Biological Control of Ash Whitefly

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Biological Control of Ash Whitefly usually precipitate the quarantine and shipping restrictions associated with such insect pests as Mediterranean fruit fly. Furthermore, tools typically employed for early detection of low insect population densities, such as pheromone or bait traps, are not available for whiteflies, and newly introduced whiteflies are often wide- spread before they are discovered. Conse- quently, modern strategies for managing populations of exotic whitefly pests typi- cally center around biological control rather than eradication. The history of Siphoninus phillyreae (Haliday)in North America typifies many introduced whiteflies. Siphoninus phillyreae is an Old World species, reported in the Eastern Hemisphere from Morocco to In- dia, and from Ireland to Central Africa. Its discovery in California was the first re- corded in the Western Hemisphere. In the absence of effective natural enemies in California, this whitefly subsequently de- veloped extensive, damaging populations. Siphoninus phillyreae whitefly develops continuously, although more slowly dur- ing cooler (winter) temperatures, complet- ing several generations each year. In heavily infested areas populations rapidly occupy undersides of all leaves on suscep- tible trees. Nymphal populations on trees cause premature dehiscence of leaves and defoliation, severely reduce yield in fruit trees and, in some cases, cause the death of young pear trees following repeated defo- liation. Honeydew produced by whiteflies falls on sidewalks, lawns and automobiles, and is carried by air currents and foot traf- fic into homes, causing sticky furniture, draperies and carpets. It further serves as a medium for sooty molds, which discolor any surface affected by the honeydew, in- cluding fruit intended for market. Adult populations reach astounding levels, limit- ing outdoor activity in many areas. Princi- Biological control pally affected are ornamental shade trees as well as pomegranate, apple, pear, citrus and, to a lesser degree, stone fruits. Infes- of ash whitefly: tations affect not only agricultural produc- tion but also dramatically affect the quality a success in progress of life in urban communities. The biological control program em- ployed exemplifies the approaches suit- Tom S. Bellows P Timothy D. Paine o Juli R. Gould able for limiting the impact of many pests Larry G. Bezark P Joe C. Ball* introduced in urban and agricultural set- tings. These approaches include (1)detec- Two natural enemies of ash white- Exotic whiteflies have long threatened tion of the pest and mounting of a biologi- fly (Siphoninus phillyreae), jntro- California’s farms and gardens. At least cal control program, (2)foreign explora- eight species are established in the state; tion and introduction of exotic natural duced into California in 1990, several more recognized pest species exist continued on p. 27 proved effective in Southern Cali- in other Western Hemisphere areas and in fornia field trials, completely con- regions bordering the Pa’cific Basin. trollina this Dest in ‘release sites Damage to plants is typically related to within-z4 mbnths, Evaluations in large populations feeding-on leaves and to production of large quantities of honey- release sites in Central and North- dew, Because typically do not ern California, Arizona and Nevada infest fruits, the presence of a particular look equally promising. species in & agkultural regiin does not 24 CALIFORNIA AGRICULTURE, VOLUME 46, NUMBER 1 continued from p. 24 enemies, (3) evaluation of natural enemy potential and (4)regionwide distribution of natural enemies. The problem Siphoninus phillyreae was first identified in California in Los Angeles in August 1988. The infestation was widespread in Los Angeles, Orange and San Bemardino counties, and high densities in some areas indicated that the infestation had existed for one or two seasons before 1988. The in- festation spread rapidly, and now this whitefly is found in nearly every county in California; infestations are also reported in Nevada, Arizona and New Mexico. Fol- lowing meetings with agricultural com- missioners and state agricultural officials in January and February 1990, initial fund- ing for establishing a biological control creased production of adult whiteflies, Larval (above)and adult (below)forms of the ladybird beetle Clitosfefhus arcuafus, an ash program at the University of California densities of 5. phillyreae, which had been whitefly predator. was secured from UC funds, agricultural increasing in the absence of E. partenopea, commodity boards, county boards of su- began to decline. By October 1990, the pervisors, and the California Department density of 5. phillyreae had been reduced of Food and Agriculture (CDFA). 13-fold.Densities of S. phillyreae continued to drop in 1991, and by September 1991, Natural enemies found, introduced whitefly densities were between 3 and 4 During 1989 and 1990, T. Bellows, (UC orders of magnitude or 1,000 to 10,000 Riverside), L. Bezark (CDFA) and D. times lower than they had been at the Gerling (University of Tel Aviv) intro- peak in 1990 (fig. 1).Emergence of E. duced nine populations of natural enemies partenopea continued to constitute 80 to into UC Riverside quarantine facilities. 98% of the total emergence of whiteflies Three populations reproduced in quaran- and parasites from 5. phillyreae nymphs. tine: the tiny parasitic wasp Encarsia Densities of 5. phillyreae were so low in purtenopeu from Italy, E. partenopea from Is- 1991 that the whitefly is now difficult to rael, and the predaceous ladybird beetle find in Riverside and in most other parts Clitostethus arcuatus from Israel. Initial of Southern California. The wasp was dis- shipments were received in late summer tributed in summer 1990 in several loca- matic regions throughout infested por- 1989 and, following clearance through tions in Los Angeles, San Bernardino, Riv- tions of the state. Releases were made in quarantine protocols, the first releases of erside, Orange and San Diego counties, Alameda, Fresno, Kern, Los Angeles, Sac- wasps from Israel were made in October and results in these locations were similar ramento, Santa Barbara, Stanislaus, Tulare, 1989; first recoveries were made approxi- to those obtained in Riverside. Ventura and Yolo counties during Sep- mately 6 weeks later. The beetle was re- tember and October 1990; subsequent re- leased first in spring 1990 in coastal San Regionwide evaluation leases were made beginning in June 1991. Diego County where it, too, became estab- The wasp E. partenopea and the beetle The parasite became established in all lished. Early results from the wasp re- C. arcuatus from Israel were distributed in counties (fig. 21, but establishment of the leases were encouraging, and during the several whitefly-infested areas in 1990 to beetle was less uniform. Populations be- winter, colonies of the wasp from Israel evaluate the overwintering ability and came established following releases in were.developed and expanded. subsequent level of biological control Hayward (on San Francisco Bay), achieved by these natural enemies in cli- Modesto, Fresno, Davis and Ventura, but Initial research: parasitic wasp not in Pleasanton, Bakersfield or Ojai. Experiments were conducted in River- More research will reveal whether the side in summer 1990 to assess the effect of beetle will eventually establish in these lo- E. partenopea on populations of S. cations. phillyreae. At sites where parasites were re- During 1991, a few city governments leased in May, densities of the whitefl7 re- contracted UC to distribute and evaluate mained below 8 immature insects/cm the natural enemies in their areas, and this (52/in2).In contrast, whiteflies were in- work was conducted in cooperation with creasing in density during early summer local Cooperative Extension personnel. In at nonrelease sites. Nonrelease sites did 30May 7Sept 23Aug 1 Dec addition, during 5 weeks in summer 1991, 1990 1991 not remain free of parasites for long, how- Date more than 100,000 wasps were distributed ever, even though they were up to 11 km to public agencies and private individuals, Fig. 1. Changes in density of immature ash (7 miles) from release sites. Once the para- whitefly (Siphoninus phillyreae) and percent- primarily in Southern California and, in site entered a population, the percentage age of whitefly pupae producing parasitic smaller numbers, to locations as far north of whitefly nymphs producing E. wasps (Encarsiaparfenopea) rather than adult as Yolo County. partenopea, rather than adult whiteflies, whiteflies on pomegranate in Riverside, 1990- Releases of E. purtenopeu had substantial rapidly increased (fig. 1). As a result of de- 1991. impacts on the populations of 5. phillyreae CALIFORNIA AGRICULTURE, JANUARY-FEBRUARY 1992 27 70% covered by all whitefly stages. How- by UC and state and federal resources to ever, on August 2, an average of 408 para- maintain the personnel and facilities nec- sites were counted in a similar sampling essary to conduct such programs. Facilities period on leaves in Modesto. Only 40% of such as the quarantine laboratory and the the leaves contained whitefly life stages. Department of Entomology at UC River- The adult population of parasites was 10- side are critical to maintaining biological fold larger and the level of damage was al- control programs. most 60% lower in Modesto, which ini- Furthermore, there were substantial tially released a larger number of natural commitment and assistance from col- enemies, began releases at an earlier date leagues
Recommended publications
  • Whitefly by Officers of the Entomology Branch, Department of Agriculture Western Australia
    No. 05 April 2004 Whitefly By officers of the Entomology Branch, Department of Agriculture Western Australia 'Whiteflies' or 'snow flies' (Aleyrodidae) are tiny, sap- Which whiteflies occur in Western sucking insects often found on the underside of leaves. Australia? They are related to other sucking insects such as aphids, mealybugs and scale insects, and tend to fly when the Five important species of whitefly occur in Western plant is disturbed. Whitefly adults resemble small moths Australia, as listed in the table below. With the and the body and wings are covered in a powdery white exception of the citrus whitefly and the native strain of wax. Nymphs (or larvae) are a flattened oval shape, and Bemisia tabaci, which are native to Australia, all have look more like a scale insect. been introduced. Species such as the greenhouse and silverleaf whitefly cause significant damage to Damage commercial crops both here and overseas. Whiteflies produce a sticky substance known as Identification of whiteflies is extremely difficult since most honeydew, on which sooty mould can develop. Low whitefly adults appear similar in colour (most are white to off-white), size (1.5–2.5 mm) and shape (moth-like). numbers of whiteflies are not usually damaging and The pupal stage has most of the characteristics used to adults by themselves will not cause significant damage identify whiteflies and is the only stage from which an unless they are transmitting plant viruses. Virus accurate species identification can be made. symptoms include irregular ripening in tomatoes and blanching in carrots and broccoli. When present in large numbers, whitefly feeding can affect plant growth causing distortion, discoloration, yellowing or silvering of leaves.
    [Show full text]
  • Identified Difficulties and Conditions for Field Success of Biocontrol
    Identified difficulties and conditions for field success of biocontrol. 4. Socio-economic aspects: market analysis and outlook Bernard Blum, Philippe C. Nicot, Jürgen Köhl, Michelina Ruocco To cite this version: Bernard Blum, Philippe C. Nicot, Jürgen Köhl, Michelina Ruocco. Identified difficulties and conditions for field success of biocontrol. 4. Socio-economic aspects: market analysis and outlook. Classical and augmentative biological control against diseases and pests: critical status analysis and review of factors influencing their success, IOBC - International Organisation for Biological and Integrated Controlof Noxious Animals and Plants, 2011, 978-92-9067-243-2. hal-02809583 HAL Id: hal-02809583 https://hal.inrae.fr/hal-02809583 Submitted on 6 Jun 2020 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. WPRS International Organisation for Biological and Integrated Control of Noxious IOBC Animals and Plants: West Palaearctic Regional Section SROP Organisation Internationale de Lutte Biologique et Integrée contre les Animaux et les OILB Plantes Nuisibles:
    [Show full text]
  • 1.6 Parasitoids of Giant Whitefly
    UC Riverside UC Riverside Electronic Theses and Dissertations Title Life Histories and Host Interaction Dynamics of Parasitoids Used for Biological Control of Giant Whitefly (Aleurodicus dugesii) Cockerell (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/8020w7rd Author Schoeller, Erich Nicholas Publication Date 2018 Peer reviewed|Thesis/dissertation eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA RIVERSIDE Life Histories and Host Interaction Dynamics of Parasitoids Used for Biological Control of Giant Whitefly (Aleurodicus dugesii) Cockerell (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) A Dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Entomology by Erich Nicholas Schoeller March 2018 Dissertation Committee: Dr. Richard Redak, Chairperson Dr. Timothy Paine. Dr. Matthew Daugherty Copyright by Erich Nicholas Schoeller 2018 The Dissertation of Erich Nicholas Schoeller is approved: Committee Chairperson University of California, Riverside Acknowledgements This dissertation was made possible with the kind support and help of many individuals. I would like to thank my advisors Drs. Richard Redak, Timothy Paine, and Matthew Daugherty for their wisdom and guidance. Their insightful comments and questions helped me become a better scientist and facilitated the development of quality research. I would particularly like to thank Dr. Redak for his endless patience and unwavering support throughout my degree. I wish to also thank Tom Prentice and Rebeccah Waterworth for their support and companionship. Their presence in the Redak Lab made my time there much more enjoyable. I would like to thank all of the property owners who kindly allowed me to work on their lands over the years, as well as the many undergraduate interns who helped me collect and analyze data from the experiments in this dissertation.
    [Show full text]
  • Biosecurity Risk Assessment
    An Invasive Risk Assessment Framework for New Animal and Plant-based Production Industries RIRDC Publication No. 11/141 RIRDCInnovation for rural Australia An Invasive Risk Assessment Framework for New Animal and Plant-based Production Industries by Dr Robert C Keogh February 2012 RIRDC Publication No. 11/141 RIRDC Project No. PRJ-007347 © 2012 Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation. All rights reserved. ISBN 978-1-74254-320-8 ISSN 1440-6845 An Invasive Risk Assessment Framework for New Animal and Plant-based Production Industries Publication No. 11/141 Project No. PRJ-007347 The information contained in this publication is intended for general use to assist public knowledge and discussion and to help improve the development of sustainable regions. You must not rely on any information contained in this publication without taking specialist advice relevant to your particular circumstances. While reasonable care has been taken in preparing this publication to ensure that information is true and correct, the Commonwealth of Australia gives no assurance as to the accuracy of any information in this publication. The Commonwealth of Australia, the Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation (RIRDC), the authors or contributors expressly disclaim, to the maximum extent permitted by law, all responsibility and liability to any person, arising directly or indirectly from any act or omission, or for any consequences of any such act or omission, made in reliance on the contents of this publication, whether or not caused by any negligence on the part of the Commonwealth of Australia, RIRDC, the authors or contributors. The Commonwealth of Australia does not necessarily endorse the views in this publication.
    [Show full text]
  • Ash Whitefly, Siphoninus Phillyreae
    DACS-P-01744 Pest Alert created 15-September-2010 Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, Division of Plant Industry Charles H. Bronson, Commissioner of Agriculture Ash Whitefly, Siphoninus phillyreae (Haliday), a New Exotic Whitefly (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) in Central Florida, and Encarsia inaron, its parasitoid (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae) Ian C. Stocks, [email protected], Biological Scientist IV, Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, Division of Plant Industry Greg Hodges, [email protected], Bureau Chief - Entomology, Nematology and Plant Pathology, Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, Division of Plant Industry INTRODUCTION: In May 2010, Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, Division of Plant Industry (FDACS-DPI) staff were alerted to the possible presence of ash whitefly at Lake Buena Vista (Fig. 1). A subsequent inspection of containerized pomegranate trees (Punica granatum) revealed a moderate infestation of the ash whitefly on several trees. In early September 2010, DPI Entomologist Dr. Susan Halbert collected specimens from a pomegranate at a private residence in Panama City, Florida. This species had not previously been collected in Florida, although concern of its possible introduction and impact prompted DPI staff in 1990 to prepare an entomology circular (No. 337) and fact sheet (EENY-147) that presented photographs, a description and a discussion of its biology and potential agricultural and horticultural impact (http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/pdffiles/IN/IN30400.pdf). Ash whitefly was first detected in the continental United States California in LosAngeles County, California, in 1988, and was later found in Nevada, New Mexico and Arizona. An extensive infestation of ash whitefly on Bradford pears (Pyrus calleryana) was found in Raleigh, North Carolina in 1993 (Hackney et al., 1997), and it has been reported from Texas, South Carolina and Georgia (McDonald et al., 1996).
    [Show full text]
  • Biocontrol of the Pomegranate Whitefly, Siphoninus Phillyreae (Hemiptera
    Egypt. J. Plant Prot. Res. Inst. (2018), 1(1): 51-57 Egyptian Journal of Plant Protection Research Institute www.ejppri.eg.net Biocontrol of the pomegranate whitefly, Siphoninus phillyreae (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) by augmentation, releasing and evaluation of Eretmocerus parasiphonini (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae) in Egypt Shaaban Abd-Rabou Scale insects and mealybugs Research Department , Plant Protection Research Institute, Agricultural Research Center , Egypt ARTICLE INFO Abstract: Article History The pomegranate whitefly, Siphoninus phillyreae Received: 15/3/2018 (Haliday) (Hemiptera : Aleyrodidae) is one of the most Accepted: 1/7/2018 important pests infested pomegranate in Egypt. The aim of this ________________ work was to evaluate the biological control potential of the Keywords parasitoid, Eretmocerus parasiphonini Evans and Abd-Rabou Parasitic hymenoptera, (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae) against the pomegranate whitefly, pomegranate whitefly, Siphoninus phillyreae (Haliday) (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) on biological control and pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) by mass rearing and Eretmocerus augmentative releases of this parasitoid during 2011-2014 in parasiphonini. Egypt. This parasitoid species were mass reared and monthly releases were made in the fields of pomegranate during each of three consecutive years (2011-2014). About 142578 E. parasiphonini individuals were released in fields in Assuit, Daqahylia and Giza governorates in Egypt on pomegranate which were naturally infested by S. phillyreae. Populations of the parasitoid and parasitism were much higher in field plots where releases were made as compared with where no releases were made. The maximum rate of parasitism reached 48.9, 42.1 and 46.7 % in Assuit, Daqahylia and Giza governorates, respectively in the field treatment where releases were made, while parasitism peaked at 2.6, 4.6 and 2.5% in Assuit, Daqahylia and Giza governorates, respectively where no releases were made.
    [Show full text]
  • Ash Whitefly, Siphoninus Phillyreae
    FDACS-P-01744 Pest Alert created 15-September-2010 Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, Division of Plant Industry Charles H. Bronson, Commissioner of Agriculture Ash Whitefly, Siphoninus phillyreae (Haliday), a New Exotic Whitefly (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) in Central Florida, and Encarsia inaron, its parasitoid (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae) Ian C. Stocks, [email protected], Biological Scientist IV, Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, Division of Plant Industry Greg Hodges, [email protected], Bureau Chief - Entomology, Nematology and Plant Pathology, Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, Division of Plant Industry INTRODUCTION: In May 2010, Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, Division of Plant Industry (FDACS-DPI) staff were alerted to the possible presence of ash whitefly at Lake Buena Vista (Fig. 1). A subsequent inspection of containerized pomegranate trees (Punica granatum) revealed a moderate infestation of the ash whitefly on several trees. In early September 2010, DPI Entomologist Dr. Susan Halbert collected specimens from a pomegranate at a private residence in Panama City, Florida. This species had not previously been collected in Florida, although concern of its possible introduction and impact prompted DPI staff in 1990 to prepare an entomology circular (No. 337) and fact sheet (EENY-147) that presented photographs, a description and a discussion of its biology and potential agricultural and horticultural impact (http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/pdffiles/IN/IN30400.pdf). Ash whitefly was first detected in the continental United States California in LosAngeles County, California, in 1988, and was later found in Nevada, New Mexico and Arizona. An extensive infestation of ash whitefly on Bradford pears (Pyrus calleryana) was found in Raleigh, North Carolina in 1993 (Hackney et al., 1997), and it has been reported from Texas, South Carolina and Georgia (McDonald et al., 1996).
    [Show full text]
  • A Cost/Benefit Analysis of the Ash Whitefly Biological Control Program in California by Karen Jetter, Dr
    Agricultural and Resource Economics Update A Cost/Benefit Analysis of the Ash Whitefly Biological Control Program in California by Karen Jetter, Dr. Karen Klonsky, and Dr. Charles H. Pickett revious research has shown that healthy street (UCR) obtained a small stingless parasitic wasp, trees significantly contribute to the aesthetic Encarsia inaron (= partenopea) from researchers in Israel beauty of our urban areas. Not surprisingly, and Italy. The wasp was reared in CDFA and UCR Ppeople will demand pest control to protect the aesthetic greenhouses and released throughout neighborhoods beauty of street trees with levels of defoliation as small in California starting in 1990. Two years after the as 5%. Therefore, the preservation of a tree’s aesthetic parasite was released, ash whitefly densities were beauty by controlling pest infestations can result in reduced to numbers difficult to detect even with substantial benefits to the community. In addition, rigorous monitoring efforts. Since 1992, no further healthy trees contribute significantly to property releases of the parasitic wasp have been made and ash values, whereas defoliated trees cause property values whitefly populations remain at undetectable levels. to decrease. The control of the ash whitefly resulted in the The ash whitefly, Siphoninus phillyreae, was first preservation of the aesthetic beauty of ash and identified in Los Angeles County during the summer ornamental pear trees in urban landscapes. This article of 1988. By 1990, it had spread throughout much of estimates the economic benefits and costs of preserving California and caused severe defoliation to its primary the aesthetic beauty of urban street trees from the ash hosts, ash (Fraxinus species) and ornamental pear (Pyrus whitefly biological control program.
    [Show full text]
  • ISSN 1387-3547, Volume 12, Number 9
    ISSN 1387-3547, Volume 12, Number 9 This article was published in the above mentioned Springer issue. The material, including all portions thereof, is protected by copyright; all rights are held exclusively by Springer Science + Business Media. The material is for personal use only; commercial use is not permitted. Unauthorized reproduction, transfer and/or use may be a violation of criminal as well as civil law. Biol Invasions (2010) 12:3237–3248 Author's personal copy DOI 10.1007/s10530-010-9718-7 ORIGINAL PAPER Assessing the biosecurity risk from pathogens and herbivores to indigenous plants: lessons from weed biological control Nicholas Martin • Quentin Paynter Received: 9 September 2009 / Accepted: 29 January 2010 / Published online: 20 February 2010 Ó Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010 Abstract Some potentially invasive herbivores/ suite of existing natural enemies. The costs of pathogens in their home range may attack plants conducting a risk assessment of a herbivore/pathogen originating from another geographic area. Methods in another country that damages plants indigenous to are required to assess the risk these herbivores/ another geographic area means that criteria will be pathogens pose to these plants in their indigenous needed for deciding which foreign herbivore/patho- ecosystems. The processes and criteria used by weed gen species should be assessed. These criteria could biological control researchers to assess the impact of include the threat classification of the plant, the potential biological control agents on a plant species amount of damage to the particular plant organs in its non-native range provide a possible frame- affected, and the importance in key ecosystems.
    [Show full text]
  • 20123382938.Pdf
    Plant Pest Risk Analysis Concepts and Application This page intentionally left blank Plant Pest Risk Analysis Concepts and Application Edited by Christina Devorshak CABI is a trading name of CAB International CABI CABI Nosworthy Way 38 Chauncey Street Wallingford Suite 1002 Oxfordshire OX10 8DE Boston, MA 02111 UK USA Tel: +44 (0)1491 832111 Tel: +1 800 552 3083 (toll free) Fax: +44 (0)1491 833508 Tel: +1 (0)617 395 4051 E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.cabi.org © CAB International 2012. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced in any form or by any means, electronically, mechanically, by photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the copyright owners. A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library, London, UK. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Plant pest risk analysis : concepts and application / C. Devorshak, ed. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-1-78064-036-5 (alk. paper) 1. Plants, Protection of. 2. Risk assessment. 3. Insect pests--Control. 4. Agricultural pests--Control. I. Devorshak, Christina, 1969- SB950.P55 2012 628.9'6--dc23 2012025556 ISBN-13: 978 1 78064 03 5 Commissioning editor: Rachel Cutts Editorial assistant: Chris Shire Production editor: Simon Hill Typeset by SPi, Pondicherry, India. Printed and bound in the UK by CPI Group (UK) Ltd, Croydon, CR0 4YY. Contents Contributors vii Acknowledgements ix PART I: PEST RISK ANALYSIS BACKGROUND AND HISTORY 1. Introduction 3 2. Basic Concepts in Risk Analysis 7 3. History of Plant Quarantine and the Use of Risk Analysis 19 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Sticky Cotton: Causes
    United States Department of Agriculture Sticky Cotton: Causes, Agricultural Research Effects, and Prevention Service Technical Bulletin Number 1915 June 2007 United States Department of Agriculture Sticky Cotton: Causes, Agricultural Research Effects, and Prevention Service Technical E. Hequet, T.J. Henneberry, and R.L. Nichols Bulletin Number 1915 June 2007 Hequet is Associate Director, International Textile Center, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX. Henneberry was Laboratory Director and Research Leader, Western Cotton Research Laboratory, USDA, Agricultural Research Service, Phoenix, AZ; he is currently Director, U.S. Arid Land Research Center, USDA, Agricultural Research Service, Maricopa, AZ. Nichols is Director, Agricultural Research, Cotton Incorporated, Cary, NC. Abstract Mention of trade names, commercial products, or companies in this publication is solely for the Hequet, E., T.J. Henneberry, and R.L. Nichols, eds. purpose of providing specific information and does 2007. Sticky Cotton: Causes, Effects, and Prevention. not imply recommendation or endorsement by the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research U.S. Department of Agriculture over others not Service. Technical Bulletin 1915. recommended. Adherence of contaminants and lint to cotton This publication reports research involving pesticides. It processing equipment is called “stickiness,” and the does not contain recommendations for their use nor does contaminated lint is “sticky cotton.” Sticky cotton is a it imply that uses discussed here have been registered. worldwide problem, increasing as cotton processing All uses of pesticides must be registered by appropriate machinery is refined because high-speed, large-volume State or Federal agencies or both before they can be processing of lint requires cleaner cotton. Honeydew, recommended. the sugar-containing excretions of certain insects, mainly whiteflies and aphids, are the most frequent While supplies last, single copies of this publication can cause of sticky cotton.
    [Show full text]
  • Entomologia Hellenica
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by National Documentation Centre - EKT journals ENTOMOLOGIA HELLENICA Vol. 21, 2012 First record of Siphoninus phillyreae on pomegranate in Greece Tsagkarakis Antonios Laboratory of Agricultural Zoology and Entomology, Agricultural University of Athens, 75 Iera Odos, GR - 118 55 Athens, Greece https://doi.org/10.12681/eh.11516 Copyright © 2017 Antonios E. Tsagkarakis To cite this article: Tsagkarakis, A. (2012). First record of Siphoninus phillyreae on pomegranate in Greece. ENTOMOLOGIA HELLENICA, 21(1), 39-43. doi:https://doi.org/10.12681/eh.11516 http://epublishing.ekt.gr | e-Publisher: EKT | Downloaded at 20/02/2020 22:40:29 | ENTOMOLOGIA HELLENICA 21 (2012): 39-43 SHORT COMMUNICATION First record of Siphoninus phillyreae on pomegranate in Greece ANTONIOS E. TSAGKARAKIS Laboratory of Agricultural Zoology and Entomology, Agricultural University of Athens, 75 Iera Odos, GR - 118 55 Athens, Greece; e-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT On June 2012, the ash whitefly Siphoninus phillyreae (Haliday) (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) was recorded for the first time on pomegranate in Greece. Its occurrence was observed in a pomegranate orchard at Kato Tithorea, in Fthiotida. Information on its morphology, biology and distribution is presented. KEY WORDS: Aleyrodidae, ash whitefly, first record. Pomegranate is one of the oldest fruit (Coleoptera: Buprestidae) and the woolly species cultivated in Greece, known since whitefly, Aleurothrixus floccosus the prehistoric years. The main cultivation (Hemiprera: Aleyrodidae) (Drogoudi et al. places were mainly the Aegean islands 2012). (Chios, Lesvos, Samos, Rhodos, Kalymnos, The aim of the present study was to Kos), Crete, Peloponnese (Argos, Astros), report the first record of the ash whitefly, Central Greece (Lamia) and Macedonia Siphoninus phillyreae (Haliday) (Hemiptera: (Veria, Edessa, Pella) (Pontikis 1987).
    [Show full text]