Her Majesty Object

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Her Majesty Object HER MAJESTY OBJECT : JUSTICE FOR ELISABETH 11 CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY QUEEN OF ENGLAND DISAPPEARANCE AND DEATH BUCKINGHAM PALACE OF 100,000 DUPLESSIS ORPHANS LONDON, ENGLAND IN THE PROVINCE OF QUEBEC, CANADA DATE : 1st of September 2005 Your Majesty, my reason for writing this letter to the government of England, the name of King George V1 appears on my wife’s medical file, and we want to know if your government was mixed into the Duplessis Orphans case which is the biggest institutionalize case of child abuse in North America. This letter is of extreme importance concerning the disappearance and death of at least 100,000 innocent children during the 40’s, 50’s, 60’s and the 70’s, who were falsely labelled mentally ill and were illegally interned in Quebec’s psychiatric hospitals and used as guinea pigs for medical experiences. It has been proven that the orphans were: electro shocked, put into cells, straitjacketed, tortured, chained, whipped, forced labour, ice cold baths, sexually abused, sodomized, experimental drugs such as chlorpromazine, in Quebec it is called (Largactil) and Thorazine in the United States, and were lobotomized by criminal psychiatrists having no concern for human life. Documents show that the orphans were buried on the Saint-Jean de Dieu psychiatric hospital grounds called “The Pig Sty Cemetery”, which was next to a pig farm, and slaughter house and animal carcasses were thrown into the same hole with the children, who did not receive any kind of decent burial. Each psychiatric hospital had it’s cemetery, thousands of kids who died from medical experiences, were sold to universities, and would be returned and buried in cardboard boxes or just piled one on top of each other, some orphans were burned in the hospital incinerator with the garbage. Your Majesty, we have documents and testimony that the Duplessis Orphans were experimented on by Nazi War Criminals, who were living here in Quebec, and psychiatrist Denis Lazure who still practices at the Saint Jean de Dieu hospital, and was member of the Quebec government, should have been charged for aiding to keep in Quebec a french traitor Count Jacques de Bernonville who was Nazi Klaus Barbie’s right hand man, Lazure and psychiatrist Camille Laurin was also member of the Quebec government, also signed a 1950 petition to keep Jacques de Bernonville here Quebec. I would like to point out during an oral question period at the House of Commons in Ottawa, Tuesday 5 November 1996 (097) the ex-Prime Minister of Canada Jean Chrétien, was confronted in parliament by the opposition leader about a Jean Louis Roux who was Lieutenant Governor of Quebec at the time, and Chrétien stood up to support Governor Roux who was attacked by the opposition about his pass, and mister Chrétien stated : “I offered him a seat as an independent. And, if we need to go poking into everyone’s lives, could the leader of the Opposition tell me why people like Camille Laurin and Denis Lazure were in Mr. Levesques’s cabinet, when they had defended Count Jacques de Bernonville, the right hand man to Klaus Barbie in Europe”?. Doctor Denis Lazure admits in his own biography that he participated doing psychiatric experiments on orphans at the Saint Jean de Dieu, along with five other doctors in the 1950’s, stating that he and his colleagues would start there morning by pushing the button on the the electric box and would put a dozen or more orphans in a epileptic coma, and then they would go to the insulin room, and would inject a dozen or more with insulin and put them in a coma, after a couple hours, they would go back and inject them with glucose, some would wake up, and Lazure states that we would get a surprise that some did not wake up. To me this murder. Lazure also admitted going to work at the Douglas psychiatric hospital with German doctor Heinz Lehmann in 1952, and both done horrific experiences on the orphans. I must specify that the Canadian government never once checked out Dr. Heinz Lehmann’s credentials, and did not verify who was Heinz Lehmann, and what role did he play in the Nazi army? He arrived here in 1937 from Germany, and practiced psychiatry for 26 years without a licence, and received millions of dollars from the Canadian government and the Quebec government, and also tons of awards for his horrific psychiatric experiments on children. At the time, anyone wanting a licence to practice psychiatry, all they had to do was to go and meet with Ewen Cameron at the Allan Memorial Institute in Montreal, and he would write out temporary papers and anybody could practice psychiatry, like it was the case of Heinz Lehmann, who practiced with a six month paper that Ewen Cameron wrote out for him, and he worked for 26years with this piece of paper doing horrific experiences on the Duplessis Orphans with aid of his assistant psychiatrist Denis Lazure in 1952. I must specify, that all orphanages and all hospitals were under the sole control of the Roman Catholic Church, who were sole proprietors of each institutions, and could hire or fire who ever they well pleased, until the Nun’s sold back the hospitals to the Quebec government in the mid seventy’s. Both doctor Denis Lazure and doctor Camille Laurin had took trips behind the iron curtain; why? Lazure was once stopped at the United States border for having taken these trips behind the iron curtain, and a couple of weeks later, got a visit from the Royal Canadian Mounted Police, who questioned him about his travels to Germany. Both Lazure and Laurin were ministers of health in the Quebec government, both done experiences on the Duplessis Orphans. These two persons were never charged or never brought to trial for their crimes done on children during the 50’s, 60’s, and 70’s. We have testimony from a psychiatrist Louis Roy, who is still living and was the director of a psychiatric hospital called Saint Michel Archange kepted a man imprisoned in this hospital for a period of 25 years, and stated publicly to orphan J.S., “you were never crazy”. This doctor was never held accountable for his actions towards this poor man who had his life ruined completely, and thousands others who suffered the same fate. He also stated “That’s the way it was in those times”. Coming from Dr. Roy, does this mean that it was O.K. to do criminal acts on the Duplessis Orphans in those times? The Quebec’s own ombudsman lawyer Daniel Jacoby stated concerning the Duplessis Orphans case in 1999, that there is a conspiracy of silence and corruption in the Quebec government. In 1992, the Quebec government demanded a police inquiry into the orphans case, the police had visited many orphans through out the province of Quebec, and decided to stop after having 321 criminal charges from the complainants the Duplessis Orphans, but, after the police had deposited the 321 criminal charges at the crown prosecutor of Quebec’s office, it’s from this point, that the corruption started in the minister of justice departement of Quebec, and the police were told to shut up, and the crown prosecutor stated that there was no criminality in this case, and shut the door on the orphans plight for justice,and this case still has not gone before a court of law, hundreds of survivors still carry the false label of mentally ill on their shoulders, and this alone is a criminal act. Doctor Jean Gaudreau, stated to the newspapers and television that as a young intern in 1961, on his very first day of work, at the Mont-Providence psychiatric hospital, had on his list a young child less than 5 years old to evaluate, but on entering the room with the Mother superior of the Nun’s, remarked that the child was in a straitjacket and chained to the sink pipes, Gaudreau did not report this to the authorities, he kept silent for thirty five years, he also should be held accountable for witnessing horrible crimes done to kids, and turned his back without reporting this to the police. In 2001, the Quebec’s national reconciliation program rewarded this doctor and bought his silence for a million dollars, they gave him a job at a thousand dollars a day. The Mont-Providence psychiatric hospital was an orphanage and school for both girls and boys, but its vocation changed over night, the children’s rooms were changed into cells, the orphans who had occupied the rooms, over night were all labelled mentally ill. We have recent testimony from a janitor, who saw orphans in cages at the Mont- Providence psychiatric hospital in 1973 when Dr. Denis Lazure was Director. A big scandal hit Quebec in 1961 involving psychiatrist Camille Laurin who later became minister of health of Quebec, the Bédard Commission was created to cover up the horrific treatments that the orphans were getting inside Quebec’s psychiatric hospitals and to save Dr. Camille Laurin. The commission was presided by Dr. Dominique Bédard, Dr. Charles Roberts, and Dr. Denis Lazure. In 2001, forty years later another scandal concerning the Duplessis Orphans hit the Quebec government, the premier of Quebec called in his dear friend Dr. Denis Lazure (the same) to cover up the scandal in 2001 and humiliate the orphans to extreme. I should mention at this time that Joseph James Martin Sr. was Minister of National Health and Welfare of Canada from 1948 to 1957, and had negotiated directly with the Sister’s of Providence, who were the sole proprietors of the Mont-Providence psychiatric hospital.
Recommended publications
  • Report of the Auditor General of Canada to the Minister of Canadian Heritage
    20072007 Report of the Auditor General of Canada to the Minister of Canadian Heritage JUNE Use of Public Funds by the Former Lieutenant-Governor of Quebec Office of the Auditor General of Canada The Report is available on our Web site at www.oag-bvg.gc.ca. For copies of the Report or other Office of the Auditor General publications, contact Office of the Auditor General of Canada 240 Sparks Street, Stop 10-1 Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0G6 Telephone: 613-952-0213, ext. 5000, or 1-888-761-5953 Fax: 613-943-5485 Hearing impaired only TTY: 613-954-8042 Email: [email protected] Ce document est également publié en français. © Minister of Public Works and Government Services Canada 2007 Cat. No. FA3-46/2007 ISBN 978-0-662-69881-4 Auditor General of Canada Vérificatrice générale du Canada To the Honourable Speaker of the House of Commons, To the Honourable Minister of Canadian Heritage, I have the honour to transmit herewith my Report on the audit that was conducted under section 11 of the Auditor General Act on the public funds provided to the former Lieutenant-Governor of Quebec. Sheila Fraser, FCA Auditor General of Canada OTTAWA, 12 June 2007 Use of Public Funds by the Former Lieutenant-Governor of Quebec Table of Contents Main Points 1 Introduction 5 Duties of a Lieutenant-Governor 5 Provenance of public funds granted to lieutenant-governors 6 Roles and responsibilities of the organizations concerned 6 Focus of the audit 7 Observations and Recommendations 8 The former Lieutenant-Governor of Quebec’s expenses 8 The federal government distinguished
    [Show full text]
  • COMPOSITION RÉCENTE DU CORPS POLITIQUE 895 Ministre
    COMPOSITION RÉCENTE DU CORPS POLITIQUE 895 Ministre délégué à l'Aménagement et au Développement Ministre de l'Industrie et du Commerce, l'hon. Frank S. régional et président du Comité ministériel permanent de Miller l'aménagement et du développement régional, l'hon. Ministre de l'Agriculture et de l'Alimentation, l'hon. François Gendron Dennis R. Timbrell Ministre des Relations internationales et ministre du Ministre de l'Éducation et ministre des Collèges et des Commerce extérieur, l'hon. Bernard Landry Universités, l'hon. Bette Stephenson, M.D. Ministre de la Main-d'oeuvre et de la Sécurité du revenu Procureur général, l'hon. Roy McMurtry, CR. et vice-présidente du Conseil du Trésor, l'hon. Pauline Marois Ministre de la Santé, l'hon. Keith C. Norton, CR. Ministre de l'Énergie et des Ressources, l'hon. Yves Ministre des Services sociaux et communautaires, l'hon. Duhaime Frank Drea Ministre délégué aux Relations avec les citoyens, l'hon. Trésorier provincial et ministre de l'Économie, l'hon. Denis Lazure Larry Grossman, CR. Ministre des Transports, l'hon. Jacques Léonard Président du conseil d'administration du Cabinet et président du Cabinet, l'hon. George McCague Ministre de l'Agriculture, des Pêcheries et de l'Alimentation, l'hon. Jean Garon Ministre du Tourisme et des Loisirs, l'hon. Reuben Baetz Ministre de l'Habitation et de la Protection du Ministre de la Consommafion et du Commerce, l'hon. consommateur, l'hon. Guy Tardif Robert G. Elgie, M.D. Ministre des Affaires culturelles, l'hon. Clément Richard Secrétaire provincial à la Justice, l'hon.
    [Show full text]
  • Journal Des Débats
    journal des Débats Le vendredi 17 décembre 1976 Vol. 18 — No 4 Table des matières Présentation de motions non annoncées Motion pour faire siéger la Chambre le lundi 20 décembre 65 Vote sur la motion 65 Projets de loi au nom du gouvernement Projet de loi no 82 — Loi concernant le déficit olympique de la ville de Montréal et modifiant la charte de la ville de Montréal Première lecture 65 Déclaration ministérielle Politique linguistique du gouvernement 66 M. Camille Laurin 66 M. Fernand Lalonde 66 Vaccin contre la grippe porcine 67 M. Denis Lazure 67 M. Victor Goldbloom 67 Dépôt de documents Documents relatifs aux tests linguistiques 68 Rapport annuel de l'Université du Québec 68 Rapport annuel de l'Office de la construction du Québec 68 Rapport annuel de la Commission de la fonction publique 68 Rapport annuel de la Société d'aménagement de l'Outaouais 68 Rapport annuel de la Commission des transports 69 Questions des députés Tenue du référendum 69 Propriétaires de boisés privés 71 Entente avec les Cris de la baie James 72 Propriétaires de petits abattoirs 73 Centrales hydroélectriques de l'Alcan 73 Avenir des installations olympiques 75 Hausse du salaire minimum 76 Reprise du débat sur le message inaugural M. René Lévesque 77 M. Raymond Garneau 86 M. George Springate 91 M. Robert Lamontagne 92 M. William Frederic Shaw 94 M. Yvon Brochu 96 Vote sur la motion de censure de M. Gérard D. Lévesque 98 Vote sur la motion de censure de M. Rodrigue Biron 98 Etude des crédits supplémentaires Commission plénière 99 Travaux parlementaires 107 Ajournement 120 65 (Dix heures quinze minutes) Excusez.
    [Show full text]
  • Government 95
    Government 95 Minister responsible for Energy, Hon. Guy Minister of Cultural Affairs and Minister of Joron Communications, Hon. Louis O'Neill Minister of Consumer Affairs, Co-operatives Minister of Natural Resources and Minister of and Financial Institutions, Hon. Lise Payette Lands and Forests, Hon. Yves Bérubé Minister of Agriculture, Hon. Jean Garon Minister of Industry and Commerce, Hon. Minister of Social Affairs, Hon. Denis Lazure Rodrigue Tremblay Minister of Municipal Affairs, Hon. Guy Tardif Minister of Tourism, Fish and Game, Hon. Minister of Labour and Manpower, Hon. Yves Duhaime Pierre-Marc Johnson Public Service Minister and Vice-Président of Minister of Immigration, Hon. Jacques Couture the Treasury Board, Hon. Denis De Belleval Minister of Public Works and Supply, Hon. Jocelyne Ouellette. Ontario 3.3.1.6 The government of Ontario consists of a lieutenant-governor, an executive council and a Législative Assembly. In April 1974 the Honourable Pauline McGibbon took office as lieutenant-governor. The Législative Assembly is composed of 125 members elected for a statutory term not to exceed five years, At the provincial élection June 9, 1977, 58 Progressive Conservatives, 34 Libérais and 33 New Democrats were elected to the province's 3Ist Législature. In addition to the regular ministries are the following provincial agencies: the Niagara Parks Commission, the Ontario Municipal Board, Ontario Hydro, the St. Lawrence Development Commission, the Ontario Northland Transportation Commis­ sion, the Liquor Control Board and the Liquor Licence Board. Under the provisions of the Législative Assembly Act (RSO 1970, c.240 as amended) each member of the assembly is paid an annual indemnity of $15,000 and an expense allowance of $7,500.
    [Show full text]
  • Journal Des Débats
    journal des Débats Commission permanente du travail et de la main-d'oeuvre Projet de loi no 17 — Loi sur la santé et la sécurité au travail (1) Présentation de mémoires Le 4 septembre 1979 — No 170 Table des matières Remarques préliminaires M. Pierre-Marc Johnson B-7779 M. Pierre Marois B-7779 M. Michel Pagé B-7784 M. Yvon Brochu B-7790 Réponse du ministre B-7794 Mémoires Association des hôpitaux de la province de Québec et Association des directeurs de départements de santé communautaires B-7796 Association de médecine industrielle du Québec B-7818 Association pour l'hygiène industrielle B-7833 Professionnels des départements de santé communautaire B-7842 Intervenants M. Alain Marcoux, président M. Laurent Lavigne, président suppléant M. Pierre-Marc Johnson M. Denis Lazure M. Michel Pagé M. Pierre Marois M. Yvon Brochu M. Jean-Pierre Jolivet M. Guy Chevrette Mme Thérèse Lavoie-Roux M. Gilbert Paquette *M. Paul Pleau, Association des hôpitaux et Association des directeurs de départements de santé communautaire *M. Jean-Paul Fortin, idem *M. Roger Cadieux, idem *M. Gaston Pellan, idem *M. Normand Choinière, idem *M. Jean-Paul Couture, Association de médecine industrielle du Québec *M. Michel Lesage, idem *M. Guy Paquet, idem *M. Jacques Laflamme, idem *M. Lorne Cassidy, idem *M. Raymond Moisan, Association pour l'hygiène industrielle *M. Jacques Normandeau, idem *M. Marcel Laferrière, idem *M. Raymond Roberge, professionnels des départements de santé communautaire *M. Paul Lachance, idem *M. Yves Morissette, idem *Témoins interrogés par les membres de la commission parlementaire B-7779 Projet de loi no 17 ministre d'Etat au développement social, qui, pour les fins de cette loi, dirigera les travaux de la Présentation de mémoires commission, étant donné que le projet de loi no 17, comme on le sait, a été, en collaboration avec (Dix heures dix-huit minutes) mon collègue des Affaires sociales et moi-même, dirigé par le ministre d'Etat au développement Le Président (M.
    [Show full text]
  • La Réforme Institutionnelle De La Fonction Publique De 1983 : Contexte, Contenu Et Enjeux James Iain Gow
    Document generated on 10/01/2021 1:03 p.m. Politique La réforme institutionnelle de la fonction publique de 1983 : contexte, contenu et enjeux James Iain Gow La réforme des institutions politiques Number 6, automne 1984 URI: https://id.erudit.org/iderudit/040461ar DOI: https://doi.org/10.7202/040461ar See table of contents Publisher(s) Société québécoise de science politique ISSN 0711-608X (print) 1918-6584 (digital) Explore this journal Cite this article Gow, J. I. (1984). La réforme institutionnelle de la fonction publique de 1983 : contexte, contenu et enjeux. Politique, (6), 51–101. https://doi.org/10.7202/040461ar Tous droits réservés © Société québécoise de science politique, 1984 This document is protected by copyright law. Use of the services of Érudit (including reproduction) is subject to its terms and conditions, which can be viewed online. https://apropos.erudit.org/en/users/policy-on-use/ This article is disseminated and preserved by Érudit. Érudit is a non-profit inter-university consortium of the Université de Montréal, Université Laval, and the Université du Québec à Montréal. Its mission is to promote and disseminate research. https://www.erudit.org/en/ La réforme institutionnelle de la fonction publique de 1983: contexte, contenu et enjeux James Iain Gow Université de Montréal Le 21 décembre 1983 l'Assemblée nationale du Québec adopta une nouvelle Loi sur la fonction publique. Celle-ci vise à alléger le contrôle central exercé sur les gestionnaires afin de permettre à ceux-ci d'assumer plus de responsabilités pour la qualité des services offerts aux citoyens ainsi que pour l'économie et l'efficacité de leurs services.
    [Show full text]
  • Québec's Historical Position on the Federal Spending Power 1944-1998
    PositionEng QUÉBEC'S HISTORICAL POSITION ON THE FEDERAL SPENDING POWER 1944-1998 Secrétariat aux Affaires intergouvernementales canadiennes Direction des politiques institutionnelles et constitutionnelles Ministère du Conseil exécutif July 1998 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 1. Governments of Mr. Maurice Duplessis and Mr. Paul Sauvé (1944-1960) A. General position regarding the federal spending power B. Illustration of Québec's position on education, health and social services a) Shared-cost programs b) Family allowances c) Grants to universities 2. Government of Mr. Jean Lesage (1960-1966) A. General position regarding the federal spending power B. Illustration of Québec's position on education, health and social services a) Schooling allowances and the student loans and bursaries program b) The pension plan c) Québec's withdrawal from "established" shared-cost programs http://www.cex.gouv.qc.ca/saic/english.htm (1 sur 42) [2001-05-04 08:43:07] PositionEng 3. Governments of Mr. Daniel Johnson (senior) and Mr. Jean-Jacques Bertrand (1966-1970) A. General position regarding the federal spending power B. Illustration of Québec's position on education, health and social services a) Education b) Health and social services 4. First government of Mr. Robert Bourassa (1970-1976) A. General position regarding the federal spending power B. Illustration of Québec's position on education, health and social services a) Social policy b) Health insurance 5. Governments of Mr. René Lévesque and Mr. Pierre Marc Johnson (1976-1985) A. General position regarding the federal spending power B. Illustration of Québec's position on education, health and social services a) Health and social services b) Education 6.
    [Show full text]
  • La Réforme Du Mode De Scrutin Au Québec :Une Perspective Néo-Institutionnaliste
    UNIVERSITÉ DU QUÉBEC À MONTRÉAL LA RÉFORME DU MODE DE SCRUTIN AU QUÉBEC :UNE PERSPECTIVE NÉO-INSTITUTIONNALISTE MÉMOIRE PRÉSENTÉ COMME EXIGENCE PARTIELLE DE LA MAÎTRISE EN SCIENCE POLITIQUE PAR JULIEN YERVILLE JUIN 2018 UNIVERSITÉ DU QUÉBEC À MONTRÉAL Service des bibliothèques Avertissement La diffusion de ce mémoire se fait dans le respect des droits de son auteur, qui a signé le formulaire Autorisation de reproduire et de diffuser un travail de recherche de cycles supérieurs (SDU-522 - Rév.1 0-2015). Cette autorisation stipule que «conformément à l'article 11 du Règlement no 8 des études de cycles supérieurs, [l'auteur] concède à l'Université du Québec à Montréal une licence non exclusive d'utilisation et de publication de la totalité ou d'une partie importante de [son] travail de recherche pour des fins pédagogiques et non commerciales. Plus précisément, [l'auteur] autorise l'Université du Québec à Montréal à reproduire, diffuser, prêter, distribuer ou vendre des copies de [son] travail de recherche à des fins non commerciales sur quelque support que ce soit, y compris l'Internet. Cette licence et cette autorisation n'entraînent pas une renonciation de [la] part [de l'auteur] à [ses] droits moraux ni à [ses] droits de propriété intellectuelle. Sauf entente contraire, [l'auteur] conserve la liberté de diffuser et de commercialiser ou non ce travail dont [il] possède un exemplaire.» REMERCIEMENTS J'ai entrepris la maîtrise sans me douter de l'expérience que j'allais vivre et de tout le travail qui serait nécessaire pour cheminer jusqu'au dépôt de ce mémoire. Maintenant que je suis à 1'heure des bilans, je veux prendre le temps de remercier ici les principales personnes qui m'ont appuyé à travers ces années.
    [Show full text]
  • Ex LIBRIS UNIVERSITATIS ALBERTENSIS I ¿ T O F Pe, P*J P7l 1777- 7^ Gouvernement Du Québec Public Accounts for the Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 1978
    Ex LIBRIS UNIVERSITATIS ALBERTENSIS I ¿ t o f Pe, P*J P7l 1777- 7^ gouvernement du Québec public accounts for the fiscal year ended March 31, 1978 volume 2 details of expenditure Published in accordance with the provisions of section 71 of the Loi de l’administration financière (Financial Administration Act) (1970 Statutes, Chapter 17) Received MAÏ 2? 1575 RECTOR 4 Gouvernement ELLOR du Québec Ministère des Finances ISSN 0706-2850 ISBN 0-7754-3205-9 Legal deposit, 1s' quarter, 1979 Bibliothèque nationale du Québec UNIVERSITY LIERARY UNIVERSITY OF Al BFRTA TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION LIST OF SUPPLIERS AND BENEFICIARIES 1 LIST OF CAPITAL ASSETS 2 1-1 SECTION LIST OF SUPPLIERS AND BENEFICIARIES For each category of expenditure, except for "Transfer expen­ With regard to the category "Transfer expenses", the list of ses", the list of suppliers or beneficiaries is issued by department beneficiaries is published, in certain cases, grouped by program according to the following publishing limits and criteria: or by element of program and, in other cases, grouped by department, and this, according to the following limits and crite­ a) Salaries, wages, allowances and other remuneration: ria: — Ministers, Deputy Ministers and Public Officers of equiva­ — By electoral district: complete listing; lent rank: complete listing; — By electoral district and beneficiary: complete listing; — Managerial Staff (managers, assistant managers and civil servants of equivalent rank): complete listing; — By beneficiary only: $8 000 and over. — Any allowance: $8 000
    [Show full text]
  • Les Référendums Au Québec : Bibliographie
    MICHEL LÉVESQUE MARTIN PELLETIER BIBLIOTHÈQUE DE L’ASSEMBLÉE NATIONALE DU QUÉBEC LES RÉFÉRENDUMS AU QUÉBEC : BIBLIOGRAPHIE Michel Lévesque Martin Pelletier Bibliothèque de l’Assemblée nationale du Québec Juillet 2005 Table des matières Présentation …………………………………………………………………………………….………………...p. 5 Études générales ……………………………………………………………………………………………….. p. 7 Le référendum du 10 avril 1919 ……………………………………………………………………………..…p. 9 Bulletin de vote …………………………………………………………………………………..…….. p. 10 Synopsis des résultats et des dépenses …………………………………………………………….. p. 10 Études générales …………………………………………………………………………………...….. p. 11 Le référendum du 20 mai 1980 ……………………………………………………………………………..… p. 13 Bulletin de vote ………………………………………………………………………………………… p. 14 Synopsis des résultats et des dépenses ………………………………………………………..…… p. 15 Ouvrages de référence ……………………………………………………………………………...… p. 16 Études générales …………………………………………………………………………………...…. p. 17 Le référendum du 26 octobre 1992 ………………………………………………………………………….. p. 29 Bulletin de vote ………………………………………………………………………………………. p. 30 Synopsis des résultats et des dépenses …………………………………………………………….. p. 31 Ouvrages de référence ……………………………………………………………………………...… p. 32 Documents officiels ………………………………………………………………………………...….. p. 32 Documents publiés par le Comité du Non ...…………………………………………………………. p. 34 Études générales …………………………………………………………………………………….… p. 34 Le référendum du 30 octobre 1995 ………………………………………………………………………..… p. 49 Bulletin de vote ………………………………………………………………………………………… p. 50 Synopsis des résultats et des dépenses …………………………………………………………..…
    [Show full text]
  • Survey Highlights Commissioned by the Monarchist League of Canada
    Commissioned by the Monarchist League of Canada & a complete revision of a survey first issued in 1999 Written by Gavin McGill Guthrie & John Aimers Principal research by Gavin McGill Guthrie This survey, the third to be completed, is Survey Highlights particularly pertinent given certain ‘controversies’ which emerged in the media since 2002, through ● Canada’s Royal Family and Vice-Regal officeholders undertake over 4000 engagements a year various articles and reports focusing on the previous Governor General’s spending. Almost ● A visibly expanded Governor Generalcy that recalls Canada’s history, reflects Canada’s present all of these criticized the Rt. Hon. Adrienne and affirms Canada’s distinct identity into the future, served Canada’s Oct. 2004 population of Clarkson for squandering taxpayers’ money on 32,040,300 at a cost of $1.28 per person. lavish “junkets” and society parties. Using this for political advantage, a number of politicians ● Lieutenant Governors’ Offices were assisted in their service to the Crown, and so to Canada’s Oct. joined in the chorus against the sitting Governor 2004 population of 32,040,300, at a cost to the federal government of 25 cents per person. General. However, in reality these reports and actions, as well as the ensuing anger they stirred ● In the second edition of this study, undertaken in 2002, based on the official government up in the Canadian populace, only served to Estimates, it was reported that the cost of the Canadian Crown for 2001-02 totaled $34,127,653. illustrate just how unaware Canadians and Based on a July 1, 2001, population of 31,081,500, we calculated that the cost of the Crown was parliamentarians were about the roles and duties $1.10 per Canadian.
    [Show full text]
  • Marxism Vs. Quebec Nationalism
    1 Exchange with l’Égalité Marxism vs. Quebec Nationalism Reprinted below is an exchange between Marc D., a supporter able guidelines: of the International Bolshevik Tendency, and Damien Elliott, the ‘‘The Québécois constitute a nation sharing a common leading figure in the JCR-Gauche Révolutionnaire, the French national language, French; a culture and a history which affiliate of the Committee for a Workers’ International. The first date from the former North American colony of France; two items were originally published in French in the March 1994 and a common territory more or less delimited by the issue of l’Égalité (No. 28). present borders of the province of Quebec....The back- ground of the oppression of the Quebec nation goes back to the British conquest of the French colony in 1760 and Mail: l’Égalité in favor of Quebec nationalism? the defeat of the revolutionary national uprising of 1837, ‘‘ (...) I noted the article on the Canadian elections and the which was an attempt at bourgeois democratic revolu- photo of the indépendantiste demonstration in the last issue tion, similar to that launched by the American colonists (No. 26----Editor’s note) of l’Égalité. Does this signify support more than 60 years earlier....The Quebec nation is de- for Quebec nationalism? (...) The weight of nationalist sen- prived of its democratic right to political self-determina- timent in the workers’ movement represents a burden, and tion. The Canadian constitution nowhere recognizes the not a catalyst or an ‘objective dynamic’ in the development right of the Québécois or of any other nationality to decide of revolutionary class consciousness.’’----M.D.
    [Show full text]