Meeting Minutes, May 12, 7-8:30 p.m. Online via Zoom Minutes by Rosanne Halloran Board members present: Chair Mary Pattock, Vice Chair Tim Sheridan, Secretary Rosanne Halloran, Dean Kephart, Claire Ruebeck, Amanda Vallone and CIDNA Coordinator Michael Jon Olson. Absent: Evan Carlson, Stephen Goltry, Treasurer Kevin Johnson Invited guests: Lisa Goodman / Minneapolis City Council Member - Ward 7, Marion Greene / Hennepin County Commissioner - District 3, and CIDNA accountant Robert Thompson. About 25 community members were also present. Call to order: Mary Pattock, Chair • Mary called the meeting to order at 7:04 p.m. The board approved the meeting agenda and the April 14, 2021 meeting minutes. Mary welcomed attendees and invited them to consider running for board membership later in the meeting. • She welcomed CIDNA’s new coordinator, Michael Jon Olson, who comes to CIDNA with extensive neighborhood organization experience and management skills. He reviewed the Zoom meeting protocols with attendees. Financial Report / Robert Thompson, CIDNA Accountant Robert said CIDNA is financially healthy. In addition to ongoing City funding, we have access to $18,000 previously contracted but unspent, which must be spent by the end of December. Our loan to Propel for affordable housing was paid back; those $134K Minneapolis Neighborhood Revitalization Program (NRP) dollars can be used again for housing or other projects allowable under NRP legislation. Annual Report / Mary Pattock, Chair • CIDNA made substantial progress in community engagement this year, due in part to Communication Committee activities, including the “Take a Look at CIDNA” Facebook project, and the neighborhood survey, which has nearly 200 responses so far.
    [Show full text]
  • Envisioning a Crossroads Library
    Envisioning a Crossroads Library: A Report on Public Engagement and the Future of the Southeast Library Como Neighborhood Marcy-Holmes Neighborhood Current Southeast Library Downtown Prospect Park Neighborhood Minneapolis University Neighborhood Cedar Riverside Neighborhood Presented to Hennepin County Library Prepared by Steve Kelley, Project Director kelle644@umn.edu 21 January 2015 Acknowledgements Project Collaborators Meredith Brandon – Graduate research assistant and report author Steve Kelley – Senior Fellow, project director Bryan Lopez – Graduate research assistant and report author Dr. Jerry Stein – Project advisor Ange Wang – Design methods consultant Sandra Wolfe-Wood – Design methods consultant Community Contributors Najat Ajaram - Teacher at Minneapple International Montessori School Sandy Brick - Local artist and SE Library art curator Sara Dotty - Literary Specialist at Marcy Open School Rev. Douglas Donley - University Baptist Church Pastor Cassie Hartnett – Coordinator of Trinity Lutheran Homework Help Eric Heideman – Librarian at Southeast Library Paul Jaeger – Recreation Supervisor at Van Cleve Recreation Center David Lenander – Head of the Rivendell Group Gail Linnerson – Librarian with Hennepin County Libraries Wendy Lougee - Director of UMN Libraries Jason McLean – Owner and manager of Loring Pasta Bar and Varsity Theater Marji Miller - Executive Director SE Seniors Mike Mulrooney – Owner of Blarney’s Pub in Dinkytown Huy Nguyen - Luxton Recreation Center Director James Ruiz – Support staff member at Southeast Library
    [Show full text]
  • February 16, 2021 Regular Agenda Packet
    Economic Development Authority City Hall Council Chambers Via telephone or other electronic means 5200 – 85th Avenue North Tuesday, February 16, 2021 7:00 pm REGULAR MEETING – AGENDA #3 President Lisa Jacobson, Vice President Terry Parks, Treasurer Susan Pha, Commissioners Boyd Morson, Wynfred Russell and Tonja West-Hafner. Executive Director Kim Berggren, Assistant Executive Director Jay Stroebel and Secretary Theresa Freund Some members of the Commission will participate in the meeting by electronic means pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 13D.021 rather than in-person at its regular meeting place at City Hall, 5200 85th Avenue North, Brooklyn Park, Minnesota. Members of the public can monitor the meeting by watching it on CCX Media Channel 16 or by livestreaming it at https://nwsccc-brooklynpark.granicus.com/ViewPublisher.php?view_id=5 Anyone who wants to address the EDA during the Public Comment period or on any Agenda Item may do so by calling 763-493-8059 or emailing theresa.freund@brooklynpark.org by 4:30 pm on February 16. You will be asked to provide your name, address, email and phone number. You will then be registered to speak during the meeting and will be provided a call-in number to address the EDA. Members of the public who desire to give input or testimony during the meeting may do so by texting Executive Director Kim Berggren at 612-760-0514 or emailing her at kimberly.berggren@brooklynpark.org (Subject line: "EDA Testimony"). For reasonable accommodations or alternative formats, contact Theresa Freund, 763-493-8059 or email theresa.freund@brooklynpark.org. Para asistencia, 763-493-8059.
    [Show full text]
  • 03 Prospect Park
    NPS Form 10-900-a (Rev. 8/2002) OMB No. 1024-0018 (Expires 5-31-2012) United States Department of the Interior Prospect Park ResidentialPut Here Historic District National Park Service Name of Property Hennepin County, MN County and State National Register of Historic Places N/A Continuation Sheet Name of multiple listing (if applicable) Section number 8 Page 1 NARRATIVE STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE The civil engineers who laid out the Prospect Park plats, Samuel Harlan Baker and Joseph H. Gilmore, were influenced by the work of their contemporary, Horace William Shaler (H. W. S.) Cleveland, and the picturesque landscape designs that are a hallmark of the era. Upon the framework of these plats, the residents shaped Prospect Park’s character and appearance. The neighborhood is significant as the home of the first community association in the city of Minneapolis, the Prospect Park Improvement Association (PPIA). The PPIA quickly established itself as a major influence, effecting changes ranging from the removal of weeds to the construction of the neighborhood’s iconic water tower. The community’s culture was enriched by its proximity to the University of Minnesota, which drew many academics to Prospect Park. The Prospect Park Historic District is one of three suburban-type developments that were established in Minneapolis in the late nineteenth century. While the architectural design in the other two, Kenwood and Washburn Park, is relatively homogeneous, following the pattern of many of the city’s neighborhoods, the houses in Prospect Park display a spectrum of the residential styles that appeared in Minneapolis during the late nineteenth century and the twentieth century.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Comment Phillips South Powderhorn and 35Th St E Street
    Date: February 2,2021 Property ID: 02-028-24-12-0110 Address: 3027 14th avenue south, Minneapolis, MN 55407 Owner name & Taxpayer of above address: Brenda Short Dear Mayor Frey, Transportation and Public Works committee, and Minneapolis City Council: I am writing to you to object to the above resurfacing project. By allowing this project during a time of morning of four men and one 18-year-old woman who lost their live on these same streets you are trying to cover. As a Mother of four children, I am very disappointed on how the city of Minneapolis, has handled a lot of issues in the Year 2020. This being said ,I do not believe that this is not the correct time morally or financially for this work to be done. Many homeowners like myself had to take fewer hours at work or was asked to take furloughs, or just lost their job. On top of the financial stress due to cov-19. Homeowners is still dealing with the emotional stress that the city of Minneapolis and city council has forced upon them. Shortly after the George Floyd riot many homeowners like myself found out about families in need at our local parks. Is stead of getting help for these people from the city or mayor or Hennepin county. Homeowners and volunteers were force into unpaid roles as, social workers, and financial assistant workers. we tried to help the people unfortunate during a time of need. The city and law enforcement abused them and destroyed the little property and dignity these people have.
    [Show full text]