DOCSLIB.ORG

Western North Carolina Inland Port Feasibility Study

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Western North Carolina Inland Port Feasibility Study Western North Carolina Inland Port Feasibility Study Western Carolina University, College of Business, Institute for the Economy and the Future AdvantageWest The Louis Berger Group The Tioga Group Principal Investigator: Michael E. Smith, Ph.D. Associate Professor of Global Management and Strategy College of Business, Western Carolina University Cullowhee, NC 28723 (828) 227-3697; [email protected] Western North Carolina Inland Port Feasibility Study Table of Contents Table of Exhibits ................................................................................................................. 5! Acknowledgements.......................................................................................................... 7! Western Carolina University, College of Business and The Institute for the Economy and the Future ............................................................................................................................ 7! Funding Partners............................................................................................................. 7! AdvantageWest ........................................................................................................... 7! Appalachian Regional Commission................................................................................. 7! North Carolina Rural Economic Development Center....................................................... 7! I.! Executive Summary....................................................................................................... 8! II.! Introduction .............................................................................................................. 11! III.! Study Methodology .................................................................................................... 13! Characterization of Existing Conditions............................................................................ 13! Location-Based Market Conditions .................................................................................. 13! Assess Inland Port Feasibility.......................................................................................... 14! Coordinating with the Appalachian Regional Commission Network Appalachia Working Group .................................................................................................................................... 14! IV.! Review of Relevant Literature ..................................................................................... 15! Meeting the Transportation Challenges of the 21st Century: Intermodal Opportunities in the Appalachian Region (2004) ................................................................................... 16! Statewide Logistics Plan for North Carolina (2008) ....................................................... 19! Southern California Inland Port Feasibility Study: Inland Port Case Studies (2006).......... 20! North Carolina Waybill Analysis, Executive Summary (2006) ......................................... 21! South Carolina Inland Container Port Concept Study .................................................... 23! V.! Inland Ports ............................................................................................................... 25! What is an Inland Port? ................................................................................................. 25! The Potential of Inland Ports .......................................................................................... 25! Options......................................................................................................................... 27! Satellite Marine Terminals .......................................................................................... 27! All-Cargo Logistics Airports ......................................................................................... 27! Multi-Modal Logistics Parks ......................................................................................... 27! Rail Intermodal Parks................................................................................................. 28! Networks and Corridors.............................................................................................. 28! Economic Development Initiatives Designated Inland Ports........................................... 29! Trade Processing Centers ........................................................................................... 29! Inland Port Functions..................................................................................................... 29! Value-Added Functions............................................................................................... 30! Adding Value at Inland Ports ...................................................................................... 30! Commercial Customs Functions ...................................................................................... 31! Economic Development.................................................................................................. 32! Conventional Economic Development .......................................................................... 32! Logistics-based Economic Development....................................................................... 32! Inland Ports as Economic Development ....................................................................... 33! Characteristics of Successful Inland Ports........................................................................ 34! VI.! Freight Movement Trends and Impacts on Feasibility.................................................... 36! Escalating Fuel Cost....................................................................................................... 36! 2 - 2 - Western North Carolina Inland Port Feasibility Study Shift of Imports to All Water East Coast Routes ............................................................... 37! Dollar Devaluation and Export Growth............................................................................. 37! Rail Capacity and Pricing Trends..................................................................................... 37! Supply Chain Management............................................................................................. 38! VII.! Inland Port Case Studies ............................................................................................ 40! Northeast Ohio Intermodal Terminal (Neomodal)............................................................. 40! Financing Arrangements............................................................................................. 41! Lessons Learned........................................................................................................ 42! Heartland Corridor......................................................................................................... 43! Heartland Corridor Projects......................................................................................... 44! Portsmouth Rail Project.............................................................................................. 44! Columbus Terminal Expansion .................................................................................... 46! Roanoke, VA and Prichard, WV Intermodal Terminals................................................... 46! Funding .................................................................................................................... 48! Lessons Learned........................................................................................................ 48! San Joaquin Valley Inland Port ....................................................................................... 49! San Joaquin Valley Inland Port Project Review ............................................................. 50! Project Financing and Current Status........................................................................... 51! Lessons Learned........................................................................................................ 51! North American Inland Port Network (NAIPN).................................................................. 52! NAIPN Case Study Review .......................................................................................... 53! Lessons Learned........................................................................................................ 55! Port Des Moines Concept ............................................................................................... 56! Port Des Moines Concept Case Study Review ............................................................... 56! Port Des Moines Concept Current Status...................................................................... 59! Kansas City Smartport ................................................................................................... 60! Lessons Learned........................................................................................................ 60! Relevance to the WNC Inland Port Feasibility Study...................................................... 61! Southern California’s Port Network: Ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach & the Southern California Logistics Airport.............................................................................................. 63! The Role of a University ............................................................................................. 64! The “Agile Port Concept” ...........................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Tacci7 Centuries
    North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources State Historic Preservation Office David L. S. Brook, Administrator Michael F. Easley, Governor Division of Archives and History Lisbeth C. Evans, Secretary Jeffrey J. Crow, Director June 12, 2001 MEMORANDUM To: William Gilmore Project Development & Environmental Analysis, NCDOT From: David Brook Ple___1:51,-Stur.A.Cinc)clz_ Re: Improve NC 24 from 2.8 miles east of 1-95 to 1-40, R-2303, Multi County, ER 01-9171 Thank you for your letter of May 4, 2000, transmitting the survey report addendum by Marvin A. Brown for the above project. We apologize for the delay in our response. The report addendum is eloquently written and meets our office's guidelines and those of the Secretary of the Interior. For purposes of compliance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act, we concur that the following property is eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places under .the criterion cited: Stedman Historic District under Criteria A and C as an intact example of a rural Cumberland County town that arose, along with a railroad line and depot, in the late nineteenth and early twentieth tacCI7 centuries. The boundaries shown are appropriate. oc' There are two additions to the report which would be helpful to the reader and ensure that the report, as outlined in our guidelines, serves as a stand-alone document. These are the addition of a map that shows the relationship of the Stedman Historic District to the area of potential effect for the improvement of NC 24 and the former rail lines' being shown on Figure 2.
    [Show full text]
  • North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources State Historic Preservation Office David L
    North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources State Historic Preservation Office David L. S. Brook. Administrator Michael F. Easley, Governor Division of Historical Resources Lisbeth C. Evans, Secretary David J. Olson, Director Jeffrey J. Crow, Deputy Secretary May 23, 2003 MEMORANDUM TO: Greg Thorpe, Manager Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch NCDOT Division of Highways FROM: David Brook SUBJECT: Flistoric/Architectural Resources Survey Report, Widen US 221 from SR 1536 in Rutherford County to 1-40 in McDowell County, R-2597, Rutherford and McDowell Counties, CH02-10510 Thank you for your letter of April 29, 2003, transmitting the survey report by Frances P. Alexander of Mattson, Alexander and Associates. For purposes of compliance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act, we concur that the following properties are eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places under the criterion cited: William Monteith House, Gilkey, Rutherford County Albert Weaver Farm, Thermal City, Rutherford County B. G. Hensley House, Glenwood vicinity, McDowell County ; The William Monteirkliouse, west side of US 221, 0.1 mile north of SR 1351, Gilkey, RutherfasnaCounty,is-eligible,for the National Register ,under Criterion C for architecture. The Monteith _House is an especially fine expression of the Queen Anne style in Rutherford County-,.. We concur with the proposed National Register boundaries as described and delMeated.in the report. - The Albert Weaver Farm, west side of SR 1321-, 0.1 mile west of, US 221; Thermal City, Rutherford County, is eligible for the National Register underCriterion A for agriculture and Criterion C for .architecture-. The farmhouse and its collection of intact and in-place .
    [Show full text]
  • Urban Open Space - a Tower in the Park and a Park in the Tower
    ctbuh.org/papers Title: Urban Open Space - A Tower in the Park and a Park in the Tower Author: James Goettsch, CEO and Partner, Goettsch Partners Subjects: Architectural/Design Building Case Study Landscape Architecture Sustainability/Green/Energy Urban Design Publication Date: 2015 Original Publication: Global Interchanges: Resurgence of the Skyscraper City Paper Type: 1. Book chapter/Part chapter 2. Journal paper 3. Conference proceeding 4. Unpublished conference paper 5. Magazine article 6. Unpublished © Council on Tall Buildings and Urban Habitat / James Goettsch Urban Open Space - A Tower in the Park and a Park in the Tower Abstract James Goettsch CEO and Partner In urban centers dominated by tall buildings, access to outdoor space is important. We will Goettsch Partners, explain how two urban office building developments provide valuable outdoor open space in Chicago, USA different ways. In Chicago, the development involves transforming an open urban scar into one of the city’s largest public landscaped areas. The development is located on a key CBD site along the Chicago River. The result is a unique 52-story structure of which enclosed ground floor space James Goettsch, FAIA is the chairman and CEO of Goettsch Partners as well as the firm’s design director, responsible for occupies <25% of site area; offering public landscaped open space. Result: A Tower in the Park. developing the firm’s design talent and leading the direction In San Francisco, a developer is building a 42-story tower that covers virtually the entire site, with and quality for the office. He brings more than 40 years of professional experience and has personally directed all phases at-grade outdoor space limited to recessed entries.
    [Show full text]
  • Hoffman Park Hoffman Park Birds
    About Hoffman Park Hoffman Park Birds This 354-acre park is comprised of hardwood Location: Hoffman Park is located in Union A host of different bird species can be found in Township, west of Clinton and just south of the forests and fields, but Hoffman Park is Hoffman forest, grasslands, and many ponds of various sizes. The ponds were created in the 1940s by Interstate 78. The main parking area is at 26 probably best known among bird watchers for Albert and Joyce Hoffman for erosion Baptist Church Road, Hampton 08827. The endangered and threatened species that nest in control, crop irrigation, and cattle gate is open from 9:00 AM to sunset. A second its grassland habitat. These include Bobolinks, Park management when the park was a working parking lot is located at 751 Mechlin Corner Eastern Meadowlarks, Grasshopper Sparrows, farm. Albert Hoffman was the son of the Road, Hampton 08827. and Savannah Sparrows. Please keep pets on a founder of the Hoffman Beverage Company. leash as these birds nest directly on the ground Trail Map and Guide Directions from the East/Clinton area: and are highly susceptible to disturbance. Albert’s skilled innovations led to improvements in the sanitization, labeling, Take Route 78 west to exit 11. Follow the Eastern Bluebird nesting boxes and Wood and packaging of bottles. He also invented circle around to the left and cross over Route Duck boxes were erected in 2000 as part of a biological filters that extracted impurities 78, following the signs for Pattenburg. Boy Scout Eagle project. The bluebird boxes from concentrated sugar syrups.
    [Show full text]
  • Data Science Strategies for Real Estate Development by Sun Jung Park B.S., Hotel Administration, 2013 Cornell University Submitt
    Data Science Strategies for Real Estate Development by Sun Jung Park B.S., Hotel Administration, 2013 Cornell University Submitted to the Program in Real Estate Development in Conjunction with the Center for Real Estate in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Real Estate Development at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology September, 2020 ©2020 Sun Jung Park All rights reserved The author hereby grants to MIT permission to reproduce and to distribute publicly paper and electronic copies of this thesis document in whole or in part in any medium now known or hereafter created. Signature of Author_________________________________________________________ Center for Real Estate August 13, 2020 Certified by_______________________________________________________________ Dr. Andrea M. Chegut Research Scientist, Center for Real Estate Thesis Supervisor Accepted by______________________________________________________________ Professor Dennis Frenchman Class of 1922 Professor of Urban Design and Planning Department or Urban Studies and Planning Director, MIT Center for Real Estate Data Science Strategies for Real Estate Development by Sun Jung Park Submitted to the Program in Real Estate Development in Conjunction with the Center for Real Estate on August 13, 2020 in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Real Estate Development ABSTRACT Big data and the increasing usage of data science is changing the way the real estate industry is functioning. From pricing estimates and valuation to marketing and leasing, the power of predictive analytics is improving the business processes and presenting new ways of operating. The field of affordable housing development, however, has often lacked investment and seen delays in adopting new technology and data science.
    [Show full text]
  • Cave Creek Regional Park
    4.3 Mi.(6.9 Km) to Spur Cross Ranch from park boundary Maricopa Trail h s STATE a YIELD W TO e h 2807 c .0 a 1 24 2602 7) 00 p (1. A 9 . ) Gunsight 2666 0 4 . 400 PRIV ATE 1 Pass 2 ( 2600 GJ 2800 ) s 3060 r e s t STATE e e GJ il M m lo 2357 0 .4 i 0 1 K Go John 9 6 . 2 1 .3 0 ) ( . 2 5 1 1 ( Mountain . West (1 8 0.2 ) Boundary 24 P. A. Seitts (0.4) Maricopa Trail 00 Spur 2788 Preserve at Go 2785 John Canyon 400 2 6 n 0. ) Joh C .0 Go an ) (1 2 y . 4 See reverse .7 . 5 o OV 0 0 . 0 0 n ) ( for details .1 FR ) (1 0.3 (0.8 0 0.9 2347 .5 (0. (0 0.7 4) (1.5) .8 CM 2557 1 ) (1.1) JS .1 V ( 0.2 0 1.8) 220 0. 8 ) (0.3) 6 . No horses west 2 ( 0 . of Clay Mine 1.0 1 Clay ay ) ( kw SL r y y Mine Pa 2 STATE 2 r a 00 QZ W 0.8 a t ( ` ( 0 i 1 0 l .3 . O ) k . 1 i e 2 r l e iv r 2610 ) M e i C 0. p Y n e 2 6 e 2093 0 s v 0 ( a A 1 a 0 .0 J Z v C ) n Slat 7 L STATE e a 0.4 v 2288 Rodeo La (0.6) Arena M ainte nanc e 2711 t 2 2 1 S 0 .5 0 ( 2 k d .
    [Show full text]
  • NSC 2020 Early March Auction Results
    MFG MODEL SCALE ROADNAME ROAD # VARIATION # PRICE MEMBER MTL 20090 N SOUTHERN PACIFIC 97947 SINGLE CAR 1 MTL 20170 N BURLINGTON-CB&Q 62988 WZ @ BW 2 MTL 20240 N NEW YORK CENTRAL 174710 PACEMAKER 3 MTL 20240 N NEW YORK CENTRAL 174710 PACEMAKER 4 $11.00 6231 MTL 20630 N WEST INDIA FRUIT 101 5 $19.00 5631 MTL 20850 N SPOKANE, PORTLAND & SEATTLE 12218 6 MTL 20880 N LAKE SUPERIOR & ISHPEMING 2290 7 $14.00 1687 MTL 20880 N LAKE SUPERIOR & ISHPEMING 2290 7 $14.00 6258 MTL 20950 N CHICAGO GREAT WESTERN 90017 8 MTL 20970 N PACIFIC GREAT EASTERN 4022 9 $14.00 1687 MTL 20066 N PENNSYLVANIA 30902 "MERCHANDISE SERVICE" 10 MTL 20086 N MICROTRAINS LINE COMPANY 1991 1ST ANNIVERSARY 11 MTL 20126 N LEHIGH VALLEY 62545 12 $10.00 2115 MTL 20186 N GREAT NORTHERN 19617 CIRCUS CAR #7 -RED 13 MTL 20306/2 N BURLINGTON NORTHERN 189288 14 MTL 20346 N BALTIMORE & OHIO 470687 "TIMESAVER" 15 MTL 20346-2 N BALTIMORE & OHIO 470751 16 MTL 20486 N MONON 861 "THE HOOSIER LINE" 17 $18.00 6258 MTL 21020 N STATE OF MAINE 2231 40' STANDARD BXCR, PLUG DOOR 18 MTL 21040 N GREAT NORTHERN 7136 40' STANDARD BXCR, PLUG DOOR 19 $19.00 2115 MTL 21212 N BURLINGTON NORTHERN 4-PACK "FALLEN FLAGS #03 20 MTL 21230 N BRITISH COLUMBIA RAILWAY 8002 21 MTL 22030 N UNION PACIFIC 110013 22 MTL 22180 N MILWAUKEE 29960 23 MTL 23230 N UNION PACIFIC 9149 "CHALLENGER" 24 $24.00 4489 MTL 23240 N ASHLEY, DREW & NORTHERN 2413 25 MTL 24030 N NORFOLK & WESTERN 391331 26 MTL 24240 N GULF, MOBILE & OHIO 21583 40' BXCR, SINGLE DOOR, NO ROOFWALK 27 $11.00 6231 MTL 25020 N MAINE CENTRAL 31011 50' RIB SIDE BXCR, SINGLE DR W/O ROOFWALK 28 MTL 25300 N ST.
    [Show full text]
  • Rail Fmnt Catalog Visit
    Rail FMnt Catalog visit: www.RailFonts.com Thank you for your interest in our selection of rail fonts and icons. They are an inexpensive way to turn your PC or Macintosh computer into a rail yard. About all you need to use the fonts is a computer and word processor (that's all I used to prepare this catalog). It's just that easy. For example, type "wsz" using the Freight font and in your document you get: wsz 99999999 On the other hand, if you typed, "ZSW" you would get: ZSW 99999999 (to add the track, just type "99999" on the next line) Thumbing through the catalog, you will find that most of the fonts fall into one of three categories: lettering similar to that used by the railroads, rolling stock silhouettes that couple together in your document, and rail clip-art. All of the silhouette fonts fit together, so you can create a real mixed train. Visit www.RailFonts.com to order the fonts or for more information. Benn Coifman CLIPART FONTS: UYxnFGHI Rail Art Font 1.0: This font is based on artwork from timetables, advertisements and other company publications during the golden age of railroading. rQwEA Sd f2l More Rail Art Font 1.0: This font is based on artwork from timetables, advertisements and other company publications during the golden age of railroading. zq8ialhEOd. LaGrange Font 1.2: This font captures the colorful styling of the EMD f-unit in its many faces. Over 50 different paint schemes included. Use the period or comma to add flags.
    [Show full text]
  • Transportation Planning for the Richmond–Charlotte Railroad Corridor
    VOLUME I Executive Summary and Main Report Technical Monograph: Transportation Planning for the Richmond–Charlotte Railroad Corridor Federal Railroad Administration United States Department of Transportation January 2004 Disclaimer: This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the Department of Transportation solely in the interest of information exchange. The United States Government assumes no liability for the contents or use thereof, nor does it express any opinion whatsoever on the merit or desirability of the project(s) described herein. The United States Government does not endorse products or manufacturers. Any trade or manufacturers' names appear herein solely because they are considered essential to the object of this report. Note: In an effort to better inform the public, this document contains references to a number of Internet web sites. Web site locations change rapidly and, while every effort has been made to verify the accuracy of these references as of the date of publication, the references may prove to be invalid in the future. Should an FRA document prove difficult to find, readers should access the FRA web site (www.fra.dot.gov) and search by the document’s title or subject. 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient's Catalog No. FRA/RDV-04/02 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date January 2004 Technical Monograph: Transportation Planning for the Richmond–Charlotte Railroad Corridor⎯Volume I 6. Performing Organization Code 7. Authors: 8. Performing Organization Report No. For the engineering contractor: Michael C. Holowaty, Project Manager For the sponsoring agency: Richard U. Cogswell and Neil E. Moyer 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10.
    [Show full text]
  • Roeland Park Shopping Center
    Roeland Park Shopping Center FOR SALE—152,009 SQUARE FEET 100% OCCUPANCY—FIRST FLOOR RETAIL SPACE 10000 College Boulevard Suite 120 Overland Park, KS 66210 Jodi Belpedio 913-653-8200 www.woodsonpartners.com Email: [email protected] All information furnished regarding property for lease is from sources deemed reliable, but no warranty or representation is made as to the accuracy thereof and the same is submitted subject to errors, omissions, changes of prices, rental or other conditions, prior lease or withdraw without notice. Roeland Park Shopping Center BUILDING ROELAND PARK INFORMATION SHOPPING CENTER Prestigiously located in high traffic area of Johnson 152,009 Square Feet Retail Space County. Prime retail Roe Avenue Corridor Convenient access off I-35 Convenient front door parking Highly qualified and responsive leasing and Handicap accessible management team keeping our retention rate one of the highest in the market. Wal-Mart anchored center Stable volume of key tenants along with stable cash 100% occupancy flow Key tenants include Wal-Mart, CVS Pharmacy and Taco Bell Storage space of 4,937 square feet Woodson Partners, LLC 10000 College Boulevard Suite 120 Overland Park, KS 66210 Jodi Belpedio 913-653-8200 www.woodsonpartners.com Email: [email protected] Roeland Park Shopping Center Demographics 1 mile radius 3 mile radius 5 mile radius Total Population 11,639 93,859 261,253 Total Households 5,340 44,561 116,088 Median Age 36.54 37.72 37.00 Average Household Income $60,812 $62,444 $66,444 Woodson Partners, LLC 10000 College Boulevard Suite 120 Overland Park, KS 66210 Jodi Belpedio 913-653-8200 www.woodsonpartners.com Email: [email protected] Roeland Park Shopping Center Woodson Partners, LLC 10000 College Boulevard Suite 120 Overland Park, KS 66210 Jodi Belpedio 913-653-8200 www.woodsonpartners.com Email: [email protected] Roeland Park Shopping Center SITE PLAN Woodson Partners, LLC 10000 College Boulevard Suite 120 Overland Park, KS 66210 Jodi Belpedio 913-653-8200 www.woodsonpartners.com Email: [email protected] .
    [Show full text]
  • The Western North Carolina Railroad, 1855-1894
    THE WESTERN NORTH CAROLINA RAILROAD, 1855-1894 A thesis Presented to The Faculty of the Graduate School Western Carolina University In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts by William Hutson Abrams, Jr. August 6, 1976 PREFACE The Western North Carolina Railroad was the instrumental force in opening up the isolated communities of Western North Carolina. This paper will deal primarily with the construction of this railroad which left Salisbury, climbed the mountains to Asheville, and continued to ter.ninal points of Paint Rock and Ducktown, on the Tennessee Line. The difficulties encountered during construction will be emphasized along with the political aspects that went along with construction. Emphasis will be placed on the time between the State's acquisition of the Railroad in 1875 and the completion to Murphy in 1891. An introductory chapter will briefly cover the start of the railroad in 1855, its role in the Civil War, and the delays in construction caused by the scandals of the Reconstruction Period. Starting with 1875, a vital element in the construction, convict labor, will be dealt with. The management of the railroad varied between state and private ownership. It suffered the financial pains that many early lines endured. Most of all, it was hindered by the ever present problem presented by nature as the track was built through so~e of the roughest terrain east of the Rocky Mountains. This was really the significant feature of the railroad because at many times its further construction seemed to be impossible. Political, financial, managerial, and labor problems testify to the trying task that was accomplished and to the desire of the people of the western part of the state to have their railroad.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2014 Network for Economic Expansion Table of Contents
    ANNUAL REPORT 2014 NETWORK FOR ECONOMIC EXPANSION TABLE OF CONTENTS LETTER FROM THE CHAIRMAN .........................................................................................4 JOB CREATION FOR THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE..........................................................5 PURSUIT OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT .......................................................................6 ONGOING CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM IN PLACE .....................................7 STRATEGIC PLANNING: THE BLUEPRINT ......................................................................9 A MORE POWERFUL DRIVER OF PROSPERITY ...........................................................10 MEASURING ECONOMIC IMPACT .................................................................................... 11 BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND MANAGEMENT TEAM ................................................12 FINANCIAL REPORT...............................................................................................................13 NORTH CAROLINA RAILROAD COMPANY CORRIDOR MAP ..................................31 OUR MISSION: To develop the unique North Carolina Railroad assets for the good of the people of North Carolina. OUR VISION: To improve our state by: Enabling freight to grow business; Expanding rail to move people; Investing in North Carolina. HISTORY TELLS US THAT THE PURPOSE OF THE NORTH CAROLINA RAILROAD COMPANY’S CREATION 166 YEARS AGO WAS TO ENHANCE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT. IN 2014, THE COMPANY’S COMMITMENT TO SERVE THE PEOPLE OF NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SAME WAY
    [Show full text]