DOCSLIB.ORG

World Bank ‐ Third Party Monitoring Service Progress Report Contract

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
World Bank ‐ Third Party Monitoring Service Progress Report Contract World Bank ‐ Third Party Monitoring Service Progress Report Contract Number: 8006033 Dates Covered: 01 to 30 November 2018 Program Title: Third Party Monitoring Date 8 December 2018 Service Submitted: Report Type Monthly Progress Report Author: Philippa Morgan, Monitoring and Evaluation Officer 1. Administration IOM completed the induction of the new Field Monitors. The Field Monitors have already been given orientation on the TPM project and also completed all the required IOM and UN related security trainings to enable them to go to the field. The recruitment of the Program Officer is completed. She is expected to join the TPM team early January 2019. The recruitment of the Information Management Officer is pending interviews. 2. Key Achievements IOM conducted a Third Party Monitoring (TPM) verification mission to former Upper Nile State on 5 to 14 November 2018 to conduct physical verification of implementation progress of Health Facilities (HFs) currently supported under the World Bank’s Rapid Results Health Project (RRHP) portfolio. Eight HFs were visited in former Upper Nile State. See annex 1 for a breakdown of the HFs visited by location, type of HF and Implementing Partner (IP). The objective of the project is to improve the delivery of High Impact Primary Health Care (PHC) Services in former Upper Nile and Jonglei States. The findings are structured around the key areas for verification and quality assurance under the RRHP provided by the Bank and represent a consolidated summary of findings from the verification mission. A more substantive analysis of the findings will be presented to the Bank in comprehensive report due in February 2019. 3. Findings Service Delivery (i) Implementation of routine curative diseases Out of eight HFs assessed, only two of the HFs assessed (Assosa PHCC and Malakal Teaching Hospital PHCU) offer a full range of basic curative services including treatment of malaria, acute respiratory infections, diarrhea, tuberculosis and HIV. Lul PHCU in Fashoda County offers limited basic curative services – currently it provides malaria testing only‐ and no maternal health services. Based on findings from the verification tool, which included a checklist of available equipment in the HFs, all HFs lack basic medical equipment. Statistics relating to available equipment in the HFs will be provided in the full report. In many cases, infrastructure was compromised with large structural cracks in the buildings evidenced and bat infestations in the roof and wall structures. (ii) Implementation of outreach activities Outreach activities are currently being conducted at half of the HFs visited (4 out of 8). Those HFs that undertake outreach activities include Assosa PHCC, Bam PHCC and Malakal Teaching Hospital PHCU in Malakal County; and Akoka PHCU in Akoka County. Typical outreach activities include health education messaging on ANC, family planning and safe delivery and availability of services at the clinics. IOM did not see any evidence of extension services on offer in the community. (iii) Supporting of advocacy activities at community level There are currently no ongoing advocacy activities supported by any of the health facilities at the community level. (iv) Implementation of immunization activities as part of outreach programs All HFs, with the exception of Baliet PHCC and Anakadiar PHCU, Baliet County, are implementing immunization activities as part of outreach programs. Cold chain was evidenced through either vaccine carriers or the presence of a fridge in all six of the HFs, however, only two of the six HFs had antigens available (Akoka PHCU, Akoka County and Bam PHCC, Malakal County) and only one (Akoka PHCU) had vaccine order forms. (v) Presence of IPs on the ground Health Link currently has a limited presence on the ground and lacks transportation to ensure regular oversight takes place at the 13 Health Facilities under Health Link’s management. International Medical Corps (IMC) has a well established presence in Malakal and conducts regular visits to each of the three health facilities. Regular supervision of Kodok Town is taking place by CORDAID staff, however, support to rural HFs is limited to phone calls or the occasional visit to those HFs located close to the river. CORDAID put this down to lack of transportation, both land and water, and lack of human resources to physically travel to HFs in Fashoda which are often in hard to reach locations. (vi) Documentation of coordination activities between IPs and Project Implementation Unit (PIU) At the time of the assessment, no individual meetings had taken place between UNICEF and IPs, however, during the IOM mission, a Juba based UNICEF team had arrived in Malakal to conduct partner meetings and undertake further HF assessments. UNICEF held an Inception Workshop on 25 August 2018 for all partners in Malakal. IPs reported that they are required to report to UNICEF on a monthly and quarterly basis using a pre‐designed template. (vii) Review of Health Management Information System (HMIS) and data management at facility level Six health facilities included in the sample are producing HMIS reports. All health facilities are complying with the Ministry of Health’s Strengthened Integrated Disease Surveillance Response requirements by producing weekly Integrated Disease Surveillance Reports (IDSR). All of HFs but one (Assosa PHCC, Malakal County) are producing monthly reports. (viii) Documentation of information keeping and management Clinic information is documented through patient cards, registers, daily tally sheets, weekly IDSR and monthly reports. At the time of the verification visit, five of the health facilities did not have >5 patient cards, while two lacked <5 patient cards on site, however, all HFs have > 5 and < 5 patient registers, which were duly completed and appeared to be up to date. Pharmaceuticals (i) Availability of medicines at facilities IMC has received and distributed one shipment of drugs from UNICEF in October 2018 that included individual named cartons for each of the three health facilities assessed. Health Link received and distributed drugs for Akoka health facility in early November and mid‐November for health facilities in Baliet County. CORDAID received a shipment of drugs on the 7 November 2018, however at the time of the verification mission in Kodok Town on the 13 November 2018; only two of the 14 health facilities had received their drug quotas. IOM will provide statistics related to the availability of tracer drugs in the HFs in the full report. (ii) Record delivery of pharmaceuticals IPs verified that all drugs received from UNICEF were accompanied by a weigh bill, however, IOM was able to verify that only two of the health facilities (Kodok Town PHCC and Malakal Teaching Hospital PHCU) keep receipts for delivery of pharmaceuticals. (iii) Documentation of stock outs at facilities Only two health facilities (Kodok Town PHCC, Fashoda County and Baliet PHCC, Baliet County) kept records of expired drugs. Malakal Teaching Hospital PHCU, Malakal County; Asssosa PHCU, Malakal County; and Kodok Town PHCC, Fashoda County document stock outs while only the maternity department of Assosa is documenting stock outs. (iv) General documentation of medicine stocks While all health facilities conducted a monthly inventory recorded on stock cards, only three (Kodok Town PHCC, Lul PHCU and Malakal Teaching Hospital PHCU) were correctly filling in the stock cards. Stock cards were being distributed and completed during IOM’s verification mission to Lul PHCU, Fashoda County and IOM was unable to find any evidence that stock cards had previously been used in Lul PHCU. Citizen Engagement (i) Pharmaceutical supplies and health services reach intended beneficiaries IOM conducted focus group discussions with community members in Anakdiar, Baliet County and Akoka, Akoka County. Health facilities are easily accessible for community members who are generally satisfied with the services they receive. Focus group respondents were not actively engaged in health service provision in their community and did not attend meetings or individual consultations relating to health services. All respondents complained of the lack of availability of drugs between July and October 2018, which required them to walk to Malakal Town or utilize private pharmacies in order to fulfill prescriptions. In order to compliment the findings from the verification mission, IOM plans to conduct a Knowledge Attitude and Practice (KAP) survey in Upper Nile and Jonglei State. The KAP survey will help us better understand community health practices to inform more targeted recommendations. 4. Challenges Many of the HFs IOM visited ceased operations during the 2013 and 2016 eruptions of violence, resuming operations in 2017, as such, service delivery was either severely restricted or absent altogether during those periods. The assessment was not designed to assess Quality of Care (QoC), therefore, determining whether a HF was offering basic curative services was in line with the terms of reference, assessing how well those services were being implemented was not. 5. Planned Activities Next Month Field visit to the Wulu County in the former Lakes State and Gogriel in the former Warrap State for the verification of the institutional strengthening component of the LOGOSEED project at the respective county levels. The team will also finalize the data collection tools for the LOGOSEED project. IOM will develop a Terms of Reference for a consultant to undertake a KAP survey for the RRHP in former Upper Nile and Jonglei States to be shared with the Bank for approval and review. If approved, roll‐out is tentatively scheduled for February‐March 2019. 6. Annexes Annex 1 – List of Health Facility Demographics Annex 2 – RRHP data collection tools Annex 3 – LOGOSEED civil work specification checklist sample (classroom) Annex 4 – TPM in Pictures .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Dethoma, Melut County, Upper Nile State 31 January 2014
    IRNA Report: Dethoma, Melut, 31 January 2014 Initial Rapid Needs Assessment: Dethoma, Melut County, Upper Nile State 31 January 2014 This IRNA Report is a product of Inter-Agency Assessment mission conducted and information compiled based on the inputs provided by partners on the ground including; government authorities, affected communities/IDPs and agencies. 0 IRNA Report: Dethoma, Melut, 31 January 2014 Situation Overview: An ad-hoc IDP camp has been established by the Melut County Commissioner at Dethoma in order to accommodate Dinka IDPs who have fled from Baliet county. Reports of up to 45,000 based in Paloich were initially received by OCHA from RRC and UNMISS staff based in Melut but then subsequent information was received that they had moved to Dethoma. An IRNA mission from Malakal was conducted on 31 January 2014. Due to delays in the deployment by helicopter, the RRC Coordinator was unable to meet the team but we were able to speak to the Deputy Paramount Chief, Chief and a ROSS NGO at the site. The local NGO (Woman Empowerment for Cooperation and Development) had said they had conducted a preliminary registration that showed the presence of 3,075 households. The community leaders said that the camp contained approximately 26,000 individuals. The IRNA team could only visually estimate 5 – 6000 potentially displaced however some may have been absent at the river. The camp is situated on an open field provided and cleared by the Melut County Commissioner, with a river approximately 300metres to the south. There is no cover and as most IDPs had walked to this location, they had carried very minimal NFIs or food.
    [Show full text]
  • Project Proposal
    Project Proposal Organization GOAL (GOAL) Project Title Provision of treatment to children aged 6­59 months and pregnant and lactating women diagnosed with moderate acute malnutrition (MAM) or severe acute malnutrition (SAM) for children aged 6­59 month and pregnant and lactating women in Melut County, Upper Nile State Fund Code SSD­15/HSS10/SA2/N/INGO/526 Cluster Primary cluster Sub cluster NUTRITION None Project Allocation 2nd Round Standard Allocation Allocation Category Type Frontline services Project budget in US$ 150,000.01 Planned project duration 5 months Planned Start Date 01/08/2015 Planned End Date 31/12/2015 OPS Details OPS Code SSD­15/H/73049/R OPS Budget 0.00 OPS Project Ranking OPS Gender Marker Project Summary Under the proposed intervention, GOAL will provide curative responses to severe acute malnutrition (SAM) and moderate acute malnutrition (MAM) through the provision of outpatient therapeutic programmes (OTPs) and targeted supplementary feeding programmes (TSFPs) for children 6­59 months and pregnant and lactating women (PLW). The intervention will be targeted to Melut County, Upper Nile State – which has been heavily affected by the ongoing conflict. This includes continuing operations in Dethoma II IDP camp as well as expanding services to the displaced populations in Kor Adar (one facility) and Paloich (two facilities). GOAL also proposes to fill the nutrition service gap in Melut Protection of Civilians (PoC) camp. In the PoC, GOAL will be providing static services, with complementary primary health care and nutrition programming. In the same locations, GOAL will conduct mass outreach and mid upper arm circumference (MUAC) screening campaigns within communities, IDP camps, and the PoC with children aged 6­59 months and pregnant and lactating women (PLW) in order to increase facility referrals.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 AU Commission of Inquiry on South Sudan Addis Ababa, Ethiopia P. O
    AU Commission of Inquiry on South Sudan Addis Ababa, Ethiopia P. O. Box 3243 Telephone: +251 11 551 7700 / +251 11 518 25 58/ Ext 2558 Website: http://www.au.int/en/auciss Original: English FINAL REPORT OF THE AFRICAN UNION COMMISSION OF INQUIRY ON SOUTH SUDAN ADDIS ABABA 15 OCTOBER 2014 1 Table of Contents ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ............................................................................................... 3 ABBREVIATIONS ........................................................................................................... 5 CHAPTER I ..................................................................................................................... 7 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................. 8 CHAPTER II .................................................................................................................. 34 INSTITUTIONS IN SOUTH SUDAN .............................................................................. 34 CHAPTER III ............................................................................................................... 110 EXAMINATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS AND OTHER ABUSES DURING THE CONFLICT: ACCOUNTABILITY ......................................................................... 111 CHAPTER IV ............................................................................................................... 233 ISSUES ON HEALING AND RECONCILIATION .......................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Resident Coordinator Support Office, Upper Nile State Briefing Pack
    Resident Coordinator Support Office, Upper Nile State Briefing Pack Table of Contents Page No. Table of Contents 1 State Map 2 Overview 3 Security and Political History 3 Major Conflicts 4 State Government Structure 6 Recovery and Development 7 State Resident Coordinator’s Support Office 8 Organizations Operating in the State 9-11 1 Map of Upper Nile State 2 Overview The state of Upper Nile has an area of 77,773 km2 and an estimated population of 964,353 (2009 population census). With Malakal as its capital, the state has 13 counties with Akoka being the most recent. Upper Nile shares borders with Southern Kordofan and Unity in the west, Ethiopia and Blue Nile in the east, Jonglei in the south, and White Nile in the north. The state has four main tribes: Shilluk (mainly in Panyikang, Fashoda and Manyo Counties), Dinka (dominant in Baliet, Akoka, Melut and Renk Counties), Jikany Nuer (in Nasir and Ulang Counties), Gajaak Nuer (in Longochuk and Maiwut), Berta (in Maban County), Burun (in Maban and Longochok Counties), Dajo in Longochuk County and Mabani in Maban County. Security and Political History Since inception of the 2005 Comprehensive Peace Agreement (CPA), Upper Nile State has witnessed a challenging security and political environment, due to the fact that it was the only state in Southern Sudan that had a Governor from the National Congress Party (NCP). (The CPA called for at least one state in Southern Sudan to be given to the NCP.) There were basically three reasons why Upper Nile was selected amongst all the 10 states to accommodate the NCP’s slot in the CPA arrangements.
    [Show full text]
  • Upper Nile State SOUTH SUDAN
    COMMUNITY CONSULTATION REPORT Upper Nile State SOUTH SUDAN Bureau for Community Security South Sudan Peace and Small Arms Control and Reconciliation Commission United Nations Development Programme Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Netherlands The Bureau for Community Security and Small Arms Control under the Ministry of Interior is the Gov- ernment agency of South Sudan mandated to address the threats posed by the proliferation of small arms and community insecurity to peace and development. The South Sudan Peace and Reconciliation Commission is mandated to promote peaceful co-existence amongst the people of South Sudan and advises the Government on matters related to peace. The United Nations Development Programme in South Sudan, through the Community Security and Arms Control Project, supports the Bureau strengthen its capacity in the area of community security and arms control at the national, state and county levels. The consultation process was led by the Government of South Sudan, with support from the Govern- ment of the Netherlands’ Ministry of Foreign Affairs. Cover photo: A senior chief from Upper Nile. © UNDP/Sun-ra Lambert Baj COMMUNITY CONSULTATION REPORT Upper Nile State South Sudan Published by South Sudan Bureau for Community Security and Small Arms Control South Sudan Peace and Reconciliation Commission United Nations Development Programme MAY 2012 JUBA, SOUTH SUDAN CONTENTS Acronyms ........................................................................................................................... i Foreword ..........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Conflict in Upper Nile State (18 March 2014 Update)
    The Conflict in Upper Nile State (18 March 2014 update) Three months have elapsed since widespread conflict broke out in South Sudan, and Malakal, Upper Nile’s state capital, remains deserted and largely burned to the ground. The state is patchwork of zones of control, with the rebels holding the largely Nuer south (Longochuk, Maiwut, Nasir, and Ulang counties), and the government retaining the north (Renk), east (Maban and Melut), and the crucial areas around Upper Nile’s oil fields. The rest of the state is contested. The conflict in Upper Nile began as one between different factions within the SPLA but has now broadened to include the targeted ethnic killing of civilians by both sides. With the status of negotiations in Addis Ababa unclear, and the rebel’s 14 March decision to refuse a regional peacekeeping force, conflict in the state shows no sign of ending in the near future. With the first of the seasonal rains now beginning, humanitarian costs of ongoing conflict are likely to be substantial. Conflict began in Upper Nile on 24 December 2013, after a largely Nuer contingent of the Sudan People’s Liberation Army’s (SPLA) 7th division, under the command of General Gathoth Gatkuoth, declared their loyalty to former vice-president Riek Machar and clashed with government troops in Malakal. Fighting continued for three days. The central market was looted and shops set on fire. Clashes also occurred in Tunja (Panyikang county), Wanding (Nasir county), Ulang (Ulang county), and Kokpiet (Baliet county), as the SPLA’s 7th division fragmented, largely along ethnic lines, and clashed among themselves, and with armed civilians.
    [Show full text]
  • South Sudan 2015 Human Rights Report
    SOUTH SUDAN 2015 HUMAN RIGHTS REPORT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY South Sudan is a republic operating under a transitional constitution signed into law upon declaration of independence from Sudan in 2011. President Salva Kiir Mayardit, whose authority derives from his 2010 election as president of what was then the semiautonomous region of Southern Sudan within the Republic of Sudan, led the country. While the 2010 Sudan-wide elections did not wholly meet international standards, international observers believed Kiir’s election reflected the will of a large majority of Southern Sudanese. International observers considered the 2011 referendum on South Sudanese self-determination, in which 98 percent of voters chose to separate from Sudan, to be free and fair. President Kiir is a founding member of the Sudan People’s Liberation Movement (SPLM) political party, the political wing of the Sudan People’s Liberation Army (SPLA). Of the 27 ministries, only 21 had appointed ministers in charge, of which 19 are SPLM representatives. The bicameral legislature consists of 332 seats in the National Legislative Assembly (NLA), of which 296 were filled, and 50 seats in the Council of States. SPLM representatives controlled the vast majority of seats in the legislature. Through presidential decrees Kiir replaced eight of the 10 state governors elected since 2010. The constitution states that an election must be held within 60 days if an elected governor has been relieved by presidential decree. This has not happened. The legislature lacked independence, and the ruling party dominated it. Civilian authorities failed at times to maintain effective control over the security forces. In 2013 armed conflict between government and opposition forces began after violence erupted within the Presidential Guard Force (PG) of the SPLA, also known as the Tiger Division.
    [Show full text]
  • 1.1 Million 3.2 Million 4.9 Million
    South Sudan Crisis Situation report as of 10 April 2014 Report number 31 This report is produced by OCHA South Sudan in collaboration with humanitarian partners. It covers the period from 4 to 10 April 2014. The next report will be published on or around 18 April 2014. Highlights Clashes were reported in northern Upper Nile State, with tension mounting in and around Melut. So far, aid agencies have reached around 1.1 million people, around one third of the people to be assisted by June. Over 960,000 people have been reached with medical interventions. Over 100,000 people are reported to be displaced in and around Kodok, Lul and Wau Shiluk in Upper Nile State. They are in urgent need of assistance. Multi-sector rapid response was ongoing in eight locations in Jonglei, Unity and Upper Nile states, with partners also ready to begin response in Kodok, Upper Nile State. 4.9 million 3.2 million 1.1 million 817,700 People in need of People to be assisted People reached with People internally humanitarian by aid organizations by humanitarian displaced by violence assistance June assistance* since 15 Dec 2013 *This includes people internally displaced, refugees from other countries sheltering in South Sudan and other vulnerable communities who have received assistance since January 2014. This does not mean that the needs of these people have been comprehensively met. Situation overview Clashes were reported in Upper Nile State the Central Equatoria Jonglei 250,000 last days, including in Kaka, 40 kilometres northwest of Melut on 7-8 April, heightening Lakes Unity 200,000 tension in the state and causing some pre- Upper Nile emptive movements of people.
    [Show full text]
  • Ulang Town, Nyangora, Barmach, Ulang County, Upper Nile State
    IRNA Report: [Ulang Town, Nyangora, Barmach, Ulang County, Upper Nile State] [18-20 September 2014] This IRNA Report is a product of Inter-Agency Assessment mission conducted and information compiled based on the inputs provided by partners on the ground including; government authorities, affected communities/IDPs and agencies. Highlights: • Displacement was primarily within Ulang county and IDPs and host community are well integrated • In Ulang town people are primarily returning IDPs while in Nyangora and Barmach they are a mix of IDPs and host community • Preliminary numbers are 8,440 returning IDPs in Ulang town, 4,000 IDPs and 8,000 host community in Nyangora, and 6,300 IDPs and 7,600 host community in Barmach • Proxy malnutrition at very high rates, SAM 16.6%, MAM 28.4%, and GAM 45% Food distribution and re-establishment of health and nutrition services also high priorities • • NGOs planning response include GOAL (health and nutrition), ADRA (education), Nile Hope (protection), NP (protection), Medair (WASH), and Food For the Hungry with WFP (FSL) • As Ulang is on the Malakal – Nasir road, it is vulnerable to attack in the dry season. Contingencies to move operations to Nyangora (across the river in sight of Ulang town) must therefore be in place, or response should focus on Nyangora to begin with. Situation overview From 18-20 September a joint assessment team visited Ulang town, Nyangora, and Barmach in Ulang County, Upper Nile State, to assess reports of humanitarian need resulting from conflict-related displacement that occurred in the first half of 2014. On 18 and 20 September the team assessed Ulang town and on 19 September the team split and assessed Nyangora and Barmach, across the Sobat river from Ulang town.
    [Show full text]
  • Jonglei Unity Upper Nile
    For Humanitarian Purposes Only SOUTH SUDAN Production date: 10 May 2017 Upper Nile State - WASH INDICATOR REACH calculated the areas more likely to have WASH needs basing the estimation on the data collected between February and March 2017 with the Area of Knowledge (AoK) approach, using the Manyo County following methodology. The indicator was created by averaging the percentages of key informants (KIs) reporting on the Wadakona following for specific settlements: - Accessibility to safe drinking water 0% indicates a reported impossibility to access safe Renk County drinking water by all KIs, while 100% indicates safe Sudan drinking water was reported accessible by each KI. Only assessed settlements are shown on the map. Values for different settlements have been averaged and represented with hexagons 10km wide. Melut County Fashoda Maban County County Malakal County Kodok Panyikang Guel Guk Ogod U p p e r N i l e U n i t y County Tonga Malakal Baliet County Pakang Longochuk Udier County Chotbora Longuchok Mathiang Kiech Kon Dome Gum (Kierwan) Mading Maiwut County Ulang Luakpiny/Nasir Kigili County Maiwut Ulang Pagak J o n g l e i County Jikmir Jikou Ethiopia Wanding Sudan 0 25 50 km Data sources: Ethiopia Settlements assessed Boundaries WASH indicator Thematic indicators: REACH Administrative boundaries: UNOCHA; State capital International 0.81 - 1 Settlements: UNOCHA; County capital 0.61 - 0.8 Coordinate System:GCS WGS 1984 C.A.R. County Contact: [email protected] Principal town 0.41 - 0.6 Note: Data, designations and boundaries contained Juba State Village 0.21 - 0.4 on this map are not warranted to be error-free and do not imply acceptance by the REACH partners, Disputed area associates, donors or any other stakeholder D.R.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Sudan's North
    Concordis International Sudan Report September 2010 MORE THAN A LINE: SUDAN’S NORTH - SOUTH BORDER SEPTEMBER 2010 02 Concordis International Sudan Report Contents Contents 04 Acknowledgements 50 Abyei 1.1 Snapshot Summary 1.2 Conflict Drivers 05 Glossary 1.2.1 National Political Context 1.2.2 Border Demarcation and the 08 Executive Summary Abyei Referendum 1.1 General Findings 1.2.3 Physical Demarcation 1.2 Thematic Findings 1.2.4 Land 1.3 Conflict Prone Areas 1.2.5 Militarisation 14 Introduction 1.3.6 Additional Factors 1.1 General Findings 1.4 Conflict Management 1.2 Thematic Findings 1.3 Conflict Prone Areas 67 Southern Kordofan/Unity 1.1 Snapshot Summary 28 South Darfur-Western Bahr al Ghazal 1.2 Conflict Drivers 1.1 Snapshot Summary 1.2.1 Transhumance 1.2 Conflict Drivers 1.2.2 Political Marginalisation 1.2.1 Border demarcation 1.2.3 Hardening Conflict Memory 1.2.2 Militarisation 1.2.4 Land/Oil and Demarcation 1.2.3 SPLA-Rezeigat Clashes 1.2.5 Community Land 1.2.4 Other Armed Groups 1.2.6 Militarisation 1.2.5 Wider Regional Instability 1.2.7 Community Conflict Management 1.2.6 Conflict Trends 1.3 Conflict Trends and Mitigation 1.3 Conflict Mitigation 79 Southern Kordofan 38 South Darfur-Northern Bahr al Ghazal 1.1 Snapshot Summary 1.1 Snapshot Summary 1.2 Conflict Drivers 1.2 Conflict Drivers 1.2.1 National Political Context 1.2.1 Contested Rights Along the 1.2.2 Land Grazing Area 1.2.3 Socio-economic Underdevelopment 1.2.2 Transportation of Arms 1.2.4 Integration of Adminstration 1.2.3 Militarisation 1.2.5 Security Integration and
    [Show full text]
  • Fashoda Youth Forum Allocation Type
    Requesting Organization : Fashoda Youth Forum Allocation Type : 1st Round Standard Allocation Primary Cluster Sub Cluster Percentage EDUCATION 100.00 100 Project Title : Lifesaving Education program for Upper Nile State Allocation Type Category : Frontline services OPS Details Project Code : SSD-16/E/88945 Fund Project Code : SSD-16/HSS10/SA1/E/NGO/695 Cluster : Education Project Budget in US$ : 119,995.15 Planned project duration : 6 months Priority: 1 Planned Start Date : 01/01/2016 Planned End Date : 30/06/2016 Actual Start Date: 01/01/2016 Actual End Date: 30/06/2016 Project Summary : The aim of this project is to provide life-saving education and youth-focused life skills vocational training for a total of 3,350 children, that is –1650 displaced children and 1700 host community children of both (girls and boys) and 125 adult (60 Teachers and 65 PTAs (men and women) in both Lul and Kodok Payams of Fashoda County. The project will provide training and services in life skills, PSS and child protection in schools, and also provide youth-focused PSS and Life Skills training for young people out of school in order to enroll them back into schools activities. TLS constructed earlier will be maintained to provide access to learning activities for the children school facilities will be rehabilitated also to provide child-friendly spaces which can continue to deliver lifesaving messages to the children. Sanitation facilities will be provided also to all the school facilities to prevent the spread of diseases and awareness on cholera will be raised thus promoting healthy and hygienic school environments.
    [Show full text]