Harrison Neighborhood - 1900 11 Existing Conditions 21

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Harrison Neighborhood - 1900 11 Existing Conditions 21 \, .-- -L~»~'--~-~ D-IA ' ' • '-T• - '- , . .. ~ ,:;~ '· .;i.:.:: ~--~ .._-~_- ~... ~~- ---- ;.;: •.=~'+- .. ~ - . _. · · '...;~:~ - " .suitability I feasibility study june 1992 . · ~ BENJAMIN HARRISON HOME •INDIANA UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR I NATIONAL PARK SERVICE DENVER SERVICE CENTER ' ,,, SUMMARY Located in Indianapolis, Indiana, the 1895~1901 appearance; the other would be Benjamin Harrison Home, owned by the developed with a visitor I administrative Arthur Jordan Foundation and operated center and parking. by the President Benjamin Harrison Foundation, offers historical and Alternative B: Joint Venture. Under this educational benefits to visitors. Since alternative the National Park Service operating this home for public benefit has would acquire the Harrison home and the 'brought an increasing financial burden on 2.1-acre grounds. The President Benjamin the. Arthur Jordan Foundation, the Harrison Foundation would manage the trustees of this group sought aid from site and retain ownership of the artwork, United States Representative Andrew furnishings, and library I archival material. Jacobs, Jr. and United States Senator As in alternative A, two land zones Richard G. Lugar for a National Park would be used, but administrative Service study of the property. functions would be located in the home's Consequently, the National Park Service basement. Development in the zone not initiated a suitability I feasibility study in historically owned by Benjamin Harrison February 1991. The national significance would include a visitor center and of the home was previously established parking. by its national historic landmark status. This study determined that this national Alternative C: Financialn'echnical historic landmark is suitable and feasible Assistance. In this alternative, ownership for inclusion in the national park system. and management of the home and grounds would be retained by the Arthur This final Suitability/Feasibility Study Jordan Foundation/President Benjamin presents four alternatives for ownership, Harrison Foundation, and there would be management, funding, development, and little development on the property. The interpretation of the property. The site National Park Service would provide boundary for each alternative is the 2.1 financial and technical assistance under a acres owned by the Arthur Jordan cooperative agreement. Foundation/President Benjamin Harrison Foundation. Alternative D: No Action. Under this alternative the status quo, or continuation Alternative A: National Park Service of existing conditions, would be retained. Owned and Operated. Under this There would be no NPS involvement. alternative the National Park Service would acquire and manage the Benjamin A brief analysis of impacts is also Harrison Home, its contents, and the 2.1 included following the alternatives section acres on which it is sited. The land would to aid decision makers in evaluating the be split into two zones-one, historically study alternatives. occupied by the Harrison home and grounds, would be restored to its iii CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 1 SUIT ABILITY /FEASIBILITY 3 Suitability 3 Feasibility 3 Compliance 4 Boundary 4 OVERVIEW /HISTORY 6 Benjamin Harrison 6 The Benjami~ Harrison Home 7 CURRENT CONDITIONS 12 Setting 12 Furnishings 13 Description of the Benjamin Harrison Home 14 Evaluation of the Home's Condition 15 Hazardous Materials 17 Site Development 17 Landscaping 18 .. SOCIOECONOMIC ENVIRONMENT 23 Population and Economics 23 Access and Transportation 23 Recreation, Visitor Use, and Visitor Services 24 Projections of Potential Use 24 INTERPRETIVE THEMES 26 Law 26 Political Life 26 Military Career 26 Reformer 26 The Harrison Family 26 History of the Harrison Home 27 ALTERNATIVES/MANAGEMENT 28 Existing Management 28 Alternative A: National Park Service Owned And Operated 28 Ownership/Management/Funding 28 Development 29 Interpretation 29 Alternative B: Joint Venture (See Appendix C) 30 Ownership/Management/Funding 30 Development 30 Interpretation 31 v .--- --- 1 ! Alternative C: Financial/Technical Assistance 31 Ownership/Management/Funding 31 Development 31 Interpretation 32 't' Alternative D: No Action 32 IMPACTS 33 General Impacts 33 Socioeconomic Impacts 33 Environmental Impacts 35 DEVELOPMENT AND OPERATING COSTS 38 ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED AND REJECTED 39 OTHER OWNERSHIP/MANAGEMENT CONSIDERATIONS 40 APPENDIXES A: Existing Plant Species 41 B: President Benjamin Harrison Foundation, Inc. Proposed Budget - 1991 42 C: Requests by the President Benjamin Harrison Foundation, Inc. 44 BIBLIOGRAPHY 48 PARTICIPANTS 50 MAPS Location 2 Historic Districts 5 Harrison Neighborhood - 1900 11 Existing Conditions 21 PHOTOGRAPHS/DRAWINGS Benjamin Harrison 6 The Harrison Home in the 1880s 9 The Harrison Home With Its Early 20th Century Porch 9 The Harrison Home in the 1980s 13 TABLES 1: Visitation, 1981-1990 24 2: Potential Demand - Recreation Visits, 1991-2000 25 3: Estimated Staff Requirements 28 4: Alternatives Summary 32 5: Environmental Effects 36 vi ··- ·- ·-- ---------------------------------· INTRODUCTION Benjamin Harrison resided in suitability and feasibility of NPS Indianapolis, Indiana, for most of his life. involvement with the property. The It was there that he married, raised his trustees had never intended to operate a · family, conducted a successful career as a presidential home. That situation evolved lawyer, pursued a political career, was from their ownership and use of the elected to the presidency, and is buried. Harrison home. The foundation's purpose For much of his life Harrison made his is to support community projects, home at 1230 North Delaware Street. In especially those related to music. The 1937 the Arthur Jordan Foundation trustees hoped the NPS study would purchased the property to serve as a result in a means to operate the.home girls' dormitory for the Jordan Music and relieve them of continued financial Consezvatory. The house now functions hardship. To continue the status quo will as a museum where many of the not relieve the financial burden of the Harrison furnishings are displayed. The home on the Arthur Jordan Foundation home also provides historical and and could threaten the house with educational benefits to visitors. diminished maintenance, closure to public visitation, or sale to a private party. This Operating the Harrison home for public study will determine the suitability and benefit has placed a financial burden on feasibility of making this property a part the Arthur Jordan Foundation. To of the national park system, and suggest alleviate this, the trustees of the Arthur ways in which the major home of Jordan Foundation approached U.S. President Benjamin Harrison can be Representative Andrew Jacobs, Jr. and preserved for public enjoyment in a U.S. Senator Richard G. Lugar, requesting manner befitting its significance. that a study be done to determine the 1 INDIANAPOLIS INDIANA 0 INDIANAPOLIS N 0 R T H LOCATION SCALE IN MILES Benjamin Harrison Home 0 2 Suitabilty/Feasibility Study f , Indianapolis, Indiana United States Department of the Interior National Park Service DSC • BEHA • 40,000 • JUNE 1991 ON MICROFILM · ···· -·- ·--- --·--·----------------------------- SUITABILITY/FEASIBILITY ... To qualify for addition to the national important public offices. A second park system, an area must first be building, ~ hunting and fishing retreat, nationally significant, and then meet was constructed on property located on criteria for suitability and feasibility. By Second Lake near the town of Old Forge, its status as a national historic landmark, New York, in the Adirondack Mountains. Benjamin Harrison Horne has been President Harrison occupied this structure determined to be nationally significant. for only brief periods in the summers between 1896 and 1900. This property is To be suitable for inclusion in the system, currently in private ownership. Harrison an area must represent a natural or and his first wife occupied two other cultural theme or type of recreational residences in Indianapolis, but these resource that is not already adequately houses have since been razed. represented in the national park system or is not comparably represented and The Benjamin Harrison Home at 1230 protected for public enjoyment by another North Delaware is the only site remaining land-managing entity. Adequacy of · that is both available for public use and representation is determined on a suitable for the interpretation of this case-by-case basis by comparing the ex-president. Benjamin Harrison is not proposed area to other units in the represented anywhere else in the national national park system for differences or park system, and the site is threatened by similarities in the character, quality, limited financial support. This could •. quantity, or combination of resources, and result in the closure of the facility, opportunity for public enjoyment. curtailment of its interpretive activities, or deterioration of the resources. The To be feasible as a new unit of the Harrison Home, therefore, meets the national park system, an area's natural suitability criteria for inclusion in the systems and/ or historic settings must be national park system. of sufficient size and appropriate configuration to ensure long-term FEASIBILITY protection of the resources and to accommodate public use. It must have Situated on 2.1 acres of ground, the potential for efficient administration at a Benjamin Harrison property is located at reasonable cost. Important feasibility the southwest edge
Recommended publications
  • Conservation and Management of Butternut Trees
    Purdue University Purdue extension FNR-421-W & Natural Re ry sou Forestry and Natural Resources st rc re e o s F Conservation and Management of Butternut Trees Lenny Farlee1,3, Keith Woeste1, Michael Ostry2, James McKenna1 and Sally Weeks3 1 USDA Forest Service Hardwood Tree Improvement and Regeneration Center, Purdue University, 715 W. State Street, West Lafayette, IN, 47907 PURDUE UNIVERSITY 2 USDA Forest Service Northern Research Station, 1561 Lindig Ave. St. Paul, MN 55108 3 Department of Forestry and Natural Resources, Purdue University, 715 W. State Street, West Lafayette, IN, 47907 Introduction Butternut (Juglans cinerea), also known as white wal- nut, is a native hardwood related to black walnut (Juglans nigra) and other members of the walnut family. Butternut is a medium-sized tree with alternate, pinnately com- pound leaves, that bears large, sharply ridged, cylindrical nuts inside sticky green hulls that earned it the nickname lemon-nut (Rink, 1990). The nuts, a preferred food of squirrels and other wildlife, were collected and eaten by Native Americans (Waugh, 1916; Hamel and Chiltoskey, 1975) and early settlers, who also valued butternut for its workable, medium brown-colored heartwood (Kel- logg, 1919), and as a source of medicine (Johnson, 1884; Lawrence, 1998), dyes (Hamel and Chiltoskey, 1975), and sap sugar. Butternut’s native range extends over the entire north- eastern quarter of the United States, including many states immediately west of the Mississippi River. Butter- nut is more cold-tolerant than black walnut, and it grows as far north as the Upper Peninsula of Michigan, New Brunswick, southern Quebec, and Ontario (Fig.1).
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation Assessment for Butternut Or White Walnut (Juglans Cinerea) L. USDA Forest Service, Eastern Region
    Conservation Assessment for Butternut or White walnut (Juglans cinerea) L. USDA Forest Service, Eastern Region 2003 Jan Schultz Hiawatha National Forest Forest Plant Ecologist (906) 228-8491 This Conservation Assessment was prepared to compile the published and unpublished information on Juglans cinerea L. (butternut). This is an administrative review of existing information only and does not represent a management decision or direction by the U. S. Forest Service. Though the best scientific information available was gathered and reported in preparation of this document, then subsequently reviewed by subject experts, it is expected that new information will arise. In the spirit of continuous learning and adaptive management, if the reader has information that will assist in conserving the subject taxon, please contact the Eastern Region of the Forest Service Threatened and Endangered Species Program at 310 Wisconsin Avenue, Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53203. Conservation Assessment for Butternut or White walnut (Juglans cinerea) L. 2 Table Of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .....................................................................................5 INTRODUCTION / OBJECTIVES.......................................................................7 BIOLOGICAL AND GEOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION..............................8 Species Description and Life History..........................................................................................8 SPECIES CHARACTERISTICS...........................................................................9
    [Show full text]
  • 2012 Platform Was Drafted After Soliciting Testimony from a Geographically Diverse Range of Hoosiers at Hearings in South Bend, New Albany and Indianapolis
    Preamble We've come a long way in a short time. With a focus and a commitment to serve Hoosier taxpayers, and not special interests, Indiana's Party of Purpose has enacted improvements that have made government smaller and more efficient, improved our state's economy, and ensured Indiana's Comeback continues to move full steam ahead. After years of government spending and debt, Republican leadership balanced the budget without raising taxes. At the same time, services have improved across the state. A leaner state government has actually improved quality. Our Bureau of Motor Vehicles is now a model for efficiency, moving customers through in 10 minutes or less. Major Moves has improved infrastructure by providing a decade worth of funding for projects around the state that had been promised and delayed for decades. Property taxes in Indiana are among the lowest in the nation, having been cut by 30 percent and capped permanently by the voters and by our State Constitution. Along the way, we have lived by a number of simple principles, but atop that list is the fact that Hoosiers know what's best for Hoosiers. We don't ask for, or want, the federal government to interfere with or dictate how we should live our lives. The improvements we have made, together, have come from within, from Hoosiers. We owe a debt of gratitude to Governor Mitch Daniels and Lieutenant Governor Becky Skillman , our dynamic Hoosier duo, who have worked and led to make Indiana a better place to live, work and invest, alongside House Speaker Brian Bosma , Senate President Pro Tempore David Long and our majorities in the House and Senate.
    [Show full text]
  • **** This Is an EXTERNAL Email. Exercise Caution. DO NOT Open Attachments Or Click Links from Unknown Senders Or Unexpected Email
    Scott.A.Milkey From: Hudson, MK <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, June 20, 2016 3:23 PM To: Powell, David N;Landis, Larry (llandis@ );candacebacker@ ;Miller, Daniel R;Cozad, Sara;McCaffrey, Steve;Moore, Kevin B;[email protected];Mason, Derrick;Creason, Steve;Light, Matt ([email protected]);Steuerwald, Greg;Trent Glass;Brady, Linda;Murtaugh, David;Seigel, Jane;Lanham, Julie (COA);Lemmon, Bruce;Spitzer, Mark;Cunningham, Chris;McCoy, Cindy;[email protected];Weber, Jennifer;Bauer, Jenny;Goodman, Michelle;Bergacs, Jamie;Hensley, Angie;Long, Chad;Haver, Diane;Thompson, Lisa;Williams, Dave;Chad Lewis;[email protected];Andrew Cullen;David, Steven;Knox, Sandy;Luce, Steve;Karns, Allison;Hill, John (GOV);Mimi Carter;Smith, Connie S;Hensley, Angie;Mains, Diane;Dolan, Kathryn Subject: Indiana EBDM - June 22, 2016 Meeting Agenda Attachments: June 22, 2016 Agenda.docx; Indiana Collaborates to Improve Its Justice System.docx **** This is an EXTERNAL email. Exercise caution. DO NOT open attachments or click links from unknown senders or unexpected email. **** Dear Indiana EBDM team members – A reminder that the Indiana EBDM Policy Team is scheduled to meet this Wednesday, June 22 from 9:00 am – 4:00 pm at IJC. At your earliest convenience, please let me know if you plan to attend the meeting. Attached is the meeting agenda. Please note that we have a full agenda as this is the team’s final Phase V meeting. We have much to discuss as we prepare the state’s application for Phase VI. We will serve box lunches at about noon so we can make the most of our time together.
    [Show full text]
  • Southeastern Ohio's Soldiers and Their Families During the Civil
    They Fought the War Together: Southeastern Ohio’s Soldiers and Their Families During the Civil War A Dissertation Submitted to Kent State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy by Gregory R. Jones December, 2013 Dissertation written by Gregory R. Jones B.A., Geneva College, 2005 M.A., Western Carolina University, 2007 Ph.D., Kent State University, 2013 Approved by Dr. Leonne M. Hudson, Chair, Doctoral Dissertation Committee Dr. Bradley Keefer, Doctoral Dissertation Committee Members Dr. John Jameson Dr. David Purcell Dr. Willie Harrell Accepted by Dr. Kenneth Bindas, Chair, Department of History Dr. Raymond A. Craig, Dean, College of Arts and Sciences ii Table of Contents Acknowledgements.............................................................................................................iv Introduction..........................................................................................................................7 Chapter 1: War Fever is On: The Fight to Define Patriotism............................................26 Chapter 2: “Wars and Rumors of War:” Southeastern Ohio’s Correspondence on Combat...............................................................................................................................60 Chapter 3: The “Thunderbolt” Strikes Southeastern Ohio: Hardships and Morgan’s Raid....................................................................................................................................95 Chapter 4: “Traitors at Home”:
    [Show full text]
  • LINCOLN and the COPPERHEADS in the CIVIL WAR in January 1863
    SNAKES LURKING IN THE GRASS: LINCOLN AND THE COPPERHEADS IN THE CIVIL WAR In January 1863, Abraham Lincoln was confronted with a threat more dangerous than that of the Confederate Army. The Union Army was visibly struggling toward victory with each passing battle and it seemed as if the war was far from concluding. Lincoln’s problems were not just limited to the battlefield, but the president was also burdened in dealing with intense opposition toward his government on the homefront. The threat was the Copperhead movement: Congressional Democrats were banning together in opposition to the war and proposing immediate peace through negotiations with the Confederacy. The Copperhead challenge came at an uneasy period in Lincoln’s presidency as the American public became more hostile towards the war effort. Numerous setbacks for the Union troops and the hardships of the war at home wore at the patience of many Americans and the President himself. The Copperheads took advantage of the public agitation by attacking Lincoln’s actions and character while deeming his expansion of power as unconstitutional and dangerous. Lincoln’s suspension of habeas corpus and use of martial law agitated this political opposition. The Copperheads were successful in gaining support before the election of 1864 through their attacks on Lincoln’s perceived abuse of civil liberties and expansion of power; however, Lincoln’s ability to lead the nation in troubling times, as well as a turn in the tide of the war, prevented the election of a Copperhead president and exposed the weaknesses of the movement. The supporters of the Copperhead movement were quite varied and diverse.
    [Show full text]
  • TO: Republicans Interested in Being National Convention Delegates CC: State Committee Members & County Chairmen FROM: Kyle Hupfer, IRSC Chairman
    TO: Republicans Interested in Being National Convention Delegates CC: State Committee Members & County Chairmen FROM: Kyle Hupfer, IRSC Chairman RE: National Convention Delegate, Alternate Delegate and Presidential Elector Information The Republican National Convention will be held August 23-27, 2020 in Charlotte, North Carolina. The Republican Party will nominate a President and Vice President candidate to the General Election ticket at the National Convention. The Indiana Delegation will consist of 27 District Delegates, 27 District Alternate Delegates, 28 At-Large Delegates and 28 At-Large Alternate Delegates. At the same time Delegates and Alternate Delegates are chosen, Presidential Electors will also be selected. Included in this informational packet are two forms. The first covers all At Large Positions (Delegate, Alternate Delegate, Elector, Alternate Elector). The second covers all District Positions (Delegate, Alternate Delegate, Elector, Alternate Elector). To increase your chances at being selected, you are able to complete both forms and run for multiple positions. These forms must be mailed no later than April 24, 2020 at 5:00pm ET as described below: At-Large Delegate, At-Large Alternate Delegate and At-Large Elector Forms must be mailed to the Indiana Republican Party at 101 W. Ohio St., Suite 2200, Indianapolis, IN 46204 (send to Attn: Danielle Zagone). District Delegate, District Alternate Delegate and District Elector Forms must be mailed to the Republican District Chair of the Congressional District in which the candidate is running. Contact information for Republican District Chairs can be found at www.indiana.gop. District Delegates, Alternate Delegates and Electors will be selected on May 9, 2020 at District Caucuses and At-Large Delegates, Alternate Delegates and Electors will be selected on May 20, 2020 at a State Committee meeting.
    [Show full text]
  • Tremblers in GOP's Tectonic Plates
    V19, N25 Thursday March 6, 2014 Tremblers in GOP’s tectonic plates Bosma, Kittle story, family groups lashing out shows a GOP on edge By BRIAN A. HOWEY INDIANAPOLIS – With the Indiana Republican Party at its power apex, the inevitable fissures are beginning to appear as economic and social conserva- tives are clashing. Nothing revealed this more than the constitutional mar- riage amendment where more than a dozen senators and repre- sentatives broke away, supporting the vote from this November to possibly the stripping out of the second 2016 when Gov. Mike Pence is expected sentence. On the Indiana Repub- to seek reelection, the last two weeks lican Central Committee, a clear have found social conservatives lashing majority said to be around 15 of out at the GOP legislative establishment. the 21 members opposed HJR-3. Former Republican Jim Kittle (left) and And in the fallout of the Continued on page 4 second sentence, which delayed Speaker Brian Bosma. Putin’s Russia, Crimea By BRIAN A. HOWEY INDIANAPOLIS – As day slipped into night during the cruel winter of 2014, millions of Americans watched the mesmerizing closing ceremony of the Sochi Olympics. This was a stunning facade of the Russian Fed- eration, particularly its tribute “He made an inexcusable to writers, with their portraits rising up from the floor - Leo mistake, he did. He went to a Tolstoy, Anton Chekov, Fyodor debate - if he’d just gotten a flat Dostoevsky, and, amazingly, Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, the tire, he’d be a senator today.” author who revealed the epic - Club for Growth’s Chris cruelty of gulags of the Soviet Stalin era.
    [Show full text]
  • Butternut Canker and Thousand Cankers Disease
    United States Department of Agriculture US FOREST SERVICE NORTHERN RESEARCH STATION Research Review Two Fungal Diseases Spreading and Endangering Walnut Species: Butternut Canker and Thousand Cankers Disease Invasive fungal diseases and insects are assaulting hardwood tree species in our eastern forests. Although the insects receive more attention (they are more visible after all), scientists, foresters, and environmentalists are concerned that invasive fungi are endangering many hardwoods, with fungus-caused canker diseases the most destructive. Trees that produce mast—beechnuts, butternuts, walnuts, and acorns, which are food sources for many animals—are especially at risk. The most tragic example is the American chestnut, once the “queen of the eastern forests,” which has essentially been extirpated in the wild in its native range because of the canker disease chestnut blight. Cankers are localized areas of fungal infection of tree bark and cambium on branches and stems. Numerous infections and subsequent coalescing of cankers will kill trees. Butternut canker and thousand cankers disease of black walnut are cankers affecting eastern hardwoods. Since its discovery in 1967, butternut canker has established itself throughout the native range of butternut in the East, killing up to 90% of the trees in some states. Since 1990, Northern Research Station (NRS) scientists have focused their attention on conservation of butternut and the search for disease resistance in this species. The discovery of thousand cankers disease (TCD) in Colorado in 2007 and its subsequent discovery in the eastern United States have led to predictions of disastrous losses of eastern black walnut trees. NRS scientists and university colleagues are investigating how the insect-pathogen complex causing this disease may build and spread within the East and assessing what resistance exists in black walnut to both the pathogen and the insect pest.
    [Show full text]
  • Why the People Are So Damn Angry New Economic Realities Putting the ‘American Dream’ out of Reach of the Middle Class by BRIAN A
    V21, 39 Thursday, June 9, 2016 Why the people are so damn angry New economic realities putting the ‘American Dream’ out of reach of the middle class By BRIAN A. HOWEY MICHIGAN CITY, Ind. – Ameri- cans and Hoosiers are angry. They are seeking political retribution. They are finding Republican presidential nomi- nee Donald Trump as the answer. But the critical question that has remained largely unanswered is why? Why are We the People so pissed off? Appearing at two events in Angry Donald Trump supporters confront U.S. Sen. Ted Cruz in Marion on the eve of the Elkhart last week, President Barack Indiana primary on May 2 Obama laid out the template for the doesn’t always yield the wisest decision making. sizzling anger that is fueling one of the most unpredict- At the Lerner Theater in Elkhart, PBS moderator able political climates in modern times. And Prof. Robert J. Gwen Ifill listened as Obama made what Howey Politics In- Gordon of Northwestern University, a macroeconomist and diana called an “economic victory lap,” where the president economic historian, supplies an array of data that helps reminded the Republican-dominated county that the 20% understand why the political decisions of 2016 are almost Continued on page 4 certainly being framed in the context of an emotion which Party of Lincoln stained By BRIAN A. HOWEY INDIANAPOLIS – On May 17, 1860, the Repub- lican convention campaign team of native son Abraham Lincoln met with the Indiana and Pennsylvania delega- tions in Chicago. What emerged hours later was that the Hoosier delegation would vote “Oh, look at my African-Ameri- as a solid bloc for the president who would go on to become the can over here.
    [Show full text]
  • RULES of the INDIANA REPUBLICAN STATE COMMITTEE PREAMBLE to Further the Rights of Its Members to Freely Associate to Achieve
    This revision contains all changes approved as of March 2, 2016 RULES OF THE INDIANA REPUBLICAN STATE COMMITTEE PREAMBLE To further the rights of its members to freely associate to achieve the goals of the Party, the Indiana Republican Party State Committee adopts the following rules for the organization and government of the Republican Party of the State of Indiana: CHAPTER I: GENERAL PROVISIONS Rule 1-1. Subject to the Republican Party of the State of Indiana in the State Convention duly assembled, the State Committee is the supreme party authority in this state, and a permanent political body, continuous from year to year. This committee has full power to adopt all necessary rules for the government and regulation of party affairs. The State Committee shall be organized at the time and in the manner provided for elsewhere in these rules. Rule 1-2. If there is a conflict between these rules and a statute, the statute prevails. Rule 1-3. (a) These rules may be amended by a majority vote at any regular meeting of the State Committee, except for rules concerning the State Convention, which must be amended in compliance with Rule 9-47. (b) The Secretary of the State Committee shall mail an exact copy of any proposed amendment to each member of the Rules Committee. The Rules Committee shall review the proposed amendment and submit a recommendation concerning the proposed amendment to the State Committee. (c) The Secretary of the State Committee shall mail an exact copy of any proposed amendment, with a copy of the Rules Committee recommendation, to each member of the State Committee at least ten (10) days before the meeting at which the amendment is to be considered.
    [Show full text]
  • TREES of OHIO Field Guide DIVISION of WILDLIFE This Booklet Is Produced by the ODNR Division of Wildlife As a Free Publication
    TREES OF OHIO field guide DIVISION OF WILDLIFE This booklet is produced by the ODNR Division of Wildlife as a free publication. This booklet is not for resale. Any unauthorized reproduction is pro- hibited. All images within this booklet are copyrighted by the ODNR Division of Wildlife and its contributing artists and photographers. For additional INTRODUCTION information, please call 1-800-WILDLIFE (1-800-945-3543). Forests in Ohio are diverse, with 99 different tree spe- cies documented. This field guide covers 69 of the species you are most likely to encounter across the HOW TO USE THIS BOOKLET state. We hope that this guide will help you appre- ciate this incredible part of Ohio’s natural resources. Family name Common name Scientific name Trees are a magnificent living resource. They provide DECIDUOUS FAMILY BEECH shade, beauty, clean air and water, good soil, as well MERICAN BEECH A Fagus grandifolia as shelter and food for wildlife. They also provide us with products we use every day, from firewood, lum- ber, and paper, to food items such as walnuts and maple syrup. The forest products industry generates $26.3 billion in economic activity in Ohio; however, trees contribute to much more than our economic well-being. Known for its spreading canopy and distinctive smooth LEAF: Alternate and simple with coarse serrations on FRUIT OR SEED: Fruits are composed of an outer prickly bark, American beech is a slow-growing tree found their slightly undulating margins, 2-4 inches long. Fall husk that splits open in late summer and early autumn throughout the state.
    [Show full text]