DOCSLIB.ORG

SOCI{ATIS · ΕΤ Socraticorljm RELIQUIAE

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
SOCI{ATIS · ΕΤ Socraticorljm RELIQUIAE SOCI{ATIS · ΕΤ SOCRATICORlJM RELIQUIAE COL,I,EGIT, DISI'OSUIT, AI'l'AH.ATIBUS NOTISQUE INSTRUXIT GABRIELE GIANNANTONI VOLUMEN ΠΙ BIBUOPOLIS CONSPECTUS VOLUMINIS TERTII lNDEX UBRORUM pag. 3 lNDEX FONTIUM » 93 lNDEX NOMINUM » 239 Proprieta let teraria riservata ISBN 88-7088-2 Ι 5-2 Copyright © 1990 l,y «C.N.R., Centro dί studio del pensiero antico» diretto da GABRIEI,E GrANNANTONI INDEX LIBROKUM ADAMJ., The Republic of Plato, Edited with Critical Notes, Commentary and Appendices by J. Α., 2 voll., Cambridge Qniv. Press 1902 (rist. 1905-7, 1920-1); 2nd Edit. with Introd. by D.A. Rees, ibid. 1963. ADORNOF., La filosofia antica, 2 voll., Milano 1961-5. ADRADOSF.R., Politica cinica en las fabulas esόpicas, nelle pp. 413-26 di Filo­ logia e forme letterarie. Studi offerti a F. Della Corte, Univ. degli Studi di Urbino, 1987. ALFIERIV.E., Gli Atomisti. Frammenti e testimonianze, Bari 1926. ALLMANNΗ., Ueber die beste Erziehung. Zum Dialog « Kallias » des Sokrati­ kers Aischines, «Philologus», cxvr (1972) pp. 213-53. ALPERSJ., Hercules in bivio, diss. Goettingen 1912. ALTWEGGW., Zum Aias und Odysseus des Antisthenes, nelle pp. 52-61 di Ju­ venes dum sumus. Aufsatze zur klassischen Altertumswissenschaft der 49. Versammlung deutscher Philologen und Schulmanner zu Basel, dar­ gebracht von Mitgliedern des Baseler l<lassisch-philologischen Seminars aus den J ahren 1901-1907, Basel 1907. ALTWEGGW., «Berliner Philologische Wochenschrift», χχχπ (1913) coll. 708-10: recens. a Α. Bachmann, Aiax et Ulixes declamationes (1911). AMELUNGW., Notes on Representations of Socrates and Diogenes and other Cynics, «American Journal of Archaeology», xxxr (1927) pp. 281-96. ANASTASIR., Diog. Laert. VI 72, a p. 368 di Studi classici in onore di Quinti­ no Cataudella, vol. η, Catania 1972. ANDREAEΒ., 'Αντισθένης φιλόσοφος. Φυpόμαχος έποίε.ι, nelle pp. 40-8 di Ei­ kones. Studien zum griechischen und romischen Bildnis, Hans Jucker ge­ widmet, Bern 1980. ANDREOTTIR., Per una critica dell'ideologia di Alessandro Magno, «Historia», ν (1956) pp. 257-302. ANGELIΑ., Ι frammenti di Idomeneo di Lampsaco, «Cronache Ercolanesi», ΧΙ (1981) pp. 41-101. ANGELIΑ., Filodemo: le altre opere, nelle pp. 585-633 di Συζήτησις. Studi sul­ l'epicureismo greco e romano offerti α Μ. Gigante, vol. η, Napoli 1983. ANGSTLΗ., Bemerkungen zu Jules Vuillemin, die Aporie des Meistersc!Jlusses von Diodoros Kronos und ihre Losungen, in ΑΖΡ 10.2 (1985), «Allge­ meine Zeitschrift fίir Philosophie», ΧΙ, 3 (1986) pp. 79-82. ΙΝηΕΧ l.IBRORUM 5 4 INDEX UΒΙωΙΗJΜ ARNIM Η. VON, s.v. Dionysios (η. 119) ίη RE vol. ν 1 (1903) coll. 973-4. ANTONIAnESΕ., Ari.,tipp und rlie Kyrenaiker, ι1iss. Goettingen 1916. ARNIM Η. VON, Zu den c;edichten de.s Kerkidas, « Wiener Studien», χχχιν ΑΡαΤ Ο., Beitrά'ge zur Geschic.hte der griechischen Philosophie, Leipzίg 1891. (1912) pp. 1-2Ί. Αι>ΕΙ.Τ Ο., Stilρon, «H.lιeinisches Mιιseum», υπ (1898) pρ. 621-5. ARNIM Η. VON, s.v. Hipparcf;ia (η. 1) in RE vol. νπr 2 (1913) col. 1662. ΑΡΕΙ.Τ Ο., «Ber-liner Pt1ilologiscl1e Woctienschrift», xxr (1901) coll. 867-72: ARNIM VON, vol. coll. l'ecens. a Κ. Joel, Der echte und der xerιophontische Sokrates, vol. π Η. s.v. Hiρpobotos, ίη RE VΙΠ 2 (1913) 1722-3. (1901). ARNIM Η. νοΝ, JJ!atos Jugenddialoge und die Entstehungszeit des Phaidros, APELT Ο., Platonische Aufsiitze, ιepzig 1912. Leipzig 1914. · APELT Ο., Diogenes Laertius. Leben und Meinungen beriihmter Philosop/Jen, ARNIM Η. VON, s.v. Kleomenes (η. 12) ίη RE vol. xr 1 (1921) col. 712. ubersetzt und erlautert von Ο. Α., 2 Bde, Leipzig 1921. Zweite Aufla­ ΑRΙιΙGΗΕΤΤΙ G., Epicuro. Opere, Introduzione, testo critico, traduzione e no­ ge, ιιnter Mitarbeit von H.G. Zecl, neu tieι·ausgegeben sowie Vorwort, te di G. Α., Torino 1960; 2.a ediz., ibid. 1973. Einleitung und nenen Anmerkιιngen versehen von Κ. Reich, ibid. 1967. ARmGHETTI G., Satiro. Vita di Euripide («Studi Classici e Orientali», 13), Pisa 1964. APFEL V.H., Hoιneric Critiι·istn in the fourth Century B.C., «Transactions and Pωceedings of American l1hilological Association», ι.χrχ (1938) pp. AsMUS J.R., Gregorius von Nazianz und sein Verhά'ltnis· zum Kynismus. Eine 245 ..58. ρatristisch-theologische Studie, «Theologische Sωdien und Kritiken», LXVII (1894) pp. 314-39. API'LEGATER., The Alcibiades of Aischines of Sphettos, Princeton Unίversity 1948. ATTRIDGEH.W., First-Century Cynicism in the Epistle of Heraclitus. Introduc­ tion, Greek• Text and Translation («Harvard Theological Studies», 29), ARDIZZONIΑ., Il saggio felice tra i tormenti, «Rivista di Filologia e di Istru .. Missonla (Montana), 1976. zίone Classica», η. s. χχ (1942) pρ. 81-102. AuBENQUE Ρ., Le probleme de l'etre chez Aristote. Essai sur la problematique ARGENIO·R., Parassiti e cuochi nelle commedie di Alessi, «Rivista di Stndi aristotelicienne, Paris 1962. Classici», χπ (1964) pp. 23'7-55 e ΧΙΙΙ (1965) pp. 5-22. AuBENQUE Ρ., La prudence chez Aristote, Paris 1963. ARNIM Η. VON, Entstεhung und Anordnung der &hri/tensammlt-ιng Dios von Pι·usa, «Hermes», xxvr (1891) pρ. 366-407. AuBINEAU Μ., Le theme du bourbier· dans la litterature grecque ρrofane et chre­ ARNIM Η. VON, Ein Bruchstiick des Alexino.s, «I-Iermes», xxvrn (1893) pp. tienne, «Recherches de Science Religieuse», XLVII (1959) pp. 185-214. 65-Ί2. AusFELn R., De libro Περί του πάντα σπουοαϊον είναι έλεύθερον qui inter Philo­ ARNIM Ι-ι νοΝ, Dionis Pι"Usaen.sis quem voι·ant C'hrysostomΙ.Jm qttae extant om­ nis Alexandrini oρera fertur, diss. Goettingen 1887. nia, edidit, apparatn critico instrux.it J. cle Α., Berolini, 2 vol!., 1893- ΒΑΒΕΙ,ΟΝ J., Diogene le cynique, «Revue Nιιmismatίqιιe», xvnr (1914) pp. lR96. 14-19. ARNIM Η. VON, s·.v. Alexinos ίη RE vol. Ι (1894) coll. 1465-6. BABELONJ., La monnaie de Diogene, «Bulletin de la Societe Nationale des ARNIM Η. VON, I.v. Antipatrω (η. 25) ίη R.E vol. Ι 2 (1894) col. 2515. Antiquaires de France» (1933) pp. 179-80. ARNIM Η. VON, s.v. Aρollonios (η. 95) in 1<..Ε vol. η 1 (1895) col. 146. BABUT D., Plutarque. De la vertu ethique, Introduction, texte, tradιιction et commentaire par D. Β., Paris 1969. ARNIM Η. VON, .1.v. Aristiρρos (η. 10) in RE vol. η 1 (1895) col. 906. / BABUT D., Plutarque et le Stoϊcisme, Paris 1969. ARNIM Η. VON, s.υ. Bion (η. 10) in RE vo1. ΠΙ 1 (1897) coll. 483-5. BACHMANNΑ., Aiax et Ulixes declamationes utrum iure tribuantur Antistheni ARNIM Η. VON, Leben und Werke des Dio von Prusa, mit einer Einleitnng: necne, diss. Muenster ί. W. 1911. Sophistik Rhetorik T>hilosophie in ihrem Kampf um die Jugendbildung, Berlin 1898. BAERTHLEINΚ., Untersuchungen zur aristotelischen Modaltheorie, «Archiv fίir Geschichte der Philosophie», XLV (1963) pp. 43-67. ARNIM Η. VON, s.v. Demetriω (η. 88) ίη RE vol. rv 1 (1901) col. 2842. 6 INDEXLIBRORUM INDEXLIBRORUM 7 BAEUMKERC:., Ueber den Sophisten Polyxenos, «Rheinisches Museum», BεcKER Ο., Zwei Untersuchungen zur antiken Logik («Klassisch-Philologische XXXIV(1879) pp. 64-83. Studien», Heft 17), Wiesbaden 1957. ' BAHNSCHF., Quaestionum de Diogenis Laertii fontibus initia, Gumbinnae Βεκκειt Ι., Platonische Scholi&'n,Berolini 1823. (diss. Regimont.) 1868. BENTLEYR., Dissertations upon the Epistles of Phalaris, Themistoc!es, Socrates, BALDASSARRIL., Sui papiri ercolanesi 495 e 558, «C:ronache Ercolanesi», νΙ Euripides and upon the Fables of Aesop, edited with an Introduction and (1976) pp. 77-80. Notes by W. Wagner, Berlin 1874. BALDRYH.C:., Zeno's Idea! State, «Journal of Hellenic Studies», LXXIX BERGKΤΗ., Poetae Lyrici Graeci (3 voll., Lipsiae 1841). Pars π: Poetas elegia- (1959) pp. 3-15. cos et iambographos continens, Lipsiae 19154 . BALDRYH.C:., The Idea of the Unity of Mankind, nelle pp. 167-204 dί Grecs BERGKΤΗ., Fiinf Abhandlungen zur Geschichte der griechischen Philosophie und et Barbares («Entretiens sur l'Antiquite c:Iassique», Fondation Hardt, Astronomie, Leipzig 1883. νπr), V andoeuvres-Geneve 1962. BERNAYSJ., Lucian und die Kyniker, mit einer Uebersetzung der Schrift Lu­ BALDRYH.C:., The Unity of Mankind in Greek Thought, C:ambridge Univ. cίans ίiber das Lebensende des Peregrinus, Berlin 1879. Press 1965. Trad. ital., Bologna 1983. BERNAYSJ ., Phokion und seine neueren Beurtheiler. Ein Beitrag zur Geschichte BANNERTΗ., Numismatisches zu Biographie und Lehre des Hundes Diogenes, der griechischen Philosophie und Politik, Berlin 1881. «Litterae Numismaticae Vindobonenses», Ι (1979) pp. 49-63. BERNAYSJ., Gesammelte Abhandlungen, hrsg. von Η. Usener, 2 Bde, Berlin BARBIERIΑ., Aristotele e l'edonismo di Eudosso, «Giornale C:ritico della Filo­ 1885. sofia Italiana», xxxrn (1954) pp. 509-17. BεRNAYS J., Theophrastos' Schrift iiber die Frommigkeit, Είη Beitrag zur Re­ BARIGAZZIΑ., Epicarmo e !α figura di Ulisse ησυχος, «Rheinisches Museum», ligionsgeschichte mit kritischen und erklarenden Bemerkungen zu XCVIII(1955) pp. 121-35. Porphyrios' Schrift ίiber Enthaltsamkeit, Berlin 1886. BARIGAZZIΑ., Note α! De exilio di Telete e di Musonio, « Studi Italiani di Fi- BERNHARDYG., Eratosthenica, Berolini 1822. lologia c:Iassica», xxxrv (1962) pp. 70-82. BεRNOULLI J.J., Griechische Ikonographie, mit Ausschluss Akxander und der BARIGAZZIΑ., Favorino. Opere, Firenze 1966. Diadochen, 2 Bde, Mίinchen 1901. BARLENΚ., Antisthenes und Plato, Progr. des Gymn., Neuwied 1881. BERRYE.G., The Oxyrhinchus Fragments of Aeschines of Sphettus, «Transac­ tions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association», LXXXI BARNERG., Comparantur inter se Graeci de regentium hominum virtutibus (1950) pp. 1-8. auctores, diss. Marburg 1889. ΒεRΤΙ Ε., La critica allo scetticismo nel IV libro de!la 'Metafisica ', nelle pp. 61- (BARNESJ.), Editor's Notes, « Phronesis », χχχπ (1987) pp. 365-6. 79 di Lo scetticismo antico, a cura di G. Giannantoni, vol. 1, Napoli 1981. BARNSJ., Α New Gnomologium, «c:Iassical Quarterly», XLIV(1950) pp. 126- 37 e XLV(1951) pp. 1-19. ΒεRΤΙΝΙ MALGARINIΑ., Aristonymos e/o Aristone di Chio, «Elenchos», η (1981) pp. 147-59. BARTALUCCIΑ., Una probabile ricostruzione de!!Έrac!e di Diogene di Sinope, «Studi c:Iassici e Orientali», xrx-xx (1970-1971) pp. 109-22.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Simon the Shoemaker
    SIMON THE SHOEMAKER John Sellars 1399 3RD AVENUE -MANHATTAN- SIMON SHOE REPAIR -1- The name “Simon the Shoemaker” is not one im- mediately familiar to specialists in ancient philoso- 1 phy, let alone to students of philosophy in general. This may well be due, in part, to the tendency of many scholars both past and present to deny his historical reality altogether. Ancient sources refer to a Simon who, it is said, was an associate of Socrates and who ran a shoe shop on the edge of the Athenian agora where Socrates used to come to engage in philosophical discussions with Simon while he worked.2 However, the fact that neither Plato nor Xenophon mentions Simon has often been cited as an argument against his very existence. Moreover, it is reported that the Socratic philosopher Phaedo wrote a dialogue entitled Simon, and thus it has been sug- gested that the later “Simon legend” derived ultimately from a literary character created by Phaedo.3 The situation has somewhat changed since the discovery of the remains of a shop near the Tholos on the southwestern edge of the agora, the floor scattered with hobnails, containing a base from a pot with the word “Simon’s” inscribed upon it.4 Ar- chaeologists commenting upon this discovery have been keen to identify its owner with the Simon mentioned in the literary sources as a companion of Socrates, but scholars primarily concerned with ancient philosophy have tended to remain doubtful.5 Simon’s reputation relies principally upon the claim made by Diogenes Laertius that Simon was the first to write “Socratic dialogues.”6 Diogenes reports that these were also known as “shoemaker’s dialogues” or simply “shoemaker’s.” These, Diogenes says, were notes of actual conversations that Simon had had with Socrates rather than literary compositions.
    [Show full text]
  • A History of Cynicism
    A HISTORY OF CYNICISM Downloaded from https://www.holybooks.com Downloaded from https://www.holybooks.com A HISTORY OF CYNICISM From Diogenes to the 6th Century A.D. by DONALD R. DUDLEY F,llow of St. John's College, Cambrid1e Htmy Fellow at Yale University firl mll METHUEN & CO. LTD. LONDON 36 Essex Street, Strand, W.C.2 Downloaded from https://www.holybooks.com First published in 1937 PRINTED IN GREAT BRITAIN Downloaded from https://www.holybooks.com PREFACE THE research of which this book is the outcome was mainly carried out at St. John's College, Cambridge, Yale University, and Edinburgh University. In the help so generously given to my work I have been no less fortunate than in the scenes in which it was pursued. I am much indebted for criticism and advice to Professor M. Rostovtseff and Professor E. R. Goodonough of Yale, to Professor A. E. Taylor of Edinburgh, to Professor F. M. Cornford of Cambridge, to Professor J. L. Stocks of Liverpool, and to Dr. W. H. Semple of Reading. I should also like to thank the electors of the Henry Fund for enabling me to visit the United States, and the College Council of St. John's for electing me to a Research Fellowship. Finally, to• the unfailing interest, advice and encouragement of Mr. M. P. Charlesworth of St. John's I owe an especial debt which I can hardly hope to repay. These acknowledgements do not exhaust the list of my obligations ; but I hope that other kindnesses have been acknowledged either in the text or privately.
    [Show full text]
  • Universidade Do Estado Do Rio De Janeiro Centro De Ciências Sociais Instituto De Filosofia E Ciências Humanas
    Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro Centro de Ciências Sociais Instituto de Filosofia e Ciências Humanas Luis Filipe Bantim de Assumpção Discurso e Representação sobre as práticas rituais dos esparciatas e dos seus basileus na Lacedemônia, do século V a.C Rio de Janeiro 2014 Luis Filipe Bantim de Assumpção Discurso e representação sobre as práticas rituais dos esparciatas e dos seus basileus na Lacedemônia, do século V a.C Dissertação apresentada, como requisito para a obtenção do título de Mestre, ao Programa de Pós-Graduação em História, da Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro. Área de concentração: História Política. Orientadora: Profª. Dra. Maria Regina Candido. Rio de Janeiro 2014 CATALOGAÇÃO NA FONTE UERJ/REDE SIRIUS/ BIBLIOTECA CCS/A A851 Assumpção, Luis Felipe Bantim Discurso e representação sobre as práticas rituais dos esparciatas e dos seus basileus na Lacedemônia do século V a.C /Luis Felipe Bantim Assumpção. – 2014. 284 f. Orientadora: Maria Regina Candido. Dissertação (mestrado) - Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Instituto de Filosofia e Ciências Humanas. Bibliografia. 1. História antiga – Teses. 2. Civilização clássica - Teses. I.Candido, Maria Regina. II. Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro. Instituto de Filosofia e Ciências Humanas. III. Título. CDU 931 Autorizo apenas para fins acadêmicos e científicos, a reprodução total ou parcial desta dissertação, desde que citada a fonte. _____________________________________ ___________________________ Assinatura Data Luis Filipe Bantim de Assumpção Discurso e Representação sobre as práticas rituais dos esparciatas e dos seus basileus na Lacedemônia, do século V a.C Dissertação apresentada, como requisito parcial para obtenção do título de Mestre, ao Programa de Pós-Graduação em História, da Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro.
    [Show full text]
  • The Recollections of Encolpius
    The Recollections of Encolpius ANCIENT NARRATIVE Supplementum 2 Editorial Board Maaike Zimmerman, University of Groningen Gareth Schmeling, University of Florida, Gainesville Heinz Hofmann, Universität Tübingen Stephen Harrison, Corpus Christi College, Oxford Costas Panayotakis (review editor), University of Glasgow Advisory Board Jean Alvares, Montclair State University Alain Billault, Université Jean Moulin, Lyon III Ewen Bowie, Corpus Christi College, Oxford Jan Bremmer, University of Groningen Ken Dowden, University of Birmingham Ben Hijmans, Emeritus of Classics, University of Groningen Ronald Hock, University of Southern California, Los Angeles Niklas Holzberg, Universität München Irene de Jong, University of Amsterdam Bernhard Kytzler, University of Natal, Durban John Morgan, University of Wales, Swansea Ruurd Nauta, University of Groningen Rudi van der Paardt, University of Leiden Costas Panayotakis, University of Glasgow Stelios Panayotakis, University of Groningen Judith Perkins, Saint Joseph College, West Hartford Bryan Reardon, Professor Emeritus of Classics, University of California, Irvine James Tatum, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire Alfons Wouters, University of Leuven Subscriptions Barkhuis Publishing Zuurstukken 37 9761 KP Eelde the Netherlands Tel. +31 50 3080936 Fax +31 50 3080934 [email protected] www.ancientnarrative.com The Recollections of Encolpius The Satyrica of Petronius as Milesian Fiction Gottskálk Jensson BARKHUIS PUBLISHING & GRONINGEN UNIVERSITY LIBRARY GRONINGEN 2004 Bókin er tileinkuð
    [Show full text]
  • Traces of Cynic Monotheism in the Early Roman Empire*
    ACTA CIASSICA LI (2008) 1-20 ISSN 0065-1141 ARTICLES • ARTIKELS TRACES OF CYNIC MONOTHEISM IN THE EARLY ROMAN EMPIRE* P.R. Bosman Univel sity of South Africa ABSTRACT The ancient Cynics rejected traditional religion, themselves on first appearances endorsing either atheism or agnosticism. But their criticism may also have stemmed from a radical monotheism as voiced by Antisthenes. After briefly discussing imperial Cynics and their views on religion, the article argues that the 4th letter of Pseudo-Heraclitus and the Geneva Papyrus inv. 271, Cynic texts from the Early Empire, are not contrary to the essentials of the philosophy and may represent late Hellenistic forms of the Antisthenic tradition in portraying Cynic-type sages mediating between humankind and the God of nature. Introduction Cynic philosophy's roots go back to the 4th century BC, but it experienced a revival approximately simultaneous with the dramatic rise of Christianity. The two movements had much in common, not least their shared criticism of traditional Greco-Roman religion. 1 Two fundamental forces driving early Christian rejection of popular religion were belief in the one God of Judaism and a close association of his will with the rules for righteous living. It may be asked whether anything similar can be found in the Cynicism of that era. Some sources indeed suggest that the Cynics - traditionally focussing exclusively on ethics - were prepared to link their way of life to belief in a single God who provides or communicates the principles of correct conduct to the Cynic sage.2 * I wish to thank the referees of Acta Classica for valuable comments and corrections to this text.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Name 2 Zeus in Myth
    Zeus For other uses, see Zeus (disambiguation). Zeus (English pronunciation: /ˈzjuːs/[3] ZEWS); Ancient Greek Ζεύς Zeús, pronounced [zdeǔ̯s] in Classical Attic; Modern Greek: Δίας Días pronounced [ˈði.as]) is the god of sky and thunder and the ruler of the Olympians of Mount Olympus. The name Zeus is cognate with the first element of Roman Jupiter, and Zeus and Jupiter became closely identified with each other. Zeus is the child of Cronus and Rhea, and the youngest of his siblings. In most traditions he is married to Hera, although, at the oracle of Dodona, his consort The Chariot of Zeus, from an 1879 Stories from the Greek is Dione: according to the Iliad, he is the father of Tragedians by Alfred Church. Aphrodite by Dione.[4] He is known for his erotic es- capades. These resulted in many godly and heroic offspring, including Athena, Apollo, Artemis, Hermes, the Proto-Indo-European god of the daytime sky, also [10][11] Persephone (by Demeter), Dionysus, Perseus, Heracles, called *Dyeus ph2tēr (“Sky Father”). The god is Helen of Troy, Minos, and the Muses (by Mnemosyne); known under this name in the Rigveda (Vedic San- by Hera, he is usually said to have fathered Ares, Hebe skrit Dyaus/Dyaus Pita), Latin (compare Jupiter, from and Hephaestus.[5] Iuppiter, deriving from the Proto-Indo-European voca- [12] tive *dyeu-ph2tēr), deriving from the root *dyeu- As Walter Burkert points out in his book, Greek Religion, (“to shine”, and in its many derivatives, “sky, heaven, “Even the gods who are not his natural children address [10] [6] god”).
    [Show full text]
  • Pausanias' Description of Greece
    BONN'S CLASSICAL LIBRARY. PAUSANIAS' DESCRIPTION OF GREECE. PAUSANIAS' TRANSLATED INTO ENGLISH \VITTI NOTES AXD IXDEX BY ARTHUR RICHARD SHILLETO, M.A., Soiiii'tinie Scholar of Trinity L'olltge, Cambridge. VOLUME IT. " ni <le Fnusnnias cst un homme (jui ne mnnquo ni de bon sens inoins a st-s tlioux." hnniie t'oi. inais i}iii rn>it ou au voudrait croire ( 'HAMTAiiNT. : ftEOROE BELL AND SONS. YOUK STIIKKT. COVKNT (iAKDKX. 188t). CHISWICK PRESS \ C. WHITTINGHAM AND CO., TOOKS COURT, CHANCEKV LANE. fA LC >. iV \Q V.2- CONTEXTS. PAGE Book VII. ACHAIA 1 VIII. ARCADIA .61 IX. BtEOTIA 151 -'19 X. PHOCIS . ERRATA. " " " Volume I. Page 8, line 37, for Atte read Attes." As vii. 17. 2<i. (Catullus' Aft is.) ' " Page 150, line '22, for Auxesias" read Anxesia." A.-> ii. 32. " " Page 165, lines 12, 17, 24, for Philhammon read " Philanimon.'' " " '' Page 191, line 4, for Tamagra read Tanagra." " " Pa ire 215, linu 35, for Ye now enter" read Enter ye now." ' " li I'aijf -J27, line 5, for the Little Iliad read The Little Iliad.'- " " " Page ^S9, line 18, for the Babylonians read Babylon.'' " 7 ' Volume II. Page 61, last line, for earth' read Earth." " Page 1)5, line 9, tor "Can-lira'" read Camirus." ' ; " " v 1'age 1 69, line 1 , for and read for. line 2, for "other kinds of flutes "read "other thites.'' ;< " " Page 201, line 9. for Lacenian read Laeonian." " " " line 10, for Chilon read Cliilo." As iii. 1H. Pago 264, " " ' Page 2G8, Note, for I iad read Iliad." PAUSANIAS. BOOK VII. ACIIAIA.
    [Show full text]
  • The Differing Journeys Through Childhood in Ancient Athens and Sparta
    Growing up Greek: The differing journeys through childhood in ancient Athens and Sparta Elizabeth Ann Robertson Thesis presented in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in the Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences at Stellenbosch University Supervisor: Dr Samantha Masters March 2018 Stellenbosch University https://scholar.sun.ac.za Declaration By submitting this thesis electronically, I declare that the entirety of the work therein is my own, that I am the sole author thereof (save to the extent explicitly otherwise stated), that reproduction and publication thereof by Stellenbosch University will not infringe any third party rights and that I have not previously in its entirety or in part submitted it for obtaining any qualification. Date: March 2018 Elizabeth Ann Robertson Copyright © 2017 Stellenbosch University All rights reserved Stellenbosch University https://scholar.sun.ac.za Abstract Athens and Sparta were the two most prominent city-states during the 6th and 5th centuries BCE, but their socio-political systems differed markedly. As a result of such radical differences it could be hypothesised that the childhoods and, in particular, the education and socialisation of children, would also differ. The aims of this thesis are: 1. to examine the extent and nature of the differences between the childhood experiences of each group of children from the two city-states, Athens and Sparta, in particular the type of education and socialisation system to which each was exposed; and 2. to discern to what extent and in what way the socio-political system of their respective state had an impact on their upbringing and their journey to adult citizen status.
    [Show full text]
  • Cynicism As a Way of Life: from the Classical Cynic to a New Cynicism
    Akropolis 1 (2017) 33–54 Dennis Schutijser* Cynicism as a way of life: From the Classical Cynic to a New Cynicism Introduction Both within and outside the world of academic philosophy, art of living has been increasingly in the spotlight. Objectives such as success, pleasure and happi- ness are expressly validated in contemporary society, but more philosophically val- id objectives such as cultivation of the soul also receive ample attention. On the other side, within academic philosophy, the question for the art of living has also been receiving increasing attention.1 This revival could arguably be led back to Mi- chel Foucault’s genealogical return to antiquity in the second and third parts of his History of Sexuality, in turn undoubtedly influenced by the works of Pierre Hadot. Especially classical philosophy has proven a rich source of investigation and inspi- ration for a philosophy of the art of living. Many currents in ancient philosophy ac- tually proposed different ways of living, based on different values and articulated in different practices.2 One of the central currents throughout a large part of antiquity was Cyn- icism. This school is accompanied with a number of methodological difficulties. Not least of all, today’s connotation of the name Cynicism is radically different from its classical origins. Today, being a cynic is associated with a depreciative at- titude, intended to insult and offend, rather than being concerned with any phil- osophical foundation. A further complication is that little is known directly of classical Cynicism, and what we do know often comes from anecdotes and stories written down by posterity, and not from actual first hand sources of substantial profundity.
    [Show full text]
  • New and Old Panathenaic Victor Lists
    NEW AND OLD PANATHENAIC VICTOR LISTS (PLATES71-76) I. THE NEW PANATHENAIC VICTOR LISTS FINDSPOT, DESCRIPTION, AND TEXT The present inscription (pp. 188-189) listing athletic victors in the Panathenaia first came to my attention a number of years ago by word of mouth.1 I do not have accurate information about its initial discovery. The stone was initially under the jurisdiction of Dr. George Dontas, who helped me gain accessto it and determinethat no one was working on it. My own interest in the inscriptionin the first place stemmedfrom the hand. With the assistance of the Greek authorities, especially the two (former) directorsof the Akropolis, G. Dontas and E. Touloupa, whose generous cooperationI gratefully acknowledge,I have been granted permission to publish this important inscription.2In October of 1989 I was able to study the text in situ and also to make a squeeze and photographs.3 I In a joint article it is particularly important to indicate who did what. In this case Stephen Tracy has primary responsibilityfor section I, Christian Habicht for section II, and both authors for IV; section III is subdividedinto parts A, B, and C: Tracy is the primary author of A and B and Habicht of C. Nevertheless, this article is the product of close collaboration.Although initially we worked independently,each of us has read and commentedon the other's work. The final draft representsa version agreed upon by both authors. Photographs:Pls. 71-75, SVT; P1. 76, Tameion ArcheologikonPoron. All dates are B.C., unless otherwise stated. Works frequently cited are abbreviatedas follows: Agora XV = B.
    [Show full text]
  • The Invisibility of Juvenal James Uden Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of Th
    The Invisibility of Juvenal James Uden Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY 2011 2011 James Uden All rights reserved. ABSTRACT The Invisibility of Juvenal James Uden This dissertation offers a reading of Juvenal’s Satires. It maintains that Juvenal consciously frustrates readers’ attempts to identify his poetic voice with a single unitary character or persona. At the same time, it argues that Juvenal’s poems are influenced in both form and theme by cultural trends in the early second century. The arguments staged in these poems constitute a critique of aspects of Roman intellectual culture in the reigns of Trajan and Hadrian. Contents Preface 1. Provoking the Charge: Epic Poet and Reticent Informer in Satire One The Recitation Hall (Part One) The Paradox of Contemporary Epic The Satirist as Delator The Crisis of Criticism Satiric Voices in Tacitus’ Dialogus de Oratoribus The Recitation Hall (Part Two) 2. The Invisibility of Juvenal ‘Atopic Topology’: The Thirteenth Oration of Dio Chrysostom Juvenal’s Second Satire: Strategies for Speech and Disguise Secrecy and Violence in Satire Nine 3. Satire Four: Playing the Panegyrist The Art of Exaggeration The Emperor over Nature Natural Reversal and Fish Savagery The Perils of Panegyrical Speech i 4. Cynic Philosophy and Ethical Education in Satires Ten and Fourteen Debasing the Coinage The Laugh of Democritus and the Cynic Ideal Satire Fourteen: The Domestication of Ethical Teaching 5. Satire Twelve: Repetition and Sacrifice in Hadrianic Rome Horatian Ritual and the “New Augustus” Substitution and Sacrifice: Animals and Humans in Satire Twelve The Gods and their Captatores Reading across Books: Atheism and Superstition in Satire Thirteen Appendix: Martial 12.18 and the Dating of Juvenal’s First Book ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Thanks must go first to Gareth Williams, friend and mentor for the past half-decade.
    [Show full text]
  • Reading 1 Corinthians with the Augustan Marriage Laws
    Paul on Marriage and Singleness: Reading 1 Corinthians with the Augustan Marriage Laws by David Alan Reed A thesis submitted to the Faculty of Theology of the University of St. Michael’s College and the Biblical Department of the Toronto School of Theology in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Theology awarded by the University of St. Michael’s College © David Alan Reed 2013 Paul on Marriage and Singleness: Reading 1 Corinthians 7 with the Augustan Marriage Laws David Wheeler-Reed Doctor of Philosophy in Theology University of St. Michael’s College 2013 Abstract This thesis examines what happens if Paul’s directives to married and single persons in 1 Corinthians 7 are read in light of Corinth’s Roman cultural context. It seeks to make analogical comparisons between Paul’s directives in 1 Corinthians 7 and the Augustan Marriage Laws known as the Lex Iulia and Lex Papipa Poppaea. When Paul’s directives are read with the Augustan marriage laws, a very complex picture of Paul develops. First of all, against “empire- critical” readers of Paul, the apostle is not entirely against all aspects of the Roman empire. Instead, this thesis demonstrates that as a colonized individual himself, Paul was a “hybrid” figure, who simultaneously borrowed from and fought against many of the ideas of Roman imperialism. Second, this work shows that when Paul disagreed with the Augustan marriage legislation, he did so mainly with respect to what it had to say about widows. In fact, Paul’s directives to widows are very similar to the thoughts of many other Roman moralists in the first- century CE.
    [Show full text]