DOCSLIB.ORG

Adelink Multi-Criteria Analysis Summary Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Adelink Multi-Criteria Analysis Summary Report AdeLINK Multi-Criteria Analysis Summary Report 1 AdeLINK Multi-Criteria Analysis Summary Report Contents Executive Summary ...................................................................................................................... 1 1 Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 7 1.1 Project Overview ..................................................................................................................... 7 1.2 Report Structure ..................................................................................................................... 8 1.3 Determining Routes for Assessment ...................................................................................... 8 1.4 Routes Assessed .................................................................................................................... 10 2 Multi-Criteria Analysis ........................................................................................................ 20 2.1 Purpose of the Multi-Criteria Analysis .................................................................................. 20 2.2 How does the Multi-Criteria Analysis Work? ........................................................................ 21 2.3 MCA and AdeLINK Planning Process ..................................................................................... 23 2.4 AdeLINK Themes and Criteria ............................................................................................... 24 3 Context .............................................................................................................................. 25 3.1 Light Rail Networks ............................................................................................................... 25 3.2 Light Rail Corridor Typologies ............................................................................................... 26 3.3 Assumptions .......................................................................................................................... 28 Appendices ................................................................................................................................ 30 Appendix A: MCA Results and Summary Data ............................................................................. 31 Appendix B: MCA Route Option Commentary from Workshops ................................................... 59 © InfraPlan (Aust) Pty Ltd. 2016 The information contained in this document produced by InfraPlan (Aust) Pty Ltd is solely for the use of the Client (The Department of Transport, Planning and Infrastructure) for the purposes for which it has been prepared and InfraPlan (Aust) Pty Ltd undertakes no duty or accepts any responsibility to any third party who may rely on this document. All rights reserved. No sections or elements of this document may be removed from this document, reproduced, electronically stored or transmitted in any form without the written permission of InfraPlan (Aust) Pty Ltd. i AdeLINK Multi-Criteria Analysis Summary Report Executive Summary The following analysis was undertaken by InfraPlan Pty Ltd on the request of the Department of Planning, Transport and Infrastructure. The intent of this report is to provide a multi criteria analysis of several route options for the AdeLINK Tram network, including the routes as per the Integrated Transport and Land Use Plan (ITLUP), 2015. MCA processes are often applied by State Government Departments and Treasuries to assess project options. This report does not contain any modelling, or engineering data and as such the AdeLINK routes are only stated as potential options. AdeLINK has the potential to attract investment, boost economic growth and encourage urban renewal and jobs, and bring residents and visitors to the city centre. Providing high quality public transport services will also help drive market demand for residential development in the CBD, inner and middle metropolitan Adelaide. In 2013, the development of the Integrated Transport and Land Use Plan (ITLUP) involving 2,500 participants stated they support trams as a first priority (83% of inner and 78% of middle suburban residents). Planning for AdeLINK forms part of the overall electrification of public transport in Adelaide. The study comprises several key steps before concluding with a detailed business case for delivering the AdeLINK tram network (as shown in the diagram below). This is an essential process for establishing the rationale for funding options. The first step, an extensive multi-criteria assessment (MCA) process to assess route options, is now complete and contained in this report. It involved the testing of the original AdeLINK tram network against other potential routes identified in conjunction with Council officers through consultation and workshops. The MCA Summary Report summarises the routes assessed in the MCA, providing guidance as to the route options to be taken forward to the Design Labs and Community Open Days. The results are also presented as standalone studies for each corridor. Criteria are unweighted to comply with Infrastructure Australia requirements. It is important to note that the MCA is one step in the process, and will assist in determining the final preferred routes for AdeLINK. The next phase of the study involves Design Labs, which will explore the integration opportunities between land use, street attributes and tram corridor planning (e.g. station locations) with Council staff and the community. This will provide a framework for more detail planning of the tram lines including stop locations, and identifying constraints and opportunities that will inform the design of each corridor. Following the Design Labs, a number of studies will commence in February 2017 to model the urban development outcomes (patronage demand); develop the operation framework of the tram system, including potential stabling options; assessment of road traffic operations and integration with bus and train services; and potential road and track layouts, including the location and style of tram stops within an urban design framework. 1 AdeLINK Multi-Criteria Analysis Summary Report This ‘Summary Report’ provides an overview of the AdeLINK light rail project, outlines the Multi- Criteria Analysis (MCA) process, a summary of MCA results, as well as some of the project’s contextual framework. Multi-criteria decision making processes have become increasingly prominent in strategic decision making for investment opportunities across a broad range of projects, from environmental preservation, development, infrastructure delivery and so on. It involves a multi-stage process of specifying options to be assessed, defining key objectives/themes and criteria, choosing measures to be scored and choosing the best option to move forward with. For the AdeLINK light rail project, 5 themes, 19 criteria and 43 measures made up the MCA. This process is outlined in Figure 1 below. The original routes identified for the AdeLINK light rail network were prescribed in 2015 by the State Government in their ‘Integrated Transport and Land Use Plan’ (ITLUP) and have been public knowledge since. As a result, these corridors may have already formed a basis for local and state government policy reviews and changes, infrastructure investment and development. Therefore, these routes were each considered as options for their respective AdeLINK corridor MCA. To ascertain additional route options, planning officers and managers from each local government Council through which the ITLUP corridors passed were invited to attend an interactive workshop on 29 June 2016. Facilitated by the Project Team (InfraPlan and SA Government), the goal of the workshop was to come up with route alternatives in addition to the ITLUP route for the MCA. The details of the routes discussed at this workshop are provided in Appendix B of this report. Figure 1: Overview of the AdeLINK MCA process. A number of criteria and measures were developed in consultation with Council officers to assess the options. A subsequent analysis of these route options (provided in more detail in Appendix A and separate detailed reports) has concluded the following unweighted scores. Note: The MCA scores will not be used to inform the staging of the AdeLINK network. Each route score should only be used to compare other route options for that specific Link. 2 AdeLINK Multi-Criteria Analysis Summary Report EastLINK EastLINK Option A: Norwood Parade Option C: Hybrid Option, Option B: Magill Road (via ITLUP Route (via Rundle Road, Norwood Parade and upper Rundle Rd, Beulah Rd, Parade West, Norwood Magill Road (connecting via Sydenham Rd) Parade and Penfolds Road) Glynburn Road or other route) Total score 37 26 38 The score suggests that the Parade (original ITLUP option) is the preferred option west of Portrush Road. However, a hybrid option connecting upper Magill Road has greater merit. While Magill Road option scored the highest for development potential, with transit supportive land uses it has a high volume of competing traffic; more heritage and would impact cyclists. Option C makes the best of the development envelope on both routes; has significantly more development opportunity and therefore uplift than Option A and the highest patronage potential. Option C has a greater number of business along its route and a higher patronage potential (revenue). The Capital Cost of Options A and C are likely to be
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Progress in Rail Reform Inquiry Report
    Progress in Rail Reform Inquiry Report Report No. 6 5 August 1999 Commonwealth of Australia 1999 ISBN 0 646 33597 9 This work is subject to copyright. Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, the work may be reproduced in whole or in part for study or training purposes, subject to the inclusion of an acknowledgment of the source. Reproduction for commercial use or sale requires prior written permission from AusInfo. Requests and inquiries concerning reproduction and rights should be addressed to the Manager, Legislative Services, AusInfo, GPO Box 1920, Canberra, ACT, 2601. Publications Inquiries: Media and Publications Productivity Commission Locked Bag 2 Collins Street East Melbourne VIC 8003 Tel: (03) 9653 2244 Fax: (03) 9653 2303 Email: [email protected] General Inquiries: Tel: (03) 9653 2100 or (02) 6240 3200 An appropriate citation for this paper is: Productivity Commission 1999, Progress in Rail Reform, Inquiry report no. 6, AusInfo, Canberra. The Productivity Commission The Productivity Commission, an independent Commonwealth agency, is the Government’s principal review and advisory body on microeconomic policy and regulation. It conducts public inquiries and research into a broad range of economic and social issues affecting the welfare of Australians. The Commission’s independence is underpinned by an Act of Parliament. Its processes and outputs are open to public scrutiny and are driven by concern for the wellbeing of the community as a whole. Information on the Productivity Commission, its publications and its current work program can be found on the World Wide Web at www.pc.gov.au or by contacting Media and Publications on (03) 9653 2244.
    [Show full text]
  • Prospectlink MCA Detail Rep
    i © InfraPlan (Aust) Pty Ltd. 2016 The information contained in this document produced by InfraPlan (Aust) Pty Ltd is solely for the use of the Client for the purposes for which it has been prepared and InfraPlan (Aust) Pty Ltd undertakes no duty or accepts any responsibility to any third party who may rely on this document. All rights reserved. No sections or elements of this document may be removed from this document, reproduced, electronically stored or transmitted in any form without the written permission of InfraPlan (Aust) Pty Ltd. i Contents Report Structure .......................................................................................................................... 2 Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 3 1 Theme 1: Place-making and a vibrant city ......................................................................... 4 1.1 Corridor ability to support the 30 Year Plan vision for infill and corridor development ............ 5 1.1.1 Number of properties within the 600m corridor that have a ‘Capital Value: Site Value’ ratio of less than 1.3 ........................................................................................................ 5 1.1.2 Cubic metres of transit supportive zones and policy areas (urban corridor, regeneration and so on) that support increased development potential within 600m of the corridor .....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Industrial Land Study the City of Charles Sturt
    Quality Endorsed Company ISO 9002 Lic 6350 Standards Australia INDUSTRIAL LAND STUDY VOLUME 1 UNDER INSTRUCTIONS FROM THE CITY OF CHARLES STURT APRIL 2008 OUR REFERENCE: PA1566 R0089 Colliers International Consulting Services (SA) ABN 20 031 866 033 Level 10 Statewide House 99 Gawler Place Adelaide SA 5000 CHARLES STURT INDUSTRIAL LAND STUDY – APRIL 2008 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The City of Charles Sturt has around 560Ha of Industry zoned land in 22 separate precincts, scatted across much of its domain. It is over a decade since there was a comprehensive review of this zoning. This study is a precursor to such a review. It considers Charles Sturt’s industrial land stock through the prism of:- • its broader economic and development policy settings; • the Rezoning Assessment Framework established by the Metropolitan Adelaide Industrial Land Strategy; and • the development planning and other issues arising from this analysis and assessment. Industry’s economic contribution to the city is clearly important and must be protected. It provides both jobs for the local community and export income for the region, and it has the capacity to remain a vital part of the City’s economic make-up for the next generation and beyond. At the same time however, there are other strategic development planning drivers at work, including population policy and the looming shortage of residential land in metropolitan Adelaide over the next decade, which will result in ongoing pressure for new, higher density models of infill development. Some of this pressure will be on existing industrial land. Addressing both sides of this strategic equation will require that decisions about the ongoing role of industry in Charles Sturt’s economic and social fabric be made “on balance”.
    [Show full text]
  • Bus Rapid Transit Has Arrived
    BRTHandbook_p01_cover:BRTHandbook_p01 26/10/11 18:35 Page 1 A review of key developments 2011/12 Bus Rapid Transit Has Arrived • World’s longest system opens in Cambridge • Setting standards in Belfast • BRT for low-density suburbs • Ridership results from Adelaide • Achieving quality in ticketing and information Published by Supported by The Handbook BRTHandbook_p02-03_contents:BRTHandbook_p02-03 26/10/11 18:40 Page 2 BRTHandbook_p02-03_contents:BRTHandbook_p02-03 26/10/11 18:40 Page 3 Introduction. 3 The belated but successful opening of the Cambridgeshire Guided Busway has given a real shot in the arm to BRT in the UK, says Rik Thomas he mood of optimism at the BRTuk made being not that far short of a quarter to consultation on its ambitious three- conference in Cambridge in of a million in the first month alone. corridor network of BRT lines, and those are TSeptember was unmistakable. True, a But there was more to it than a bunch of just the projects that were discussed in very large part of this optimism was relieved Cambridgians, because it does detail by speakers at the Cambridge generated by politicians and officers at seem as if a significant number of green conference. Cambridgeshire County Council who, after shoots are about to burst through into the Last year the introduction to this annual a few weeks of tentatively sticking their sunlight more or less simultaneously in the review and handbook for BRTuk said: heads above the parapet once the CGB UK. BRT schemes in Luton and Hampshire “Overall the message is clear – BRT has a scheme opened in August, are now are, hopefully, within months of opening.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Transport Buildings of Metropolitan Adelaide
    AÚ¡ University of Adelaide t4 É .8.'ìt T PUBLIC TRANSPORT BUILDII\GS OF METROPOLTTAN ADELAIDE 1839 - 1990 A thesis submitted to the Faculty of Architecture and Planning in candidacy for the degree of Master of Architectural Studies by ANDREW KELT (û, r're ¡-\ ., r ¡ r .\ ¡r , i,,' i \ September 1990 ERRATA p.vl Ljne2}oBSERVATIONshouldreadOBSERVATIONS 8 should read Moxham p. 43 footnote Morham facilities p.75 line 2 should read line 19 should read available Labor p.B0 line 7 I-abour should read p. r28 line 8 Omit it read p.134 Iine 9 PerematorilY should PerernPtorilY should read droP p, 158 line L2 group read woulC p.230 line L wold should PROLOGUE SESQUICENTENARY OF PUBLIC TRANSPORT The one hundred and fiftieth anniversary of the establishment of public transport in South Australia occurred in early 1989, during the research for this thesis. The event passed unnoticed amongst the plethora of more noteworthy public occasions. Chapter 2 of this thesis records that a certain Mr. Sp"y, with his daily vanload of passengers and goods, started the first regular service operating between the City and Port Adelaide. The writer accords full credit to this unsung progenitor of the chain of events portrayed in the following pages, whose humble horse drawn char ò bancs set out on its inaugural joumey, in all probability on 28 January L839. lll ACKNO\ryLEDGMENTS I would like to record my grateful thanks to those who have given me assistance in gathering information for this thesis, and also those who have commented on specific items in the text.
    [Show full text]
  • 167 Bus Time Schedule & Line Route
    167 bus time schedule & line map 167 City View In Website Mode The 167 bus line (City) has 2 routes. For regular weekdays, their operation hours are: (1) City: 5:31 AM - 11:10 PM (2) Glenelg: 6:17 AM - 11:54 PM Use the Moovit App to ƒnd the closest 167 bus station near you and ƒnd out when is the next 167 bus arriving. Direction: City 167 bus Time Schedule 42 stops City Route Timetable: VIEW LINE SCHEDULE Sunday 9:00 AM - 11:01 PM Monday 5:31 AM - 11:10 PM Zone B Colley Tce - West side 15 Colley Terrace, Glenelg Tuesday 5:31 AM - 11:10 PM Stop 21B Anzac Hwy - North side Wednesday 5:31 AM - 11:10 PM 615 Anzac Highway, Glenelg Thursday 5:31 AM - 11:10 PM Stop 21A Anzac Hwy - North side Friday 5:31 AM - 11:10 PM 595 Anzac Highway, Glenelg Saturday 8:00 AM - 11:01 PM Stop 30 Tapleys Hill Rd - South West side 8 Fulton Street, Glenelg Stop 29T Tapleys Hill Rd - West side 61 Tapleys Hill Road, Glenelg North 167 bus Info Direction: City Stop 28T Tapleys Hill Rd - West side Stops: 42 81 Tapleys Hill Road, Glenelg North Trip Duration: 28 min Line Summary: Zone B Colley Tce - West side, Stop Stop 27T Tapleys Hill Rd - West side 21B Anzac Hwy - North side, Stop 21A Anzac Hwy - 2A Clovelly Avenue, Glenelg North North side, Stop 30 Tapleys Hill Rd - South West side, Stop 29T Tapleys Hill Rd - West side, Stop 28T Stop 26 Blackburn Rd - North side Tapleys Hill Rd - West side, Stop 27T Tapleys Hill Rd - 8 Leak Avenue, Glenelg North West side, Stop 26 Blackburn Rd - North side, Stop 25 Blackburn Ave - North East side, Stop 24 Blackburn Stop 25 Blackburn
    [Show full text]
  • SA Speed Survey Results 2008 Road Type Speed Limit Street Suburb
    SA Speed Survey Results 2008 Percentage Number of all of Percentage vehicles Vehicles Average of all exceeding Passing Speed of vehicles the speed during the all exceeding limit by Speed week of vehicles the speed more than Road Type Limit Street Suburb/Town sampling (km/h) limit 10km/h Adelaide local 50 Gilbertson Road Seacliff Park 3227 51.9 62.8 17.5 Adelaide local 50 Coorara Avenue Payneham South 18229 51.2 58.3 10.7 Adelaide local 50 Bermudez Crescent Paralowie 8342 49.8 50.5 10.1 Adelaide local 50 Hambledon Road Campbelltown 13400 49.8 49.4 8.9 Adelaide local 50 Main Street Beverley 6332 48.1 44.1 10.3 Adelaide local 50 Vincent Road Smithfield Plains 1541 46.1 36.1 9.3 Adelaide local 50 Northcote Street Kilburn 7988 45.1 29.0 5.1 Adelaide local 50 Charles Road Beverley 5462 41.8 20.9 4.3 Adelaide local 50 Adelaide Street Maylands 2873 42.1 20.8 2.2 Adelaide local 50 London Drive Salisbury East 7469 37.6 20.0 3.7 Adelaide local 50 Commercial Street Marleston 5349 38.6 19.1 3.2 Adelaide local 50 Archer Street North Adelaide 15525 43.2 18.6 1.5 Adelaide local 50 North Esplanade Glenelg North 11603 40.7 14.7 1.8 Adelaide local 50 Olive Avenue Broadview 2604 39.5 9.2 1.1 Adelaide local 50 Bowyer Street Rosewater 3375 37.4 5.6 0.7 Adelaide local 50 Andrew Avenue Salisbury East 1541 36.9 2.3 0.1 Adelaide local 50 Farrell Street Glenelg South 2231 33.5 2.2 0.2 Adelaide local 50 George Street Adelaide 6372 28.4 0.6 0.0 Adelaide collector 50 Scenic Way Hackham 7665 53.7 68.5 23.6 Adelaide collector 50 Perry Barr Road Hallett Cove 13996 51.3
    [Show full text]
  • South Road Upgrade (Torrens Road to River Torrens) Project Report
    South Road Upgrade (Torrens Road to River Torrens) Project Report Introduction What is this report? This document has been prepared to provide an overview of the findings of the South Road Planning Study to upgrade the section from Torrens Road to the River Torrens. The planning study has investigated a broad range of possible options. It has developed and assessed a concept design for the preferred option for this project as the next step in delivering Adelaide’s non‐stop north‐south corridor. This document is intended to inform residents, property owners and businesses, along with the general public, of the State Government’s plans for this significant piece of transport infrastructure. If you have further questions after reading this document, please contact the South Road Planning Study Team via the contact details provided on the last page of this booklet. Why does Adelaide need a North‐South Corridor? Through its Seven Strategic Priorities the South Australian Government has detailed its economic, social and environmental goals. They include creating a vibrant city, safe communities and healthy neighbourhoods, affordable places to live and growing advanced manufacturing. The transport system plays a critical role in achieving these goals. Adelaide’s transport system is, however, facing major challenges over the next 30 years, the most critical of these being the provision of safe and efficient transport options for Adelaide’s residents and businesses. Due to the projected growth of South Australia’s North‐South Corridor economy and population, additional demands will be placed on infrastructure, especially transport infrastructure. South Road is part of the National Land Transport Network through urban Adelaide and is the major north‐south traffic and freight route through Adelaide’s west.
    [Show full text]
  • Westlink MCA Detail Report
    i © InfraPlan (Aust) Pty Ltd. 2016 The information contained in this document produced by InfraPlan (Aust) Pty Ltd is solely for the use of the Client for the purposes for which it has been prepared and InfraPlan (Aust) Pty Ltd undertakes no duty or accepts any responsibility to any third party who may rely on this document. All rights reserved. No sections or elements of this document may be removed from this document, reproduced, electronically stored or transmitted in any form without the written permission of InfraPlan (Aust) Pty Ltd. i Contents Report Structure .......................................................................................................................... 2 Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 3 1 Theme 1: Place-making and a vibrant city ......................................................................... 5 1.1 Corridor ability to support the 30 Year Plan vision for infill and corridor development ............ 6 1.1.1 Number of properties within the 600m corridor that have a ‘Capital Value: Site Value’ ratio of less than 1.3 ........................................................................................................ 6 1.1.2 Cubic metres of transit supportive zones and policy areas (urban corridor, regeneration and so on) that support increased development potential within 600m of the corridor .....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Financial Cost of Transport in Adelaide
    Australasian Transport Research Forum 2013 Proceedings 2 - 4 October 2013, Brisbane, Australia Publication website: http://www.patrec.org/atrf.aspx The financial cost of transport in Adelaide: estimation and interpretation Dr David Bray1 1Adjunct Associate Professor, University of Queensland Email for correspondence: [email protected] Abstract An estimate is made of the total financial cost of transport in Adelaide in around 2007 based on the value of depreciable transport assets at the time and taking account of their economic lives, the cost of capital and annual operating and maintenance costs. Costs are identified separately for each public transport mode, various classes of public roads, traffic policing and various categories of road vehicle. The results show that private investment in road vehicles is three times the value of depreciable public assets. Private expenditure on owning and operating vehicles accounts for an even greater 85% share of the total average annual $7.0 billion financial cost (in December 2006 prices) of sustaining road and public transport in Adelaide. Nonetheless, the total financial cost to the government of providing public transport and road assets and services was substantial, at $0.43 billion and $0.63 billion respectively per annum. An associated indicative analysis estimates the cost of providing public transport in Australian capital cities to be around $10 billion per annum. A little over half of this cost is for capital related costs and the remainder for operations. Average annual investment of $1.5 billion is needed to replace life expired public transport assets. 1. Introduction Considerable assets are involved in the provision of urban transport.
    [Show full text]
  • Master Plan Chapter 11
    11 Services Infrastructure ADELAIDE AIRPORT / MASTER PLAN 2019 189 11.1. Introduction 11.2. Overview Services infrastructure is a key component of Adelaide Airport’s operations both now and into • Services infrastructure at Adelaide the future. It comprises the power, water, sewer, Airport will continue to expand to telecommunications and stormwater networks that service aviation and non-aviation related meet increases in demand across developments across the Airport Business District. the airport, arising from increased The reliability, efficiency and sustainability of these passenger movements and new networks and supply arrangements are the key developments. objectives for Adelaide Airport when planning for services infrastructure. AAL works closely with • Augmentation of the existing utility external utilities providers to ensure these essential networks will likely include: services are available to support the operation and – growth of the airport. Potential relocation of the 750 millimetre water main which transects the airport site – Expansion of networks to supply new areas of development – New services infrastructure to the Airport East Precinct Figure 11-1: Installed Solar Photovoltaics on Multi-Storey Car Park Roof 190 ADELAIDE AIRPORT / MASTER PLAN 2019 11.3. Recent Developments Improvements to the services infrastructure that have • Connection to the underground aquifers located been implemented since Master Plan 2014 include: along the southern boundary of the airport for use by the Terminal 1 cooling towers • Installation
    [Show full text]
  • REPORT of the REVIEW INTO PUBLIC TRANSPORT TICKETING COMPLIANCE and ENFORCEMENT MAY 2016 Disclaimer
    REPORT OF THE REVIEW INTO PUBLIC TRANSPORT TICKETING COMPLIANCE AND ENFORCEMENT MAY 2016 Disclaimer The information contained in this report is provided for general guidance and assistance only and is not intended as advice. You should make your own enquiries as to the appropriateness and suitability of the information provided. While every effort has been made to ensure the currency, accuracy or completeness of the content we endeavour to keep the content relevant and up to date and reserve the right to make changes as required. The Victorian Government, authors and presenters do not accept any liability to any person for the information (or the use of the information) which is provided or referred to in the report. Authorised by the Victorian Government Department of Economic Development, Jobs, Transport and Resources 1 Spring Street Melbourne Victoria 3000 Telephone (03) 9651 9999 May 2016 ISBN 978-1-925466-92-8 (Print) ISBN 978-1-925466-91-1 (pdf/online) © Copyright State of Victoria 2016 Except for any logos, emblems, trademarks, artwork and photography this document is made available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Australia licence. This document is also available in PDF and accessible Word format at economicdevelopment.vic.gov.au/transport/rail-and-roads/ public-transport REPORT OF THE REVIEW INTO PUBLIC TRANSPORT TICKETING COMPLIANCE AND ENFORCEMENT 3 CONTENTS Glossary and abbreviations 5 Report summary 8 Context 8 Current arrangements for fare compliance and enforcement 10 Behavioural aspects of fare evasion
    [Show full text]