DOCSLIB.ORG

University of Catania

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

UNIVERSITY OF CATANIA DEPARTMENT OF AGRI-FOOD AND ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS MANAGEMENT INTERNATIONAL PhD PROGRAM IN PLANT HEALTH TECHNOLOGIES AND PROTECTION OF AGRO-ECOSYSTEMS CYCLE XXVI 2010-2013 DEVID GUASTELLA Title of the Thesis: Studies on Whiteflies Living on Herbaceous Plants and Their Parasitoids in Tropical and Sub-Tropical Environment through Combined Morphological, Molecular and Geostatistical Approaches PhD Coordinator: TUTOR Prof. Carmelo Rapisarda Prof. Carmelo Rapisarda CO-TUTOR: Dr. James P. Legg 1 CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ..................................................................................................................... 7 ABSTRACT ............................................................................................................................................. 8 LIST OF FIGURES ............................................................................................................................... 12 LIST OF TABLES ................................................................................................................................ 15 CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................... 17 1.1 WHITEFLIES ............................................................................................................................ 17 1.1.1 GENERALITIES ............................................................................................................................................ 17 1.1.2 ECONOMIC IMPORTANCE .......................................................................................................................... 20 1.1.3 EVOLUTION OF WHITEFLIES: AN OVERVIEW ........................................................................................ 24 1.1.4 ZOOGEOGRAPHY ......................................................................................................................................... 26 1.1.5 SUBFAMILY ALEURODICINAE ................................................................................................................... 26 1.1.6 SUBFAMILY ALEYRODINAE ....................................................................................................................... 28 1.1.7 THE SPREAD OF WHITEFLIES AROUND THE WORLD ............................................................................ 32 1.2 PARASITOIDS .......................................................................................................................... 33 1.2.1 GENERAL NOTES ......................................................................................................................................... 33 1.2.2 ROLE OF PARASITOIDS IN BIOLOGICAL CONTROL OF WHITEFLIES .................................................... 37 1.3 MOLECULAR TAXONOMY .................................................................................................... 42 1.3.1 RIBOSOMIAL RNA ..................................................................................................................................... 43 1.3.2 MITOCHONDRIAL DNA ............................................................................................................................. 45 1.3.3 DNA BARCODING ...................................................................................................................................... 46 1.4 BIOINFORMATICS .................................................................................................................. 47 1.4.1 DATA MANAGEMENT ................................................................................................................................. 47 2 1.4.2 AVAILABLE “OPEN/FREE” TOOLS .......................................................................................................... 48 1.4.3 MODELS AND METHODS IN PHYLOGENETIC STUDY ............................................................................. 52 1.4.3.1 Summary of the activity on how to select the correct method ...................................... 58 1.5 GIS AND GEO-STATISTICS ................................................................................................... 61 1.5.1 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................... 61 1.5.2 WHITEFLIES AND GIS ............................................................................................................................... 62 1.5.3 SPATIAL ANALYSIS OF INSECT DIVERSITY AND DISTRIBUTION .......................................................... 64 1.5.4 ASSESSMENT OF A SPECIES COMPLEX ALONG AN ALTITUDINAL GRADIENT .................................... 65 1.5.5 MODELLING THE POTENTIAL INSECT DISTRIBUTION .......................................................................... 66 CHAPTER 2: AIM AND OUTLINE OF THIS THESIS .................................................................. 69 CHAPTER 3: MATHERIALS AND METHODS .............................................................................. 72 3.1 FIELD SURVEY: EXPLORATION FOR WHITEFLIES AND THEIR NATURAL ENEMIES .............................................................................................................................................. 72 3.1.1 SURVEY METHODOLOGY ........................................................................................................................... 72 3.1.2 STUDY AREAS ............................................................................................................................................. 74 3.1.2.1 Mediterranean environment (Sicily) ........................................................................................ 74 3.1.2.2 Tropical environment (Tanzania) .............................................................................................. 78 3.2 TAXONOMY: MORPHOLOGICAL IDENTIFICATION ...................................................... 85 3.2.1 ALEYRODIDAE ............................................................................................................................................. 85 3.2.2 APHELINIDAE .............................................................................................................................................. 87 3.3 MOLECULAR METHODS IN INSECT TAXONOMY ........................................................... 91 3.3.1 WHITEFLIES (THE BEMISIA TABACI SPECIES COMPLEX) .................................................................... 91 3.3.2 PARASITOIDS .............................................................................................................................................. 92 3.4 DATA MANAGEMENT ............................................................................................................ 95 3.5 GIS AND GEOSTATISTICS ..................................................................................................... 97 3 3.5.1.1 Additional Statistical Analysis ..................................................................................................... 99 CHAPTER 4: RESULTS ................................................................................................................... 100 4.1 WHITEFLIES AND THEIR PARASITOIDS ON HERBACEOUS PLANTS IN MEDITERRANEAN ENVIRONMENT ........................................................................................... 100 4.1.1 INTRODUCTORY NOTES .......................................................................................................................... 100 4.1.2 WHITEFLIES ............................................................................................................................................. 102 4.1.2.1 Identification of the collected material ................................................................................. 102 4.1.2.2 Species richness and abundance ............................................................................................. 106 4.1.3 MODELLING THE POTENTIAL DISTRIBUTION OF WHITEFLY PESTS ................................................ 110 4.1.4 PARASITOIDS ........................................................................................................................................... 112 4.1.4.1 Who was parasitizing whom? ................................................................................................... 112 4.1.4.2 Reserve selection of whitefly parasitoids ............................................................................ 113 4.1.5 DISCUSSION .............................................................................................................................................. 116 4.1.5.1 Whiteflies ........................................................................................................................................... 116 4.1.5.2 Parasitoids ......................................................................................................................................... 117 4.2 WHITEFLIES AND THEIR PARASITOIDS ON HERBACEOUS PLANTS IN TROPICAL ENVIRONMENT ................................................................................................................................ 120 4.2.1 INTRODUCTORY NOTES .......................................................................................................................... 120 4.2.2 WHITEFLIES ............................................................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Effects of Host Plants, Temperature Regimes, and Mating Scenarios on the Population Dynamics of the Cabbage Whitefly Aleyrodes Proletella L

    Effects of Host Plants, Temperature Regimes, and Mating Scenarios on the Population Dynamics of the Cabbage Whitefly Aleyrodes Proletella L

    Effects of host plants, temperature regimes, and mating scenarios on the population dynamics of the cabbage whitefly Aleyrodes proletella L. (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) Dissertation zur Erlangung des Doktorgrades der Fakultät für Agrarwissenschaften der Georg-August-Universität Göttingen vorgelegt von Khaldon Askoul geboren in Swaida (Syrien) Göttingen, April 2017 _______________________________________________________ ____________ D 7 1. Referentin/Referent: Prof. Dr. Stefan Vidal 2. Korreferentin/Korreferent: Dr. Rainer Meyhöfer Tag der mündlichen Prüfung: 20.06.2017 Für meine Familie Table of contents Table of contents Summary ................................................................................................................................. 1 General introduction .............................................................................................................. 4 Objective ................................................................................................................................. 9 Chapter 1 .............................................................................................................................. 10 Life history parameters of Aleyrodes proletella L. (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) on different host plants ............................................................................................................................ 10 Chapter 2 .............................................................................................................................. 11 Effects
  • Whitefly by Officers of the Entomology Branch, Department of Agriculture Western Australia

    Whitefly by Officers of the Entomology Branch, Department of Agriculture Western Australia

    No. 05 April 2004 Whitefly By officers of the Entomology Branch, Department of Agriculture Western Australia 'Whiteflies' or 'snow flies' (Aleyrodidae) are tiny, sap- Which whiteflies occur in Western sucking insects often found on the underside of leaves. Australia? They are related to other sucking insects such as aphids, mealybugs and scale insects, and tend to fly when the Five important species of whitefly occur in Western plant is disturbed. Whitefly adults resemble small moths Australia, as listed in the table below. With the and the body and wings are covered in a powdery white exception of the citrus whitefly and the native strain of wax. Nymphs (or larvae) are a flattened oval shape, and Bemisia tabaci, which are native to Australia, all have look more like a scale insect. been introduced. Species such as the greenhouse and silverleaf whitefly cause significant damage to Damage commercial crops both here and overseas. Whiteflies produce a sticky substance known as Identification of whiteflies is extremely difficult since most honeydew, on which sooty mould can develop. Low whitefly adults appear similar in colour (most are white to off-white), size (1.5–2.5 mm) and shape (moth-like). numbers of whiteflies are not usually damaging and The pupal stage has most of the characteristics used to adults by themselves will not cause significant damage identify whiteflies and is the only stage from which an unless they are transmitting plant viruses. Virus accurate species identification can be made. symptoms include irregular ripening in tomatoes and blanching in carrots and broccoli. When present in large numbers, whitefly feeding can affect plant growth causing distortion, discoloration, yellowing or silvering of leaves.
  • Y Su Parasitoide Encarsia Inaron (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae) En Morelos, México

    Y Su Parasitoide Encarsia Inaron (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae) En Morelos, México

    ISSN 0065-1737 Acta Zoológica MexicanaActa Zool. (n.s.), Mex. 27(3): (n.s.) 879-882 27(3) (2011) Nota Científica (Short Communication) PRIMER REGISTRO DE SIPHONINUS PHILLYREAE (HEMIPTERA: ALEYRODIDAE) Y SU PARASITOIDE ENCARSIA INARON (HYMENOPTERA: APHELINIDAE) EN MORELOS, MÉXICO Myartseva, S. N. & C. Lázaro-Castellanos. 2011. First record of Siphoninus phillyreae (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) and its parasitoid Encarsia inaron (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae) in Morelos, Mexico. Acta Zoológica Mexicana (n. s.), 27(3): 879-882. ABSTRACT. This is the first record of the ash whitefly Siphoninus phillyreae (Haliday, 1835) and its parasitoid Encarsia inaron (Walker, 1839) on Fraxinus sp. in Morelos, Mexico. Las moscas blancas (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) son insectos fitófagos de gran impor- tancia que atacan una amplia diversidad de cultivos, plantas ornamentales y árboles de sombra como el fresno (Fraxinus sp.), el cual es plantado por gobiernos locales en las calles de las ciudades formando parte del paisaje urbano. Las moscas blancas se han estudiado durante muchos años por su importancia económica y biológica, se ali- mentan en las hojas y ovipositan en el tejido foliar donde existen otros competidores, además de ser un área frecuentada por enemigos naturales (Gerling 2002). Los afelí- nidos (Hymenoptera) son efectivos agentes de control biológico de moscas blancas e insectos escama (Williams 1996), donde muchas de las especies del género Encarsia son parasitoides primarios de Aleyrodidae y Diaspididae (Hemiptera) (Polaszek et al. 1999, Manzari et al. 2002). El 1º marzo de 2010, se colectaron hojas de fresno con adultos y pupas de mosca blanca en la ciudad de Cuernavaca, Morelos, las cuales fueron trasladadas al labora- torio del primer autor en la Facultad de Agronomía de la Universidad Autónoma de Tamaulipas, y colocadas en cajas Petri para esperar la emergencia de parasitoides.
  • Identified Difficulties and Conditions for Field Success of Biocontrol

    Identified Difficulties and Conditions for Field Success of Biocontrol

    Identified difficulties and conditions for field success of biocontrol. 4. Socio-economic aspects: market analysis and outlook Bernard Blum, Philippe C. Nicot, Jürgen Köhl, Michelina Ruocco To cite this version: Bernard Blum, Philippe C. Nicot, Jürgen Köhl, Michelina Ruocco. Identified difficulties and conditions for field success of biocontrol. 4. Socio-economic aspects: market analysis and outlook. Classical and augmentative biological control against diseases and pests: critical status analysis and review of factors influencing their success, IOBC - International Organisation for Biological and Integrated Controlof Noxious Animals and Plants, 2011, 978-92-9067-243-2. hal-02809583 HAL Id: hal-02809583 https://hal.inrae.fr/hal-02809583 Submitted on 6 Jun 2020 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. WPRS International Organisation for Biological and Integrated Control of Noxious IOBC Animals and Plants: West Palaearctic Regional Section SROP Organisation Internationale de Lutte Biologique et Integrée contre les Animaux et les OILB Plantes Nuisibles:
  • 1.6 Parasitoids of Giant Whitefly

    1.6 Parasitoids of Giant Whitefly

    UC Riverside UC Riverside Electronic Theses and Dissertations Title Life Histories and Host Interaction Dynamics of Parasitoids Used for Biological Control of Giant Whitefly (Aleurodicus dugesii) Cockerell (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/8020w7rd Author Schoeller, Erich Nicholas Publication Date 2018 Peer reviewed|Thesis/dissertation eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA RIVERSIDE Life Histories and Host Interaction Dynamics of Parasitoids Used for Biological Control of Giant Whitefly (Aleurodicus dugesii) Cockerell (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) A Dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Entomology by Erich Nicholas Schoeller March 2018 Dissertation Committee: Dr. Richard Redak, Chairperson Dr. Timothy Paine. Dr. Matthew Daugherty Copyright by Erich Nicholas Schoeller 2018 The Dissertation of Erich Nicholas Schoeller is approved: Committee Chairperson University of California, Riverside Acknowledgements This dissertation was made possible with the kind support and help of many individuals. I would like to thank my advisors Drs. Richard Redak, Timothy Paine, and Matthew Daugherty for their wisdom and guidance. Their insightful comments and questions helped me become a better scientist and facilitated the development of quality research. I would particularly like to thank Dr. Redak for his endless patience and unwavering support throughout my degree. I wish to also thank Tom Prentice and Rebeccah Waterworth for their support and companionship. Their presence in the Redak Lab made my time there much more enjoyable. I would like to thank all of the property owners who kindly allowed me to work on their lands over the years, as well as the many undergraduate interns who helped me collect and analyze data from the experiments in this dissertation.
  • Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 240 / Thursday, December 14, 1995 / Notices

    Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 240 / Thursday, December 14, 1995 / Notices

    64140 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 240 / Thursday, December 14, 1995 / Notices In accordance with applicable into the environment of the organisms relevant literature, provide the public regulations, APHIS has received listed below after concluding that their with documentation of APHIS' review applications for permits for the release release in accordance with conditions and analysis of the environmental into the environment of nonindigenous on the permits will not present a risk of impact and plant pest risk associated biological control agents. In the course the introduction or dissemination of with releasing the biological control of reviewing each permit application, plant pests within the United States and agents into the environment. APHIS assessed the plant pest risk will not have a significant impact on the Environmental assessments and posed by each organism and the impact quality of the human environment. The findings of no significant impact have on the environment of releasing each environmental assessments and findings been prepared by APHIS relative to the organism under the conditions of no significant impact, which are issuance of permits for the release into described in the permit application. based on data submitted by the the environment of the following APHIS has issued permits for the release applicant and on a review of other biological control agents: Date of find- ing of no Organism Title of environmental assessment significant impact Cirrospilus quadristriatus (Subba Rao and ``Field Release of a Nonindigenous Wasp (Cirrospilus quadristriatus (Subba Rao and 7/25/94. Ramamani). Ramamani)) for Biological Control of Citrus Leafminer (Phyllocnistis citrella Stainton)'' (July 1994). Anaphes nitens (Girault) ............................
  • Biosecurity Risk Assessment

    Biosecurity Risk Assessment

    An Invasive Risk Assessment Framework for New Animal and Plant-based Production Industries RIRDC Publication No. 11/141 RIRDCInnovation for rural Australia An Invasive Risk Assessment Framework for New Animal and Plant-based Production Industries by Dr Robert C Keogh February 2012 RIRDC Publication No. 11/141 RIRDC Project No. PRJ-007347 © 2012 Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation. All rights reserved. ISBN 978-1-74254-320-8 ISSN 1440-6845 An Invasive Risk Assessment Framework for New Animal and Plant-based Production Industries Publication No. 11/141 Project No. PRJ-007347 The information contained in this publication is intended for general use to assist public knowledge and discussion and to help improve the development of sustainable regions. You must not rely on any information contained in this publication without taking specialist advice relevant to your particular circumstances. While reasonable care has been taken in preparing this publication to ensure that information is true and correct, the Commonwealth of Australia gives no assurance as to the accuracy of any information in this publication. The Commonwealth of Australia, the Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation (RIRDC), the authors or contributors expressly disclaim, to the maximum extent permitted by law, all responsibility and liability to any person, arising directly or indirectly from any act or omission, or for any consequences of any such act or omission, made in reliance on the contents of this publication, whether or not caused by any negligence on the part of the Commonwealth of Australia, RIRDC, the authors or contributors. The Commonwealth of Australia does not necessarily endorse the views in this publication.
  • Biological Control of Ash Whitefly

    Biological Control of Ash Whitefly

    usually precipitate the quarantine and shipping restrictions associated with such insect pests as Mediterranean fruit fly. Furthermore, tools typically employed for early detection of low insect population densities, such as pheromone or bait traps, are not available for whiteflies, and newly introduced whiteflies are often wide- spread before they are discovered. Conse- quently, modern strategies for managing populations of exotic whitefly pests typi- cally center around biological control rather than eradication. The history of Siphoninus phillyreae (Haliday)in North America typifies many introduced whiteflies. Siphoninus phillyreae is an Old World species, reported in the Eastern Hemisphere from Morocco to In- dia, and from Ireland to Central Africa. Its discovery in California was the first re- corded in the Western Hemisphere. In the absence of effective natural enemies in California, this whitefly subsequently de- veloped extensive, damaging populations. Siphoninus phillyreae whitefly develops continuously, although more slowly dur- ing cooler (winter) temperatures, complet- ing several generations each year. In heavily infested areas populations rapidly occupy undersides of all leaves on suscep- tible trees. Nymphal populations on trees cause premature dehiscence of leaves and defoliation, severely reduce yield in fruit trees and, in some cases, cause the death of young pear trees following repeated defo- liation. Honeydew produced by whiteflies falls on sidewalks, lawns and automobiles, and is carried by air currents and foot traf- fic into homes, causing sticky furniture, draperies and carpets. It further serves as a medium for sooty molds, which discolor any surface affected by the honeydew, in- cluding fruit intended for market. Adult populations reach astounding levels, limit- ing outdoor activity in many areas.
  • (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae) Parasitic on Whiteflies (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae) in North America

    (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae) Parasitic on Whiteflies (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae) in North America

    A Pictorial Guide to the species of Encarsia (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae) parasitic on whiteflies (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae) in North America. Michael E. Schauff and Gregory A. Evans. (MES) Systematic Entomology Laboratory, PSI, USDA, c/o National Museum of Natural History, NHB 168, Washington, D.C. 20560. (GAE) Department of Nematology and Entomology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611 KEY To Enter the Pictorial Key click here Abstract.-- The 27 species of Encarsia (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae) occuring in North America (including Mexico) and attacking whiteflies (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae) are treated. Each species is keyed and illustrated. A separate diagnosis, list of hosts, and summary of distribution are provided. Keywords: Biological Control, Aphelinidae, Aleyrodidae, Encarsia, parasite. 2 Various species of whiteflies (Aleyrodidae) are among the most serious of agricultural pests, causing millions of dollars of damage each year to various crops. In 1991, one species (Bemisia argentfolii Bellows and Perring) caused damage in excess of $500 million in the U.S. alone (Perring, et al., 1993). Among the most common and effective parasitoids of whiteflies are parasitic wasps in the genus Encarsia (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae). These tiny wasps are primary parasites of whitefly species as well as species of scale insects (Coccoidea). Worldwide, over 170 Encarsia species have been described (Hayat, 1989). In spite of their abundance and usefulness, there are still very few well illustrated keys and diagnoses, and in North America, no recent identification aids exist. Because of their small size, identification of the various species is difficult under even the best of circumstances and requires the intervention of a specialist in aphelinid taxonomy. In this paper, we treat the 27 species of Encarsia known to occur in North America that are parasitic on whiteflies.
  • Encarsia Catalog of World Species

    Encarsia Catalog of World Species

    Last updated: August 2020 Notes on catalog: This catalog was produced using Biological and Systematic Information System (BASIS 3.0a developed by Gary Gibson and Jennifer Read (ECORC, Agriculture Canada Ottawa). This catalog of Encarsia is in development and no information presented herein regarding name changes should be considered as valid until properly published. If errors are discovered, please contact the primary author at [email protected]. Production of this catalog has been supported in part by National Science Foundation Grant DEB 1257733 and 1555808, University of California, van den Bosch Scholarship, and hatch project funds. Catalog of the Encarsia Förster of the World Robert L. Kresslein, John Heraty, James Woolley and Andrew Polaszek * Other Hosts: Aphelinidae, Aphididae, Cicadellidae, Coccidae, Plataspidae, Platygastridae, Pseudococcidae, Pyralidae Encarsia of the World — Contents _____________________________________________________________________________________________ Contents Encarsia Förster ............................................................................................................................................. 1 Unplaced Species............................................................................................................................................ 2 Albiscutellum Species Group ...................................................................................................................... 18 Aurantii Species Group ..............................................................................................................................
  • Ash Whitefly, Siphoninus Phillyreae

    Ash Whitefly, Siphoninus Phillyreae

    DACS-P-01744 Pest Alert created 15-September-2010 Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, Division of Plant Industry Charles H. Bronson, Commissioner of Agriculture Ash Whitefly, Siphoninus phillyreae (Haliday), a New Exotic Whitefly (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) in Central Florida, and Encarsia inaron, its parasitoid (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae) Ian C. Stocks, [email protected], Biological Scientist IV, Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, Division of Plant Industry Greg Hodges, [email protected], Bureau Chief - Entomology, Nematology and Plant Pathology, Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, Division of Plant Industry INTRODUCTION: In May 2010, Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, Division of Plant Industry (FDACS-DPI) staff were alerted to the possible presence of ash whitefly at Lake Buena Vista (Fig. 1). A subsequent inspection of containerized pomegranate trees (Punica granatum) revealed a moderate infestation of the ash whitefly on several trees. In early September 2010, DPI Entomologist Dr. Susan Halbert collected specimens from a pomegranate at a private residence in Panama City, Florida. This species had not previously been collected in Florida, although concern of its possible introduction and impact prompted DPI staff in 1990 to prepare an entomology circular (No. 337) and fact sheet (EENY-147) that presented photographs, a description and a discussion of its biology and potential agricultural and horticultural impact (http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/pdffiles/IN/IN30400.pdf). Ash whitefly was first detected in the continental United States California in LosAngeles County, California, in 1988, and was later found in Nevada, New Mexico and Arizona. An extensive infestation of ash whitefly on Bradford pears (Pyrus calleryana) was found in Raleigh, North Carolina in 1993 (Hackney et al., 1997), and it has been reported from Texas, South Carolina and Georgia (McDonald et al., 1996).
  • Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team

    Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team

    Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER Hemlock Woolly Adelgid FOURTH SYMPO S IUM ON HEMLOCK WOOLLY ADELGID IN THE Eas TERN UNITED ST A TE S HA RT F ORD , CONNECTICUT FEBRU A RY 12-14, 2008 Brad Onken and Richard Reardon, Compilers Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team—Morgantown, West Virginia FHTET-2008-01 U.S. Department Forest Service June 2008 of Agriculture Most of the abstracts were submitted in an electronic form, and were edited to achieve a uniform format and typeface. Each contributor is responsible for the accuracy and content of his or her own paper. Statements of the contributors from outside of the U.S. Department of Agriculture may not necessarily reflect the policy of the Department. Some participants did not submit abstracts, and so their presentations are not represented here. The use of trade, firm, or corporation names in this publication is for the information and convenience of the reader. Such use does not constitute an official endorsement or approval by the U.S. Department of Agriculture of any product or service to the exclusion of others that may be suitable. References to pesticides appear in some technical papers represented by these abstracts. Publication of these statements does not constitute endorsement or recommendation of them by the conference sponsors, nor does it imply that uses discussed have been registered. Use of most pesticides is regulated by state and federal laws. Applicable regulations must be obtained from the appropriate regulatory agency prior to their use. CAUTION: Pesticides can be injurious to humans, domestic animals, desirable plants, and fish and other wildlife if they are not handled and applied properly.