Learning Lessons from the 2007 Floods (2008)
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Homeowners Handbook to Prepare for Natural Disasters
HOMEOWNERS HANDBOOK HANDBOOK HOMEOWNERS DELAWARE HOMEOWNERS TO PREPARE FOR FOR TO PREPARE HANDBOOK TO PREPARE FOR NATURAL HAZARDSNATURAL NATURAL HAZARDS TORNADOES COASTAL STORMS SECOND EDITION SECOND Delaware Sea Grant Delaware FLOODS 50% FPO 15-0319-579-5k ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This handbook was developed as a cooperative project among the Delaware Emergency Management Agency (DEMA), the Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control (DNREC) and the Delaware Sea Grant College Program (DESG). A key priority of this project partnership is to increase the resiliency of coastal communities to natural hazards. One major component of strong communities is enhancing individual resilience and recognizing that adjustments to day-to- day living are necessary. This book is designed to promote individual resilience, thereby creating a fortified community. The second edition of the handbook would not have been possible without the support of the following individuals who lent their valuable input and review: Mike Powell, Jennifer Pongratz, Ashley Norton, David Warga, Jesse Hayden (DNREC); Damaris Slawik (DEMA); Darrin Gordon, Austin Calaman (Lewes Board of Public Works); John Apple (Town of Bethany Beach Code Enforcement); Henry Baynum, Robin Davis (City of Lewes Building Department); John Callahan, Tina Callahan, Kevin Brinson (University of Delaware); David Christopher (Delaware Sea Grant); Kevin McLaughlin (KMD Design Inc.); Mark Jolly-Van Bodegraven, Pam Donnelly and Tammy Beeson (DESG Environmental Public Education Office). Original content from the first edition of the handbook was drafted with assistance from: Mike Powell, Greg Williams, Kim McKenna, Jennifer Wheatley, Tony Pratt, Jennifer de Mooy and Morgan Ellis (DNREC); Ed Strouse, Dave Carlson, and Don Knox (DEMA); Joe Thomas (Sussex County Emergency Operations Center); Colin Faulkner (Kent County Department of Public Safety); Dave Carpenter, Jr. -
Final Infrastructure Delivery Plan 2019
Contents Context of IDP Update 2019 (01/04/2018 – 31/03/2019) ....................................................... 2 Section 1 – Infrastructure Delivery Plan Update, December 2019 Summary Tables ............. 3 1.1 IDP Update Bicester Projects .................................................................................. 4 1.2 IDP Update Banbury Projects ................................................................................. 8 1.3 IDP Update Kidlington and Rural Areas Projects .................................................. 10 Section 2 – Infrastructure Delivery Plan Update, December 2019 ....................................... 14 2.1 IDP Update Bicester Projects .................................................................................... 15 2.2 IDP Update Banbury Projects .................................................................................... 37 2.3 IDP Update Kidlington and Rural Areas Projects ....................................................... 55 1 Context of IDP Update 2019 (01/04/2018 – 31/03/2019) Infrastructure is an essential part of sustainable development supporting increased housing provision and economic growth, mitigating against climate change and facilitating improved quality of life within communities. The Infrastructure Delivery Plan (IDP) contains the infrastructure required to support Cherwell Local Plan Part 1 adopted in July 2015 and it is set out in Appendix 8 of the Plan. The IDP is a live document adjusted overtime to reflect changes in circumstance and strategies alongside -
152 Bankside Banbury
152 Bankside Banbury 152 Bankside Banbury, Oxfordshire, OX16 9TD Approximate distances Banbury town centre 0.75 miles Banbury railway station (rear access) 0.75 miles Junction 11 (M40 motorway) 2 miles Oxford 22 miles Stratford upon Avon 20 miles Leamington Spa 19 miles Banbury to London Marylebone by rail 55 mins Banbury to Birmingham by rail approx. 50 mins Banbury to Oxford by rail approx. 19 mins A SPACIOUS TWO BEDROOMED FIRST FLOOR MAISONETTE ON THE EDGE OF CHERWELL HEIGHTS WITH FAR REACHING VIEWS. Hall, stairs and landing, living room, kitchen, two double bedrooms, bathroom, garden, garage, no onward chain. Energy rating E. £165,000 Directions A floorplan has been prepared to show the From Banbury town centre proceed via the High dimensions and layout of the property as detailed Street into George Street and continue to the below. Some of the main features are as follows: traffic lights. Turn right into Lower Cherwell Street and bear left passing the petrol station and * A uPVC double glazed door opens to a hall with Morrisons on the right. A little further on turn left storage and stairs leading to the landing. into Bankside and continue for approximately 500 yards until the property can be found on the right * Sitting room with large window to the front hand side and can be recognised by our "For with lovely outlooks to the new development and Sale" board. miles of countryside beyond. Situation BANBURY is conveniently located only two miles * Kitchen with a range of base units, electric from Junction 11 of the M40, putting Oxford (23 cooker point, plumbing for washing machine, miles), Birmingham (43 miles), London (78 miles) space for fridge/freezer, window to front with and of course the rest of the motorway network views. -
Examining the Relationship Between Social Welfare Nonprofitization and Service Expansiveness in Canada and the United Kingdom
The Nonprofitized Welfare State: Examining the Relationship between Social Welfare Nonprofitization and Service Expansiveness in Canada and the United Kingdom by Kristen Pue A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Political Science Department of Political Science University of Toronto Ó Copyright by Kristen Pue 2021 The Nonprofitized Welfare State: Examining the Relationship between Social Welfare Nonprofitization and Service Expansiveness in Canada and the United Kingdom Kristen Pue Doctor of Philosophy in Political Science Department of Political Science University of Toronto 2021 Abstract When governments reach out to nonprofit organizations to provide social welfare services, a common argument posits, service expansiveness is weakened: either contracting out is an explicit abdication of public duty or it creates incentives that undermine service expansiveness over time. And yet the evidence does not seem to support this simple explanation of welfare state nonprofitization. This dissertation presents a comparison of nonprofitized welfare in two countries – Canada and the United Kingdom – and two policy areas – homelessness and emergency management. It argues, first, that there is no necessary relationship between the level of nonprofitization and social welfare expansiveness. Nonprofitization occurs within a context where the public duty is being continuously renegotiated, meaning that the boundaries of the welfare state are always in flux. Two pathways to nonprofitization result from the different directions of these fluctuations: cost-cutting and co-optation. While the cost-cutting pathway is linked to service contraction, co-optation is linked to the expansion of public duty. Thus, there is no single overarching relationship between welfare nonprofitization and service expansiveness: nonprofitization operates in both directions. -
Opzet Draaiboek STAR-FLOOD
Strengthening and Redesigning European Flood Risk Practices Towards Appropriate and Resilient Flood Risk Governance Arrangements Analysing and evaluating flood risk governance in England – Enhancing societal resilience through comprehensive and aligned flood risk governance arrangements Alexander, M., Priest, S., Micou, A.P., Tapsell, S., Green, C., Parker, D., and Homewood, S. Date: 31 March 2016 Report Number: D3.3 Milestone number: MS3 Due date for deliverable: 30 September 2015 Actual submission date: 28 September 2015 STAR-FLOOD receives funding from the EU 7th Framework programme (FP7/2007-2013) under grant agreement 308364 Document Dissemination Level PU Public Co-ordinator: Utrecht University Project Contract No: 308364 Project website: www.starflood.eu ISBN: i Cover photo left: Thames Barrier (Dries Hegger, 2013) Cover photo right: City of London (Dries Hegger, 2013) Document information Work Package 3 Consortium Body Flood Hazard Research Centre, Middlesex University Year 2016 Document type Deliverable 3.3 Date 11th September 2015 (With amendments made in February 2016) Author(s) Alexander, M., Priest, S., Micou, A., Tapsell, S., Green, C., Parker, D., and Homewood, S. Acknowledgement The work described in this publication was supported by the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme through the grant to the budget of the Integrated Project STAR-FLOOD, Contract 308364. We would like to acknowledge and offer our gratitude to the flood risk professionals and academic experts who participated in this research. We also appreciate the valuable critique provided by Prof. Edmund Penning-Rowsell. Disclaimer This document reflects only the authors’ views and not those of the European Union. This work may rely on data from sources external to the STAR-FLOOD project Consortium. -
Great Britain Passenger Rail: the Current Expected Timetable
Great Britain passenger rail: the current expected timetable Franchise Current operator 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Onwards DJFMA MJJASONDJFMA MJJASONDJFMA MJJASOND South West Stagecoach West Midlands Govia East Midlands Stagecoach O I South Eastern Govia O I Wales & Borders Arriva InterCity W.C./W.C. Partnership Virgin/Stagecoach O I Cross Country Arriva OI Great Western First Group OI Apr. Chiltern Chiltern OITo Dec. 2021 To Jul. 2022 TSGN Govia O I To Sep. 2021 To Sep. 2023 East West n/a Potential development and competition period InterCity East Coast Stagecoach/Virgin To Mar. 2023 To Mar. 2024 ScotRail Abellio To Apr. 2022 To Apr. 2025 TransPennine Express First Group To Apr. 2023 To Apr. 2025 Northern Arriva To Apr. 2025 To Apr. 2026 East Anglia Abellio To Oct. 2025 To Oct. 2026 Caledonian Sleeper Serco To Apr. 2030 Essex Thameside Trenitalia To Nov. 2029 To Jun. 2030 Concession London Rail Arriva To Apr. 2024 To Apr. 2026 Tyne and Wear PTE Nexus Crossrail MTR To May 2023 To May 2025 MerseyRail Serco/Abellio To Jul. 2028 Based on publicly available information as at 1 April 2017 Key Existing franchise/concession term O OJEU notice expected Extension/direct award I ITT expected Max. length at discretion of DfT/TS Contract award expected New franchise/concession Operated by PTE Nexus Rail Finance Firm Rail Finance Firm Rail Finance Firm Rail Finance Firm Band 1 for Rail Band 1 for Rail Band 1 for Rail of the Year of the Year of the Year of the Year Finance Franchising Global Transport Global Transport Global Transport Global Transport Chambers UK 2015 The Legal 500 Chambers UK 2017 Finance 2016 Finance 2015 Finance 2014 Finance 2013 UK 2016 Stephenson Harwood LLP is a law firm of over 900 people worldwide, including 150 partners. -
Scotrail Franchise – Franchise Agreement
ScotRail Franchise – Franchise Agreement THE SCOTTISH MINISTERS and ABELLIO SCOTRAIL LIMITED SCOTRAIL FRANCHISE AGREEMENT 6453447-13 ScotRail Franchise – Franchise Agreement TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Interpretation and Definitions .................................................................................... 1 2. Commencement .......................................................................................................... 2 3. Term ............................................................................................................ 3 4 Franchisee’s Obligations ........................................................................................... 3 5 Unjustified Enrichment ............................................................................................... 4 6 Arm's Length Dealings ............................................................................................... 4 7 Compliance with Laws................................................................................................ 4 8 Entire Agreement ........................................................................................................ 4 9 Governing Law ............................................................................................................ 5 SCHEDULE 1 ............................................................................................................ 7 PASSENGER SERVICE OBLIGATIONS ............................................................................................. 7 SCHEDULE 1.1 ........................................................................................................... -
Local Flood Risk Management Strategy
Royal Borough of Windsor & Maidenhead Local Flood Risk Management Strategy Published in December 2014 RBWM Local Flood Risk Management Strategy December 2014 2 RBWM Local Flood Risk Management Strategy December 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS PART A: GENERAL INFORMATION .............................................................................................8 1 Introduction ......................................................................................................................8 1.1 The Purpose of the Strategy ...........................................................................................8 1.2 Overview of the Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead ................................................9 1.3 Types of flooding ....................................................................................................... 11 1.4 Who is this Strategy aimed at? .....................................................................................12 1.5 The period covered by the Strategy ...............................................................................12 1.6 The Objectives of the Strategy ......................................................................................12 1.7 Scrutiny and Review ...................................................................................................13 2 Legislative Context ..........................................................................................................14 2.1 The Pitt Review .........................................................................................................14 -
Modelling Elevations, Inundation Extent and Hazard Risk for Extreme Flood Events
Modelling elevations, inundation extent and hazard risk for extreme flood events by Davor Kvo čka A thesis submitted to Cardiff University in candidature for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Cardiff, 2017 Dedicated to my parents Marija Čoli ć and Milenko Kvočka i Abstract Abstract Climate change is expected to result in more frequent occurrences of extreme flood events, such as flash flooding and large scale river flooding. Therefore, there is a need for accurate flood risk assessment schemes in areas prone to extreme flooding. This research study investigates what flood risk assessment tools and procedures should be used for flood risk assessment in areas where the emergence of extreme flood events is possible. The first objective was to determine what type of flood inundation models should be used for predicting the flood elevations, velocities and inundation extent for extreme flood events. Therefore, there different flood inundation model structures were used to model a well-documented extreme flood event. The obtained results suggest that it is necessary to incorporate shock-capturing algorithms in the solution procedure when modelling extreme flood events, since these algorithms prevent the formation of spurious oscillations and provide a more realistic simulation of the flood levels. The second objective was to investigate the appropriateness of the “simplification strategy” (i.e. improving simulation results by increasing roughness parameter) when used as a flood risk assessment modelling tool for areas susceptible to extreme flooding. The obtained results suggest that applying such strategies can lead to significantly erroneous predictions of the peak water levels and the inundation extent, and thus to inadequate flood protection design. -
12/00849/F Hardstanding Between Railway
Hardstanding between railway and 12/00849/F Higham Way, adjacent Integrated Control Centre, Banbury Ward: Banbury Grimsbury and Castle District Councillors: Cllr Beere, Cllr Bonner, Cllr Cullip Case Officer: Simon Dean Recommendation: Refusal Applicant: Chiltern Railway Company Ltd Application Description: Construction of a multi-storey station car park for rail customer parking and formation of a new east-side access to Banbury station with associated pedestrian link bridge Committee Referral: Major 1. Site Description and Proposed Development 1.1 The application site is approximately 1 acre (0.4ha) of land to the East of Banbury Station, accessed from Higham Way, lying between the Marshall Road flats (the former cattle-market site) and the railway lines. 1.2 At present, the site is mainly hardstanding, with an element of concrete slab, providing some parking, an element of outside storage for Network Rail, as well as access to the track. The southern part of the hardstanding, outside the application site, but accessed from within it has the Chiltern Railways’ Integrated Control Centre (ICC) on it. The site is bounded by the railway to the west, ICC to the south, sorting office to the north, and access road and Marshall Road flats to the east. 1.3 The application seeks permission for a multi-storey car park for rail passenger use, providing 707 car parking spaces, associated drop-off circulation space and a pedestrian bridge linking the car park to the eastern-end of the station building. Vehicular and pedestrian access to the car park will be from the northern end of the site, minimising travel distance along Higham Way from Merton St and to allow direct pedestrian access from Higham Way to the stairs and lift to the link bridge and the station beyond. -
The Impact of Flood Risk on the Price Of
The Impact of Flood Risk on the Price of Residential Properties: The Case of England Philippe Bélanger & Michael Bourdeau-Brien 1 Department of Finance, Insurance and Real Estate, Université Laval Email: [email protected] [email protected] Areas / Paper type – Change and Risk - Issues for Property Valuation work? ABSTRACT This paper examines the impact of flood risk on the value of England residential properties. We find that being located within a flood zone significantly lowers property values once we control for the proximity to a watercourse that often increases house prices. Interestingly, the effect of flood risk is predominantly associated with the post-2003 period which can be rationalized by changes in insurance practices and availability of detailed information on flood zones. Moreover, people in richer areas appear to better incorporate available flood risk data while people in poorer areas seem to associate flood risk with proximity to the water. Keywords: Floods; Real Estate; Housing; Household behaviour JEL Classification: D12, H31, Q54, R31 Proceedings: ERES2016 pp. xx-xx 1. Introduction Change and Risk - Issues for Property Valuation Floods and other major natural hazards have a far-reaching impact on the economies of work? affected regions. According to a 2015 study from the United Nations’ Food and Agriculture Organization1, natural disasters caused more than $1.5 trillion in damage 2 and 1.1 million deaths worldwide between 2003 and 2013. These numbers may yet get worse because of global warming that tends to increase the frequency and intensity of extreme weather events (Francis and Vavrus, 2012, Rahmstorf and Coumou, 2011, Douglas et al., 2010, Kazmierczak and Bichard, 2010, Thorne et al., 2007). -
Historical Notes Relating to Bideford's East-The-Water Shore.Odt
Historical Notes relating to Bideford's East-the-Water Shore A collection, in time-line form, of information pertaining primarily to the East-the-Water shore. Table of Contents Introduction....................................................................................................................................13 Nature of this document.............................................................................................................13 Development of this document...................................................................................................13 Prior to written records...................................................................................................................13 Prehistory...................................................................................................................................13 Stone Age, flint tools and Eastridge enclosure............................................................................14 Roman period, tin roads, transit camps, and the ford..................................................................15 A Roman transit camp between two crossings.......................................................................15 An ancient tin route?.............................................................................................................15 The old ford...........................................................................................................................15 Saxon period, fisheries (monks and forts?).................................................................................15