Lawrence to Bryn Mawr Project Brochure
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Planners Guide to Chicago 2013
Planners Guide to Chicago 2013 2013 Lake Baha’i Glenview 41 Wilmette Temple Central Old 14 45 Orchard Northwestern 294 Waukegan Golf Univ 58 Milwaukee Sheridan Golf Morton Mill Grove 32 C O N T E N T S Dempster Skokie Dempster Evanston Des Main 2 Getting Around Plaines Asbury Skokie Oakton Northwest Hwy 4 Near the Hotels 94 90 Ridge Crawford 6 Loop Walking Tour Allstate McCormick Touhy Arena Lincolnwood 41 Town Center Pratt Park Lincoln 14 Chinatown Ridge Loyola Devon Univ 16 Hyde Park Peterson 14 20 Lincoln Square Bryn Mawr Northeastern O’Hare 171 Illinois Univ Clark 22 Old Town International Foster 32 Airport North Park Univ Harwood Lawrence 32 Ashland 24 Pilsen Heights 20 32 41 Norridge Montrose 26 Printers Row Irving Park Bensenville 32 Lake Shore Dr 28 UIC and Taylor St Addison Western Forest Preserve 32 Wrigley Field 30 Wicker Park–Bucktown Cumberland Harlem Narragansett Central Cicero Oak Park Austin Laramie Belmont Elston Clybourn Grand 43 Broadway Diversey Pulaski 32 Other Places to Explore Franklin Grand Fullerton 3032 DePaul Park Milwaukee Univ Lincoln 36 Chicago Planning Armitage Park Zoo Timeline Kedzie 32 North 64 California 22 Maywood Grand 44 Conference Sponsors Lake 50 30 Park Division 3032 Water Elmhurst Halsted Tower Oak Chicago Damen Place 32 Park Navy Butterfield Lake 4 Pier 1st Madison United Center 6 290 56 Illinois 26 Roosevelt Medical Hines VA District 28 Soldier Medical Ogden Field Center Cicero 32 Cermak 24 Michigan McCormick 88 14 Berwyn Place 45 31st Central Park 32 Riverside Illinois Brookfield Archer 35th -
Tax Increment Financing (TIF) District Programming 2019-2023 105TH
Tax Increment Financing (TIF) District Programming 2019-2023 Working Copy 105TH/VINCENNES T-111 Ends on 12/31/2025 Fund / Project Balances 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Total Fund Balance 1. FY 2018 Year End Available Fund Balance $2,307,500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,307,500 Subtotal $2,307,500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,307,500 Net Revenue $2,307,500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,307,500 Revenue 1. Property tax $0 $929,900 $929,900 $929,900 $1,013,200 $1,013,200 $4,816,100 Subtotal $0 $929,900 $929,900 $929,900 $1,013,200 $1,013,200 $4,816,100 Net Revenue $2,307,500 $929,900 $929,900 $929,900 $1,013,200 $1,013,200 $7,123,600 Transfers Between TIF Districts 1. From 119th/I-57 (RDA - Renaissance Beverly Ridge) $0 $706,800 $353,400 $353,400$353,400 $353,400 $2,120,400 Subtotal $0 $706,800 $353,400 $353,400 $353,400 $353,400 $2,120,400 Net Revenue $2,307,500 $1,636,700 $1,283,300 $1,283,300 $1,366,600 $1,366,600 $9,244,000 Current Obligations 1. Program administration $0 ($21,800) ($22,500) ($23,400)($28,500) ($33,700) ($129,900) 2. RDA - Renaissance Beverly Ridge ($1,039,200) ($1,586,800) ($1,043,400) ($1,043,400)($1,043,400) ($1,043,400) ($6,799,600) 3. Residential St Resurfacing - Ward 34 ($43,200) $0 $0 $0$0 $0 ($43,200) 4. Lighting - arterial - West Pullman ($41,000) $0 $0 $0$0 $0 ($41,000) Subtotal ($1,123,400) ($1,608,600) ($1,065,900) ($1,066,800) ($1,071,900) ($1,077,100) ($7,013,700) Net Revenue $1,184,100 $28,100 $217,400 $216,500 $294,700 $289,500 $2,230,300 Proposed Projects 1. -
Lawrence to Bryn Mawr Modernization Project: Start of Stage a Construction
Lawrence to Bryn Mawr Modernization Project: Start of Stage A Construction Town Hall audience questions from March 2&4, 2021* meetings General questions Q. What does this project cost and how is it funded? A. The $2.1 billion RPM Phase One project is funded through a combination of federal and local funds including: $957 in federal Core Capacity funds (FTA); a federal $125 million Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement (CMAQ) grant from the Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning (CMAP); $622 million in Transit TIF (tax-increment financing) funds from the City of Chicago; and CTA financing. Q. Are updates and notices available in languages other than English? A. Yes. We regularly provide subtitled recordings of past community meetings in Chinese, Spanish and Vietnamese, as well as translated flyers distributed to local community organizations. Additionally, we offer live translation services for public meetings upon request. Q. When will the block-by-block meetings happen? A. They will be scheduled for April 2021. We will notify the public when the dates are finalized. Q. When will the project start? A. Stage A construction is expected to begin Spring 2021. Once construction schedules are finalized, we will notify the public in advance of important construction start dates. Station design/station and track construction Q. Why won’t you have temporary stations at Lawrence and Berwyn? A. There is not enough space available to build temporary stations at those locations, unfortunately. Passengers who normally board at Lawrence can use Wilson or Argyle stations, which are each a quarter mile away and connected via the #36 Broadway bus, and Berwyn customers can use the Bryn Mawr or Argyle stations. -
Lawrence to Bryn Mawr Modernization Project Area
TRANSIT-ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT PLAN PRESENTATION LAWRENCE TO BRYN MAWR MODERNIZATION PROJECT AREA Purpose • Create a community-led vision for redevelopment in the neighborhood • Test specific concepts for CTA owned parcels • Expedite development post-construction Timing • Outgrowth of the community engagement process that began in 2009 • Planning Grant award from Federal Transit Administration • Coordination between transit project and development sites Transit-Oriented Development Plan Lawrence To Bryn Mawr Modernization Area Community Engagement 12 month process 22 stakeholder meetings including 3 open house meetings: • May 2017 – idea gathering • November 2017 – vision & goals; initial ideas • May 2018 – review of recommendations; next steps Aldermanic dialogue Website updates Transit-Oriented Development Plan Lawrence To Bryn Mawr Modernization Area TOD Planning Process TODAY Discovery Visioning Development Recommendations Implementation 2018 2020’s • Existing • Engagement • Concept • Public meeting • Select Conditions development developers • Vision • Final report • Market • Market testing • Zoning / Analysis • Principles and public review Goals • Engagement • Transit project • Construction coordination • Concept refinement • Aldermanic reviews Transit-Oriented Development Plan Lawrence To Bryn Mawr Modernization Area A Multi-Modal District Pedestrians • Enhanced pedestrian environment • Widened sidewalk on Hollywood Boulevard Transit • CTA Bryn Mawr, Berwyn, Argyle, and Lawrence stations • Increased transit service • #36, #81, #84, -
Lawrence to Bryn Mawr Modernization Station-By-Station Meeting FAQ from May 3-6, 2021
Lawrence to Bryn Mawr Modernization Station-by-Station Meeting FAQ from May 3-6, 2021 The CTA held station-by-station meetings to provide the public with an update of upcoming construction activities for the Lawrence to Bryn Mawr Modernization Project, which is a part of the Red and Purple Modernization (RPM) Phase One project. Below is a summary of the questions and answers discussed in each of the meetings. Bryn Mawr station Q. How long will Bryn Mawr station be under construction and will it be closed at any point? A. The Bryn Mawr station will close on May 16, 2021, but you will still be able to access the Red Line from the new Bryn Mawr temporary station entrances. During Stage A construction (2021-late 2022), there will be a separate entrance for Howard, or northbound, service located on Bryn Mawr. 95th-bound, or southbound, service will use the entrance on Broadway. During Stage B (late 2022- 2024), there will be southbound-only access via a temporary entrance on Bryn Mawr. The new station will open by the end of 2024. Q. When will the temporary station open and will the temporary stations be ADA accessible? The temporary station will open May 16, 2021. It will not be ADA accessible but the new permanent station, opening in 2024, will have both elevator and escalator access. Q. Given the tracks are expanding and getting wider, are there plans for some type of sound barrier? A. Yes, the new track structure will have noise barriers. Q. Is construction working from north to south? A. -
PDF of December 1981 Issue
THROWI WINKING Suggestion Receivers will visit your work location to • pass out "WINNING PASS" suggestion blanks • answer any question you might have • receive your "WINNING PASS" suggestions. Deadline for a ·'WINNING PASS" Watch for them during the week of December 13, 1981 DECEMBER 21, 1981 Employees encouraged to throw a winning pass When Brian Baschnagel caught the pass that gave the Chicago Bears a 10-9 win over the Minnesota Vikings at Soldier Field December 6, he probably never thought his feat would lead to a drive to save money at CT A. But it was Baschnagel's performance in the face of adver- sity that inspired the theme of a special suggestion program calling upon all employees to offer ideas about where addi- tional savings might be realized at CTA. The program was named "Winning Pass." The push for an intensive, comprehensive suggestion At 69th Street garage, Tony Borcic (right), training assistant I, program came during a budget presentation shortly before Training/Development Programs, finds an attentive listener in bus operator James Mayes, who was one of 20 flnallsts in last year's the Bears' game against the Vikings, when ways to cut costs eTA Bus Roadeo contest. were being discussed. It fell upon Human Resources Manager Fred King to develop the crash program aimed at economically." It was anticipated that adopted suggestions sounding out employees for their help in the current would not only save the Authority money, but would economic squeeze. "please passengers and reward employees." "Our feeling was that there were individuals close to the Reaction to the program was generally favorable, and action who see things in their daily jobs that others might 271 suggestions were submitted. -
2014 Budget Recommendations
MODERNIZING TRANSIT FOR THE FUTURE PRESIDENT’S 2014 BUDGET RECOMMENDATIONS (THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK) CTA FY14 Budget Table of Contents Letter from the President ........................................................................................................................................ 1 CTA Organizational Chart ........................................................................................................................................ 5 Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................................... 7 2013 Operating Budget Performance 2012 Operating Budget Performance Summary ........................................................................................ 25 2012 Operating Budget Schedule ..................................................................................................................... 34 President’s 2014 Proposed Operating Budget President’s 2013 Proposed Operating Budget Summary ....................................................................... 35 President’s 2013 Proposed Operating Budget Schedule ......................................................................... 42 President’s 2015-2016 Proposed Operating Financial Plan President’s 2015-2016 Proposed Operating Financial Plan Summary ............................................. 43 President’s 2015-2016 Proposed Operating Financial Plan Schedule .............................................. 47 2014-2018 Capital -
Findings of Fact and Conclusions Southwest Light Rail Transit May 15, 2018
METRO Green Line LRT Extension (SWLRT) Findings of Fact and Conclusions Southwest Light Rail Transit May 15, 2018 Prepared by the Metropolitan Council This page intentionally blank. Contents 1 Administrative Background and Statement of Issue ..................................................................................................... 1 2 Findings of Fact ............................................................................................................................................................................. 2 2.1 Project Description ............................................................................................................................................................ 2 2.2 Corrections to the Supplemental EA or Changes in the Project since the Supplemental EA was Published .............................................................................................................................................................................................. 4 2.3 Decision Regarding Need for Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement ...................................... 5 2.3.1 Type, Extent, and Reversibility of Environmental Effects ....................................................................... 5 2.3.2 Cumulative Potential Effects of Related or Anticipated Future Projects ......................................... 11 2.3.3 Extent to Which the Environmental Effects are Subject to Mitigation by Ongoing Public Regulatory Authority ............................................................................................................................................................... -
An Integrated Approach to Climate Adaptation at the Chicago Transit Authority
An Integrated Approach to Climate Adaptation at the Chicago Transit Authority AUGUST 2013 FTA Report No. 0070 Federal Transit Administration PREPARED BY Chicago Transit Authority TranSystems COVER PHOTO Courtesy of AAA Engineering DISCLAIMER This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the U.S. Department of Transportation in the interest of information exchange. The United States Government assumes no liability for its contents or use thereof. The United States Government does not endorse products of manufacturers. Trade or manufacturers’ names appear herein solely because they are considered essential to the objective of this report. An Integrated Approach to Climate Adaptation at the Chicago Transit Authority AUGUST 2013 FTA Report No. 0070 PREPARED BY Chicago Transit Authority TranSystems SPONSORED BY Federal Transit Administration Office of Research, Demonstration and Innovation U.S. Department of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590 AVAILABLE ONLINE http://www.fta.dot.gov/research Metric Conversion Table SYMBOL WHEN YOU KNOW MULTIPLY BY TO FIND SYMBOL LENGTH in inches 25.4 millimeters mm ft feet 0.305 meters m yd yards 0.914 meters m mi miles 1.61 kilometers km VOLUME fl oz fluid ounces 29.57 milliliters mL gal gallons 3.785 liter L ft3 cubic feet 0.028 cubic meters m3 yd3 cubic yards 0.765 cubic meters m3 NOTE: volumes greater than 1000 L shall be shown in m3 MASS oz ounces 28.35 grams g lb pounds 0.454 kilograms kg megagrams T short tons (2000 lb) 0.907 Mg (or “t”) (or “metric ton”) TEMPERATURE (exact degrees) o 5 (F-32)/9 o F Fahrenheit Celsius C or (F-32)/1.8 FEDERAL TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION ii REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE Form Approved OMB No. -
Tax Increment Financing (TIF) District Programming 2017-2021 105TH
Tax Increment Financing (TIF) District Programming 2017-2021 Working Copy 105TH/VINCENNES T-111 Ends on 12/31/2025 Fund / Project Balances 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total Fund Balance 1. FY'16 year-end balance $1,022,200 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,022,200 2. Accrued liabilities $2,600 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,600 3. Revenue recognition adjustment ($193,400) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 ($193,400) Subtotal $831,400 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $831,400 Net Revenue $831,400 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $831,400 Revenue 1. Property tax $0 $1,172,400 $1,172,400 $1,396,900 $1,396,900 $1,396,900 $6,535,500 Subtotal $0 $1,172,400 $1,172,400 $1,396,900 $1,396,900 $1,396,900 $6,535,500 Net Revenue $831,400 $1,172,400 $1,172,400 $1,396,900 $1,396,900 $1,396,900 $7,366,900 Transfers Between TIF Districts 1. From 119th/I-57 (RA - Renaissance Beverly Ridge) $0 $706,800 $353,400 $353,400 $353,400 $353,400 $2,120,400 Subtotal $0 $706,800 $353,400 $353,400 $353,400 $353,400 $2,120,400 Net Revenue $831,400 $1,879,200 $1,525,800 $1,750,300 $1,750,300 $1,750,300 $9,487,300 Current Obligations 1. Program administration $0 ($24,000) ($27,400) ($28,200) ($29,500) ($36,800) ($145,900) 2. RA - Renaissance Beverly Ridge $0 ($1,200,000) ($876,500) ($887,000) ($897,600) ($908,500) ($4,769,600) 3. -
Intent to Prepare an Environmental
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 1 / Monday, January 3, 2011 / Notices 207 the SPR funds apportioned annually CTA operates the rapid transit system in a.m. at CTA Headquarters, in must be used for research, development, Cook County, Illinois. The proposed Conference Room 2A, 567 W. Lake and technology transfer activities. In project, described more completely Street, Chicago, IL 60661. accordance with government-wide grant within, would bring the North Red and Representatives of Native American management procedures, a grant Purple lines up to a state of good repair Tribal governments and Federal, State, application must be submitted for these from the track structure immediately regional, and local agencies that may funds. In addition, recipients must north of Belmont Station in Chicago, have an interest in any aspect of the submit periodic progress and financial Illinois to the Linden terminal in project will be invited to be reports. In lieu of Standard Form 424, Wilmette, Illinois. The purpose of this participating or cooperating agencies, as Application for Federal Assistance, the Notice of Intent is to (1) alert interested appropriate. FHWA uses a work program as the grant parties regarding the intent to prepare ADDRESSES: Comments will be accepted application. The information contained the EIS, (2) to provide information on at the public scoping meetings or they in the work program includes task the nature of the proposed project and may be sent to Mr. Steve Hands, descriptions, assignments of possible alternatives, and (3) to invite Strategic Planning and Policy, Chicago responsibility for conducting the work public participation in the EIS process. -
Oct 30Th – Nov 2Nd
OCT 30TH – NOV 2ND Welcome to the 6th Annual NACTO Designing Cities Conference! NACTO is a space for us to collaborate with peers, celebrate successes, and commiserate about challenges. Without question, this October, this space is more important than ever. The landscape we face in 2017 demands the clear-eyed vision and grounded pragmatism that distinguishes NACTO cities. We have major headwinds and opportunities ahead of us: from autonomous vehicle design and regulation to a soaring number of national traffic fatalities – 37,461 people killed in 2016 – that continue to serve as a sobering reminder of the urgency of our work. We know from experience the power of our shared strength. We’re all here together in Chicago because we care deeply about safe streets, about vibrant public space, and about equitable and sustainable cities. And the work that we’re all doing to make public spaces welcoming and streets accessible to everyone – in cities across the country and world – is beyond measure. From Atlanta to Nashville to Pittsburgh, cities are investing in reliable transit and sustainable transportation, recognizing that physical mobility determines economic and social mobility, and well-designed streets comprise the social fabric of urban places. Streets are important, and not just to us. This past year, we’ve been reminded anew of the fundamental importance of streets as places of public discourse and civic engagement. From the 4 million people who joined the Women’s March in cities from DC to Denver to Detroit, to the thousands of people participating in CicLAvia in a demonstration of community and joy in my own town of Los Angeles – streets play a central role in our cities.