New Hawaiian Plant Records from Herbarium Pacificum for 2019
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
"National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary."
Intro 1996 National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands The Fish and Wildlife Service has prepared a National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary (1996 National List). The 1996 National List is a draft revision of the National List of Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1988 National Summary (Reed 1988) (1988 National List). The 1996 National List is provided to encourage additional public review and comments on the draft regional wetland indicator assignments. The 1996 National List reflects a significant amount of new information that has become available since 1988 on the wetland affinity of vascular plants. This new information has resulted from the extensive use of the 1988 National List in the field by individuals involved in wetland and other resource inventories, wetland identification and delineation, and wetland research. Interim Regional Interagency Review Panel (Regional Panel) changes in indicator status as well as additions and deletions to the 1988 National List were documented in Regional supplements. The National List was originally developed as an appendix to the Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States (Cowardin et al.1979) to aid in the consistent application of this classification system for wetlands in the field.. The 1996 National List also was developed to aid in determining the presence of hydrophytic vegetation in the Clean Water Act Section 404 wetland regulatory program and in the implementation of the swampbuster provisions of the Food Security Act. While not required by law or regulation, the Fish and Wildlife Service is making the 1996 National List available for review and comment. -
Caryophyllales 2018 Instituto De Biología, UNAM September 17-23
Caryophyllales 2018 Instituto de Biología, UNAM September 17-23 LOCAL ORGANIZERS Hilda Flores-Olvera, Salvador Arias and Helga Ochoterena, IBUNAM ORGANIZING COMMITTEE Walter G. Berendsohn and Sabine von Mering, BGBM, Berlin, Germany Patricia Hernández-Ledesma, INECOL-Unidad Pátzcuaro, México Gilberto Ocampo, Universidad Autónoma de Aguascalientes, México Ivonne Sánchez del Pino, CICY, Centro de Investigación Científica de Yucatán, Mérida, Yucatán, México SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE Thomas Borsch, BGBM, Germany Fernando O. Zuloaga, Instituto de Botánica Darwinion, Argentina Victor Sánchez Cordero, IBUNAM, México Cornelia Klak, Bolus Herbarium, Department of Biological Sciences, University of Cape Town, South Africa Hossein Akhani, Department of Plant Sciences, School of Biology, College of Science, University of Tehran, Iran Alexander P. Sukhorukov, Moscow State University, Russia Michael J. Moore, Oberlin College, USA Compilation: Helga Ochoterena / Graphic Design: Julio C. Montero, Diana Martínez GENERAL PROGRAM . 4 MONDAY Monday’s Program . 7 Monday’s Abstracts . 9 TUESDAY Tuesday ‘s Program . 16 Tuesday’s Abstracts . 19 WEDNESDAY Wednesday’s Program . 32 Wednesday’s Abstracs . 35 POSTERS Posters’ Abstracts . 47 WORKSHOPS Workshop 1 . 61 Workshop 2 . 62 PARTICIPANTS . 63 GENERAL INFORMATION . 66 4 Caryophyllales 2018 Caryophyllales General program Monday 17 Tuesday 18 Wednesday 19 Thursday 20 Friday 21 Saturday 22 Sunday 23 Workshop 1 Workshop 2 9:00-10:00 Key note talks Walter G. Michael J. Moore, Berendsohn, Sabine Ya Yang, Diego F. Registration -
Phylogeny of Abildgaardieae (Cyperaceae) Inferred from ITS and Trnl–F Data Kioumars Ghamkhar University of New England, Armidale, New South Wales, Australia
Aliso: A Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany Volume 23 | Issue 1 Article 12 2007 Phylogeny of Abildgaardieae (Cyperaceae) Inferred from ITS and trnL–F Data Kioumars Ghamkhar University of New England, Armidale, New South Wales, Australia Adam D. Marchant Royal Botanic Gardens, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia Karen L. Wilson Royal Botanic Gardens, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia Jeremy J. Bruhl University of New England, Armidale, New South Wales, Australia Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.claremont.edu/aliso Part of the Botany Commons, and the Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Commons Recommended Citation Ghamkhar, Kioumars; Marchant, Adam D.; Wilson, Karen L.; and Bruhl, Jeremy J. (2007) "Phylogeny of Abildgaardieae (Cyperaceae) Inferred from ITS and trnL–F Data," Aliso: A Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany: Vol. 23: Iss. 1, Article 12. Available at: http://scholarship.claremont.edu/aliso/vol23/iss1/12 Aliso 23, pp. 149–164 ᭧ 2007, Rancho Santa Ana Botanic Garden PHYLOGENY OF ABILDGAARDIEAE (CYPERACEAE) INFERRED FROM ITS AND trnL–F DATA KIOUMARS GHAMKHAR,1,2,4 ADAM D. MARCHANT,2 KAREN L. WILSON,2 AND JEREMY J. BRUHL1,3 1Botany, Centre for Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, University of New England, Armidale, New South Wales 2351, Australia; 2National Herbarium of New South Wales, Royal Botanic Gardens, Sydney, Mrs Macquaries Road, Sydney, New South Wales 2000, Australia 3Corresponding author ([email protected]) ABSTRACT Within the tribe Abildgaardieae, the relationships between Fimbristylis and its relatives have not been certain, and the limits of Fimbristylis have been unclear, with Bulbostylis and Abildgaardia variously combined with it and each other. -
Harrisia Cactus Moonlight Cactus Harrisia Martinii, Harrisia Tortuosa and Harrisia Pomanensis
Restricted invasive plant Harrisia cactus Moonlight cactus Harrisia martinii, Harrisia tortuosa and Harrisia pomanensis Harrisia cactus can form dense infestations that will Legal requirements reduce pastures to a level unsuitable for stock. Harrisia cactus will choke out other pasture species Harrisia cactus (Harrisia martinii, Harrisia tortuosa and when left unchecked. Harrisia pomanensis) are category 3 restricted invasive plants under the Biosecurity Act 2014. It must not be The spines are a problem for stock management, given away, sold, or released into the environment. The interfering with mustering and stock movement. Act requires everyone to take all reasonable and practical Harrisia cactus produces large quantities of seed that is steps to minimise the risks associated with invasive plants highly viable and easily spread by birds and other animals. under their control. This is called a general biosecurity As well as reproducing from seed, harrisia cactus has long obligation (GBO). This fact sheet gives examples of how trailing branches that bend and take root wherever they you can meet your GBO. touch the ground. Any broken-off portions of the plant will take root and grow. At a local level, each local government must have a The cactus is shade tolerant and reaches its maximum biosecurity plan that covers invasive plants in its area. development in the shade and shelter of brigalow scrub, This plan may include actions to be taken on certain though established infestations can persist once scrub species. Some of these actions may be required under is pulled. local laws. Contact your local government for more Harrisia cactus is found in the Collinsville, Nebo, information. -
Acanthocereus Tetragonus SCORE: 16.0 RATING: High Risk (L.) Hummelinck
TAXON: Acanthocereus tetragonus SCORE: 16.0 RATING: High Risk (L.) Hummelinck Taxon: Acanthocereus tetragonus (L.) Hummelinck Family: Cactaceae Common Name(s): barbed-wire cactus Synonym(s): Acanthocereus occidentalis Britton & Rose chaco Acanthocereus pentagonus (L.) Britton & Rose sword-pear Acanthocereus pitajaya sensu Croizat triangle cactus Cactus pentagonus L. Cactus tetragonus L. Assessor: Chuck Chimera Status: Assessor Approved End Date: 1 Nov 2018 WRA Score: 16.0 Designation: H(HPWRA) Rating: High Risk Keywords: Spiny, Agricultural Weed, Environmental Weed, Dense Thickets, Bird-Dispersed Qsn # Question Answer Option Answer 101 Is the species highly domesticated? y=-3, n=0 n 102 Has the species become naturalized where grown? 103 Does the species have weedy races? Species suited to tropical or subtropical climate(s) - If 201 island is primarily wet habitat, then substitute "wet (0-low; 1-intermediate; 2-high) (See Appendix 2) High tropical" for "tropical or subtropical" 202 Quality of climate match data (0-low; 1-intermediate; 2-high) (See Appendix 2) High 203 Broad climate suitability (environmental versatility) y=1, n=0 y Native or naturalized in regions with tropical or 204 y=1, n=0 y subtropical climates Does the species have a history of repeated introductions 205 y=-2, ?=-1, n=0 y outside its natural range? 301 Naturalized beyond native range y = 1*multiplier (see Appendix 2), n= question 205 y 302 Garden/amenity/disturbance weed n=0, y = 1*multiplier (see Appendix 2) n 303 Agricultural/forestry/horticultural weed n=0, y -
Jervis Bay Territory Page 1 of 50 21-Jan-11 Species List for NRM Region (Blank), Jervis Bay Territory
Biodiversity Summary for NRM Regions Species List What is the summary for and where does it come from? This list has been produced by the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (SEWPC) for the Natural Resource Management Spatial Information System. The list was produced using the AustralianAustralian Natural Natural Heritage Heritage Assessment Assessment Tool Tool (ANHAT), which analyses data from a range of plant and animal surveys and collections from across Australia to automatically generate a report for each NRM region. Data sources (Appendix 2) include national and state herbaria, museums, state governments, CSIRO, Birds Australia and a range of surveys conducted by or for DEWHA. For each family of plant and animal covered by ANHAT (Appendix 1), this document gives the number of species in the country and how many of them are found in the region. It also identifies species listed as Vulnerable, Critically Endangered, Endangered or Conservation Dependent under the EPBC Act. A biodiversity summary for this region is also available. For more information please see: www.environment.gov.au/heritage/anhat/index.html Limitations • ANHAT currently contains information on the distribution of over 30,000 Australian taxa. This includes all mammals, birds, reptiles, frogs and fish, 137 families of vascular plants (over 15,000 species) and a range of invertebrate groups. Groups notnot yet yet covered covered in inANHAT ANHAT are notnot included included in in the the list. list. • The data used come from authoritative sources, but they are not perfect. All species names have been confirmed as valid species names, but it is not possible to confirm all species locations. -
New Records of Fruit Trees As Host for Neosilba Species (Diptera, Lonchaeidae) in Southeast Brazil
Biota Neotropica 17(1): e20160213, 2017 www.scielo.br/bn ISSN 1676-0611 (online edition) article New records of fruit trees as host for Neosilba species (Diptera, Lonchaeidae) in southeast Brazil Laura Jane Gisloti1*, Manoel A. Uchoa2, Angelo Prado3 1Universidade Federal da Grande Dourados, Faculdade de Ciências Biológicas e Ambientais, Rod. Dourados-Itahum, Dourados, MS, Brazil 2Universidade Federal da Grande Dourados, R. João Rosa Góes, 1761 - Vila Progresso, Dourados, MS, Brasil 3Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Instituto de Biologia, Campinas, SP, Brazil *Corresponding author: Laura Jane Gisloti, e-mail: [email protected] GISLOTI, L. J., UCHOA, M. A., PRADO, A. New fruit trees host for Neosilba (Diptera, Lonchaeidae) species in southeast Brazil. Biota Neotropica. 17(1): e20160213. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1676-0611-BN-2016-0213 Abstract - Fruits of thirty-five cultivated native plant species (19 orders and 12 families) were sampled in farms of fruit production from two municipalities of São Paulo state, Brazil (January 2010 to March 2012) to evaluate species diversity of Neosilba flies. Thirty-one species of plants were the host forNeosilba species while four were not infested. Some aspects of the biology and patterns of species diversity, abundance, infestation rates, puparias viability and the interactions among species of frugivorous flies and their host plants were quantified. Seven species of Neosilba were reared: Neosilba bella Strikis & Prado (4 hosts), Neosilba certa (Walker) (4 hosts), Neosilba glaberrima (Wiedemann) (5 hosts), Neosilba inesperata Strikis & Prado (6 hosts) Neosilba pendula (Bezzi) (15 hosts), Neosilba pradoi Strikis & Lerena (8 hosts) and Neosilba zadolicha McAlpine (26 hosts). The association between the lance flies and the host fruit species is discussed. -
Flatsedge (Cyperus Fuscus)
Invasive Plant Science and Management 2010 3:240–245 Spread, Growth Parameters, and Reproductive Potential for Brown Flatsedge (Cyperus fuscus) Charles T. Bryson and Richard Carter* Brown flatsedge (Cyperus fuscus) is widely distributed in Europe, Asia, the Indian subcontinent, and the Mediterranean region of Northern Africa. It was apparently introduced into North America in the late 1800s and has steadily moved southward and westward. Brown flatsedge is reported new to Arkansas and Mississippi herewith. Field observations from early spring until frost were made between 2003 and 2007 from populations present at three sites: Chicot County, Arkansas, and Pearl River and Washington counties, Mississippi. Under natural field conditions, brown flatsedge plants germinated from late March and early April until frost. Inflorescences were observed in mid-May and seed production continued until frost. In field populations, the average numbers of scales per spikelet, inflorescences per plant, and spikelets per inflorescence were 15, 28, and 33, respectively. Greenhouse experiments were established in 2008 at Stoneville, MS, to determine growth parameters and the reproductive potential of brown flatsedge. In greenhouse experiments, by 10 wk after emergence (WAE), brown flatsedge plants were 30.2 cm tall and 63.9 cm in diameter, and dry weights were 1.4, 1.0, 2.0, 0.5, and 1.9 g for roots, culms, leaves, bracts, and inflorescences, respectively. Brown flatsedge culms and inflorescences appeared 5 WAE, and by 9 WAE all plants were producing seed. Brown flatsedge could pose a threat to natural plant communities and rice agriculture in Arkansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, Tennessee, and Texas. Additional research is needed to determine seed longevity and ecological range potential, and to develop inexpensive and effective control methods. -
Pitaia (Hylocereus Sp.): Uma Revisão Para O Brasil
Gaia Scientia (2014) Volume 8 (1): 90-98 Versão On line ISSN 1981-1268 http://periodicos.ufpb.br/ojs2/index.php/gaia/index Pitaia (Hylocereus sp.): Uma revisão para o Brasil Ernane Nogueira Nunes1*, Alex Sandro Bezerra de Sousa2, Camilla Marques de Lucena3, Silvanda de Melo Silva4, Reinaldo Farias Paiva de Lucena5, Carlos Antônio Belarmino Alves6 e Ricardo Elesbão Alves7. 1Aluno de Pós Graduação (Mestrado) do Programa de Pós Graduação em Agronomia. Universidade Federal da Paraíba. Campus II. Centro de Ciências Agrárias. Areia, Paraíba, Brasil. CEP: 58.397-000. 2Aluno de Graduação em Agronomia. Universidade Federal da Paraíba. Campus II. Centro de Ciências Agrárias. Areia, Paraíba, Brasil. CEP: 58.397-000. e-mail: [email protected] 3Aluna de Pós Graduação (Doutorado) do Programa de Pós Graduação em Desenvolvimento e Meio Ambiente. Universidade Federal da Paraíba. Campus I. João Pessoa, Paraíba, Brasil. CEP: 5801-970. e-mail: [email protected] 4Professora da Universidade Federal da Paraíba. Campus II. Centro de Ciências Agrárias. Departamento de Ciências Fundamentais e Sociais. Areia. Paraíba. Brasil. CEP: 58.397-000. e-mail: [email protected] 5Professor da Universidade Federal da Paraíba. Campus II. Centro de Ciências Agrárias. Departamento de Fitotecnia e Ciências Ambientais. Setor de Ecologia e Biodiversidade. Laboratório de Etnoecologia. Areia. Paraíba. Brasil. CEP: 58.397-000. e-mail: [email protected] 6Professor da Universidade Estadual da Paraíba. Centro de Humanidades. Guarabira, Paraíba, Brasil. CEP: 58.200-000. e-mail: [email protected] 7Pesquisadores da Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária. EMBRAPA Agroindústria Tropical. Fortaleza. Ceará, Brasil. CEP: 60511-110. e-mail: [email protected]; [email protected] Artigo recebido em 17 janeiro 2013; aceito para publicação em 8 março 2014; publicado 12 março 2014 Resumo As espécies da família Cactaceae, possivelmente tiveram sua origem na América do Norte, Central e do Sul. -
FDA Has No Questions
Valentina Carpio-Téllez Parabel Ltd. 7898 Headwaters Commerce Street Fellsmere, FL 32948 Re: GRAS Notice No. GRN 000742 Dear Ms. Carpio-Téllez: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA, we) completed our evaluation of GRN 000742. We received Parabel’s notice on November 8, 2017 and filed it on December 19, 2017. Parabel submitted amendments to the notice on February 19, 2018; April 16, 2018; June 12, 2018; and August 1, 2018. The amendments included revisions to the dietary exposure assessment. The subjects of the notice are duckweed powder (DWP) and degreened duckweed powder (DDWP) for use as a source of protein in food at levels ranging from 3-20%.1 The notice informs us of Parabel’s view that this use of DWP and DDWP is GRAS through scientific procedures. Our use of the terms “duckweed powder” and “degreened duckweed powder” in this letter is not our recommendation of those terms as appropriate common or usual names for declaring the substances in accordance with FDA’s labeling requirements. Under Title 21 of the United States Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 101.4, each ingredient must be declared by its common or usual name. In addition, 21 CFR 102.5 outlines general principles to use when establishing common or usual names for nonstandardized foods. Issues associated with labeling and the common or usual name of a food ingredient are under the purview of the Office of Nutrition and Food Labeling (ONFL) in the Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition. The Office of Food Additive Safety (OFAS) did not consult with ONFL regarding the appropriate common or usual name for “duckweed powder” and “degreened duckweed powder.” Duckweeds are aquatic plants in the Lemnoideae subfamily of the plant family Araceae.2 The notifier intends to use multiple species from the genera Landoltia, Lemna, Wolffia, and Wolfiella.3 Although the products may derive from different duckweed species, the 1 Excluding products regulated by the United States Department of Agriculture. -
Urochloa Subquadripara (Poaceae: Paniceae) New to Texas and a Key to Urochloa of Texas
Hatch, S.L. 2010. Urochloa subquadripara (Poaceae: Paniceae) new to Texas and a key to Urochloa of Texas. Phytoneuron 2010-8: 1-4. (8 April) UROCHLOA SUBQUADRIPARA (POACEAE: PANICEAE) NEW TO TEXAS AND A KEY TO UROCHLOA OF TEXAS Stephan L. Hatch S.M. Tracy Herbarium (TAES) Department of Ecosystem Science and Management Texas A&M University College Station, TX 77843-2138, U.S.A. [email protected] ABSTRACT Urochloa subquadripara is reported as introduced into Texas. A key to separate the 13 species of Urochloa in Texas is presented along with an image of the newly reported species. KEY WORDS : Poaceae, Urochloa , Texas, introduced, invasive plant Urochloa P. Beauv. is primarily a grass genus of Old World origin. Thirteen of the estimated 100 species (Wipff & Thompson 2003) worldwide occur in Texas. This genus was separated from closely related or similar Paniceae by Wipff et al. in 1993. Urochloa (Wipff & Thompson 2003) is described as having terminal and axilliary panicle inflorescences with 2 to several spicate primary unilateral branches. Spikelets are solitary, paired, or in triplets and occur in 1–2 (4) rows per primary branch. With 2 florets per spikelet, the upper floret is fertile, indurate and rugose to verrucose, the lower floret sterile or staminate. A key to three Urochloa species was published by Wipff et al. (1993). Eight of the Texas taxa are introduced (five invasive) and five are native to North America. The introduced taxa are native to tropical or subtropical regions of the world and their points of introduction appear to be from the coast or south Texas and following a period of adaptation move inland and/or to the north. -
Floristic Discoveries in Delaware, Maryland, and Virginia
Knapp, W.M., R.F.C. Naczi, W.D. Longbottom, C.A. Davis, W.A. McAvoy, C.T. Frye, J.W. Harrison, and P. Stango, III. 2011. Floristic discoveries in Delaware, Maryland, and Virginia. Phytoneuron 2011-64: 1–26. Published 15 December 2011. ISSN 2153 733X FLORISTIC DISCOVERIES IN DELAWARE, MARYLAND, AND VIRGINIA WESLEY M. KNAPP 1 Maryland Department of Natural Resources Wildlife and Heritage Service Wye Mills, Maryland 21679 [email protected] ROBERT F. C. NACZI The New York Botanical Garden Bronx, New York 10458-5126 WAYNE D. LONGBOTTOM P.O. Box 634 Preston, Maryland 21655 CHARLES A. DAVIS 1510 Bellona Ave. Lutherville, Maryland 21093 WILLIAM A. MCAVOY Delaware Natural Heritage and Endangered Species Program 4876 Hay Point, Landing Rd. Smyrna, Delaware 19977 CHRISTOPHER T. FRYE Maryland Department of Natural Resources Wildlife and Heritage Service Wye Mills, Maryland 21679 JASON W. HARRISON Maryland Department of Natural Resources Wildlife and Heritage Service Wye Mills, Maryland 21679 PETER STANGO III Maryland Department of Natural Resources, Wildlife and Heritage Service, Annapolis, Maryland 21401 1 Author for correspondence ABSTRACT Over the past decade studies in the field and herbaria have yielded significant advancements in the knowledge of the floras of Delaware, Maryland, and the Eastern Shore of Virginia. We here discuss fifty-two species newly discovered or rediscovered or whose range or nativity is clarified. Eighteen are additions to the flora of Delaware ( Carex lucorum var. lucorum, Carex oklahomensis, Cyperus difformis, Cyperus flavicomus, Elymus macgregorii, Glossostigma cleistanthum, Houstonia pusilla, Juncus validus var. validus, Lotus tenuis, Melothria pendula var. pendula, Parapholis incurva, Phyllanthus caroliniensis subsp.