DOCSLIB.ORG

Basis of Claims and Background Information on Asylum-Seekers and Refugees from the Republic of Belarus

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Basis of Claims and Background Information on Asylum-Seekers and Refugees from the Republic of Belarus Basis of Claims and Background Information on Asylum-Seekers and Refugees from the Republic of Belarus This report has been produced by UNHCR on the basis of information obtained from a variety of publicly available sources, analyses and comments. The report is intended for reference by those involved in the asylum determination process and concentrates on the issues most commonly raised in asylum claims lodged in various jurisdictions. The information contained does not purport to be either exhaustive with regard to conditions in the country surveyed nor conclusive as to the merit of any particular claim to refugee status or asylum. Incomplete, inaccurate or incorrect information cannot be ruled out. The inclusion of information in this report does not cons titute an endorsement of the information or the views of third parties . Neither does such information necessarily represent statements of policy or views of UNHCR or the United Nations. United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) Geneva October 2004 * [* Information is up-to-date as of July 2004.] Department of International Protection 2 Protection Information Section TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF ACRONYMS .......................................................................................................4 I. INTRODUCTION ..........................................................................................5 II. MAIN ASYLUM CLAIMS BY GROUPS .........................................................5 III. SOME RELEVANT LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS ............................................5 A. Journalists and Media workers, Human Rights Advocates, and Political Opponents.................................................................................................................6 B. Draft Evaders/Deserters ..................................................................................6 C. Religious Minorities.........................................................................................9 D. Gender-related Claims: Homosexuals .........................................................11 E. Conclusions .....................................................................................................11 ANNEX 1: BACKGROUND INFORMATION ......................................................................2 A. General Information on Belarus ........................................................................2 1. Government....................................................................................................3 2. Economy ........................................................................................................3 B. Political Developments.....................................................................................5 1. Since 1991......................................................................................................5 2. Political Parties ..............................................................................................6 3. Parliamentary Elections – October 2000 .......................................................9 4. Presidential Elections – September 2001.....................................................10 C. Some Significant Aspects of International Relations ..................................12 D. Review of Material on the General Human Rights Considerations in Belarus.....................................................................................................................15 1. Freedom of Religion....................................................................................17 2. Freedom of Movement.................................................................................19 3. Freedom of Assembly..................................................................................20 4. Freedom of Expression................................................................................21 5. Human Rights Organizations and Civil Society..........................................27 6. Political Opposition.....................................................................................29 7. “Disappearances”.........................................................................................32 8. Law Enforcement .........................................................................................34 9. Death Penalty...............................................................................................35 10. Draft Evaders/Deserters ...............................................................................36 11. Trafficking in People ...................................................................................38 12. Ethnic Minorities..........................................................................................39 Department of International Protection 3 Protection Information Section 13. Homosexuals................................................................................................43 ANNEX 2: REFUGEES & ASYLUM SEEKERS FROM BELARUS .....................................45 ANNEX 3: REFUGEES IN BELARUS ...............................................................................48 A. UNHCR Operations 1999-2003 ....................................................................48 B. Treatment of Refugees and Asylum-seekers ...............................................49 ANNEX 4: STATE SYMBOLS/PASSPORT.......................................................................52 ANNEX 5: BIBLIOGRAPHY ...........................................................................................54 ANNEX 6: MAP OF REPUBLIC OF BELARUS , JUNE 2003 .............................................62 Department of International Protection 4 Protection Information Section LIST OF ACRONYMS AI Amnesty International AMG Advisory and Monitoring Group BAJ Belarusian Association of Journalists BPF Belarusian Popular Front BPL Belarusian Party of Labor BSDG Belarusian Social Democratic Gromada BSDP Belarusian Social Democratic Party (Narodnaya Hramada) CAT Committee Against Torture CEC Central Election Commission CEDAW Committee on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women CERD Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination CIS Commonwealth of Independent States CPB Communist Party of Belarus CRC Committee on the Rights of the Child DOM Department of Migration EIU Economist Intelligence Unit EU European Union FSU Former Soviet Union LEOM Limited Election Observation Mission MOJ Ministry of Justice NGO Non-governmental organization ODIHR Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights OSCE Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe PACE Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe PCB Party of Communists of Belarus UCP United Civic Party Department of International Protection 5 Protection Information Section I. INTRODUCTION 1. Based on official statistics made available to UNHCR by asylum countries, the number of citizens from the Republic of Belarus (“Belarus”) claiming asylum in 29 of the most industrialized countries in the world, while limited, has increased in the last few years. Since the early 1990s, some 18,200 citizens from Belarus applied for asylum in these countries, with the number of claims peaking in 2002 (3,600) and 2003 (3,500).1 Some 200-300 Belarusian nationals receive refugee status per year, which reflects a beyond average recognition rate of approximately 10 per cent.2 2. This trend has generated numerous queries addressed to UNHCR by asylum countries assembling information relevant to the determination of the status of asylum-seekers originating from Belarus. UNHCR Geneva has been requested to assist in this latter regard. This background paper has been prepared by UNHCR Geneva in response to queries for general information and for the analysis of relevant legal considerations on asylum claims lodged. Neither can be considered an exhaustive analysis. II. MAIN ASYLUM CLAIMS BY GROUPS 3. Claims lodged by asylum seekers from Belarus fall generally into one of the following categories: claims by journalists, media workers and human rights defenders for having openly criticized the authorities; claims from political opponents whose political opinions are allegedly perceived as a threat by the authorities; those asylum-seekers who base their claim on the fact that they are draft evaders or deserters; and religious minorities. 4. See the Annexes of this paper for a compilation of publicly available background material relating variously to the situations of above-mentioned claims. III. SOME RELEVANT LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS 5. UNHCR consistently recommends that all asylum-seekers, regardless of their origin, be given access to individual refugee status determination procedures, where available. 6. This section sets out legal considerations bearing upon the above groupings of claimants from Belarus. UNHCR’s Handbook on Procedures and Criteria for Determining Refugee Status under the 1951 Convention and the 1967 Protocol relating to the Status of Refugees, (“Handbook”) 3 is an important source of guidance in this regard. 1 For more detailed information, please see section of Annex 2 entitled “Refugees and asylum-seekers from Belarus.” In the Republic of Belarus, UNHCR Minsk works with asylum seekers arriving in Belarus. For a description of refugees and asylum seekers arriving in Belarus, see Annex 3 of this paper. Most of the sources cited in this paper are available in Refworld CD ROM. 2 Statistical information of UNHCR, Population Data Unit. 3 Handbook on Procedures and Criteria for Determining
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Reports Submitted by States Parties Under Article 9 of the Convention Belarus*, ** International Convention on the Elimination O
    United Nations CERD/C/BLR/18-19 International Convention on Distr.: General 15 November 2012 the Elimination of All Forms English of Racial Discrimination Original: Russian Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination Reports submitted by States parties under article 9 of the Convention Eighteenth and nineteenth periodic reports of States parties due in 2008 Belarus*, ** [3 August 2012] * This document contains the eighteenth and nineteenth periodic reports of Belarus due on 8 May 2008, submitted in one document. Fifteenth, sixteenth and seventeenth periodic reports (CERD/C/431/Add.9) were considered by the Committee at its 1650th and 1651st meetings held on 5 and 6 August 2004 (CERD/C/SR.1650 and 1651). ** In accordance with the information transmitted to the States parties regarding the processing of their reports, the present document was not edited. GE.12-47774 (E) 130213 270313 CERD/C/BLR/18-19 Contents Paragraphs Page I. Introduction............................................................................................................. 1–7 3 II. Information on implementation of the Convention................................................. 8–63 3 Article 1. Legislation on prevention of discrimination ........................................... 8–20 3 Article 2. Fulfilling the obligation to eliminate all forms of racial discrimination and related intolerance ............................................................................................ 21–40 5 Article 3. Condemning racial segregation and apartheid .......................................
    [Show full text]
  • Dear Delegates, Congratulations on Being Selected to the Kremlin, One of VMUN's Most Advanced Committees. My Name Is Harrison
    Dear Delegates, Congratulations on being selected to the Kremlin, one of VMUN’s most advanced committees. My name is Harrison Ritchie, and I will be your director for this year’s conference. I have been involved in MUN since Grade 10, and have thoroughly enjoyed every conference that I have attended. This year’s Kremlin will be a historical crisis committee. In February, you will all be transported to the October of 1988, where you will be taking on the roles of prominent members of either the Soviet Politburo or Cabinet of Ministers. As powerful Soviet officials, you will be debating the fall of the Soviet Union, or, rather, how to keep the Union together in such a tumultuous time. In the Soviet Union’s twilight years, a ideological divide began to emerge within the upper levels of government. Two distinct blocs formed out of this divide: the hardliners, who wished to see a return to totalitarian Stalinist rule, and the reformers, who wished to progress to a more democratic Union. At VMUN, delegates will hold the power to change the course of history. By exacting your influence upon your peers, you will gain valuable allies and make dangerous enemies. There is no doubt that keeping the Union together will be no easy task, and there are many issues to address over the coming three days, but I hope that you will be thoroughly engrossed in the twilight years of one of the world’s greatest superpower and find VMUN an overall fulfilling experience. Good luck in your research, and as always, if you have any questions, feel free to contact me before the conference.
    [Show full text]
  • Paradoxes of Belarus in the Post-Soviet Era
    Click here for Full Issue of EIR Volume 22, Number 36, September 8, 1995 �IIillNational EconolllY Paradoxes of Belarus in the post-Soviet era by Konstantin Cheremnykh The author recently returned from a visit to Belarus, where demonstrated the popularity of the Agrarian Party candi­ he was part of a delegation representing the Schiller Institute dates, as well as other representatives of the productive sector andEIR. of the economy. At the same time, not a single representative of the Belorussian People's Front, the vanguard of the liberal On May 14, the people of Belarus Republic answered the nationalists, was elected to the new Parliament. Even were four questions of the referendum held under the order of the threshold 25%, BPF leader Zenon Pazniak would be President Alexander Lukashenko. Over 75% of the popula­ second, and not first in his district. tion said "yes" to the state symbol resembling (but not equal The elections were conducted according to the majorit­ to) the symbol of the Belorussian Soviet Socialist Republic: arian principle, that is, no party slates were used. Parties the flag with a wider red and a narrow green stripe, the could declare their support to those whom they put forward, latter decorated with a traditional Belorussian ornament, but but all the candidates had to win a majority of voters in their without a gold hammer-and-sickle and star, and the heraldic districts. This system was introduced by President Lukashen­ with rye ears filled with grain on both sides. The armed ko, together with a high minimum number of voters, as "the horseman with a Greek Catholic cross on his shield, and the better way to ensure that the new parliamentarians are real vertical red-white-red stripes of the flag adopted three years representatives of the people." One may like such a system ago appeared to be quite unpopular.
    [Show full text]
  • Time Project Event Unite the Nations 3 May 2011
    Time Project Event 2011 May 3rd 2011 TIME PROJECT EVENT UNITE THE NATIONS 3 MAY 2011 Short instruction: 1) How many questions do I have to answer? There are 250 questions. Every Country has 25 questions. Every school HAS to answer 225 questions, which means you do not ANSWER THE 25 questions FROM YOUR OWN COUNTRY. For example: Russia: There are 25 questions about Russia. More than one school from Rusia contributed questions which means there may be some Russian questions some Russian students may not recognize (they came from the other school ). Schools from Russia do not answer the 25 questions about Russia regardless of who contributed the questions. You never answer the questions about YOUR OWN COUNTRY. 2) How do I find the answers? - Encyclopaedias, the Internet, the Library or other sources at school or in the community - Get in touch with other time participants to find answers to questions which are difficult for you. 3) Where and when do I send the answers? Questions have to answered on line at the ZOHO Challenge Site. https://challenge.zoho.com/unite_the_nations_2011 Test starts 00:00 GMT May 3rd 2011 - Deadline: 00:00 GMT/UTC 4 May 2011! Other questions?? Get in touch with Event Co-ordinator ! [email protected] phone: +01.519.452.8310 cellphone +01.519.200.5092 fax: +01.519.452. 8319 And now…the game! Time Project Event 2011 May 3rd 2011 ARTS Argentina 1) Who wrote the book "Martin Fierro"? a) Jose Hernandez b) Peschisolido miguel angel c) David vineyards d) Jorge Luis Borges 2) What is the typical dance of Argentina? a) quartet b) tango c) cumbia d) capoeira 3) Who was Carlos Gardel? a) a singer of cumbia b) a soccer player c) a singer of tango d) a former president 4) Who was Lola Mora? a) a model b) a sculptor c) an athlete d) a journalist 5) Which Argentine made and released the world's first animated feature film.
    [Show full text]
  • 2. Historical, Cultural and Ethnic Roots1
    2. HISTORICAL, CULTURAL AND ETHNIC ROOTS1 General features of ethnic identity evolution history, to develop autonomous state structures, in the eastern part of Europe their lives have mostly been determined by out- side forces with diverse geopolitical interests. Differences may be observed between Eastern The uncertain political situation of past cen- and Western Europe in terms of the ethnogenesis turies gave rise – along the linguistic, cultural of the peoples and the development of their eth- and political fault lines – to several ethnic groups nic identity. In the eastern half of the continent, with uncertain identities, disputed allegiances rather than be tied to the confines of a particular and divergent political interests. Even now, there state, community identity and belonging have exist among the various groups overlaps, differ- tended to emerge from the collective memory of ences and conflicts which arose in earlier periods. a community of linguistic and cultural elements The characteristic features of the groups have not or, on occasion, from the collective memory of a been placed in a clearly definable framework. state that existed in an earlier period (Romsics, In the eastern half of Europe, the various I. 1998). The evolution of the eastern Slavic and ethnic groups are at different stages of devel- Baltic peoples constitutes a particular aspect of opment in terms of their ethnic identity. The this course. We can, therefore, gain insights into Belarusian people, who speak an eastern Slavic the historical foundations of the ethnic identity language, occupy a special place among these of the inhabitants of today’s Belarus – an identity groups.
    [Show full text]
  • Testimony :: Stephen Nix
    Testimony :: Stephen Nix Regional Program Director, Eurasia - International Republican Institute Mr. Chairman, I wish to thank you for the opportunity to testify before the Commission today. We are on the eve of a presidential election in Belarus which holds vital importance for the people of Belarus. The government of the Republic of Belarus has the inherit mandate to hold elections which will ultimately voice the will of its people. Sadly, the government of Belarus has a track record of denying this responsibility to its people, its constitution, and the international community. Today, the citizens of Belarus are facing a nominal election in which their inherit right to choose their future will not be granted. The future of democracy in Belarus is of strategic importance; not only to its people, but to the success of the longevity of democracy in all the former Soviet republics. As we have witnessed in Georgia and Ukraine, it is inevitable that the time will come when the people stand up and demand their rightful place among their fellow citizens of democratic nations. How many more people must be imprisoned or fined or crushed before this time comes in Belarus? Mr. Chairman, the situation in Belarus is dire, but the beacon of hope in Belarus is shining. In the midst of repeated human rights violations and continual repression of freedoms, a coalition of pro-democratic activists has emerged and united to offer a voice for the oppressed. The courage, unselfishness and determination of this coalition are truly admirable. It is vitally important that the United States and Europe remain committed to their support of this democratic coalition; not only in the run up to the election, but post-election as well.
    [Show full text]
  • Republic of Belarus
    August 1997 Vol. 9 No. 8 (D) REPUBLIC OF BELARUS CRUSHING CIVIL SOCIETY AWhat scares me most is to see how fragile our freedom turned out to be. I used to think that the freedom we had achieved would never be taken away from us again.@ Yury Drakokhurst, Belarusian journalist. SUMMARY.................................................................................................................................................................................3 RECOMMENDATIONS.............................................................................................................................................................4 A NOTE ON GEOGRAPHY AND DEMOGRAPHY ................................................................................................................6 BACKGROUND .........................................................................................................................................................................6 Weakening Parliament and the Judiciary.......................................................................................................................7 The Referendum..............................................................................................................................................7 Legislative Powers of the President.................................................................................................................8 The National Assembly (Parliament) ..............................................................................................................8
    [Show full text]
  • Prospects for Democracy in Belarus
    An Eastern Slavic Brotherhood: The Determinative Factors Affecting Democratic Development in Ukraine and Belarus Thesis Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Nicholas Hendon Starvaggi, B.A. Graduate Program in Slavic and East European Studies The Ohio State University 2009 Thesis Committee: Trevor Brown, Advisor Goldie Shabad Copyright by Nicholas Hendon Starvaggi 2009 Abstract Following the collapse of the Soviet Union, fifteen successor states emerged as independent nations that began transitions toward democratic governance and a market economy. These efforts have met with various levels of success. Three of these countries have since experienced “color revolutions,” which have been characterized by initial public demonstrations against the old order and a subsequent revision of the rules of the political game. In 2004-2005, these “color revolutions” were greeted by many international observers with optimism for these countries‟ progress toward democracy. In hindsight, however, the term itself needs to be assessed for its accuracy, as the political developments that followed seemed to regress away from democratic goals. In one of these countries, Ukraine, the Orange Revolution has brought about renewed hope in democracy, yet important obstacles remain. Belarus, Ukraine‟s northern neighbor, shares many structural similarities yet has not experienced a “color revolution.” Anti- governmental demonstrations in Minsk in 2006 were met with brutal force that spoiled the opposition‟s hopes of reenacting a similar political outcome to that which Ukraine‟s Orange Coalition was able to achieve in 2004. Through a comparative analysis of these two countries, it is found that the significant factors that prevented a “color revolution” in Belarus are a cohesive national identity that aligns with an authoritarian value system, a lack of engagement with U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Constructions and Instrumentalization of the Past: a Comparative Study on Memory Management in the Region
    CBEES State of the Region Report 2020 Constructions and Instrumentalization of the Past A Comparative Study on Memory Management in the Region Published with support from the Foundation for Baltic and East European Studies (Östersjstiftelsen) Constructions and Instrumentalization of the Past A Comparative Study on Memory Management in the Region December 2020 Publisher Centre for Baltic and East European Studies, CBEES, Sdertrn University © CBEES, Sdertrn University and the authors Editor Ninna Mrner Editorial Board Joakim Ekman, Florence Frhlig, David Gaunt, Tora Lane, Per Anders Rudling, Irina Sandomirskaja Layout Lena Fredriksson, Serpentin Media Proofreading Bridget Schaefer, Semantix Print Elanders Sverige AB ISBN 978-91-85139-12-5 4 Contents 7 Preface. A New Annual CBEES Publication, Ulla Manns and Joakim Ekman 9 Introduction. Constructions and Instrumentalization of the Past, David Gaunt and Tora Lane 15 Background. Eastern and Central Europe as a Region of Memory. Some Common Traits, Barbara Trnquist-Plewa ESSAYS 23 Victimhood and Building Identities on Past Suffering, Florence Frhlig 29 Image, Afterimage, Counter-Image: Communist Visuality without Communism, Irina Sandomirskaja 37 The Toxic Memory Politics in the Post-Soviet Caucasus, Thomas de Waal 45 The Flag Revolution. Understanding the Political Symbols of Belarus, Andrej Kotljarchuk 55 Institutes of Trauma Re-production in a Borderland: Poland, Ukraine, and Lithuania, Per Anders Rudling COUNTRY BY COUNTRY 69 Germany. The Multi-Level Governance of Memory as a Policy Field, Jenny Wstenberg 80 Lithuania. Fractured and Contested Memory Regimes, Violeta Davoliūtė 87 Belarus. The Politics of Memory in Belarus: Narratives and Institutions, Aliaksei Lastouski 94 Ukraine. Memory Nodes Loaded with Potential to Mobilize People, Yuliya Yurchuk 106 Czech Republic.
    [Show full text]
  • The EU and Belarus – a Relationship with Reservations Dr
    BELARUS AND THE EU: FROM ISOLATION TOWARDS COOPERATION EDITED BY DR. HANS-GEORG WIECK AND STEPHAN MALERIUS VILNIUS 2011 UDK 327(476+4) Be-131 BELARUS AND THE EU: FROM ISOLATION TOWARDS COOPERATION Authors: Dr. Hans-Georg Wieck, Dr. Vitali Silitski, Dr. Kai-Olaf Lang, Dr. Martin Koopmann, Andrei Yahorau, Dr. Svetlana Matskevich, Valeri Fadeev, Dr. Andrei Kazakevich, Dr. Mikhail Pastukhou, Leonid Kalitenya, Alexander Chubrik Editors: Dr. Hans-Georg Wieck, Stephan Malerius This is a joint publication of the Centre for European Studies and the Konrad- Adenauer-Stiftung. This publication has received funding from the European Parliament. Sole responsibility for facts or opinions expressed in this publication rests with the authors. The Centre for European Studies, the Konrad-Adenauer- Stiftung and the European Parliament assume no responsibility either for the information contained in the publication or its subsequent use. ISBN 978-609-95320-1-1 © 2011, Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung e.V., Sankt Augustin / Berlin © Front cover photo: Jan Brykczynski CONTENTS 5 | Consultancy PROJECT: BELARUS AND THE EU Dr. Hans-Georg Wieck 13 | BELARUS IN AN INTERnational CONTEXT Dr. Vitali Silitski 22 | THE EU and BELARUS – A Relationship WITH RESERvations Dr. Kai-Olaf Lang, Dr. Martin Koopmann 34 | CIVIL SOCIETY: AN analysis OF THE situation AND diRECTIONS FOR REFORM Andrei Yahorau 53 | Education IN BELARUS: REFORM AND COOPERation WITH THE EU Dr. Svetlana Matskevich 70 | State bodies, CONSTITUTIONAL REALITY AND FORMS OF RULE Valeri Fadeev 79 | JudiciaRY AND law
    [Show full text]
  • General Conclusions and Basic Tendencies 1. System of Human Rights Violations
    REVIEW-CHRONICLE OF THE HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS IN BELARUS IN 2003 2 REVIEW-CHRONICLE OF THE HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS IN BELARUS IN 2003 INTRODUCTION: GENERAL CONCLUSIONS AND BASIC TENDENCIES 1. SYSTEM OF HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS The year 2003 was marked by deterioration of the human rights situation in Belarus. While the general human rights situation in the country did not improve, in its certain spheres it significantly changed for the worse. Disrespect for and regular violations of the basic constitutional civic rights became an unavoidable and permanent factor of the Belarusian reality. In 2003 the Belarusian authorities did not even hide their intention to maximally limit the freedom of speech, freedom of association, religious freedom, and human rights in general. These intentions of the ruling regime were declared publicly. It was a conscious and open choice of the state bodies constituting one of the strategic elements of their policy. This political process became most visible in formation and forced intrusion of state ideology upon the citizens. Even leaving aside the question of the ideology contents, the very existence of an ideology, compulsory for all citizens of the country, imposed through propaganda media and educational establishments, and fraught with punitive sanctions for any deviation from it, is a phenomenon, incompatible with the fundamental human right to have a personal opinion. Thus, the state policy of the ruling government aims to create ideological grounds for consistent undermining of civic freedoms in Belarus. The new ideology is introduced despite the Constitution of the Republic of Belarus which puts a direct ban on that.
    [Show full text]
  • Mapping International Responses to the Political Crisis in Belarus 01 What Is Happening in Belarus? 3
    Mapping International Responses to the Political Crisis in Belarus 01 What is happening in Belarus? 3 02 What is the project about? 6 03 What are sanctions? 8 04 What are the types of sanctions? 10 05 What sanctions against Belarus are currently in place? 15 06 What other international respon- ses are in place, besides sanctions? 22 07 What has been the response of the Belarusian de facto leadership? 26 08 What has been the reaction of civil society and alter- native democratic forces? 28 In August 2020 protests erupted in Belarus, following an allegedly rigged presidential election. Police brutality and political persecu- tion continue to date. International actors adopt various responses to the political and human rights crisis, including sanctions. As representatives of civil society, we are deeply concerned with the current political crisis unfolding in Belarus. By mapping inter- national responses to the crisis, we explore the toolbox used by various actors to ensure accountability and inspire change. The project’s goal is to monitor, document, and analyse international responses, seeking to clarify their complex nature to the general public, as well as to inform advocacy efforts. What is happening in Belarus? Belarus has been under the rule of Alexander Lukashenko1 since 1994. Originally authorised to serve for two presidential terms, Lukashenko initiated two referen- da on amending the constitution in 1996 and 2004. The contested outcomes of the referenda allowed him to run for the post indefinitely and widened the extent of presidential powers, effectively turning Belarus into a presidential republic.2 Lukashenko’s presidency has been marked by authoritarianism and oppression.
    [Show full text]