DOCSLIB.ORG

Tacci7 Centuries

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Tacci7 Centuries North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources State Historic Preservation Office David L. S. Brook, Administrator Michael F. Easley, Governor Division of Archives and History Lisbeth C. Evans, Secretary Jeffrey J. Crow, Director June 12, 2001 MEMORANDUM To: William Gilmore Project Development & Environmental Analysis, NCDOT From: David Brook Ple___1:51,-Stur.A.Cinc)clz_ Re: Improve NC 24 from 2.8 miles east of 1-95 to 1-40, R-2303, Multi County, ER 01-9171 Thank you for your letter of May 4, 2000, transmitting the survey report addendum by Marvin A. Brown for the above project. We apologize for the delay in our response. The report addendum is eloquently written and meets our office's guidelines and those of the Secretary of the Interior. For purposes of compliance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act, we concur that the following property is eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places under .the criterion cited: Stedman Historic District under Criteria A and C as an intact example of a rural Cumberland County town that arose, along with a railroad line and depot, in the late nineteenth and early twentieth tacCI7 centuries. The boundaries shown are appropriate. oc' There are two additions to the report which would be helpful to the reader and ensure that the report, as outlined in our guidelines, serves as a stand-alone document. These are the addition of a map that shows the relationship of the Stedman Historic District to the area of potential effect for the improvement of NC 24 and the former rail lines' being shown on Figure 2. While the text states that the extent of the former rail line parcel is depicted on the map of the district, the move of the depot away from the tracks and encroachments between First and Second Street create some confusion. A label or the use of a symbol for the former railroad right-of-way could clarify this matter for the reader. The above comments are offered in accord with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the regulations of the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation at 36 CFR 800. If you have any questions concerning them, please contact Renee Gledhill-Earley at 733-4763. Thank you. cc: Mary Pope Furr, NCDOT Nicholas Graf, FHwA Marvin A. Brown bc: Brown/Montgomery' DOT Location Mailing Address Telephone/Fax Administration County 507 N. Blount St. Raleigh. NC 4617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh 27699-4617 (919) 733-4763 .733-8653 Restoration RF 515 N. Blount St. Raleigh NC 4613 Mail Service Center. Raleigh 27699-4613 (919) 733-6547 .715-4801 Survey & Planning 515 N. Blount St, Raleigh. NC 4618 Mail Service Center, Raleigh 27699-4618 (919) 733-4763 .715-4801 ADDENDUM TO A HISTORIC ARCHITECTURAL RESOURCES SURVEY REPORT PHASE II (INTENSIVE) NC 24 FROM 2.8 MILES EAST OF 1-95 TO 1-40 CUMBERLAND, SAMPSON, AND DUPLIN COUNTIES, NORTH CAROLINA EVALUATION OF STEDMAN HISTORIC DISTRICT TIP NO. R-2303 STATE PROJECT NO. 8.T280802 FEDERAL AID PROJECT NO. STPNHF-F-8-2-(17) Prepared For: PARSONS TRANSPORTATION GROUP, INC. Cary, North Carolina 27513 Prepared By: Marvin A. Brown URS CORPORATION - MARYLAND Raleigh, North Carolina 27604 APRIL 2001 ADDENDUM TO A HISTORIC ARCHITECTURAL RESOURCES SURVEY REPORT PHASE II (INTENSIVE) NC 24 FROM 2.8 MILES EAST OF 1-95 TO 1-40 CUMBERLAND, SAMPSON, AND DUPLIN COUNTIES, NORTH CAROLINA EVALUATION OF STEDMAN HISTORIC DISTRICT TIP No. R-2303 State Project No. 8.T280802 Federal Aid Project No. STPNHF-F-8-2(17) Prepared For: Parsons Transportation Group, Inc. 401 Harrison Oaks Boulevard, Suite 200 Cary, North Carolina 27513 Prepared By: URS Corporation - Maryland 3109 Poplarwood Court, Suite 301 Raleigh, North Carolina 27604 April 2001 l7/20/6/ Marvin A. Brown, rincipal Investigator Date URS Corporation - Maryland 't an P6)0.1 Mary Pope _ruff, Supervisor Date Historic Architectural Resources Section North Carolina Department of Transportation TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Introduction and Summary of Findings 1 IL List of Figures and Plates 2 Ill. Methodology 4 IV. Inventory and Evaluation of Stedman Historic District 6 History 6 Description and Inventory 9 C Evaluation of Significance and National Register Eligibility 16 D Proposed National Register Boundaries and Justification 16 V. Bibliography 38 1 I. INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY OF FINDINGS The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes to make improvements to NC 24 from 2.8 miles east of1-95 in Cumberland County to 1-40 in Duplin County. Within the past ten years, three historic architectural reports have been prepared for the project. In 1992 Mary L. Reeb drafted a Historic Architectural Survey Report for consultant Deleuw, Cather and Company, now Parsons Transportation Group (Parsons), which was rejected by the NCDOT as inadequate. In August 1997 Mary Pope Fun ofNCDOT prepared a Phase I (Reconnaissance) Historic Architectural Resources Survey Report. In July 1998 Scott Owen prepared a Phase II (Intensive) Historic Architectural Survey Report for NCDOT and Parsons. The Phase I report summarily identified the Stedman Historic District, along with other resources, as potentially eligible for listing in the National Register. The Phase II report evaluated the National Register eligibility of numerous resources within the project's Area of Potential Effect (APE). It further included a description of the physical environment of the APE and a historic and architectural background for Duplin, Sampson, and Cumberland counties. In February 2001 URS Corporation - Maryland (URS) entered into a contract with Parsons to prepare a focused addendum to the 1998 Phase II survey report. The contract called for the intensive-level survey of the previously identified Stedman Historic District. During the weeks of February 12 and 19,2001, Marvin A. Brown, senior architectural historian with URS, conducted fieldwork in Stedman and research in Fayetteville, Raleigh, Chapel Hill, and Stedman. Mr. Brown then prepared this report. URS agrees that there is a historic district in Stedman located on either side of the former alignment of the Cape Fear & Yadkin Valley Railroad. URS believes that this district has 29 principal resources, 22 of which contribute to the district and nine of which are noncontributing resources. 1 II. LIST OF FIGURES AND PLATES FIGURE TITLE PAGE 1 Project Locator Map 5 2 Proposed Stedman Historic District Resource Locator and Boundary Map . 18 PLATE TITLE PAGE 1 Cape Fear & Yadkin Valley Railroad Depot (193 Euclid Street), looking southeast 19 2 Acme Stores Fertilizer House (51** Front Street) and CF&YVRR alignment, looking east; railroad ties in foreground 19 3 Hub Everitt Store (204 Euclid Street) at left, Rural Electric Administration Office (200 Euclid) at left center, and John McMillan Store (207 Euclid) at far right, looking north 20 4 200 and 204 Euclid Street at right, 207 Euclid at left, and Sessoms House (5100 Jefferson Street) at left center, looking south 20 5 Later commercial buildings at 5102, 5070, and 5064 Front Street at left, looking southwest 21 6 Faircloth Mercantile Store (5050 Front Street) at left, manufactured house (210 Hillsboro Street) at center, and Stedman Baptist Church (200 Hillsboro Street) at right, looking southwest from park 21 7 Sessoms House (5100 Jefferson Street) at left, Methodist Parsonage (232 Euclid Street) at right, looking southwest 22 8 Rob Autry House (5026 Front Street) and outbuildings, looking west 22 9 D.P. Carter House (174 East Front Street) at right, Acme Stores Fertilizer House (51** Front Street) at left, looking northeast 23 10 Stedman Baptist Parsonage (227 Hillsboro Street) at left, Horne House (301 Hillsboro Street) at right, looking southeast 23 11 200 Hillsboro Street - east front and north side elevations; 210 Hillsboro Street at far left 24 12 218 Hillsboro Street - east front and north side elevations 24 13 217 Hillsboro Street - west front and north side elevations 25 14 227 Hillsboro Street - west front and south side elevations 25 15 301 Hillsboro Street - north front and west side elevations; observatory at far left 26 16 200 Euclid Street - east front and south side elevations; 5070 Front Street affixed to north side elevation at right 96 17 204 Euclid Street - east front and north side elevations 27 18 220 Euclid Street - east front and north side elevations 27 19 232 Euclid Street - east front and north side elevations 28 2 PLATE TITLE PAGE 70 312 Euclid Street - east front and south side elevations 28 21 1** Euclid Street, immediately north of 183 Euclid Street - looking northwest 29 22 183 Euclid Street - looking northeast 29 23 193 Euclid Street - looking northeast 30 24 203 Euclid Street - west front and north side elevations 30 25 207 Euclid Street - west front and south side elevations 31 26 311Euclid Street - west front and south side elevations 31 27 325 Euclid Street - west front and north side elevations 32 28 174 East First Street - south front and west side elevations 32 29 51** Front Street, immediately southeast of 193 Euclid Street - looking northwest 33 30 5026 Front Street - north front and east side elevations 33 31 5042 Front Street - north front and east side elevations 34 37 5050 Front Street - north front and east side elevations 34 33 5064 Front Street - north front and west side elevations 35 34 5102 Front Street - north front and west side elevations 35 35 5100 Jefferson Street - west front and south side elevations 36 36 5118 Jefferson Street - north front and west side elevations 36 37 5040 Blanche Street - north front and west side elevations 37 38 5050 Averitt Street - north front and east side elevations 37 3 III. METHODOLOGY The survey methodology for this project consisted of an intensive-level National Register evaluation of the Stedman Historic District in Cumberland County, North Carolina (Figure 1).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources State Historic Preservation Office David L
    North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources State Historic Preservation Office David L. S. Brook. Administrator Michael F. Easley, Governor Division of Historical Resources Lisbeth C. Evans, Secretary David J. Olson, Director Jeffrey J. Crow, Deputy Secretary May 23, 2003 MEMORANDUM TO: Greg Thorpe, Manager Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch NCDOT Division of Highways FROM: David Brook SUBJECT: Flistoric/Architectural Resources Survey Report, Widen US 221 from SR 1536 in Rutherford County to 1-40 in McDowell County, R-2597, Rutherford and McDowell Counties, CH02-10510 Thank you for your letter of April 29, 2003, transmitting the survey report by Frances P. Alexander of Mattson, Alexander and Associates. For purposes of compliance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act, we concur that the following properties are eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places under the criterion cited: William Monteith House, Gilkey, Rutherford County Albert Weaver Farm, Thermal City, Rutherford County B. G. Hensley House, Glenwood vicinity, McDowell County ; The William Monteirkliouse, west side of US 221, 0.1 mile north of SR 1351, Gilkey, RutherfasnaCounty,is-eligible,for the National Register ,under Criterion C for architecture. The Monteith _House is an especially fine expression of the Queen Anne style in Rutherford County-,.. We concur with the proposed National Register boundaries as described and delMeated.in the report. - The Albert Weaver Farm, west side of SR 1321-, 0.1 mile west of, US 221; Thermal City, Rutherford County, is eligible for the National Register underCriterion A for agriculture and Criterion C for .architecture-. The farmhouse and its collection of intact and in-place .
    [Show full text]
  • Transportation Planning for the Richmond–Charlotte Railroad Corridor
    VOLUME I Executive Summary and Main Report Technical Monograph: Transportation Planning for the Richmond–Charlotte Railroad Corridor Federal Railroad Administration United States Department of Transportation January 2004 Disclaimer: This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the Department of Transportation solely in the interest of information exchange. The United States Government assumes no liability for the contents or use thereof, nor does it express any opinion whatsoever on the merit or desirability of the project(s) described herein. The United States Government does not endorse products or manufacturers. Any trade or manufacturers' names appear herein solely because they are considered essential to the object of this report. Note: In an effort to better inform the public, this document contains references to a number of Internet web sites. Web site locations change rapidly and, while every effort has been made to verify the accuracy of these references as of the date of publication, the references may prove to be invalid in the future. Should an FRA document prove difficult to find, readers should access the FRA web site (www.fra.dot.gov) and search by the document’s title or subject. 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient's Catalog No. FRA/RDV-04/02 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date January 2004 Technical Monograph: Transportation Planning for the Richmond–Charlotte Railroad Corridor⎯Volume I 6. Performing Organization Code 7. Authors: 8. Performing Organization Report No. For the engineering contractor: Michael C. Holowaty, Project Manager For the sponsoring agency: Richard U. Cogswell and Neil E. Moyer 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10.
    [Show full text]
  • The Western North Carolina Railroad, 1855-1894
    THE WESTERN NORTH CAROLINA RAILROAD, 1855-1894 A thesis Presented to The Faculty of the Graduate School Western Carolina University In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts by William Hutson Abrams, Jr. August 6, 1976 PREFACE The Western North Carolina Railroad was the instrumental force in opening up the isolated communities of Western North Carolina. This paper will deal primarily with the construction of this railroad which left Salisbury, climbed the mountains to Asheville, and continued to ter.ninal points of Paint Rock and Ducktown, on the Tennessee Line. The difficulties encountered during construction will be emphasized along with the political aspects that went along with construction. Emphasis will be placed on the time between the State's acquisition of the Railroad in 1875 and the completion to Murphy in 1891. An introductory chapter will briefly cover the start of the railroad in 1855, its role in the Civil War, and the delays in construction caused by the scandals of the Reconstruction Period. Starting with 1875, a vital element in the construction, convict labor, will be dealt with. The management of the railroad varied between state and private ownership. It suffered the financial pains that many early lines endured. Most of all, it was hindered by the ever present problem presented by nature as the track was built through so~e of the roughest terrain east of the Rocky Mountains. This was really the significant feature of the railroad because at many times its further construction seemed to be impossible. Political, financial, managerial, and labor problems testify to the trying task that was accomplished and to the desire of the people of the western part of the state to have their railroad.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2014 Network for Economic Expansion Table of Contents
    ANNUAL REPORT 2014 NETWORK FOR ECONOMIC EXPANSION TABLE OF CONTENTS LETTER FROM THE CHAIRMAN .........................................................................................4 JOB CREATION FOR THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE..........................................................5 PURSUIT OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT .......................................................................6 ONGOING CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM IN PLACE .....................................7 STRATEGIC PLANNING: THE BLUEPRINT ......................................................................9 A MORE POWERFUL DRIVER OF PROSPERITY ...........................................................10 MEASURING ECONOMIC IMPACT .................................................................................... 11 BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND MANAGEMENT TEAM ................................................12 FINANCIAL REPORT...............................................................................................................13 NORTH CAROLINA RAILROAD COMPANY CORRIDOR MAP ..................................31 OUR MISSION: To develop the unique North Carolina Railroad assets for the good of the people of North Carolina. OUR VISION: To improve our state by: Enabling freight to grow business; Expanding rail to move people; Investing in North Carolina. HISTORY TELLS US THAT THE PURPOSE OF THE NORTH CAROLINA RAILROAD COMPANY’S CREATION 166 YEARS AGO WAS TO ENHANCE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT. IN 2014, THE COMPANY’S COMMITMENT TO SERVE THE PEOPLE OF NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SAME WAY
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2019
    ANNUAL REPORT 2019 NORTH CAROLINA RAILROAD COMPANY | ANNUAL REPORT 2019 | PAGE 1 OUR Putting the North Carolina Railroad Company to work for the MISSION good of the people of North Carolina. To improve our state by: OUR Enabling freight to grow business; VISION Expanding rail to move people; Investing in North Carolina. PAGE 2 | NORTH CAROLINA RAILROAD COMPANY | ANNUAL REPORT 2019 LETTER FROM THE CHAIRMAN 2019 was a productive year for the North Carolina Railroad Company. We maintained our focus on economic development — bringing attention to rail-served sites in every part of the state, as well as investing in freight rail infrastructure to assist in the recruitment or expansion of rail-served businesses across the state. We made significant investments in rail infrastructure including improvements to railroad bridges in Durham and Morrisville to address safety needs, while also planning for future growth of both freight and passenger service. We also began preparing for an important transition. Following more than three decades leading the North Carolina Railroad – President Scott Saylor is retiring July 2020. During his 31-year career with NCRR, Scott set a bold vision for the company, and oversaw impressive growth of the organization and the role it plays in rail-served economic development. As we look to the future, we will continue to make strategic investments in freight rail infrastructure both on and off the NCRR corridor to assist with economic development and job creation. We are studying future rail infrastructure needs to address connectivity of suburban and rural residential areas with high-density employment locations along the NCRR corridor.
    [Show full text]
  • A Brief History of the North Carolina Railroad Company
    A Brief History of the North Carolina Railroad Company The North Carolina Railroad Company (NCRR) owns and manages the 317-mile rail corridor that extends across 16 counties from the Port of Morehead City to Charlotte and impacts nearly a quarter of the state’s economy. The railroad carries 50-60 freight trains and 10 passenger trains daily. As the oldest extant private business corporation in the state, NCRR remains at the forefront of rail improvements and partnership development to promote job growth, and attract and retain rail-served industry in North Carolina. The North Carolina Railroad, chartered in 1849 as a 223-mile long corridor between Charlotte and Goldsboro, merged in 1989 with the Atlantic & North Carolina Railroad (A&NCRR) to create the current 317-mile long corridor between Charlotte and Morehead City, North Carolina. The Early Years: In 1848, the North Carolina legislature authorized an east to west railroad that would connect the coastal plain with the piedmont for the purpose of opening the state for economic and industrial development. The 1849 charter called for the NCRR to run “from the Wilmington and Raleigh Railroad where the same passes over the Neuse River in the county of Wayne, via Raleigh, and thence by the most practical route, via Salisbury, in the county of Rowan, to the town of Charlotte in the county of Mecklenburg.” Walter Gwynn, a native of Virginia, served as chief engineer of the line from 1850 to 1856 performing much of the initial surveying and planning for the railroad. NC Senate President Calvin Graves received the honor of lifting the first shovel of dirt at a groundbreaking ceremony in Greensboro on July 11, 1851.
    [Show full text]
  • North Carolina Railroad System Map-August 2019
    North Carolina !( Railroad System Clover !( !( South Boston Franklin Danville !( !( !( Mount Airy !( !( Clarksville Alleghany Eden !( Mayo Currituck Camden Ashe Hyco !( !( Gates !( Roanoke !( Conway Surry YVR Norlina Weldon R Stokes Rockingham Granville Rapids Elizabeth CA Caswell Person Vance !( Hertford City !( Roxboro Northampton !( Reidsville !( !( YVRR Oxford Henderson Warren Halifax !(Ahoskie VA Rural NC Watauga Wilkes !( Pasquotank Hall CA !( !( Erwin!( Yadkin Orange Kelford Chowan Perquimans North Durham Guilford !( N Franklin Avery Wilkesboro Forsyth !( Burlington Butner !( CDOT Mitchell ! Bertie !( Winston ! !(Hillsborough Franklinton Edenton Salem Greensboro Nash Caldwell ! Durham Rocky Midway !( High !( Wake Forest CLNA !(Taylorsville Iredell Davie ! Alamance !( ! Mount Yancey Lenoir Davidson Spring ! Madison !( Point Carrboro !( !( Tarboro Washington Alexander A Wake Burke C R Hope !( W C C T Zebulon Plymouth Tyrrell Y O !( Edgecombe !( Statesville !( D Cary CLNA Middlesex Lexington C !( !( !( Parmele Dare N ! W ! W Martin s Buncombe !( Hickory ! S !( S ain Chatham Raleigh Wendell t S n McDowell !( Morganton S !(Apex ! ou CMLX Marion !( k !Wilson M c rk Asheboro NHVX ky a Haywood !( !( o Pitt o P T Newton ! A l Salisbury n !( Wilson f m a O New Hll l !(Clayton N S n Old Fort Catawba !( L CLNA D t o m i CMIZ Denton u a t !( CLNA C C Greenville re a BLU Rowan Randolph u !( N Asheville G G N C !( W !( !( Belhaven Swain !( S !( Fuquay-Varina !( S !( Waynesville BLU A ! Washington !( GSM Lincoln Lincolnton ! T Selma Chocowinity
    [Show full text]
  • Is the North Carolina Railroad on the Right Track
    Karen Tam Summary In the fall of 1994, the state announced the terms of a tentative new lease with Norfolk Southern Corporation for the North Carolina Railroad-a 317-mile rail line that arcs across the state from Morehead City through Goldsboro, Raleigh, and Greensboro to Charlotte. The state owns 75 percent of the railroad and private shareholders own 25 percent. Announcing a lease agreement ended months of speculation about how much the state would improve on a 99-year lease (1895 to 1994) that returned less than l percent on today's dollar-a figure history had proven to be ridicu- lously low. The tentative agreement included a substantially higher lease rate, plus plans to reorganize the railroad as a real estate investment trust to escape state and federal taxes and thus increase its return to investors. But as quickly as the new lease was announced, it was denounced by the private shareholders. They complained they had been low-balled again and continued to maintain that the state has a conflict of interest that forces it to keep lease rates low at their expense. Private shareholders moved quickly to try and block the agreement. Four separate lawsuits were filed, and another group of shareholders launched a boycott of the meeting at which the new lease agreement would be proposed for approval. The state's primary interest is in keeping the rail line open and operating for economic developmentpurposes-even the less profitable links such as the line between Goldsboro and Morehead City. Longer term, the state sees a role for the railroad in upgrading passenger service between Charlotte and Raleigh, provid- ing commuter service for rapidly growing urban areas such as the Research Triangle Park region, and even providing a corridorforfuturistic high-speed rail.
    [Show full text]
  • Petersen Approval Copy of Dissertation4
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by The University of North Carolina at Greensboro PETERSEN, KERI T., Ph.D. The North Carolina Railroad, Industrial Slavery, and the Economic Development of North Carolina. (2017) Directed by Dr. Watson W. Jennison. 241 pp. During the first half of the nineteenth century, western North Carolina leaders fought a sectional political battle against an eastern-led legislature to gain political power and construct the North Carolina Railroad (NCRR) through the Piedmont. Over the course of westerners’ push for internal improvements and the successful construction of the NCRR, western leaders grew from a marginal group on the periphery of North Carolina’s economy to controlling the future trajectory of the state’s economic development. The NCRR Company’s directors and contractors employed thousands of hired slaves to construct the railroad from 1851-1856, and hundreds more to maintain and operate trains, tracks, and facilities from 1856 through the end of the Civil War. The economic benefits of the new railroad combined with the opportunity to profit from regular slave hiring, extended the benefits of slavery to all classes of North Carolina’s slaveholders, and created jobs and economic opportunities for all white North Carolinians. The enslaved men who were hired out to the NCRR performed all of the hard labor that made the NCRR a reality. Slave hire contracts between masters and the company ripped these men away from their home farms and plantations, and sentenced them to a brutal existence in the NCRR’s labor camps—a place void of slave families and communities, and characterized by inadequate food, shelter, clothing, and medical attention.
    [Show full text]
  • CHAPTER 7 Freight Element
    GREENSBORO URBAN AREA 2040 Metropolitan Transportation Plan CHAPTER 7 5. Better define the national freight system; Freight Element 6. Strengthen the freight component of the planning process; In recognition of the key role that freight transportation 7. Develop a plan for the reorganization of the plays in the Piedmont Triad region the Burlington- DOT; Graham, Greensboro, High Point, and Winston-Salem 8. The marine transportation and ports need a Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPOs) are stronger voice to speak to their needs in the undertaking a Regional approach to the Metropolitan national interest; Transportation Plan (MTP) to develop a framework for an integrated freight planning document in their respective 9. Embrace private sector participation; areas. 10. Raise revenue (10 Steps to an Effective National Over the last several years, the Piedmont Triad has become Freight Policy, 2012). increasingly focused on freight transportation planning This chapter describes existing conditions and trends since the loss of textile manufacturing and a shift to for the nation, state, and Piedmont Triad study area major Freight and Goods Movement Industry. The goals and identifies their current and future issues. NC ports guiding regional freight planning and investment are: and airports are included, followed by a summary of • Provide a safe freight transportation system that key points and a list of recommendations. The chapter sustains or improves existing levels of freight discusses both highway freight and rail freight. Many of access and mobility; the issues and trends differ between the highway mode and the rail freight mode and are discussed separately. • Support the region’s economic well-being, while However, the two modes are closely linked and there are remaining sensitive to environmental needs and cross-cutting issues.
    [Show full text]
  • Protecting and Preserving Rail Corridors Against Encroachment of Incompatible Uses
    Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient’s Catalog No. FHWA/TX-09/0-5546-1 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date Protecting and Preserving Rail Corridors Against Encroachment September 2007; Rev. January 2008 of Incompatible Uses 6. Performing Organization Code 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. Lisa Loftus-Otway, C. Michael Walton, Lynn Blais, Nathan 0-5546-1 Hutson 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS) Center for Transportation Research 11. Contract or Grant No. The University of Texas at Austin 0-5546 3208 Red River, Suite 200 Austin, TX 78705-2650 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period Covered Texas Department of Transportation Technical Report Research and Technology Implementation Office September 2006–August 2007 P.O. Box 5080 14. Sponsoring Agency Code Austin, TX 78763-5080 15. Supplementary Notes Project performed in cooperation with the Texas Department of Transportation and the Federal Highway Administration. 16. Abstract Rail Corridor preservation and planning for the purpose of reducing or restricting incompatible development is an area of growing importance. This report provides an overview regarding encroachment and the elements that contribute to potentially incompatible development along rail corridors. The report reviews the legal tools that currently exist within Texas for corridor preservation and provides recommendations for new legislation, including draft legislation. The report then reviews the state of practice of corridor planning and preservation with mitigation against encroachment both in Texas and in selected other states around the country. The report pays special attention to incidents in which rail corridors are envisioned to host both freight and passenger services and the implications on land use.
    [Show full text]
  • NC Truck Network Model Development Research
    i NCDOT HWY 2006-09 NC Truck Network Model Development Research John R. Stone, PhD Professor Department of Civil, Construction & Environmental Engineering North Carolina State University Raleigh, NC 27695-7908 Bing Mei, MS, PE Senior Research Associate Triangle Regional Model Service Bureau Institute for Transportation Research & Education North Carolina State University Raleigh, NC 27695-8601 Alixandra Demers, PhD Bharath Paladugu, MS Research Associate Graduate Research Assistant Department of Civil, Construction & Environmental Engineering North Carolina State University Raleigh, NC 27695-7908 Prepared for the North Carolina Department of Transportation February 2009 Final Report ii iii Report No. Government Accession No. Recipient’s Catalog No. NCDOT 2006-09 …leave blank… …leave blank… 4. Title and Subtitle Report Date NC Truck Network Model Development Research September 2008 Performing Organization Code …leave blank… Author(s) Performing Organization Report John R. Stone, Bing Mei, Alixandra Demers, Bharath Paladugu No.…leave blank… Performing Organization Name and Address Work Unit No. (TRAIS) Department of Civil, Construction & Environmental Engineering, …leave blank… NC State University, Raleigh NC 27695-7908 Triangle Regional Model Service Bureau, ITRE, NC State University, Raleigh NC 27695-8601 Contract or Grant No. …leave blank… Sponsoring Agency Name and Address Type of Report and Period North Carolina Department of Transportation Covered Final Report Transportation Planning Branch July 1, 2005 - June 30, 2008 1 South Wilmington Street Raleigh, North Carolina 27601 Sponsoring Agency Code NCDOT Project HWY 2006-09 Supplementary Notes:…leave blank… Abstract This research develops a validated prototype truck traffic network model for North Carolina. The model includes all counties and metropolitan areas of North Carolina and major economic areas throughout the U.S.
    [Show full text]