DOCSLIB.ORG

Eastern North Carolina Regional Freight Mobility Plan Final Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Eastern North Carolina Regional Freight Mobility Plan Final Report Eastern North Carolina Regional Freight Mobility Plan Final Report prepared for Greenville Urban Area Metropolitan Planning Organization prepared by Cambridge Systematics, Inc. with Baseline Mobility Group, Inc. Kimley-Horn & Associates Cherry Consulting of the Carolinas, Inc. October 31, 2019 www.camsys.com final plan Eastern North Carolina Regional Freight Mobility Plan Final Report prepared for Greenville Urban Area Metropolitan Planning Organization prepared by Cambridge Systematics, Inc. 1201 Edwards Mill Road, Suite 130 Raleigh, NC 27607 with Baseline Mobility Group, Inc. Kimley-Horn & Associates Cherry Consulting of the Carolinas, Inc. date October 31, 2019 (Note: Revisions Adopted June 14, 2020) Eastern North Carolina Regional Freight Mobility Plan Table of Contents Executive Summary .................................................................................................................................... ES-1 Stakeholder Outreach ........................................................................................................................ ES-1 Regional Goods Movement Profile .................................................................................................... ES-2 Highway Profile ........................................................................................................................ ES-2 Railroad Profile ........................................................................................................................ ES-3 Maritime Profile ........................................................................................................................ ES-3 Air Cargo Profile ....................................................................................................................... ES-4 Pipeline Profile ......................................................................................................................... ES-4 Economic and Industry Supply Chain Profile ..................................................................................... ES-4 Population Trends .................................................................................................................... ES-4 Employment Trends ................................................................................................................. ES-4 Commodity Flow and Economic Futures ........................................................................................... ES-6 Commodity Flow Profile ........................................................................................................... ES-6 County Level Trade..................................................................................................... ES-7 Economic Futures and Trends ................................................................................................. ES-8 Rail-Related Developments ........................................................................................ ES-8 Development Plans for North Carolina Global TransPark (NCGTP) .......................... ES-9 Logistics Freight Market Assessment ................................................................................................ ES-9 SWOT Analysis ........................................................................................................................ ES-9 Cargo-Oriented Development Opportunities and Requirements ...........................................ES-10 SWOT Findings ......................................................................................................................ES-11 Needs Assessment ..........................................................................................................................ES-11 Key Findings ..........................................................................................................................ES-11 Summary Findings and Recommendations .....................................................................................ES-12 Freight Policy Findings and Recommendations ....................................................................ES-12 Highway and Bridge Findings and Recommendations ..........................................................ES-13 Rail Infrastructure Findings and Recommendations ..............................................................ES-14 Port Findings and Recommendations ....................................................................................ES-14 Airport Findings and Recommendations................................................................................ES-15 Freight and Logistics Findings and Recommendations .........................................................ES-16 1.0 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................ 1-1 1.1 Eastern North Carolina Region .................................................................................................. 1-1 1.2 Organization of the Report ......................................................................................................... 1-2 2.0 Stakeholder Outreach ........................................................................................................................ 2-1 Cambridge Systematics, Inc. i Eastern North Carolina Regional Freight Mobility Plan 2.1 Regional Freight Advisory Council ............................................................................................. 2-1 2.2 Focus Groups ............................................................................................................................ 2-3 2.3 Freight and Industry Stakeholder Interviews ............................................................................. 2-3 2.4 Freight Mobility Survey .............................................................................................................. 2-4 2.5 Summary .................................................................................................................................... 2-5 3.0 Regional Goods Movement Profile ................................................................................................... 3-1 3.1 Data and Methodology ............................................................................................................... 3-1 3.2 Highway/Trucking Profile ........................................................................................................... 3-1 3.2.1 Regional Priority Highway Freight Network .................................................................. 3-1 3.2.2 System Use and Demand ............................................................................................. 3-4 3.2.3 System Performance .................................................................................................... 3-4 Level of Service ............................................................................................................ 3-4 Safety ............................................................................................................................ 3-4 At-Grade Crossings ...................................................................................................... 3-4 Highway-Rail Accidents ................................................................................................ 3-4 Pavement Conditions .................................................................................................... 3-4 Bridge Conditions.......................................................................................................... 3-5 Future Interstate Highways ........................................................................................... 3-8 3.3 Railroad Profile ........................................................................................................................ 3-10 3.3.1 Railroad System .......................................................................................................... 3-10 3.3.2 System Use and Demand ........................................................................................... 3-13 3.3.3 Level of Service .......................................................................................................... 3-15 3.3.4 Trends and Implications for Rail Growth..................................................................... 3-17 3.4 Marine Port Profile ................................................................................................................... 3-18 3.4.1 Inventory of Marine Assets ......................................................................................... 3-18 Deepwater Ports ......................................................................................................... 3-18 River Ports .................................................................................................................. 3-18 Neighbor Ports ............................................................................................................ 3-18 3.4.2 Port of Morehead City Activity/Demand ...................................................................... 3-19 3.4.3 Port Challenges .......................................................................................................... 3-20 3.4.4 Port of Morehead City Future Growth ......................................................................... 3-20 3.5 Air Cargo Profile ......................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Tacci7 Centuries
    North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources State Historic Preservation Office David L. S. Brook, Administrator Michael F. Easley, Governor Division of Archives and History Lisbeth C. Evans, Secretary Jeffrey J. Crow, Director June 12, 2001 MEMORANDUM To: William Gilmore Project Development & Environmental Analysis, NCDOT From: David Brook Ple___1:51,-Stur.A.Cinc)clz_ Re: Improve NC 24 from 2.8 miles east of 1-95 to 1-40, R-2303, Multi County, ER 01-9171 Thank you for your letter of May 4, 2000, transmitting the survey report addendum by Marvin A. Brown for the above project. We apologize for the delay in our response. The report addendum is eloquently written and meets our office's guidelines and those of the Secretary of the Interior. For purposes of compliance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act, we concur that the following property is eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places under .the criterion cited: Stedman Historic District under Criteria A and C as an intact example of a rural Cumberland County town that arose, along with a railroad line and depot, in the late nineteenth and early twentieth tacCI7 centuries. The boundaries shown are appropriate. oc' There are two additions to the report which would be helpful to the reader and ensure that the report, as outlined in our guidelines, serves as a stand-alone document. These are the addition of a map that shows the relationship of the Stedman Historic District to the area of potential effect for the improvement of NC 24 and the former rail lines' being shown on Figure 2.
    [Show full text]
  • North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources State Historic Preservation Office David L
    North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources State Historic Preservation Office David L. S. Brook. Administrator Michael F. Easley, Governor Division of Historical Resources Lisbeth C. Evans, Secretary David J. Olson, Director Jeffrey J. Crow, Deputy Secretary May 23, 2003 MEMORANDUM TO: Greg Thorpe, Manager Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch NCDOT Division of Highways FROM: David Brook SUBJECT: Flistoric/Architectural Resources Survey Report, Widen US 221 from SR 1536 in Rutherford County to 1-40 in McDowell County, R-2597, Rutherford and McDowell Counties, CH02-10510 Thank you for your letter of April 29, 2003, transmitting the survey report by Frances P. Alexander of Mattson, Alexander and Associates. For purposes of compliance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act, we concur that the following properties are eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places under the criterion cited: William Monteith House, Gilkey, Rutherford County Albert Weaver Farm, Thermal City, Rutherford County B. G. Hensley House, Glenwood vicinity, McDowell County ; The William Monteirkliouse, west side of US 221, 0.1 mile north of SR 1351, Gilkey, RutherfasnaCounty,is-eligible,for the National Register ,under Criterion C for architecture. The Monteith _House is an especially fine expression of the Queen Anne style in Rutherford County-,.. We concur with the proposed National Register boundaries as described and delMeated.in the report. - The Albert Weaver Farm, west side of SR 1321-, 0.1 mile west of, US 221; Thermal City, Rutherford County, is eligible for the National Register underCriterion A for agriculture and Criterion C for .architecture-. The farmhouse and its collection of intact and in-place .
    [Show full text]
  • Transportation Planning for the Richmond–Charlotte Railroad Corridor
    VOLUME I Executive Summary and Main Report Technical Monograph: Transportation Planning for the Richmond–Charlotte Railroad Corridor Federal Railroad Administration United States Department of Transportation January 2004 Disclaimer: This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the Department of Transportation solely in the interest of information exchange. The United States Government assumes no liability for the contents or use thereof, nor does it express any opinion whatsoever on the merit or desirability of the project(s) described herein. The United States Government does not endorse products or manufacturers. Any trade or manufacturers' names appear herein solely because they are considered essential to the object of this report. Note: In an effort to better inform the public, this document contains references to a number of Internet web sites. Web site locations change rapidly and, while every effort has been made to verify the accuracy of these references as of the date of publication, the references may prove to be invalid in the future. Should an FRA document prove difficult to find, readers should access the FRA web site (www.fra.dot.gov) and search by the document’s title or subject. 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient's Catalog No. FRA/RDV-04/02 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date January 2004 Technical Monograph: Transportation Planning for the Richmond–Charlotte Railroad Corridor⎯Volume I 6. Performing Organization Code 7. Authors: 8. Performing Organization Report No. For the engineering contractor: Michael C. Holowaty, Project Manager For the sponsoring agency: Richard U. Cogswell and Neil E. Moyer 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10.
    [Show full text]
  • The Western North Carolina Railroad, 1855-1894
    THE WESTERN NORTH CAROLINA RAILROAD, 1855-1894 A thesis Presented to The Faculty of the Graduate School Western Carolina University In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts by William Hutson Abrams, Jr. August 6, 1976 PREFACE The Western North Carolina Railroad was the instrumental force in opening up the isolated communities of Western North Carolina. This paper will deal primarily with the construction of this railroad which left Salisbury, climbed the mountains to Asheville, and continued to ter.ninal points of Paint Rock and Ducktown, on the Tennessee Line. The difficulties encountered during construction will be emphasized along with the political aspects that went along with construction. Emphasis will be placed on the time between the State's acquisition of the Railroad in 1875 and the completion to Murphy in 1891. An introductory chapter will briefly cover the start of the railroad in 1855, its role in the Civil War, and the delays in construction caused by the scandals of the Reconstruction Period. Starting with 1875, a vital element in the construction, convict labor, will be dealt with. The management of the railroad varied between state and private ownership. It suffered the financial pains that many early lines endured. Most of all, it was hindered by the ever present problem presented by nature as the track was built through so~e of the roughest terrain east of the Rocky Mountains. This was really the significant feature of the railroad because at many times its further construction seemed to be impossible. Political, financial, managerial, and labor problems testify to the trying task that was accomplished and to the desire of the people of the western part of the state to have their railroad.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2014 Network for Economic Expansion Table of Contents
    ANNUAL REPORT 2014 NETWORK FOR ECONOMIC EXPANSION TABLE OF CONTENTS LETTER FROM THE CHAIRMAN .........................................................................................4 JOB CREATION FOR THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE..........................................................5 PURSUIT OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT .......................................................................6 ONGOING CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM IN PLACE .....................................7 STRATEGIC PLANNING: THE BLUEPRINT ......................................................................9 A MORE POWERFUL DRIVER OF PROSPERITY ...........................................................10 MEASURING ECONOMIC IMPACT .................................................................................... 11 BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND MANAGEMENT TEAM ................................................12 FINANCIAL REPORT...............................................................................................................13 NORTH CAROLINA RAILROAD COMPANY CORRIDOR MAP ..................................31 OUR MISSION: To develop the unique North Carolina Railroad assets for the good of the people of North Carolina. OUR VISION: To improve our state by: Enabling freight to grow business; Expanding rail to move people; Investing in North Carolina. HISTORY TELLS US THAT THE PURPOSE OF THE NORTH CAROLINA RAILROAD COMPANY’S CREATION 166 YEARS AGO WAS TO ENHANCE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT. IN 2014, THE COMPANY’S COMMITMENT TO SERVE THE PEOPLE OF NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SAME WAY
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2019
    ANNUAL REPORT 2019 NORTH CAROLINA RAILROAD COMPANY | ANNUAL REPORT 2019 | PAGE 1 OUR Putting the North Carolina Railroad Company to work for the MISSION good of the people of North Carolina. To improve our state by: OUR Enabling freight to grow business; VISION Expanding rail to move people; Investing in North Carolina. PAGE 2 | NORTH CAROLINA RAILROAD COMPANY | ANNUAL REPORT 2019 LETTER FROM THE CHAIRMAN 2019 was a productive year for the North Carolina Railroad Company. We maintained our focus on economic development — bringing attention to rail-served sites in every part of the state, as well as investing in freight rail infrastructure to assist in the recruitment or expansion of rail-served businesses across the state. We made significant investments in rail infrastructure including improvements to railroad bridges in Durham and Morrisville to address safety needs, while also planning for future growth of both freight and passenger service. We also began preparing for an important transition. Following more than three decades leading the North Carolina Railroad – President Scott Saylor is retiring July 2020. During his 31-year career with NCRR, Scott set a bold vision for the company, and oversaw impressive growth of the organization and the role it plays in rail-served economic development. As we look to the future, we will continue to make strategic investments in freight rail infrastructure both on and off the NCRR corridor to assist with economic development and job creation. We are studying future rail infrastructure needs to address connectivity of suburban and rural residential areas with high-density employment locations along the NCRR corridor.
    [Show full text]
  • A Brief History of the North Carolina Railroad Company
    A Brief History of the North Carolina Railroad Company The North Carolina Railroad Company (NCRR) owns and manages the 317-mile rail corridor that extends across 16 counties from the Port of Morehead City to Charlotte and impacts nearly a quarter of the state’s economy. The railroad carries 50-60 freight trains and 10 passenger trains daily. As the oldest extant private business corporation in the state, NCRR remains at the forefront of rail improvements and partnership development to promote job growth, and attract and retain rail-served industry in North Carolina. The North Carolina Railroad, chartered in 1849 as a 223-mile long corridor between Charlotte and Goldsboro, merged in 1989 with the Atlantic & North Carolina Railroad (A&NCRR) to create the current 317-mile long corridor between Charlotte and Morehead City, North Carolina. The Early Years: In 1848, the North Carolina legislature authorized an east to west railroad that would connect the coastal plain with the piedmont for the purpose of opening the state for economic and industrial development. The 1849 charter called for the NCRR to run “from the Wilmington and Raleigh Railroad where the same passes over the Neuse River in the county of Wayne, via Raleigh, and thence by the most practical route, via Salisbury, in the county of Rowan, to the town of Charlotte in the county of Mecklenburg.” Walter Gwynn, a native of Virginia, served as chief engineer of the line from 1850 to 1856 performing much of the initial surveying and planning for the railroad. NC Senate President Calvin Graves received the honor of lifting the first shovel of dirt at a groundbreaking ceremony in Greensboro on July 11, 1851.
    [Show full text]
  • North Carolina Railroad System Map-August 2019
    North Carolina !( Railroad System Clover !( !( South Boston Franklin Danville !( !( !( Mount Airy !( !( Clarksville Alleghany Eden !( Mayo Currituck Camden Ashe Hyco !( !( Gates !( Roanoke !( Conway Surry YVR Norlina Weldon R Stokes Rockingham Granville Rapids Elizabeth CA Caswell Person Vance !( Hertford City !( Roxboro Northampton !( Reidsville !( !( YVRR Oxford Henderson Warren Halifax !(Ahoskie VA Rural NC Watauga Wilkes !( Pasquotank Hall CA !( !( Erwin!( Yadkin Orange Kelford Chowan Perquimans North Durham Guilford !( N Franklin Avery Wilkesboro Forsyth !( Burlington Butner !( CDOT Mitchell ! Bertie !( Winston ! !(Hillsborough Franklinton Edenton Salem Greensboro Nash Caldwell ! Durham Rocky Midway !( High !( Wake Forest CLNA !(Taylorsville Iredell Davie ! Alamance !( ! Mount Yancey Lenoir Davidson Spring ! Madison !( Point Carrboro !( !( Tarboro Washington Alexander A Wake Burke C R Hope !( W C C T Zebulon Plymouth Tyrrell Y O !( Edgecombe !( Statesville !( D Cary CLNA Middlesex Lexington C !( !( !( Parmele Dare N ! W ! W Martin s Buncombe !( Hickory ! S !( S ain Chatham Raleigh Wendell t S n McDowell !( Morganton S !(Apex ! ou CMLX Marion !( k !Wilson M c rk Asheboro NHVX ky a Haywood !( !( o Pitt o P T Newton ! A l Salisbury n !( Wilson f m a O New Hll l !(Clayton N S n Old Fort Catawba !( L CLNA D t o m i CMIZ Denton u a t !( CLNA C C Greenville re a BLU Rowan Randolph u !( N Asheville G G N C !( W !( !( Belhaven Swain !( S !( Fuquay-Varina !( S !( Waynesville BLU A ! Washington !( GSM Lincoln Lincolnton ! T Selma Chocowinity
    [Show full text]
  • Class I Railroad Annual Report
    OEEAA – R1 OMB Clearance No. 2140-0009 Expiration Date 12-31-2022 Class I Railroad Annual Report Norfolk Southern Combined Railroad Subsidiaries Three Commercial Place Norfolk, VA 23510-2191 Full name and address of reporting carrier Correct name and address if different than shown (Use mailing label on original, copy in full on duplicate) To the Surface Transportation Board For the year ending December 31, 2019 Road Initials: NS Rail Year: 2019 ANNUAL REPORT OF NORFOLK SOUTHERN COMBINED RAILROAD SUBSIDIARIES ("NS RAIL") TO THE Surface Transporation Board FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2019 Name, official title, telephone number, and office address of officer in charge of correspondence with the Board regarding this report: (Name) Jason A. Zampi (Title) Vice President and Controller (Telephone number) (757) 629-2680 (Area Code) (Office address) Three Commercial Place Norfolk, Virginia 23510-2191 (Street and number, city, state, and ZIP code) Railroad Annual Report R-1 NOTICE 1. This report is required for every class I railroad operating within the United States. Three copies of this Annual Report should be completed. Two of the copies must be filed with the Surface Transportation Board, Office of Economics, Environmental Analysis, and Administration, 395 E Street, S.W. Suite 1100, Washington, DC 20423, by March 31 of the year following that for which the report is made. One copy should be retained by the carrier. 2. Every inquiry must be definitely answered. Where the word "none" truly and completely states the fact, it should be given as the answer. If any inquiry is inapplicable, the words "not applicable" should be used.
    [Show full text]
  • Is the North Carolina Railroad on the Right Track
    Karen Tam Summary In the fall of 1994, the state announced the terms of a tentative new lease with Norfolk Southern Corporation for the North Carolina Railroad-a 317-mile rail line that arcs across the state from Morehead City through Goldsboro, Raleigh, and Greensboro to Charlotte. The state owns 75 percent of the railroad and private shareholders own 25 percent. Announcing a lease agreement ended months of speculation about how much the state would improve on a 99-year lease (1895 to 1994) that returned less than l percent on today's dollar-a figure history had proven to be ridicu- lously low. The tentative agreement included a substantially higher lease rate, plus plans to reorganize the railroad as a real estate investment trust to escape state and federal taxes and thus increase its return to investors. But as quickly as the new lease was announced, it was denounced by the private shareholders. They complained they had been low-balled again and continued to maintain that the state has a conflict of interest that forces it to keep lease rates low at their expense. Private shareholders moved quickly to try and block the agreement. Four separate lawsuits were filed, and another group of shareholders launched a boycott of the meeting at which the new lease agreement would be proposed for approval. The state's primary interest is in keeping the rail line open and operating for economic developmentpurposes-even the less profitable links such as the line between Goldsboro and Morehead City. Longer term, the state sees a role for the railroad in upgrading passenger service between Charlotte and Raleigh, provid- ing commuter service for rapidly growing urban areas such as the Research Triangle Park region, and even providing a corridorforfuturistic high-speed rail.
    [Show full text]
  • Petersen Approval Copy of Dissertation4
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by The University of North Carolina at Greensboro PETERSEN, KERI T., Ph.D. The North Carolina Railroad, Industrial Slavery, and the Economic Development of North Carolina. (2017) Directed by Dr. Watson W. Jennison. 241 pp. During the first half of the nineteenth century, western North Carolina leaders fought a sectional political battle against an eastern-led legislature to gain political power and construct the North Carolina Railroad (NCRR) through the Piedmont. Over the course of westerners’ push for internal improvements and the successful construction of the NCRR, western leaders grew from a marginal group on the periphery of North Carolina’s economy to controlling the future trajectory of the state’s economic development. The NCRR Company’s directors and contractors employed thousands of hired slaves to construct the railroad from 1851-1856, and hundreds more to maintain and operate trains, tracks, and facilities from 1856 through the end of the Civil War. The economic benefits of the new railroad combined with the opportunity to profit from regular slave hiring, extended the benefits of slavery to all classes of North Carolina’s slaveholders, and created jobs and economic opportunities for all white North Carolinians. The enslaved men who were hired out to the NCRR performed all of the hard labor that made the NCRR a reality. Slave hire contracts between masters and the company ripped these men away from their home farms and plantations, and sentenced them to a brutal existence in the NCRR’s labor camps—a place void of slave families and communities, and characterized by inadequate food, shelter, clothing, and medical attention.
    [Show full text]
  • Freight Tariff Ns 8001 - A
    ORIGINAL TITLE PAGE NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY VISION: BE THE SAFEST, MOST CUSTOMER-FOCUSED AND SUCCESSFUL TRANSPORTATION COMPANY IN THE WORLD FREIGHT TARIFF NS 8001 - A (For Cancellation, See Page 3) LOCAL AND JOINT FREIGHT TARIFF PUBLISHING RULES AND CHARGES ON SWITCHING AND ABSORPTION OF SWITCH CHARGES AT STATIONS ON NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY SWITCHING AND ABSORPTION TARIFF ISSUED FEBRUARY 1, 2000 EFFECTIVE MARCH 1, 2000 ISSUED BY Pricing Services NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY Three Commercial Place Norfolk, VA 23510 NS 8001 - A 74TH REVISED CHECK SHEET A CHECK SHEET – SWITCHING AND ABSORP TION TARIFF ORIGINAL AND REVISED PAGES NAMED BELOW CONTAIN ALL CHANGES FROM THE ORIGINAL TARIFF. THE EFFECTIVE DATE IS AS SHOWN ON EACH REVISED PAGE. PAGE REVISION PAGE REVISION PAGE REVISION 1 1ST REVISED 42 ORIGINAL 82 3RD REVISED 2 1ST REVISED 43 1ST REVISED 83 3RD REVISED 3 1ST REVISED 44 ORIGINAL 84 3RD REVISED 4 ORIGINAL 45 ORIGINAL 85 17TH REVISED # 5 6TH REVISED 46 11TH REVISED 86 9TH REVISED 6 2ND REVISED 47 7TH REVISED # 87 8TH REVISED 7 5TH REVISED # 48 8TH REVISED # 88 7TH REVISED 8 1ST REVISED # 49 4TH REVISED 89 4TH REVISED 9 ORIGINAL 50 3RD REVISED 90 5TH REVISED 10 ORIGINAL 51 1ST REVISED 91 7TH REVISED 11 ORIGINAL 52 7TH REVISED # 92 8TH REVISED 12 ORIGINAL 53 3RD REVISED 93 ORIGINAL 13 1ST REVISED # 54 18TH REVISED 94 ORIGINAL 14 ORIGINAL 55 7TH REVISED 95 6TH REVISED 15 1ST REVISED 56 2ND REVISED 96 7TH REVISED 16 5TH REVISED # 57 8TH REVISED 97 8TH REVISED 17 5TH REVISED # 58 9TH REVISED 98 6TH REVISED 18 ORIGINAL
    [Show full text]