DOCSLIB.ORG

Including Four Ancient Commenta- Ries

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Including Four Ancient Commenta- Ries CHAPTER TWO HISTORY OF RECEPTION IN ANTIQUITY 1 Ancient Testimonia The roughly forty testimonia (including four ancient commenta­ ries) indicate that the Golden Verses was known to a wide range of authors from late antiquity, including Plutarch, Epictetus, Galen, Clement of Alexandria, Origen, Porphyry, Iamblichus, Gregory of Nazianzus, Jerome, Calcidius, Stobaeus, Proclus, Simplicius, and other Neoplatonists. These testimonia not only provide evidence for the probable date of the poem, they are also invaluable as indications of the context in which the Golden Verses functioned, of its authorship and genre, of the interpreta­ tions of specific terms and passages, and indeed also of the com­ position of the poem. 1 It is clear from the testimonia that the Golden Verses was highly regarded in late antiquity as a concise formulation of the principles of the philosophical life. The Neo­ platonists, starting with Iamblichus, probably all used the poem as a propaedeutic moral instruction preparing the way for philosophy proper. Earlier authors, from Plutarch onwards, also prized the moral value of the poem; for them too, the poem was an instru­ ment to be used to strengthen and reinforce moral conviction. The testimonia may be divided into two general categories, namely, (a) those citing the Golden Verses by name or quoting verses from the poem, and (b) those containing probable allusions to the Golden Verses. In the former category, the most important testimonia, in chronological order, are the following (the verses quoted or alluded to are indicated in square brackets): Chrysippus (281177-208/04 BC) SVF 2.1000 [GV 54]; Plutarch (ca. AD 45-120) Consolo ad Apoll. 29.116e [GV 17-18], De superst. 7.168b [GV 42], De curios. 1.515f [GV 42], frg. 86 Sandbach [GV 7-8]; 1 Previous scholarship has used the testimonia almost exclusively to determine the date of the Golden Verses. Cf. esp. Nauck, "Dber die goldenen Spriiche"; idem, "De aureo carmine"; Pesenti, "Pythagorica," 499-509. 14 CHAPTER TWO [Plutarch] Vito Hom. 153 [GV 17-18]; Epictetus (ca. AD 55-135) ap. Ar­ rian Epict. Diss. 3.10.2-3 [GV 40-44], 4.6.32-35 [GV 40, 42]; Galen (AD 129-99) Affect. dignot. 5.10 [GV 12]; Theano Ep. Pyth. 7.5 (2d century AD?) [GV 38]; A1ciphron (2d/3d century AD) 3.19.7 [ GV title]; Clement of Alexandria (AD 150-ca. 215) Paed. 1.10.94.1 [GV 44]; Origen (AD 185-253) frg. in Ps. 4:5 [GV 42]; Porphyry (AD 234- 30114) VP 40 [GV 40-42]; Iamblichus (ca. AD 240-325) VP 144 [GV 1-2], Protr. 3, pp. 10-16 [GV 45-71]; Iamblichus Arabus in CA [GV 1-71]; Diogenes Laertius (end 3d century AD?) 8.22 [GV 42]; Ausonius (AD 310-94) 363.14-26 [GV 40-44]; Themistius (AD ca. 317-88) Or. 13.175a [GV 42]; Gregory of Nazianzus (AD 329/30-390/91) Or. 4.102.6-7 [GV title]; Jerome (AD 345-419) c. Rufin. 3.39.27-32 [GV title]; Proc1us Arab. in CA (second half of 4th century AD?) [GV 1-71]; Calcidius (fl. ca. AD 400) in Tim. 136 [GV 70-71]; Hieroc1es (early 5th century AD) in CA [GV 1-71]; Stobaeus (early 5th century AD) 3.1.11 [GV 9-16], 3.3.21 [GV 21-26, 39], 3.15.7 [GV 37-38], 3.24.2 [GV 12], 4.25.11 [GV 4],4.37.1 [GV 32-35],4.44.17 [GV 17-18]; Proc1us (AD 412-85) in Tim. 1.203.24-27 [GV 1-2], 3.53.5-7 [GV 47-48]; Ammonius (fl. ca. AD 550) in Porph., pp. 15.17-16.3 [GV 9-10, 40- 44]; Simplicius (early 6th century AD) in Epict. 2, p. 85 [GV 60]; 30, p.328 [GV 7-8]; Elias (6th century AD) in Porph. 12, p. 34.10-12, 16-21 [GV 12, 40-42, 44]; David (6th century AD) Proll. 8, p. 26.6-8 [GV title]; 15, p. 48.24-28 [GV 47-48]; Hesychius (6th century AD) ap. Suda s.v. IIpoKAo~ (II 2472) [GV title]; Arethas (ca. AD 860-940) Scripta min. 40.2-4 [GV 7]; Suda (10th century AD) s.v. IIv9a'Yopa~ (113120) [GVtitle]. The following testimonia contain probable allusions to the Golden Verses: Cato the Elder (d. 149 Be) ap. Cicero (106-43 Be) Sen. 38 [GV 40- 44]; Seneca (5 Be-AD 65) Dial. 5.36.1-4 [GV 40-44]; Galen Affect. dignot. 6.10 [GV 40-44 or whole poem]; Methodius (early 4th century AD) Symp. 6.5.147 [GV 47]. In addition, there are numerous citations of, and allusions to the Pythagorean oath on which GV 47-48a are based. 2 However, since the form in the Golden Verses is derived from this earlier, independent oath, these citations cannot be considered testimonia 2 See Aetius 1.3.8; [Plutarch) Placita 877a; Theo of Smyrna Expos. rer. math., p. 94.6- 7; Lucian Vito auct. 4; Sextus Empiricus Math. 4.2, 4.9, 7.94; Hippolytus Haer. 6.23.4, 1.2.9,4.51.7, 6.34.1; Porphyry VP 20; Iamblichus VP 150, 162; Theol. ar. 18, p. 22.21- 22; Metbodius Symp. 6.5.147; Julian Or. 9.196c, p. 164; Macrobius in Somn. Scip. 1.6.41; Stobaeus 1.10.12; Proclus in Tim. 1.16.31-17.1. .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • THE PHILOSOPHY BOOK George Santayana (1863-1952)
    Georg Hegel (1770-1831) ................................ 30 Arthur Schopenhauer (1788-1860) ................. 32 Ludwig Andreas Feuerbach (1804-1872) ...... 32 John Stuart Mill (1806-1873) .......................... 33 Soren Kierkegaard (1813-1855) ..................... 33 Karl Marx (1818-1883).................................... 34 Henry David Thoreau (1817-1862) ................ 35 Charles Sanders Peirce (1839-1914).............. 35 William James (1842-1910) ............................ 36 The Modern World 1900-1950 ............................. 36 Friedrich Nietzsche (1844-1900) .................... 37 Ahad Ha'am (1856-1927) ............................... 38 Ferdinand de Saussure (1857-1913) ............. 38 Edmund Husserl (1859–1938) ....................... 39 Henri Bergson (1859-1941) ............................ 39 Contents John Dewey (1859–1952) ............................... 39 Introduction....................................................... 1 THE PHILOSOPHY BOOK George Santayana (1863-1952) ..................... 40 The Ancient World 700 BCE-250 CE..................... 3 Miguel de Unamuno (1864-1936) ................... 40 Introduction Thales of Miletus (c.624-546 BCE)................... 3 William Du Bois (1868-1963) .......................... 41 Laozi (c.6th century BCE) ................................. 4 Philosophy is not just the preserve of brilliant Bertrand Russell (1872-1970) ........................ 41 Pythagoras (c.570-495 BCE) ............................ 4 but eccentric thinkers that it is popularly Max Scheler
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter Vii., the Pythagoreans
    CHAPTER VII., THE PYTHAGOREANS 138. ThePythagoreanSchool 139. Philolaus 140. PlatoandthePythagoreans 141. The"FragmentsofPhilolaus" 142. TheProblem 143. AristotleontheNumbers 144. TheElementsofNumbers 145. TheNumbersSpatial 146. TheNumbersasMagnitudes 147. TheNumbersandtheElements 148. TheDodecahedron 149. TheSoula"Harmony" 150. TheCentralFire 151. TheAntichthon 152. TheHarmonyoftheSpheres 153. ThingsLikenessesof Numbers 138.ThePythagoreanSchool AFTER losing their supremacy in the Achaiancities, the Pythagoreans concentratedthemselves at Rhegion; but the school foundedthere did not maintainitself for long, andonly Archytas stayed behindinItaly. Philolaos andLysis, the latter of whom hadescapedas a young manfrom the massacre of Kroton, had already found their way to Thebes.1 We know from Plato that Philolaos was there towards the close of the fifthcentury, andLysis was afterwards the teacher of Epameinondas.2 Some of the Pythagoreans, however, were able to return to Italy later. Philolaos certainly did so, and Plato implies that he hadleft Thebes some time before 399 B.C., the year Sokrates was put todeath. Inthe fourthcentury, the chief seat of the school is the Doriancity of Taras, and we findthe Pythagoreans heading the opposition to Dionysios of Syracuse. It is to this period that the activity of Archytas belongs. He was the friendof Plato, andalmost realisedthe ideal of the philosopher king. He ruled Taras for years, andAristoxenos tells us that he was never defeatedinthe fieldof battle.3 He was also the inventor of mathematical mechanics. At the same time, Pythagoreanism hadtaken root inthe East. Lysis remainedat Thebes, where Simmias andKebes hadheardPhilolaos, while the remnant of the 206 Pythagoreanschool of Rhegionsettledat Phleious. Aristoxenos was personally acquaintedwiththe last generation of this school, and mentioned by name Xenophilos the Chalkidian from Thrace, with Phanton, Echekrates, Diokles, and Polymnastos of Phleious.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Date | 6/9/19 10:06 AM Pseudo-Pythagorean Literature 73
    Philologus 2019; 163(1): 72–94 Leonid Zhmud* What is Pythagorean in the Pseudo-Pythagorean Literature? https://doi.org/10.1515/phil-2018-0003 Abstract: This paper discusses continuity between ancient Pythagoreanism and the pseudo-Pythagorean writings, which began to appear after the end of the Pythagorean school ca. 350 BC. Relying on a combination of temporal, formal and substantial criteria, I divide Pseudopythagorica into three categories: 1) early Hellenistic writings (late fourth – late second centuries BC) ascribed to Pytha- goras and his family members; 2) philosophical treatises written mostly, yet not exclusively, in pseudo-Doric from the turn of the first century BC under the names of real or fictional Pythagoreans; 3) writings attributed to Pythagoras and his relatives that continued to appear in the late Hellenistic and Imperial periods. I will argue that all three categories of pseudepigrapha contain astonishingly little that is authentically Pythagorean. Keywords: Pythagoreanism, pseudo-Pythagorean writings, Platonism, Aristote- lianism Forgery has been widespread in time and place and varied in its goals and methods, and it can easily be confused with superficially similar activities. A. Grafton Note: An earlier version of this article was presented at the colloquium “Pseudopythagorica: stratégies du faire croire dans la philosophie antique” (Paris, 28 May 2015). I would like to thank Constantinos Macris (CNRS) for his kind invitation. The final version was written during my fellowship at the IAS of Durham University and presented at the B Club, Cambridge, in Mai 2016. I am grateful to Gábor Betegh for inviting me to give a talk and to the audience for the vivid discussion.
    [Show full text]
  • Women in Early Pythagoreanism
    Women in Early Pythagoreanism Caterina Pellò Faculty of Classics University of Cambridge Clare Hall February 2018 This dissertation is submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Alla nonna Ninni, che mi ha insegnato a leggere e scrivere Abstract Women in Early Pythagoreanism Caterina Pellò The sixth-century-BCE Pythagorean communities included both male and female members. This thesis focuses on the Pythagorean women and aims to explore what reasons lie behind the prominence of women in Pythagoreanism and what roles women played in early Pythagorean societies and thought. In the first chapter, I analyse the social conditions of women in Southern Italy, where the first Pythagorean communities were founded. In the second chapter, I compare Pythagorean societies with ancient Greek political clubs and religious sects. Compared to mainland Greece, South Italian women enjoyed higher legal and socio-political status. Similarly, religious groups included female initiates, assigning them authoritative roles. Consequently, the fact that the Pythagoreans founded their communities in Croton and further afield, and that in some respects these communities resembled ancient sects helps to explain why they opened their doors to the female gender to begin with. The third chapter discusses Pythagoras’ teachings to and about women. Pythagorean doctrines did not exclusively affect the followers’ way of thinking and public activities, but also their private way of living. Thus, they also regulated key aspects of the female everyday life, such as marriage and motherhood. I argue that the Pythagorean women entered the communities as wives, mothers and daughters. Nonetheless, some of them were able to gain authority over their fellow Pythagoreans and engage in intellectual activities, thus overcoming the female traditional domestic roles.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction
    Chapter 1 INTRODUCTION This book is about mathematics and mathematicians. We will occasionally stray into other areas, but mathematics and mathematicians are our basic theme. This book is not designed to teach you much mathematics. If you learn a little bit, that’s OK, but my goal is to introduce you to my world and the wonderful and sometimes strange people that inhabit it. There is no lack of books that will give you a deeper experience, that will reward your hard work with a bit of real knowledge of mathematics, but this is not one of those books. This book is more like a movie. You will read along and try to see as much as you can. The mathematics will be held up for you to see but you need not make much effort to get enough to appreciate the story, and it’s the story I want to tell. It’s a great story, with lots of drama and comedy and fortunately not so much tragedy; the kind of story most people like. This is not a book for scholars; there are plenty of those. This is a book for ordinary people with a little curiosity about the world we live in and one of the most effective ways to understand parts of it. And it’s an old story, one of the oldest on Earth. It starts with counting animals and looking at the stars, and today mankind is using mathematics to plumb the history of the Universe, and make lasers dance to tunes on IPODS.
    [Show full text]
  • Diogenes Laertius Lives of the Philosophers: Thales, Translated by C.D
    Diogenes Laertius Lives of the Philosophers: Thales, translated by C.D. Yonge Peithô's Web Lives index BOOK I. INTRODUCTION. I. SOME say that the study of philosophy originated with the barbarians. In that among the Persians there existed the Magi,1 and among the Babylonians or Assyrians the Chaldaei,2 among the Indians the Gymnosophistae,3 and among the Celts and Gauls men who were called Druids4 and Semnothei, as Aristotle relates in his book on Magic, and Sotion in the twenty-third book of his Succession of Philosophers. Besides those men there were the Phoenician Ochus, the Thracian Zamolxis,5 and the Libyan Atlas. For the Egyptians say that Vulcan was the son of Nilus*, and that he was the author of philosophy, in which those who were especially eminent were called his priests and prophets. II. From his age to that of Alexander, king of the Macedonians, were forty-eight thousand eight hundred and sixty-three years, and during this time there were three hundred and seventy-three eclipses of the sun, and eight hundred and thirty-two eclipses of the moon. Again, from the time of the Magi, the first of whom was Zoroaster the Persian, to that of the fall of Troy, Hermodorus the Platonic philosopher, in his treatise on Mathematics, calculates that fifteen thousand years elapsed. But Xanthus the Lydian says that the passage of the Hellespont by Xerxes took place six thousand years after the time of Zoroaster,6 and that after him there was a regular succession of Magi under the names of Ostanes and Astrampsychos and Gobryas and Pazatas, until the destruction of the Persian empire by Alexander.
    [Show full text]
  • Life in Ancient Greece Kindle
    LIFE IN ANCIENT GREECE PDF, EPUB, EBOOK John Green,Stanley Appelbaum | 48 pages | 01 Sep 1993 | Dover Publications Inc. | 9780486275093 | English | New York, United States Life in Ancient Greece PDF Book They were phlegm, blood, yellow bile and black bile. In Sparta children were treated very harshly. Classical antiquity in Greece was preceded by the Greek Dark Ages c. Many girls also learned to read and write at home. According to some economic historians, it was one of the most advanced pre-industrial economies. Athletic competitions were held during religious festivals in every Greek city. The Rosen Publishing Group. Eventually, the three actors stood on a stage while the chorus stood in the foreground and commented on the action. Ancient Greek philosophy focused on the role of reason and inquiry. Categories : Ancient Greece Civilizations. In Sparta , the Messenian Wars resulted in the conquest of Messenia and enserfment of the Messenians, beginning in the latter half of the 8th century BC. A crucial part of a wealthy teenager's education was a mentorship with an elder, which in a few places and times may have included pederasty. Socrates has asked his friend to describe how he spends his day. Library resources about Ancient Greece. The cult of Asclepius and Greek medicine existed side by side. Main article: Ancient Greek law. Main article: Roman Greece. At the age of 7 boys were removed from their families and sent to live in barracks. As a result, Rome became the new dominant power against the fading strength of the Sicilian Greek cities and the fading Carthaginian hegemony.
    [Show full text]
  • History of Mathematics Pythagoras and Theano Michael A
    Parabola Volume 46, Issue 1 (2010) History of Mathematics Pythagoras and Theano Michael A. B. Deakin Some years ago, I wrote a biography of Hypatia of Alexandria, the first female mathematician of whose life and work we have a good body of reliable evidence. (See my Hypatia of Alexandria: Mathematician and Martyr, Prometheus Press, 2007.) But I kept coming across references to an earlier woman mathematician, Theano. For ex- ample, Nicephorus Gregoras, a 14th Century Church historian, described a woman, whose mathematical ability he wished to praise, as “another Theano or another Hypa- tia”. I decided to see what I could learn of this other (earlier) female mathematician. So in this column and my next I want to share what I did learn, to indicate the difficul- ties in discovering much more, and to use the opportunity to explore some interesting Mathematics along the way. We learn that Theano was an associate (very possibly the wife) of a much better- known mathematician, Pythagoras, and in order to find out about Theano, we need first to learn of Pythagoras. Now Pythagoras himself, although his name is of course extremely familiar, is actually a rather shadowy figure. There is an accessible article on the Wikipedia website, and you will find another at http://www-groups.dcs.st-and.ac.uk/˜history/Biographies/ Pythagoras.html These are good introductions, and they attempt to tell the history as best as possible, but they also describe the difficulties involved. In fact, if you look at them, you will be struck immediately by the fact that they actually contradict one another in some places.
    [Show full text]
  • Collections Containing Articles on Presocratic Philosophy Richard D
    Claremont Colleges Scholarship @ Claremont Pomona Faculty Publications and Research Pomona Faculty Scholarship 1-1-2013 Collections Containing Articles on Presocratic Philosophy Richard D. McKirahan Pomona College Recommended Citation McKirahan, Richard D., "Collections Containing Articles on Presocratic Philosophy" (2013). Pomona Faculty Publications and Research. 93. http://scholarship.claremont.edu/pomona_fac_pub/93 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Pomona Faculty Scholarship at Scholarship @ Claremont. It has been accepted for inclusion in Pomona Faculty Publications and Research by an authorized administrator of Scholarship @ Claremont. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 1 http://scholarship.claremont.edu/pomona_fac_pub/93/ COLLECTIONS CONTAINING ARTICLES ON PRESOCRATIC PHILOSOPHY 2017-09-18 This catalogue is divided into two parts. Part 1 (pages 1-6) presents basic bibliographical information on books and journal issues that consist exclusively or in large part in papers devoted to the Presocratics and the fifth-century Sophists. Part 2 (pages 7-52) lists the papers on Presocratic and Sophistic topics found in the volumes, providing name of author, title, and page numbers, and in the case of reprinted papers, the year of original publication. In some cases Part 2 lists the complete contents of volumes, not only the Presocratic and Sophistic- related papers. Please send suggestions for corrections and additions to the present version to Richard McKirahan at Pomona College: www.pomona.edu/academics/departments/classics/ Part I Aevum Antiquum. 2001. Vol 1: Special issue on Empedocles. Algra, K.A., P.W. Van der Horst & D.T. Runia, eds. 1996. Polyhistor. Studies in the History and Historiography of Ancient Philosophy.
    [Show full text]
  • Illinois Classical Studies
    18 npoq Tov eiTiovxa—Sources and Credibility of De Stoicorum Repugnantiis 8 JOHN GLUCKER How does one ascertain that a saying ascribed to Zeno of Citium represents a genuine philosophical view of the founder of Stoicism? This is no idle question. By the time of Diogenes Laertius at the latest, most people seem no longer to have read the works of the early Stoics. Having completed the biographical section in his Life of Zeno (VII. 1-38), Diogenes proceeds to offer us, not a summary of Zeno's own philosophy, but a Stoic Koivf|. His excuse for this (VII. 38)—8ia to xotixov KxtatTiv yeveoGai if\c, aipeoecoq— is feeble. The Stoics were no Epicureans or Pythagoreans, claiming to carry on and disseminate the "true doctrines" discovered once for all by a divine founder: even Diogenes' own doxography enters, from time to time, into details about disagreements and disputes among the various Stoics. Plato was also the founder of a "school of thought." This does not prevent Diogenes from presenting us with a long summary of Plato's own dpeoKovTa (III. 67-109). When Diogenes' source supplies an account of various dycoyaC within the same school, he has no hesitation in reproducing his source's doxography with all the shades of difference (III. 86-97). It is merely that by his time, very few people were likely to have read the hundreds of scrolls written by Zeno, Cleanthes, Chrysippus and their disciples and followers—or rather, those of them still readily available. Even by the time of Cicero, the ordinary educated man—even a writer on philosophical themes like Cicero himself—did not attempt to read the original works of the early Stoics, but used summaries and doxographies.
    [Show full text]
  • The CHARIOTEER an ANNUAL REVIEW of MODERN GREEK CULTURE
    The CHARIOTEER AN ANNUAL REVIEW OF MODERN GREEK CULTURE NUMBER48 2010 THE VOICES OF HOMER'S WOMEN Apostolos Athanassakis SAPPHO OF LESBOS Apostolos Athanassakis EPITAPHS Theony Condos GREEK TRAGEDY Francis Dunn PYTHAGOREAN WOMEN Dorota Dutsch ARIS ALEXANDROU, ANTIGONE: -PRESENTATION OF THE PLAY'S TRANSLATION Gonda Van Steen WORKING WOMEN Apostolos Athanassakis WOMEN AND WAR: SELECTIONS FROM REGINA PAGOULATOU, EXILE; THE ANGELS, AND TRANSPLANTS Theony Condos, Apostolos Athanassakis GREEK JEWISH SONGS OF YANNINA Apostolos Athanassakis MARIA LAMPADARIDOU-POTHOU Theony Condos PELLA $20.00 The CHARIOTEER AN ANNUAL REVIEW OF MODERN GREEK CULTURE Formerly published by PARNASSOS Greek Cultural Society of New York NUMBER48 2010 Publisher: LEANDROS PAPATHANASIOU Editor: APOSTOLOS N. ATHANASSAKIS Associate Editor: THEONY CoNDOS Managing Editor: SUSAN ANASTASAKOS The CHARIOTEER is published by PELLA PUBLISHING COMPANY, INC. Editorial and subscription address: Pella Publishing Company, 337 West 36th Street, New York, NY 10018-6401. Tel.: 212-279-9586, Fax: 212-594-3602. One-year subscription 'F20. Copy­ right 2010 by Pella Publishing Company, Inc. All rights reserved. Printed ill the United States of America by Athens Printing Company, 337 West 36th Street, Neiw York, NY 10018-6401. The CHARIOTEER solicits essays on and English translations from works of modem Greek writers. Translations should be accompanied by a copy of the original Greek text. Manuscripts will not be returned unless accompanied by a stamped self­ addressed envelope. No responsibility can be assumed for theft, loss or damage. ISSN 0577-5574 The publication of this issue of THE CHARIOTEER was made possible with the generous contribution of four members of PARNASSOS Greek Cultural Society of New York HENRY CALCANES MARIE CONTOPOULOS GEORGE GALITSIS THEO VAFAKOS PUBLISHER'S NOTE Pella Publishing Company is pleased to invite the readers of The Charioteer to visit our new web site, which can be found at www.pellapublishing.com.
    [Show full text]
  • Early Greek Philosophy
    John Burnet's EARLY GREEK PHILOSOPHY John Burnet, 3rd edition (1920). London: A & C Black INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................. 2 NOTEONTHESOURCES ...............................................................................................................22 A.—PHILOSOPHERS ................................................................................................................23 B.—DOXOGRAPHERS.............................................................................................................24 I.DOXOGRAPHERSPROPER ...............................................................................................25 II.BIOGRAPHICALDOXOGRAPHERS .............................................................................27 C.—BIOGRAPHERS...................................................................................................................28 D.—CHRONOLOGISTS ...........................................................................................................28 CHAPTERI.,THEMILESIANSCHOOL......................................................................................30 I.THALES......................................................................................................................................31 II.ANAXIMANDER...................................................................................................................36 III.ANAXIMENES......................................................................................................................46
    [Show full text]