September 5, 1980
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
LANNERS NETWORK P.O. BOX 4671, SATHER GATE STATION BERKELEY , CALIFORNIA 94704 #25-September 5, 1980 HELLO NETWORKERS! We are a little slow in getting out this current issue. We much from your contributions. At the moment we have hope we compensate by including the new roster, a gruel $1,500 in the bank, but by the time we pay for this double ing task in composition for which we owe great thanks to issue (including the roster), we'll be down to $500. So Kristin Bedell, Vincent de Pillis, Linda Gardner, Nancey please continue keeping us entered in your checkbook. All Leigh-Preston, Ann Markusen, Anno Saxenian, Erica contributions-large and small-are helpful. Schoenberger, Paul Sussman, RT. Washington, Marc Editorial staff for this issue are Marc Weiss, Linda Weiss, and David Wilmoth. Following the alphabetical Gardner, Patrick O'Donnell, and Nancey Leigh-Preston. entries you will find the geographical cross-references, Production was accomplished by Amy Glasmeier, Erica which are divided into active and retired members. Please Schoenberger, Michael Storper, and Wendy Gleason, with look carefully at the list of retirees for your area. They are our typesetters Hunza and printer into Print. I continue to people we have not heard from since January 1979. Ifyou juggle the overall process and so, for the Collective, thanks know them, warn them that they are being dropped from for your input and let's hear from you again soon!-Ann our list and urge them to write us if they want to stay on. Markusen Our apologies in advance if we have wronged anyone. NETWORK NEWSLETTER COMMENTS We had three reports.of mail returned to people by our P.O. station during the first week of June. The post office From Hiyashi and Sidney Sugaya, Bay Area United Way, 410 can't figure out why it happened, and neither can we. Bush St., San Francisco, CA: "Ah I see the handwriting on the Please send it to us again if this happened to you. wall-bureaucracy vs. the personal touch. As much as I try to The next issue of the newsletter will be a focus issue on think of you all as a bunch of friends ... etc. etc. it comes out more like a smoothly operating assembly line effort, with effi the question of the organizational future of the Network. ciency at the top and a real understanding of the worth of the Chester Hartman has been circulating a memo to folks newsletter at the bottom. Too bad, I guess that's what happens around the country who have been active and interested in when things are shipped to reclusive Berkeley ...." the last year in some sort of organization in addition to the From Pamela Leindecker, 1214 E. Mifflin St., Madison, WI newsletter. He will write up a summary of the ideas and 53703: "Thanks for the work and time you've all been putting in. experiences of various groups and individuals, which will The fact that the newsletter remains a reality is a tribute to constitute the bulk of the next issue. There seems to be everyone who has put in time, energy, and money." From Mike Philips, National League of Cities, 1620 Eye St., strong interest in having a national conference in January N.W., Washington, DC 20006: "Glad to hear the Newsletter is 1981, in the Washington, D.C. area, to tackle the job of in good enthusiastic hands .... Keep up the good work." founding a national radical planners' group. People who From Peter McLaughlin, Urban Coalition of Minneapolis, 89 wish to join in the discussion now can either write to S. 10th St., Minneapolis, MN 55403: "The newsletter looks Chester (by mid-September) or write directly to us for great and is greatly appreciated here in the heartland." inclusion in the same issue. From Diana Lee-Smith, P.O. Box 14550, Nairobi, Keya: "I This issue includes summaries of more regional confer agree with Neil Smith's suggestion about the need for a coherent ences. In watching the comings and goings of Network focus and therefore, possibly, a radical planner's journal. How ever, the current format is also useful and must continue." members on our roster, we are struck by the important function that such conferences and organizational activity serve in keeping the Network strong. Members are still NETWORK ORGANIZING unduly concentrated in large urban areas in the more advanced industrialized states (anyone want to theorize In this issue we are presenting an account of the Planners why?), but the remarkable success that the Southeastern Network Regional Conferences which were held to assess inter est and commitment in forming a national organization initially group has had in recruiting and bringing together progres entitled "A Union of Progressive Planners." Of the several sive planners in their region (see the North Carolina list regional meeting plans announced in Planners Network #22, five ing) shows that a lot ofgood organizing can be done with a were held between February and May 1980: Boston/ New Eng concerted effort! land (2/20/80), San Francisco/ West Coast (4/12/80), New Yor We are a bit disappointed that we haven't received more land (2/20/80), San Francisco/West Coast (4/12/80), New feature material from Networkers. We'd like to do short . York/ East Coast (5/ 10/80), Chicago/ Mid West (5/10/80), and articles (like our MX and hotel conversion pieces last time) Chapel Hill/Southeast (5/ 17/80). Out ofthe New York regional m~eting came the formal resolution which is produced below. It and book reviews, but we need you to contribute. ",,} is followed by an outline of the events which led to the regional We remain solvent. Each Issue has been costing us about meetings and the resolution's formation, and by comments from $500 and so far we have been recovering just about that persons involved in two of the regional meetings. 2 Those interested in obtaining the proceedings from the 2m To meet the financial needs ofthe organization, each member Planners Network Regional Conference held at Columbia un1~ . shall be required to contribute yearly dues. Membership dues versity in May should contact Bob Beauregard, Dept. of Urban shall be adjusted to income (progressively, of course) and Planning, Livingston College-Rutgers, New Brunswick, NJ· there shall be no status differentials in membership. 08903. Please include $1.00 to cover costs. ADMINISTRATIVE STRUCTURE TOWARDS A UNION FOR PROGRESSIVE 1. The organization shall be national in scope with regional PLANNING bodies as well as local 'cells.' 2. The national organization shall be governed by an executive WHEREAS the dominant mode of planning in the United board composed of representatives from each regional and States supports prevailing economic and political relationships, local group, the number of representatives being based upon fosters the accumulation of private capital to the detriment of membership. community welfare, and legitimizes the extant political and a. The executive board shall elect officers for terms to be governmental structures which perpetuate the dominance ofthe determined. many by the few, and b. Upon formation, the executive board shall draft by-laws WHEREAS there is emerging in this country a loose coalition of to be voted upon by the entire membership. individuals who hold a progressive ideology and who share the overall goal of a more progressive society devoid of class domi 3. Each regional and local body shall pay dues to the national nation, racism, and sexism and ofthe types ofenvironments and· organization in proportion to its membership; the remainder social, political and economic conditions they perpetuate, and shall be retained for regional and local activities. WHEREAS such individuals would be more effective if they a. Regional and local groups shall elect officers responsible shared ideas and experiences and had an organization through for calling meetings and coordinating various service which to translate their ideas into actions, and activities. WHEREAS there does not now exist an organization of pro b. Regions and localities shall be determined 'in practice.' gressive planners which would facilitate communication, 4. The national organization shall hold yearly meetings for develop redistributive strategies to bring about a more progres educational purposes and for work on the organization itself. sive society, educate and train other planners and non-planners involved in urban struggles, and serve as a public presence for Regional and local groups shall be encouraged to hold more progressive planning practice, frequent meetings. THEREFORE, be it resolved that a Union for Progressive 5. The national organization shall publish a monthly newsletter Planning be established which has the following characteristics: (in conjunction with the existing Planners Network newslet ter), engage in political activities at the national level (e.g., GOALS AND ACTIVITIES lobbying, testimony before committees), and pursue funding I. Articulate a progressive planning practice and theory in the for national, regional and local activities. Regional and local United States through conferences, workshops, pamphlets, groups shall be encouraged to serve as support groups for position papers, and other forms of mass education. progressive individuals and to engage in community educa~ tion, local research, technical assistance, training sessions, 2. Speak out on substantive public issues through testimony to conferences, forums, film series, and other activities devoted legislative bodies, position papers, legal actions, and press to education and action around substantive progressive releases. themes. 3. Provide organizational support for practicing planners and 6. The national organization shall institute actions to establish community groups wishing to improve their working condi on-going liaisons with other national, progressive organiza tions and/or to encourage progressive social change. tions; regional and local groups shall be encouraged to do the 4.