ISSN 1387-3547, Volume 12, Number 9

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

ISSN 1387-3547, Volume 12, Number 9 ISSN 1387-3547, Volume 12, Number 9 This article was published in the above mentioned Springer issue. The material, including all portions thereof, is protected by copyright; all rights are held exclusively by Springer Science + Business Media. The material is for personal use only; commercial use is not permitted. Unauthorized reproduction, transfer and/or use may be a violation of criminal as well as civil law. Biol Invasions (2010) 12:3237–3248 Author's personal copy DOI 10.1007/s10530-010-9718-7 ORIGINAL PAPER Assessing the biosecurity risk from pathogens and herbivores to indigenous plants: lessons from weed biological control Nicholas Martin • Quentin Paynter Received: 9 September 2009 / Accepted: 29 January 2010 / Published online: 20 February 2010 Ó Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010 Abstract Some potentially invasive herbivores/ suite of existing natural enemies. The costs of pathogens in their home range may attack plants conducting a risk assessment of a herbivore/pathogen originating from another geographic area. Methods in another country that damages plants indigenous to are required to assess the risk these herbivores/ another geographic area means that criteria will be pathogens pose to these plants in their indigenous needed for deciding which foreign herbivore/patho- ecosystems. The processes and criteria used by weed gen species should be assessed. These criteria could biological control researchers to assess the impact of include the threat classification of the plant, the potential biological control agents on a plant species amount of damage to the particular plant organs in its non-native range provide a possible frame- affected, and the importance in key ecosystems. work for assessing risks to indigenous plants. While there are similarities between these criteria such as Keywords Indigenous plants Á Natural ecosystems Á the need for clear objectives, studies in the native Insect herbivores Á Mite herbivores Á range of the herbivore/pathogen, good knowledge of Plant pathogens Á Invasive species the ecology of the target plant and taxonomy of the plant and herbivore/pathogen, and modelling of the interaction between the two organisms, there are some important differences in approach. These Introduction include the need to consider the threat classification of the plant, the likely greater risk from polyphagous Plant pathogens or herbivores entering and establish- herbivores/pathogens than oligophagous or monoph- ing in another country/geographic area may attack agous species, and the need to consider the impact of indigenous plants as well as cultivated and natura- an additional natural enemy in conjunction with a lised plants. In the past governments have been primarily concerned about protecting cultivated and beneficial naturalised plants from new pests through a N. Martin (&) variety of biosecurity measures taken at various New Zealand Institute for Plant & Food Research Limited, Private Bag 92 169, Auckland Mail Centre, points on the pathways followed by at risk goods. Auckland 1142, New Zealand These measures include inspection of imported e-mail: [email protected] produce and plants before shipment and/or at point of entry, quarantine of live plants before or after Q. Paynter Landcare Research, Private Bag 92 170, Auckland Mail entry, and mandatory physical or chemical treatments Centre, Auckland 1142, New Zealand of plants and produce before or after entry into the 123 3238 Author's personal copy N. Martin, Q. Paynter importing country (Sumner 2003). The types of plants home range and even less information about treatments reflect the perceived risks and the path- what the impact of herbivores and pathogens living ways followed by the goods. Today, many countries other geographic areas may have on indigenous are equally concerned to protect their indigenous plants in their home range. One potential source of plants from pests, indeed the International Plant information about these herbivores and pathogens is Protection Convention (IPPC), hosted by the Food to document those found on indigenous plants living and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations outside their indigenous geographic area. A New (FAO), has recently re-interpreted its mandate to Zealand government-funded research project ‘‘Using include the protection of plants in natural as well as expatriate New Zealand flora as predictors of threats agricultural systems (Waage and Mumford 2008; to NZ natural ecosystems’’ (www.b3nz.org/public/ IPPC 2005). natural_ecosystems.php) that was part of the Better To protect indigenous plants from herbivores and Border Biosecurity (B3) programme, aimed to iden- pathogens from different geographic areas, biosecu- tify foreign herbivores and pathogens that may be rity authorities must identify high risk pathways by harmful to New Zealand indigenous plants in natural which these organisms may enter the country and to ecosystems. It did this through a survey of literature put in place measures to reduce the risk of entry and examination of New Zealand plants growing in through these pathways. This requires knowledge of other countries by New Zealand researchers visiting the biology of the organisms in their current geo- plant collections in these countries or by arranging graphic areas and an assessment of the likelihood that for researchers living in other countries to examine they will establish in the new geographic area. For these plants and report on diseases and pests. There crops, there are lists, often extensive, of the kinds of was relatively little information about herbivores and diseases and pests that can attack them, e.g. Crop pathogens in other countries that could attack plants Protection Compendium (2004), and for many of endemic to New Zealand, though there is more these pests there is often substantial information about information in the literature about non-endemic their biology, and potential damage they may cause to indigenous plants (those present naturally in New crop plants. There are standardised procedures for Zealand and other countries) (Plant-SyNZ database assessing these risks to crop plants and for identifying 2009). In summary, the Plant-SyNZ database con- pathways into the country (e.g., Anonymous 2006). tains information on 51 herbivores that are not in These procedures include hazard identification, New Zealand and that could live on 25 species of assessing the likelihood of entry, the likelihood of New Zealand indigenous plants. Nine species of plant establishment and the consequences of establishment. are listed as endemic (19 host associations) and 16 These procedures are time consuming and may involve species of non-endemic indigenous plants are listed preliminary hazard identification and prioritisation. In (40 host associations). some countries such as New Zealand, part of the Having identified herbivores and pathogens in standard procedure includes an assessment of the risk other geographic areas that live on indigenous plants of crop diseases and pests to indigenous plants. An in the target area, the next step is to determine the risk organism that may be a threat to indigenous plants that these pathogens and herbivores pose to the requires information about the impact of the herbi- indigenous flora, especially in their indigenous eco- vore/pathogen to the plant species in a geographic systems. Some herbivores and pathogens from other area where the herbivore/pathogen are present and an geographic areas will already be living in the target assessment of the consequences of establishment of geographic area and some will be living on indige- the herbivore/pathogen in the new geographic area for nous plants (e.g. Table 1). The extent of their threat it to be classified as a potential hazard. If the risk is to indigenous plants can be assessed in situ. In perceived to be high, then a full risk assessment is contrast, for herbivores/pathogens that are not present undertaken which includes pathway analysis and in the target geographic area, information about the identification of steps to reduce the likelihood of severity of their impact on indigenous plants and their entry and establishment (Anonymous 2006). possible impact on indigenous ecosystems must be There is relatively little information about the gathered in other geographic areas where these susceptibility of indigenous plants to crop pests in the herbivores/pathogens live. However, if a foreign 123 Assessing the biosecurity risk from pathogens Author's and herbivores personal copy 3239 Table 1 Summary of adventive herbivores present in New Zealand and found on New Zealand indigenous plants (Plant-SyNZ database Plant-SyNZ database 2009) Herbivore group Number of species Number of indigenous host plant associations Endemic plants Non-endemic plants Total Acari 6 12 3 15 Coleoptera 22 29 14 43 Diptera 6 7 10 17 Hemiptera: Coccoidea 26 195 46 241 Hemiptera: other 50 142 44 186 Isoptera 1 1 0 1 Lepidoptera 12 14 11 25 Thysanoptera 4 30 10 40 Mollusca: Gastropoda 1 2 0 2 Total species/associations 128 452 143 595 herbivore/pathogen is found to cause severe damage biological control agents for weeds and compare the to a plant growing in a non-indigenous geographic processes for herbivores and pathogens. This paper area, can it be assumed that the herbivore/pathogen considers herbivores and pathogens together as both will cause equally severe damage to the plant in the kinds of organism threaten indigenous plants in their plants native ecosystem? indigenous ecosystems. Research reported
Recommended publications
  • Whitefly by Officers of the Entomology Branch, Department of Agriculture Western Australia
    No. 05 April 2004 Whitefly By officers of the Entomology Branch, Department of Agriculture Western Australia 'Whiteflies' or 'snow flies' (Aleyrodidae) are tiny, sap- Which whiteflies occur in Western sucking insects often found on the underside of leaves. Australia? They are related to other sucking insects such as aphids, mealybugs and scale insects, and tend to fly when the Five important species of whitefly occur in Western plant is disturbed. Whitefly adults resemble small moths Australia, as listed in the table below. With the and the body and wings are covered in a powdery white exception of the citrus whitefly and the native strain of wax. Nymphs (or larvae) are a flattened oval shape, and Bemisia tabaci, which are native to Australia, all have look more like a scale insect. been introduced. Species such as the greenhouse and silverleaf whitefly cause significant damage to Damage commercial crops both here and overseas. Whiteflies produce a sticky substance known as Identification of whiteflies is extremely difficult since most honeydew, on which sooty mould can develop. Low whitefly adults appear similar in colour (most are white to off-white), size (1.5–2.5 mm) and shape (moth-like). numbers of whiteflies are not usually damaging and The pupal stage has most of the characteristics used to adults by themselves will not cause significant damage identify whiteflies and is the only stage from which an unless they are transmitting plant viruses. Virus accurate species identification can be made. symptoms include irregular ripening in tomatoes and blanching in carrots and broccoli. When present in large numbers, whitefly feeding can affect plant growth causing distortion, discoloration, yellowing or silvering of leaves.
    [Show full text]
  • Identified Difficulties and Conditions for Field Success of Biocontrol
    Identified difficulties and conditions for field success of biocontrol. 4. Socio-economic aspects: market analysis and outlook Bernard Blum, Philippe C. Nicot, Jürgen Köhl, Michelina Ruocco To cite this version: Bernard Blum, Philippe C. Nicot, Jürgen Köhl, Michelina Ruocco. Identified difficulties and conditions for field success of biocontrol. 4. Socio-economic aspects: market analysis and outlook. Classical and augmentative biological control against diseases and pests: critical status analysis and review of factors influencing their success, IOBC - International Organisation for Biological and Integrated Controlof Noxious Animals and Plants, 2011, 978-92-9067-243-2. hal-02809583 HAL Id: hal-02809583 https://hal.inrae.fr/hal-02809583 Submitted on 6 Jun 2020 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. WPRS International Organisation for Biological and Integrated Control of Noxious IOBC Animals and Plants: West Palaearctic Regional Section SROP Organisation Internationale de Lutte Biologique et Integrée contre les Animaux et les OILB Plantes Nuisibles:
    [Show full text]
  • 1.6 Parasitoids of Giant Whitefly
    UC Riverside UC Riverside Electronic Theses and Dissertations Title Life Histories and Host Interaction Dynamics of Parasitoids Used for Biological Control of Giant Whitefly (Aleurodicus dugesii) Cockerell (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/8020w7rd Author Schoeller, Erich Nicholas Publication Date 2018 Peer reviewed|Thesis/dissertation eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA RIVERSIDE Life Histories and Host Interaction Dynamics of Parasitoids Used for Biological Control of Giant Whitefly (Aleurodicus dugesii) Cockerell (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) A Dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Entomology by Erich Nicholas Schoeller March 2018 Dissertation Committee: Dr. Richard Redak, Chairperson Dr. Timothy Paine. Dr. Matthew Daugherty Copyright by Erich Nicholas Schoeller 2018 The Dissertation of Erich Nicholas Schoeller is approved: Committee Chairperson University of California, Riverside Acknowledgements This dissertation was made possible with the kind support and help of many individuals. I would like to thank my advisors Drs. Richard Redak, Timothy Paine, and Matthew Daugherty for their wisdom and guidance. Their insightful comments and questions helped me become a better scientist and facilitated the development of quality research. I would particularly like to thank Dr. Redak for his endless patience and unwavering support throughout my degree. I wish to also thank Tom Prentice and Rebeccah Waterworth for their support and companionship. Their presence in the Redak Lab made my time there much more enjoyable. I would like to thank all of the property owners who kindly allowed me to work on their lands over the years, as well as the many undergraduate interns who helped me collect and analyze data from the experiments in this dissertation.
    [Show full text]
  • Biosecurity Risk Assessment
    An Invasive Risk Assessment Framework for New Animal and Plant-based Production Industries RIRDC Publication No. 11/141 RIRDCInnovation for rural Australia An Invasive Risk Assessment Framework for New Animal and Plant-based Production Industries by Dr Robert C Keogh February 2012 RIRDC Publication No. 11/141 RIRDC Project No. PRJ-007347 © 2012 Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation. All rights reserved. ISBN 978-1-74254-320-8 ISSN 1440-6845 An Invasive Risk Assessment Framework for New Animal and Plant-based Production Industries Publication No. 11/141 Project No. PRJ-007347 The information contained in this publication is intended for general use to assist public knowledge and discussion and to help improve the development of sustainable regions. You must not rely on any information contained in this publication without taking specialist advice relevant to your particular circumstances. While reasonable care has been taken in preparing this publication to ensure that information is true and correct, the Commonwealth of Australia gives no assurance as to the accuracy of any information in this publication. The Commonwealth of Australia, the Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation (RIRDC), the authors or contributors expressly disclaim, to the maximum extent permitted by law, all responsibility and liability to any person, arising directly or indirectly from any act or omission, or for any consequences of any such act or omission, made in reliance on the contents of this publication, whether or not caused by any negligence on the part of the Commonwealth of Australia, RIRDC, the authors or contributors. The Commonwealth of Australia does not necessarily endorse the views in this publication.
    [Show full text]
  • Biological Control of Ash Whitefly
    usually precipitate the quarantine and shipping restrictions associated with such insect pests as Mediterranean fruit fly. Furthermore, tools typically employed for early detection of low insect population densities, such as pheromone or bait traps, are not available for whiteflies, and newly introduced whiteflies are often wide- spread before they are discovered. Conse- quently, modern strategies for managing populations of exotic whitefly pests typi- cally center around biological control rather than eradication. The history of Siphoninus phillyreae (Haliday)in North America typifies many introduced whiteflies. Siphoninus phillyreae is an Old World species, reported in the Eastern Hemisphere from Morocco to In- dia, and from Ireland to Central Africa. Its discovery in California was the first re- corded in the Western Hemisphere. In the absence of effective natural enemies in California, this whitefly subsequently de- veloped extensive, damaging populations. Siphoninus phillyreae whitefly develops continuously, although more slowly dur- ing cooler (winter) temperatures, complet- ing several generations each year. In heavily infested areas populations rapidly occupy undersides of all leaves on suscep- tible trees. Nymphal populations on trees cause premature dehiscence of leaves and defoliation, severely reduce yield in fruit trees and, in some cases, cause the death of young pear trees following repeated defo- liation. Honeydew produced by whiteflies falls on sidewalks, lawns and automobiles, and is carried by air currents and foot traf- fic into homes, causing sticky furniture, draperies and carpets. It further serves as a medium for sooty molds, which discolor any surface affected by the honeydew, in- cluding fruit intended for market. Adult populations reach astounding levels, limit- ing outdoor activity in many areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Ash Whitefly, Siphoninus Phillyreae
    DACS-P-01744 Pest Alert created 15-September-2010 Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, Division of Plant Industry Charles H. Bronson, Commissioner of Agriculture Ash Whitefly, Siphoninus phillyreae (Haliday), a New Exotic Whitefly (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) in Central Florida, and Encarsia inaron, its parasitoid (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae) Ian C. Stocks, [email protected], Biological Scientist IV, Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, Division of Plant Industry Greg Hodges, [email protected], Bureau Chief - Entomology, Nematology and Plant Pathology, Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, Division of Plant Industry INTRODUCTION: In May 2010, Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, Division of Plant Industry (FDACS-DPI) staff were alerted to the possible presence of ash whitefly at Lake Buena Vista (Fig. 1). A subsequent inspection of containerized pomegranate trees (Punica granatum) revealed a moderate infestation of the ash whitefly on several trees. In early September 2010, DPI Entomologist Dr. Susan Halbert collected specimens from a pomegranate at a private residence in Panama City, Florida. This species had not previously been collected in Florida, although concern of its possible introduction and impact prompted DPI staff in 1990 to prepare an entomology circular (No. 337) and fact sheet (EENY-147) that presented photographs, a description and a discussion of its biology and potential agricultural and horticultural impact (http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/pdffiles/IN/IN30400.pdf). Ash whitefly was first detected in the continental United States California in LosAngeles County, California, in 1988, and was later found in Nevada, New Mexico and Arizona. An extensive infestation of ash whitefly on Bradford pears (Pyrus calleryana) was found in Raleigh, North Carolina in 1993 (Hackney et al., 1997), and it has been reported from Texas, South Carolina and Georgia (McDonald et al., 1996).
    [Show full text]
  • Biocontrol of the Pomegranate Whitefly, Siphoninus Phillyreae (Hemiptera
    Egypt. J. Plant Prot. Res. Inst. (2018), 1(1): 51-57 Egyptian Journal of Plant Protection Research Institute www.ejppri.eg.net Biocontrol of the pomegranate whitefly, Siphoninus phillyreae (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) by augmentation, releasing and evaluation of Eretmocerus parasiphonini (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae) in Egypt Shaaban Abd-Rabou Scale insects and mealybugs Research Department , Plant Protection Research Institute, Agricultural Research Center , Egypt ARTICLE INFO Abstract: Article History The pomegranate whitefly, Siphoninus phillyreae Received: 15/3/2018 (Haliday) (Hemiptera : Aleyrodidae) is one of the most Accepted: 1/7/2018 important pests infested pomegranate in Egypt. The aim of this ________________ work was to evaluate the biological control potential of the Keywords parasitoid, Eretmocerus parasiphonini Evans and Abd-Rabou Parasitic hymenoptera, (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae) against the pomegranate whitefly, pomegranate whitefly, Siphoninus phillyreae (Haliday) (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) on biological control and pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) by mass rearing and Eretmocerus augmentative releases of this parasitoid during 2011-2014 in parasiphonini. Egypt. This parasitoid species were mass reared and monthly releases were made in the fields of pomegranate during each of three consecutive years (2011-2014). About 142578 E. parasiphonini individuals were released in fields in Assuit, Daqahylia and Giza governorates in Egypt on pomegranate which were naturally infested by S. phillyreae. Populations of the parasitoid and parasitism were much higher in field plots where releases were made as compared with where no releases were made. The maximum rate of parasitism reached 48.9, 42.1 and 46.7 % in Assuit, Daqahylia and Giza governorates, respectively in the field treatment where releases were made, while parasitism peaked at 2.6, 4.6 and 2.5% in Assuit, Daqahylia and Giza governorates, respectively where no releases were made.
    [Show full text]
  • Ash Whitefly, Siphoninus Phillyreae
    FDACS-P-01744 Pest Alert created 15-September-2010 Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, Division of Plant Industry Charles H. Bronson, Commissioner of Agriculture Ash Whitefly, Siphoninus phillyreae (Haliday), a New Exotic Whitefly (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) in Central Florida, and Encarsia inaron, its parasitoid (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae) Ian C. Stocks, [email protected], Biological Scientist IV, Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, Division of Plant Industry Greg Hodges, [email protected], Bureau Chief - Entomology, Nematology and Plant Pathology, Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, Division of Plant Industry INTRODUCTION: In May 2010, Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, Division of Plant Industry (FDACS-DPI) staff were alerted to the possible presence of ash whitefly at Lake Buena Vista (Fig. 1). A subsequent inspection of containerized pomegranate trees (Punica granatum) revealed a moderate infestation of the ash whitefly on several trees. In early September 2010, DPI Entomologist Dr. Susan Halbert collected specimens from a pomegranate at a private residence in Panama City, Florida. This species had not previously been collected in Florida, although concern of its possible introduction and impact prompted DPI staff in 1990 to prepare an entomology circular (No. 337) and fact sheet (EENY-147) that presented photographs, a description and a discussion of its biology and potential agricultural and horticultural impact (http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/pdffiles/IN/IN30400.pdf). Ash whitefly was first detected in the continental United States California in LosAngeles County, California, in 1988, and was later found in Nevada, New Mexico and Arizona. An extensive infestation of ash whitefly on Bradford pears (Pyrus calleryana) was found in Raleigh, North Carolina in 1993 (Hackney et al., 1997), and it has been reported from Texas, South Carolina and Georgia (McDonald et al., 1996).
    [Show full text]
  • A Cost/Benefit Analysis of the Ash Whitefly Biological Control Program in California by Karen Jetter, Dr
    Agricultural and Resource Economics Update A Cost/Benefit Analysis of the Ash Whitefly Biological Control Program in California by Karen Jetter, Dr. Karen Klonsky, and Dr. Charles H. Pickett revious research has shown that healthy street (UCR) obtained a small stingless parasitic wasp, trees significantly contribute to the aesthetic Encarsia inaron (= partenopea) from researchers in Israel beauty of our urban areas. Not surprisingly, and Italy. The wasp was reared in CDFA and UCR Ppeople will demand pest control to protect the aesthetic greenhouses and released throughout neighborhoods beauty of street trees with levels of defoliation as small in California starting in 1990. Two years after the as 5%. Therefore, the preservation of a tree’s aesthetic parasite was released, ash whitefly densities were beauty by controlling pest infestations can result in reduced to numbers difficult to detect even with substantial benefits to the community. In addition, rigorous monitoring efforts. Since 1992, no further healthy trees contribute significantly to property releases of the parasitic wasp have been made and ash values, whereas defoliated trees cause property values whitefly populations remain at undetectable levels. to decrease. The control of the ash whitefly resulted in the The ash whitefly, Siphoninus phillyreae, was first preservation of the aesthetic beauty of ash and identified in Los Angeles County during the summer ornamental pear trees in urban landscapes. This article of 1988. By 1990, it had spread throughout much of estimates the economic benefits and costs of preserving California and caused severe defoliation to its primary the aesthetic beauty of urban street trees from the ash hosts, ash (Fraxinus species) and ornamental pear (Pyrus whitefly biological control program.
    [Show full text]
  • 20123382938.Pdf
    Plant Pest Risk Analysis Concepts and Application This page intentionally left blank Plant Pest Risk Analysis Concepts and Application Edited by Christina Devorshak CABI is a trading name of CAB International CABI CABI Nosworthy Way 38 Chauncey Street Wallingford Suite 1002 Oxfordshire OX10 8DE Boston, MA 02111 UK USA Tel: +44 (0)1491 832111 Tel: +1 800 552 3083 (toll free) Fax: +44 (0)1491 833508 Tel: +1 (0)617 395 4051 E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.cabi.org © CAB International 2012. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced in any form or by any means, electronically, mechanically, by photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the copyright owners. A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library, London, UK. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Plant pest risk analysis : concepts and application / C. Devorshak, ed. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-1-78064-036-5 (alk. paper) 1. Plants, Protection of. 2. Risk assessment. 3. Insect pests--Control. 4. Agricultural pests--Control. I. Devorshak, Christina, 1969- SB950.P55 2012 628.9'6--dc23 2012025556 ISBN-13: 978 1 78064 03 5 Commissioning editor: Rachel Cutts Editorial assistant: Chris Shire Production editor: Simon Hill Typeset by SPi, Pondicherry, India. Printed and bound in the UK by CPI Group (UK) Ltd, Croydon, CR0 4YY. Contents Contributors vii Acknowledgements ix PART I: PEST RISK ANALYSIS BACKGROUND AND HISTORY 1. Introduction 3 2. Basic Concepts in Risk Analysis 7 3. History of Plant Quarantine and the Use of Risk Analysis 19 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Sticky Cotton: Causes
    United States Department of Agriculture Sticky Cotton: Causes, Agricultural Research Effects, and Prevention Service Technical Bulletin Number 1915 June 2007 United States Department of Agriculture Sticky Cotton: Causes, Agricultural Research Effects, and Prevention Service Technical E. Hequet, T.J. Henneberry, and R.L. Nichols Bulletin Number 1915 June 2007 Hequet is Associate Director, International Textile Center, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX. Henneberry was Laboratory Director and Research Leader, Western Cotton Research Laboratory, USDA, Agricultural Research Service, Phoenix, AZ; he is currently Director, U.S. Arid Land Research Center, USDA, Agricultural Research Service, Maricopa, AZ. Nichols is Director, Agricultural Research, Cotton Incorporated, Cary, NC. Abstract Mention of trade names, commercial products, or companies in this publication is solely for the Hequet, E., T.J. Henneberry, and R.L. Nichols, eds. purpose of providing specific information and does 2007. Sticky Cotton: Causes, Effects, and Prevention. not imply recommendation or endorsement by the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research U.S. Department of Agriculture over others not Service. Technical Bulletin 1915. recommended. Adherence of contaminants and lint to cotton This publication reports research involving pesticides. It processing equipment is called “stickiness,” and the does not contain recommendations for their use nor does contaminated lint is “sticky cotton.” Sticky cotton is a it imply that uses discussed here have been registered. worldwide problem, increasing as cotton processing All uses of pesticides must be registered by appropriate machinery is refined because high-speed, large-volume State or Federal agencies or both before they can be processing of lint requires cleaner cotton. Honeydew, recommended. the sugar-containing excretions of certain insects, mainly whiteflies and aphids, are the most frequent While supplies last, single copies of this publication can cause of sticky cotton.
    [Show full text]
  • Entomologia Hellenica
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by National Documentation Centre - EKT journals ENTOMOLOGIA HELLENICA Vol. 21, 2012 First record of Siphoninus phillyreae on pomegranate in Greece Tsagkarakis Antonios Laboratory of Agricultural Zoology and Entomology, Agricultural University of Athens, 75 Iera Odos, GR - 118 55 Athens, Greece https://doi.org/10.12681/eh.11516 Copyright © 2017 Antonios E. Tsagkarakis To cite this article: Tsagkarakis, A. (2012). First record of Siphoninus phillyreae on pomegranate in Greece. ENTOMOLOGIA HELLENICA, 21(1), 39-43. doi:https://doi.org/10.12681/eh.11516 http://epublishing.ekt.gr | e-Publisher: EKT | Downloaded at 20/02/2020 22:40:29 | ENTOMOLOGIA HELLENICA 21 (2012): 39-43 SHORT COMMUNICATION First record of Siphoninus phillyreae on pomegranate in Greece ANTONIOS E. TSAGKARAKIS Laboratory of Agricultural Zoology and Entomology, Agricultural University of Athens, 75 Iera Odos, GR - 118 55 Athens, Greece; e-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT On June 2012, the ash whitefly Siphoninus phillyreae (Haliday) (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) was recorded for the first time on pomegranate in Greece. Its occurrence was observed in a pomegranate orchard at Kato Tithorea, in Fthiotida. Information on its morphology, biology and distribution is presented. KEY WORDS: Aleyrodidae, ash whitefly, first record. Pomegranate is one of the oldest fruit (Coleoptera: Buprestidae) and the woolly species cultivated in Greece, known since whitefly, Aleurothrixus floccosus the prehistoric years. The main cultivation (Hemiprera: Aleyrodidae) (Drogoudi et al. places were mainly the Aegean islands 2012). (Chios, Lesvos, Samos, Rhodos, Kalymnos, The aim of the present study was to Kos), Crete, Peloponnese (Argos, Astros), report the first record of the ash whitefly, Central Greece (Lamia) and Macedonia Siphoninus phillyreae (Haliday) (Hemiptera: (Veria, Edessa, Pella) (Pontikis 1987).
    [Show full text]