DOCSLIB.ORG

Public Comment Phillips South Powderhorn and 35Th St E Street

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Public Comment Phillips South Powderhorn and 35Th St E Street Date: February 2,2021 Property ID: 02-028-24-12-0110 Address: 3027 14th avenue south, Minneapolis, MN 55407 Owner name & Taxpayer of above address: Brenda Short Dear Mayor Frey, Transportation and Public Works committee, and Minneapolis City Council: I am writing to you to object to the above resurfacing project. By allowing this project during a time of morning of four men and one 18-year-old woman who lost their live on these same streets you are trying to cover. As a Mother of four children, I am very disappointed on how the city of Minneapolis, has handled a lot of issues in the Year 2020. This being said ,I do not believe that this is not the correct time morally or financially for this work to be done. Many homeowners like myself had to take fewer hours at work or was asked to take furloughs, or just lost their job. On top of the financial stress due to cov-19. Homeowners is still dealing with the emotional stress that the city of Minneapolis and city council has forced upon them. Shortly after the George Floyd riot many homeowners like myself found out about families in need at our local parks. Is stead of getting help for these people from the city or mayor or Hennepin county. Homeowners and volunteers were force into unpaid roles as, social workers, and financial assistant workers. we tried to help the people unfortunate during a time of need. The city and law enforcement abused them and destroyed the little property and dignity these people have. A few weeks after the city clear out the local parks, I was thinking we could have a little peace and quiet. But the city approved contracts for a non-necessity gas meter replacement to be completed on the same 17 streets you list in this resurfacing project. This gas project lasted three and a half months began 8/1/2020 to the 2nd week in November of 2020. For the first 4 weeks of this project. The gas company dig 6 feet wide holes in our streets and rip up our sidewalks, and our yards, and destroy our property. This gas meter project cause almost $60,000 worth of damage to my home, on top of this damage to my home. This project left 2 six feet wide holes opened in front of my home for days at a time, causing rainwater to run under my home and making my foundation move. And because these two 6 feet wide holes left open for days at a time made it unsafe, for my 75-year-old mother who is disable and in a wheelchair. Because she could not have access to the handicapped ramp in front of our home, she was denied medical treatment, and could not go to her planned infusion treatments appointments. Missing these appointments cause us to be forced to find another Doctor, because if you miss 3 appointment with the doctor. The doctor can refuse to take you as a patient. The gas company did not give proper notice to the property owners, we just received a random knock at our front doors telling us they needed to get in our home. None of the workers were wearing masked while in my neighbor’s homes. When we complained to the city or the gas company about the way we were treated in our own homes. They did nothing but took down a complaint that went nowhere. I refused the gas company to come in my home during this time. This was because of cov-19 and because my mother has an infectious disease. the gas company refused my mother to have access to use her handicap ramp. there were a 6 feet wide hole at the bottom of it. The gas company called the police department on me requesting for the Minneapolis police officer to remove me and my mother out our home with out a warrant. Making me more unhappy with the Minneapolis police department on how they handle black people in the community. I was informed on February 1,2021 that the gas company is coming back to try to finish the gas meter project, because one of the main gas lines runs under my home, they will be reopening the same two holes in front of my house for three to four months in the spring of 2021. Your project will be done during mid-summer of 2021. In between these two projects our neighborhood will have to deal with unrest because of the two George Floyd trials. This will rob us of another year of piece and normality in are neighborhood. I would like some kind of break. I do understand this work need to be done, but this is not the right time for this work to be done. Please reconsider to push this project back another year. Thank you for your time. Brenda Short (612) 384-5483 [email protected] B.Short From: Brenda Short To: City Clerk Subject: [EXTERNAL] 2nd objection to the resurfacing project in south minneapolis Date: Monday, February 15, 2021 11:28:16 AM Attachments: Minneapolis - Gas Meter - FAQ (1).pdf Date: February 13,2021 Property ID: 02-028-24-12-0110 Address: 3027 14th avenue south, Minneapolis, MN 55407 Owner name & Taxpayer of above address: Brenda Short Dear Mayor Frey, Transportation and Public Works committee, and Minneapolis City Council: After attending the virtual meeting on February 10,2021, I felt the need to send a 2nd written objection. I am one of the few people of color who own their home in the south Minneapolis area. I attended this meeting because I had major concerns about this project, because this project is attached to the center point energy project. In the letter addressed to the homeowner, it stated that this informal meeting is to address any questions that I may have about this project and related assessment. I came to this meeting with only four questions. I was only allowed to ask two questions before CenterPoint Energy representative Al, silenced me at the meeting ,like I was some small child who had concerns that did not need to be heard. I felt disrespected as a taxpayer and a homeowner. Why I felt more disrespected because shortly after they silenced me at this meeting another homeowner had similar concerns. They did not silent or asked this homeowner to take these issues offline. My concerns are valid concerns and should have been heard during this meeting. I have attached my four questions below. My major concerns are about center point energy third party company Michal’s. Michal’s who is doing the work for this project. No one from this company attended this meeting ,but if they are doing the work, why were they asked not to attend this important meeting? My concerns had to deal with how Michal ‘s handled homeowner safety in their home while doing this same project from the summer of 2020. Even though I am a homeowner I am also a project manager of a rental property in south Minneapolis, two of my renters was sexual harassed in their home. Renters complained about how they asked Michal ‘s staff to wear a masked in their home, they refused the renters request. In my previous objection letter, I stated how the safety of my elderly mother was jeopardize and my home was damage during this work. Center point energy or Michal ‘s has not addressed my concerns or issue for this same project that was done in 2020. So how can the say they can handle this same project if they have not deal with the current concerns from the summer of 2020. when asked about these concerns all Center point energy did was send a link to a letter that say they will handle it. They still have not handle these concerns from 2020 , how can they say they will handle our issues in 2021. In a letter center point energy sent me . it states the street repair cost would not go to the homeowners. If this is true, why are the homeowner receiving a bill from the city? Per the meeting the street repairs are due to Center point energy removing meters and drilling 6 feet holes in our street. I am refusing to pay this cost of this restore. Because I have a letter from center point energy, I have attached this letter below as well. I believe this work is unnecessary. In the 28 years I lived in my home, the gas company has never done any maintenance/ or repair in my home. I have never had a gas company employee in my home for any kind of work. When they started this project in 2013, they did not speak to the homeowners. They just started to do this work, they did not think about the people who lives in these homes and how this project would affect them and their home. This project only helps the gas company , this does not help the homeowner , and because the gas company want to do some unnecessary upgrade, that will cause damage to my home, yard, and street, you want me to pay for something that was not necessary when they clearly said the cost of this work would not go to the homeowner. But now the city sent a bill that say I must pay for the damage the gas company did to my property and street. This street repair does nothing to the value of my home.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2012 ADC Executive Summary
    22001122 CCEDAR­­RRIVERSIDE CCOMMUNITY SSPACE SSTUDY FFINAL RREPORT Cedar‐Riverside Community Space Study – September 2012 ADC Executive Summary The Cedar Riverside neighborhood is home to over 7,000 residents and numerous organizations that need space for meeting, gathering, performing, educational, social service, and other types of activities. Often times, the demand for space is greater than the supply in this densely populated neighborhood. In order to determine the community spaces available and types of community spaces most needed in the neighborhood, the African Development Center (ADC) conducted a community space study, with financial support from the Cedar Riverside Neighborhood Revitalization Program. After extensive outreach and information gathering, the ADC found that the Cedar Riverside neighborhood is sometimes lacking in both knowledge of and access to currently available community spaces. In order to increase the level of awareness of available space in the Cedar Riverside neighborhood, ADC has created a Space Inventory document, which can be found here as an appendix, as well as on ADC’s website. The space inventory provides information regarding specific locations and rental terms of available space in Cedar Riverside. ADC expects that this inventory will help community members to better utilize space currently available in the neighborhood. Despite the fact that several neighborhood organizations are willing to open their doors for community use, there is still a major need for more spaces. Neighborhood representatives reported that the greatest desires are: community spaces for youth recreation and related services, fitness/exercise activities, adult/elder activities, large events/gatherings and social services. Despite many creative and cooperative approaches occurring to meet space needs among organizations large and small, there are still significant unmet needs.
    [Show full text]
  • U of M Minneapolis Area Neighborhood Impact Report
    Moving Forward Together: U of M Minneapolis Area Neighborhood Impact Report Appendices 1 2 Table of Contents Appendix 1: CEDAR RIVERSIDE: Neighborhood Profi le .....................5 Appendix 15: Maps: U of M Faculty and Staff Living in University Appendix 2: MARCY-HOLMES: Neighborhood Profi le .........................7 Neighborhoods .......................................................................27 Appendix 3: PROSPECT PARK: Neighborhood Profi le ..........................9 Appendix 16: Maps: U of M Twin Cities Campus Laborshed ....................28 Appendix 4: SOUTHEAST COMO: Neighborhood Profi le ...................11 Appendix 17: Maps: Residential Parcel Designation ...................................29 Appendix 5: UNIVERSITY DISTRICT: Neighborhood Profi le ......... 13 Appendix 18: Federal Facilities Impact Model ........................................... 30 Appendix 6: Map: U of M neighborhood business district ....................... 15 Appendix 19: Crime Data .............................................................................. 31 Appendix 7: Commercial District Profi le: Stadium Village .....................16 Appendix 20: Examples and Best Practices ..................................................32 Appendix 8: Commercial District Profi le: Dinkytown .............................18 Appendix 21: Examples of Prior Planning and Development Appendix 9: Commercial District Profi le: Cedar Riverside .................... 20 Collaboratives in the District ................................................38 Appendix 10: Residential
    [Show full text]
  • Improvin G Water Quality in the Minneapolis Chain of Lakes and Minnehaha Creek: Stakeholders and Potential Strategies
    NPCR 1053 Improvin_g Water Quality in the Minneapolis Chain of Lakes and Minnehaha Creek: Stakeholders and Potential Strategies A CONSORTIUM PROJECT OF: Augsburg College; College of St. Catherine; Hamline University; Higher Education Consortium for Urban Affairs; Macalester College; Metropolitan State University; Minneapolis Community College; Minneapolis Neighborhood Revitalization Program; University of Minnesota (Center for Urban and Regional Affairs; Children, Youth and Family Consortium; Minnesota Extension Service); University of St. Thomas; and Minneapolis community and neighborhood representatives. CURA RESOURCE COLLECTION Center for Urban and Regional Affairs University of Minnesota 330 Humphrey Center Improving Water Quality in the Minneapolis Chain of Lakes and Minnehaha Creek: Stakeholders and Potential Strategies Report prepared for the Lynnhurst Neighborhood Natural Environment Committee Andrzej Kozlowski Center for Urban and Regional Affairs, University of Minnesota February, 1997 -==:. February, 1997 Neighborhood Planning for Community Revitalization (NPCR) supported the work of the author of this report but has not reviewed it for publication. The content is solely the responsibility of the author and is not necessarily endorsed by NPCR. NPCR is coordinated by the Center for Urban and Regional Affairs at the University of Minnesota and is funded in part by an Urban Community Service Program grant administered by the U.S. Department of Education. NPCR 330 lilI Center 301 19th Avenue South Minneapolis, MN 55455 phone: 612/625-1020 e-mail: [email protected] TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Introduction ................................................................................3 II. The major stakeholders ...................................................................3 III. Preliminary list of potential strategies for improving water quality ................ 16 IV. Summary: discussion of partnerships and areas of future exploration ..............20 V.
    [Show full text]
  • CEDAR-ISLES-DEAN NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION Annual Members Meeting Minutes, May 12, 7-8:30 P.M
    CEDAR-ISLES-DEAN NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION Annual Members Meeting Minutes, May 12, 7-8:30 p.m. Online via Zoom Minutes by Rosanne Halloran Board members present: Chair Mary Pattock, Vice Chair Tim Sheridan, Secretary Rosanne Halloran, Dean Kephart, Claire Ruebeck, Amanda Vallone and CIDNA Coordinator Michael Jon Olson. Absent: Evan Carlson, Stephen Goltry, Treasurer Kevin Johnson Invited guests: Lisa Goodman / Minneapolis City Council Member - Ward 7, Marion Greene / Hennepin County Commissioner - District 3, and CIDNA accountant Robert Thompson. About 25 community members were also present. Call to order: Mary Pattock, Chair • Mary called the meeting to order at 7:04 p.m. The board approved the meeting agenda and the April 14, 2021 meeting minutes. Mary welcomed attendees and invited them to consider running for board membership later in the meeting. • She welcomed CIDNA’s new coordinator, Michael Jon Olson, who comes to CIDNA with extensive neighborhood organization experience and management skills. He reviewed the Zoom meeting protocols with attendees. Financial Report / Robert Thompson, CIDNA Accountant Robert said CIDNA is financially healthy. In addition to ongoing City funding, we have access to $18,000 previously contracted but unspent, which must be spent by the end of December. Our loan to Propel for affordable housing was paid back; those $134K Minneapolis Neighborhood Revitalization Program (NRP) dollars can be used again for housing or other projects allowable under NRP legislation. Annual Report / Mary Pattock, Chair • CIDNA made substantial progress in community engagement this year, due in part to Communication Committee activities, including the “Take a Look at CIDNA” Facebook project, and the neighborhood survey, which has nearly 200 responses so far.
    [Show full text]
  • 03 Prospect Park
    NPS Form 10-900-a (Rev. 8/2002) OMB No. 1024-0018 (Expires 5-31-2012) United States Department of the Interior Prospect Park ResidentialPut Here Historic District National Park Service Name of Property Hennepin County, MN County and State National Register of Historic Places N/A Continuation Sheet Name of multiple listing (if applicable) Section number 8 Page 1 NARRATIVE STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE The civil engineers who laid out the Prospect Park plats, Samuel Harlan Baker and Joseph H. Gilmore, were influenced by the work of their contemporary, Horace William Shaler (H. W. S.) Cleveland, and the picturesque landscape designs that are a hallmark of the era. Upon the framework of these plats, the residents shaped Prospect Park’s character and appearance. The neighborhood is significant as the home of the first community association in the city of Minneapolis, the Prospect Park Improvement Association (PPIA). The PPIA quickly established itself as a major influence, effecting changes ranging from the removal of weeds to the construction of the neighborhood’s iconic water tower. The community’s culture was enriched by its proximity to the University of Minnesota, which drew many academics to Prospect Park. The Prospect Park Historic District is one of three suburban-type developments that were established in Minneapolis in the late nineteenth century. While the architectural design in the other two, Kenwood and Washburn Park, is relatively homogeneous, following the pattern of many of the city’s neighborhoods, the houses in Prospect Park display a spectrum of the residential styles that appeared in Minneapolis during the late nineteenth century and the twentieth century.
    [Show full text]
  • Ballot Question Regarding a Proposed Amendment to the Minneapolis City Charter, for The
    STATE OF MINNESOTA DISTRICT COURT COUNTY OF HENNEPIN FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT CASE TYPE: CIVIL – OTHER Yes 4 Minneapolis, Court File No. _________________ Petitioner, PETITION TO CORRECT BALLOT v. UNDER MINN. STAT. § 204B.44 City of Minneapolis and Casey Joe Carl, in his official capacity as City Clerk of the City of Minneapolis, Respondents. The Petitioner Yes 4 Minneapolis, through its counsel, brings this Petition under Minn. Stat. § 204B.44 (Errors or Omissions) to correct the errors, omissions, and wrongful acts of Respondents City of Minneapolis (the “City”) and Casey Joe Carl, in his official capacity as City Clerk and chief election official of the City of Minneapolis (“Mr. Carl” or “City Clerk”). INTRODUCTION On July 23, 2021, the Minneapolis City Council unlawfully added an “Explanatory Note” to a ballot question regarding a proposed amendment to the Minneapolis City Charter, for the City’s November 2, 2021 general election. If passed, the amendment would establish a Department of Public Safety. The “Explanatory Note” should be stricken from the ballot because it is not authorized by law and is also a misleading partial description of the impact of the proposed amendment. 30416.0001 – 5333203.1 To be clear, this Petition does not address the merits of the ballot question itself, but challenges the addition of the “Explanatory Note.” The ballot question fully and fairly explains the proposed amendment’s “essential purpose.”1 The City Council exceeded its power by adding its own subjective version of what will happen if the amendment passes. For proposed charter amendments, Minnesota law authorizes that a ballot question include only a description “sufficient to identify the amendment clearly and to distinguish the question from every other question on the ballot at the same time.” Minn.
    [Show full text]
  • Charter Commission
    Council President Lisa Bender 350 S. Fifth St. – Room 307 Minneapolis, MN 55415 TEL 612.673.2204 August 5, 2020 To the Members of the Minneapolis Charter Commission: Thank you for your consideration of the City Council’s proposed charter amendment this past month. Our commitment, as expressed in the resolution passed by the City Council on June 12, 2020, is to transform the way we provide for community safety and respond to decades of failed reforms and deepening mistrust in the Minneapolis Police Department. Our constituents have called for structural change using words like “defund” and “disband” to describe our current, broken system alongside aspirational language like “transform” and “reimagine” as we begin the work toward the system we believe is possible, in which everyone feels safe. As elected representatives in a city demanding systemic change, we are proposing a charter amendment that allows us to meaningfully reimagine our city’s approach to safety. We expect the transformed system to include law enforcement as part of a multi-faceted approach to public safety. As you know, the charter amendment replaces the charter-mandated Police Department with a Department of Community Safety and Violence Prevention. It also states that “the Council may maintain a division of protective law enforcement services, composed of licensed Minnesota Peace Officers, subject to the supervision of the department of community safety and violence prevention.” From a governing perspective, there are two reasons why we used the word “may” instead of “shall.” First, it ensures the possibility that the City could choose to contract with another jurisdiction for public safety services if it made sense to do so, as many other towns and cities do.
    [Show full text]
  • Minneapolis City of Lakes
    This document is made available electronically by the Minnesota Legislative Reference Library as part of an ongoing digital archiving project. http://www.leg.state.mn.us/lrl/lrl.asp minneapolis city of lakes March 19, 1991 The Honorable Jerome M. Hughes The Honorable Robert Vanasek President of the Senate Speaker of the House of Representatives State of Minnesota State of Minnesota 328 State Capitol 463 State Office Building st. Paul, MN 55155 st. Paul, MN 55155 Dear Sirs: Pursuant to Minnesota Laws 1990, Chapter 604, a Neighborhood Revitalization Program has been established for the City of Minneapolis. The following is the report from the City of Minneapolis to the Legislature as required by Section 29, Subdivision 2, of Chapter 604. 1. The Policy Board was formed and has been meeting regularly since March 7, 1990. The core membership of that Board includes: (a) The leadership of the City and the boards of Hennepin county, Minneapolis Public Schools, Minneapolis Parks and Recreation and Minneapolis Library; and (b) A member from each of the Minneapolis Senate and House delegations. These core members have appointed nine additional members: (c) Four (4) neighborhood representatives; and (d) The chief executives of the Minneapolis Chamber of Commerce, the Minneapolis Central Labor Union, the Urban Coalition of Minneapolis, the Greater Minneapolis United Way and the Minneapolis Foundation; [A current roster of Policy Board members is attached.] 2. The City of Minneapolis, on June 21, 1990, established a Neighborhood Revita1ization Program and committed $10 million in 1990 and $20 million per year for the period 1991-2009 for this Program's activities.
    [Show full text]
  • City Council Proceedings – December 7, 2018
    OFFICIAL PROCEEDINGS MINNEAPOLIS CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING OF DECEMBER 7, 2018 (Published December 15, 2018, in Finance and Commerce) CALL TO ORDER Council President Bender called the meeting to order at 9:30 a.m. in the Council Chamber, a quorum being present. Present - Council Members Kevin Reich, Cam Gordon, Steve Fletcher, Phillipe Cunningham, Jeremiah Ellison, Abdi Warsame, Lisa Goodman, Andrea Jenkins, Alondra Cano, Jeremy Schroeder, Andrew Johnson, Linea Palmisano, President Lisa Bender. Council Rule VIII (2) (D) was suspended by President Bender who offered the courtesy of the floor to Representative-elect Ilhan Omar, Congressional District 5, who addressed the City Council, former colleagues, and constituents. A moment of silence was held in recognition of the passing of former Council Member Walter Dziedzic. Jenkins moved adoption of the agenda. On motion by Jenkins, the agenda was amended to include under the Order of New Business the consideration of a confidentiality agreement in connection with possible acquisition of leased property interests from Sears Holding Corporation at 10 W Lake St. The agenda, as amended, was adopted. On motion by Jenkins, the minutes of the regular meeting of November 16, 2018, and the adjourned sessions held November 14, 2018, and November 28, 2018, were accepted. On motion by Jenkins, the petitions, communications, and reports were referred to the proper Committees. The following actions, resolutions, and ordinances were signed by Mayor Jacob Frey on December 10, 2018. Minnesota Statutes, Section 331A.01, Subd 10, allows for summary publication of ordinances and resolutions in the official newspaper of the city. A complete copy of each summarized ordinance and resolution is available for public inspection in the Office of City Clerk.
    [Show full text]
  • Making Visions a Reality 1999 Minneapolis NRP Policy Board
    ood ighborh Revitaliz s Ne atio oli n P ap ro ne 1990-2000 Progress Report gr in am M Making Visions a Reality 1999 Minneapolis NRP Policy Board Sharon Sayles Belton, Minneapolis Mayor Emmet Carson, President, The Minneapolis Foundation Jackie Cherryhomes, President, Minneapolis City Council Karen Clark, Minnesota State Representative James Colville, Director, Greater Minneapolis United Way Bob Fine, President, Minneapolis Park & Recreation Board Judy Farmer, Chairperson, Minneapolis Public School Board Diane Hofstede, President, Minneapolis Public Library Board David M. Jennings, President, Greater Minneapolis Chamber of Commerce Dick Johnson, President, Minneapolis Central Labor Union Nicholas Kakos, Protection Neighborhood Representative Peter McLaughlin, Commissioner, Hennepin County Board Clareyse Nelson, Redirection Neighborhood Representative Gretchen Nicholls, At-Large Neighborhood Representative john a. powell, Executive Director, Institute on Race & Poverty Galen Robinson, Revitalization Neighborhood Representative Mark Stenglein, Commissioner, Hennepin County Board Mary Tamborino, Commissioner, Hennepin County Board Alternates Kelly Altmeyer, Greater Minneapolis Chamber of Commerce Earnest Belton, Commissioner, Minneapolis Park & Recreation Board Ann Berget, Minneapolis Public School Board Lisa Goodman, Minneapolis City Council Hubert (Buck) Humphrey IV, Protection Neighborhood Representative Ken Kelash, Minneapolis Central Labor Union Byron Laher, Greater Minneapolis United Way Kathryn Roberts, Minneapolis Foundation Judy
    [Show full text]
  • Official Proceedings Minneapolis City Council
    OFFICIAL PROCEEDINGS MINNEAPOLIS CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING OF FEBRUARY 26, 2021 ————— (Published March 6, 2021 in Finance and Commerce) ————— CALL TO ORDER Council President Bender called the meeting to order at 9:30 a.m., a quorum being present. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 13D.021, the meeting was held by electronic means and Council Members participated remotely due to the local public health emergency (novel coronavirus pandemic) declared on March 16, 2020. Present - Council Members Kevin Reich, Cam Gordon, Steve Fletcher, Phillipe Cunningham, Jeremiah Ellison, Jamal Osman, Lisa Goodman, Andrea Jenkins, Alondra Cano, Lisa Bender, Jeremy Schroeder, Andrew Johnson, Linea Palmisano. Jenkins moved to adopt the agenda. On roll call, the result was: Ayes: Reich, Fletcher, Cunningham, Ellison, Osman, Goodman, Jenkins, Cano, Bender, Schroeder, Johnson, Palmisano (12) Noes: (0) Absent: Gordon (1) Adopted. Jenkins moved to accept the minutes of the regular meeting of February 12, 2021. On roll call, the result was: Ayes: Reich, Fletcher, Cunningham, Ellison, Osman, Goodman, Jenkins, Cano, Bender, Schroeder, Johnson, Palmisano (12) Noes: (0) Absent: Gordon (1) Adopted. Jenkins moved to refer the peti- tions, communications, and reports to the proper Committees. On roll call, the result was: Ayes: Reich, Fletcher, Cunningham, Ellison, Osman, Goodman, Jenkins, Cano, Bender, Schroeder, Johnson, Palmisano (12) Noes: (0) Absent: Gordon (1) Adopted. The following actions, resolutions, and ordinances were signed by Mayor Jacob Frey on March 4, 2021. Minnesota Statutes, Section 331A.01, Subd 10, allows for summary publication of ordi nances and resolutions in the official newspaper of the city. A complete copy of each summarized ordinance and resolution is available for public inspection in the Office of City Clerk.
    [Show full text]
  • This Link Open a New Windowcouncil Proceedings
    OFFICIAL PROCEEDINGS MINNEAPOLIS CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING OF JUNE 26, 2020 (Published July 3, 2020, in Finance and Commerce) CALL TO ORDER Council President Bender called the meeting to order at 9:30 a.m., a quorum being present. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 13D.021, the meeting was held by electronic means and Council Members participated remotely due to the local public health emergency (novel coronavirus pandemic) declared on March 16, 2020. Present - Council Members Kevin Reich, Cam Gordon, Steve Fletcher, Phillipe Cunningham, Jeremiah Ellison, Lisa Goodman, Andrea Jenkins, Alondra Cano, Lisa Bender, Jeremy Schroeder, Andrew Johnson, Linea Palmisano. Jenkins moved to adopt the agenda. On roll call, the result was: Ayes: Reich, Gordon, Fletcher, Cunningham, Ellison, Goodman, Jenkins, Bender, Schroeder, Johnson, Palmisano (11) Noes: (0) Absent: Cano (1) Adopted. Jenkins moved to accept the minutes of the regular meeting of June 12, 2020. On roll call, the result was: Ayes: Reich, Gordon, Fletcher, Cunningham, Ellison, Goodman, Jenkins, Bender, Schroeder, Johnson, Palmisano (11) Noes: (0) Absent: Cano (1) Adopted. Jenkins moved to refer the petitions, communications, and reports to the proper Committees. On roll call, the result was: Ayes: Reich, Gordon, Fletcher, Cunningham, Ellison, Goodman, Jenkins, Bender, Schroeder, Johnson, Palmisano (11) Noes: (0) Absent: Cano (1) Adopted. 493 City Council Proceedings – June 26, 2020 The following actions, resolutions, and ordinances were signed by Mayor Jacob Frey on June 29, 2020. Minnesota Statutes, Section 331A.01, Subd 10, allows for summary publication of ordinances and resolutions in the official newspaper of the city. A complete copy of each summarized ordinance and resolution is available for public inspection in the Office of City Clerk.
    [Show full text]