DOCSLIB.ORG

Encarsia Catalog of World Species

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Encarsia Catalog of World Species Last updated: August 2020 Notes on catalog: This catalog was produced using Biological and Systematic Information System (BASIS 3.0a developed by Gary Gibson and Jennifer Read (ECORC, Agriculture Canada Ottawa). This catalog of Encarsia is in development and no information presented herein regarding name changes should be considered as valid until properly published. If errors are discovered, please contact the primary author at [email protected]. Production of this catalog has been supported in part by National Science Foundation Grant DEB 1257733 and 1555808, University of California, van den Bosch Scholarship, and hatch project funds. Catalog of the Encarsia Förster of the World Robert L. Kresslein, John Heraty, James Woolley and Andrew Polaszek * Other Hosts: Aphelinidae, Aphididae, Cicadellidae, Coccidae, Plataspidae, Platygastridae, Pseudococcidae, Pyralidae Encarsia of the World — Contents _____________________________________________________________________________________________ Contents Encarsia Förster ............................................................................................................................................. 1 Unplaced Species............................................................................................................................................ 2 Albiscutellum Species Group ...................................................................................................................... 18 Aurantii Species Group ............................................................................................................................... 19 Berlesei Species Group ................................................................................................................................ 33 Boswelli Species Group ............................................................................................................................... 34 Citrella Species Group ................................................................................................................................ 35 Citrina Species Group ................................................................................................................................. 36 Cubensis Species Group .............................................................................................................................. 39 Flavoscutellum Species Group .................................................................................................................... 41 Inaron Species Group .................................................................................................................................. 43 Lahorensis Species Group ........................................................................................................................... 49 Longifasciata Species Group ...................................................................................................................... 54 Lutea Species Group ................................................................................................................................... 56 Luteola Species Group ................................................................................................................................ 59 Meghalayana Species Group ...................................................................................................................... 64 Noyesi Species Group .................................................................................................................................. 65 Opulenta Species Group ............................................................................................................................. 67 Parvella Species Group ............................................................................................................................... 72 Perflava Species Group ............................................................................................................................... 77 Plaumanni Species Group ........................................................................................................................... 79 Porteri Species Group ................................................................................................................................. 80 Scapeata Species Group .............................................................................................................................. 81 Septentrionalis Species Group .................................................................................................................... 82 Singularis Species Group ............................................................................................................................ 83 Smithi Species Group .................................................................................................................................. 84 Strenua Species Group ................................................................................................................................ 86 Tremblayi Species Group............................................................................................................................ 96 Tricolor Species Group ............................................................................................................................... 97 Tristis Species Group .................................................................................................................................. 99 Encarsia of the World — Encarsia 1 _____________________________________________________________________________________________ Encarsia Encarsia Foerster, 1878: 65-66. Type species: Encarsia tricolor Foerster, by original designation. Aspidiotiphagus Howard, 1894a: 229. Type species: Coccophagus citrinus Craw, by original designation. Synonymy by Viggiani & Mazzone, 1979[144]: 44. Aspidiotiphagus Howard, 1894a: 229. Type species: Coccophagus citrinus Craw, by original designation. Synonymy by Viggiani & Mazzone, 1979[144]: 44. Prospalta Howard, 1894b: 6. Type species: Coccophagus aurantii Howard. Subsequently designated by ICZN, Opinion 845, 1968: 12-13. Homonym; discovered by ??. Prospalta Howard, 1894b: 6. Type species: Coccophagus aurantii Howard. Homonym of Prospalta Howard; discovered by ??. Notes: by designation of ICZN under Plenary Powers, Opinion 845. Encarsia; Howard, 1895b: 28. Subsequent description. Prospaltella Ashmead, 1904[238]: 126. Replacement name; synonymy by Viggiani & Mazzone, 1979[144]: 44. Prospaltella Ashmead, 1904[238]: 126. Replacement name for Prospalta Howard Viggiani & Mazzone, 1979[144]: 44. Mimatomus Cockerell, 1911: 464. Type species: Mimatomus peltatus Cockerell, by monotypy. Synonymy by Girault, 1917[312]: 114. Notes: As synonym of Prospaltella. Doloresia Mercet, 1912: 294-296. Type species: Prospaltella filicornis Mercet, by original designation. Synonymy by Mercet, 1930a: 191. Aspidiotiphagus; Mercet, 1912a: 172-173. Subsequent description. Encarsia; Mercet, 1912a: 149-150. Subsequent description. Prospaltella; Mercet, 1912a: 175-177. Subsequent description. Prospaltoides Brèthes, 1914: 12. Type species: Prospaltoides howardi Brethés, by original designation. Synonymy by Brèthes, 1916: 429. Notes: As synonym of Aspidiotiphagus. Encarsia; Mercet, 1930a: 191-193. Subsequent description. Trichaporus; Mercet, 1930a: 193-196. Subsequent description. Trichaporus; Dozier, 1933a: 91. Subsequent description. Notes: Discussion of history and characteristics. Encarsia; De Santis, 1948a: 252. Subsequent description. Aspidiotiphagus (Paraspidiotiphagus) Alam, 1956: 359. Type species: Aspidiotiphagus flavus Compere, by original designation. Synonymy by Viggiani & Mazzone ??, 1979[144]: 44. Notes: Synonymy implied by synonymy of Apsidiotiphagus as this subgenus was not mentioned by Vigginai and Mazzone (1979). Paraspidiotiphagus Alam, 1956: 359. Type species: Aspidiotiphagus flavus Compere, by original designation. Synonymy by Huang & Polaszek, 1998: 1829. Notes: As subgenus of Aspidiotiphagus. Encarsia; Agarwal, 1964: 282-283. Subsequent description. Notes: Characters to separate Prospaltella and Encarsia. Provides a discussion of Prospaltella on page 274 as a "connecting link between Coccophagus and Aspidiotiphagus. Aleurodiphilus DeBach & Rose, 1981: 659-660. Type species: Aleurodiphalus americanus DeBach & Rose, by original designation. Synonymy by Hayat, 1983: 85. Notes: Included acaudaleyrodes, aleuroplati , americanus, arabica, aseta, citrifolia and gerlingi. Aspidiotiphagus; Rose & DeBach, 1981: 670-677. Subsequent description. Notes: Included silwoodensis and cyanophylli . Encarsiella Hayat, 1983: 85. Type species: Encarsiella noyesi Hayat, by original designation. Synonymy by Shafee & Rizvi, 1984: 379. Encarsia; Viggiani, 1988d: 122-125. Subsequent description. Encarsia; Viggiani, 1990: 126-128. Subsequent description. Encarsiella; Polaszek & Hayat, 1992: 192. Revived status. Encarsia; Hayat, 1998: 178-181. Subsequent description. Encarsia; Huang & Polaszek, 1998: 1828-1829. Subsequent description. Encarsia; Polaszek, Abd-Rabou and Huang, 1999: 132-134. Subsequent description. Encarsia; Schmidt et al., 2001: 371. Subsequent description. The catalog of Encarsia of the World is organized by species group placement. Species groups placement is informal, and occasionally variable between authors. This catalog strives to present the history of species group placement of Encarsia in
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Effects of Host Plants, Temperature Regimes, and Mating Scenarios on the Population Dynamics of the Cabbage Whitefly Aleyrodes Proletella L
    Effects of host plants, temperature regimes, and mating scenarios on the population dynamics of the cabbage whitefly Aleyrodes proletella L. (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) Dissertation zur Erlangung des Doktorgrades der Fakultät für Agrarwissenschaften der Georg-August-Universität Göttingen vorgelegt von Khaldon Askoul geboren in Swaida (Syrien) Göttingen, April 2017 _______________________________________________________ ____________ D 7 1. Referentin/Referent: Prof. Dr. Stefan Vidal 2. Korreferentin/Korreferent: Dr. Rainer Meyhöfer Tag der mündlichen Prüfung: 20.06.2017 Für meine Familie Table of contents Table of contents Summary ................................................................................................................................. 1 General introduction .............................................................................................................. 4 Objective ................................................................................................................................. 9 Chapter 1 .............................................................................................................................. 10 Life history parameters of Aleyrodes proletella L. (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) on different host plants ............................................................................................................................ 10 Chapter 2 .............................................................................................................................. 11 Effects
    [Show full text]
  • A Review of Sampling and Monitoring Methods for Beneficial Arthropods
    insects Review A Review of Sampling and Monitoring Methods for Beneficial Arthropods in Agroecosystems Kenneth W. McCravy Department of Biological Sciences, Western Illinois University, 1 University Circle, Macomb, IL 61455, USA; [email protected]; Tel.: +1-309-298-2160 Received: 12 September 2018; Accepted: 19 November 2018; Published: 23 November 2018 Abstract: Beneficial arthropods provide many important ecosystem services. In agroecosystems, pollination and control of crop pests provide benefits worth billions of dollars annually. Effective sampling and monitoring of these beneficial arthropods is essential for ensuring their short- and long-term viability and effectiveness. There are numerous methods available for sampling beneficial arthropods in a variety of habitats, and these methods can vary in efficiency and effectiveness. In this paper I review active and passive sampling methods for non-Apis bees and arthropod natural enemies of agricultural pests, including methods for sampling flying insects, arthropods on vegetation and in soil and litter environments, and estimation of predation and parasitism rates. Sample sizes, lethal sampling, and the potential usefulness of bycatch are also discussed. Keywords: sampling methodology; bee monitoring; beneficial arthropods; natural enemy monitoring; vane traps; Malaise traps; bowl traps; pitfall traps; insect netting; epigeic arthropod sampling 1. Introduction To sustainably use the Earth’s resources for our benefit, it is essential that we understand the ecology of human-altered systems and the organisms that inhabit them. Agroecosystems include agricultural activities plus living and nonliving components that interact with these activities in a variety of ways. Beneficial arthropods, such as pollinators of crops and natural enemies of arthropod pests and weeds, play important roles in the economic and ecological success of agroecosystems.
    [Show full text]
  • San Jose Scale and Its Natural Enemies: Investigating Natural Or Augmented Controls
    California Tree Fruit Agreement Research Report 2002 SAN JOSE SCALE AND ITS NATURAL ENEMIES: INVESTIGATING NATURAL OR AUGMENTED CONTROLS Project Leaders: Kent M. Daane Cooperators: Glenn Y. Yokota, Walter J. Bentley, Karen Sime, and Brian Hogg ABSTRACT San Jose scale (SJS) and its natural enemies were studied from 1999 through 2002. Natural populations were followed in stone fruit and almond blocks, with orchard management practices divided into “conventional” and “sustainable” practices, based on dormant and in-season insecticide use. Results generally show higher fruit damage at harvest-time in sustainably managed fields, although, these results are not consistent among orchards and exceptions to this pattern were found. In conventionally managed blocks, later harvest dates resulted in higher SJS fruit damage, although this did not hold true in sustainably managed orchards. Results from SJS pheromone-baited traps show a predominant seasonal pattern of SJS densities progressively increasing and parasitoid (Encarsia perniciosi) densities progressively decreasing. These data are discussed with respect to SJS fruit damage and parasitoid establishment and efficiency. SJS and parasitoid sampling methodology and distribution were investigated. Comparing SJS pheromone trap data to numbers of crawlers on double-sided sticky tape and SJS infested fruit at harvest show a significant correlation between pheromone trap counts of SJS males and numbers of SJS crawlers. Results suggest that there is a small window in the season (April-May) when sticky tape provides important information on crawler abundance and damage. Results show a negative correlation between the early season abundance of Encarsia (as measured by pheromone traps) and SJS damage at harvest. These results suggest that early-season ratios of parasitoid : SJS can not be used to predict fruit damage or biological control (these data require more analysis).
    [Show full text]
  • Modification of Insect and Arachnid Behaviours by Vertically Transmitted Endosymbionts: Infections As Drivers of Behavioural Change and Evolutionary Novelty
    Insects 2012, 3, 246-261; doi:10.3390/insects3010246 OPEN ACCESS insects ISSN 2075-4450 www.mdpi.com/journal/insects/ Review Modification of Insect and Arachnid Behaviours by Vertically Transmitted Endosymbionts: Infections as Drivers of Behavioural Change and Evolutionary Novelty Sara L. Goodacre 1,* and Oliver Y. Martin 2 1 School of Biology, University of Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK 2 ETH Zurich, Experimental Ecology, Institute for Integrative Biology, Universitätsstrasse 16, CH-8092 Zurich, Switzerland; E-Mail: [email protected] * Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; E-Mail: [email protected]; Tel.: +44-115-8230334. Received: 29 January 2012; in revised form: 17 February 2012 / Accepted: 21 February 2012 / Published: 29 February 2012 Abstract: Vertically acquired, endosymbiotic bacteria such as those belonging to the Rickettsiales and the Mollicutes are known to influence the biology of their arthropod hosts in order to favour their own transmission. In this study we investigate the influence of such reproductive parasites on the behavior of their insects and arachnid hosts. We find that changes in host behavior that are associated with endosymbiont infections are not restricted to characteristics that are directly associated with reproduction. Other behavioural traits, such as those involved in intraspecific competition or in dispersal may also be affected. Such behavioural shifts are expected to influence the level of intraspecific variation and the rate at which adaptation can occur through their effects on effective population size and gene flow amongst populations. Symbionts may thus influence both levels of polymorphism within species and the rate at which diversification can occur.
    [Show full text]
  • Hymenoptera: Chalcidoidea) from Morocco and Comparison with North Africa Region Fauna 55 Khadija Kissayi, Souâd Benhalima and Moulay Chrif Smaili
    Journal of Entomology and Nematology Volume 9 Number 7, December 2017 ISSN 2006-9855 ABOUT JEN The Journal of Entomology and Nematology (JEN) (ISSN: 2006-9855) is published monthly (one volume per year) by Academic Journals. Journal of Entomology and Nematology (JEN) is an open access journal that provides rapid publication (monthly) of articles in all areas of the subject such as applications of entomology in solving crimes, taxonomy and control of insects and arachnids, changes in the spectrum of mosquito-borne diseases etc. The Journal welcomes the submission of manuscripts that meet the general criteria of significance and scientific excellence. Papers will be published shortly after acceptance. All articles published in JEN are peer-reviewed. Contact Us Editorial Office: [email protected] Help Desk: [email protected] Website: http://www.academicjournals.org/journal/JEN Submit manuscript online http://ms.academicjournals.me/ Associate Editors Editor Dr. Sam Manohar Das Dept. of PG studies and Research Centre in Zoology, Scott Christian College (Autonomous), Prof. Mukesh K. Dhillon Nagercoil – 629 003, ICRISAT Kanyakumari District,India GT-Biotechnology, ICRISAT, Patancheru 502 324, Andhra Pradesh, Dr. Leonardo Gomes India UNESP Av. 24A, n 1515, Depto de Biologia, IB, Zip Code: Dr. Lotfalizadeh Hosseinali 13506-900, Department of Insect Taxonomy Rio Claro, SP, Iranian Research Institute of Plant Protection Brazil. Tehran, P. O. B. 19395-1454, Iran Dr. J. Stanley Vivekananda Institute of Hill Agriculture Prof. Liande Wang Indian Council of Agricultural Research, Almora– Faculty of Plant Protection, 263601, Uttarakhand, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University India Fuzhou, 350002, P.R. China Dr. Ramesh Kumar Jain Indian Council of Agricultural Research, Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Y Su Parasitoide Encarsia Inaron (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae) En Morelos, México
    ISSN 0065-1737 Acta Zoológica MexicanaActa Zool. (n.s.), Mex. 27(3): (n.s.) 879-882 27(3) (2011) Nota Científica (Short Communication) PRIMER REGISTRO DE SIPHONINUS PHILLYREAE (HEMIPTERA: ALEYRODIDAE) Y SU PARASITOIDE ENCARSIA INARON (HYMENOPTERA: APHELINIDAE) EN MORELOS, MÉXICO Myartseva, S. N. & C. Lázaro-Castellanos. 2011. First record of Siphoninus phillyreae (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) and its parasitoid Encarsia inaron (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae) in Morelos, Mexico. Acta Zoológica Mexicana (n. s.), 27(3): 879-882. ABSTRACT. This is the first record of the ash whitefly Siphoninus phillyreae (Haliday, 1835) and its parasitoid Encarsia inaron (Walker, 1839) on Fraxinus sp. in Morelos, Mexico. Las moscas blancas (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) son insectos fitófagos de gran impor- tancia que atacan una amplia diversidad de cultivos, plantas ornamentales y árboles de sombra como el fresno (Fraxinus sp.), el cual es plantado por gobiernos locales en las calles de las ciudades formando parte del paisaje urbano. Las moscas blancas se han estudiado durante muchos años por su importancia económica y biológica, se ali- mentan en las hojas y ovipositan en el tejido foliar donde existen otros competidores, además de ser un área frecuentada por enemigos naturales (Gerling 2002). Los afelí- nidos (Hymenoptera) son efectivos agentes de control biológico de moscas blancas e insectos escama (Williams 1996), donde muchas de las especies del género Encarsia son parasitoides primarios de Aleyrodidae y Diaspididae (Hemiptera) (Polaszek et al. 1999, Manzari et al. 2002). El 1º marzo de 2010, se colectaron hojas de fresno con adultos y pupas de mosca blanca en la ciudad de Cuernavaca, Morelos, las cuales fueron trasladadas al labora- torio del primer autor en la Facultad de Agronomía de la Universidad Autónoma de Tamaulipas, y colocadas en cajas Petri para esperar la emergencia de parasitoides.
    [Show full text]
  • History Traits of Encarsia Guadeloupae, a Natural Enemy of the Invasive Spiralling Whitefly Aleurodicus Dispersus G
    J. Appl. Entomol. ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTION Life-history traits of Encarsia guadeloupae, a natural enemy of the invasive spiralling whitefly Aleurodicus dispersus G. Mollot1,2, N. Borowiec2,3, P.-F. Duyck2,S.Glenac 2 & S. Quilici2 1 CNRS, Centre d’Ecologie Fonctionnelle et Evolutive (CEFE), UMR 5175, Montpellier Cedex 5, France 2 CIRAD, UMR PVBMT, CIRAD / UniversitedeLaR eunion, Pole^ de Protection des Plantes, Saint-Pierre, La Reunion, France 3 INRA, Equipe Recherche et Developpement en Lutte Biologique, UMR 1355 ISA, Sophia Antipolis, France Keywords Abstract alternative host, classical biological control, hymenopteran parasitoid, La Reunion, On south-west Indian Ocean islands, many crops and ornamental plants parasitism rate, survival are threatened by the spiralling whitefly Aleurodicus dispersus (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae), which is a polyphagous pest that is native to the Caribbean Correspondence region. Aleurodicus dispersus causes economic damage to various crops on Gregory Mollot (corresponding author), all the islands in the south-west Indian Ocean. The hymenopteran parasit- Centre d’Ecologie Fonctionnelle et Evolutive oid Encarsia guadeloupae (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae) is a natural enemy (CEFE), UMR 5175, campus CNRS, 1919 route de Mende, 34293 Montpellier Cedex 5, of A. dispersus on the Caribbean islands. In this study, we assessed the geo- France. E-mail: [email protected] graphical distribution of the parasitoid in La Reunion, an island in the south-west Indian Ocean where the parasitoid was first observed in 2004. Received: March 20, 2014; accepted: April 9, We also investigated its main life-history traits. Field surveys indicated 2015. that the parasitoid is widespread in most of the low-lying areas of the island and exhibits high parasitism rates on A.
    [Show full text]
  • Catalog of the Encarsia of the World (2007)
    Catalog of the Encarsia of the World (2007) John Heraty, James Woolley and Andrew Polaszek (a work in progress) Note: names in parentheses refer to species groups, not subgenera. Encarsia Foerster, 1878. Type species: Encarsia tricolor Foerster, by original designation. Aspidiotiphagus Howard, 1894a. Type species: Coccophagus citrinus Craw, by original designation. Synonymy by Viggiani & Mazzone, 1979[144]: 44. Aspidiotiphagus Howard, 1894a. Type species: Coccophagus citrinus Craw, by original designation. Synonymy by Viggiani & Mazzone, 1979[144]: 44. Prospalta Howard, 1894b. Type species: Coccophagus aurantii Howard. Subsequently designated by ICZN, Opinion 845, 1968: 12-13. Homonym; discovered by ??. Encarsia of the World 2 Prospalta Howard, 1894b. Type species: Coccophagus aurantii Howard. Homonym of Prospalta Howard; discovered by ??. Encarsia; Howard, 1895b. Subsequent description. Prospaltella Ashmead, 1904[238]. Replacement name; synonymy by Viggiani & Mazzone, 1979[144]: 44. Prospaltella Ashmead, 1904[238]. Replacement name for Prospalta Howard Viggiani & Mazzone, 1979[144]: 44. Mimatomus Cockerell, 1911. Type species: Mimatomus peltatus Cockerell, by monotypy. Synonymy by Girault, 1917[312]: 114. Doloresia Mercet, 1912. Type species: Prospaltella filicornis Mercet, by original designation. Synonymy by Mercet, 1930a: 191. Aspidiotiphagus; Mercet, 1912a. Subsequent description. Encarsia; Mercet, 1912a. Subsequent description. Prospaltella; Mercet, 1912a. Subsequent description. Prospaltoides Bréthes, 1914. Type species: Prospaltoides
    [Show full text]
  • Life-History Parameters of Encarsia Formosa, Eretmocerus Eremicus and E
    Eur. J. Entomol. 101: 83–94, 2004 ISSN 1210-5759 Life-history parameters of Encarsia formosa, Eretmocerus eremicus and E. mundus, aphelinid parasitoids of Bemisia argentifolii (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) YU TONG QIU, JOOP C. VAN LENTEREN, YVONNE C. DROST and CONNIE J.A.M. POSTHUMA-DOODEMAN Laboratory of Entomology, Wageningen University; P.O.Box 8031, 6700 EH Wageningen, The Netherlands e-mails: [email protected]; [email protected] Key words. Hymenoptera, Aphelinidae, Homoptera, Aleyrodidae, whiteflies, Encarsia formosa, Eretmocerus eremicus, Eretmocerus mundus, biological control, life history, longevity, development time Abstract. Life-history parameters (juvenile development time, adult longevity, host instar preference and rate of parasitism) of four parasitoids of Bemisia argentifolii (two strains of Encarsia formosa (D and B), Eretmocerus eremicus and Eretmocerus mundus) were studied in the laboratory. At 15°C juvenile development time was the shortest for E. formosa B (48 days), longest for E. ere- micus (79.3 days) and intermediate for E. formosa D (62.8 days) and E. mundus (64 days) at 15°C. With increase in temperature, development time decreased to around 14 days for all species/strains at 32°C. The lower developmental threshold for development was 11.5, 8.1, 13.0 and 11.5°C for E. formosa D, E. formosa B, E. eremicus and E. mundus, respectively. E. formosa D and B, and E. mundus all appeared to prefer to parasitize 3rd instar nymphs. The presence of hosts shortened adult longevity in most of the para- sitoids, with the exception of E. formosa B, which lived longer than other species/strains irrespective of the presence of hosts.
    [Show full text]
  • 3 Message from the Chairperson's
    Index 04 Message from the Chairperson’s Desk 05 Coconut sector needs Industry led 09 growth strategy Tender coconut water, VCO and Coconut sugar are the emerging products with positive growth rate: Uron Salum Kalpa Krunch An ode to the 16 Ready-To-Eat Snack Goodness of coconut R. Pandiselvam, M.R. Manikantan, 14 Shameena Beegum, A.C. Mathew, and Vindu N S.V. Ramesh Adulteration in Coconut and Virgin Coconut Coconut Fibre: 19 Oil: Implications and Detection Methods A high Dietary Fibre 26 V.G. Mathirajan, A. Karthikeyan and N. Chitra Source Invasion of the Palm infesting 35 Neotropical Whitefly in Coconut 23 Selvaraj, K., Sundararaj, R and Sumalatha, B.V N 30 e Cultivation Practices for Coconut - December w Market C. Thamban, P. Subramanian, Joseph Rajkumar and S. Jayasekhar Review 25 s Indian Coconut Journal 3 November 2019 C Smt. G Jayalakshmi IAS assumes Charge as Chairman, Coconut Development Board Smt. G Jayalakshmi IAS, Director General, National Institute of Plant Health Management (NIPHM) Hyderabad assumed the additional charge of Chairperson, Coconut Development Board. She is a 1995 batch IAS officer of Andhra Pradesh cadre. Presently she is also holding the additional charge of Director General, MANAGE, Hyderabad. Smt. Usha Rani IAS relinquished charge of Chairman, Coconut Development Board Smt. Usha Rani IAS relinquished the charge of Chairman, Coconut Development Board. She is repatriated to her parent cadre of Government of Andhra Pradesh. 4 Indian Coconut Journal C November 2019 Message from the Chairperson’s Desk Dear readers, Hearty Greetings from Coconut Development Board It is indeed a matter of great happiness for me to take charge as the Chairperson of Coconut Development Board.
    [Show full text]
  • Control Biológico De Insectos: Clara Inés Nicholls Estrada Un Enfoque Agroecológico
    Control biológico de insectos: Clara Inés Nicholls Estrada un enfoque agroecológico Control biológico de insectos: un enfoque agroecológico Clara Inés Nicholls Estrada Ciencia y Tecnología Editorial Universidad de Antioquia Ciencia y Tecnología © Clara Inés Nicholls Estrada © Editorial Universidad de Antioquia ISBN: 978-958-714-186-3 Primera edición: septiembre de 2008 Diseño de cubierta: Verónica Moreno Cardona Corrección de texto e indización: Miriam Velásquez Velásquez Elaboración de material gráfico: Ana Cecilia Galvis Martínez y Alejandro Henao Salazar Diagramación: Luz Elena Ochoa Vélez Coordinación editorial: Larissa Molano Osorio Impresión y terminación: Imprenta Universidad de Antioquia Impreso y hecho en Colombia / Printed and made in Colombia Prohibida la reproducción total o parcial, por cualquier medio o con cualquier propósito, sin autorización escrita de la Editorial Universidad de Antioquia. Editorial Universidad de Antioquia Teléfono: (574) 219 50 10. Telefax: (574) 219 50 12 E-mail: [email protected] Sitio web: http://www.editorialudea.com Apartado 1226. Medellín. Colombia Imprenta Universidad de Antioquia Teléfono: (574) 219 53 30. Telefax: (574) 219 53 31 El contenido de la obra corresponde al derecho de expresión del autor y no compromete el pensamiento institucional de la Universidad de Antioquia ni desata su responsabilidad frente a terceros. El autor asume la responsabilidad por los derechos de autor y conexos contenidos en la obra, así como por la eventual información sensible publicada en ella. Nicholls Estrada, Clara Inés Control biológico de insectos : un enfoque agroecológico / Clara Inés Nicholls Estrada. -- Medellín : Editorial Universidad de Antioquia, 2008. 282 p. ; 24 cm. -- (Colección ciencia y tecnología) Incluye glosario. Incluye bibliografía e índices.
    [Show full text]
  • Report 2019-2020
    All India Co-ordinated Research Project on Biological Control of Crop Pests AICRP on Biological Control Compiled and edited by G. Sivakumar Richa Varshney M. Sampath Kumar Amala Udayakumar K. Selvaraj A. Kandan T. Venkatesan Jagadeesh Patil G. Mahendiran Omprakash Navik Veeresh Kumar M. Mohan Chandish R. Ballal ICAR-National Bureau of Agricultural Insect Resources P.B. No. 2491 , H.A. Farm Post, Hebbal, Bellary Road, Bengaluru-560024 All India Co-ordinated Research Project on Biological Control of Crop Pests Annual Progress Report 2019-2020 Compiled and edited by G. Sivakumar Richa Varshney M. Sampath Kumar Amala Udayakumar K. Selvaraj A. Kandan T. Venkatesan Jagadeesh Patil G. Mahendiran Omprakash Navik Veeresh Kumar M. Mohan Chandish R. Ballal ICAR- National Bureau of Agricultural Insect Resources Bengaluru 560 024 1 2 5 3 6 4 Cover page 1. Trichogramma chilonis 2. Final instar larva of fall armyworm 3. NPV infected fall armyworm larva 4. Chelonus sp. larva 5. Parasitized fall armyworm eggs 6. Adult moths of fall armyworm Photo credits: Photographs 1,2, 5 and 6- Dr Omprakash Navik; 3- Dr G. Sivakumar; 4 – Dr A.N. Shylesha Copyright © Director, National Bureau of Agricultural Insect Resources, Bengaluru, 2020 This publication is in copyright. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in retrieval system, or transmitted in any form (electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise) without the prior written permission of the Director, NBAIR, Bengaluru except for brief quotations, duly acknowledged,
    [Show full text]