DOCSLIB.ORG

Key Informants

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Key Informants KEY INFORMANTS Mansoor Alyeshmerni Matthew Bower Stevens Square Community Grants & Special Projects Office Organization City of Minneapolis Barb Agard Maura Brown Hennepin County Training & Harrison Neighborhood Association Employment Assistance Richard Brustad Alan Arthur Brighton Development Central Community Housing Trust Roger Carlson Joe Barisonzi Office of the Assessor Communityleader.com City of Minneapolis (Formerly, Lyndale Neighborhood Association) Emmett Carson The Minneapolis Foundation Mark Battistini Information Technology Services William Carter City of Minneapolis Communications City of Minneapolis Maureen Bazinet Minneapolis Public Schools *Jackie Cherryhomes Council President, City of Minneapolis *Carol Berde Current Board Member and Former The McKnight Foundation Chair, Neighborhood Revitalization Program Policy Board *Ann Berget Former Board Member, Minneapolis Robert Chong Public Schools Minneapolis Community Development (Formerly, Chair, Evaluation Oversight Agency Committee, Neighborhood Revitalization Program Robert Cooper Policy Board) Minneapolis Community Development Agency Thomas Berthume Whittier Alliance William Craig Center for Urban and Regional Affairs Jerrold Boardman University of Minnesota Minneapolis Community Development Agency *Denotes member of the Neighborhood Revitalization Program Policy Board Evaluation Oversight Committee KEY INFORMANTS (cont.) Jim Gabler Steven Cramer Gabler Housing Solutions Minneapolis Community Development Agency *George Garnett Private Consultant (Formerly, The Rob Daves Minneapolis Foundation and Board Minneapolis Star Tribune Member, Neighborhood Revitalization Program Policy Board) Caren Dewar Dewar & Associates William Gavzy Gavzy & Gavzy & Associates Ellen Dosdall Division of Inspections, Department of Lisa Goodman Operations and Regulatory Services Council Member, City of Minneapolis City of Minneapolis Donna Harris Maureen Durand Department of Health and Family Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board Support, City of Minneapolis Mark Engebretson Don Haydon, Jr. Editor, University of MN Health Minneapolis Public Schools Sciences Department (Formerly Reporter, Southwest Journal) Robert Henderson Center for Energy and the Environment Paul Farmer Planning Director, Eugene, Oregon Elizabeth Hinz (Formerly, Planning Director, City of Minneapolis Public Schools Minneapolis) *Diane Hofstede David Fey Minneapolis Library Board and Board Seward Redesign Member, Neighborhood Revitalization Program Policy Board Dave Fisher Private Consultant (Former Joe Horan Superintendent, Minneapolis Park and Neighborhood Revitalization Program Recreation Board) John Hotvet Donald Fraser Department of Public Works Former Mayor, City of Minneapolis City of Minneapolis Tom Fulton Peter Hutchinson Family Housing Fund Public Strategies Group, (Formerly, Minneapolis Public Schools) KEY INFORMANTS (cont.) Jay Jensen Jana Metge Shelter Corporation (Former Executive Central Neighborhood Improvement Director, Minneapolis Community Association Development Agency) Robert Miller Clyde Kane Director, Neighborhood Revitalization Minneapolis Public Schools Program Dave King John Moir Center for Energy and the Environment Finance Department City of Minneapolis Jack Kryst Minneapolis Community Development Mike Monahan Agency SRF Consulting Group, Inc. (Formerly, Traffic Division, Department of Public Laura Lambert Works, City of Minneapolis) Planning Department, City of Minneapolis Christine Morris Police Department, City of Minneapolis Merwyn Larson Division of Inspections, Department of Iric Nathanson Operations and Regulatory Services Minneapolis Community Development City of Minneapolis Agency Barbara Lickness *Scott Neiman Neighborhood Revitalization Program Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board, (and Whittier Alliance) (Formerly, Board Member, Neighborhood Revitalization Program Gregory Lindberg Policy Board) Office of Planning & Development, Hennepin County Harrison Nelson Prospect Park East River Road Paula Mazzacano Improvement Association Minneapolis Community Development Agency Kris Nelson University of Minnesota, Center for Becky McIntosh Urban and Regional Affairs (Formerly, Department of Health and Family Whittier Alliance) Support, City of Minneapolis *Gretchen Nicholls Mary Merrill Anderson, Superintendent Minneapolis Center for Neighborhoods Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board Board Member, Neighborhood Revitalization Program Policy Board KEY INFORMANTS (cont.) Jim Niland Rip Rapson Council Member, City of Minneapolis The McKnight Foundation Dan Niziolek Scott Renne Police Department, City of Minneapolis Office of the Assessor City of Minneapolis Kathleen O’Brien City Coordinator, City of Minneapolis Kent Robbins Minneapolis Community Development Lynn Ogren Agency (Formerly, Council caucus aide, Division of Inspections, Department of Minneapolis City Council) Operations and Regulatory Services City of Minneapolis Sharon Sayles Belton Mayor, City of Minneapolis Al Olson Division of Inspections, Department of Tony Scallon Operations and Regulatory Services (Formerly, Council Member, City of City of Minneapolis Minneapolis) Carolyn Olson Jeff Schneider Greater Metropolitan Minneapolis Finance Department Housing Corporation City of Minneapolis Robert Olson *Judy Schwartau Police Department, City of Minneapolis (Formerly, At-Large Neighborhood Revitalization Program Policy Board Julia Paulsen Alternate) Planning Department City of Minneapolis Stacy Sorenson Neighborhood Revitalization Program Mary Peterson Windom Community Council Daryl Stokesbary Department of Planning Earl Pettiford City of Minneapolis Minneapolis Community Development Agency Donald Snyder Minneapolis Community Development Larry Pogemiller Agency Minnesota State Senate Thavisack Silaphet Karen Pritz Planning Department Hale Page Diamond Lake Community City of Minneapolis Association (Formerly, Board Member, Neighborhood Revitalization Policy Board) KEY INFORMANTS (cont.) *Mary Tambornino Hennepin County Board Member (Formerly, Board Member of the Neighborhood Revitalization Program Policy Board) Arlin Waelti Gray, Plant, Mooty, Mooty & Bennett, Attorneys at Law Chip Wells Minneapolis Employment and Training Department of Health and Family Support Jack Whitehurst Neighborhood Revitalization Program Paul Williams Twin Cities Local Initiatives Support Corporation (Formerly, The Minneapolis Foundation) Rebecca Yanisch Ryan Companies (Formerly, Executive Director, Minneapolis Community Development Agency) Sue Zarling Minnesota Department of Transportation (Formerly, Traffic Division, Minneapolis Department of Public Works) Suzanne Zorn Lowry Hill Residents, Inc..
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2012 ADC Executive Summary
    22001122 CCEDAR­­RRIVERSIDE CCOMMUNITY SSPACE SSTUDY FFINAL RREPORT Cedar‐Riverside Community Space Study – September 2012 ADC Executive Summary The Cedar Riverside neighborhood is home to over 7,000 residents and numerous organizations that need space for meeting, gathering, performing, educational, social service, and other types of activities. Often times, the demand for space is greater than the supply in this densely populated neighborhood. In order to determine the community spaces available and types of community spaces most needed in the neighborhood, the African Development Center (ADC) conducted a community space study, with financial support from the Cedar Riverside Neighborhood Revitalization Program. After extensive outreach and information gathering, the ADC found that the Cedar Riverside neighborhood is sometimes lacking in both knowledge of and access to currently available community spaces. In order to increase the level of awareness of available space in the Cedar Riverside neighborhood, ADC has created a Space Inventory document, which can be found here as an appendix, as well as on ADC’s website. The space inventory provides information regarding specific locations and rental terms of available space in Cedar Riverside. ADC expects that this inventory will help community members to better utilize space currently available in the neighborhood. Despite the fact that several neighborhood organizations are willing to open their doors for community use, there is still a major need for more spaces. Neighborhood representatives reported that the greatest desires are: community spaces for youth recreation and related services, fitness/exercise activities, adult/elder activities, large events/gatherings and social services. Despite many creative and cooperative approaches occurring to meet space needs among organizations large and small, there are still significant unmet needs.
    [Show full text]
  • U of M Minneapolis Area Neighborhood Impact Report
    Moving Forward Together: U of M Minneapolis Area Neighborhood Impact Report Appendices 1 2 Table of Contents Appendix 1: CEDAR RIVERSIDE: Neighborhood Profi le .....................5 Appendix 15: Maps: U of M Faculty and Staff Living in University Appendix 2: MARCY-HOLMES: Neighborhood Profi le .........................7 Neighborhoods .......................................................................27 Appendix 3: PROSPECT PARK: Neighborhood Profi le ..........................9 Appendix 16: Maps: U of M Twin Cities Campus Laborshed ....................28 Appendix 4: SOUTHEAST COMO: Neighborhood Profi le ...................11 Appendix 17: Maps: Residential Parcel Designation ...................................29 Appendix 5: UNIVERSITY DISTRICT: Neighborhood Profi le ......... 13 Appendix 18: Federal Facilities Impact Model ........................................... 30 Appendix 6: Map: U of M neighborhood business district ....................... 15 Appendix 19: Crime Data .............................................................................. 31 Appendix 7: Commercial District Profi le: Stadium Village .....................16 Appendix 20: Examples and Best Practices ..................................................32 Appendix 8: Commercial District Profi le: Dinkytown .............................18 Appendix 21: Examples of Prior Planning and Development Appendix 9: Commercial District Profi le: Cedar Riverside .................... 20 Collaboratives in the District ................................................38 Appendix 10: Residential
    [Show full text]
  • Improvin G Water Quality in the Minneapolis Chain of Lakes and Minnehaha Creek: Stakeholders and Potential Strategies
    NPCR 1053 Improvin_g Water Quality in the Minneapolis Chain of Lakes and Minnehaha Creek: Stakeholders and Potential Strategies A CONSORTIUM PROJECT OF: Augsburg College; College of St. Catherine; Hamline University; Higher Education Consortium for Urban Affairs; Macalester College; Metropolitan State University; Minneapolis Community College; Minneapolis Neighborhood Revitalization Program; University of Minnesota (Center for Urban and Regional Affairs; Children, Youth and Family Consortium; Minnesota Extension Service); University of St. Thomas; and Minneapolis community and neighborhood representatives. CURA RESOURCE COLLECTION Center for Urban and Regional Affairs University of Minnesota 330 Humphrey Center Improving Water Quality in the Minneapolis Chain of Lakes and Minnehaha Creek: Stakeholders and Potential Strategies Report prepared for the Lynnhurst Neighborhood Natural Environment Committee Andrzej Kozlowski Center for Urban and Regional Affairs, University of Minnesota February, 1997 -==:. February, 1997 Neighborhood Planning for Community Revitalization (NPCR) supported the work of the author of this report but has not reviewed it for publication. The content is solely the responsibility of the author and is not necessarily endorsed by NPCR. NPCR is coordinated by the Center for Urban and Regional Affairs at the University of Minnesota and is funded in part by an Urban Community Service Program grant administered by the U.S. Department of Education. NPCR 330 lilI Center 301 19th Avenue South Minneapolis, MN 55455 phone: 612/625-1020 e-mail: [email protected] TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Introduction ................................................................................3 II. The major stakeholders ...................................................................3 III. Preliminary list of potential strategies for improving water quality ................ 16 IV. Summary: discussion of partnerships and areas of future exploration ..............20 V.
    [Show full text]
  • Ruth Adler Schnee 2015 Kresge Eminent Artist the Kresge Eminent Artist Award
    Ruth Adler Schnee 2015 Kresge Eminent Artist The Kresge Eminent Artist Award honors an exceptional artist in the visual, performing or literary arts for lifelong professional achievements and contributions to metropolitan Detroit’s cultural community. Ruth Adler Schnee is the 2015 Left: Keys, 1949. (© Victoria and Albert Museum, London); right: drawing, Glyphs, 1947. Kresge Eminent Artist. This (Courtesy Cranbrook Archives, The Edward and Ruth Adler Schnee Papers.) monograph commemorates her Shown on cover background: Fancy Free, 1949. (Photograph by R.H. Hensleigh and Tim Thayer, life and work. courtesy Cranbrook Art Museum); top left: Woodleaves, 1998; top right: Narrow Gauge, 1957; top center: Bells, 1995; bottom center: Funhouse, 2000; bottom: Plaid, 2001 reissue. Contents 5 57 Foreword Other Voices: By Rip Rapson Tributes and Reflections President and CEO Nancy E. Villa Bryk The Kresge Foundation Lois Pincus Cohn 6 David DiChiera Artist’s Statement Maxine Frankel Bill Harris Life Gerhardt Knoedel 10 Naomi Long Madgett Destiny Detroit Bill Rauhauser By Ruth Adler Schnee 61 13 Biography Transcendent Vision By Sue Levytsky Kresge Arts In Detroit 21 68 Return to Influence Our Congratulations By Gregory Wittkopp From Michelle Perron 22 Director, Kresge Arts in Detroit Generative Design 69 By Ronit Eisenbach A Note From Richard L. Rogers President Design College for Creative Studies 25 70 Inspiration: Modernism 2014-15 Kresge Arts in By Ruth Adler Schnee Detroit Advisory Council 33 Designs That Sing The Kresge Eminent Artist By R.F. Levine Award and Winners 37 72 The Fabric of Her Life: About The Kresge A Timeline Foundation 45 Shaping Contemporary Board of Trustees Living: Career Highlights Credits Community Acknowledgements 51 Between Two Worlds By Glen Mannisto 54 Once Upon a Time at Adler-Schnee, the Store By Gloria Casella Right: Drawing, Raindrops, 1947.
    [Show full text]
  • CEDAR-ISLES-DEAN NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION Annual Members Meeting Minutes, May 12, 7-8:30 P.M
    CEDAR-ISLES-DEAN NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION Annual Members Meeting Minutes, May 12, 7-8:30 p.m. Online via Zoom Minutes by Rosanne Halloran Board members present: Chair Mary Pattock, Vice Chair Tim Sheridan, Secretary Rosanne Halloran, Dean Kephart, Claire Ruebeck, Amanda Vallone and CIDNA Coordinator Michael Jon Olson. Absent: Evan Carlson, Stephen Goltry, Treasurer Kevin Johnson Invited guests: Lisa Goodman / Minneapolis City Council Member - Ward 7, Marion Greene / Hennepin County Commissioner - District 3, and CIDNA accountant Robert Thompson. About 25 community members were also present. Call to order: Mary Pattock, Chair • Mary called the meeting to order at 7:04 p.m. The board approved the meeting agenda and the April 14, 2021 meeting minutes. Mary welcomed attendees and invited them to consider running for board membership later in the meeting. • She welcomed CIDNA’s new coordinator, Michael Jon Olson, who comes to CIDNA with extensive neighborhood organization experience and management skills. He reviewed the Zoom meeting protocols with attendees. Financial Report / Robert Thompson, CIDNA Accountant Robert said CIDNA is financially healthy. In addition to ongoing City funding, we have access to $18,000 previously contracted but unspent, which must be spent by the end of December. Our loan to Propel for affordable housing was paid back; those $134K Minneapolis Neighborhood Revitalization Program (NRP) dollars can be used again for housing or other projects allowable under NRP legislation. Annual Report / Mary Pattock, Chair • CIDNA made substantial progress in community engagement this year, due in part to Communication Committee activities, including the “Take a Look at CIDNA” Facebook project, and the neighborhood survey, which has nearly 200 responses so far.
    [Show full text]
  • Detroit's Grand Bargain
    Detroit’s Grand Bargain Philanthropy as a Catalyst for a Brighter Future Irene Hirano Inouye Philanthropic Leadership Fund The Center on Philanthropy & Public Policy University of Southern California About the Center on Phil AnthroPy & PubliC PoliCy The Center on Philanthropy and Public Policy promotes more effective philanthropy and strengthens the nonprofit sector through research that informs philanthropic decision-making and public policy to advance public problem solving. Using California and the West as a laboratory, The Center conducts research on philanthropy, volunteerism, and the role of the nonprofit sector in America’s communities. In order to make the research a catalyst for understanding and action, The Center encourages communication among the philanthropic, nonprofit, and policy communities. This is accomplished through a series of convenings and conversations around research findings and policy issues to help key decision makers work together more effectively to solve public problems and to identify strategies for action. This case study is underwritten by the Irene Hirano The Center on Philanthropy & Public Policy Inouye Philanthropic Leadership Fund at The Center Sol Price School of Public Policy on Philanthropy & Public Policy. University of Southern California We want to acknowledge the assistance of Michael Lewis Hall, Room 210 Thom, and the insights and perspectives offered Los Angeles, California 90089-0626 by the individuals interviewed for this case. Listed Phone: (213) 740-9492 at the end of the case, they included many of the Email: [email protected] principals involved in the Grand Bargain. Website: cppp.usc.edu An electronic copy of the case can be downloaded Copyright ©2017 by on The Center’s website at cppp.usc.edu.
    [Show full text]
  • Prioritizing-Place-A
    The Center on Philanthropy & Public Policy Sol Price Center for Social Innovation PrioritizingPlace A National Forum on Place-Based Initiatives December 4 – 5, 2014 Davidson Conference Center University of Southern California Sol Price School of Public Policy Forum Sponsors Welcome Dear Colleague, We are delighted you could join us for Prioritizing Place: A National Forum on Place-Based Initiatives. This gathering is the culmination of a year-long inquiry into the state of philanthropic initiatives and public sector efforts to address geographically-concentrated poverty, undertaken by The Center on Philanthropy and Public Policy and the Sol Price Center for Social Innovation. This inquiry has provided an opportunity to step back and take a thoughtful look at the experience of place-based initiatives – whether undertaken by philanthropy or government or a combination of the sectors. We hope that this forum helps to elevate the dialogue above specific best practices or discussions about what works to embrace the larger significance and longevity of place-based as a strategy for the field, and that the insights generated over these two days will be useful to philanthropic and public decision makers as they chart their strategies for moving forward. Our effort has been spearheaded by Elwood Hopkins of Emerging Markets. We have been guided by a first-rate national advisory board. Based on their advice and recommendations, we framed the intellectual agenda for this inquiry and identified leading experts to participate in five small and focused discussions – held in Los Angeles, New York, and Washington, D.C. from April to June 2014 – addressing a different aspect of place-based work.
    [Show full text]
  • 03 Prospect Park
    NPS Form 10-900-a (Rev. 8/2002) OMB No. 1024-0018 (Expires 5-31-2012) United States Department of the Interior Prospect Park ResidentialPut Here Historic District National Park Service Name of Property Hennepin County, MN County and State National Register of Historic Places N/A Continuation Sheet Name of multiple listing (if applicable) Section number 8 Page 1 NARRATIVE STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE The civil engineers who laid out the Prospect Park plats, Samuel Harlan Baker and Joseph H. Gilmore, were influenced by the work of their contemporary, Horace William Shaler (H. W. S.) Cleveland, and the picturesque landscape designs that are a hallmark of the era. Upon the framework of these plats, the residents shaped Prospect Park’s character and appearance. The neighborhood is significant as the home of the first community association in the city of Minneapolis, the Prospect Park Improvement Association (PPIA). The PPIA quickly established itself as a major influence, effecting changes ranging from the removal of weeds to the construction of the neighborhood’s iconic water tower. The community’s culture was enriched by its proximity to the University of Minnesota, which drew many academics to Prospect Park. The Prospect Park Historic District is one of three suburban-type developments that were established in Minneapolis in the late nineteenth century. While the architectural design in the other two, Kenwood and Washburn Park, is relatively homogeneous, following the pattern of many of the city’s neighborhoods, the houses in Prospect Park display a spectrum of the residential styles that appeared in Minneapolis during the late nineteenth century and the twentieth century.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Comment Phillips South Powderhorn and 35Th St E Street
    Date: February 2,2021 Property ID: 02-028-24-12-0110 Address: 3027 14th avenue south, Minneapolis, MN 55407 Owner name & Taxpayer of above address: Brenda Short Dear Mayor Frey, Transportation and Public Works committee, and Minneapolis City Council: I am writing to you to object to the above resurfacing project. By allowing this project during a time of morning of four men and one 18-year-old woman who lost their live on these same streets you are trying to cover. As a Mother of four children, I am very disappointed on how the city of Minneapolis, has handled a lot of issues in the Year 2020. This being said ,I do not believe that this is not the correct time morally or financially for this work to be done. Many homeowners like myself had to take fewer hours at work or was asked to take furloughs, or just lost their job. On top of the financial stress due to cov-19. Homeowners is still dealing with the emotional stress that the city of Minneapolis and city council has forced upon them. Shortly after the George Floyd riot many homeowners like myself found out about families in need at our local parks. Is stead of getting help for these people from the city or mayor or Hennepin county. Homeowners and volunteers were force into unpaid roles as, social workers, and financial assistant workers. we tried to help the people unfortunate during a time of need. The city and law enforcement abused them and destroyed the little property and dignity these people have.
    [Show full text]
  • Ballot Question Regarding a Proposed Amendment to the Minneapolis City Charter, for The
    STATE OF MINNESOTA DISTRICT COURT COUNTY OF HENNEPIN FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT CASE TYPE: CIVIL – OTHER Yes 4 Minneapolis, Court File No. _________________ Petitioner, PETITION TO CORRECT BALLOT v. UNDER MINN. STAT. § 204B.44 City of Minneapolis and Casey Joe Carl, in his official capacity as City Clerk of the City of Minneapolis, Respondents. The Petitioner Yes 4 Minneapolis, through its counsel, brings this Petition under Minn. Stat. § 204B.44 (Errors or Omissions) to correct the errors, omissions, and wrongful acts of Respondents City of Minneapolis (the “City”) and Casey Joe Carl, in his official capacity as City Clerk and chief election official of the City of Minneapolis (“Mr. Carl” or “City Clerk”). INTRODUCTION On July 23, 2021, the Minneapolis City Council unlawfully added an “Explanatory Note” to a ballot question regarding a proposed amendment to the Minneapolis City Charter, for the City’s November 2, 2021 general election. If passed, the amendment would establish a Department of Public Safety. The “Explanatory Note” should be stricken from the ballot because it is not authorized by law and is also a misleading partial description of the impact of the proposed amendment. 30416.0001 – 5333203.1 To be clear, this Petition does not address the merits of the ballot question itself, but challenges the addition of the “Explanatory Note.” The ballot question fully and fairly explains the proposed amendment’s “essential purpose.”1 The City Council exceeded its power by adding its own subjective version of what will happen if the amendment passes. For proposed charter amendments, Minnesota law authorizes that a ballot question include only a description “sufficient to identify the amendment clearly and to distinguish the question from every other question on the ballot at the same time.” Minn.
    [Show full text]
  • Charter Commission
    Council President Lisa Bender 350 S. Fifth St. – Room 307 Minneapolis, MN 55415 TEL 612.673.2204 August 5, 2020 To the Members of the Minneapolis Charter Commission: Thank you for your consideration of the City Council’s proposed charter amendment this past month. Our commitment, as expressed in the resolution passed by the City Council on June 12, 2020, is to transform the way we provide for community safety and respond to decades of failed reforms and deepening mistrust in the Minneapolis Police Department. Our constituents have called for structural change using words like “defund” and “disband” to describe our current, broken system alongside aspirational language like “transform” and “reimagine” as we begin the work toward the system we believe is possible, in which everyone feels safe. As elected representatives in a city demanding systemic change, we are proposing a charter amendment that allows us to meaningfully reimagine our city’s approach to safety. We expect the transformed system to include law enforcement as part of a multi-faceted approach to public safety. As you know, the charter amendment replaces the charter-mandated Police Department with a Department of Community Safety and Violence Prevention. It also states that “the Council may maintain a division of protective law enforcement services, composed of licensed Minnesota Peace Officers, subject to the supervision of the department of community safety and violence prevention.” From a governing perspective, there are two reasons why we used the word “may” instead of “shall.” First, it ensures the possibility that the City could choose to contract with another jurisdiction for public safety services if it made sense to do so, as many other towns and cities do.
    [Show full text]
  • Minneapolis City of Lakes
    This document is made available electronically by the Minnesota Legislative Reference Library as part of an ongoing digital archiving project. http://www.leg.state.mn.us/lrl/lrl.asp minneapolis city of lakes March 19, 1991 The Honorable Jerome M. Hughes The Honorable Robert Vanasek President of the Senate Speaker of the House of Representatives State of Minnesota State of Minnesota 328 State Capitol 463 State Office Building st. Paul, MN 55155 st. Paul, MN 55155 Dear Sirs: Pursuant to Minnesota Laws 1990, Chapter 604, a Neighborhood Revitalization Program has been established for the City of Minneapolis. The following is the report from the City of Minneapolis to the Legislature as required by Section 29, Subdivision 2, of Chapter 604. 1. The Policy Board was formed and has been meeting regularly since March 7, 1990. The core membership of that Board includes: (a) The leadership of the City and the boards of Hennepin county, Minneapolis Public Schools, Minneapolis Parks and Recreation and Minneapolis Library; and (b) A member from each of the Minneapolis Senate and House delegations. These core members have appointed nine additional members: (c) Four (4) neighborhood representatives; and (d) The chief executives of the Minneapolis Chamber of Commerce, the Minneapolis Central Labor Union, the Urban Coalition of Minneapolis, the Greater Minneapolis United Way and the Minneapolis Foundation; [A current roster of Policy Board members is attached.] 2. The City of Minneapolis, on June 21, 1990, established a Neighborhood Revita1ization Program and committed $10 million in 1990 and $20 million per year for the period 1991-2009 for this Program's activities.
    [Show full text]