2. History of the Nagorno-Karabakh Conflict

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

2. History of the Nagorno-Karabakh Conflict Master Thesis International and European Public Law The Nagorno-Karabakh Conflict: autonomy or independence? Sara Alborzi ANR S258044 Supervisor: S. J. Rombouts LLM Second reader: S. F. van den Driest LLM Mphil Faculty of Law Tilburg University 19 December 2012 Table of Contents List of Abbreviations ................................................................................................................................ 4 Map of Ancient Armenia and Albania (50 AD) ........................................................................................ 5 Map of the Republic of Azerbaijan .......................................................................................................... 6 Map of the Republic of Armenia and Nagorno-Karabakh ....................................................................... 7 Nagorno-Karabakh Country Profile ......................................................................................................... 8 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 10 2. History of the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict ..................................................................................... 12 2.1 Armenia in ancient times ............................................................................................................ 12 2.2 The development of the Azeri-Armenian hostilities ................................................................... 13 2.3 Nagorno-Karabakh’s separation from Armenia .......................................................................... 15 2.4 Karabakh Armenian’s attempts to separate Nagorno-Karabakh from Azerbaijan ..................... 16 2.5 The Nagorno-Karabakh war ........................................................................................................ 18 3. The principle of self-determination............................................................................................... 20 3.1 Internal and external self-determination ................................................................................... 20 3.2 Remedial right to secession ........................................................................................................ 22 3.3 People vs. minority...................................................................................................................... 27 3.4 Holders of the right to self-determination .................................................................................. 30 3.5 The definition of collective individuality ..................................................................................... 32 3.6 The impact of uti possidetis on the status of Karabakh Armenians as ethnic minorities ........... 34 3.7 Concsluion ................................................................................................................................... 36 4. Internal self-determination ........................................................................................................... 38 4.1 The right to autonomy ................................................................................................................ 38 4.2 Autonomy for the ethnic minorities in Finland and Italy ............................................................ 39 4.2.1 The Ǻland Islands ................................................................................................................ 39 4.2.2 South Tyrol .......................................................................................................................... 42 4.3 Internal self-determination and ethnic minorities ..................................................................... 43 4.4 Karabakh Armenian’s entitlement to internal self-determination ............................................. 46 4.5 The difficulties of establishing an autonomous Nagorno-Karabakh ........................................... 49 4.6 Conclusion ................................................................................................................................... 54 2 5. External self-determination .......................................................................................................... 56 5.1 The ICJ Advisory Opinion on Kosovo’s unilateral declaration of independence......................... 56 5.2 Nagorno-Karabakh’s independence in connection to the ban on the use of force .................... 60 5.3 Nagorno-Karabakh’s independence in connection to uti possidetis .......................................... 67 5.4 Conclusion ................................................................................................................................... 69 6. Conclusion ..................................................................................................................................... 71 Bibliography ........................................................................................................................................... 75 Annex 1 .................................................................................................................................................. 84 Annex 2 .................................................................................................................................................. 86 3 List of Abbreviations ASIL American Society of International Law CERD Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination CoE Council of Europe CSCE Conference on Security and Co-operation in Europe Doc. Document DR Decisions and Reports ECHR European Convention on Human Rights ECRI European Commission against Racism and Intolerance ETS European Treaty Series FCNM Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities GA General Assembly GAOR General Assembly Official Records HR/CT Human Rights Committee ICC International Criminal Court ICCPR International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights ICJ International Court of Justice ILC International Law Commission ILM International Legal Materials LN League of Nations LNOJ League of Nations Official Journal MFA Ministry of Foreign Affairs Mtg. Meeting NKAO Nagorno-Karabakh Autonomous Oblast NKR Nagorno-Karabakh Republic No(s). Number(s) OSCE Organization on Security and Co-operation in Europe PACE Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe Para(s). Paragraph(s) Plen. Plenary Rep. Republic Res. Resolution SC Security Council SCOR Security Council Official Records Sess. Session SSR Soviet Socialist Republic Supp. Supplement UN United Nations UNESCO United Nations Educational Scientific and Cultural Organization UNTS United Nations Treaty Series USSR Union of Soviet Socialist Republics Vol. Volume 4 Map of Ancient Armenia and Albania (50 AD) 5 Map of the Republic of Azerbaijan 6 Map of the Republic of Armenia and Nagorno-Karabakh 7 Nagorno-Karabakh Country Profile1 Official name: The Nagorno-Karabakh2 Republic (or the Republic of Artsakh3) Capital: Stepanakert State Language: Armenian Religion: Around 95 per cent of the population are followers of the Armenian Apostolic Church. Form of Government: Presidential Republic Currency: Armenian Dram (AMD), put on circulation in 1993 Population: 141.4 thousand people/ as of January 1, 2010 / Ethnic Composition: Armenians (95%), Russians, Ukrainians, Greeks, Georgians, Kurds, Azerbaijanis. Territory: The territory of the Artsakh Republic is more than 12 thousand km2 out of which 1041 km2 are under control of Azerbaijan. /The territory of the Shahumian region together with the Getashen sub-region is 2527 km2, 698 km2 of which are under control of Azerbaijan/. Natural resources: marble, granite, andesite, tuff, basalt, limestone, diabase, concrete clays, pumice, clay, different kind of metals, especially zinc, copper stone, lead, lithographic stone, coal, pyrites, iron, and other metals, water resources. National Flag: 1 Official website of the President of the Artsakh Republic: <http://www.president.nkr.am/en/nkr/generalInformation/> [accessed 20 September 2012]; 2 The name Nagorno-Karabakh (also spelled Nagorny Karabakh or Nagorno Karabagh) is derived from Persian, Russian and Turkish words, and literally means “Mountainous black garden”. 3 Artsakh used to be the name of Nagorno-Karabakh and it is the name most often used by Armenians in Nagorno-Karabakh. 8 The flag of the Republic of Nagorno-Karabakh (Artsakh) was adopted on June 2nd 1991 by the Supreme Council of the Republic. It is derived from the flag of Armenia, which consists of three equal horizontal stripes of red, blue and orange: The red colour symbolizes the on-going struggle of the Armenian people for existence, Christianity, independence and freedom. The blue colour symbolizes the will of the Armenian people to live in peace. The orange colour symbolizes creative power and diligence of the Armenian people. The flag of the Republic of Nagorno-Karabakh (Artsakh) further has a westwards pointing step like arrow (white division), which signifies Nagorno-Karabakh's current separation from Armenia, and its hopes for union with the Motherland.4 4 Website of the Armenian Student Association: <http://www.calpoly.edu/~asaclub/karabakh.htm> [accessed 20 September 2012]. 9 1. Introduction Ever since the existence of mankind, humans have always lived in separate societies that have competed with one another in order to outshine the other. Rivalry between peoples has always easily escalated into war. Wars in turn have led to conquest and the subjugation of peoples.
Recommended publications
  • Middle East 1 Middle East
    Middle East 1 Middle East Middle East Map of the Middle east. (Green color) Countries 18–38 (varying definitions) Languages Middle East: Arabic, Aramaic, Azerbaijani, French, Greek, Hebrew, Kurdish, Persian, Somali, Turkish Greater Middle East: Arabic, Armenian, Azerbaijani, Balochi, Berber, Dari, French, Greek, Georgian, Hebrew, Kurdish, Pashto, Persian, Somali, Tigrinya, Turkish, Urdu Time Zones UTC +3:30 (Iran) to UTC +2:00 (Egypt) (traditional definition) Largest Cities In rank order: Istanbul, Cairo, Tehran, Baghdad, Riyadh, Jeddah, Ankara The Middle East[1] is a region that roughly encompasses Western Asia. The term is considered to be Eurocentric and used as a synonym for Near East, in opposition to Far East. The corresponding adjective is Middle-Eastern and the derived noun is Middle-Easterner. The largest ethnic group in the middle east are Arabs,[2] with Turks, Turkomans, Persians, Kurds, Azeris, Copts, Jews, Maronites, Assyro-Chaldeans, Circassians, Armenians, Druze and numerous other ethnic groups forming other significant populations. The history of the Middle East dates back to ancient times, and throughout its history, the Middle East has been a major center of world affairs. When discussing ancient history, however, the term Near East is more commonly used. The Middle East is also the historical origin of major religions such as Judaism, Christianity, and Islam as well as the less common Baha'i faith, Mandaeism, Druze faith and others. The Middle East generally has an arid and hot climate, with several major rivers providing for irrigation to support agriculture in limited areas, especially in Mesopotamia and the rest of the Fertile Crescent. Many countries located around the Persian Gulf have large quantities of crude oil, which has resulted in much wealth particularly for nations in the Arabian peninsula.
    [Show full text]
  • A. D. Sakharov Armenian Human Rights Foundation
    A. D. Sakharov Armenian Human Rights Foundation Monitoring Report On Working Conditions in First Instance Courts in Shirak, Gegharkunik, and Syunik Marzes (Regions) Studies were conducted and this Report was elaborated due to the generous financial and technical assistance of the OSCE Office in Yerevan and the Polish Helsinki Foundation for Human Rights Preface The mission of the A. D. Sakharov Armenian Human Rights Foundation is to support the establishment of a civil society in Armenia, to enhance legal awareness of the public, and to protect rights and freedoms of humans and citizens. The organization has three regional branches in Shirak (City of Gyumri), Gegharkunik (City of Gavar), and Syunik (City of Goris). In 2001, representatives of the three branches attended a series of “Monitoring and Human Rights” seminars held in Lusakert by the OSCE Office in Yerevan and the Polish Helsinki Foundation for Human Rights; as a practical follow-up to the seminars, and within the framework of the ongoing judicial reform, they have carried out a “Monitoring of Working Conditions in First Instance Courts” project in the Shirak, Gegharkunik, and Syunik regions of Armenia. The goal of the project was to explore the current conditions in which courts in the regions operate, because the working conditions and infrastructure of the third branch of government are crucial in terms of its stance, its improved role and authority, and guaranteeing the right of citizens to a fair and public trial within a reasonable time, as required under the existing laws. The concept of the judicial reform in the Republic of Armenia was formed under the Constitution adopted in 1995.
    [Show full text]
  • Coat of Arms of Armenia - Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia
    Coat of arms of Armenia - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coat_of_arms_of_Armenia Coat of arms of Armenia From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia The national coat of arms of Armenia consists of an eagle and a lion supporting a shield. The coat of arms combines new and old symbols. The eagle and lion are ancient Armenian symbols dating from the first Armenian kingdoms that existed prior to Christ. The current coat of arms was adopted on April 19, 1992 by the Armenian Supreme Council decision. On June 15, 2006, the law on the state coat of arms of Armenia was passed by the Armenian Parliament. Contents 1 Symbolism 1.1 Shield 1.2 Eagle and Lion 1.3 Five vital elements 2 History 2.1 Coat of arms of the Democratic Republic of Armenia 2.2 Transcaucasian SFSR 2.3 Soviet coat of arms 3 References 4 See also 5 External links Symbolism Shield The shield itself consists of many components. In the center is a depiction of Mount Ararat with Noah's Ark sitting atop it. According to tradition, the ark is said to have finally rested on the mountain after the great flood. Ararat is considered the national symbol of Armenia and thus is of principle importance to the coat of arms. Surrounding Mount Ararat are symbols of old Armenian dynasties. In the lower left portion of the shield, there are two eagles looking at each other, symbolizing the length of the Armenian territory during the reign of the Artaxiad Dynasty that ruled in the 1st century BC.
    [Show full text]
  • Featuring: Sonia’S Special Friend | Now Miss Keti Knows C ONTENTS on the Cover: Ikaz Came to Church with His Friend
    QUARTER 2 2011 E u r o - A s i A D i v i s i o n featuring: Sonia’S Special Friend | now Miss Keti KnowS www.AdventistMission.org C ONTENTS on the Cover: Ikaz came to church with his friend. He loves Sabbath School and Adventurers. russiA 4 sonia’s Prayers | April 2 6 oxana’s Choice | April 9 8 sonia’s special Friend | April 16 10 Adventures With Jesus | April 23 12 Kiril’s new Family | April 30 AzErbAijan and GEorGiA 14 ibrahim’s Question | May 7 16 now Miss Keti Knows | May 14 18 Wanted: Lessons to share | May 21 ArmeniA 20 best Friends for Jesus | May 28 22 suren the believer | June 4 24 The Little Missionary | June 11 26 Lyuba shares God’s Love | June 18 Resources ights res 28 Thirteenth sabbath Program | June 25 ® - All r erved. tists ven Ad 20904-660 ay , MD 1 31 Activities -d ring th Sp n er ion.org ve lv iss e Si istM S , nt 35 Leader’s resources f e ve o ik d e P A c . n ia w e b w r w e m 36 Map f - u n l o o 4 C C 2 l 8 d l a 5 r . O e 8 n 1 4 e 0 6 G . 5 0 2 1 0 1 1 8 0 2 © D EAR S ABBATH S CHOOL L EADER, This quarter features the Euro-Asia Offering Device Division, which includes the countries of The special children’s project will help Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Georgia, provide children’s Sabbath School lessons Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Republic of for children in Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Moldova, Russian Federation, Tajikistan, Georgia.
    [Show full text]
  • Armenian Culture from the Semiotic Perspective
    Culture Studies Armenian Folia Anglistika Armenian Culture from the Semiotic Perspective Armine Matevosyan, Manana Dalalyan Yerevan State University Abstract The present paper goes along the lines of Semiotics, a branch of linguistics. It studies the system of signs which takes the form of words, images, sounds, gestures and objects. Through the usage of signs we represent the linguocultural aspect of our knowledge, ethnic traditions and folklore. The interest we take in the paper is the study of signs and symbols in Armenian culture. Culture, including miniature paining, singing, dancing, architecture and cuisine, may involve any sphere of Armenian identity. Signs and symbols that constitute language and culture are constructed through verbal and non-verbal interactions and are arbitrary. The purpose of our analysis is to specify what why, whom questions in a specific context of situation, as well as in a large context of culture, such as social community, media and communication. Key words: semiotics, culture, communication through signs, cultural identity, science of signs, cuisine, visual signs. Introduction Semiotics is the study of signs and sign using behavior. It was defined by Swiss linguist Ferdinand de Saussure as the study of “the life of signs within society”. It is an academic field dedicated to the study of signs. A sign (for example, the word ship) may be recognized by the presence of its constituent parts, which in semiotic theories is based on the signifier (the container, or the sign's perceptible form: the letters s-h-i-p) and the signified (the meaning or content; the notion conveyed by the signifier: a vessel of considerable size for deepwater navigation).
    [Show full text]
  • Flag of Armenia 1 Flag of Armenia
    Flag of Armenia 1 Flag of Armenia Use National flag. Proportion 1:2 Adopted August 24, 1990 Design A horizontal tricolour of red, blue, and orange The national flag of Armenia, the Armenian Tricolour (known in Armenian as եռագույն, erraguyn), consists of three horizontal bands of equal width, red on the top, blue in the middle, and orange on the bottom. The Armenian Supreme Soviet adopted the current flag on August 24, 1990. On June 15, 2006, the Law on the National Flag of Armenia, governing its usage, was passed by the National Assembly of Armenia. Throughout history, there have been many variations of the Armenian flag. In ancient times, Armenian dynasties were represented by different symbolic animals displayed on their flags.[1] In the twentieth century, various Soviet flags represented the Armenian nation. Symbolism The meanings of the colors have been interpreted in many different ways. For example, red has stood for the blood shed by Armenian soldiers in war, blue for the Armenian sky, and orange represents the fertile lands of Armenia and the workers who work them.[2] The official definition of the colors, as stated in the Constitution of the Republic of Armenia, is: All Articles originate from VentiWiki (http://venti.local/trunk/) Flag of Armenia 2 All Articles originate from VentiWiki (http://venti.local/trunk/) Flag of Armenia 3 Design Since the Armenian government does not specify the exact shades of red, blue, and orange, two different versions of the flag are in common use. The more common version consists of brighter shades, whereas the colors of the less common version are more muted.
    [Show full text]
  • ARMENIAN Level 1
    SIMON & SCHUSTER’S PIMSLEUR ® ARMENIAN LEVEL 1 READING BOOKLET ARMENIAN 1 Travelers should always check with their nation's State Department for current advisories on local conditions before traveling abroad. Booklet Design: Maia Kennedy Eastern Armenian © and ‰ Recorded Program 1996 Simon & Schuster, Inc. Western Armenian © and ‰ Recorded Program 1997 Simon & Schuster, Inc. © Reading Booklet 2007 Simon & Schuster, Inc. Pimsleur® is an imprint of Simon & Schuster Audio, a division of Simon & Schuster, Inc. Mfg. in USA. All rights reserved. ii ARMENIAN 1 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS VOICES English-Speaking Instructor. Ray Brown Eastern Armenian Speakers Female Speaker . Anoush Pashaian Male Speaker . Artur Veranyan Western Armenian Speakers Female Speaker . Annie Chekijian Male Speaker . Berj Chekijian COURSE WRITERS Dr. Vatche Ghazarian ◆ Christopher J. Gainty EDITORS Dr. Ulrike S. Rettig ◆ Beverly D. Heinle EXECUTIVE PRODUCER Beverly D. Heinle DIRECTOR Christopher Best NOTES Dr. Vatche Ghazarian ◆ Barbara Ghazarian Simon & Schuster Studios, Concord, MA iii ARMENIAN 1 Table of Contents Introduction . 1 The Armenian Language . 2 Asking a Question . 5 Armenian Punctuation . 6 The Armenian Alphabet . 8 History . 12 Religion . 15 The Land and Climate . 16 Population . 18 Greetings and Forms of Address . 20 Socializing - The Armenian Character . 21 Dress Code . 22 Society . 23 Recreation . 24 Cuisine . 25 Armenian Holidays . 26 The sections on Religion and Cuisine were contributed by Barbara Ghazarian, author of Descendants of Noah: Christian Stories from the Armenian Heart and Simply Armenian: Naturally Healthy Ethnic Cooking Made Easy. iv ARMENIAN 1 Introduction Pimsleur’s Eastern Armenian and Western Armenian Compact Programs each contain ten lessons on five CDs. These ten 30-minute sessions provide an introduction to the language, and make it possible to gain sufficient spoken-language proficiency to be able to have basic, but essential communication with local speakers.
    [Show full text]
  • Western Armenian 1
    ® Armenian 1 Reading Booklet Armenian 1 Travelers should always check with their nation's State Department for current advisories on local conditions before traveling abroad. Booklet Design: Maia Kennedy Eastern Armenian © and ‰ Recorded Program 1996 Simon & Schuster, Inc. Western Armenian © and ‰ Recorded Program 1997 Simon & Schuster, Inc. © Reading Booklet 2007 Simon & Schuster, Inc. Pimsleur® is an imprint of Simon & Schuster Audio, a division of Simon & Schuster, Inc. Mfg. in USA. All rights reserved. ii Armenian 1 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS VOICES English-Speaking Instructor . Ray Brown Eastern Armenian Speakers Female Speaker . Anoush Pashaian Male Speaker . Artur Veranyan Western Armenian Speakers Female Speaker . Annie Chekijian Male Speaker . Berj Chekijian COURSE WRITERS Dr. Vatche Ghazarian ◆ Christopher J. Gainty EDITORS Dr. Ulrike S. Rettig ◆ Beverly D. Heinle EXECUTIVE PRODUCER Beverly D. Heinle DIRECTOR Christopher Best NOTES Dr. Vatche Ghazarian ◆ Barbara Ghazarian Simon & Schuster Studios, Concord, MA iii Armenian 1 Table of Contents Introduction. 1 The Armenian Language . 1 Asking a Question . 5 Armenian Punctuation. 6 Armenian Alphabet . 8 History . 12 Religion . 15 The Land and Climate . 16 Population . 18 Greetings and Forms of Address . 19 Socializing - The Armenian Character . 21 Dress Code . 23 Society. 23 Recreation . 24 Cuisine . 25 Armenian Holidays . 26 The sections on Religion and Cuisine were contributed by Barbara Ghazarian, author of Descendants of Noah: Christian Stories from the Armenian Heart and Simply Armenian: Naturally Healthy Ethnic Cooking Made Easy. iv Armenian 1 Introduction Pimsleur’s Eastern Armenian and Western Armenian Programs each contain ten lessons. These ten 30-minute sessions provide an introduction to the language, and make it possible to gain sufficient spoken-language proficiency to be able to have basic, but essential communication with local speakers.
    [Show full text]
  • Flag of Armenia - Ventiwiki
    Flag of Armenia - VentiWiki http://venti.local/trunk/index.php/Flag_of_Armenia Flag of Armenia From VentiWiki Flag of Armenia The national flag of Armenia, the Armenian Tricolour (known in Armenian as եռագույն, erraguyn), consists of three horizontal bands of equal width, red on the top, blue in the middle, and orange on the bottom. The Armenian Supreme Soviet adopted the current flag on August 24, 1990. On June 15, 2006, the Law on the National Flag of Armenia, governing its usage, was passed by the National Assembly of Armenia. Use National flag. Throughout history, there have been many variations of the Proportion 1:2 Armenian flag. In ancient times, Armenian dynasties were Adopted August 24, 1990 represented by different symbolic animals displayed on their Design A horizontal tricolour of red, blue, and orange flags.[1] In the twentieth century, various Soviet flags represented the Armenian nation. Contents 1 Symbolism 2 Design 3 History 3.1 19th century 3.2 Transcaucasian Democratic Federative Republic 3.3 Democratic Republic of Armenia 3.4 Early Soviet Armenia and the Transcaucasian SFSR 3.5 Armenian SSR 4 Usage 4.1 National flag days 5 Influence 6 See also 7 References 8 External links Symbolism The meanings of the colors have been interpreted in many different ways. For example, red has stood for the blood shed by Armenian soldiers in war, blue for the Armenian sky, and orange represents the fertile lands of Armenia and the workers who work them.[2] 1 of 7 3/26/08 2:14 PM Flag of Armenia - VentiWiki http://venti.local/trunk/index.php/Flag_of_Armenia The official definition of the colors, as stated in the Constitution of the Republic of Armenia, is: Red symbolizes the Armenian Highland, the Armenian people's continued struggle for “ survival, maintenance of the Christian faith, Armenia's independence and freedom.
    [Show full text]
  • ARMENIA LOCAL SINGLE SKY IMPLEMENTATION Level2020 1 - Implementation Overview
    LSSIP 2020 - ARMENIA LOCAL SINGLE SKY IMPLEMENTATION Level2020 1 - Implementation Overview Document Title LSSIP Year 2020 for Armenia Info Centre Reference 20/12/22/50 Date of Edition 19/03/2021 LSSIP Focal Point Samvel Baghdasaryan - [email protected] – ARMATS LSSIP Contact Person Octavian Cioară - [email protected] EUROCONTROL / NMD/INF/PAS LSSIP Support Team [email protected] Status Released Intended for EUROCONTROL Stakeholders Available in https://www.eurocontrol.int/service/local-single-sky-implementation- monitoring Reference Documents LSSIP Documents https://www.eurocontrol.int/service/local-single-sky-implementation- monitoring Master Plan Level 3 – Plan https://www.eurocontrol.int/publication/european-atm-master-plan- Edition 2020 implementation-plan-level-3 Master Plan Level 3 – Report https://www.eurocontrol.int/publication/european-atm-master-plan- Year 2020 implementation-report-level-3 European ATM Portal https://www.atmmasterplan.eu/ STATFOR Forecasts https://www.eurocontrol.int/statfor National AIP Request should be sent to e-mail: [email protected] FAB Performance Plan Request should be sent to e-mail: [email protected] LSSIP Year 2020 Armenia Released Issue APPROVAL SHEET The following authorities have approved all parts of the LSSIP Year 2020 document and the signatures confirm the correctness of the reported information and reflect the commitment to implement the actions laid down in the European ATM Master Plan Level 3 (Implementation View) – Edition 2020. LSSIP Year 2020 Armenia
    [Show full text]
  • Geography and Vexillology: Landscapes in the Flags
    Geography and vexillology: landscapes in flags By Tiago José Berg Abstract This paper aims to present how the national flags have on its symbo - lism a representation of landscape. In geography, both in academic levels as well as in school teaching, landscape takes on a central theme that has so far been the subject of scientific debate of great importance by geographers as a way of seeing the world and a form of representing a specific surface of the Earth. In vexillology, the symbolism of the modern nation-state has developed a number of examples where the arrangement of stripes (or even the coat of arms) of some national flags bring certain aspects that are not immediately apparent, but they may become beautiful examples of a stylized representation of the landscape. Therefore, in this paper we seek a dialogue between geography and vexillology, showing how the representation of landscape in the flags can become a relevant theme to be used in academic research and a fascinating resource to enrich the teaching in schools. Introduction The last decades of the twentieth century saw the revival of interest in studies of the landscape geographers, both the number of publications, the associations made with the theme. The landscape, rather than a return to “classical geography” or even the new perspectives presented by the cultural geography, back to being inserted in geographical studies with a different approach. Both in academic level as well as in school education, the landscape takes on a theme that has been the subject of scien - tific debate of great importance by geographers as a way of seeing the world and a way of representing the specific surface of the Earth.
    [Show full text]
  • The Armenian
    MAY 12, 2012 THE ARMENIAN Mirror -Spe ctaItn Ouor Mirror -Spe ctatror 80th Year Volume LXXXII, NO. 42, Issue 4238 $ 2.00 NEWS IN BRIEF The First English Language Armenian Weekly in the United States Since 1932 Group Asks Clinton to Armenian Election Given Mixed Assessment Include Israel in NATO Summit after Ruling Republican Party Turkey Veto Wins Big NEW YORK — The Anti-Defamation League (ADL) YEREVAN (RFE/RL) — International this week expressed deep concern at reports that observers gave a mixed assessment of Turkey blocked Israel’s participation in the upcom - Armenia’s parliamentary elections this ing NATO summit due to bilateral disagreements week, praising the pre-election environment between the two countries. in the country but reporting irregularities In a letter to Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, in a “significant number” of polling stations the league called Turkey’s actions “extremely on voting day. unfortunate” and “highly politicized,” and urged In their preliminary findings that fell short the State Department to find a way to enable of the Armenian government’s expectations, Israel’s participation in the summit, “…so that the nearly 300 observers mostly deployed by Turkey’s political dispute with Israel does not the Organization for Security and detract from the interests of the US, NATO, Israel Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) avoided stat - or the other participants in the Chicago summit,” ing whether the vote was democratic. which is scheduled for May 20-21. Senior European election observers start a joint news conference in Yerevan on May 7. “Armenia deserves recognition for its President Serge Sargisian is scheduled to partic - electoral reforms and its open and peaceful ipate in the summit.
    [Show full text]