Climate Change Impact Assessment and Adaptation Under Uncertainty

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Climate Change Impact Assessment and Adaptation Under Uncertainty Climate change impact assessment and adaptation under uncertainty Arjan Wardekker 2011 1 Research presented in this thesis was carried out at the Department of Science, Technology and Society (STS), Copernicus Institute for Sustainable Development and Innovation, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands, and at the Information Services and Methodology Team (IMP), Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency (PBL), Bilthoven, The Netherlands. Copyright © 2011, Arjan Wardekker. All rights reserved. Cite as: Wardekker, J.A. (2011). Climate change impact assessment and adaptation under uncertainty. PhD dissertation. Utrecht University, Utrecht. (for the journal-published chapters (3-6), preferably cite the journal articles) Cover design: Filip de Blois (based on an idea by Arjan Wardekker). Globe image used: “The Blue Marble” (2002 east version) by NASA. Printed by: Proefschriftmaken.nl || Printyourthesis.com. ISBN: 978-90-8891-281-8. 2 Climate change impact assessment and adaptation under uncertainty Effectbeoordeling en aanpassing aan klimaatverandering onder onzekerheid (met een samenvatting in het Nederlands) Proefschrift ter verkrijging van de graad van doctor aan de Universiteit Utrecht op gezag van de rector magnificus, prof.dr. G.J. van der Zwaan, ingevolge het besluit van het college voor promoties in het openbaar te verdedigen op woensdag 15 juni 2011 des ochtends te 10.30 uur door Johannes Adrianus Wardekker geboren op 5 September 1981 te Amersfoort 3 Promotor: Prof.dr. W.C. Turkenburg Co-promotoren: Dr. J.P. van der Sluijs Prof.dr. A.C. Petersen Dit proefschrift werd mede mogelijk gemaakt met financiële steun van het Planbureau voor de Leefomgeving (PBL) en nationaal onderzoeksprogramma Klimaat voor Ruimte. The research presented in this thesis has been made possible through the financial support of the Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency (PBL) and national research programme Climate changes Spatial Planning. 4 Contents Chapter 1. Introduction ________________________________________________ 9 1.1. Climate change, impacts, and adaptation _______________________ 10 1.2. Uncertainty ________________________________________________ 13 1.3. Climate change adaptation under uncertainty ___________________ 16 1.4. Focus and scope of this thesis _________________________________ 19 Chapter 2. Uncertainty and health risks of climate change: Results of an expert elicitation for the Netherlands __________________________________________ 23 2.1. Introduction _______________________________________________ 24 2.2. Methods __________________________________________________ 25 2.2.1. Setup _________________________________________________________ 25 2.2.2. Expert selection ________________________________________________ 26 2.2.3. Protocol and analysis ____________________________________________ 26 2.3. Results ____________________________________________________ 27 2.3.1. Temperature ___________________________________________________ 27 2.3.2. Allergies ______________________________________________________ 30 2.3.3. Pests _________________________________________________________ 30 2.3.4. Vector-borne diseases____________________________________________ 31 2.3.5. Food- and waterborne diseases _____________________________________ 31 2.3.6. Air quality ____________________________________________________ 32 2.3.7. Flooding and storms _____________________________________________ 32 2.3.8. UV __________________________________________________________ 33 2.3.9. Relevance of health effects for adaptation ____________________________ 33 2.4. Discussion _________________________________________________ 35 2.4.1. Reflection on findings ___________________________________________ 35 2.4.2. Relevance for other countries. _____________________________________ 36 2.4.3. Policy implications ______________________________________________ 37 2.5. Conclusions________________________________________________ 38 Acknowledgements _____________________________________________ 39 Supplementary Material for Chapter 2 ____________________________ 40 2.Sup.1. Steps in expert elicitation _______________________________________ 40 2.Sup.2. List of participants ____________________________________________ 40 2.Sup.3. Questionnaire ________________________________________________ 41 2.Sup.4. Relevance of health effects for adaptation policy ____________________ 48 2.Sup.5. Uncertainty and options for adaptation ____________________________ 52 5 Chapter 3. Operationalising a resilience approach to adapting an urban delta to uncertain climate changes _____________________________________________ 55 3.1. Introduction _______________________________________________ 56 3.2. Research design ____________________________________________ 58 3.3. Description of the area ______________________________________ 60 3.4. Climate change related problems for the area ___________________ 61 3.4.1. Temperature ___________________________________________________ 61 3.4.2. Sea level rise___________________________________________________ 61 3.4.3. Wind and windstorms ____________________________________________ 62 3.4.4. River discharge _________________________________________________ 63 3.4.5. Precipitation extremes ___________________________________________ 63 3.4.6. Societal and governmental issues ___________________________________ 63 3.4.7. Wildcards _____________________________________________________ 64 3.5. Options for resilience ________________________________________ 65 3.5.1. Homeostasis ___________________________________________________ 65 3.5.2. Omnivory _____________________________________________________ 66 3.5.3. High flux _____________________________________________________ 66 3.5.4. Flatness _______________________________________________________ 67 3.5.5. Buffering _____________________________________________________ 67 3.5.6. Redundancy ___________________________________________________ 68 3.5.7. Other options __________________________________________________ 68 3.6. Discussion _________________________________________________ 69 3.6.1. Reflection on the resilience principles and comparison with the Vancouver study ______________________________________________________________ 69 3.6.2. Reflection on the approach and results _______________________________ 70 3.6.3. Resilience and climate change adaptation under uncertainty ______________ 72 3.6.4. Resilience versus other adaptation approaches_________________________ 73 3.7. Conclusions________________________________________________ 74 Acknowledgements _____________________________________________ 75 Chapter 4. Ethics and public perception of climate change: Exploring the Christian voices in the US public debate __________________________________________ 77 4.1. Introduction _______________________________________________ 78 4.2. Methodology _______________________________________________ 81 4.2.1. Approach _____________________________________________________ 81 4.2.2 Data collection __________________________________________________ 83 4.2.3 Sample ________________________________________________________ 83 4.3. Christian religious discourses in the climate debate_______________ 84 4.3.1. Conservational stewardship _______________________________________ 85 4.3.2. Developmental stewardship _______________________________________ 87 4.3.3. Developmental preservation _______________________________________ 89 6 4.4. Discussion _________________________________________________ 91 4.4.1. Comparing the discourses ________________________________________ 91 4.4.2. Timeline and priority ____________________________________________ 93 4.4.3. Discourse on uncertainty _________________________________________ 93 4.4.4. Religious versus secular voices ____________________________________ 94 4.4.5. Impact on societal debate and political decision making _________________ 95 4.5. Conclusion ________________________________________________ 96 Acknowledgements _____________________________________________ 97 Supplementary Material for Chapter 4 ____________________________ 98 4.Sup.1. Organizations included _________________________________________ 98 4.Sup.2. People included ______________________________________________ 99 Chapter 5. Uncertainty communication in environmental assessments: Views from the Dutch science-policy interface ______________________________________ 101 5.1. Introduction ______________________________________________ 102 5.2. Methodology ______________________________________________ 105 5.3. Perception of uncertainty and uncertainty communication _______ 107 5.4. Demand for uncertainty information __________________________ 110 5.4.1 Interest in uncertainty information: general and specific topics ___________ 110 5.4.2 Sources and types of uncertainty ___________________________________ 112 5.4.3 Implications of uncertainty _______________________________________ 112 5.4.4 Recalculations _________________________________________________ 113 5.5. Presentation of uncertainty information _______________________ 113 5.5.1 Probability terms _______________________________________________ 113 5.5.2 Presenting different sources of uncertainty ___________________________ 115 5.5.3 Qualitative aspects of uncertainty __________________________________ 116 5.5.4 The place of uncertainty information in reports _______________________ 119 5.6. Discussion ________________________________________________ 120 5.6.1 Limitations of the analysis _______________________________________
Recommended publications
  • Maeslant Barrier
    Technical report Maeslant barrier Alternative solution for the upgrading of the Maeslant barrier Jonas Riteco (4167759) 16. January 2017 Prof. Dr. Ir. Jonkman, S.N. Research project Ir. Molenaar, W.F. Fallsemester 2016 Cover Closed Maeslant Barrier, Bird’s eye view Source: Beeldbank Rijkswaterstaat https://beeldbank.rws.nl/MediaObject/Details/Luchtfoto_van_de_gesloten_Maeslantkering_ in_de_nieuwe_Waterweg_nabij_Hoek_van_Holland_158813 Date: 17.10.2016 TU Delft - Project work Alternative solution Maeslant barrier Preface I am an exchange student from the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology in Zürich (ETH). Part of the master program at the ETH is writing an additional thesis in each study direction you are following. This is therefore the report to my project for hydraulic engineering. The goal of this thesis is to demonstrate the ability to use all the knowledge gathered in the last years and to perform research at an academic level. The aim of this research is to investigate alternative solutions for the upgrading of the Maeslant barrier. Based on the experience about the Ramspol barrier an alternative design with an inflatable rubber barrier is worked out. I like to use the opportunity to thank my supervisor ir. Wilfred Molenaar for his support. Jonas Riteco, Delft, January 2017 TU Delft - Project work Alternative solution Maeslant barrier I Abstract The Maeslant barrier was the final piece of the Delta works which protects a large area of the Netherlands. However the present barrier seems to fulfil his function, several Dutch experts have doubts about the system. However the discussion on the Maeslant barrier not being safe enough refers mostly to future scenarios. Experts expect that the barrier already will not pro- vide enough protection from storm surges as of 2070.
    [Show full text]
  • Cryosphere, Instability, Sea Level Rise Session 1
    Miljø- og Planlægningsudvalget, Det Energipolitiske Udvalg MPU alm. del - Bilag 278,EPU alm. del - Bilag 140 Offentligt Session 1 Chairs Prof. Dorthe Dahl-Jensen & Dr. Konrad Steffen Cryosphere, Instability, Sea Level Rise The Ice and snow in the climate system is reacting to global warming and the changes of the ice and snow cover strongly feeds back into the climate system. The glaciers, ice caps and glaciers are retreating and as a consequence sea level is rising. The predicted global warming during the next 100 years will reach levels where several of the ice masses will cross the threshold for being stable and disappear. Permafrost is under strong retreat which causes major infrastructure problems and also releases greenhouse gasses into the atmosphere. Sea ice is changing and the sea ice in the northern polar ocean has retreated in the last few years and might totally disintegrate during the next decade. The decrease of the cryosphere will cause sea level to rise but good future predictions calls for more improved models starting with an understanding of the processes that leads to the increase of discharge of ice especially from the ice streams in the ice sheets. We invite you to submit abstracts to the IARU Climate Congress, session 1 on Cryosphere, Instability, Sea Level Rise that relates to the subjects described above. Prof. Dorthe Dahl-Jensen Dorthe Dahl-Jensen is Prof. in Ice Physics at the Niels Bohr Institute, University of Copenhagen. She heads the Centre of Excellence for Ice and Climate with the focus to use ice core data to improve our understanding of the past, the present and the future climate.
    [Show full text]
  • NO CALM BEFORE the STORM a Landward Coastal Defence Alternative in the Westland As Guide for New Spatial Developments
    NO CALM BEFORE THE STORM A landward coastal defence alternative in the Westland as guide for new spatial developments Judit Bax Graduation thesis Urbanism, Delft Uni- versity of Technology in cooperation with the Rijkswaterstaat National Institute for Coastal and Marine Management /RWS RIKZ. June 2005 No calm before the storm | Judit Bax 1 2 No calm before the storm | Judit Bax NO CALM BEFORE THE STORM A landward coastal defence alternative in the Westland as guide for new spatial developments Judit Bax Graduation thesis Urbanism, Delft University of Technology In cooperation with the Rijkswaterstaat National Institute for Coastal and Marine Management /RWS RIKZ June 2005 supervisors ir. Inge Bobbink Landscape architecture prof. ir. Joost Schrijnen City and region ir. Willem Hermans Urban design drs. Moniek Löffler RWS RIKZ external examiner ir. Hein de Haan Urban management and renewal for more information about the author visit http://home.deds.nl/~stormenzand [email protected] No calm before the storm | Judit Bax 3 4 No calm before the storm | Judit Bax Tussen wolken en aarde de tekens: Between clouds and earth the signs: dit waren wij, zijn wij. Kijk maar, this is who we were, who we are. Just look, wij graven land uit het water, we dig land from the water, stapelen stenen tot torens, stack stones to towers, onze blik laat geen ruimte met rust. our view leaves no space alone. Aan de rafelige rand van ons blikveld At the frayed edge of our horizon, raakt het oog nog vluchtig verleden: the eye catches the past still briefly: het scheve hek, de vergeten the leaning fence, the forgotten wan in de graanschuur, het muntgeld winnow in the granary, the coins met het scheepswrak mee opgegraven, dug up with the wrecked ship, de gebroken boog van de brug.
    [Show full text]
  • Advies Deltaprogramma Rijnmond-Drechtsteden Stuurgroep Rijnmond-Drechtsteden Colofon
    Deltaprogramma | Rijnmond-Drechtsteden Advies Deltaprogramma Rijnmond-Drechtsteden Stuurgroep Rijnmond-Drechtsteden Colofon Dit is een uitgave van Deltaprogramma | Rijnmond-Drechtsteden Uitgevoerd door Programmateam Rijnmond-Drechtsteden: Ministerie van Economische Zaken Ministerie van Infrastructuur en Milieu Provincie Zuid-Holland Hoogheemraadschap van Schieland en de Krimpenerwaard Havenbedrijf Rotterdam Gemeente Dordrecht Gemeente Rotterdam Omslag: De Urbanisten, D.EFAC.TO. Afbeeldingen: Alle afbeeldingen zijn van De Urbanisten en D.EFAC.TO. behalve: - naast Inhoud: Theo Bos - Deltabeslissing Rijn-Maasdelta (p.3): Delta-Atelier - Sterke urbane dijken (p.8), Toekomstbestendige Rivierdijken (p.10): Marijn Kik - Hoogwater buitendijks in Rotterdam op 6 december 2013 (p.14) - Dijkversterking aan de Lek (p.16): Theo Bos - Adaptatiepad voorkeursstrategie waterveiligheid Rijnmond-Drechtsteden (p.17): Delta-Atelier - Inlaatpunt Gouda (p.22-23): Desiree Bokma - Glazen Bollen (p.24): Suzan Fotografie - Architectuur Biënnale, Making Cities, 2012 (p.27): Marijn Kik - Dag van de kansrijke Strategie (p.28): Sylvia de Hoog Opmaak: Fred Sophie (nxix) Kijk voor meer informatie op: www.deltacommissaris.nl Juni 2014 VI Deltaprogramma | Rijnmond-Drechtsteden Deltaprogramma | Rijnmond-Drechtsteden Advies Deltaprogramma Rijnmond-Drechtsteden Stuurgroep Rijnmond-Drechtsteden Advies Deltaprogramma Rijnmond-Drechtsteden I Voorwoord Voor u ligt het advies van het Delta- Rijnmond-Drechtsteden. De Stuurgroep programma Rijnmond-Drechtsteden. Rijnmond-Drechtsteden heeft in de daaropvolgende jaren verder onderzoek In opdracht van de toenmalige staatsecre- gedaan naar de specifi eke opgave en taris van het ministerie van Verkeer en mogelijke oplossingen. Daarbij is intensief Waterstaat en van de minister van samengewerkt met Rijk, regionale over- Volkshuisvesting, Ruimtelijke Ordening heden, kennisinstellingen, belangen- en Milieu startt en wij als Stuurgroep organisaties, ondernemers, ontwerpers, Rijnmond-Drechtsteden in 2009 met onze een wetenschappelijke refl ectiegroep werkzaamheden.
    [Show full text]
  • The Economics of Flood Prevention, a Dutch Perspective1
    CPB Background Document / CPB Achtergronddocument Keynote address by Free Huizinga of a symposium in Houston on flood management. The symposium was organized by the governor of Texas, Texas A&M University, The Royal Netherlands Embassy and 'Bouwend Nederland'. Keynote lezing door Free Huizinga op een symposium in Houston over water veiligheid georganiseerd door de gouverneur van Texas, Texas A&M University, de Nederlandse ambassade en Bouwend Nederland. The economics of flood prevention, A Dutch perspective1 Frederik Huizinga June 2012 1 This lecture was the keynote address at events hosted by the Flood Executive Committee in Norfolk, Virginia, on June 25, 2012, and by The Bay Area Houston Economic Partnership in Houston, Texas, on June 28, 2012. For correspondence write to: Frederik Huizinga, CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis, P.O. box 80510, The Hague, The Netherlands. Tel +31 70 3383 380. Web address www.cpb.nl 1 1 Overview Ladies and gentlemen, thank you very much for this invitation to talk to you about one of my favorite subjects, namely water. I feel very honored to speak to such a distinguished audience in this wonderful place right on the waterfront. In my talk I will tell you mostly about the Dutch experience. In the discussion afterwards we may compare notes and see how we both may benefit from each other’s experiences. The figure below illustrates the Dutch issue in a nutshell. Figure 1.1 Geography of The Netherlands The blue part of The Netherlands on the left is in danger of flooding, containing 55% of the country. 26% of the country lies below sea level.
    [Show full text]
  • Achterlandstudie Maeslantkering
    Achterlandstudie Maeslantkering Hoofdrapport RWS-ZH/AP/2006/04 40814081 Maeslant_Rapport.inddMaeslant_Rapportapport.ind.indd2d 2 10-10-2006-10-2006 10:20:10:20:0707 Achterlandstudie Maeslantkering Hoofdrapport 15 oktober 2006 ir. W. Bijl rapport RWS-ZH/AP/2006/04 ISBN 90-369-4823-1 40814081 Maeslant_Rapport.inddMaeslant_Rapport.indndd 1 10-10-2006 12:10:33:10:33 40814081 Maeslant_Rapport.inddMaeslant_Rapport.indapport.indd2d 2 10-10-2006 12:10:312:10:33 Inhoudsopgave . 1 Inleiding 5 1.1 Wettelijke verplichting 5 1.2 Achterlandstudie 5 1.3 Scenario’s 6 1.4 Betrokken partijen 7 1.5 Leeswijzer 8 2. Effect op hydraulische randvoorwaarden 9 3. Effect op waterkeringen 13 3.1 Inleiding 13 3.2 Afbakening en methodiek 14 3.2.1 Algemeen 14 3.2.2 Toetssporen 14 3.2.3 Studiegebied 18 3.3 Resultaten 20 3.3.1 Aannames en uitgangspunten 20 3.3.2 Beoordeling dijkvakken 21 3.3.3 Beoordeling kunstwerken 24 4. Effect op buitendijkse gebieden 27 5. Eindoordeel toetsing 29 Referenties 35 3 Achlddhterlandstudie Maes lant kering: Hoo fdrapport 40814081 Maeslant_Rapport.inddMaeslant_Rapport.inddndd 3 10-10-2006 12:10:312:10:33 4 Achterlandstudie Maeslantkering: Hoofdrapport 40814081 Maeslant_Rapport.inddMaeslant_Rapport.indapport.indd4d 4 10-10-2006 12:10:3:33 1. Inleiding . 1.1 Wettelijke verplichting Uit de huidige, tweede toetsronde van de primaire waterkeringen in het kader van de Wet op de Waterkering is gebleken dat de Maeslant- en Hartelkering – de beweegbare onderdelen van de Europoortkering – beide niet voldoen aan hun technische betrouwbaarheidseis [Arcadis, 2006a, 2006b]. Met name de eis met betrekking tot de kans op niet-sluiten wordt niet gehaald 12.
    [Show full text]
  • Budgeting Water Resources Integrated Water Management from the Treasurer’S Perspective
    Budgeting water resources Integrated water management from the treasurer’s perspective 2 Master Thesis: Jesse van Leeuwen Graduation committee: Prof. dr. ir. N.C. van de Giesen Dr. ir. P.J. van Overloop Dr. R.R. Negenborn Dr. ir. J.S. Timmermans Delft University of Technology February 2011 3 4 Preface The following thesis is the final component of a long academic journey. This journey started in Wageningen and is about to end in Delft. In and outside my studies, I have met many interesting people. Some of who have become very dear to me. A lot of interesting lessons were learned along the way. It has taught me much about what I like and perhaps even more about what I do not like. In this section I want to take the opportunity to thank: - God: for coming so that I may have life, and have it to the full (John 10:10). - Peter-Jules: for providing an interesting thesis topic, for guiding me in the process of conducting proper research and for giving me the freedom to focus on what I found interesting. - Suzanne: for listening, giving her thoughts and for sharing her beauty with me. - Mirjam en Tamar: for barging into our lives and being Mirjam and Tamar. - My family and friends: for their support and interest. 5 6 Summary In this thesis, the concept of water budgeting is discussed. This concept is based on a comparison between water resources and financial resources. It aims to approach water resources management problems more like a treasurer would. Water resources can be distributed in such a way as to optimise the chance of achieving a desired goal.
    [Show full text]
  • Leggerdocument Dijkringverbindende Waterkeringen Zuid-Holland
    LEGGERDOCUMENT DIJKRINGVERBINDENDE WATERKERING STORMVLOEDKERINGNIEUWE WATERWEG/EUROPOORT Inhoud 1 Inleiding __________________________________________________________________ 3 1.1 Aanleiding ______________________________________________________________ 3 1.2 Leeswijzer ______________________________________________________________ 3 2 Werkwijze __________________________________________________________________ 4 2.1 Kern- en (buiten)beschermingszone ________________________________________ 4 2.2 Leggerdwarsprofielen ____________________________________________________ 5 2.3 Leggerlengteprofielen ____________________________________________________ 6 3 Kering 8, Stormvloedkering Nieuwe Waterweg / Europoort _____________________________ 7 3.1 Beschrijving kering_______________________________________________________ 7 3.2 Aanwezige constructieve elementen ________________________________________ 8 3.3 Kern- en (Buiten)Beschermingszone ________________________________________ 8 3.4 Leggerdwars- en lengteprofielen __________________________________________ 10 4 Literatuur ___________________________________________________________________ 10 Kenmerk 073916515:B 2 LEGGERDOCUMENT DIJKRINGVERBINDENDE WATERKERING STORMVLOEDKERINGNIEUWE WATERWEG/EUROPOORT HOOFDSTUK 1 Inleiding 1.1 AANLEIDING Binnen het beheersgebied van Rijkswaterstaat dienst Zuid-Holland worden verschillende dijkringverbindende waterkeringen (DVK) onderscheiden. Het betreffen de volgende primaire waterkeringen van de categorie B: Kering 8: Stormvloedkering Nieuwe Waterweg
    [Show full text]
  • The Potentials of Renewable Energy1
    The Potentials of Renewable Energy1 Thematic Background Paper January 2004 Authors: Thomas B Johansson International Institute for Industrial Environmental Economics, Lund University, Lund, Sweden Kes McCormick International Institute for Industrial Environmental Economics, Lund University, Lund, Sweden Lena Neij International Institute for Industrial Environmental Economics, Lund University, Lund, Sweden Wim Turkenburg Copernicus Institute for Sustainable Development and Innovation, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands 1 This Thematic Background Paper (TBP) draws heavily from other texts that the authors have authored or co- authored, such as the World Energy Assessment: Update of the Overview (2003), the World Energy Assessment: Energy and the Challenge of Sustainability (2000), and Energy for Sustainable Development: A Policy Agenda (2002). Disclaimer This is one of 12 Thematic Background Papers (TBP) that have been prepared as thematic background for the International Conference for Renewable Energies, Bonn 2004 (renewables 2004). A list of all papers can be found at the end of this document. Internationally recognised experts have prepared all TBPs. Many people have commented on earlier versions of this document. However, the responsibility for the content remains with the authors. Each TBP focuses on a different aspect of renewable energy and presents policy implications and recommendations. The purpose of the TBP is twofold, first to provide a substantive basis for discussions on the Conference Issue Paper (CIP) and, second, to provide some empirical facts and background information for the interested public. In building on the existing wealth of political debate and academic discourse, they point to different options and open questions on how to solve the most important problems in the field of renewable energies.
    [Show full text]
  • “The Netherlands Water Country” “Tipping Points” in Water Policy and Management
    The Climate Proofness of “the Netherlands Water Country” “Tipping points” in water policy and management Jaap Kwadijk, Marjolijn Haasnoot, Marco Hoogvliet, Ad Jeuken, Rob van de Krogt, Niels van Oostrom, Harry Schelfhout, Emiel van Velzen, Marcel de Wit (Deltares). Harold van Waveren, Theo Vulink, Neeltje Kielen (Rijkswaterstaat). Cause for concern Studies into the effects of climate change usually take climate scenarios as their starting point. In this Deltares/Rijkswaterstaat study we started at the opposite end of the effect chain and examined whether, and for how long, current water management will continue to be effective. This has shown, for instance, that climate change and the rise in sea level are more likely to cause a threat to the freshwater provision in the West of the Netherlands than to cause a threat from flooding. Also, environmental management that aims at maintaining certain species is not feasible in a changing climate. These are a few of the results thrown up by the research by Deltares into the consequences of climate change for Dutch water management. The results have been used by the Delta Commission, which in the Netherlands launched an advise to the national government about how to cope rising sealevel and climate change for the next 100 years. Introduction Adaptation of the water system to a changing climate is the primary focus of low-lying Deltas like the Netherlands. Even with the most far-reaching restriction on the worldwide production of greenhouse gasses, the climate will change in the course of the coming century and the sea level will continue to rise.
    [Show full text]
  • Pilot Flood Protection Hollandsche Ijssel
    Pilot Flood Protection Hollandsche IJssel A Practice Brief from the Interreg North Sea Region FAIR project June 2020 Courtesy RWS, mediatheek. Preface The FAIR project The FAIR results FAIR brings together flood protection asset The demonstration and subsequent widespread owners, operating authorities and researchers implementation of the improved approaches and from across the North Sea Region (NSR) to share techniques will reduce the probability of flooding the policy, practice and emerging science of asset and minimise the impact of floods across the management. Despite the diverse character of North Sea Region. This will improve the climate the NSR, asset managers face common challenges resilience at target sites covering most of the NSR. across the region. ‘Target sites’ are those areas being protected by entire flood protection systems (e.g. Danish coast, The FAIR project aims to develop and implement Swedish Coast, Flemish Coast, Dutch Delta) and improved approaches for asset management of individual assets (e.g. Hollandse IJssel storm barrier, flood protection infrastructure. It will optimise Hamburg flood gates, etc). investment planning by exploring mainstreaming of these investments with other policy domains, The result indicators for the FAIR project are: and by mapping planned investments across a wide portfolio of flood protection assets. FAIR will 1. Reduce the life cycle costs of flood also identify cost-optimal adaptive infrastructure protection infrastructure through better upgrades by exploring a variety of technical targeting of investment; designs, with adaptability and life cycle costing for various performance levels. 2. Encourage the multi functionality of flood protection infrastructure through mainstreaming (that is, connecting) investments with other policy objectives; This Practice Brief 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Working Together with Water
    Working together with water A living land builds for its future Findings of the Deltacommissie 2008 Aan de watergang geboren, aan de grote stroom getogen, met verholen het vermogen om zijn tijdingen te horen, om de maningen van zijn gronden na te stamelen bij monde, blijf ik het verbond bewaren. Bij de wereld in gebreke blijf ik naar het water aarden; mag ik met het water spreken, ademen zijn ademhalen, zijn voorzeggingen vertalen. By the water born, by the current reared, a hidden power to hear, its tidings, its demands, And repeat them, stammering, I keep the bond. In this failing world my roots are in the water; I converse with the water, breathing its breaths, its promptings I translate. From: Het Sterreschip by Ida Gerhardt Verzamelde Gedichten II Athenaeum-Polak & van Gennep Amsterdam 1992 WORKING TOGETHER WITH WATER 1 Uit: Het Sterreschip door Ida Gerhardt Verzamelde Gedichten II Athenaeum-Polak & van Gennep Amsterdam 1992 De ondertitel van het advies is ontleend aan de spreuk op het monument op de Afsluitdijk 2 DELTACOMMISSIE 2008 Working together with water A living land builds for its future Findings of the Deltacommissie 2008 WORKING TOGETHER WITH WATER 3 Aan de watergang geboren, aan de grote stroom getogen, met verholen het vermogen, om zijn tijdingen te horen, om de maningen van zijn gronden Na te stamelen bij monde. Uit: Het Sterreschip door Ida Gerhardt Verzamelde Gedichten II Athenaeum-Polak & van Gennep Amsterdam 1992 De ondertitel van het advies is ontleend aan de spreuk op het monument op de Afsluitdijk 4 DELTACOMMISSIE 2008 Foreword One cannot conceive of the Netherlands without water.
    [Show full text]