Arkadiusz Górnisiewicz and Bogdan Szlachta (Eds.) the Concept of Constitution in the History of Political Thought

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Arkadiusz Górnisiewicz and Bogdan Szlachta (Eds.) the Concept of Constitution in the History of Political Thought Arkadiusz Górnisiewicz and Bogdan Szlachta (Eds.) The Concept of Constitution in the History of Political Thought Arkadiusz Górnisiewicz and Bogdan Szlachta (Eds.) The Concept of Constitution in the History of Political Thought Managing Editor: Katarzyna Michalak Associate Editor: Arkadiusz Górnisiewicz Language Editor: Mark C. Anderson ISBN 978-3-11-058191-1 e-ISBN 978-3-11-058192-8 This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 License. For details go to http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/. © 2017 Arkadiusz Górnisiewicz, Bogdan Szlachta and chapter`s contributors. Published by De Gruyter Open Ltd, Warsaw/Berlin Part of Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston The book is published with open access at www.degruyter.com. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data A CIP catalog record for this book has been applied for at the Library of Congress. Managing Editor: Katarzyna Michalak Associate Editor: Arkadiusz Górnisiewicz Language Editor: Mark C. Anderson www.degruyteropen.com Cover illustration: © 2017 4FR, gettyimages Complimentary copy, not for sale. Contents Editors’ Note and Acknowledgments IX Bogdan Szlachta 1 The Ambiguity of Constitutionalism 1 Bibliography 12 Paweł Kaczorowski 2 Epistemology of Constitution 14 2.1 Part One 14 2.2 Part Two 19 2.3 Conclusion 28 Bibliography 29 Alvydas Jokubaitis 3 Can the Constitution Do Away with Nation State? 32 3.1 The Phenomenon of Central and Eastern Europe 33 3.2 The Nature of the Nation State 36 3.3 The Conflict between Nation and Constitution 39 Bibliography 44 Waldemar A. Skrobacki 4 Remarks on the Legal and the Practical: The Rechtsstaat in Europe’s Development of the Rule of Law 45 Bibliography 60 Dorota Pietrzyk-Reeves 5 Magna Carta and the Rise of Anglo-American Constitutionalism 63 5.1 The Great Charter 63 5.2 Magna Carta as a Model in Medieval and Early-Modern Europe 66 5.3 Magna Carta in America 71 5.4 Conclusion 72 Bibliography 73 Kazimierz Michał Ujazdowski 6 The Case of France: Vitality of the Republican Legal Tradition 75 6.1 Idea of the Sovereignty of the Nation and Its Ramifications 76 6.2 Statism and Centralism 80 6.3 Opposition to the Rule of Judges 82 6.4 The Fifth Republic – Institutional Revolution within the Framework of Republican Tradition 84 6.5 Conclusions 85 Bibliography 86 Ferenc Hörcher 7 Is the Historical Constitution of Hungary Still a Living Tradition? A Proposal for Reinterpretation 89 7.1 The Historical Constitution of Hungary: A Diffuse Concept 89 7.2 Political Thought, Constitutional Culture and the “Philosophy” of the Constitution 91 7.3 Historical Layers of Constitutional Life in Hungary 93 7.4 Founding the Historical Constitution? The Golden Bull 93 7.5 Stephen Werbőczy 94 7.6 Stephen Bocskai 96 7.7 Transforming and Reflecting Upon the Historical Constitution: The Eighteenth Century 97 7.8 The Golden Age of Historical Constitutionalism: The Nineteenth Century 99 7.9 Anachronistic Afterlife, Death and Revival (?) of the Historical Constitution: The Twentieth Century 101 7.10 The Achievements and the Failures of the Historical Constitution 105 7.11 How to Reinterpret the Tradition of the Historical Constitution? 108 Bibliography 110 Arkady Rzegocki 8 Polish Constitutional Traditions 113 Bibliography 121 Igor D. Osipov and Leonid V. Smorgunov 9 Russian Constitutionalism 123 9.1 Philosophy of Law and Constitutional Ideas in the 19th and Early 20th Centuries 125 9.2 Ideas of Soviet Constitutionalism 130 9.3 Constitutional Ideas of the Human Rights Movement in the USSR 134 9.4 Constitutionalism in Today’s Russia 139 Bibliography 141 Bogdan Szlachta 10 Theoretical Problems in the Preamble to the 1997 Polish Constitution in the Perspective of History of Political Thought 144 Index 154 IX Editors’ Note and Acknowledgments The aim of the present volume is to discuss the notion of constitution from the per- spectives of history of political thought. Its scholarly intention is to go beyond the approach concentrating on the formal understanding of constitution and bring forward more complex historical and philosophic-political interpretations. Our point of departure was the need to revive the somehow neglected distinction between the idea of constitution as an act of conscious law-giving activity and the notion of consti- tution conceived as the set of fundamental political rules derived from the very nature of political regime and its historical development. We are fully aware that a multi-authored volume cannot retain the coherency and methodological unity offered by a single-authored monograph. Nevertheless, the het- erogeneous character of this volume is mitigated by the effort of the authors to engage the problems of constitutionalism in historical-political perspective. We would like to express our thanks to Dr Kálmán Pócza from Pázmány Péter Catholic University in Budapest for helpful remarks and suggestions. We also thank all the authors for their contributions. Finally, we would like to thank Katarzyna Michalak from De Gruyter Open for her assistance and advice. Dr. Arkadiusz Górnisiewicz and Prof. Bogdan Szlachta Faculty of International and Political Studies The Jagiellonian University in Kraków Bogdan Szlachta1 1 The Ambiguity of Constitutionalism Presently, in literature on the subject, the term “constitutionalism” (from the Latin constitutio – “polity,” “constitution”) is usually associated with the rule of law, a political system in which government actions are taken on the basis of and within the limits set by law. By such an association, the constitution is seen as a normative act of the highest order, from which the highest public authorities (forming and applying the law) draw their authoritative competences. Constitutionalism, therefore, would refer to the most important element of reflection about the “legal state” (Rechtsstaat), in which every act of authority is based on and remains (or should be based on and should remain) within the framework defined by law. Without going into divagations about the legal state, carried out since the second half of the nineteenth century and usually in connection with the popularization of legal positivism, or about the criticism of the supporters of normativism conscious that positivism, contrary to its essence, does not justify the existence of standards from which the legislature derives its right of fixing normative acts, since it is to be the authority setting the provisions of constitutional status, it should be noted that historians of political thought speak carefully about the dominant association of constitutionalism with the concept of providing for the existence of a written basic law. Even if they join in a debate led by lawyers or political scientists engaged in the study of constitutionalism, they still claim that the concepts justifying the restriction of the will of legislators by some nor- mative requirements appeared already in antiquity, not finding them in the written “basic law,” but in the standards of customary, fundamental rights, the standards of God’s or natural law as well as the law of nations, hence in the standards of a “higher law” preceding and limiting the will of the legislator.2 According to histori- ans of political thought, the term “constitutionalism” describes concepts that justify 1 The Jagiellonian University in Kraków. 2 See i.e.: Elkin and Soltan (1993); Elster (1988). However, while the rules binding the will of the authorities, and perhaps also setting the grounds for the system in which they work, need not be included in the written act, they should have a normative and not merely nominal value, since oth- erwise even the written constitution is not honoured by the authorities (although a respect for it is required from the governed). For example, until the late 1980s, in the name of achieving the objectives set by the communist ideology the authorities in the so-called “people’s democracies” frequently violated regulations of the nominal constitutions, did not honour any solid legal principles, following the rules determined arbitrarily or they were guided by the terms of the current effectiveness of the ac- tions; despite the fact that these constitutions granted the citizens of these states (here I am avoiding the problem whether or not they were states) individual rights, for example, to freedom of expression or assembly. The authorities involved in formal constitutional regulations sometimes applied other rules (of an extra-constitutional or even non-legal character), challenging the rights formally held by citizens. Open Access. © 2017 Bogdan Szlachta, published by De Gruyter. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110581928-001 2 The Ambiguity of Constitutionalism opposition to despotism/tyranny (in which the will of the ruler is not limited by a “higher law,” but is treated as the only source of law), and today also against authori- tarianism, referring sometimes to a written constitution, but to some extent allowing actions against the rights and freedoms of individuals. The dominant approach today, binding both constitutionalism and the rule of law with the context of the rights and freedoms of individuals leads, however, in a different direction than the constitution- alism which, for the purposes of this text, can be called “classical.” Such an approach exposed the existence of a “higher law” as a kind of a “normative constitution” of a community with a material value (defined by natural, fundamental or customary law); in the attitude prevailing today more attention is given to the need to ensure the rights and fundamental freedoms of individuals in the written law, and to identify a number of operational procedures of public authorities, in which they should exer- cise their competences, indicated also in the written law.3 In a contemporary sense, constitutionalism was to be born as a result of the denial of absolute monarchy in the 17th-20 th centuries, and the introduction of a constitutional monarchy in which the king, remaining the highest public authority, was to operate on the basis of and within the framework specified in a written act (even if he were to impose it by himself).
Recommended publications
  • Hungary's Policy Towards Its Kin Minorities
    Hungary’s policy towards its kin minorities: The effects of Hungary’s recent legislative measures on the human rights situation of persons belonging to its kin minorities Óscar Alberto Lema Bouza Supervisor: Prof. Zsolt Körtvélyesi Second Semester University: Eötvös Loránd Tudományegyetem, Budapest, Hungary Academic Year 2012/2013 Óscar A. Lema Bouza Abstract Abstract: This thesis focuses on the recent legislative measures introduced by Hungary aimed at kin minorities in the neighbouring countries. Considering as relevant the ones with the largest Hungarian minorities (i.e. Croatia, Romania, Serbia, Slovakia, Slovenia and Ukraine), the thesis starts by presenting the background to the controversy, looking at the history, demographics and politics of the relevant states. After introducing the human rights standards contained in international and national legal instruments for the protection of minorities, the thesis looks at the reasons behind the enactment of the laws. To do so the politically dominant concept of Hungarian nation is examined. Finally, the author looks at the legal and political restrictions these measures face from the perspective of international law and the reactions of the affected countries, respectively. The research shows the strong dependency between the measures and the political conception of the nation, and points out the lack of amelioration of the human rights situation of ethnic Hungarians in the said countries. The reason given for this is the little effects produced on them by the measures adopted by Hungary and the potentially prejudicial nature of the reaction by the home states. The author advocates for a deeper cooperation between Hungary and the home states. Keywords: citizenship, ethnic preference, Fundamental Law, home state, human rights, Hungary, kin state, minorities, nation, Nationality Law, preferential treatment,Status Law.
    [Show full text]
  • The Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth As a Political Space: Its Unity and Complexity*
    Chapter 8 The Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth as a Political Space: Its Unity and Complexity* Satoshi Koyama Introduction The Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth (Rzeczpospolita) was one of the largest states in early modern Europe. In the second half of the sixteenth century, after the union of Lublin (1569), the Polish-Lithuanian state covered an area of 815,000 square kilometres. It attained its greatest extent (990,000 square kilometres) in the first half of the seventeenth century. On the European continent there were only two larger countries than Poland-Lithuania: the Grand Duchy of Moscow (c.5,400,000 square kilometres) and the European territories of the Ottoman Empire (840,000 square kilometres). Therefore the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth was the largest country in Latin-Christian Europe in the early modern period (Wyczański 1973: 17–8). In this paper I discuss the internal diversity of the Commonwealth in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries and consider how such a huge territorial complex was politically organised and integrated. * This paper is a part of the results of the research which is grant-aided by the ‘Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research’ program of the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science in 2005–2007. - 137 - SATOSHI KOYAMA 1. The Internal Diversity of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth Poland-Lithuania before the union of Lublin was a typical example of a composite monarchy in early modern Europe. ‘Composite state’ is the term used by H. G. Koenigsberger, who argued that most states in early modern Europe had been ‘composite states, including more than one country under the sovereignty of one ruler’ (Koenigsberger, 1978: 202).
    [Show full text]
  • From the History of Polish-Austrian Diplomacy in the 1970S
    PRZEGLĄD ZACHODNI I, 2017 AGNIESZKA KISZTELIŃSKA-WĘGRZYŃSKA Łódź FROM THE HISTORY OF POLISH-AUSTRIAN DIPLOMACY IN THE 1970S. AUSTRIAN CHANCELLOR BRUNO KREISKY’S VISITS TO POLAND Polish-Austrian relations after World War II developed in an atmosphere of mutu- al interest and restrained political support. During the Cold War, the Polish People’s Republic and the Republic of Austria were on the opposite sides of the Iron Curtain; however, after 1945 both countries sought mutual recognition and trade cooperation. For more than 10 years following the establishment of diplomatic relations between Austria and Poland, there had been no meetings at the highest level.1 The first con- tact took place when the then Minister of Foreign Affairs, Bruno Kreisky, came on a visit to Warsaw on 1-3 March 1960.2 Later on, Kreisky visited Poland four times as Chancellor of Austria: in June 1973, in late January/early February 1975, in Sep- tember 1976, and in November 1979. While discussing the significance of those five visits, it is worth reflecting on the role of Austria in the diplomatic activity of the Polish Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MFA). The views on the motives of the Austrian politician’s actions and on Austria’s foreign policy towards Poland come from the MFA archives from 1972-1980. The time period covered in this study matches the schedule of the Chancellor’s visits. The activity of the Polish diplomacy in the Communist period (1945-1989) has been addressed as a research topic in several publications on Polish history. How- ever, as Andrzej Paczkowski says in the sixth volume of Historia dyplomacji polskiej (A history of Polish diplomacy), research on this topic is still in its infancy.3 A wide range of source materials that need to be thoroughly reviewed offer a number of 1 Stosunki dyplomatyczne Polski, Informator, vol.
    [Show full text]
  • A Short History of Poland and Lithuania
    A Short History of Poland and Lithuania Chapter 1. The Origin of the Polish Nation.................................3 Chapter 2. The Piast Dynasty...................................................4 Chapter 3. Lithuania until the Union with Poland.........................7 Chapter 4. The Personal Union of Poland and Lithuania under the Jagiellon Dynasty. ..................................................8 Chapter 5. The Full Union of Poland and Lithuania. ................... 11 Chapter 6. The Decline of Poland-Lithuania.............................. 13 Chapter 7. The Partitions of Poland-Lithuania : The Napoleonic Interlude............................................................. 16 Chapter 8. Divided Poland-Lithuania in the 19th Century. .......... 18 Chapter 9. The Early 20th Century : The First World War and The Revival of Poland and Lithuania. ............................. 21 Chapter 10. Independent Poland and Lithuania between the bTwo World Wars.......................................................... 25 Chapter 11. The Second World War. ......................................... 28 Appendix. Some Population Statistics..................................... 33 Map 1: Early Times ......................................................... 35 Map 2: Poland Lithuania in the 15th Century........................ 36 Map 3: The Partitions of Poland-Lithuania ........................... 38 Map 4: Modern North-east Europe ..................................... 40 1 Foreword. Poland and Lithuania have been linked together in this history because
    [Show full text]
  • A TRANSYLVANIAN INTERLUDE on 11 June 1848 Dumitru Brătianu Had
    A TRANSYLVANIAN INTERLUDE On 11 June 1848 Dumitru Brătianu had received his accreditation as diplomatic agent in troubled Austria-Hungary, as the first diplomatic representative of modern Romania.221 Until then, Romanian interests abroad had been represented by officials of the Ottoman suzerain power. He travelled via Vienna, where the situation was confused after the collapse of the interim government led by Karl Ludwig von Fic- quelmont, and reached Pest in late June. Since March, under popular pressure, the Habsburg monarchy appeared to have imploded. Vienna as the official centre of power in the Empire was now challenged by Central European “staging-points in the multilateral contestation” during the events of 1848–49:222 Milan, Buda-Pest,223 Prague, Lemberg, Cracow, Timişoara, Braşov, Blaj and Cluj – to mention just a few of the cities engulfed by the protests – were all bursting with revolu- tionary ferment, political and territorial demands and potential multi- ethnic strife. Only one element in the confusing political landscape of 1848–49 remained stable: the now beleaguered Habsburg dynasty and the principle of dynastic loyalty as the pivotal centre of an otherwise explosive multi-national conundrum. After March and especially after the enactment of the April Laws by the Hungarian Diet, the new Hungarian regime had been operat- ing on the basis of a virtual, if brittle, parliamentary sovereignty and autonomy from Austria. A reformist Hungarian government led by Lajos Batthyány comprised the liberal István Széchenyi, the ‘roman- tic hero’ Lajos Kossuth and the ‘man of the future’, Ferenc Deák.224 Embedded within, and extending beyond, the complex network of constitutional, political, economic and military difficulties facing the empire was the thorny nationalities question.
    [Show full text]
  • Download This PDF File
    20 Y ear s of Ne w Cons tuonal R 20 e Years of New f orms in E Constuonal Reforms as in Eastern Europe t ern Eur ope | Eastern European Experience E as t ern Eur Edited by opean Experience Gennadi N.Cebotarev Peeter Järvelaid Rein Müllerson 20 Years of New Constitutional Reforms in Eastern Europe. Eastern European Experience 20 Years of New Constitutional Reforms in Eastern Europe. Eastern European Experience Edited by Rein Müllerson Gennadi N.Cebotarev Peeter Järvelaid Tallinn University Law School 2015 EAST-WEST STUDIES Journal of Social Scienses of Tallinn University Law School Editorial Board of the Journal of Social Sciences of Tallinn University Law School Professor Peeter Järvelaid, Tallinn Univesity Law School, Estonia Professor Andreas Zimmermann, University of Potsdam, Germany Professor Rein Müllerson, Tallinn University Law School, Estonia President of the Institut de Droit International (2013-2015) Professor Lauri Mälksoo, Tartu University, Estonia Professor Sienho Yee, Wuhan University, China Professor Rein Raud, Tallinn University, Estonia Professor Martti Koskenniemi, Academy of Finland Professor Nigel White, The University of Nottingham, United Kingdom Professor, Dr.iur. Arturs Kucs, Head of Department of International and European Law University of Latvia Faculty of Law Professor Hugh Corder, of Public Law, University of Cape Town Associate Professor Mart Susi, Head of Research Tallinn University Law School, Estonia Dr. Marcel Szabó (PhD), Ombudsman for Future Generations at the Office of the Commissioner for Fundamental Rights,Hungary - Chair of the European Law Department at the Faculty of Law and Political Sciences of the Pázmány Péter Catholic University, Hungary Mr. Raivo Vare, Estonia Copyright 2015: Tallinn University Law School Narva mnt.
    [Show full text]
  • The Concept of Constitution in the History of Political Thought
    Arkadiusz Górnisiewicz and Bogdan Szlachta (Eds.) The Concept of Constitution in the History of Political Thought Arkadiusz Górnisiewicz and Bogdan Szlachta (Eds.) The Concept of Constitution in the History of Political Thought Managing Editor: Katarzyna Michalak Associate Editor: Arkadiusz Górnisiewicz Language Editor: Mark C. Anderson ISBN 978-3-11-058191-1 e-ISBN 978-3-11-058192-8 This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 License. For details go to http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/. © 2017 Arkadiusz Górnisiewicz, Bogdan Szlachta and chapter`s contributors. Published by De Gruyter Open Ltd, Warsaw/Berlin Part of Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston The book is published with open access at www.degruyter.com. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data A CIP catalog record for this book has been applied for at the Library of Congress. Managing Editor: Katarzyna Michalak Associate Editor: Arkadiusz Górnisiewicz Language Editor: Mark C. Anderson www.degruyteropen.com Cover illustration: © 2017 4FR, gettyimages Complimentary copy, not for sale. Contents Editors’ Note and Acknowledgments IX Bogdan Szlachta 1 The Ambiguity of Constitutionalism 1 Bibliography 12 Paweł Kaczorowski 2 Epistemology of Constitution 14 2.1 Part One 14 2.2 Part Two 19 2.3 Conclusion 28 Bibliography 29 Alvydas Jokubaitis 3 Can the Constitution Do Away with Nation State? 32 3.1 The Phenomenon of Central and Eastern Europe 33 3.2 The Nature of the Nation State 36 3.3 The Conflict between Nation and
    [Show full text]
  • Senatus Aulicus. the Rivalry of Political Factions During the Reign of Sigismund I (1506–1548)
    Jacek Brzozowski Wydział Historyczno-Socjologiczny Uniwersytet w Białymstoku Senatus aulicus. The rivalry of political factions during the reign of Sigismund I (1506–1548) When studying the history of the reign of Sigismund I, it is possible to observe that in exercising power the monarch made use of a very small and trusted circle of senators1. In fact, a greater number of them stayed with the King only during Sejm sessions, although this was never a full roster of sena- tors. In the years 1506–1540 there was a total of 35 Sejms. Numerically the largest group of senators was present in 1511 (56 people), while the average attendance was no more than 302. As we can see throughout the whole exa- mined period it is possible to observe a problem with senators’ attendance, whereas ministers were present at all the Sejms and castellans had the worst attendance record with absenteeism of more than 80%3. On December 15, 1534 1 This type of situation was not specific to the reign of Sigismund I. As Jan Długosz reports, during the Sejm in Sieradz in 1425, in a situation of attacks of the knights against the Council, the monarch suspended public work and summoned only eight trusted councellors. In a letter from May 3, 1429 Prince Witold reprimanded the Polish king for excessively yielding to the Szafraniec brothers – the Cracow Chamberlain – Piotr and the Chancellor of the Crown Jan. W. Uruszczak, Państwo pierwszych Jagiellonów 1386–1444, Warszawa 1999, p. 48. 2 In spite of this being such a small group, it must be noted that it was not internally coherent and homogenous.
    [Show full text]
  • Lindsay Schoolcraft Interviewed by Animal English Version
    Lindsay Schoolcraft interviewed by Animal English Version: I've been listening to Cradle of Filth for years and years, a classic in its genre, everyone knows that. I've learned to growl and play the keyboard to their songs, searching for harmony by ear and up to now the albums they've released are on my phone's playlist what the people whose skins I tattoo can easily confirm, since I often have to explain why „he's screaming like that”. And no, I can't turn down the volume, listen, you don't have this at home. They usually calm down right after the entry of the female, classical vocals, which fantastically underscores a section's brutality, the sharp guitar riffs and „Jesus being raped” screams, as one of my tattooist colleagues called it, regularly forced to familiarize himself with this band when he shared a tattooing space with me. My musical fascinations, especially the vocal ones, eventually become drawings and paintings, so one night I sketched Dani, posted it on Instagram with the appropriate hashtags and some time later was very surprised to see a like and comment under the picture from Lindsay Schoolcraft, the new vocalist and person responsible for keyboards in Cradle of Filth. We talked for a while and when it turned out that the beautiful, talented and, most of all, humble Lindz confirms the online stereotype of a Candian citizen (meaning: super-nice; that's right, it appears all the memes are true:) ) I also drew her. You can read the outcome of our chat about online trolls, synthesizers and an upcoming new solo album below.
    [Show full text]
  • University of Southampton Research Repository
    University of Southampton Research Repository Copyright © and Moral Rights for this thesis and, where applicable, any accompanying data are retained by the author and/or other copyright owners. A copy can be downloaded for personal non- commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge. This thesis and the accompanying data cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the copyright holder/s. The content of the thesis and accompanying research data (where applicable) must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holder/s. When referring to this thesis and any accompanying data, full bibliographic details must be given, e.g. Thesis: Katarzyna Kosior (2017) "Becoming and Queen in Early Modern Europe: East and West", University of Southampton, Faculty of the Humanities, History Department, PhD Thesis, 257 pages. University of Southampton FACULTY OF HUMANITIES Becoming a Queen in Early Modern Europe East and West KATARZYNA KOSIOR Doctor of Philosophy in History 2017 ~ 2 ~ UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON ABSTRACT FACULTY OF HUMANITIES History Doctor of Philosophy BECOMING A QUEEN IN EARLY MODERN EUROPE: EAST AND WEST Katarzyna Kosior My thesis approaches sixteenth-century European queenship through an analysis of the ceremonies and rituals accompanying the marriages of Polish and French queens consort: betrothal, wedding, coronation and childbirth. The thesis explores the importance of these events for queens as both a personal and public experience, and questions the existence of distinctly Western and Eastern styles of queenship. A comparative study of ‘Eastern’ and ‘Western’ ceremony in the sixteenth century has never been attempted before and sixteenth- century Polish queens usually do not appear in any collective works about queenship, even those which claim to have a pan-European focus.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Charitable Activity in the Formation of Vilnius Society in the 14Th to Mid-16Th Centuries S.C
    LITHUANIAN historical STUDIES 17 2012 ISSN 1392-2343 PP. 39–69 THE ROLE OF CHARITABLE ACTIVITY IN THE FORMATION OF VILNIUS SOCIETY IN THE 14TH TO MID-16TH CENTURIES S.C. Rowell ABSTRACT This article examines the development of charitable activity in the city of Vilnius and elsewhere in the Grand Duchy of Lithuania before the middle of the sixteenth century by studying the foundation of almshouses to care for the poor and destitute and foster the memory and salvation of pious benefactors. Almshouse foundations developed from increasing forms of practical piety within the GDL from the late fifteenth century, following earlier west European and Polish models. The first, dedicated to traditional patrons of such institutions, St Job and St Mary Magdalene, was founded by a Vilnius canon and medical doctor, Martin of Duszniki with the support of the monarch, Sigismund the Old, and his counsellors between 1518 and 1522. The almshouse swiftly became an established part of the city’s sacral topography. The fashion was adopted by Eastern Orthodox parishes in Vilnius too, and later spread to other confessional groups. Twelve charters are published for the first time in an appendix. Christian charity in public spaces flourished throughout Catholic Europe during the 13th to 15th centuries 1. Indeed, the first chari- table intitutions for the poor are known in England from the tenth century. It behoved the bishop elect on taking his oath of office to protect the poor and the sick 2. Providing lodging and food for the deserving poor over time became the function of almshouses, hospitalia.
    [Show full text]
  • I. BIOGRAPHICAL NOTE the Manuscript of Jan Strzembosz and His Book Collection Have Not Been Deprived of the Attention of Polish Scholaraship
    ORGANON 26-27:1997-1998 AUTEURS ET PROBLEMES Tomasz Strzembosz (Poland) JAN STRZEMBOSZ (1545-1606) HIS MANUSCRIPT AND COLLECTION OF BOOKS I. BIOGRAPHICAL NOTE The manuscript of Jan Strzembosz and his book collection have not been deprived of the attention of Polish scholaraship. The manuscript has been studied by Witold Rubczynski (1922), who, as Aleksander Birken- majer observed, "knew very little about its author". In fact his knowledge was "less than very little". The book collection has received the scholarly regard of many others, writing at diverse times. But none of it has amounted to more than just brief notes, not providing much information about the library collection and its history, and next to none about its original owner. Today, in an age marked by a heightened interest in the Renaissance, Strzem­ bosz’ valuable bibliophile bequest is a worthy subject for academic attention, while the life and achievements of the enlightened and public-spirited col­ lector who endowed us with it merit a few moments of notice. A compilation of the facts published earlier and more recently with the material preserved in the archives and collected still before the Second World War, which has fortunately managed to survive that War, will help to give us a fuller picture of the figure of Jan Strzembosz. In 1538 at Opoczno (now Central Poland), on a date recorded as "f. 5 post Conductum Paschae" the Strzembosz brothers, Mikołaj, the Reverend Andrzej, Derstaw, and Ambroży, sons of Jan Strzembosz of Jablonica and Wieniawa, and later of Dunajewice and Skrzyńsko, Justice of the Borough of Radom1, and Owka (Eufemia), daughter of Dersław Dunin of Smogorze- wo, Lord Crown Treasurer, and Małgorzata of Przysucha, concluded an act for the distribution of the patrimonial and maternal property left to them.
    [Show full text]