DOCSLIB.ORG

SINGAPORE GOVERNMF~NT PRESS STATEMENT. INFS. AP. CHIEF MINISTER's PRESS CONFERENCE at AIRPORT the Agreement Reached in London B

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
SINGAPORE GOVERNMF~NT PRESS STATEMENT. INFS. AP. CHIEF MINISTER's PRESS CONFERENCE at AIRPORT the Agreement Reached in London B SINGAPORE GOVERNMF~NT PRESS STATEMENT. INFS. AP. 42/57. CHIEF MINISTER'S PRESS CONFERENCE AT AIRPORT The agreement reached in London between the All-Party Delegation and Her Ma jesty's Government covered all points asked for by Singapore, the Chief Minister, Mr. Lim Yew Hock, said at a Press conference at Singapore Airport this afternoon shortly after his arrival by air from Bangkok. On the question of the subversion clause inserted by the Secretar; of StRte for the Colonies, Mr. Lim said the delega- tion was not awo..ce .J f ::. t unti1. the very last meeting when the draft report ~as ~e ing considered. "When he brought up t h is matter," Mr . Lim explained, 11 ·we said that we did not like it because we felt it was a departure from normal dem ocr~tic practice. H~ (the Colonial Secretary) said that he must ha ve t t in order to ensure that the first Legislature i s a democra tic Lc gislatui"'e ." The Ch:i.e f Mi nj_s ter said the delegation "took note" of E.M. Govern:r-ent's intention. In answer to a question, Mr . Lim said those who were now arrested und~ r t~e Preservation of Public Security Ordinance would be treated as required under that Ordinance; the Ordinance was not being o.mended "for the moment. 0 Comin g back to the new clause which debars subversives from con testing t:1e f irst elections, the Chief Minister said this matter would be placed before the Legislative Assembly at its meeting on April 24. "I will give a full report and there will be a full-dress d-:'y~_";e on the Agreement with the British Government. 11 Mr. Lim exp lained that before the delegation left for London. there was an All- Party conference to plarl the str@tegy for the London talks . This .st rategy was enshrined in the White Paper placed before t he Legislative Assembly and the delegation received a mandate f!'0'"'1 t .h P L1 "'"' Pn;.°"!:' J ~,r. "This Merdeka Mission is not a Government Mis s ion - it is an All-Port y .Miss i on, t: he said. Asked about poss ible merger with the Federation, the Chief Minister r eplied, "That is always our aim. The sooner we merge the better for the Malayan nation." Asked vv:,·_ t his comments were on Mr. David Marshall's recent utterances in the Press, Mr. Lim said, "Mr. Marshall's comments are irrelevant." Mr. Lim said the delegation went with a mandate and they returned with that mandate fulfilled, except for two points. They were, firstly Singapore wanted to break away from the Colonial Office, but because of Britain's responsibility this could not be achieved. Secondly, the conditions of empl oyment of civilian employees of the armed Services. The delegation was told this was a matter for negotiation by the Services Departments. The conference agreed to setting up a tripartite committee on which members of the Sing2pore Government would sit to advise on con- ditions of emplcym en t. On the •.•••.••• 2/- I 2. On the Question of citizenship 9 Mr. Lim gave the assurance that everything would be done to speed up registration of citizens so that fresh elections c ould take place as soon as physically possible. He thought new elections would not be possible before January 1958 9 but they could be about the middle of next year if everything went well . "We will do all we can to speed it up, 11 he promised. "The sooner the new constitution gets going the better for all concern- ed." Ju::<:cJ agc:1111 aoo"'J. c the su-oversion clause, Mr . Lim said it was II imposed" on the delegation because they could not accept it. It was never in their mandate 9 adding, "but because you impose it we take note of it." Asked about the British Government's power to suspend the constitution the Chief Minister re-affirmed.that this was in the hands of the British Government but he thought they would have to exercise this power very cautiously. "We went and sought complete internal self- government. From the minute we become a part of a united Malaya we become independent," Mr . Lim added. lie said in conclusion that all members of the delegation were going to commence immediate consultations with their Parties on the London talks. Speaking for himself, he would begin consultations with the Labour Front on Tuesday of tbis week. Thousands lined the route along Geylang Road, Guillemard Road and Merdeka Bridge to watch the motorcade which wound its way from the Airport to City Hall. The motorcade, led by Mr . Lim Yew Hock in the first cart stopped at the Merdeka Bridge where delegation members were welcomed by the Singapore Trades Union Congress. N1r . Lim was presented with a painting and a scroll by trF! T. TLC. A.nd +,reY1 c raC'kers were fired as the procession got u~ der ~woy for ths City Hall. APRIL 14 1 1 957. (Time issued - 1810 hours) .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Singapore, July 2006
    Library of Congress – Federal Research Division Country Profile: Singapore, July 2006 COUNTRY PROFILE: SINGAPORE July 2006 COUNTRY Formal Name: Republic of Singapore (English-language name). Also, in other official languages: Republik Singapura (Malay), Xinjiapo Gongheguo― 新加坡共和国 (Chinese), and Cingkappãr Kudiyarasu (Tamil) சி க யரச. Short Form: Singapore. Click to Enlarge Image Term for Citizen(s): Singaporean(s). Capital: Singapore. Major Cities: Singapore is a city-state. The city of Singapore is located on the south-central coast of the island of Singapore, but urbanization has taken over most of the territory of the island. Date of Independence: August 31, 1963, from Britain; August 9, 1965, from the Federation of Malaysia. National Public Holidays: New Year’s Day (January 1); Lunar New Year (movable date in January or February); Hari Raya Haji (Feast of the Sacrifice, movable date in February); Good Friday (movable date in March or April); Labour Day (May 1); Vesak Day (June 2); National Day or Independence Day (August 9); Deepavali (movable date in November); Hari Raya Puasa (end of Ramadan, movable date according to the Islamic lunar calendar); and Christmas (December 25). Flag: Two equal horizontal bands of red (top) and white; a vertical white crescent (closed portion toward the hoist side), partially enclosing five white-point stars arranged in a circle, positioned near the hoist side of the red band. The red band symbolizes universal brotherhood and the equality of men; the white band, purity and virtue. The crescent moon represents Click to Enlarge Image a young nation on the rise, while the five stars stand for the ideals of democracy, peace, progress, justice, and equality.
    [Show full text]
  • Singapore's Chinese-Speaking and Their Perspectives on Merger
    Chinese Southern Diaspora Studies, Volume 5, 2011-12 南方華裔研究雜志, 第五卷, 2011-12 “Flesh and Bone Reunite as One Body”: Singapore’s Chinese- speaking and their Perspectives on Merger ©2012 Thum Ping Tjin* Abstract Singapore’s Chinese speakers played the determining role in Singapore’s merger with the Federation. Yet the historiography is silent on their perspectives, values, and assumptions. Using contemporary Chinese- language sources, this article argues that in approaching merger, the Chinese were chiefly concerned with livelihoods, education, and citizenship rights; saw themselves as deserving of an equal place in Malaya; conceived of a new, distinctive, multiethnic Malayan identity; and rejected communist ideology. Meanwhile, the leaders of UMNO were intent on preserving their electoral dominance and the special position of Malays in the Federation. Finally, the leaders of the PAP were desperate to retain power and needed the Federation to remove their political opponents. The interaction of these three factors explains the shape, structure, and timing of merger. This article also sheds light on the ambiguity inherent in the transfer of power and the difficulties of national identity formation in a multiethnic state. Keywords: Chinese-language politics in Singapore; History of Malaya; the merger of Singapore and the Federation of Malaya; Decolonisation Introduction Singapore’s merger with the Federation of Malaya is one of the most pivotal events in the country’s history. This process was determined by the ballot box – two general elections, two by-elections, and a referendum on merger in four years. The centrality of the vote to this process meant that Singapore’s Chinese-speaking1 residents, as the vast majority of the colony’s residents, played the determining role.
    [Show full text]
  • Folio No: DM.036 Folio Title: Correspondence (Official) With
    Folio No: DM.036 Folio Title: Correspondence (Official) with Chief Minister Content Description: Correspondence with Lim Yew Hock re: official matters, re-opening of Constitutional Talks and views of Australian interference in Merdeka process. Includes letter to GE Boggars on Chia Thye Poh and correspondence, as Chairman of Workers' Party, with Tunku Abdul Rahman re: merger of Singapore with Malaya. Also included is a typescript of discussion with Chou En-lai on Chinese citizenship and notes on Lee Kuan Yew's stand on several issues ITEM DOCUMENT DIGITIZATION ACCESS DOCUMENT CONTENT NO DATE STATUS STATUS Copy of notes on Lee Kuan Yew's views and statements on nationalisation, citizenship, elections, democracy, DM.036.001 Undated Digitized Open education and multi-lingualism [extracted from Legislative Assembly records] from 1955 - 1959 Letter to the Chief Minister re: Radio Malaya broadcast DM.036.002 13/6/1956 Digitized Open of [horse] race results Request to the Chief Minister to follow up on pensions DM.036.003 18/6/1956 Digitized Open under the civil liabilities scheme DM.036.004 20/6/1956 Reply from Lim Yew Hock re: action taken re: DM.36.3 Digitized Open Letter to the Chief Minister re: view of interference DM.036.005 20/6/1956 from Australian government in independence Digitized Open movement, offering solution DM.036.006 25/6/1956 From Chief Minister re: S Araneta's identity Digitized Open Letter to Chief Minister's Office enclosing from The Old DM.036.007 2/11/1956 Digitized Open Fire Engine Shop, USA Letter to Gerald de Cruz,
    [Show full text]
  • Xerox University Microfilms 300 North Zeeb Road Ann Arbor, Michigan 48106
    INFORMATION TO USERS This material was produced from a microfilm copy of the original document. While the most advanced technological means to photograph and reproduce this document have been used, the quality is heavily dependent upon the quality of the original submitted. The following explanation of techniques is provided to help you understand markings or patterns which may appear on this reproduction. 1. The sign or “target" for pages apparently lacking from the document photographed is “ Missing Page(s)“ . If it was possible to obtain the missing page(s) or section, they are spliced into the film along with adjacent pages. This may have necessitated cutting thru an image and duplicating adjacent pages to insure you complete continuity. 2. When an image on the film is obliterated with a large round black mark, it is an indication that the photographer suspected that the copy may have moved during exposure and thus cause a blurred image. You will find a good image of the page in the adjacent frame. 3. When a map, drawing or chart, etc., was part of the material being photographed the photographer followed a definite method in “sectioning" the material. It is customary tc begin photoing at the upper left hand corner of a large sheet and to continue photoing from left to right in equal sections with a small overlap. If necessary, sectioning is continued again — beginning below the first row and continuing on until complete. 4. The majority of users indicate that the textual content is of greatest value, however, a somewhat higher quality reproduction could be made from “ photographs" if essential to the understanding of the dissertation.
    [Show full text]
  • THE YEAR AHEAD No One Living in Malaya Can Complain That 1956 Was a Dull Uneventful Year. on 1St January, 1956 the Tungku Sailed
    1 THE YEAR AHEAD No one living in Malaya can complain that 1956 was a dull uneventful year. On 1st January, 1956 the Tungku sailed to London in quest for Merdeka. March, the Tungku returned to Malacca where he announced to a crowd of over 100,000 Malayans mostly Malays who had come from all parts of Malaya that the Federation would get Merdeka by 31st August, 1957. Ever since then, all political leaders in the Federation have been marking time, waiting for August, 1957, before they settle their differences of views and policy with the present leadership of UMNO and the Alliance. And this is true of political leaders both in and out of the Alliance. Compared to Singapore the Federation has had a quiet year. Over and above the usual "Emergency" news, the swift and firm flushout of the Chung Ling High School students was the only big local event, as against two riots in Singapore. On March 18th the Merdeka rally at Kallang Airport when the famous platform symbolically collapsed underneath David Marshall and sparked off the first. On October 24th, flush out of the Chinese High School and the Chung Cheng High School sparked off the second. But the failure of Singapore Merdeka talks in May did not spark off a riot, a tribute to the restraining influence of the leaders in Singapore. lky\1956\lky1200.doc 2 But it was the world-shaking events in Egypt and Hungary that will go down in history as the great events of last year. The brutal Anglo-French-Israeli invasion of Egypt shocked and angered the whole non-European world.
    [Show full text]
  • One Party Dominance Survival: the Case of Singapore and Taiwan
    One Party Dominance Survival: The Case of Singapore and Taiwan DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Lan Hu Graduate Program in Political Science The Ohio State University 2011 Dissertation Committee: Professor R. William Liddle Professor Jeremy Wallace Professor Marcus Kurtz Copyrighted by Lan Hu 2011 Abstract Can a one-party-dominant authoritarian regime survive in a modernized society? Why is it that some survive while others fail? Singapore and Taiwan provide comparable cases to partially explain this puzzle. Both countries share many similar cultural and developmental backgrounds. One-party dominance in Taiwan failed in the 1980s when Taiwan became modern. But in Singapore, the one-party regime survived the opposition’s challenges in the 1960s and has remained stable since then. There are few comparative studies of these two countries. Through empirical studies of the two cases, I conclude that regime structure, i.e., clientelistic versus professional structure, affects the chances of authoritarian survival after the society becomes modern. This conclusion is derived from a two-country comparative study. Further research is necessary to test if the same conclusion can be applied to other cases. This research contributes to the understanding of one-party-dominant regimes in modernizing societies. ii Dedication Dedicated to the Lord, Jesus Christ. “Counsel and sound judgment are mine; I have insight, I have power. By Me kings reign and rulers issue decrees that are just; by Me princes govern, and nobles—all who rule on earth.” Proverbs 8:14-16 iii Acknowledgments I thank my committee members Professor R.
    [Show full text]
  • Transcript of the Question and Answer Session at a Public Forum Organised by the University of Singapore Students' Union on Mo
    1 TRANSCRIPT OF THE QUESTION AND ANSWER SESSION AT A PUBLIC FORUM ORGANISED BY THE UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE STUDENTS’ UNION ON MONDAY THE 27TH AUGUST, 1962. QUESTION BY JOSEPH LYNUS: After careful scrutiny we have been convinced that the change from nationality to citizenship has just been a change in nomenclature. You, Mr. Lee, earlier maintained that there was no difference between the meaning of these terms. Since you now use the term “citizenship” as opposed to “nationality”, we see an inconsistency in your terms. Please explain yourself. Prime Minister: I am sorry that Mr. Lynus believes that I have been inconsistent. I have always maintained that the State Advocate-General of Singapore was absolutely right when he said there was in law no distinction between the concept of a common nationality or a common citizenship. However, apart from what the law was, we had to take into consideration the political propaganda on the ground. And I LKY/1962/LKY0827B.doc 2 say this, quite simply, my enemies took a dangerous line when they had insisted that citizenship was different from nationality and they wanted citizenship. Well, you remember Mr. Marshall, he is a man not unlearned in the law, he came before this very same gathering two months ago, and he said this: “We do not quarrel about proportional representation. “We do not quarrel about with their insistence that Singapore politicians should vote or stand for election in the Federation. So we say, ‘we accept it Tengku, but let us have a common citizenship and let us have a common constitutional disability that no Federation citizen can stand or vote in Singapore.
    [Show full text]
  • An Analysis of the Underlying Factors That Affected Malaysia-Singapore Relations During the Mahathir Era: Discords and Continuity
    An Analysis of the Underlying Factors That Affected Malaysia-Singapore Relations During the Mahathir Era: Discords and Continuity Rusdi Omar Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Discipline of Politics and International Studies School of History and Politics Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences The University of Adelaide May 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS TITLE PAGE TABLE OF CONTENTS i ABSTRACT v DECLARATION vi ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS vii ABBREVIATIONS/ACRONYMS ix GLOSSARY xii 1 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1. Introductory Background 1 1.2. Statement of the Problem 3 1.3. Research Aims and Objectives 5 1.4. Scope and Limitation 6 1.5. Literature Review 7 1.6. Theoretical/ Conceptual Framework 17 1.7. Research Methodology 25 1.8. Significance of Study 26 1.9. Thesis Organization 27 2 HISTORICAL BACKGROUND OF MALAYSIA-SINGAPORE RELATIONS 30 2.1. Introduction 30 2.2. The Historical Background of Malaysia 32 2.3. The Historical Background of Singapore 34 2.4. The Period of British Colonial Rule 38 i 2.4.1. Malayan Union 40 2.4.2. Federation of Malaya 43 2.4.3. Independence for Malaya 45 2.4.4. Autonomy for Singapore 48 2.5. Singapore’s Inclusion in the Malaysian Federation (1963-1965) 51 2.6. The Period after Singapore’s Separation from Malaysia 60 2.6.1. Tunku Abdul Rahman’s Era 63 2.6.2 Tun Abdul Razak’s Era 68 2.6.3. Tun Hussein Onn’s Era 76 2.7. Conclusion 81 3 CONTENTIOUS ISSUES IN MALAYSIA-SINGAPORE RELATIONS 83 3.1. Introduction to the Issues Affecting Relations Between Malaysia and Singapore 83 3.2.
    [Show full text]
  • DM.029 Folio Title: Labour Front Correspondence Content Description: Party Correspondence and Other Documents, List of Venues for the "Meet the People" Sessions
    Folio No: DM.029 Folio Title: Labour Front Correspondence Content Description: Party correspondence and other documents, list of venues for the "meet the People" sessions. Includes extract of a speech by the Chief Minister of Malaya on 20 Feb 1956 and invitation to the various party leaders to an All-Party Rally, arrangements at the airport to send David Marshall off, and anonymous letters. Correspondents include: Keng Ban Ee Er, Richard C.H. Lim, Lim Yew Hock, and S.H. Moffat ITEM DOCUMENT DIGITIZATION ACCESS DOCUMENT CONTENT NO DATE STATUS STATUS Memo from Keng Ban Ee enclosing List of venues for DM.29.001 2/2/1955 Digitized Open "Meet the People Sessions" Letter from Rabbi Harold H Gordon re: meeting up in DM.29.002 12/1/1956 Digitized Open New York Letter from Omar bin Salleh announcing appointment of DM.29.003 16/2/1956 S Devaraj, G Abishigenaden and Madam E Vaithinatha as Digitized Open Organisers of Cairnhill Division Letter from SH Moratt of the Labour Party of Israel, re: DM.29.004 1/2/1956 Digitized Open developments in Israel Letter from S Ramachandra, with views on immigrant and DM.29.005 6/2/1956 other issues, enclosing news clipping from Singapore Digitized Open Standard dated 2 Feb 1955 DM.29.006 9/2/1956 Anonymous letter chiding about "bad language" Digitized Open Letter from EH Koh offering service for the proposed DM.29.007 16/1/1956 Digitized Open Ministry of Labour and Industry DM.29.008 20/2/1956 Follow up letter to DM.29.7 Digitized Open Extract of speech by the Chief Minister of the Federation DM.29.009 21/2/1956
    [Show full text]
  • Class and Politics in Malaysian and Singaporean Nation Building
    CLASS AND POLITICS IN MALAYSIAN AND SINGAPOREAN NATION BUILDING Muhamad Nadzri Mohamed Noor, M.A. Political Science College of Business, Government and Law Flinders University Submitted in fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy August 2017 Page Left Deliberately Blank. Abstract This study endeavours to deliver an alternative account of the study of nation-building by examining the subject matter eclectically from diverse standpoints, predominantly that of class in Southeast Asia which is profoundly dominated by ‘cultural’ perspectives. Two states in the region, Malaysia and Singapore, have been selected to comprehend and appreciate the nature of nation-building in these territories. The nation-building processes in both of the countries have not only revolved around the national question pertaining to the dynamic relations between the states and the cultural contents of the racial or ethnic communities in Malaysia and Singapore; it is also surrounded, as this thesis contends, by the question of class - particularly the relations between the new capitalist states’ elites (the rulers) and their masses (the ruled). More distinctively this thesis perceives nation-building as a project by political elites for a variety of purposes, including elite entrenchment, class (re)production and regime perpetuation. The project has more to do with ‘class-(re)building’ and ‘subject- building’ rather than ‘nation-building’. Although this thesis does not eliminate the significance of culture in the nation-building process in both countries; it is explicated that cultures were and are heavily employed to suit the ruling class’s purpose. Hence, the cultural dimension shall be used eclectically with other perspectives.
    [Show full text]
  • Folio No: DM.044 Folio Title: Speeches Content Description: Texts of Speeches Mostly by David Marshall. Includes Lim Yew Hock'
    Folio No: DM.044 Folio Title: Speeches Content Description: Texts of speeches mostly by David Marshall. Includes Lim Yew Hock's speech prior to departure to London for the Constitutional Talks in 1957, Discourse on Socialism by Francis Thomas, speech by Chew Swee Kee on the Dissolution of the Singapore Middle Schools Students Union and the Budget Speech by Tom Hart on 7 Nov 1956. Also includes a list of questions posed to the Workers Party by Nanyang Siang Pau re: City Council elections. [Unidentifiable amendments to speeches are not indexed] ITEM DOCUMENT DIGITIZATION ACCESS DOCUMENT CONTENT NO DATE STATUS STATUS DM.044.001 Undated Note of praise on speech by Vernon Bartlett Digitized Open Speech to Foochow Coffee, Restaurant and Bar DM.044.002 14/11/1956 Digitized Open Employees Union DM.044.003 19/11/1956 Speech in the Legislative Assembly Digitized Open What I Believe [address to the] University Democratic DM.044.004 24/1/1957 Digitized Open Club Speech on "Citizenship and Merdeka" at Kong Hwa DM.044.005 10/3/1958 Digitized Open School Letter to William Tan, enclosing copy of speech to group DM.044.006 13/3/1957 of Chinese associations at Kong Hwa School on 10 Mar Digitized Open 1957 (DM.44.5) Letter to Yap Pheng Geck, enclosing copy of speech to DM.044.007 13/3/1957 group of Chinese associations at Kong Hwa School on 10 Digitized Open Mar 1957 (DM.44.5) Letter to Francis Thomas, enclosing copy of speech to DM.044.008 12/3/1957 group of Chinese associations at Kong Hwa School on 10 Digitized Open Mar 1957 (DM.44.5) Speech at a convention
    [Show full text]
  • Britain's Labour Party and the EEC Decision
    W&M ScholarWorks Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects 1990 Britain's Labour Party and the EEC Decision Marcia Marie Lewandowski College of William & Mary - Arts & Sciences Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wm.edu/etd Part of the Eastern European Studies Commons, International Relations Commons, and the Public Administration Commons Recommended Citation Lewandowski, Marcia Marie, "Britain's Labour Party and the EEC Decision" (1990). Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects. Paper 1539625615. https://dx.doi.org/doi:10.21220/s2-4w70-3c60 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects at W&M ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects by an authorized administrator of W&M ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. BRITAIN'S LABOUR PARTY AND THE EEC DECISION A Thesis Presented to The Faculty of the Department of Government The College of William and Mary in Virginia In Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts by Marcia Lewandowski 1990 APPROVAL SHEET This thesis is submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Marcia Marie Lewandowski Approved, May 1990 Alan J. Ward Donald J. B Clayton M. Clemens TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ................................................................................. .............. iv ABSTRACT .................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]