Motor Neuron Columnar Fate Imposed by Sequential Phases of Hox-C Activity
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
articles Motor neuron columnar fate imposed by sequential phases of Hox-c activity Jeremy S. Dasen1, Jeh-Ping Liu2 & Thomas M. Jessell1 1Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biophysics, Center for Neurobiology and Behavior, Columbia University, 701 West 168th Street, New York, New York 10032, USA 2University of Virginia School of Medicine, Department of Neuroscience, Lane Road extended, MR4, Room 5032, Charlottesville, Virginia 22908, USA ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................... The organization of neurons into columns is a prominent feature of central nervous system structure and function. In many regions of the central nervous system the grouping of neurons into columns links cell-body position to axonal trajectory, thus contributing to the establishment of topographic neural maps. This link is prominent in the developing spinal cord, where columnar sets of motor neurons innervate distinct targets in the periphery. We show here that sequential phases of Hox-c protein expression and activity control the columnar differentiation of spinal motor neurons. Hox expression in neural progenitors is established by graded fibroblast growth factor signalling and translated into a distinct motor neuron Hox pattern. Motor neuron columnar fate then emerges through cell autonomous repressor and activator functions of Hox proteins. Hox proteins also direct the expression of genes that establish motor topographic projections, thus implicating Hox proteins as critical determinants of spinal motor neuron identity and organization. Columns are basic units of neuronal organization in the vertebrate neural Hox protein expression, and the establishment of spinal MN central nervous system (CNS)1,2, but the mechanisms that control columnar identity, if any, remains obscure. their assembly remain unclear. One region of the CNS in which neuronal columnar organization has been studied intensively is the Hox protein expression segregates with MN columnar subtype spinal cord, where distinct columnar subtypes of motor neurons are To explore the link between Hox expression and MN columnar known to innervate different muscle and neuronal targets in the 3 identity, we focused initially on Hox-c proteins, because members periphery . All spinal motor neurons (MNs) derive from progenitor 11 4 of this Hox cluster are prominently expressed by MNs .We cells located at a constant dorso-ventral position in the neural tube , examined how the expression of Hoxc5, Hoxc6, Hoxc8 and but motor neurons appear to acquire their discrete columnar Hoxc9 at brachial and thoracic levels of the spinal cord is matched identities as a function of position along the rostrocaudal axis of to the differentiation of LMC and CT neurons5,16. 5–8 the spinal cord (Supplementary Fig. S1a–c). Limb levels of the Hoxc6 expression by MNs (defined by Isl1/2 expression) was spinal cord generate lateral motor column (LMC) neurons, whereas confined to brachial levels, whereas Hoxc9 expression by MNs was intervening thoracic levels give rise to autonomic MNs (termed restricted to thoracic levels (Fig. 1a). Hoxc6þ and Hoxc9þ MNs were 5–8 Column of Terni (CT) neurons in chick) . Along the dorsoventral interspersed at the border of the brachial and thoracic spinal cord, but axis, the graded signalling activity of Sonic hedgehog (Shh) deter- very few neurons expressed both proteins (Fig. 1a, g). The rostro- mines the position of MN generation by regulating the spatial caudal domains of expression of Hoxc5 and Hoxc8 by MNs were also expression of a set of homeodomain transcription factors within segregated (Fig. 1b, h), but in contrast to Hoxc6 and Hoxc9, the 4,9 neural progenitors . The constancy of Shh signalling along the transition from Hoxc5þ to Hoxc8þ MNs mapped to the mid-brachial rostrocaudal axis, however, implies that other signalling pathways level (Fig. 1c; Supplementary Fig. S2c). Thus, rostral brachial LMC control the diversification of MNs into distinct columnar subtypes. neurons co-express Hoxc5 and Hoxc6, whereas caudal brachial LMC One source of signals that can influence the columnar fate of neurons co-express Hoxc6 and Hoxc8 (Fig. 1c, e, f, i, k). At rostral spinal motor neurons is the paraxial mesoderm. The transposition thoracic levels, many MNs initially co-expressed Hoxc8 and Hoxc9 of paraxial mesoderm between limb and thoracic levels soon after (Fig. 1d, j). neural tube closure results in the respecification of LMC and CT MN columnar subtypes located at different rostrocaudal posi- identity, and a similar switch in columnar fates is observed after tions can be delineated by LIM homeodomain transcription factor transposition of the neural tube10. However, before neural tube expression17. In addition, CT neurons can be distinguished by closure, signals from axial mesodermal tissues—the node and expression of BMP5, a transforming growth factor-b family mem- nascent notochord—have been shown to regulate the molecular ber18, and LMC neurons by expression of retinaldehyde dehydro- identity of MNs along the rostrocaudal axis of the spinal cord11.In genase-2 (RALDH2), a key enzyme in retinoic acid synthesis19,20 particular, members of the Hox-c homeodomain protein cluster are (Supplementary Fig. S1d). We therefore examined whether the expressed by post-mitotic MNs generated at distinct rostrocaudal profile of Hox-c protein expression by MNs corresponds to the positions11, and profiles of Hox-c protein expression characteristic position of newly generated brachial LMC neurons and of CT of brachial, thoracic and lumbar MNs can be induced in vitro by neurons. At brachial levels, the rostral and caudal boundaries of early exposure of neural cells to increasing levels of fibroblast growth RALDH2 expression coincided closely with the domain of Hoxc6þ, factor (FGF) signalling11,12. Moreover, the pattern of Hox-c protein Hoxc92 MNs (Fig. 1l, m, o; Supplementary Fig. S2a, b). At thoracic expression changes along with columnar identity after early trans- levels, the rostral and caudal boundaries of BMP5 expression position of brachial and thoracic neural tube10.Hoxproteins coincided with the domain of Hoxc9þ,Hoxc62 MNs (Fig. 1n–p; influence MN diversification in the hindbrain13–15, and thus a role Supplementary Fig. S2d, e). Together, these data indicate that Hoxc6 for Hox proteins in the assignment of spinal MN columnar identity and Hoxc9 expression within MNs coincides with brachial LMC is plausible. Nevertheless, the link between axial FGF signalling, and thoracic CT columns, respectively (Fig. 1q). 926 © 2003 Nature Publishing Group NATURE | VOL 425 | 30 OCTOBER 2003 | www.nature.com/nature articles Regulation of Hox-c protein expression by FGF signalling neural tube influences MN columnar identity. Brachial expression þ The exposure of neural progenitor cells in vitro to increasing FGF of FGF8 did not suppress the generation of Isl1/2 MNs, but levels induces the differentiation of MNs with a progressively more reduced the total MN number by ,30% at stage 29 (Fig. 2i, j), a caudal Hox-c profile, suggesting a model in which the positional finding consistent with observations that the number of MNs identity of MNs at brachial and thoracic levels is established by generated at brachial levels of the spinal cord normally exceeds graded FGF signalling11. that at thoracic levels20. The number of medial MMC neurons, To test this model in vivo, we examined whether an increase in the assessed by Lim3 expression17 was not altered (Supplementary Fig. level of FGF signalling in the neural tube elicits a rostral to caudal S3i), consistent with the presence of this motor column at both switch in the profile of Hox-c protein expression. In ovo electro- brachial and thoracic levels. poration was used to co-express FGF8 and the green fluorescent After FGF8 expression, however, brachial MNs lacked RALDH2 protein gene GFP (as an indicator of transfected cells) unilaterally in expression (Fig. 2k). The expression of RALDH2 by LMC neurons brachial and thoracic regions of the stage 12 neural tube (Fig. 2a). directs lateral LMC divisional identity, defined by co-expression of The concentration of FGF8 plasmid was titrated to a level that did Isl2 and Lim117. Consistent with this, we detected a virtually þ þ not perturb neural tube morphology or change the dorsoventral complete loss of Isl2 , Lim1 MNs (Fig. 2j). Thus, increased pattern of progenitor homeodomain proteins (see Methods). FGF8 signalling in brachial neural tube suppresses LMC differen- Expression of FGF8 resulted in the extinction of Hoxc6 expression tiation in a manner that parallels the suppression of Hoxc6 and the onset of Hoxc9 expression at brachial levels (Fig. 2b–f). expression. Similarly, exposure of rostral brachial levels to FGF8 led to the We examined whether the loss of LMC columnar identity is extinction of Hoxc5 and to a rostral expansion in Hoxc8 expression accompanied by the emergence of a thoracic programme of MN (Fig. 2 g, h). Thus, brachial FGF expression results in a brachial to columnar differentiation. After brachial FGF8 expression and thoracic switch in the profile of Hox-c expression. analysis at stage 29, the characteristic ovoid clustering of MNs Because profiles of Hox-c protein expression characteristic of typical of the LMC was lost, and instead MNs were clustered in a lumbar levels of the spinal cord can be induced by early