Magnesium Bisulfite Pulping and Papermaking with Southern Pine
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Revised 8/29/06
REVISED 8/29/06 2006 Engineering, Pulping & Environmental Conference 11/5/2006 - 11/8/2006 Marriott Marquis Atlanta, GA 11/5/06 Session: 1 8:00 a.m. – 12:30 p.m. Eucalyptus Workshop (supplemental fee to attend) Session 2: 8:00 a.m. – 4:00 p.m. Bleach Plant Workshop (supplemental fee to attend) Session 3: 1:00 p.m. – 5:00 p.m. Process Simulation/Engineering Valves Design Tutorial Session 4: 2:00 p.m. – 5:00 p.m. Recycling Workshop (supplemental fee to attend) 11/6/2006 8:30:a.m. - 10:00:a.m. Session: 5 Opening Session-Awards/Keynote 10:30:a.m. - 12:30:p.m. Session: 6 Nonwood Pulping Session Chair Jairo Lora, GreenValue SA 6 - 1 10:30 am Chemical and Pulp Characteristics of Corn Stalk Fractions Medwick V. Byrd, Jr., North Carolina State University, Speaker Sean M. Warby, North Carolina State University Whole corn stalk (stover) was separated into three fractions: stalk, leaves, and husks. Each fraction was milled and tested for ash content, cold water solubles, hot water solubles, NaOH solubles, solvent extractables, and klason lignin content. With respect to lignin content, the test values showed that stalks > leaves > husks. Ash content values were similar for all three fractions. The leaf fraction had higher levels of all solubles, compared to the other fractions. The stalk faction had the highest level of solvent extractables. Each fraction was pulped, using a soda-AQ process. The yield and fiber properties of each resulting pulp sample were compared 6-2 11:00 am The Spanish "Biovid" Project. -
The Manufacture of Paper
/°* '^^^n^ //i,- '^r. c.^" ^'IM^"* *»^ A^ -h^" .0^ V ,<- ^.. A^^ /^-^ " THE MANUFACTURE OF PAPER BY R. W. SINDALL, F.C.S. CHEMIST CONSULTING TO THE WOOD PULP AND PAPER TRADES ; LECTURER ON PAPER-MAKING FOR THE HERTFORDSHIRE COUNTY COUNCIL, THE BUCKS COUNTY COUNCIL, THE PRINTING AND STATIONERY TRADES AT EXETER HALL, 1903-4, THE INSTITUTE OF PRINTERS ; TECHNICAL ADVISER TO THE GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, 1905 AUTHOR OF "paper TECHNOLOGY," " THE SAMPLING OF WOOD PULP " JOINT AUTHOR OF " THE C.B.S. UNITS, OR STANDARDS OF PAPER TESTING," " THE APPLICATIONS OF WOOD PULP," ETC. WITH ILLUSTRATIONS, AND A BIBLIOGRAPHY OF WORKS RELATING TO CELLULOSE AND PAPER-MAKING ^^RlFFeo^ ^^ ^, 11^ OCT 3 11910 ^^f-40 ^\^c> A BU\ lo\' NEW YORK D. VAN NOSTRAND COMPANY 23 MURRAY AND 27 WARREN STREETS 1908 By trassf»r trom U. S. Tariff Boarri 1012 /(o'?'<Q / PREFACE •Papee-making, in common with many other industries, is one in which both engineering and chemistry play important parts. Unfortunately the functions of the engineer and chemist are generally regai^dedi •a&n.inelepejident of one another, so that the chemist ife^o^ify e^llfeS-iii-hy the engineer when efforts along the lines of nlecTianical improvement have failed, and vice versa. It is impossible, however, to draw a hard and fast line, and the best results in the art of paper-making are only possible when the manufacturer appreciates the fact that the skill of both is essential to progress and commercial success. In the present elementary text-book it is only proposed to give an outline of the various stages of manufacture and to indicate some of the improvements made during recent years. -
So2 and Wine: a Review
OIV COLLECTIVE EXPERTISE DOCUMENT SO2 AND WINE: A REVIEW SO2 AND WINE: A REVIEW 1 MARCH 2021 OIV COLLECTIVE EXPERTISE DOCUMENT SO2 AND WINE: A REVIEW WARNING This document has not been submitted to the step procedure for examining resolutions and cannot in any way be treated as an OIV resolution. Only resolutions adopted by the Member States of the OIV have an official character. This document has been drafted in the framework of Expert Group “Food safety” and revised by other OIV Commissions. This document, drafted and developed on the initiative of the OIV, is a collective expert report. © OIV publications, 1st Edition: March 2021 (Paris, France) ISBN 978-2-85038-022-8 OIV - International Organisation of Vine and Wine 35, rue de Monceau F-75008 Paris - France www.oiv.int 2 MARCH 2021 OIV COLLECTIVE EXPERTISE DOCUMENT SO2 AND WINE: A REVIEW SCOPE The group of experts « Food safety » of the OIV has worked extensively on the safety assessment of different compounds found in vitivinicultural products. This document aims to gather more specific information on SO2. This document has been prepared taking into consideration the information provided during the different sessions of the group of experts “Food safety” and information provided by Member States. Finally, this document, drafted and developed on the initiative of the OIV, is a collective expert report. This review is based on the help of scientific literature and technical works available until date of publishing. COORDINATOR OIV - International Organisation of Vine and Wine AUTHORS Dr. Creina Stockley (AU) Dr. Angelika Paschke-Kratzin (DE) Pr. -
) (51) International Patent Classification: KR, KW, KZ, LA, LC
) ( (51) International Patent Classification: HR, HU, ID, IL, IN, IR, IS, JO, JP, KE, KG, KH, KN, KP, D21H 27/00 (2006.01) D21C 5/00 (2006.01) KR, KW, KZ, LA, LC, LK, LR, LS, LU, LY, MA, MD, ME, D21H 27/10 (2006.01) D21H 11/12 (2006.01) MG, MK, MN, MW, MX, MY, MZ, NA, NG, NI, NO, NZ, OM, PA, PE, PG, PH, PL, PT, QA, RO, RS, RU, RW, SA, (21) International Application Number: SC, SD, SE, SG, SK, SL, SM, ST, SV, SY, TH, TJ, TM, TN, PCT/US20 19/0 18723 TR, TT, TZ, UA, UG, US, UZ, VC, VN, ZA, ZM, ZW. (22) International Filing Date: (84) Designated States (unless otherwise indicated, for every 20 February 2019 (20.02.2019) kind of regional protection available) . ARIPO (BW, GH, (25) Filing Language: English GM, KE, LR, LS, MW, MZ, NA, RW, SD, SL, ST, SZ, TZ, UG, ZM, ZW), Eurasian (AM, AZ, BY, KG, KZ, RU, TJ, (26) Publication Language: English TM), European (AL, AT, BE, BG, CH, CY, CZ, DE, DK, (30) Priority Data: EE, ES, FI, FR, GB, GR, HR, HU, IE, IS, IT, LT, LU, LV, 62/635,403 26 February 2018 (26.02.2018) US MC, MK, MT, NL, NO, PL, PT, RO, RS, SE, SI, SK, SM, TR), OAPI (BF, BJ, CF, CG, Cl, CM, GA, GN, GQ, GW, (72) Inventors; and KM, ML, MR, NE, SN, TD, TG). (71) Applicants: PAUWELS, David [US/US]; P.O. Box 1243, Eureka, CA 95502-1243 (US). ANDERSEN, Tiffany Published: [US/US]; P.O. -
Design and Manufacturing of Disc Refiner
International Journal of Emerging Technology in Computer Science & Electronics (IJETCSE) ISSN: 0976-1353 Volume 21 Issue 3 – APRIL 2016. DESIGN AND MANUFACTURING OF DISC REFINER S.Hanish Anand[1], P.Manigandan [2]J.Satish Kumar[3], J.Evan Cephas Jeffrey[4], Assistant Professor, Mechanical, Kings Engineering College, Chennai, India 1 Assistant Professor, Mechanical, Kings Engineering College, Chennai, India 2 Student, Mechanical,Kings Engineering College ,Chennai, India 3 Student, Mechanical, Kings Engineering College, Chennai, India 4 important aspect of the process, as it is here that the Abstract— Refining or beating of chemical pulps is the mechanical characteristics of the cellulose fibres and the composition of the treatment and modification of fibres so that they can be formed into papermaking furnish that comprise paper are determined, which paper or board of the desired properties. It is one of the most affect how the fibres bind with each other during the formation important unit operations when preparing papermaking fibres for high-quality papers or paperboards.For which various instrument of the paper web and what the various optical, structural, and were used of which first beater commonly called as Hollander chemical properties of the paper will be good. beater in which various problems are occurred. But various refiners have now replaced beaters and the term "refining" is 2.1HOLLANDER BEATER widely used. In fact, both terms are synonymously used, but here There are two basic methods for pulp refining. The the term "refining" is used to describe the work accomplished with refiners on the fibres.The mostly used is disc refiner, the common first, an older batch system, uses an oval tank called a beater. -
Sulfite: Here, There, Everywhere
Sulfite: Here, There, Everywhere Max T. Baker, PhD Associate Professor Department of Anesthesia University of Iowa Inadvertent Exposures Combustion of fossil fuels, Air pollutant Large quantities as sulfur dioxide are expelled from volcanos Kilauea on the Big Island Small quantities endogenously formed in mammals from sulfur-containing amino acid metabolism Deliberate Exposures As Preservative- Wine, Beer (dates to Roman times From burning sulfur candles) Fruits and Vegetables (reduce browning, extend shelf-life) Pharmaceuticals1 Reductant - Antioxidant - Antimicrobial What are Sulfites? Oxidized Forms of the Sulfur Atom Sulfur Dioxide, MW = 64, bp = - 10oC (gaseous) Sulfur (IV) - Oxidation state of 4 S = Atomic number 16 – electrons/shell, 2,8,6 Sodium Dioxide Readily Hydrates2 Sulfur Carbon Dioxide Dioxide (irritant) H O H2O 2 Sulfurous Unstable Carbonic low acid species acid pH high pH Bisulfite Bicarbonate anion anion Sulfite Carbonate dianion dianion Forms radical Doesn’t form radical Bisulfite Can Combine with SO2 to form Metabisulfite + excess Bisulfite Metabisulfite (disulfite, pyrosulfite) “Sulfite” usually added to drugs as sodium or potassium salts of: Sulfite, Bisulfite, or Metabisulfite Endogenous to Mammals Small quantities formed from sulfur-containing amino acid metabolism - cysteine, methionine3 + - + H2O + 2H + 2 e Sulfite Sulfate Rapidly detoxified by sulfite oxidase (SOX) to form sulfate – a two electron oxidation, molybdenum dependent Two Confirmed Sulfite Toxicities Neurological abnormalities from genetic sulfite oxidase deficiency3 Allergic reactions from exogenous exposure4 Oral, parenteral, inhalational exposure: dermatitis, urticaria, flushing, hypotension, abdominal pain and diarrhea to life- threatening anaphylactic and asthmatic reactions “The overall prevalence of sulfite sensitivity in the general population is unknown and probably low. Sulfite sensitivity is seen more frequently in asthmatic than in nonasthmatic people." - FDA Prevalence – 3-10% are sulfite sensitive among asthmatic subjects. -
Making Paper from Trees
Making Paper from Trees Forest Service U.S. Department of Agriculture FS-2 MAKING PAPER FROM TREES Paper has been a key factor in the progress of civilization, especially during the past 100 years. Paper is indispensable in our daily life for many purposes. It conveys a fantastic variety and volume of messages and information of all kinds via its use in printing and writing-personal and business letters, newspapers, pamphlets, posters, magazines, mail order catalogs, telephone directories, comic books, school books, novels, etc. It is difficult to imagine the modern world without paper. Paper is used to wrap packages. It is also used to make containers for shipping goods ranging from food and drugs to clothing and machinery. We use it as wrappers or containers for milk, ice cream, bread, butter, meat, fruits, cereals, vegetables, potato chips, and candy; to carry our food and department store purchases home in; for paper towels, cellophane, paper handkerchiefs and sanitary tissues; for our notebooks, coloring books, blotting paper, memo pads, holiday greeting and other “special occasion’’ cards, playing cards, library index cards; for the toy hats, crepe paper decorations, paper napkins, paper cups, plates, spoons, and forks for our parties. Paper is used in building our homes and schools-in the form of roofing paper, and as paperboard- heavy, compressed product made from wood pulp-which is used for walls and partitions, and in such products as furniture. Paper is also used in linerboard, “cardboard,” and similar containers. Wood pulp is the principal fibrous raw material from which paper is made, and over half of the wood cut in this country winds up in some form of paper products. -
Technological Innovations As a Competitive Advantage in Paper Industry
International Journal of Economics and Law, Vol. 4, No. 10 (2014) TECHNOLOGICAL INNOVATIONS AS A COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE IN PAPER INDUSTRY Knežević S. Rade Faculty of Strategic and Operational Management, Belgrade, Serbia [email protected] Mrdak Gordana Higher Professional School of Applied Studies, Vranje, Serbia Krgović Milorad Faculty of Technology and Metallurgy, University of Belgrade, Serbia Knežević Željko Novi Sad, Serbia Abstract: In the business development special place belongs to the technology, because it shows the influence of different factors that significantly impact the creation of competitive advantage of countries and companies within the world and the global economy. One of the main generators of competition are technological development and technological achievements. In the first part of the paper technical and technological development of the technology of paper to this day are represented chronologicaly,showing how certain ideas in a certain period can be revolutionary and useful for the development of technology. Through a practical example, with desire to improve the technological process, improve the quality of the final product, reduce production costs, achieve financial savings, achieve competitive advantage, et al., the actual impact of work on improving the technological process of the paper is given in this paper. Key words: paper, technology, innovation, constant part. 1. INTRODUCTION Modern business conditions impose the constancy of change and the adoption of the in- novation spirit as a business orientation of all market participants. Consequently, it leads to improvement of many business philosophies and creation of completely new ones, which are trying to respond to the challenges and obstacles of the turbulent environment. -
Lignin As a Source of Phenolic Compounds: from Lignin Extraction to Its Transformation by Different Routes
Lignin as a source of phenolic compounds: from lignin extraction to its transformation by different routes A dissertation presented by Javier Fernández Rodríguez In Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in Renewable Materials Engineering by the University of the Basque Country UPV/EHU Under the supervision of Dr. Jalel Labidi Dr. María González Alriols Chemical and Environmental Engineering Department Engineering School of Gipuzkoa Donostia-San Sebastián 2020 (c)2020 JAVIER FERNANDEZ RODRIGUEZ “Dalli qui nu canta, verdi qui nu livanta” II Summary In the last decades, considerable interest has been put in using lignocellulosic streams, which have been traditionally considered as wastes, to be converted into value-added products, such as fuel, chemicals and biomaterials, which are currently obtained from fossil sources. Lignin, the most plenty polymer as an aromatic source in nature has been traditionally considered as a by-product or side stream from pulp and paper process, although lignin commercialization as a source of phenolic compounds has gained more and more relevance lately. However, several drawbacks have to be still overcome, such as the high polydispersity and high content in impurities of the obtained lignin samples, which lead to generate a recalcitrant behavior that hinders its transformation processes into high value- added chemical compounds. Lignin-based products must be competitive with their petroleum-derived counterparts. Hence, it is very important to design energetically efficient processes for lignin extraction and purification. For this purpose, lignin-based products have to be assumed as a section of an integrated biorefinery where multiple products are obtained and in this line being able to compete in a realistic scenario. -
Semichemical and Sulfite Pulping Experiments and Production of Semichemical Corrugated Board from Red Gum (Liouidampar Styraciflua)
AGRICULTURE ROOM SEMICHEMICAL AND SULFITE PULPING EXPERIMENTS AND PRODUCTION OF SEMICHEMICAL CORRUGATED BOARD FROM RED GUM (LIOUIDAMPAR STYRACIFLUA) August 1939 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE FOREST SERVICE LFOREST—PRODUCTS LABORATORY L- Madison, Wisconsin In Cooperation with the University of Wisconsin SEMICEEMIC AL AND SULFITE PULPING EXPERIMENTS AND PRODUCTION OF SEMI- CHEMICAL CORRUGATED BOARD FROM RED GUM (LIQUIDAMBAR STYRACIFLUA) By G. H. CHIDESTER, Senior Engineer, and J. N. McGOVERN, Assistant Technologist Large quantities of red gum, among other hardwoods, are available in pulpwood size in various parts of the South. A. market for rid gum pulp- wood would provide an outlet for thinnings and cleanings to supplement its present use for lumber and be of material aid in improving forestry practice in many of these areas. The experiments reported here were made to determine the suita- bility of red gum for the manufacture of corrugating board, a high tonnage product in growing demand. Also, preliminary trials were made to furnish information on the suitability of the wood for sulphite pulp. For corru- gating board the semichemical pulping process, which has given a high yield of pulp suitable for this purpose from other hardwoods with a con- sequently low cost, was used. WOOD USED The sample of red gum (Liouidambax styraciflua) consisting of about 5 cords, supplied through the courtesy of the Arkansas State Forest Service, was cut in Prairie County, Arkansas. The stand was second growth and contained about 200 trees per acre, averaging 10 inches d.b.h. The properties reportegl for the wood are given in tables 1, 2, and 3. -
Pulp-Tester-Frank-PTI.Pdf
www.frank-pti.com OUR PRODUCTS DECADES OF EXPERIENCE IN PRODUCING QUALITY TESTING INSTRUMENTS MADE IN GERMANY PulpTester WITH INTEGRATED SAVINGS POTENTIAL In the area of pulp test instruments, FRANK-PTI has also succeeded in establishing itself as a leading all-range supplier on the international market. The reasons for this outstanding position are as numerous as easily understandable: • Excellent user-friendliness because of the ergonomic design • Use of high-quality materials in all assembled components • Extremely high reliability and longevity • Resistance against huge strain is a big advantage, especially with wet tests GREAT SAVINGS POTENTIAL THROUGH AUTOMATION Again and again human influences in manual measurements have led to inaccuracies. Variance of the measuring results can be high in cases where a measurement is repeated frequently. The high level of automation of our PulpTesters avoids this undesired phenome- non. These are the resulting advantages: • High level of standardisation • High reproducibility • Big savings potential because more accurate measurement values help you to avoid over- quality products and to reduce the scrap rate FOR STANDARDS-COMPLIANT MEASUREMENTS OF ü PULP ü PAPER ü BOARD ü TISSUE 1 LONGEVITY THROUGH TOP-QUALITY MATERIAL AND RUGGED DESIGN CONTENT S40110 PFI-MILL 4 S40120 JOKRO-MILL 6 S40130 LABORATORY BEAter “Valley” 8 S21000 LABORATORY REFINER LR40 10 S95568 DISINTEGRATOR 12 S95555 EQUALIZER 14 S95587 SCHOPPER-RIEGLER FREENESS TESTER 16 S41510 CANADIAN STANDARD FREENESS TESTER (CSF) 18 S95854 SHEET FORMER RAPID-KÖTHEN KWT 20 S95854 SHEET FORMER RAPID-KÖTHEN AUTOMATIC 22 S95854 SHEET FORMER RAPID-KÖTHEN MANUAL 24 S41523 SHEET FORMER ACC. TO TAPPI OR SCAN sEMIAUTOMATIC 26 S41523 SHEET FORMER ACC. -
ANDRITZ Annual Report 2005 Customer Projects 004 Pulp and Paper Business Area Brazil
GLOBAL DESTINATIONS Annual Report 2005 KEY FIGURES 2001-2005 OF THE ANDRITZ GROUP (IFRS) Financial Figures in MEUR 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 Order Intake 1,975 1,837 1,394 1,300 1,121 Order Backlog as of 31.12. 1,696 1,439 1,054 904 740 Sales 1,744 1,481 1,225 1,110 1,319 EBITDA1) 131 115 84 81 95 EBITA2) 107 93 63 59 68 Operating Result (EBIT) 107 76 49 45 55 Earnings before Taxes (EBT) 110 77 49 46 60 Net Income 80 54 31 28 37 Cash flow from Operating Activities 237 208 5 76 72 Capital Expenditure3) 27 29 21 23 24 Employees as of 31.12. (excluding apprentices) 5,943 5,314 4,771 4,601 4,545 Fixed assets 308 276 279 293 317 Current assets 1,083 877 688 617 625 Equity4) 329 277 239 229 240 Provisions 190 160 150 145 159 Liabilities 873 717 577 536 544 Balance sheet total 1,391 1,153 967 910 942 EBITDA margin (%) 7.5 7.8 6.9 7.3 7.2 EBITA margin (%) 6.1 6.3 5.1 5.3 5.2 EBIT margin (%) 6.1 5.1 4.0 4.1 4.2 Net Income/Sales (%) 4.6 3.6 2.5 2.5 2.8 ROE (%)5) 24.3 19.5 13.0 12.2 15.4 Equity Ratio (%) 23.6 24.0 24.7 25.2 25.5 EV6)/EBITDA 6.3 4.4 5.2 2.4 2.1 Depreciation/Sales (%) 1.4 1.5 1.7 2.0 2.0 Amortization/Sales (%) 0.0 1.1 1.2 1.2 1.0 Stock Exchange related Figures 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 Earnings per share (EUR) 6.13 4.13 2.26 2.04 2.82 Dividend per share (EUR) 2.07) 1.4 1.0 0.9 0.9 Payout ratio (%) 32.6 34.3 44.2 44.1 31.9 Equity attributable to shareholders per share (EUR) 25.0 20.7 18.0 17.2 19.3 Market Capitalization as of end of period (MEUR) 1,207.1 729.3 493.4 298.9 276.9 Share price at year-end (EUR) 92.85 56.10 37.95 22.99 21.30 Highest closing price (EUR) 92.85 56.50 37.95 28.00 23.50 Lowest closing price (EUR) 56.59 35.00 21.00 19.40 20.52 Notes [4] Equity: Total shareholders‘ equity incl.