DOCSLIB.ORG

Bhasker Punjani, Baldev Panchal

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Life Sciences Leaflets FREE DOWNLOAD ISSN 2277-4297(Print) 0976–1098(Online) OBSERVATION ON AQUATIC AND WETLAND PLANT DIVERSITY IN SIPU RIVER BED NEAR SIPU DAM, BANASKANTHA DISTRICT, GUJARAT *BHASKER PUNJANI, BALDEV PANCHAL, Universal Impact Factor 2012:0.9285; NIKUNJ PATEL, BHAVESH MALI, ANKIT PATEL AND 2013:1.2210 VINOD PANDEY Index Copernicus Value 2011:5.09, 2012:6.42, PG CENTRE IN BOTANY, SMT. S M PANCHAL 2013:15.8, 2014:89.16, 2015:78.30 , 2016:91 SCIENCE COLLEGE, TALOD-383215, GUJARAT, INDIA. NAAS Rating Corresponding author’s e-mail: [email protected] 2012:1.3; 2013-16: 2.69 2017-18: 3.98 ABSTRACT: SJIF With an aim to make an inventory of aquatic and wetland plant diversity, 2012: 3.947, 2013:4.802 field explorations were undertaken during November-2016 to April-2017 in InfoBase Index 2015:4.56 Sipu river downstream area near Sipu dam, district Banaskantha, Gujarat, India. The climate of the district is arid and semi-arid, with tropical dry Cosmos Impact Factor 2015: 4.366 deciduous and thorny forests. This floristic survey conducted for the first Received on: time in the study area showed the wealth of aquatic and wetland flora of the 20th May 2018 region under study. A total of 22 species in 18 genera and 12 Angiosperm Revised on: families were recorded for the first time during present survey conducted in 22nd May 2018 Accepted on: the area under study. Of the total recorded species Dicotyledons consisted of th 24 May 2018 58% whereas, Monocotyledons of 42%. The family Cyperaceae turned out Published on: 1st June 2018 as dominant and genus Cyperus considered as dominant genus in the present Volume No. study. An aquatic Pteridophyte - Azolla pinnata R. Brown recorded during Online & Print field exploration from the study area. From the present study, it can be 100 (2018) Page No. concluded that the study area contains a significant proportion of varied 53 to 71 aquatic and wetland plant species, and well adapted to special edaphic and Life Sciences Leaflets is climatic conditions; but their frequency, abundance, etc. were observed poor an international open access print & e may be due to uncontrolled anthropogenic practices in the area. journal, peer reviewed, worldwide abstract KEY WORDS: Aquatic and wetland plants, Sipu river, Banaskantha, listed, published every Gujarat. month with ISSN, RNI Free- membership, INTRODUCTION: downloads and access. The definition of ‘aquatic’ presented by Cook in 1990. Vascular aquatic http://lifesciencesleaflets.petsd.org/ PEER-REVIEWED Page | 53 Life Sciences Leaflets FREE DOWNLOAD ISSN 2277-4297(Print) 0976–1098(Online) plant are interpreted as all Pteridophytina and Spermatophytina whose photosynthetically active parts are permanently or, at least, for several months each year partly or wholly submerged in water or which float on the surface of water. Wetlands are the ‘lands transitional between terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems where the water table is usually at or near the surface or the land is covered by shallow water’. India has over 27000 wetlands of which over 23000 are inland wetland while around 4000 are coastal wetlands. Wetland occupy 18.4% of country`s area of which 70% are under paddy cultivation. Further, out of an estimated 4.1 million hectares of wetlands, 1.5 million hectares are natural, while 2.6 million hectares are manmade. This implies that majority of the wetlands in India are manmade. The coastal wetlands occupy an estimated 6750 km, and are largely dominated by mangrove vegetation. Out of 27000 wetlands, only 26 of these numerous wetlands have been designated as Ramsar site (National Wetland Atlas, 2011). Gujarat is dry state climatically but very rich in wetlands. The most striking aspect is that Gujarat has the maximum amount of land identified as wetland in the country which, is about 34.74 lakhs ha, total wetland area estimated is 3474950 ha, which accounts for about 17.56 % of geographical area of the state. The major wetland types include Intertidal mud flats (2260365 ha), River/Stream (275877 ha), Reservoirs/Barrages (248979 ha), Creeks (149898 ha) and Salt Marsh (144268 ha). The coastal wetlands dominate in the state. Some of the unique wetlands like corals and mangroves are found in Gujarat state. The water spread of wetlands is low during pre-monsoon, particularly; it is significant in case of Inland wetlands indicating rain fed nature of the wetlands. (National Wetland Atlas, 2010). District Banaskantha is located in the northeast of the state. The district gets its name from the Banas River which, runs through the valley between Mount Abu and Aravalli Ranges, entering into the plains of Gujarat in this region and flowing towards the Rann of Kachchh. Rajasthan bound the district in the north, Sabarkantha district in east, Kachchh in west and Patan and Mehsana district in the south. Banaskantha covers an area of 10,757 sq. km with a total population of 25, 02,843 according to 2001 census. In the year 2000, Banaskantha was divided into two districts, one is Banaskantha and the other is Patan district. There are many scattered studies on the aquatic and wetland plants of Gujarat. In Sabarkantha district of Gujarat state work on wetland flora was reported by Patel S K et al., 2014, Punjani and Patel, 2014, Punjani and Chaudhary, 2014 and Jangid M S, 2011. There is no detailed report available on aquatic and wetland flora in any area of Banaskantha district. Moreover, no attempt has been made to study floristically Sipu river bed area near Sipu Dam in Banaskantha district. Hence, for the first time aquatic and wetland plant diversity study was undertaken to prepare a list of Angiosperm plants growing in the area under study. STUDY AREA: http://lifesciencesleaflets.petsd.org/ PEER-REVIEWED Page | 54 Life Sciences Leaflets FREE DOWNLOAD ISSN 2277-4297(Print) 0976–1098(Online) Sipu is the principal tributary of the Banas rising from Sirohi and Mount Abu hills in Sirohi district of Rajasthan state. Abu hills fall between the Banas and Sipu sub-basin. About 30% of Mount Abu hills direct runoff drains into Sipu river while about 70% of mount Abu hills direct runoff flows into Banas river. The confluence of Sipu river and Banas river is 12 km downstream of Dantiwada dam. Sipu dam is constructed on Sipu river in Banaskantha district (Fig. 1), Gujarat state (24° 23' 57.88" north latitude and 72° 18' 31.02" east longitude). The dam is perennial and the water level recedes considerably during summer. The bed is composed of Mostly uniform fine sand and rock exposure. The wetland is predominantly used for fishing and farming. Banas River originates from Aravalli Hills, Rajasthan and meets into little Rann of Kachchh. Its length is 266 km. & total catchment area is 8674 sq.km. Sipu is right bank’s main tributary and Khari is left bank’s main tributary of Banas. Sukli, Balaram, Suket, Sevaran and Batriya are another tributary of Banas on left bank. There is Dantiwada Dam on Banas river at 105.00 km. distance. Its catchment area is 2862 sq.km. On Sipu river, Sipu Dam has 1222 sq.km. catchment area. METHODOLOGY: The present study was carried out in the wetland of Sipu river bed near Sipu Dam downstream area, district Banaskantha, Gujarat. The field trips were organized during the year November-2016 to April- 2017. The study area was visited frequently and floristic survey was done for collecting aquatic and wetland plants. The specimens were observed, photographed in their natural condition with high- resolution camera. The specimens were collected and then pressed by using blotting papers. The specimens were taken to the laboratory of the Botany department, Smt. S. M. Panchal Science College, Talod. Where their morphological characters were observed and identified up to genus/species level with the help of Flora of Gujarat State (Shah, 1978). Cyperaceae of Western Ghats (Wadoodkhan, 2015), Aquatic and Wetland Plants of India (Cook, 1996). Some specimens of wetland species needed microscopic observation for the morphological species identification too. The dried specimens were numbered and mounted on the standard herbarium sheets by using Fevicol. All the herbarium sheets were poisoned with the 1% mercury chloride and then sent to Botany Department. The Maharaja Sayajirao University of Baroda, Vadodara for the confirmation of identified species especially Cyperaceae members. APG-III system was followed to classify the species (http://www.npsoregon.org/documents /APG_III_Oregon.linear.pdf), Author citation and binomial of collected plant species were verified with International Plant Names Index (IPNI) (http://www.ipni.org/ipni /plantnamesearchpage.do) and The plant list (www.The Plant list.org). Preserved herbarium specimens with voucher number were deposited with college herbarium, Botany Department, Smt. S. M. Panchal Science College, Talod with taxonomical information. http://lifesciencesleaflets.petsd.org/ PEER-REVIEWED Page | 55 Life Sciences Leaflets FREE DOWNLOAD ISSN 2277-4297(Print) 0976–1098(Online) ENUMERATION OF PLANT SPECIES: The recorded plant species are arranged as per classification given by APG-III, 2009. The brief out line of classification has been shown in the Table 1. Botanical name: - Vellisneria spirilis L. Family: Hydrocharitaceae Hydrophyte types: Submerged, anchored/ bottom-rooted hydrophytes, leaves in a rosette Life-forms: Annual, but sometime perenneting. Growth-forms: Rosulate Flowering & Fruiting: - Oct.-Feb. Habitat: Found in lakes, ponds, and in slow moving streams and rivers. Salient features: dioecious fresh water herb. Roots unbranched. Leaves strap-shaped, the margins usually with unicellular spines. Inflorescences axillary, spathe or 2 united bracts. Male flower very small, numerous, opening on the water surface. Female flower solitary, long pedicellated, floating on the surface at maturity. Botanical name: - Hydrilla verticillata (L.f.) Royle Synonym: Serpiculata verticillata L.f. Family: Hydrocharitaceae Hydrophyte types: Submerged, bottom rooted, leaves cauline.
Recommended publications
  • Natural Communities of Michigan: Classification and Description

    Natural Communities of Michigan: Classification and Description

    Natural Communities of Michigan: Classification and Description Prepared by: Michael A. Kost, Dennis A. Albert, Joshua G. Cohen, Bradford S. Slaughter, Rebecca K. Schillo, Christopher R. Weber, and Kim A. Chapman Michigan Natural Features Inventory P.O. Box 13036 Lansing, MI 48901-3036 For: Michigan Department of Natural Resources Wildlife Division and Forest, Mineral and Fire Management Division September 30, 2007 Report Number 2007-21 Version 1.2 Last Updated: July 9, 2010 Suggested Citation: Kost, M.A., D.A. Albert, J.G. Cohen, B.S. Slaughter, R.K. Schillo, C.R. Weber, and K.A. Chapman. 2007. Natural Communities of Michigan: Classification and Description. Michigan Natural Features Inventory, Report Number 2007-21, Lansing, MI. 314 pp. Copyright 2007 Michigan State University Board of Trustees. Michigan State University Extension programs and materials are open to all without regard to race, color, national origin, gender, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, marital status or family status. Cover photos: Top left, Dry Sand Prairie at Indian Lake, Newaygo County (M. Kost); top right, Limestone Bedrock Lakeshore, Summer Island, Delta County (J. Cohen); lower left, Muskeg, Luce County (J. Cohen); and lower right, Mesic Northern Forest as a matrix natural community, Porcupine Mountains Wilderness State Park, Ontonagon County (M. Kost). Acknowledgements We thank the Michigan Department of Natural Resources Wildlife Division and Forest, Mineral, and Fire Management Division for funding this effort to classify and describe the natural communities of Michigan. This work relied heavily on data collected by many present and former Michigan Natural Features Inventory (MNFI) field scientists and collaborators, including members of the Michigan Natural Areas Council.
  • Flatsedge (Cyperus Fuscus)

    Flatsedge (Cyperus Fuscus)

    Invasive Plant Science and Management 2010 3:240–245 Spread, Growth Parameters, and Reproductive Potential for Brown Flatsedge (Cyperus fuscus) Charles T. Bryson and Richard Carter* Brown flatsedge (Cyperus fuscus) is widely distributed in Europe, Asia, the Indian subcontinent, and the Mediterranean region of Northern Africa. It was apparently introduced into North America in the late 1800s and has steadily moved southward and westward. Brown flatsedge is reported new to Arkansas and Mississippi herewith. Field observations from early spring until frost were made between 2003 and 2007 from populations present at three sites: Chicot County, Arkansas, and Pearl River and Washington counties, Mississippi. Under natural field conditions, brown flatsedge plants germinated from late March and early April until frost. Inflorescences were observed in mid-May and seed production continued until frost. In field populations, the average numbers of scales per spikelet, inflorescences per plant, and spikelets per inflorescence were 15, 28, and 33, respectively. Greenhouse experiments were established in 2008 at Stoneville, MS, to determine growth parameters and the reproductive potential of brown flatsedge. In greenhouse experiments, by 10 wk after emergence (WAE), brown flatsedge plants were 30.2 cm tall and 63.9 cm in diameter, and dry weights were 1.4, 1.0, 2.0, 0.5, and 1.9 g for roots, culms, leaves, bracts, and inflorescences, respectively. Brown flatsedge culms and inflorescences appeared 5 WAE, and by 9 WAE all plants were producing seed. Brown flatsedge could pose a threat to natural plant communities and rice agriculture in Arkansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, Tennessee, and Texas. Additional research is needed to determine seed longevity and ecological range potential, and to develop inexpensive and effective control methods.
  • Flora.Sa.Gov.Au/Jabg

    Flora.Sa.Gov.Au/Jabg

    JOURNAL of the ADELAIDE BOTANIC GARDENS AN OPEN ACCESS JOURNAL FOR AUSTRALIAN SYSTEMATIC BOTANY flora.sa.gov.au/jabg Published by the STATE HERBARIUM OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA on behalf of the BOARD OF THE BOTANIC GARDENS AND STATE HERBARIUM © Board of the Botanic Gardens and State Herbarium, Adelaide, South Australia © Department of Environment, Water and Natural Resources, Government of South Australia All rights reserved State Herbarium of South Australia PO Box 2732 Kent Town SA 5071 Australia J. Adelaide Bot. Gard. 1(1) 55-59 (1976) A SUMMARY OF THE FAMILY LYTHRACEAE IN THE NORTHERN TERRITORY (WITH ADDITIONAL COMMENTS ON AUSTRALIAN MATERIAL) by A. S. Mitchell Arid Zone Research Institute, Animal Industry and Agriculture Branch, Department of the Northern Territory, Alice Springs, N.T. 5750. Abstract This paper presents a synopsis of the nomenclature of the family Lythraceae in the Northern Territory. Keysto the genera and species have been prepared. The family Lythraceae has been neglected in Australian systematics, andas a result both the taxonomy and nomenclature are confused. Not since the early work of Koehne (1881, 1903) has there been any major revision of the family. Recent work has been restricted to regional floras (Polatschek and Rechinger 1968; Chamberlain 1972; Dar 1975), with Bentham's Flora (1886) being the most recenton the family in Australia. From a survey of the available literature the author has attempted to extract all the relevant names applicable to Australian material and to present them solelyas a survey of the nomenclature of the group. No type material has beenseen, and the only material examined was that lodged in the Department of the Northern Territory Herbariaat Alice Springs (NT) and Darwin (DNA).
  • For Enumeration of This Part a Linear Sequence of Lycophytes and Ferns After Christenhusz, M

    For Enumeration of This Part a Linear Sequence of Lycophytes and Ferns After Christenhusz, M

    PTERIDOPHYTA For enumeration of this part A linear sequence of Lycophytes and Ferns after Christenhusz, M. J. M.; Zhang, X.C. & Schneider, H. (2011) has been followed Subclass: Lycopodiidae Beketov (1863). Order: Selaginellales (1874). Selaginellaceae Willkomm, Anleit. Stud. Bot. 2: 163. 1854; Prodr. FI. Hisp. 1(1): 14. 1861. SELAGINELLA P. Beauvois, Megasin Encycl. 9: 478. 1804. Selaginella monospora Spring, Mém. Acad. Roy. Sci. Belgique 24: 135. 1850; Monogr. Lyc. II:135. 1850; Alston, Bull. Fan. Mem. Inst. Biol. Bot. 5: 288, 1954; Alston, Proc. Nat. Inst. Sc. Ind. 11: 228. 1945; Reed, C.F., Ind. Sellaginellarum 160 – 161. 1966; Panigrahi et Dixit, Proc. Nat. Inst. Sc. Ind. 34B (4): 201, f.6. 1968; Kunio Iwatsuki in Hara, Fl. East. Himal. 3: 168. 1972; Ghosh et al., Pter. Fl. East. Ind. 1: 127. 2004. Selaginella gorvalensis Spring, Monogr. Lyc. II: 256. 1850; Bak, Handb. Fern Allies 107. 1887; Selaginella microclada Bak, Jour. Bot. 22: 246. 1884; Selaginella plumose var. monospora (Spring) Bak, Jour. Bot. 21:145. 1883; Selaginella semicordata sensu Burkill, Rec. Bot. Surv. Ind. 10: 228. 1925, non Spring. Plant up to 90 cm, main stem prostrate, rooting on all sides and at intervals, unequally tetragonal, main stem alternately branched 5 – 9 times, branching unequal, flexuous; leavesobscurely green, dimorphus, lateral leaves oblong to ovate-lanceolate, subacute, denticulate to serrulate at base. Spike short, quadrangular, sporophylls dimorphic, large sporophyls less than half as long as lateral leaves, oblong- lanceolate, obtuse, denticulate, small sporophylls dentate, ovate, acuminate. Fertile: October to January. Specimen Cited: Park, Rajib & AP Das 0521, dated 23. 07.
  • ISTA List of Stabilized Plant Names 7Th Edition

    ISTA List of Stabilized Plant Names 7Th Edition

    ISTA List of Stabilized Plant Names th 7 Edition ISTA Nomenclature Committee Chair: Dr. M. Schori Published by All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be The Internation Seed Testing Association (ISTA) reproduced, stored in any retrieval system or transmitted Zürichstr. 50, CH-8303 Bassersdorf, Switzerland in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without prior ©2020 International Seed Testing Association (ISTA) permission in writing from ISTA. ISBN 978-3-906549-77-4 ISTA List of Stabilized Plant Names 1st Edition 1966 ISTA Nomenclature Committee Chair: Prof P. A. Linehan 2nd Edition 1983 ISTA Nomenclature Committee Chair: Dr. H. Pirson 3rd Edition 1988 ISTA Nomenclature Committee Chair: Dr. W. A. Brandenburg 4th Edition 2001 ISTA Nomenclature Committee Chair: Dr. J. H. Wiersema 5th Edition 2007 ISTA Nomenclature Committee Chair: Dr. J. H. Wiersema 6th Edition 2013 ISTA Nomenclature Committee Chair: Dr. J. H. Wiersema 7th Edition 2019 ISTA Nomenclature Committee Chair: Dr. M. Schori 2 7th Edition ISTA List of Stabilized Plant Names Content Preface .......................................................................................................................................................... 4 Acknowledgements ....................................................................................................................................... 6 Symbols and Abbreviations ..........................................................................................................................
  • Vestured Pits in Wood of Onagraceae: Correlations with Ecology, Habit, and Phylogeny1

    Vestured Pits in Wood of Onagraceae: Correlations with Ecology, Habit, and Phylogeny1

    VESTURED PITS IN WOOD OF Sherwin Carlquist2 and Peter H. Raven3 ONAGRACEAE: CORRELATIONS WITH ECOLOGY, HABIT, AND PHYLOGENY1 ABSTRACT All Onagraceae for which data are available have vestured pits on vessel-to-vessel pit pairs. Vestures may also be present in some species on the vessel side of vessel-to-ray pit pairs. Herbaceous Onagraceae do not have fewer vestures, although woods with lower density (Circaea L. and Oenothera L.) have fewer vestures. Some Onagraceae from drier areas tend to have smaller vessel pits, and on that account may have fewer vestures (Epilobium L. and Megacorax S. Gonz´alez & W. L. Wagner). Pit apertures as seen on the lumen side of vessel walls are elliptical, occasionally oval, throughout the family. Vestures are predominantly attached to pit aperture margins. As seen from the outer surfaces of vessels, vestures may extend across the pit cavities. Vestures are usually absent or smaller on the distal portions of pit borders (except for Ludwigia L., which grows consistently in wet areas). Distinctive vesture patterns were observed in the several species of Lopezia Cav. and in Xylonagra Donn. Sm. & Rose. Vestures spread onto the lumen-facing vessel walls of Ludwigia octovalvis (Jacq.) P. H. Raven. Although the genera are presented here in the sequence of a recent molecular phylogeny of Onagraceae, ecology and growth forms are more important than evolutionary relationships with respect to abundance, degree of grouping, and morphology of vestured pits. Designation of vesture types is not warranted based on the distribution of named types in Onagraceae and descriptive adjectives seem more useful, although more data on vesturing in the family are needed before patterns of diversity and their extent can be fully ascertained.
  • Floristic Discoveries in Delaware, Maryland, and Virginia

    Floristic Discoveries in Delaware, Maryland, and Virginia

    Knapp, W.M., R.F.C. Naczi, W.D. Longbottom, C.A. Davis, W.A. McAvoy, C.T. Frye, J.W. Harrison, and P. Stango, III. 2011. Floristic discoveries in Delaware, Maryland, and Virginia. Phytoneuron 2011-64: 1–26. Published 15 December 2011. ISSN 2153 733X FLORISTIC DISCOVERIES IN DELAWARE, MARYLAND, AND VIRGINIA WESLEY M. KNAPP 1 Maryland Department of Natural Resources Wildlife and Heritage Service Wye Mills, Maryland 21679 [email protected] ROBERT F. C. NACZI The New York Botanical Garden Bronx, New York 10458-5126 WAYNE D. LONGBOTTOM P.O. Box 634 Preston, Maryland 21655 CHARLES A. DAVIS 1510 Bellona Ave. Lutherville, Maryland 21093 WILLIAM A. MCAVOY Delaware Natural Heritage and Endangered Species Program 4876 Hay Point, Landing Rd. Smyrna, Delaware 19977 CHRISTOPHER T. FRYE Maryland Department of Natural Resources Wildlife and Heritage Service Wye Mills, Maryland 21679 JASON W. HARRISON Maryland Department of Natural Resources Wildlife and Heritage Service Wye Mills, Maryland 21679 PETER STANGO III Maryland Department of Natural Resources, Wildlife and Heritage Service, Annapolis, Maryland 21401 1 Author for correspondence ABSTRACT Over the past decade studies in the field and herbaria have yielded significant advancements in the knowledge of the floras of Delaware, Maryland, and the Eastern Shore of Virginia. We here discuss fifty-two species newly discovered or rediscovered or whose range or nativity is clarified. Eighteen are additions to the flora of Delaware ( Carex lucorum var. lucorum, Carex oklahomensis, Cyperus difformis, Cyperus flavicomus, Elymus macgregorii, Glossostigma cleistanthum, Houstonia pusilla, Juncus validus var. validus, Lotus tenuis, Melothria pendula var. pendula, Parapholis incurva, Phyllanthus caroliniensis subsp.
  • Southern Gulf, Queensland

    Southern Gulf, Queensland

    Biodiversity Summary for NRM Regions Species List What is the summary for and where does it come from? This list has been produced by the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (SEWPC) for the Natural Resource Management Spatial Information System. The list was produced using the AustralianAustralian Natural Natural Heritage Heritage Assessment Assessment Tool Tool (ANHAT), which analyses data from a range of plant and animal surveys and collections from across Australia to automatically generate a report for each NRM region. Data sources (Appendix 2) include national and state herbaria, museums, state governments, CSIRO, Birds Australia and a range of surveys conducted by or for DEWHA. For each family of plant and animal covered by ANHAT (Appendix 1), this document gives the number of species in the country and how many of them are found in the region. It also identifies species listed as Vulnerable, Critically Endangered, Endangered or Conservation Dependent under the EPBC Act. A biodiversity summary for this region is also available. For more information please see: www.environment.gov.au/heritage/anhat/index.html Limitations • ANHAT currently contains information on the distribution of over 30,000 Australian taxa. This includes all mammals, birds, reptiles, frogs and fish, 137 families of vascular plants (over 15,000 species) and a range of invertebrate groups. Groups notnot yet yet covered covered in inANHAT ANHAT are notnot included included in in the the list. list. • The data used come from authoritative sources, but they are not perfect. All species names have been confirmed as valid species names, but it is not possible to confirm all species locations.
  • Eleocharis Divaricata (Cyperaceae) and a Note for E

    Eleocharis Divaricata (Cyperaceae) and a Note for E

    Frontiers in Life Sciences and Related Technologies 2(1) (2021) 10-13 Contents lists available at Dergipark Frontiers in Life Sciences and Related Technologies Journal homepage: http://www.dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/flsrt Research article A new species from Turkey: Eleocharis divaricata (Cyperaceae) and a note for E. atropurpurea Mustafa Keskin1 , David Merrick2 1 Marmara University, Institute of Pure and Applied Sciences, Biology Program, 34722, Goztepe, Istanbul, Turkey 2 Durham University, Department of Mathematical Sciences, Durham, DH1 3LE, United Kingdom Abstract In this study, a new species, Eleocharis divaricata, is introduced to science. It is easily separated from other species by its short and divaricate stems, blackish-purple achenes, and amphicarpic proliferation. Also, the presence of E. atropurpurea in Turkey is discussed. Finally, a new identification key is proposed for all Eleocharis species in Turkey. Keywords: Eleocharis atropurpurea; E. divaricata; new species; sedge family; Turkey 1. Introduction second author who is a citizen scholar, but this identification was doubted by the first author who is authoring the genus The sedge family, or Cyperaceae, is the third-largest Eleocharis for Turkey's Flora. monocot family, consisting of an estimated 5.000 species in 104 Later, samples were collected and subjected to scientific genera. The largest genera with approximate numbers of species examination, leading to a conclusion that, they are not E. are Carex, 2000 sp., Cyperus, 550 sp. and Eleocharis, 200 sp. atropurpurea, and they belong to a new species close to E. (Goetghebeur, 1998; Simpson and Inglis, 2001). atropurpurea (Retz.) C. Presl, and E. geniculata (L.) Roem. & The genus Eleocharis is characterized by the leafless stem, Schult.
  • New Records and Notes on the Plant Diversity of Singapore

    New Records and Notes on the Plant Diversity of Singapore

    Gardens' Bulletin Singapore 71 (2): 401–406. 2019 401 doi: 10.26492/gbs71(2).2019-07 Flora of Singapore precursors, 16: New records and notes on the plant diversity of Singapore L.M.J. Chen1, B.E.E. Duyfjes2, Ali Ibrahim1 & W.J.J.O. de Wilde2 1Singapore Botanic Gardens, National Parks Board, 1 Cluny Road, 259569 Singapore 2 Naturalis Biodiversity Center, section Botany, P.O. Box 9517, 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands [email protected] ABSTRACT. Due to ongoing work for the Flora of Singapore, a new family record for Singapore, the Stemonaceae, with one species, Stemona curtisii Hook.f., is recorded. In addition, Ammannia crassicaulis Guill. & Perr. in the Lythraceae is newly recorded as naturalising in Singapore. Notes on two rare species, Hernandia nymphaeifolia (C.Presl) Kubitzki in the Hernandiaceae and Securidaca philippinensis Chodat in the Polygalaceae, currently being revised for the Flora of Singapore are presented. Keywords. Aquarium plant, aquatic plant, freshwater swamp forest, naturalised species New Records of Stemonaceae and Lythraceae 1. Stemona curtisii Hook.f., Fl. Brit. India 6: 298 (1892). – TYPE: Peninsular Malaysia, Penang, Curtis 1522 (lectotype K [K000292133], designated here). Perennial twiner with fasciculate tubers, plant 1–2 m high, glabrous, somewhat branched. Leaves alternate, seldom opposite; petiole 4–12 cm long; lamina sometimes slightly rough, (narrowly) ovate, 6–21 × 2.5–12.5 cm, base (shallowly or) broadly cordate, apex acuminate, 11–17(–19)-palmately-veined. Inflorescences 1–many- flowered; peduncle 1–10(–18) cm long; bracts 6–20 mm long; pedicel 10–20 mm long. Flowers tepals narrowly triangular, 17–30 × 5(–7) mm; stamens 18–25 mm long, filaments c.
  • Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi and Dark Septate Fungi in Plants Associated with Aquatic Environments Doi: 10.1590/0102-33062016Abb0296

    Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi and Dark Septate Fungi in Plants Associated with Aquatic Environments Doi: 10.1590/0102-33062016Abb0296

    Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and dark septate fungi in plants associated with aquatic environments doi: 10.1590/0102-33062016abb0296 Table S1. Presence of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) and/or dark septate fungi (DSF) in non-flowering plants and angiosperms, according to data from 62 papers. A: arbuscule; V: vesicle; H: intraradical hyphae; % COL: percentage of colonization. MYCORRHIZAL SPECIES AMF STRUCTURES % AMF COL AMF REFERENCES DSF DSF REFERENCES LYCOPODIOPHYTA1 Isoetales Isoetaceae Isoetes coromandelina L. A, V, H 43 38; 39 Isoetes echinospora Durieu A, V, H 1.9-14.5 50 + 50 Isoetes kirkii A. Braun not informed not informed 13 Isoetes lacustris L.* A, V, H 25-50 50; 61 + 50 Lycopodiales Lycopodiaceae Lycopodiella inundata (L.) Holub A, V 0-18 22 + 22 MONILOPHYTA2 Equisetales Equisetaceae Equisetum arvense L. A, V 2-28 15; 19; 52; 60 + 60 Osmundales Osmundaceae Osmunda cinnamomea L. A, V 10 14 Salviniales Marsileaceae Marsilea quadrifolia L.* V, H not informed 19;38 Salviniaceae Azolla pinnata R. Br.* not informed not informed 19 Salvinia cucullata Roxb* not informed 21 4; 19 Salvinia natans Pursh V, H not informed 38 Polipodiales Dryopteridaceae Polystichum lepidocaulon (Hook.) J. Sm. A, V not informed 30 Davalliaceae Davallia mariesii T. Moore ex Baker A not informed 30 Onocleaceae Matteuccia struthiopteris (L.) Tod. A not informed 30 Onoclea sensibilis L. A, V 10-70 14; 60 + 60 Pteridaceae Acrostichum aureum L. A, V, H 27-69 42; 55 Adiantum pedatum L. A not informed 30 Aleuritopteris argentea (S. G. Gmel) Fée A, V not informed 30 Pteris cretica L. A not informed 30 Pteris multifida Poir.
  • Floristic Account of the Asclepiadaceous Species from the Flora of Dera Ismail Khan District, KPK, Pakistan

    Floristic Account of the Asclepiadaceous Species from the Flora of Dera Ismail Khan District, KPK, Pakistan

    American Journal of Plant Sciences, 2012, 3, 141-149 141 http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ajps.2012.31016 Published Online January 2012 (http://www.SciRP.org/journal/ajps) Floristic Account of the Asclepiadaceous Species from the Flora of Dera Ismail Khan District, KPK, Pakistan Sarfaraz Khan Marwat1, Mir Ajab Khan2, Mushtaq Ahmad2, Muhammad Zafar2, Khalid Usman3 1University Wensam College, Gomal University, Dera Ismail Khan, Pakistan; 2Department of Plant Sciences, Quaid-i-Azam Univer- sity, Islamabad, Pakistan; 3Faculty of Agriculture, Gomal University, Dera Ismail Khan, Pakistan. Email: [email protected] Received June 4th, 2011; revised July 1st, 2011; accepted July 15th, 2011 ABSTRACT In the present study an account is given of an investigation based on the results of the floristic research work conducted between 2005 and 2007 in Dera Ismail Khan District, north western Pakistan. The area was surveyed and 8 Asclepi- adaceous plant species were collected. These plant species are Calotropis procera (Aiton) W. T. Aiton. Caralluma edulis (Edgew.) Benth., Leptadenia pyrotecnica (Forssk.) Decne., Oxystelma esculentum (L. f.) R. Br., Pentatropis nivalis (J. F. Gmel.) D. V. Field & J. R. I. Wood, Pergularia daemia (Forssk.) Blatt.& McCann., Periploca aphylla Decne. and Stapelia gigantea N.E.Br. The study showed that five plants were used ethnobotanically in the area. All the plants were deposited as voucher specimens in the Department of plant sciences, Quaid-i-Azam University, Islamabad, for future references. Complete macro & microscopic detailed morphological features of the species have been discussed. Taxo- nomic key was developed to differentiate closely related taxa. Keywords: Taxonomic Account; Asclepiadaceae; Dera Ismail Khan; Pakistan 1.