Wyndemere Refining Story (1) 48 Slides

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Wyndemere Refining Story (1) 48 Slides 75 years after D-Day, we salute our veterans Are There Really No Solutions to Climate Change and Clean Energy? Bob Anderson UOP retiree Adjunct Professor of Chemical Engineering Illinois Institute of Technology Let’s examine a few ideas Further improvements to automobile design and fuels production ? Solar–photovoltaic Solar thermal x Wind Turbines Nuclear Bud Schweppe is reaching for his checkBook 1934 Chevrolet Boxcar First attempt at aerodynamics Tail fins and fender skirts and 6 miles/gal Toyota Prius, an early hyBrid 55 miles/gal Tesla all electric for ~$100 K Automobile improvements Over 120 years cars have become safer, more comfortable, more reliable, more efficient, and more powerful Dozens of manufacturers worldwide compete fiercely Oil industry had to compete fiercely and keep up with demands of the car companies and government ◦ Increasing octane number of gasoline ◦ Creation of leadfree gasoline ◦ Chemical composition of reformulated gasoline ◦ Better lubricants Historical Development of Electric Car Around 1900, electric automobiles were introduced ◦ Heavy lead acid batteries ◦ Mostly used for in-town use Gasoline powered cars were thought to be dangerous ◦ One state required a person to walk in front of a car carrying a red flag to warn others (wouldn’t work on the Eisenhower today, the walker would get downtown way ahead of the car) ◦ When they broke down somebody yelled “get a horse!” Gasoline won the Battle Electrics were not practical for long trips Many brands were introduced, often produced by buggy makers Henry Ford developed the idea of a production line with the goal of making cars affordable to the average citizen Before electric starters, the driver had to pull a crank that started the engine by rotating the flywheel and often broke arms 1920’s and 1930’s Engines became more powerful (bootleggers and gangsters loved it) Electric starters were invented The compression ratio/gasoline octane race began Cars were hard to steer, brakes were ineffective Manual transmissions required frequent shifting to accelerate or climb hills 1940’s and 1950’s World War II required production to meet military requirements – no civilian cars Gasoline, rubber, metals were “unavailable” Postwar demand created large markets for large manufacturers such as Ford, General Motors, and Chrysler Power and speed became the basis for competition Radio and heater were popular options Technology Evolution 50’s and 60’s Automatic transmissions Power brakes Power steering Air conditioning Catalytic converters for conversion of Carbon Monoxide and hydrocarbons in the exhaust Big V-8’s and big bodies (with tail fins) Mostly steel, and about 1/2” thick Fuel Economy 4000 pound cars with 425 horsepower averaged 6-8 miles/gallon ($.50/gallon) High octane gasoline used TEL (tetra ethyl lead) Combination of effect of lead on human brains and catalytic and catalytic converters required lead to be phased out Aerodynamics similar to railroad box car Impact of Lead Elimination Octane rating dropped about 10 numbers Engine compression ratios were dropped from 11:1 to 8:1 Reduced vehicle weight was one way to regain performance Engine technology began rapid evolution ◦ Fuel injection for better air/fuel ratio control ◦ More sophisticated camshafts allowed for optimum valve opening and closing Foreign Cars Became Popular Japanese manufacturers were expert in smaller, more efficient vehicles Original Hondas and Datsuns were not well suited to US driving conditions and were not very reliable – remember toys made in Japan? Japanese learned about quality from W. Edwards Deming, a US statistician who was ignored by US car companies Technology to Improve Fuel Economy Aluminum used for many body parts Plastics used for inside Lighter weight engines Aerodynamic styling Friction reduction Multi-speed automatic transmissions Radial tires Government-mandated Fuel Economy Debate was between government-mandated vehicle design and setting standards and letting competition loose 20 miles per gallon became routine 55 mph speed limits intended to reduce fuel consumption and CO2 emission (unpopular in Texas) Japanese demonstrated 30 mpg Previous administration’s goal had been 54.5 mpg (now dropped) Technology to improve safety Antilock brakes Side impact channels Energy-absorbing front end Seat belts Air bags Collision avoidance systems Safety glass Blind spot alarms Birth of the HyBrid Gasoline engines are terribly inefficient from zero to about 20 mph Idling engines at stoplights and railroad crossings waste fuel and create emissions Brakes work by converting the kinetic energy of the moving automobile to frictional heat – total waste – now regenerative braking recharges battery Electric motors are efficient while gasoline engines are not (90% vs 28%) Summary of automoBile technology We have come a long way ◦ Performance ◦ Environmental impact ◦ Safety ◦ Comfort ◦ Electricity coming back for another round But it took 120 years! ◦ Big companies ◦ Racing teams ◦ Entrepreneurs ◦ Market pressure How did the oil Business keep up? Henry Ford started it all Clarence G. Gerhold, one of many UOP Pioneers For 105 years, UOP, the company I worked, for has been right in the middle of the fracas Larry Gerhold started at UOP in 1928 from U of Illinois with an MS ChE degree First year on the job he figured out how to raise the octane number of gasoline Went on to develop technologies that are the foundation of the petrochemical industry Served many years as technical advisor to senior management Does anybody here recognize him? Vladimir Ipatieff kept it going Born in Moscow 1867 died in Chicago 1952 Czar Nicholas and his family were shot in Ipatieff family vacation house July 17, 1918 Became a General in the Army Chemistry professor and head of the Science Academy Father of petroleum chemistry, explosives, catalysts Came to Northwestern and UOP (escape story) More than 500 patents Famous for the Ipatieff sample container Teacher of Val Haensel World War II drove invention oFluid Catalytic Cracking o Natural clay catalyst o 1000°F reactor 1350°F regenerator o Coke combustion provided heat of reaction oHF Alkylation oSynthetic Rubber oMulti-story vessels oCatalyst circulation rate thousands of tons per hour oCouple hundred million dollars capital cost oMajor opportunity for energy recovery oLate 1940s, Vladimir Haensel at UOP proposed using platinum as a catalyst for reforming naphtha to high octane gasoline oHigh temperature in presence of hydrogen - 950°F oInitial response was ridicule, using an expensive jewelry material in an oil refinery! o145 US patents, 600 commercial units oEverybody wanted a sample of the catalyst to see if they could steal the invention oRemember President Reagan’s jelly beans? oOur lab guys made up a batch of catalyst using cadmium, cobalt, molybdenum, zinc, chrome, and a tiny bit of platinum Do you remember Ethyl? (leaded gasoline) – what happened? Think about Flint, Michigan with their lead in drinking water We used to paint our houses and metal furniture with paint containing lead We used to put 3cc of tetraethyl lead (TEL) into each gallon of gasoline (.08%) for about 10 octane boost In crowded cities where kids played near streets, they were found to have high lead levels – bad news Lead was taken out of paint and the EPA said “take the lead out of gasoline”. 10 numbers is a lot to achieve by changing the refining processes, but we did and by early 70’s The government never fails to amuse me – while lead was being removed from our gasoline under force of law, the Chinese were allowed to sell their gasoline in the US with 4.6 cc/gal TEL (1970s) Why must we Buy gasoline with 10% ethanol Thank the EPA for that one, their solution to smog in LA, Chicago, Denver etc. Doesn’t it poke a finger in the Arab’s eye? Nope. Isn’t it great that we make it in America? Nope. Isn’t it cheaper? Nope. Does it clean up the exhaust? No. So who benefits? I’ll let you think about that one for a few minutes. What are the economics? Farmers looked at growing corn, taking it to a fermenter, and transporting. Farmers are smart. They found that the price they could sell ethanol for did not cover the cost of seed, plowing, planting, irrigating, cultivating, fertilizer, herbicides, insecticides, and harvesting labor. So the EPA said “How about we give you a bribe incentive of $.50 per gallon?” Oil doesn’t mix with water but it is fully miscible with politics Fracking Reason the market price of natural gas dropped from $12 to $2/1,000 cubic feet a few years ago Directional drilling ◦ Used to be you could only drill straight down – hope your info and aim is good ◦ Now you can drill around the corner – like into your neighbor’s field Hydraulic stimulation ◦ Oil is tightly held underground in sandy or shale formations ◦ It is viscous and happy where it is ◦ Previously put steam down the well to soften it, sometimes also fire ◦ Now massive volumes of water with chemical additives and detergents are pumped down at very high pressure ◦ Yield increases a lot, more supply, lower marginal cost of production means lower prices Summary of the oil Business Over 100 high tech processes to make whatever fuel or petrochemical the market wants Sophisticated high temperature and high pressure equipment Hundreds of catalysts to make reactions go faster and more selectively Intense competition from operating companies such as Shell, Exxon, Mobil, BP; government agencies such as French IFP; independent technology developers such as UOP Strategic plans now recognize that gasoline and diesel engines will be going away, so oil companies are now focusing on petrochemicals Soon every car will Be availaBle all electric Range anxiety Number and location of recharging stations Big boost in electricity demand Huge peaking problem if everybody wants to charge at 6 pm Mechanics and dealer service departments will starve – no tuneups, oil changes, no fuel systems, transmissions, etc.
Recommended publications
  • National Academy of Sciences July 1, 1979 Officers
    NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES JULY 1, 1979 OFFICERS Term expires President-PHILIP HANDLER June 30, 1981 Vice-President-SAUNDERS MAC LANE June 30, 1981 Home Secretary-BRYCE CRAWFORD,JR. June 30, 1983 Foreign Secretary-THOMAS F. MALONE June 30, 1982 Treasurer-E. R. PIORE June 30, 1980 Executive Officer Comptroller Robert M. White David Williams COUNCIL Abelson, Philip H. (1981) Markert,C. L. (1980) Berg, Paul (1982) Nierenberg,William A. (1982) Berliner, Robert W. (1981) Piore, E. R. (1980) Bing, R. H. (1980) Ranney, H. M. (1980) Crawford,Bryce, Jr. (1983) Simon, Herbert A. (1981) Friedman, Herbert (1982) Solow, R. M. (1980) Handler, Philip (1981) Thomas, Lewis (1982) Mac Lane, Saunders (1981) Townes, Charles H. (1981) Malone, Thomas F. (1982) Downloaded by guest on September 30, 2021 SECTIONS The Academyis divided into the followingSections, to which membersare assigned at their own choice: (11) Mathematics (31) Engineering (12) Astronomy (32) Applied Biology (13) Physics (33) Applied Physical and (14) Chemistry Mathematical Sciences (15) Geology (41) Medical Genetics Hema- (16) Geophysics tology, and Oncology (21) Biochemistry (42) Medical Physiology, En- (22) Cellularand Develop- docrinology,and Me- mental Biology tabolism (23) Physiological and Phar- (43) Medical Microbiology macologicalSciences and Immunology (24) Neurobiology (51) Anthropology (25) Botany (52) Psychology (26) Genetics (53) Social and Political Sci- (27) Population Biology, Evo- ences lution, and Ecology (54) Economic Sciences In the alphabetical list of members,the numbersin parentheses, followingyear of election, indicate the respective Class and Section of the member. CLASSES The members of Sections are grouped in the following Classes: I. Physical and Mathematical Sciences (Sections 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16).
    [Show full text]
  • E Helsinki Forum and East-West Scientific Exchange
    [E HELSINKI FORUM AND EAST-WEST SCIENTIFIC EXCHANGE JOINT HEARING BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEE ON SCIENCE, RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY OF THE COMMITTEE ON SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY AND THE Sul COMMITTEE ON INTERNATIONAL SECURITY AND SCIENTIFIC AFFAIRS OF THE COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN AFFAIRS HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES AND THE COMMISSION ON SECURITY AND COOPERATION IN EUROPE NINETY-SIXTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION JANUARY 31, 1980 [No. 89] (Committee on Science and Technology) ted for the use of the Committee on Science and Technology and the Committee on Foreign Affairs U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 421 0 WASHINGTON: 1980 COMMITTEE ON SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY DON FUQUA, Florida, Chairman ROBERT A. ROE, New Jersey JOHN W. WYDLER, New York MIKE McCORMACK, Washington LARRY WINN. JR., Kansas GEORGE E. BROWN, JR., California BARRY M. GOLDWATER, JR., California JAMES H. SCHEUER, New York HAMILTON FISH, JS., New York RICHARD L. OTTINGER, New York MANUEL LUJAN, JR., New Mexico TOM HARKIN, Iowa HAROLD C. HOLLENBECK, New Jersey JIM LLOYD, California ROBERT K. DORNAN, California JEROME A. AMBRO, New York ROBERT S. WALKER, Pennsylvania MARILYN LLOYD BOUQUARD, Tennessee EDWIN B. FORSYTHE, NeW Jersey JAMES J. BLANCHARD, Michigan KEN KRAMER, Colorado DOUG WALGREN, Pennsylvania WILLIAM CARNEY, New York RONNIE G. FLIPPO, Alabama ROBERT W. DAVIS, Michigan DAN GLICKMAN, Kansas TOBY ROTH, Wisconsin ALBERT GORE, JR., Tennessee DONALD LAWRENCE RITTER, WES WATKINS, Oklahoma Pennsylvania ROBERT A. YOUNG, Missouri BILL ROYER, California RICHARD C. WHITE, Texas HAROLD L. VOLKMER, Missouri DONALD J. PEASE, Ohio HOWARD WOLPE, Michigan NICHOLAS MAVROULES, Massachusetts BILL NELSON, Florida BERYL ANTHONY, JR., Arkansas STANLEY N. LUNDINE, New York ALLEN E.
    [Show full text]
  • UNITED STATES PATENT OFFICE 2,478,916 REFORMING Process Vladimir Haensel, Clarendon Hills, and Curtis F
    Patented Aug. 16, 1949 2.478,916 UNITED STATES PATENT OFFICE 2,478,916 REFORMING PRocess Vladimir Haensel, Clarendon Hills, and Curtis F. Gerald, Riverside, E., assignors to Universa Oil Products Company, Chicago, I., a corporation of Delaware No Drawing. Application December 21, 1946, Serial No. 71,659 13 Claims. (Cl 196-50) 2 This invention relates to a reforming process mally liquid hydrocarbons substantially or con and more particularly to a process for the re pletely into normally gaseous hydrocarbons. forming of a saturated gasoline fraction in the The desired selective cracking generally com presence of a particular catalyst and under se prises the removal of methyl, ethyl and, to a lected conditions of operation. lesser extent, propyl groups, in the form of The saturated gasoline fraction to be treat methane, ethane and propane as will be herein ed in accordance with the present invention after described. However, the removal of these comprise straight run gasolines, natural gaso radicals is controlled so that not more than. One lines, etc. The gasoline fraction may be a full or possibly two of such radicals are removed boiling range gasoline having an initial boiling O from a given molecule. For example, heptane point within the range of about 50 to about may be reduced to hexane, nonane to Octane or 90 F. and an end boiling point within the heptane, etc. On the other hand uncontrolled range of about 375 to about 4.25° F., or it may or non-selective cracking will result in the de be a selected fraction thereof which usually will composition of normally liquid hydrocarbons be a higher boiling fraction, commonly referred into normally gaseous hydrocarbons as, for ex to as naphtha, and generally having an initial ample, by the continued demethylation of nor boiling point of from about 150 to about 250 F.
    [Show full text]
  • Catalysis: Change for the Better
    Catalysis: Change for the Better Grade Level petroleum into the high-level fuels that we rely on for nearly all our transportation Elementary through middle school with adult needs. It also produces "aromatic" assistance. petrochemicals, the raw materials used in the manufacture of plastics and fibers. High school This new idea in catalysts, and the ideas Materials that followed, have made our fuel more efficient, environmentally-friendly and easier Ordinary sugar cubes and cheaper to produce. It has also made Matches the plastics industry more environmentally- Ash friendly. Metal plate or can lid In 1998, Vladimir Haensel received the Charles Stark Draper Prize, a $450,000 Discussion award, for his work. This award is the "Nobel Prize" of engineering. it is presented by the Sometimes a chemical reaction won't take National Academy of Engineering, with an place, or will proceed very slowly, unless endowment from the Charles Stark Draper some other substance is added. That other Laboratory. Charles Stark Draper was an substance is called a catalyst, which engineer and "father" of modern inertial hastens the action but is not part of it and guidance systems, used in commercial does not change. Catalysts are widely used aircraft, space vehicles, strategic missiles, in the chemical industry to speed up and submarines. Draper also developed the reactions. An important use of catalysts is in sophisticated navigational system that the making of gasoline from crude oil. landed the Apollo astronauts on the moon and returned them safely to earth. In 1949 at Universal Oil Products (now UOP), chemical engineer Vladimir Haensel developed a revolutionary process called Platforming.
    [Show full text]
  • Aiche Separations Division Newsletter 2019
    AIChE Separations Division Newsletter 2019 Words from the Division Chair The Separations Division has provided knowledge and networking opportunities for AIChE members in the In this issue areas of separation science and technology since 1990. It is one of the biggest AIChE Divisions with more than 500 members and a large programming at the Annual Words from the Division Meeting. The primary objective of the Division Chair …………………………..….1 continues to be the development of technical AIChE Engage - Separations programming for the AIChE Spring and Annual Division ……………………......3 meetings, covering a variety of used and novel separation processes and materials developments in 8 Separations Division major separation areas. At the Spring 2019 Meeting in New Orleans, the Division Awards…………………..….……4 sponsored or co-sponsored 10 oral presentation sessions associated with a Topical Highlights from the 2019 Distillation Symposium. At the Fall 2019 Annual Meeting in Orlando, the Division AIChE Annual sponsored 59 oral presentation sessions, 4 Poster Sessions and 11 co-sponsored Meeting………………………….8 sessions with other Divisions. The programming efforts have been coordinated by the Division Chair along with our eight Area Chairs: Marcus Mello (Area 2), Andrew Sloley 2019 Graduate Student (Area 2A), Seth Huggins (Area 2B), George Goff (Area 2C), Haiqing Li (Area 2D), Stefano Research Awards ………….13 Brandani (Area 2E), Seyi Odueyungbo (Area 2F), Nick Merchant (Area 2G) and Josh Election Results for Thompson (Area 2H). I would like to thank each of the Area Chairs for their service and 2020……………………………..15 efforts to develop a strong programming for our Division and AIChE members in 2019. 2019 Separations Division In addition to the regular oral presentation sessions, the Division hosted 4 poster Officers ………………..……….18 sessions and we had our poster competition reinstated thanks to the initiative and coordination of our 1st Vice-Chair Ranil Wickramasinghe with the help of graduate 2019 Separations Division Area Chairs ……………..…...19 students.
    [Show full text]
  • 19788 NAE Bridge V33n1
    Spring 2003 The BRIDGE LINKING ENGINEERING AND SOCIETY Computing Meets the Physical World Butler Lampson Autonomous Robot Soccer Teams Manuela Veloso Flying with Animals Part One: Linking Artificial Information-Processing Machines and Living Information-Processing Machines Chris Diorio Part Two: Interfacing Computer Electronics with Biology Thomas Daniel Entering the Brain: New Tools for Precision Surgery Eric Grimson Promoting the technological welfare of the nation by marshalling the knowledge and insights of eminent members of the engineering profession. The BRIDGE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF ENGINEERING George M.C. Fisher, Chair Wm. A. Wulf, President Sheila E. Widnall, Vice President W. Dale Compton, Home Secretary Harold K. Forsen, Foreign Secretary William L. Friend, Treasurer Editor-in-Chief George Bugliarello (Interim) Managing Editor: Carol R. Arenberg Production Assistants: Penelope Gibbs, Kimberly West The Bridge (USPS 551-240) is published quarterly by the National Academy of Engineering, 2101 Constitution Avenue, N.W., Washington, DC 20418. Periodicals postage paid at Washington, D.C. Vol. 33, No. 1 Spring 2003 Postmaster: Send address changes to The Bridge, 2101 Constitution Avenue, N.W., Washington, DC 20418. Papers are presented in The Bridge on the basis of general interest and time- liness. They reflect the views of the authors and not necessarily the position of the National Academy of Engineering. The Bridge is printed on recycled paper. © 2003 by the National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. A complete copy of each issue of The Bridge is available in PDF format at http://www.nae.edu/TheBridge. Some of the articles in this issue are also available as HTML documents and may contain links to related sources of information, multimedia files, or other content.
    [Show full text]
  • Fritz J. and Dolores H. Russ Prize
    2011 –2012 CALL FOR NOMINATIONS DRAPER ◆ RUSS GORDON ◆ FOUNDERS ◆ BUECHE NAE AWARDS Charles Stark Draper Prize Fritz J. and Dolores H. Russ Prize Bernard M. Gordon Prize Founders Award Arthur M. Bueche Award The National Academy of Engineering . Recognizing the Engineers Behind the Achievements The National Academy of Engineering (NAE) serves the riculum vitae of no more than two pages per candidate. United States government and the engineering community Though not required, you may also choose to submit the by advising on technology issues that impact society. candidate’s bibliographical listing of no more than two Each year the NAE salutes leaders in engineering for their pages. lifetime dedication to their field and their commitment to The nominator is responsible for soliciting supporting letters advancing the human condition through great engineering and ensuring that the letters are submitted to the NAE by the achievement and/or through innovation in engineering submission deadline. Supporting letters may be addressed to and technology education. The NAE dedicates more than the nominator or selection committee chair and forwarded $1 million annually to recognize these leaders and to bring to the NAE Awards Office. Note: Nominations without better understanding of the importance of engineering and supporting letters will not be considered. Supporting let- engineering education to society. ters may accompany the nomination cover form or may be The NAE currently presents five awards for engineering sent separately, however all components of the nomination achievement and innovation—the Charles Stark Draper must be received by April 1, 2011. Prize, the Fritz J. and Dolores H. Russ Prize, the Bernard Highly competitive nominations from previous years will M.
    [Show full text]
  • Memorial Tributes: Volume 3
    THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES PRESS This PDF is available at http://nap.edu/1384 SHARE Memorial Tributes: Volume 3 DETAILS 381 pages | 6 x 9 | HARDBACK ISBN 978-0-309-03939-0 | DOI 10.17226/1384 CONTRIBUTORS GET THIS BOOK National Academy of Engineering FIND RELATED TITLES Visit the National Academies Press at NAP.edu and login or register to get: – Access to free PDF downloads of thousands of scientific reports – 10% off the price of print titles – Email or social media notifications of new titles related to your interests – Special offers and discounts Distribution, posting, or copying of this PDF is strictly prohibited without written permission of the National Academies Press. (Request Permission) Unless otherwise indicated, all materials in this PDF are copyrighted by the National Academy of Sciences. Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. Memorial Tributes: Volume 3 i Memorial Tributes National Academy of Engineering Copyright National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. Memorial Tributes: Volume 3 ii Copyright National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. Memorial Tributes: Volume 3 iii Memorial Tributes Volume 3 National Academy of Engineering of the United States of America NATIONAL ACADEMY PRESS Washington, D.C. 1989 Copyright National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. Memorial Tributes: Volume 3 iv National Academy Press 2101 Constitution Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20418 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data (Revised for vol. 3) National Academy of Engineering. Memorial tributes. Vol. 3– imprint: Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. 1. Engineers—United States—Biography. I. Title. TA139.N34 1979 620'.0092`2 79-21053 ISBN 0-309-03482-5 (v.
    [Show full text]
  • Catalytic Reforming
    Catalytic reforming Catalytic reforming is a chemical process used to convert petroleum refinery naphthas distilled from crude oil (typically having low octane ratings) into high-octane liquid products called reformates, which are premium blending stocks for high-octane gasoline. The process converts low-octane linear hydrocarbons (paraffins) into branched alkanes (isoparaffins) and cyclic naphthenes, which are then partially dehydrogenated to produce high-octane aromatic hydrocarbons. The dehydrogenation also produces significant amounts of byproduct hydrogen gas, which is fed into other refinery processes such as hydrocracking. A side reaction is hydrogenolysis, which produces light hydrocarbons of lower value, such as methane, ethane, propane and butanes. In addition to a gasoline blending stock, reformate is the main source of aromatic bulk chemicals such as benzene, toluene, xylene and ethylbenzene which have diverse uses, most importantly as raw materials for conversion into plastics. However, the benzene content of reformate makes it carcinogenic, which has led to governmental regulations effectively requiring further processing to reduce its benzene content. This process is quite different from and not to be confused with the catalytic steam reforming process used industrially to produce products such as hydrogen, ammonia, and methanol from natural gas, naphtha or other petroleum-derived feedstocks. Nor is this process to be confused with various other catalytic reforming processes that use methanol or biomass-derived feedstocks to produce hydrogen for fuel cells or other uses. Contents History Chemistry Typical naphtha feedstocks The reaction chemistry Model reactions using lumping technique Process description Catalysts and mechanisms Weaknesses and Competition Economics References External links History In the 1940s, Vladimir Haensel,[1] a research chemist working for Universal Oil Products (UOP), developed a catalytic reforming process using a catalyst containing platinum.
    [Show full text]
  • Draper at 25
    Draper at 25 Innovation for the 21st Century Our Cover: For the International Space Station (ISS) Alpha program, Draper is exploring how best to control the flexible, unwieldy and variable structure of the ISS. Draper at 25 Innovation for the 21st Century By Christopher Morgan with Joseph O’Connor and David Hoag 1 This replica medal of the Draper Prize accompanied Colonel Kenneth Cameron, USMC, astronaut and former Draper Fellow, aboard Space Shuttle flight STS-37 in 1991. Cameron presented the medal to then-President Ralph Jacobson, saying “ It flew in Atlantis and, in fact, it’s been 93 orbits and 2-1/2 million miles to come back home to you.” 2 Introduction By Vincent Vitto President and CEO, Draper Laboratory On July 1, 1973, Draper Laboratory was separated from The Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) and became an independent not-for-profit research and development corporation. This souvenir history commemorates the 25th anniversary of our independence. It reflects on the triumphs and trials that have made the Laboratory what it is today, and provides a view of Draper in the 21st century. It describes the conflicts of the late 1960s and early 1970s that led to the divestment from MIT. It chronicles the successes of the Apollo and Fleet Ballistic Missile (FBM) programs, and shows how the Lab prevailed through the difficult post-Cold War years and is now positioned for the future. This history honors over six decades of engineering achievements dating from the early days of the MIT Instrumentation Laboratory and the legacy of Doctor Charles Stark Draper.
    [Show full text]
  • Pdf 604.05 Kb
    Tuofunctional Platinum Catalysts in the Petroleum Industry By Vladimir Haensel and Herman S. Bloch Universal Oil Products Company, Des Plaines, Illinois The transition of petroleum refining from undergoing a number of reactions under the relatively simple thermal operations to more conditions of high temperature and pressure selective and efficient catalytic processes has prevalent in the reactor. The platinum and been one of the major advances of industrial acid functions in co-action with each other chemistry in modern times. This transition and with the support are balanced with the has been made possible by the development operating conditions to achieve a proper of highly selective catalysts designed to meet control of the several possible reactions of the exacting requirements of modern petrol- each of these hydrocarbon types, so that the eum conversion processes. Of such catalysts, course of the reaction is directed toward the those containing platinum as an active production of a maximum yield of desired component have dominated the petroleum product with a minimum amount of un- refining art during the past decade. desirable by-products. The ability to “tailor-make” catalysts for Catalytic reforming involves four primary specific purposes is well illustrated by the reactions. These are dehydrogenation of case of four duofunctional catalysts developed naphthenes containing either five- or six- for the petroleum refining industry by membered rings to aromatics, the de- Universal Oil Products Company and widely hydrocyclisation of paraffins to aromatics, used in processes licensed by it throughout the hydrocracking of higher to lower boiling the Western hemisphere. These catalysts- paraffins, and the isomerisation of paraffins to Platforming, Penex, Butamer and Hydrar*- more highly branched structures.
    [Show full text]
  • Biographical Memoir by STANLEY GEMBICKI
    NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES VLADIMIR HAENSEL 1914–2002 A Biographical Memoir by STANLEY GEMBICKI Any opinions expressed in this memoir are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Academy of Sciences. Biographical Memoirs, VOLUME 88 PUBLISHED 2006 NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES WASHINGTON, D.C. VLADIMIR HAENSEL September 1, 1914–December 15, 2002 BY STANLEY GEMBICKI LADIMIR (“VAL”) HAENSEL WAS born to Nina Von Tugenhold V and Paul Haensel (Pavel Petrovich Genzel) on Septem- ber 1, 1914 (one month after the outbreak of World War I) in Freiburg, Germany. He spent much of his youth in Mos- cow, where his father was a respected professor of econom- ics from 1903 to 1928. Shocked by the outbreak of the Bolshevik Revolution, his family fled Moscow, but was cap- tured and returned to meet an uncertain fate. Officially rehabilitated, his father resumed his professorship and was made director of the financial section of the Institute of Economic Research in Moscow from 1921 to 1928; there he authored Lenin’s first five-year plan. After escaping the U.S.S.R. in 1928, the Haensel family lived briefly in Ger- many, France, and Austria. They came to the United States in 1930 when Haensel’s father accepted a teaching position at Northwestern University. Haensel entered Northwestern University in 1931 and received a bachelor of science degree in general engineer- ing in 1935. He received his master’s degree in chemical engineering from the Massachusetts Institute of Technol- ogy in 1937. Haensel joined the Universal Oil Products Company in 1937 as a research chemist.
    [Show full text]