DOCSLIB.ORG

The Birth of Fascist Ideology

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Birth of Fascist Ideology THE BIRTH OF FASCIST IDEOLOGY Zeev Sternhell with Mario Sznajder and Maia Asheri THE BIRTH OF FASCIST IDEOLOGY FROM CULTURAL REBELLION TO POLITICAL REVOLUTION Translated by David Maisel PRINCETON UNIVERSITY PRESS PRINCETON, NEW JERSEY Copyright 1994 by Princeton University Press Translated from Zeev Sternhell, with Mario Sznajder and Maia Asheri, Naissance de l’idéologie fasciste. Copyright 1989 Librairie Arthème Fayard, Paris Published by Princeton University Press, 41 William Street, Princeton, New Jersey 08540 In the United Kingdom: Princeton University Press, Chichester, West Sussex All Rights Reserved Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Sternhell, Zeev. [Naissance de l’idéologie fasciste. English] The birth of fascist ideology : from cultural rebellion to political revolution / Zeev Sternhell, with Mario Sznajder and Maia Asheri : translated by David Maisel. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 0-691-03289-0 ISBN 0-691-04486-4 (pbk.) 1. Fascism—Europe—History. I. Sznajder, Mario. II. Asheri, Maia. III. Title. D726.5.S7413 1994 320.5′33′094—dc20 93-17629 CIP This book has been composed in Bitstream Caledonia Princeton University Press books are printed on acid-free paper and meet the guidelines for permanence and durability of the Committee on Production Guidelines for Book Longevity of the Council on Library Resources Third printing, and first paperback printing, 1995 Printed in the United States of America 357910864 To the memory of Jacob L. Talmon Contents Acknowledgments ix Introduction Fascism as an Alternative Political Culture 3 Chapter One Georges Sorel and the Antimaterialist Revision of Marxism 36 The Foundations of the “Correction” of Marxism 36 Antirationalism and Activism: The Social Myths 55 Anti-Cartesianism and Pessimism 71 The Junction of Sorelianism and Nationalism 78 Chapter Two Revolutionary Revisionism in France 92 The “New School” 92 Applied Sorelianism 99 The Emergence of Socialist Nationalism 118 Chapter Three Revolutionary Syndicalism in Italy 131 Twenty Years: 1902–1922 131 The Primacy of Economics and the Revision of Marxist Economic Doctrine 143 Sorel, the Mobilizing Myth of the Revolutionary General Strike, and the Lessons of Reality 152 Chapter Four The Socialist-National Synthesis 160 The Myth of the Revolutionary War 160 From the Libyan War to the Interventionism of the Left: The Imperialism of the Workers, the Syndicate, and the Nation 163 National Syndicalism, the Productionist Solution, and the Program of Partial Expropriation 177 From the Carta del Carnaro to Fascist Syndicalism 186 Chapter Five The Mussolini Crossroads: From the Critique of Marxism to National Socialism and Fascism 195 Within the Orbit of Revolutionary Syndicalism 195 viii CONTENTS The Intellectual Realignment of a Socialist Militant 206 National Socialism 215 The State and Dictatorship: From National Socialism to Fascism 227 Epilogue From a Cultural Rebellion to a Political Revolution 233 Notes 259 Bibliography 315 Index 327 Acknowledgments THIS WORK is an expanded and improved version of a book published in France in 1989 and represents the results of an inquiry begun several years ago. It is also some time since several Ph.D. students in the history and political science departments of the Hebrew University in Jerusalem, whose work I had the privilege of supervising, began to interest themselves in the growth of Fascist ideology. In so doing, some of these young scholars came to investigate certain paths I had indicated in previous works. This applied particularly to the process of transition of the Left toward fascism. Some of these studies have now come to fruition. Two of them have been incorporated into this book, to which each brings its own contribution. Chapters 3 and 4 are by Mario Sznajder, a specialist in Italian revolutionary syndicalism. Only a concern for presentation and a desire to offer the reader an integrated text caused me to revise their structure. Most of the material that enabled me to write Chapter 5 was provided by Maia Asheri, who has completed a study of early Italian fascism. Thus, many of the qualities this work may possess can be ascribed to my collaborators, but since the intellec- tual responsibility for the book and its general conception is mine, I am prepared to take the blame for its weaknesses. As in all such cases in the last eighteen years, this book has benefited from the assistance of Georges Bensimhon. Whether it is a matter of essential problems or of the French language, Georges Benshimon has allowed no omission, no obscurity to pass him by. My gratitude toward this friend far exceeds anything I am able to express in these few lines. The initial idea for this book took shape in my mind in 1983–1984, when I was a member of the Institute for Advanced Study in Princeton, New Jersey. The book progressed at Columbia University, where I spent profit- able months in the summer of 1986, and two years later, thanks to an invita- tion from the French government, I enjoyed an especially rewarding period of work in Paris. The main part of the work, however, was carried out in 1986–1987 at the Institute for Advanced Studies at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem. My acknowledgments are due to its director, Menachem Yaari, and to the whole administrative staff headed by Shabtai Gairon and Bilha Gus. The invitation to pass a year in this center of research relieved me of my teaching responsibilities and allowed me to devote myself entirely to the preparation of this book. Our seminar of multidisciplinary research, in which Amatzia Baram, Sana Hassan, Menachem Friedman, George Mosse, Emmanuel Sivan, Michael Walzer, and Jay Winter in particular took part, was a source of great enrichment for me. As an assistant to this group, Anat x ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Banine could not be faulted. Most of the reading and writing for the English edition of this book was done during the year 1991–1992, which I was happy to spend at the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars in Wash- ington, D.C. I want to thank the center’s director, Charles Blitzer, and the director of fellowships, Ann Sheffield, for providing me with the opportunity to work in an outstanding intellectual environment and make the best use of my time. Special thanks are due to the staffs of the following libraries: the National and University Library in Jerusalem, the Bibliothèque Nationale in Paris, the Italian National Libraries and Archives in Rome, the libraries of the universities of Columbia and Princeton, and the Library of Congress. I am grateful to the S. A. Schonbrunn Foundation and the Leonard Davis Institute for International Relations at the Hebrew University for the finan- cial assistance I received in most stages of my work on this book. My final thanks go to David Maisel for an excellent translation, to Lauren M. Osborne, Editor, History and Classics, for her good advice along the way, and to Dalia Geffen for her skills and devotion in editing the manuscript. —Jerusalem, Fall 1992 THE BIRTH OF FASCIST IDEOLOGY INTRODUCTION Fascism as an Alternative Political Culture THIS BOOK is based on two assumptions. The first is that fascism, before it became a political force, was a cultural phenomenon. The growth of fascism would not have been possible without the revolt against the Enlightenment and the French Revolution which swept across Europe at the end of the nineteenth century and the beginning of the twentieth. Everywhere in Eu- rope, the cultural revolt preceded the political; the rise of the Fascist move- ments and the Fascist seizure of power in Italy became possible only be- cause of the conjunction of the accumulated influence of that cultural and intellectual revolution with the political, social, and psychological conditions that came into being at the end of the First World War. In that sense, fas- cism was only an extreme manifestation of a much broader and more comprehensive phenomenon. The second assumption, which follows from the first, is that in the devel- opment of fascism, its conceptual framework played a role of special impor- tance. There can be no doubt that the crystallization of ideology preceded the buildup of political power and laid the groundwork for political action. Fascism was not, in Benedetto Croce’s famous expression, a “parenthesis” in contemporary history. It was not, as he thought, the result of an “infection,” of a period of “decline in the consciousness of liberty” following the First World War.1 It was not the product of some kind of “Machiavellian” renais- sance to which twentieth-century Europe fell victim. Contrary to what Friedrich Meinecke and Gerhard Ritter have sought to convince the genera- tion after the Second World War, fascism was an integral part of the history of European culture.2 Similarly, fascism was not a sort of shadow cast by Marxism, as claimed by Ernst Nolte, whose brilliant and well-known book continues the work of Meinecke and Ritter. One should also not exaggerate the “anti” quality of fascism; fascism was not only a form of antiliberalism (to use the expression of Juan Linz, the writer of a remarkable study). Nor was fascism a “variety of Marxism,” as claimed by A. James Gregor, a normally perspicacious scholar and the author of major works.3 Moreover, fascism cannot be reduced, as the classical Marxist interpretation would have it, to a simple antiproletarian reaction that took place at a stage of declining capitalism.4 Between these two extremes is an abundance of interpretations. With regard to the schol- 4 INTRODUCTION arly publications of the last twenty years, the reader should refer to the work of Karl Dietrich Bracher, Emilio Gentile, A. James Gregor, Roger Griffin, Pierre Milza, George L. Mosse, Stanley G. Payne, Fritz Stern, Domenico Settembrini, Jacob Leib Talmon, and Pier Giorgio Zunino.5 In Interpretations of Fascism, the highly respected doyen of Italian schol- ars, Renzo De Felice, has given us a survey of different interpretations de- serving of mention.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Chapter One: Introduction
    CHANGING PERCEPTIONS OF IL DUCE TRACING POLITICAL TRENDS IN THE ITALIAN-AMERICAN MEDIA DURING THE EARLY YEARS OF FASCISM by Ryan J. Antonucci Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts in the History Program YOUNGSTOWN STATE UNIVERSITY August, 2013 Changing Perceptions of il Duce Tracing Political Trends in the Italian-American Media during the Early Years of Fascism Ryan J. Antonucci I hereby release this thesis to the public. I understand that this thesis will be made available from the OhioLINK ETD Center and the Maag Library Circulation Desk for public access. I also authorize the University or other individuals to make copies of this thesis as needed for scholarly research. Signature: Ryan J. Antonucci, Student Date Approvals: Dr. David Simonelli, Thesis Advisor Date Dr. Brian Bonhomme, Committee Member Date Dr. Martha Pallante, Committee Member Date Dr. Carla Simonini, Committee Member Date Dr. Salvatore A. Sanders, Associate Dean of Graduate Studies Date Ryan J. Antonucci © 2013 iii ABSTRACT Scholars of Italian-American history have traditionally asserted that the ethnic community’s media during the 1920s and 1930s was pro-Fascist leaning. This thesis challenges that narrative by proving that moderate, and often ambivalent, opinions existed at one time, and the shift to a philo-Fascist position was an active process. Using a survey of six Italian-language sources from diverse cities during the inauguration of Benito Mussolini’s regime, research shows that interpretations varied significantly. One of the newspapers, Il Cittadino Italo-Americano (Youngstown, Ohio) is then used as a case study to better understand why events in Italy were interpreted in certain ways.
    [Show full text]
  • Italian Fascism Between Ideology and Spectacle
    Fast Capitalism ISSN 1930-014X Volume 1 • Issue 2 • 2005 doi:10.32855/fcapital.200502.014 Italian Fascism between Ideology and Spectacle Federico Caprotti In April 1945, a disturbing scene was played out at a petrol station in Piazzale Loreto, in central Milan. Mussolini’s body was displayed for all to see, hanging upside down, together with those of other fascists and of Claretta Petacci, his mistress. Directly, the scene showed the triumph of the partisans, whose efforts against the Nazis had greatly accelerated the liberation of the North of Italy. The Piazzale Loreto scene was both a victory sign and a reprisal. Nazis and fascists had executed various partisans and displayed their bodies in the same place earlier in the war. Indirectly, the scene was a symbolic reversal of what had until then been branded as historical certainty. Piazzale Loreto was a public urban spectacle aimed at showing the Italian people that fascism had ended. The Duce was now displayed as a gruesome symbol of defeat in the city where fascism had first developed. More than two decades of fascism were symbolically overcome through a barbaric catharsis. The concept of spectacle has been applied to Italian fascism (Falasca-Zamponi 2000) in an attempt to conceptualize and understand the relationship between fascist ideology and its external manifestations in the public, symbolic, aesthetic, and urban spheres. This paper aims to further develop the concept of fascism as a society of spectacle by elaborating a geographical understanding of Italian fascism as a material phenomenon within modernity. Fascism is understood as an ideological construct (on which the political movement was based) which was expressed in the symbolic and aesthetic realm; its symbolism and art however are seen as having been rooted in material, historical specificity.
    [Show full text]
  • A Historiography of Fascism
    History in the Making Volume 6 Article 5 2013 A Historiography of Fascism Glenn-Iain Steinback CSUSB Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.lib.csusb.edu/history-in-the-making Part of the Political History Commons Recommended Citation Steinback, Glenn-Iain (2013) "A Historiography of Fascism," History in the Making: Vol. 6 , Article 5. Available at: https://scholarworks.lib.csusb.edu/history-in-the-making/vol6/iss1/5 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the History at CSUSB ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in History in the Making by an authorized editor of CSUSB ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Articles History Department’s 2013 Faculty Choice Award A Historiography of Fascism By Glenn-Iain Steinback Abstract: A long-standing historical debate revolves around the definition, fundamental nature and historical constraints of the concept of fascism. A wide array of scholarly questions about the political and ideological nature of fascism, the minimum or necessary traits of a fascist movement, arguments over the classification of semi-fascist groups and the concept of generic fascism characterize this debate. The result is a substantial body of scholarly research replete with competing theories for the evolution and origin of fascism as a concept, of individual fascist movements and even over the geographic and temporal application of the term itself within history. This paper is a historiography of fascist studies that illuminates the development of the scholarly narrative and understanding of fascism. Beginning with the historically contemporary Marxist perceptive of fascism, this paper examines competing and complimentary understandings of the phenomenon across the twentieth century, including various theories for the evolution of fascism in Europe, the relationship to and placement of fascism in the broader political spectrum, and the debate over fascism as a form of political religion.
    [Show full text]
  • ESS9 Appendix A3 Political Parties Ed
    APPENDIX A3 POLITICAL PARTIES, ESS9 - 2018 ed. 3.0 Austria 2 Belgium 4 Bulgaria 7 Croatia 8 Cyprus 10 Czechia 12 Denmark 14 Estonia 15 Finland 17 France 19 Germany 20 Hungary 21 Iceland 23 Ireland 25 Italy 26 Latvia 28 Lithuania 31 Montenegro 34 Netherlands 36 Norway 38 Poland 40 Portugal 44 Serbia 47 Slovakia 52 Slovenia 53 Spain 54 Sweden 57 Switzerland 58 United Kingdom 61 Version Notes, ESS9 Appendix A3 POLITICAL PARTIES ESS9 edition 3.0 (published 10.12.20): Changes from previous edition: Additional countries: Denmark, Iceland. ESS9 edition 2.0 (published 15.06.20): Changes from previous edition: Additional countries: Croatia, Latvia, Lithuania, Montenegro, Portugal, Slovakia, Spain, Sweden. Austria 1. Political parties Language used in data file: German Year of last election: 2017 Official party names, English 1. Sozialdemokratische Partei Österreichs (SPÖ) - Social Democratic Party of Austria - 26.9 % names/translation, and size in last 2. Österreichische Volkspartei (ÖVP) - Austrian People's Party - 31.5 % election: 3. Freiheitliche Partei Österreichs (FPÖ) - Freedom Party of Austria - 26.0 % 4. Liste Peter Pilz (PILZ) - PILZ - 4.4 % 5. Die Grünen – Die Grüne Alternative (Grüne) - The Greens – The Green Alternative - 3.8 % 6. Kommunistische Partei Österreichs (KPÖ) - Communist Party of Austria - 0.8 % 7. NEOS – Das Neue Österreich und Liberales Forum (NEOS) - NEOS – The New Austria and Liberal Forum - 5.3 % 8. G!LT - Verein zur Förderung der Offenen Demokratie (GILT) - My Vote Counts! - 1.0 % Description of political parties listed 1. The Social Democratic Party (Sozialdemokratische Partei Österreichs, or SPÖ) is a social above democratic/center-left political party that was founded in 1888 as the Social Democratic Worker's Party (Sozialdemokratische Arbeiterpartei, or SDAP), when Victor Adler managed to unite the various opposing factions.
    [Show full text]
  • Racial Exclusion and Italian Identity Construction Through Citizenship Law
    L’Altro in Italia: Racial Exclusion and Italian Identity Construction through Citizenship Law Ariel Gizzi An Honors Thesis for the Department of International Relations Tufts University, 2018 ii Acknowledgements Over the course of this thesis, I received academic and personal support from various professors and scholars, including but not limited to: Cristina Pausini, Kristina Aikens, Anne Moore, Consuelo Cruz, Medhin Paolos, Lorgia García Peña, David Art, Richard Eichenberg, and Lisa Lowe. I also want to mention the friends and fellow thesis writers with whom I passed many hours in the library: Joseph Tsuboi, Henry Jani, Jack Ronan, Ian James, Francesca Kamio, and Tashi Wangchuk. Most importantly, this thesis could not have happened without the wisdom and encouragement of Deirdre Judge. Deirdre and I met in October of my senior year, when I was struggling to make sense of what I was even trying to write about. With her guidance, I set deadlines for myself, studied critical theory, and made substantial revisions to each draft I produced. She is truly a remarkable scholar and mentor who I know will accomplish great things in her life. And lastly, thank you to my parents, who have always supported me in every academic and personal endeavor, most of which are related in some way or another to Italy. Grazie. iii Table of Contents Chapter 1: Introduction………………………………………………………….1 Chapter 2: Theoretical Frameworks …………………………………………….6 Chapter 3: Liberal Italy………………………………………………………….21 Chapter 4: Colonial and Fascist Italy……………………………………………44 Chapter 5: Postwar Italy…………………………………………………………60 Chapter 6: Contemporary Italy…………………………………………………..77 Chapter 7: Conclusion…………………………………………………………...104 Chapter 8: Bibliography…………………………………………………………112 1 Chapter 1: Introduction My maternal grandfather, Giuseppe Gizzi, was born and raised in Ariano Irpino, Italy.
    [Show full text]
  • Page 540 H-France Review Vol. 9 (October 2009), No. 129 Samuel
    H-France Review Volume 9 (2009) Page 540 H-France Review Vol. 9 (October 2009), No. 129 Samuel Kalman, The Extreme Right in Interwar France: The Faisceau and the Croix de Feu. Hampshire and Burlington, VT: Ashgate, 2008. x+ 265 pp. Bibliography and index. $99.95 U.S. (cl). ISBN 978-0-7546- 6240-2. Review by Samual Huston Goodfellow, Westminster College. One of the greatest challenges in writing about fascism and the right in the interwar era is the problem of definition. What is fascism? How is it different from the extreme right or even conservatism? Is fascism an outgrowth of the left? The impulse towards differentiation, although it has its purposes, obscures the messy reality of the bundle of political and social organizations that operated on the right. Lack of a clear foundational ideology, the moral taint associated with fascism, and the often experimental quality of these new movements further complicate the task of creating clear categories. Samuel Kalman sidesteps many of these questions by resorting to a different terminology. Instead of dwelling on the now stale question of whether the Faisceau or the Croix de Feu/ Parti Social Français (CdF/PSF) was, or was not, fascist, Kalman simply refers to them as part of the extreme right and chooses to focus instead on the strands that ran through the groups as well as on the internecine struggles within the groups. This is not a book about the definitional purity of the term fascism or even the extreme right, but about two issues: the linkages over time and across issues and the discord within movements.
    [Show full text]
  • The Poverty of Philosophy and Its Contemporary Relevance
    Crisis, Revolution, and the Meaning of Progress: The Poverty of Philosophy and its Contemporary Relevance Michael Joseph Roberto Proudhon and Marx ABSTRACT: In 1847, Marx wrote The Poverty of Philosophy, his polemical response to Pierre Joseph Proudhon’s System of Economical Contradictions Or, The Philosophy of Poverty, published a year earlier. Marx and Proudhon were the principal antagonists in the struggle for influence and control of the emerging European workers movement then fueled by the first great crisis of modern capitalism. While Marx propagated communist revolution as a solution to the crisis, Proudhon sought to preserve “good capitalism” by attempting to formulate a new political economy that would reconcile contradictions of capitalist exchange by means of reciprocal agreements and transactions; in a word, mutualism. In The Poverty of Philosophy, Marx took Proudhon to task for creating a massive “dialectical phantasmagoria” in the System of Economical Contradictions. Usually regarded as his first detailed treatment of political economy, Marx’s book also contains an implicit conception of social and historical progress based on the principles of contradiction, paradox, and Copyright © 2009 by Michael Joseph Roberto and Cultural Logic, ISSN 1097-3087 Michael Joseph Roberto 2 practice. Today, as the U.S. experiences an irreversible and possibly terminal capitalist crisis, Marx’s polemic against Proudhon remains instructive as an historical, theoretical, and practical-political guide. Key features of the Marx- Proudhon divide in the 1840s are now being recast in contemporary guises and forms. The Left must distinguish between revolutionary Marxist solutions and variations of the New Proudhonism. While Marxism holds the potential for revolutionary, socialist transformation and renewed social progress, the New Proudhonism seeks to save “good capitalism” – ironically and tragically, carrying with it the plausibility of a more coercive and barbarous system.
    [Show full text]
  • Salgado Munoz, Manuel (2019) Origins of Permanent Revolution Theory: the Formation of Marxism As a Tradition (1865-1895) and 'The First Trotsky'
    Salgado Munoz, Manuel (2019) Origins of permanent revolution theory: the formation of Marxism as a tradition (1865-1895) and 'the first Trotsky'. Introductory dimensions. MRes thesis. http://theses.gla.ac.uk/74328/ Copyright and moral rights for this work are retained by the author A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge This work cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the author The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the author When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given Enlighten: Theses https://theses.gla.ac.uk/ [email protected] Origins of permanent revolution theory: the formation of Marxism as a tradition (1865-1895) and 'the first Trotsky'. Introductory dimensions Full name of Author: Manuel Salgado Munoz Any qualifications: Sociologist Submitted in fulfillment of the requirements of the Degree of Master of Research School of Social & Political Sciences, Sociology Supervisor: Neil Davidson University of Glasgow March-April 2019 Abstract Investigating the period of emergence of Marxism as a tradition between 1865 and 1895, this work examines some key questions elucidating Trotsky's theoretical developments during the first decade of the XXth century. Emphasizing the role of such authors like Plekhanov, Johann Baptists von Schweitzer, Lenin and Zetkin in the developing of a 'Classical Marxism' that served as the foundation of the first formulation of Trotsky's theory of permanent revolution, it treats three introductory dimensions of this larger problematic: primitive communism and its feminist implications, the debate on the relations between the productive forces and the relations of production, and the first apprehensions of Marx's economic mature works.
    [Show full text]
  • Alceste De Ambris Dall'interventismo All'esilio
    Alceste De Ambris dall’interventismo all’esilio (1914-1934) Enrico Serventi Longhi La figura di Alceste De Ambris è stata studiata ed è conosciuta da diversi ricercatori, studiosi o appassionati di storia. La sua vicenda biografica lo vede protagonista della politica rivoluzionaria e non solo dei primi trentenni del novecento; nato a Licciana di Pontremoli (Massa) il 15 settembre 1874, il suo nome è legato a due episodi celebri: lo sciopero generale dei contadini a Parma nel maggio 1908 e la collaborazione con Gabriele D’Annunzio a Fiume – Rijeka nel 1920. Esperienze profondamente diverse per fini, caratteri ideologici e sviluppi organizzativi, testimoni di una indiscutibile trasformazione, comune del resto alla generazione degli interventisti di sinistra. La guerra fu un momento di rottura fra la tradizione riformistica, parlamentare, persino evangelica, del socialismo italiano ufficiale e parte della nuova generazione di giovani rivoluzionari. In tale ottica ho ritenuto opportuno segnare come inizio simbolico dell’indagine analitica il discorso interventista di De Ambris pronunciato nell’agosto 1914; la guerra rappresenta senza dubbio il determinante momento di rottura del sindacalista di Licciana con il movimento operaio e libertario, sebbene insieme preceduto dall’avvicinamento alle posizioni antigermaniche del sindacalismo rivoluzionario francese e dalla fondamentale esperienza politica ed esistenziale nel Ticino1. La tesi di dottorato nasce con lo specifico intento di mettere in luce la travagliata esperienza del sindacalista aprano e, allo stesso tempo non sottovalutando lo studio prosopografico dei gruppi con cui entra in contatto e collabora. Il taglio biografico può permettere di entrare in profondità nel dibattito, nelle fratture, nelle riorganizzazioni, nelle affermazioni e nelle sconfitte delle diverse scuole della sinistra rivoluzionaria italiana sorte dalla campagna antimilitarista e dall’interventismo rivoluzionario e democratico.
    [Show full text]
  • Fifteen Years of the Communist Party
    University of Central Florida STARS PRISM: Political & Rights Issues & Social Movements 1-1-1934 Fifteen years of the Communist Party Alex Bittelman Find similar works at: https://stars.library.ucf.edu/prism University of Central Florida Libraries http://library.ucf.edu This Book is brought to you for free and open access by STARS. It has been accepted for inclusion in PRISM: Political & Rights Issues & Social Movements by an authorized administrator of STARS. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Recommended Citation Bittelman, Alex, "Fifteen years of the Communist Party" (1934). PRISM: Political & Rights Issues & Social Movements. 260. https://stars.library.ucf.edu/prism/260 IY ALEX BITIELMAN 10c REPORTS, SPEECHES AND DECISIONS of the Historic IJTH PLENUM •I tll• Executive Committee of the COMMUNIST INTERNATIONAL • Theses and Decisions, Thirtaellth Plenum of the E.C.C.I. • . • . • • . .OS Fascism,• the Danger of War and the Tasks of the Communist Parties a.port b')I ICUUSINEN .••• , . • . • . • . • • • . .10 We are Fighting for a Soviet Germany Rqorl b')I WILHELM Plli:CK, Sccrd•ry of th• Co"'''""''" Po-rty of Gc1'11'411'JI . • . • • . • . • . • . .to The Comm.Dist Parties in th.e Fight for the Masses Ste.ch by 0. PlATNITSICY • • . • • . .10 Revolutionary Crisis, Fascism and War S'ucb by D. Z. HANUILSJCY • • • • • • • . .OS Fascism, Social Democracy and the Communists Stucb by V. KNORIN, lfr"'b'r of tbe B.C.C.I. .10 .Revolutionary China Today Sp-.cb by WAN MING tutti KANG SIN . .10 ffhe Revolutionary Struggle of the Toiling Masses of Japan Sp1uu:b by OKANO, Jato. , . • . • . .OS • Ortln- fr01'1 WORKERS LIBRARY PUBLISHERS P.O.
    [Show full text]
  • Consensus for Mussolini? Popular Opinion in the Province of Venice (1922-1943)
    UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM SCHOOL OF HISTORY AND CULTURES Department of History PhD in Modern History Consensus for Mussolini? Popular opinion in the Province of Venice (1922-1943) Supervisor: Prof. Sabine Lee Student: Marco Tiozzo Fasiolo ACADEMIC YEAR 2016-2017 2 University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. Declaration I certify that the thesis I have presented for examination for the PhD degree of the University of Birmingham is solely my own work other than where I have clearly indicated that it is the work of others (in which case the extent of any work carried out jointly by me and any other person is clearly identified in it). The copyright of this thesis rests with the author. Quotation from it is permitted, provided that full acknowledgement is made. This thesis may not be reproduced without my prior written consent. I warrant that this authorisation does not, to the best of my belief, infringe the rights of any third party. I declare that my thesis consists of my words. 3 Abstract The thesis focuses on the response of Venice province population to the rise of Fascism and to the regime’s attempts to fascistise Italian society.
    [Show full text]
  • Waiting for War: Portugal, Spain, Italy and Greece, 1914-1918 FILIPE RIBEIRO DE MENESES *
    Comunicação & Cultura, n.º 16, 2013, pp. 31-46 Waiting for war: Portugal, Spain, Italy and Greece, 1914-1918 FILIPE RIBEIRO DE MENESES * In his Modern Spain 1875-1980, Raymond Carr wrote that “in all countries of Southern and Eastern Europe the strains imposed by the Great War of 1914- 1918 proved too great for democratic and quasi-democratic regimes.”1 While undoubtedly true, these words should not be read to mean that the war was nec- essarily a catastrophe imposed by the Great Powers on these countries: Many within them saw the generalized European war – the result of the existing alliance system which turned an Austrian-Serbian dispute into something very different – as a unique historic opportunity to be seized in order to pursue concrete, often expansionist, goals. Interventionism, in other words, was a policy choice freely pursued. When the First World War began officially, on 28 July 1914, the countries of southern Europe were by no means unaccustomed to armed conflict. Whether in the colonial sphere (in the cases of Portugal, Spain, and Italy) or against one or more European powers (in the cases of Italy and Greece), all four of the coun- tries covered in this article had recently been engaged in sometimes defensive, but more often than not aggressive, military action – so much so that the chronologi- cal limits of the First World War are beginning, in the opinion of many historians – to fray at the edges, not because of actions undertaken by the Great Powers, but because of the activities undertaken by their southern neighbours.2 All four _______________ * Professor at the National University of Ireland, Maynooth.
    [Show full text]