DOCSLIB.ORG

Memorial Tributes: Volume 3

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES PRESS This PDF is available at http://nap.edu/1384 SHARE Memorial Tributes: Volume 3 DETAILS 381 pages | 6 x 9 | HARDBACK ISBN 978-0-309-03939-0 | DOI 10.17226/1384 CONTRIBUTORS GET THIS BOOK National Academy of Engineering FIND RELATED TITLES Visit the National Academies Press at NAP.edu and login or register to get: – Access to free PDF downloads of thousands of scientific reports – 10% off the price of print titles – Email or social media notifications of new titles related to your interests – Special offers and discounts Distribution, posting, or copying of this PDF is strictly prohibited without written permission of the National Academies Press. (Request Permission) Unless otherwise indicated, all materials in this PDF are copyrighted by the National Academy of Sciences. Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. Memorial Tributes: Volume 3 i Memorial Tributes National Academy of Engineering Copyright National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. Memorial Tributes: Volume 3 ii Copyright National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. Memorial Tributes: Volume 3 iii Memorial Tributes Volume 3 National Academy of Engineering of the United States of America NATIONAL ACADEMY PRESS Washington, D.C. 1989 Copyright National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. Memorial Tributes: Volume 3 iv National Academy Press 2101 Constitution Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20418 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data (Revised for vol. 3) National Academy of Engineering. Memorial tributes. Vol. 3– imprint: Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. 1. Engineers—United States—Biography. I. Title. TA139.N34 1979 620'.0092`2 79-21053 ISBN 0-309-03482-5 (v. 2) ISBN 0-309-03939-8 (v. 3) Printed in the United States of America Copyright National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. Memorial Tributes: Volume 3 CONTENTS v Contents Foreword xi Stuart Lawrence Bailey 3 by Alexander H. Flax Jack Anthony Baird 9 by Ian M. Ross Robert Alt Baker, Sr. 15 by John W. Simpson Thomas Baron 19 by Monroe E. Spaght Richard E. Bellman 23 by Solomon W. Golomb Maurice Anthony Biot 31 by Raymond D. Mindlin Raymond L. Bisplinghoff 37 by H. Guyford Stever Hans Heinrich Bleich 45 by Mario G. Salvadori Copyright National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. Memorial Tributes: Volume 3 CONTENTS vi Hendrik Wade Bode 51 by Harvey Brooks Donald B. Broughton 57 by C. G. Gerhold submitted by Vladimir Haensel Adolf Busemann 63 by Robert T. Jones Robert W. Cairns 69 by Alexander H. Flax Edward John Cleary 75 by Alexander H. Flax Frank Allen Cleveland 81 Anonymous Norman Arland Copeland 89 by Robert L. Pigford and Sheldon E. Isakoff Stanley Corrsin 95 by Hans W. Liepmann Luigi Crocco 101 by Seymour M. Bogdonoff A. Earl Cullum, Jr. 107 by Arthur A. Collins and Jerry Stover Peter Victor Danckwerts 113 by John Davidson Marcel Dassault 119 by Thomas V. Jones Copyright National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. Memorial Tributes: Volume 3 CONTENTS vii Walter Spaulding Douglas 125 by Thomas Kuesel Thomas Bradford Drew 133 by Sheldon Isakoff Pol E. Duwez 139 by Morris Cohen Phillip Eisenberg 145 by John V. Wehausen Elmer W. Engstrom 151 by William Webster Vivian Fitzgeorge Estcourt 157 by James N. Landis Phil Moss Ferguson 165 by Earnest F. Gloyna and John E. Breen John Earl Frazier 171 by J. E. Burke King-Sun Fu 175 by M. E. Van Valkenburg Wilfred Mcgregor Hall 179 by Charles C. Noble John Dickson Harper 185 by Allen S. Russell Albert G. Holzman 193 by Donald C. Burnham Stanley George Hooker 197 by Gerhard Neumann Copyright National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. Memorial Tributes: Volume 3 CONTENTS viii Frederick Johnson Hooven 201 by Myron Tribus Olaf Andreas Hougen 207 by Chalmer Kirkbride Herbert E. Hudson, Jr. 213 by Richard Hazen Jerome Clarke Hunsaker 219 by Arthur E. Raymond Tamaki Ipponmatsu 225 by Walker L. Cisler George William Kessler 229 by Walter Bachman Edward Wilson Kimbark 233 by Eugene C. Starr Thurston E. Larson 237 by Richard S. Engelbrecht and William C. Ackermann Harold B. Law 243 by Humboldt W. Leverenz George Michael Low 251 by James C. Fletcher Hans Adolph Mauch 259 by Eugene Murphy Robert Charles McMaster 267 by Robert I. Jaffee Copyright National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. Memorial Tributes: Volume 3 CONTENTS ix Theodore J. Nagel 273 by John E. Dolan Herbert M. Parker 279 by Merril Eisenbud Joseph Mayo Pettit 285 by William Kays, Oswald Villard, Jr., and William Rambo Hyman George Rickover 291 by John W. Simpson Gerard Addison Rohlich 299 by Earnest F. Gloyna George John Schroepfer 305 by Joseph T. Ling Donald Bellamy Sinclair 311 by Gordon S. Brown Alfred Dodd Starbird 317 by John S. Foster Robert E. Stewart 323 by Gordon H. Millar James Hobson Stratton 327 by Wilson Binger John George Trump 333 by Louis Smullin Herbert D. Vogel 339 by Harry E. Bovay Charles Howard Vollum 347 by William R. Hewlett Copyright National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. Memorial Tributes: Volume 3 CONTENTS x Edward C. Wells 351 by Edward H. Hememann Stanley Dewolf Wilson 355 by Ralph B. Peck George Winter 361 by Anton Tedesko Appendix 367 Acknowledgments for the Photographs 369 Copyright National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. Memorial Tributes: Volume 3 FOREWORD xi Foreword This is the third volume in the series of Memorial Tributes issued periodically by the National Academy of Engineering to honor the deceased members and foreign associates of the Academy. Publication of this volume contributes to the observance of the twenty-fifth anniversary of the founding of the NAE on December 5, 1964. It is intended that these volumes will stand as an enduring record of the many contributions of engineering to the benefit of human-kind. In all cases, the authors of the tributes had personal knowledge of the interests and engineering accomplishments of the deceased members and foreign associates. The National Academy of Engineering is a private organization established in 1964 to share in the responsibility given the National Academy of Sciences under its congressional charter signed by President Lincoln in 1863 to examine and report on questions of science and engineering at the request of the federal government. Individuals are elected to the National Academy of Engineering on the basis of significant contributions to engineering theory and practice and to the literature of engineering or demonstrated unusual accomplishments in the pioneering of new and developing fields of technology. ALEXANDER H. FLAX HOME SECRETARY Copyright National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. Memorial Tributes: Volume 3 FOREWORD xii Copyright National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. Memorial Tributes: Volume 3 1 Memorial Tributes National Academy of Engineering Copyright National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. Memorial Tributes: Volume 3 STUART LAWRENCE BAILEY 2 Copyright National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. Memorial Tributes: Volume 3 STUART LAWRENCE BAILEY 3 Stuart Lawrence Bailey 1905–1984 by Alexander H. Flax Stuart Lawrence Bailey, former president of Jansky and Bailey, Inc., and vice-president of the Atlantic Research Corporation until his retirement in 1970, died on August 11, 1984, at the age of seventy-eight. Bailey was known for his outstanding personal contributions and pioneering work in three main areas: (1) the development of air navigation radio aids; (2) radio signal propagation measurements, which were applied to the design and location of broadcasting stations; (3) the development of transmission standards for service and interference in AM and FM radio and in television broadcasting. Stuart Bailey was born on October 7, 1905, in Minneapolis, Minnesota. He received a B.S. in electrical engineering from the University of Minnesota in 1927 and an M.S. in electrical engineering the following year. As an undergraduate, he was active on the staff of W9XI, an experimental radio station at the university. During his graduate work, Bailey was the chief engineer of radio station WLB, which was owned and operated by the university. It was also during these years at the University of Minnesota that Bailey met C. M. Jansky, who was later to play a major role in his professional and personal life. Bailey spent three years (1928–1930) in Minnesota working Copyright National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. Memorial Tributes: Volume 3 STUART LAWRENCE BAILEY 4 for the U.S. Department of Commerce as a radio engineer in the Lighthouse Service and Airways Division. In 1929 he went to Panama to install two automatic marine radio beacons, one at the entrance to Cristobal Harbor and the other at Cape Mala, 120 miles south of Balboa. In 1930 his former professor C. M. Jansky contacted him and together they founded Jansky & Bailey, Inc., which pioneered many advances in radio technology over the years. It completed some early work on directional antennas and helped map UHF educational television networks for twenty-one different states. Between 1938 and 1946 the company built and subsequently operated the nation's third—and Washington's first—FM radio station, W3XO, which is WINX-FM. Stuart Bailey was president of Jansky & Bailey, Inc., from 1953 to 1959, when the company was acquired by Atlantic Research Corporation. He continued working for Atlantic Research until 1970, when he retired as the vice-president and general manager of its electronics and communications division. He continued working as a consultant to the firm for the next ten years. Stuart Bailey was an excellent organizer and the leader of numerous engineering projects and investigations. He displayed exceptional leadership and organizational skills during World War II in connection with radio frequency anti-jamming practices. After the war, he was a member of various advisory committees dealing with color television, radio propagation, and telecommunications in general.
Recommended publications
  • Control Engineering for High School Students and Teachers: an Online Platform Development

    Control Engineering for High School Students and Teachers: an Online Platform Development

    Control Engineering for High School Students and Teachers: An Online Platform Development Farhad Farokhi and Iman Shames Contents Report ............................................ 1 1 Introduction . 1 2 Courses . 1 3 Interviews . 2 4 Educational games . 3 5 Remote laboratory . 4 6 Conclusions and future work . 5 Appendix .......................................... 6 A Example course 1: Feedback theory . 6 B Example course 2: Models . 9 C Example course 3: On/off control . 12 D Remote laboratory (RLAB) manual . 13 1 Introduction Based on our teen years and feedback from many of our colleagues and friends, we believe that the control engineering, although being a major building block of automated system in many processes and infrastructures, is a fairly alien subject to the students, parents, and teachers. Therefore, there is a need for introducing feedback control and its application to high school students and their teachers to recruit the next generation of engineers and scientists in this field. We also believe that the academic community has a responsibility to disseminate the information cheaply, if not freely, to a wide range of interested audience, be it students, parents, or teachers, across the globe. This way, we can guarantee that people from different socio- economic backgrounds and in different countries can make informed decisions regarding their careers and those of their friends and families. Motivated by these needs, in this project, we have attempted at developing an online platform for the students and their educators to read about the control engineering, watch lectures by researchers from academia and industry, access interviews with successful people in the control engineering community, and play online games to test their understanding and to possibly learn about the applications of the automatic control.
  • EE C128 Chapter 10

    EE C128 Chapter 10

    Lecture abstract EE C128 / ME C134 – Feedback Control Systems Topics covered in this presentation Lecture – Chapter 10 – Frequency Response Techniques I Advantages of FR techniques over RL I Define FR Alexandre Bayen I Define Bode & Nyquist plots I Relation between poles & zeros to Bode plots (slope, etc.) Department of Electrical Engineering & Computer Science st nd University of California Berkeley I Features of 1 -&2 -order system Bode plots I Define Nyquist criterion I Method of dealing with OL poles & zeros on imaginary axis I Simple method of dealing with OL stable & unstable systems I Determining gain & phase margins from Bode & Nyquist plots I Define static error constants September 10, 2013 I Determining static error constants from Bode & Nyquist plots I Determining TF from experimental FR data Bayen (EECS, UCB) Feedback Control Systems September 10, 2013 1 / 64 Bayen (EECS, UCB) Feedback Control Systems September 10, 2013 2 / 64 10 FR techniques 10.1 Intro Chapter outline 1 10 Frequency response techniques 1 10 Frequency response techniques 10.1 Introduction 10.1 Introduction 10.2 Asymptotic approximations: Bode plots 10.2 Asymptotic approximations: Bode plots 10.3 Introduction to Nyquist criterion 10.3 Introduction to Nyquist criterion 10.4 Sketching the Nyquist diagram 10.4 Sketching the Nyquist diagram 10.5 Stability via the Nyquist diagram 10.5 Stability via the Nyquist diagram 10.6 Gain margin and phase margin via the Nyquist diagram 10.6 Gain margin and phase margin via the Nyquist diagram 10.7 Stability, gain margin, and
  • Book Tribute to George Low –“The Ultimate Engineer”

    Book Tribute to George Low –“The Ultimate Engineer”

    Book Tribute to George Low –“The Ultimate Engineer” The Ultimate Engineer: The Remarkable Life of NASA's Visionary Leader George M. Low by Richard Jurek Foreword by Gerald D. Griffin From the late 1950s to 1976 the U.S. manned spaceflight program advanced as it did largely due to the extraordinary efforts of Austrian immigrant George M. Low. Described as the "ultimate engineer" during his career at NASA, Low was a visionary architect and leader from the agency's inception in 1958 to his retirement in 1976. As chief of manned spaceflight at NASA, Low was instrumental in the Mercury, Gemini, and Apollo programs. Low's pioneering work paved the way for President Kennedy's decision to make a lunar landing NASA's primary goal in the 1960s. After the tragic 1967 Apollo I fire that took the lives of three astronauts and almost crippled the program, Low took charge of the redesign of the Apollo spacecraft, and helped lead the program from disaster and toward the moon. In 1968, Low made the bold decision to go for lunar orbit on Apollo 8 before the lunar module was ready for flight and after only one Earth orbit test flight of the Command and Service modules. Under Low there were five manned missions, including Apollo 11, the first manned lunar landing. Low's clandestine negotiations with the Soviet Union resulted in a historic joint mission in 1975 that was the precursor to the Shuttle-MIR and International Space Station programs. At the end of his NASA career, Low was one of the leading figures in the development of the Space Shuttle in the early1970s, and was instrumental in NASA's transition into a post-Apollo world.
  • Chapter 6.Qxd

    Chapter 6.Qxd

    CHAPTER 6: The NASA Family The melding of all of the NASA centers, contractors, universities, and often strong personalities associated with each of them into the productive and efficient organization necessary to complete NASA’s space missions became both more critical and more difficult as NASA turned its attention from Gemini to Apollo. The approach and style and, indeed, the personality of each NASA center differed sharply. The Manned Spacecraft Center was distinctive among all the rest. Fortune magazine suggested in 1967 that the scale of NASA’s operation required a whole new approach and style of management: “To master such massively complex and expensive problems, the agency has mobilized some 20,000 individual firms, more than 400,000 workers, and 200 colleges and universities in a combine of the most advanced resources of American civilization.” The author referred to some of the eight NASA centers and assorted field installations as “pockets of sovereignty” which exercised an enormous degree of independence and autonomy.1 An enduring part of the management problem throughout the Mercury and Gemini programs that became compounded under Apollo, because of its greater technical challenges, was the diversity and distinctiveness of each of the NASA centers. The diverse cultures and capabilities represented by each of the centers were at once the space program’s greatest resource and its Achilles’ heel. NASA was a hybrid organization. At its heart was Langley Memorial Aeronautical Laboratory established by Congress in 1917 near Hampton, Virginia, and formally dedicated in 1920. It became the Langley Research Center. Langley created the Ames Aeronautical Laboratory at Moffett Field, California, in 1939.
  • Ilia Engineer 1971 16Th Anniversary Issue

    Ilia Engineer 1971 16Th Anniversary Issue

    Vol 17 No 1 Jun Jul _Ilia Engineer 1971 16th Anniversary Issue www.americanradiohistory.com RCA Engineer Staff W. O. Hadlock Editor J. C. Phillips Associate Editor Relax, John Q. Let's talk this over Miss Diane Juchno Editorial Secretary Joan P. Dunn Design and Layout rsary issu priate to Mrs. Julianne Clifton pay tribute to you, the reader -contributor. Supported by your Editorial Representative Subscriptions and the Technical Publications editorial staff, you have made this publication uniq Consulting Editors in its class. Outstanding both in the variety and the quality of its content, the RC Engineer is a major forum for communication among members of the RCA profes- C. A. Meyer Technical Publications Adm., sional community. Electronic Components C. W. Sall Technical Publications Adm., It is appropriate too, in these perplexing times, to give thought to another area of Laboratories communication; one which the RCA Engineer as an internal publication does not ,Strobl Technical Publications Adm. address directly. I refer to the need for each of us in the technical community to Corporate Engineering Services help put the layman at ease with technology so he can make informed decisions about its use. Editorial Advisory Board In recent months this need has been starkly and, in a way, brutally highlighted. The P. A. Beeby VP, Technical Operations. spectacular successes of the space program, which displayed unprecedented tech Systems Development Division, Computer Systems cal virtuosity, drew responses from the public ranging from disbelief to near adulation. Almost simultaneously, engineers and scientists were shocked to find themselves J. J. Brant Staff VP, Industrial Relations-International and their disciplines held responsible for the great social concerns of our time.
  • ACRL News Issue (B) of College & Research Libraries

    ACRL News Issue (B) of College & Research Libraries

    winner receives $150, a certificate, a one-year sub­ cluding tax and land records, population and elec­ scription to the museum’s publication, The Old tion statistics, and period diaries to shape a social Sturbridge Visitor, and a five-year membership to portrait of not one community, but of an entire ge­ the Old Sturbridge Village Research Library Soci­ ographic region. ety. Roth’s book uses a great variety of sources in­ PEOPLE People in the news Committee of NAAL which developed the proce­ dure for the NAAL reimbursement program that Francesca Allegri, formerly head of Informa­ has been successful in promoting the use of library tion Management Education Services at the Uni­ resources throughout the state. Her committee also versity of North Carolina Health Sciences Library, developed the charge to seek funding to improve Chapel Hill, relocated to Champaign, Illinois, in the document delivery network. As a result, NAAL March. She will be teaching, consulting and writ­ will be funded in 1989 to install telefacsimile ing in the areas of user education and information equipment in all general and cooperative libraries. management. She continues as editor of the column, “Information Management Education,” Profiles in Medical Reference Services Quarterly. Annie G. King, library director at Tuskegee In­ Judith Adams, head of the Humanities Depart­ stitute, Alabama, has been awarded the Distin­ ment at the Auburn University Libraries, has been guished Service Award presented by the Alabama appointed director of the Lockwood Library at the Library Association to an individual who has made State University of New a significant contribution toward the development York at Buffalo.
  • Evolving the Oblique Wing

    Evolving the Oblique Wing

    NASA AERONAUTICS BOOK SERIES A I 3 A 1 A 0 2 H D IS R T A O W RY T A Bruce I. Larrimer MANUSCRIP . Bruce I. Larrimer Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Larrimer, Bruce I. Thinking obliquely : Robert T. Jones, the Oblique Wing, NASA's AD-1 Demonstrator, and its legacy / Bruce I. Larrimer. pages cm Includes bibliographical references. 1. Oblique wing airplanes--Research--United States--History--20th century. 2. Research aircraft--United States--History--20th century. 3. United States. National Aeronautics and Space Administration-- History--20th century. 4. Jones, Robert T. (Robert Thomas), 1910- 1999. I. Title. TL673.O23L37 2013 629.134'32--dc23 2013004084 Copyright © 2013 by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. The opinions expressed in this volume are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official positions of the United States Government or of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. This publication is available as a free download at http://www.nasa.gov/ebooks. Introduction v Chapter 1: American Genius: R.T. Jones’s Path to the Oblique Wing .......... ....1 Chapter 2: Evolving the Oblique Wing ............................................................ 41 Chapter 3: Design and Fabrication of the AD-1 Research Aircraft ................75 Chapter 4: Flight Testing and Evaluation of the AD-1 ................................... 101 Chapter 5: Beyond the AD-1: The F-8 Oblique Wing Research Aircraft ....... 143 Chapter 6: Subsequent Oblique-Wing Plans and Proposals ....................... 183 Appendices Appendix 1: Physical Characteristics of the Ames-Dryden AD-1 OWRA 215 Appendix 2: Detailed Description of the Ames-Dryden AD-1 OWRA 217 Appendix 3: Flight Log Summary for the Ames-Dryden AD-1 OWRA 221 Acknowledgments 230 Selected Bibliography 231 About the Author 247 Index 249 iii This time-lapse photograph shows three of the various sweep positions that the AD-1's unique oblique wing could assume.
  • Presidential Files; Folder: 11/22/77; Container 52

    Presidential Files; Folder: 11/22/77; Container 52

    11/22/77 Folder Citation: Collection: Office of Staff Secretary; Series: Presidential Files; Folder: 11/22/77; Container 52 To See Complete Finding Aid: http://www.jimmycarterlibrary.gov/library/findingaids/Staff_Secretary.pdf TIIE PRESIDENT'S SCHEDULE Tuesday - November 22,1977 8:15 Dr. Zbigniew Brz.ezinski The Oval Office . 8:45 .Hr . Frank Moore The Oval Office. 10:00 Medal of Science Awards. (Dr. Frank Press). ·Room 450, EOB. I \ 10:30 Mr. Jody Powell The Oval Office. 11:00 Presentation of Diplomatic Credentials. (Dr. Zbigniew Brzezinski} - The Oval Office. 11:45 Vice President Walter F. Mondale, Admiral Stansfield Turner, and Dr. Zbigniew Brzezinski. The Oval Office. 12:30 Lunch \..,-::_ th Hrs. Rosalynn Carter ·- The Ovctl Office. 2:00 Budget Review Meeting. (Mr. James Mcintyre). ( 2 hrs.) The Cabinet Room. THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON \"~ Date: November 22, 1977 l\ vo\ \'~ MEMORANDUM t)lDifll FOR ACTION: '" FOR INFORMATION: Stu Eizenstat ~t""'"' Frank Moore (Les Francis)~ The Vice President Jack Watson Bob Lipshutz Jim Mcintyre FROM: Rick Hutcheson, Staff Secretary SUBJECT: Adams memo dated 11/22/77 re Response to the Boston Plan and Location of Rail Maintenance Facilit.y in the Northeast Corridor YOUR RESPONSE MUST BE DELIVERED TO THE STAFF SECRETARY BY: TIME: 11:00 AM DAY: Monday DATE: November 28, 1977 ACTION REQUESTED: _x_ Your comments Other: STAFF RESPONSE: __ I concur. __ No comment: Please note other comments below: PLEASE ATTACH THIS COPY TO MATERIAL SUBMITTED. If you have any questions or if you anticipate a delay in submitting the required material, please telephone the Staff Secretary immediately.
  • Supersonic Biplane Design Via Adjoint Method A

    Supersonic Biplane Design Via Adjoint Method A

    SUPERSONIC BIPLANE DESIGN VIA ADJOINT METHOD A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE DEPARTMENT OF AERONAUTICS AND ASTRONAUTICS AND THE COMMITTEE ON GRADUATE STUDIES OF STANFORD UNIVERSITY IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Rui Hu May 2009 c Copyright by Rui Hu 2009 All Rights Reserved ii I certify that I have read this dissertation and that, in my opinion, it is fully adequate in scope and quality as a dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. (Antony Jameson) Principal Adviser I certify that I have read this dissertation and that, in my opinion, it is fully adequate in scope and quality as a dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. (Robert W. MacCormack) I certify that I have read this dissertation and that, in my opinion, it is fully adequate in scope and quality as a dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. (Gianluca Iaccarino) Approved for the University Committee on Graduate Studies. iii Abstract In developing the next generation supersonic transport airplane, two major challenges must be resolved. The fuel efficiency must be significantly improved, and the sonic boom propagating to the ground must be dramatically reduced. Both of these objec- tives can be achieved by reducing the shockwaves formed in supersonic flight. The Busemann biplane is famous for using favorable shockwave interaction to achieve nearly shock-free supersonic flight at its design Mach number. Its performance at off-design Mach numbers, however, can be very poor. This dissertation studies the performance of supersonic biplane airfoils at design and off-design conditions.
  • Wigner's “Unreasonable Effectiveness”

    Wigner's “Unreasonable Effectiveness”

    Wigner’s “Unreasonable Effectiveness” in Context José Ferreirós The Mathematical Intelligencer ISSN 0343-6993 Math Intelligencer DOI 10.1007/s00283-017-9719-9 1 23 Your article is protected by copyright and all rights are held exclusively by Springer Science +Business Media New York. This e-offprint is for personal use only and shall not be self- archived in electronic repositories. If you wish to self-archive your article, please use the accepted manuscript version for posting on your own website. You may further deposit the accepted manuscript version in any repository, provided it is only made publicly available 12 months after official publication or later and provided acknowledgement is given to the original source of publication and a link is inserted to the published article on Springer's website. The link must be accompanied by the following text: "The final publication is available at link.springer.com”. 1 23 Author's personal copy Years Ago Jemma Lorenat, Editor instein famously wrote that the most incomprehen- Wigner’s sible thing about the world is that it is comprehen- EE sible. He was thinking about mathematical and the- oretical physics. The idea is an old one. Nobel prize winner ‘‘Unreasonable Paul Dirac believed that mathematics was an especially well-adapted tool to formulate abstract concepts of any kind, and he also famously insisted that mathematical Effectiveness’’ beauty is a key criterion for physical laws.1 But one of the most famous presentations of that thought was by Dirac’s in Context brother-in-law, Wigner Jen´o´ Pa´l, a.k.a.
  • Nuclear Weapons Technology 101 for Policy Wonks Bruce T

    Nuclear Weapons Technology 101 for Policy Wonks Bruce T

    NUCLEAR WEAPONS TECHNOLOGY FOR POLICY WONKS NUCLEAR WEAPONS TECHNOLOGY 101 FOR POLICY WONKS BRUCE T. GOODWIN BRUCE T. GOODWIN BRUCE T. Center for Global Security Research Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory August 2021 NUCLEAR WEAPONS TECHNOLOGY 101 FOR POLICY WONKS BRUCE T. GOODWIN Center for Global Security Research Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory August 2021 NUCLEAR WEAPONS TECHNOLOGY 101 FOR POLICY WONKS | 1 This work was performed under the auspices of the U.S. Department of Energy by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory in part under Contract W-7405-Eng-48 and in part under Contract DE-AC52-07NA27344. The views and opinions of the author expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States government or Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC. ISBN-978-1-952565-11-3 LCCN-2021907474 LLNL-MI-823628 TID-61681 2 | BRUCE T. GOODWIN Table of Contents About the Author. 2 Introduction . .3 The Revolution in Physics That Led to the Bomb . 4 The Nuclear Arms Race Begins. 6 Fission and Fusion are "Natural" Processes . 7 The Basics of the Operation of Nuclear Explosives. 8 The Atom . .9 Isotopes . .9 Half-life . 10 Fission . 10 Chain Reaction . 11 Critical Mass . 11 Fusion . 14 Types of Nuclear Weapons . 16 Finally, How Nuclear Weapons Work . 19 Fission Explosives . 19 Fusion Explosives . 22 Staged Thermonuclear Explosives: the H-bomb . 23 The Modern, Miniature Hydrogen Bomb . 25 Intrinsically Safe Nuclear Weapons . 32 Underground Testing . 35 The End of Nuclear Testing and the Advent of Science-Based Stockpile Stewardship . 39 Stockpile Stewardship Today . 41 Appendix 1: The Nuclear Weapons Complex .
  • President Harry S Truman's Office Files, 1945–1953

    President Harry S Truman's Office Files, 1945–1953

    A Guide to the Microfilm Edition of RESEARCH COLLECTIONS IN AMERICAN POLITICS Microforms from Major Archival and Manuscript Collections General Editor: William E. Leuchtenburg PRESIDENT HARRY S TRUMAN’S OFFICE FILES, 1945–1953 Part 2: Correspondence File UNIVERSITY PUBLICATIONS OF AMERICA A Guide to the Microfilm Edition of RESEARCH COLLECTIONS IN AMERICAN POLITICS Microforms from Major Archival and Manuscript Collections General Editor: William E. Leuchtenburg PRESIDENT HARRY S TRUMAN’S OFFICE FILES, 1945–1953 Part 2: Correspondence File Project Coordinators Gary Hoag Paul Kesaris Robert E. Lester Guide compiled by David W. Loving A microfilm project of UNIVERSITY PUBLICATIONS OF AMERICA An Imprint of CIS 4520 East-West Highway • Bethesda, Maryland 20814-3389 LCCN: 90-956100 Copyright© 1989 by University Publications of America. All rights reserved. ISBN 1-55655-151-7. TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction ............................................................................................................................ v Scope and Content Note ....................................................................................................... xi Source and Editorial Note ..................................................................................................... xiii Reel Index Reel 1 A–Atomic Energy Control Commission, United Nations ......................................... 1 Reel 2 Attlee, Clement R.–Benton, William ........................................................................ 2 Reel 3 Bowles, Chester–Chronological