Every Child's Right to Be Heard

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Every Child's Right to Be Heard every child’s right to be heard A RESOURCE GUIDE ON THE UN COMMITTEE ON THE RIGHTS OF THE CHILD GENERAL COMMENT NO.12 GERISON LANSDOWN Save the Children is the world’s leading independent children’s rights organisation, with members in 29 countries and operational programmes in more than 120. We fight for children’s rights and deliver lasting improvements to children’s lives worldwide. Published by Save the Children UK on behalf of Save the Children and UNICEF. Save the Children UK 1 St John’s Lane London EC1M 4AR UK +44 (0)20 7012 6400 savethechildren.org.uk First published 2011 © The Save the Children Fund 2011 The Save the Children Fund is a charity registered in England and Wales (213890) and Scotland (SC039570). Registered Company No. 178159 This publication is copyright, but may be reproduced by any method without fee or prior permission for teaching purposes, but not for resale. For copying in any other circumstances, prior written permission must be obtained from the publisher, and a fee may be payable. Cover photo: Children watch a performance by fellow students at a school in El Oro, Ecuador. (Photo: Edward Naranjo and Maruska Bonilla/Save the Children) Typeset by Grasshopper Design Company CONTENTS Foreword vi Acknowledgements viii Abbreviations ix INTRODUCTION 1 Key to boxes and symbols 2 CHAPTER ONE SETTING THE CONTEXT 3 Background 3 Why listening to children is important 5 Participation contributes to personal development 5 Participation leads to better decision-making and outcomes 5 Participation serves to protect children 7 Participation contributes to preparation for civil society development, tolerance and respect for others 9 Participation strengthens accountability 9 Addressing the arguments against children’s participation 12 CHAPTER two LEGAL ANALYSIS OF ARTICLE 12 19 Article 12 para 1 19 Assuring the right to express views 19 Every child capable of forming his or her own views 20 The right to express views freely 22 The right to express views on all matters affecting them 22 The obligation to give due weight in accordance with age and maturity 23 Article 12 para 2 24 The right to be heard in judicial or administrative proceedings 24 The right to be heard directly or through a representative body 24 Representation in a manner consistent with procedural rules of national law 26 CHAPTER THREE ARTICLE 12 AND LINKS WITH OTHER ARTICLES IN THE UNCRC 31 General principles 31 Articles 12 and 2 31 Articles 12 and 3 32 Articles 12 and 6 34 Civil rights and freedoms 35 Articles 12 and 13 35 Articles 12 and 14 35 Articles 12 and 15 35 Articles 12 and 16 36 Articles 12 and 17 36 Evolving capacity and the exercise of rights 36 Articles 12 and 5 36 iii EVERY CHILD’S RIGHT to BE HEARD CHAPTER FOUR OVERARCHING MEASURES FOR IMPLEMENTING ARTICLE 12 41 1. Review and withdraw restrictive declarations and reservations to Article 12 41 2. Introduce legislation 41 3. Establish independent human rights institutions 41 4. Provide training on Article 12 for all relevant professionals 41 5. Ensure appropriate conditions for enabling children to express views 44 6. Combat negative attitudes 46 CHAPTER FIVE OBLIGATIONS RELATING TO JUDICIAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS 51 General steps to be taken in all proceedings 51 Preparation 51 The hearing 52 Assessment of the capacity of the child 55 Feedback on the weight given to the views of the child 57 Complaints, remedies and redress 57 Obligations relating to specific proceedings 63 Divorce and separation 63 Separation from parents and alternative care 65 Adoption and kafalah of Islamic law 67 The child offender 67 Child victims and child witnesses 71 Immigration and asylum proceedings 76 CHAPTER SIX IMPLEMENTING ARTICLE 12 IN DIFFERENT SETTINGS 81 In the family 81 Support and guidance for parents 82 Parental responsibilities and the law 85 In alternative care 85 Legal right to be involved in individual decisions relating to all aspects of the care system 86 Legal right to be consulted in the development of care services 87 Access to information 88 Independent and safe complaints mechanisms 88 Independent inspectorate 88 Independent monitoring body 88 Consultative mechanisms 88 In healthcare 92 Involvement in decision-making 92 Access to confidential medical counselling 94 Consent to treatment 96 Participation in the development of health services 98 iv CONTENTS In education 100 Involvement of children in individual decisions affecting their education 100 Participatory child-centred learning 102 Democratic school environments 102 Participation in education policy 108 National student organisations 108 In play, recreation, sport and cultural activities 109 In the media 112 In the workplace 112 In situations of violence 113 CHAPTER SEVEN IMPLEMENTING ARTICLE 12 IN THE PUBLIC ARENA 119 Within local communities 119 At the national level 128 In conflict and humanitarian reconstruction 139 CHAPTER EIGHT FORMS OF CHILD PARTICIPATION 147 Potential approaches to participation 147 Consultative participation 147 Collaborative participation 148 Child-led participation 150 Basic requirements for effective and ethical participation 152 1. Transparent and informative 152 2. Voluntary 152 3. Respectful 153 4. Relevant 153 5. Facilitated with child-friendly environments and working methods 153 6. Inclusive 154 7. Supported by training 155 8. Safe and sensitive to risk 155 9. Accountable 156 Appendix: Child and youth participation resource guide 158 v FOREWORD Since the adoption of the UN Convention aspect of a child’s life – at home, in school, in on the Rights of the Child in 1989, Article healthcare, in play and leisure, in the media, 12 – the provision that children have a in the courts, in local communities, and in right to express their views and have them local and national policy-making, as well as at taken seriously in accordance with their the international level. age and maturity – has proved one of the most challenging to implement. Although However, although much progress has been understanding of childhood and attitudes made in many countries, with countless towards children differs widely across positive examples of legislation, policy cultures, the experience of the Committee and practice, it remains the case that for on the Rights of the Child has been that too many children across the world, the the reasons for excluding children from right to be heard remains unrealised. participation in matters that affect them are Those from more marginalised groups are remarkably consistent across different parts disproportionately denied the opportunity of the world: children lack competence; they – for example, girls, children with disabilities, lack knowledge and judgement; involving children from indigenous groups, children them in decisions is to place too heavy a with undocumented parents, children burden on them; parents know what is best in conflict with the law, and those living for their children; giving children a voice will in extreme poverty. The Committee is lead to excessive demands, bad behaviour, committed to strengthening the capacity disrespect for elders; participation will of governments to introduce the measures expose children to risk of harm. However, necessary to implement Article 12. From we have learned over the past 20 years its dialogue with governments, it is clear that these concerns are not borne out by that while many are committed to meeting the evidence. Time and again, experience their obligations to promote ways of giving shows that children – even very young children a voice, they lack the knowledge, children – given the time and opportunity, confidence or capacity to achieve that goal. demonstrate not only that they have views, The Committee, therefore, recommends experiences and perspectives to express, this resource guide as a major contribution but that their expression can contribute to achieving change. It elaborates the positively to decisions that affect the General Comment developed by the realisation of their rights and wellbeing. Committee, providing practical help Article 12 is important as a fundamental on implementation through examples right: it is a measure of our human dignity of legislation and policy, guidelines for that we are able to be involved in decisions practitioners, evidence from research, and that affect us, consistent with our levels examples of meaningful participation in of competence. It is also a means through practice. It draws together experiences from which other rights are realised. It is not around the world to enable governments possible to claim rights without a voice. to learn from each other, build on existing Children who are silenced cannot challenge developments, and broaden understanding violence and abuse perpetrated against of the scope and meaning of Article 12. them. The capacity to learn is restricted The evidence it produces demonstrates without the chance to question, challenge that not only is it possible to create and debate. Policy-makers cannot identify environments in which children can make the barriers to fulfilling children’s rights if a significant contribution to their own and they do not hear from children about the others’ lives, but that doing so brings real existence and nature of those barriers. benefits. Sustained action across the fields And the right to be heard applies to every outlined in the publication will serve to vi FOREWORD build environments in which children are society. Strengthening skills, confidence and recognised as active citizens, contributing capacity for democratic
Recommended publications
  • The Critique of Federal Family Preservation Policy
    University of Pennsylvania Law School Penn Law: Legal Scholarship Repository Faculty Scholarship 1999 Is There Justice in Children's Rights?: The rC itique of Federal Family Preservation Policy Dorothy E. Roberts University of Pennsylvania Law School, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/faculty_scholarship Part of the Family Law Commons, Family, Life Course, and Society Commons, Inequality and Stratification Commons, Policy Design, Analysis, and Evaluation Commons, Race and Ethnicity Commons, and the Social Policy Commons Recommended Citation Roberts, Dorothy E., "Is There Justice in Children's Rights?: The rC itique of Federal Family Preservation Policy" (1999). Faculty Scholarship. Paper 587. http://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/faculty_scholarship/587 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Penn Law: Legal Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Scholarship by an authorized administrator of Penn Law: Legal Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. IS THERE JUSTICE IN CHILDREN'S RIGHTS?: THE CRITIQUE OF FEDERAL FAMILY PRESERVATION POLICY Dorothy E. Roberts* I. INTRODUCTION: PITTING CHILDREN'S RIGHTS AGAINST FAMILY PRESERVATION In November 1997 President Clinton signed the Adoption and Safe Families Act ("ASFA" or the "Act"),' aimed at dou- bling the number of children adopted annually by 2002.2 ASFA represents a dramatic shift in federal child welfare phi- losophy from an emphasis on the reunification of children in foster care with their biological families toward support for the adoption of these children into new families. The Act's predecessor, the AdoPtion Assistance and Child Welfare Act of 1980 ("1980 Act"), encouraged states to replace the costly and disruptive out-of-home placements that had dominated child welfare practice with preventive and reunification pro- * Professor, Northwestern University School of Law: Faculty Fellow, Institute for Policy Research.
    [Show full text]
  • Adolescent Empowerment and Engagement for Health
    KNOWLEDGE SUMMARY: 2020 WOMEN’S, CHILDREN’S AND ADOLESCENTS’ HEALTH 37 ADOLESCENT EMPOWERMENT AND ENGAGEMENT FOR HEALTH AND WELL-BEING: strengthening capacities, opportunities and rights Photo: Flickr Creative Commons Brown License/UN Women/Ryan Flickr Photo: The world’s 1.2 billion adolescents (aged 10–19 years) have a fundamental right to engage meaningfully in all matters that affect their lives (Box 1) (1, 2). This includes the right to engage in decision-making as equal and valuable partners, while being supported in their roles as adolescent leaders and advocates (3). When adolescents participate in decision-making, the resulting policies and programmes are more likely to respond to their diverse needs (4). Such engagement requires the empowerment of adolescents, by increasing their capacities, skills, autonomy and decision- making power, and by advancing their rights (5–7). Box 1. Definition of meaningful adolescent engagement (1) Meaningful adolescent engagement is defined as an inclusive, intentional and mutually respectful partnership between adolescents and adults, whereby power is shared, respective contributions are valued, and young people’s ideas, perspectives, skills and strengths are integrated into the design and delivery of programmes, strategies, policies and funding mechanisms that affect their lives, communities and countries, and the wider world. Hosted by the World Health Organization What do we know about engaging adolescents Box 2. Engaging adolescents to to improve health and well-being? improve HIV service delivery In recent years there has been an important shift away from Zvandiri is a multicomponent service viewing adolescents solely as passive beneficiaries of services, delivery programme for children and and towards considering them as powerful agents of change.
    [Show full text]
  • TBKOB DEC TALENT DECK 130121ALT Copy
    Legal Disclaimer. This document and the information contained herein are provided to potential investors or Screen bodies by the (“the Company”) regarding he proposed project The Beast kind of Beautiful. It is confidential and proprietary to the company and is intended only for the persons to whom it is transmitted by the Company or its representatives. By accepting this document, the recipient agrees to keep the contents in the strictest confidence and not to reproduce or divulge any of its contents without the prior written consent of the Company. This is a project prospectus. It dies not imply and shall not be construed as an offering of securities. Recipients of this project prospectus are not to construe the content of this document as investment, legal or tax advice from either the Company or the preparers of this document. Each recipient of this project document specifically understands and agrees that any estimates, projections, revenue models, forecasts or assumptions are by definition uncertain. This project prospectus contains forward-looking statements and is subject to risk, uncertainties and assumptions by the Company. The Company’s actual operations and results therefore may differ materially from the forward- thinking statements. Market Data and certain industry forecasts used throughout this business plan were obtained from internal surveys, market research, publicly available information and industry publications. Industry publications generally state that the information contained therein has been obtained from sourced believable to be reliable but that the accuracy and completeness of such information is not guaranteed. Similarly, internal surveys, industry forecasts and market research while believed to be reliable, have not been independently verified by the Company, and representations as to the accuracy of such information is being made.
    [Show full text]
  • Multiple Meanings of Family Issue FF26
    Multiple Meanings of F Family Focus On... Multiple Meanings of Family Issue FF26 IN FOCUS: The Family Family Definitions Continuum page F1 Policy, Gender Power, and amily Family Outcomes page F2 Definitions Continuum Discourse-Dependent Families page F4 Family Values Reconsidered page F5 by Mellisa Holtzman, Ph.D., Assistant Professor, Department of Sociology, Children’s Experiences as Siblings Ball State University, Muncie, Indiana in Diverse Family Structures page F7 efining exactly what one means parenthood, gay and lesbian marriage and Family Structure from the by “the family” can be difficult. parenting, infertility technologies, and the Perspective of Children page F8 D While no single legal definition of potential outcomes of human cloning. Social Fathers page F10 the family exists, policymakers at both the Moreover, given that social and techno- Lives of Foster Parents page F11 state and federal level generally classify logical changes continue to precipitate International Adoptive individuals as family members if they are changes in the structure and meaning of Families page F12 related to each other by virtue of blood, family, understanding how individuals marriage, or adoption. Relationships that choose between definitions of Adopting Children with are not based on one or more of these the family is Developmental Disabilities page F13 criteria usually do not receive state This framework allows crucial. Yet, it Infertile Couples page F15 recognition or sanction. us to contextualize is unlikely that When is a Grandparent Not a we will come to Yet few people would argue variations in family Grandparent? page F16 understand indi- with the idea that family is definitions and understand viduals’ choices Family Identities of Gay Men page F17 based on something more than their implications.
    [Show full text]
  • Retrospective
    Theodore Ruger, Dean and Bernard G. Segal Professor of Law, University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School Penn Law builds bridges with leading international organizations, legal institutions, world leaders, and policymakers that deepen our engagement with pressing global issues. At a time of great geopolitical upheavals, Penn Law's engagement with transnational leaders has helped strengthen our students’ shared commitments to multilateralism, strong international institutions, and diversity in leadership. In an age of intense inquiry of equal representation of gender and race in global decision- making, these portraits and perspectives showcase a few of the global voices that have influenced Penn Law's inclusive vision of global justice. Rangita de Silva de Alwis, Associate Dean of International Affairs, University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School ___ "In the course of history, there comes a time when humanity is called upon to shift to a new level of consciousness to reach a higher moral ground — that is where we are now." -Mary Robinson, President of Ireland; Penn Law Commencement Speaker 2017 “The number of women who have come forward as a result of the #MeToo movement has been astonishing. My hope is not just that it is here to stay, but that it is as effective for the woman who works as a maid in a hotel as it is for Hollywood stars." -Justice Ginsburg at Penn Law Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Associate Justice of the Supreme Court; Penn Law Roberts Lecture, 2018 "Let it be said that human rights are women's rights, and women's rights are human
    [Show full text]
  • On the Ground Achiever and Development Leader
    On the ground achiever and development leader Moushira Khattab is -in no respective order- an Arab, African, Mediterranean, and a Woman born and bred in a 7000 year-old civilization, and developing country; Egypt. Every part of this unique mix blessed her with wide-ranging opportunities to work very closely with those most in need of an organization like UNESCO. Her education and decades long work experience spanned between Africa, USA, Europe and Australia which -along with her diverse roots- helped shape a character of a truly inclusive Global Citizen. As a Ph.D in human rights law, and within her ministerial mandate as Secretary General of the National Council for Childhood and Motherhood [NCCM] - and later on Minister of State for Family and Population, Khattab initiated and led one of the most comprehensive human-rights-based legal reforms in Egypt. And as a firm believer that women, youth, and children are the catalysts for change, she spearheaded the amendment of the Egyptian penal system against human trafficking, the sale of children, sexual abuse and exploitation in pornography, as well as prohibiting and criminalizing Female Genital Mutilation (FGM), which she continues to support in African countries affected by the practice to date. She also orchestrated legal reforms to increase the minimum marriage age to 18 years. Khattab’s credibility and expertise on international diplomacy, both in multilateral and bilateral forums led to her appointment in serving her country through several events of historical significance. She became Egypt’s first Ambassador to post-apartheid South Africa, during Nelson Mandela’s presidency.
    [Show full text]
  • Šolsko Polje, XXXI, 2020, 3-4: Convention on the Rights of the Child
    Convention on the Rights of the Child and Adultism: How to Deconstruct a Myth? Jelena Vranješević, Faculty of Philosophy, University of Belgrade he image of the child in the Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC) (1989) is represented by three “Ps”: protection, provision and Tparticipation (Lansdown, 2005). According to the CRC, states are obliged to protect children from all forms of discrimination and physical or mental violence: injury or abuse, neglect or negligent treatment, mal- treatment or exploitation; economic exploitation or any work that may in- terfere with their education or is harmful to their health or physical, men- tal, spiritual, moral or social development; illicit use of narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances; all forms of exploitation that are harmful to any aspect of their welfare such as the abduction, sale of or traffic of children and all forms of sexual exploitation and abuse. At the same time, having in mind their vulnerability, the obligation of a state (adults) is to provide/ ensure children’s survival and development: adequate family accommo- dation, health and social protection, adequate standard of living, com- pulsory and free primary education and options for secondary schooling; provision of appropriate and equal opportunities for cultural, artistic, rec- reational and leisure activity; the right to a name, family identity and citi- zenship, as well as legal and other assistance for defence purposes. Protection and provision narratives are in harmony with the domi- nant image of the child as sensitive and vulnerable, in need of being pro- tected from various sources of endangerment; also, the child who should be provided with all things necessary for survival and development.
    [Show full text]
  • ARTICLES in ACTION the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child in the UK School Context
    ARTICLES IN ACTION The UN Convention on the Rights of the Child in the UK school context. Unicef/Fields ABOUT THIS RESOURCE ▪ This resource illustrates how the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC) can provide a powerful framework to help articulate a Slides 3 to 6 give more school’s vision, aims, ethos and everyday practice, alongside providing a details about the CRC common language that can be used by all stakeholders within the school and the school context. community. ▪ The resource focusses on the first 42 articles of the CRC (articles 43- Slide 7 explains how to 54 are about how adults and governments must work together to make sure all children can enjoy all their rights). use this resource. ▪ For each article some examples of links between the CRC article and the school context have been made in terms of the school’s strategic Slide 8 is an interactive work and with regard to pupil’s learning and engagement with the table of articles 1-42 wider world. followed by an individual slide for each ▪ Please note, whilst the Convention is relevant to all school settings (nursery, primary & secondary; mainstream and specialist provision) article. some of the suggested links may not be applicable for pupils of particular ages or school settings and therefore should be checked in advance by teachers before their use. © Unicef Rights Respecting Schools 2019 EVERY CHILD HAS RIGHTS... ▪ Every child has rights, whatever their ethnicity, gender, religion, language, abilities or any other status. ▪ The United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (the Convention or CRC) is the most complete statement of children’s rights ever produced and is the most widely-ratified international human rights treaty in history.
    [Show full text]
  • A Handbook on Child Participation in Parliament a H a Ndbook on C H Ndbook Ild P a Rti C I Pa Tion in P a Rli a Ment
    18 - 18 2011 o. N in Parliament in HANDBOOK FOR PARLIAMENTARIANS ARLIAMENTARY UNION INTER-P UNION INTERPARLEMENTAIRE A Handbook on Child Participation Participation Child on A Handbook UNICEF A HAndbook on CHild PArtiCipation in PArliAment IPU A HAndbook on CHild PArtiCipation in PArliAment A Handbook on Child Participation in Parliament Foreword his handbook, a collaborative effort of the Inter-Parliamentary Union and TUNICEF(United Nations Children’s Fund), addresses some of the key ways in which parliamentarians can guarantee that children’s voices, concerns and interests find expression in and enjoy meaningful attention from parliaments. Children are entitled to be involved in the wide range of issues that affect them, and as they grow and develop their opportunities for participation should expand from private to public spaces, from local to global influence. However, while some children are beginning to actively exercise their rights and become agents of change, the voices of many of the world’s young citizens remain unheard, their interests forgotten or ignored. As the principal representatives of their constituents, including children, parliamentarians are uniquely placed to give the views of children – especially those who are the most deprived and most vulnerable – a platform in their work. By inviting children to testify in committees, consulting children in their communities or bringing children’s perspectives to bear on the budget process, parliamentarians can ensure that children’s opinions have an impact on the direction of policies, the implementation of laws and the design of budgets. Listening to children and allowing them to contribute to decision-making processes can lead to better decisions.
    [Show full text]
  • Theory and Implementation Guide
    THEORY AND IMPLEMENTATION GUIDE A training for children and adolescents on how to support a friend in distress Building on the principles of 1 Psychological First Aid The I Support My Friends resource kit has been published by the United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF) in partnership with Save the Children (SC)/MHPSS Collaborative and the World Health Organisation (WHO). First published June 2021 Permission to use, copy and distribute this document, partly or in its entirety, is hereby granted, provided that the due source of reference appears in all copies. © United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF), June 2021 All rights reserved. Permission is required to reproduce any part of this publication. For permission requests, please email: [email protected] This joint product reflects the activities of individual agencies around an issue of common concern. The principles and policies of each agency are governed by the relevant decisions of its governing body. Each agency implements the interventions described in this document in accordance with these principles and policies and within the scope of its mandate. Conceptual development: Miyuki Akasaka (SC Japan), Anne-Sophie Dybdal (SC Denmark). Authors: Pernille Hansen (Consultant), Karin Tengnäs (Consultant). Contributors: Marie Dahl (SC Denmark), Zeinab Hijazi (UNICEF), Roz Keating (SC Denmark), Anna Koehorst (UNICEF), Grethe Markussen (SC Denmark), Jennie O’Connell (Consultant), Ruth O’Connell (SC Denmark), Alison Schafer (WHO), Leslie Snider (SC/MHPSS Collaborative), Kai Yamaguchi Fasting (SC Germany). Editing: Green Ink, Jennifer Groves (Consultant), Kate Harris and Leslie Snider (SC/MHPSS Collaborative), Nancy Sternberg Goodman (Consultant). Suggested citation: United Nations Children’s Fund, Save the Children/MHPSS Collaborative and World Health Organization, I Support My Friends – Theory and Implementation Guide, UNICEF, New York, 2021.
    [Show full text]
  • Positive Action Global
    Grants & Charitable contributions, Fees and sponsorships to Patient Advocacy Organisations and Groups 2020 Global Positive Action Expenditure Amount Organisation Name Project Description Website (GBP) Access Youth Initiative Uganda Improving uptake of PMTCT and HIV services in Gomba District £ 7,913 n/a Action communautaire pour le Bien être de De l'enfant au jeune adulte : grandir et vivre avec le VIH £ 11,054 www.lesassos.com/sn/aBEFAB/ l'Enfant et de la Femme au Burkina Action for Community Driven Development Empowering communities to accelerate the momentum in eMTCT of £ 9,533 n/a (ACODDEV) HIV Action for Research and Development Adolescents Health Access £ 9,124 www.aford.or.ke (AFORD) Combating COVID-19 related Challenges in “Save me HIV /AIDS Action for Sustainable Development Malawi £ 20,000 www.asudvelop.org Prevention Project” “Adam’s Love We Care for HIV and COVID-19” Leveraging Adam’s Love Global Foundation for MSM and communication technology for ensuring seamless HIV support services £ 20,000 www.adamslove.org/ Transgender Health (ALGO) to MSM living with HIV and help overcome challenges during COVID-19 crisis Strengthening community responses on prevention and care for PLHIV Adhara, Asociación VIH/sida £ 19,993 n/a during the COVID-19 emergency crisis. ADPP Mozambique Improving detection and care of the missing CLHIV and young girls (Centro de Investigação Operacional da Beira £ 130,329 www.adpp-mozambique.org/ needing PMTCT (CIOB)) Africare Healthy Babies Countdown to Zero in Viana £ 49,216 www.africare.org/ Experts Clients
    [Show full text]
  • International Differences in Support for Human Rights Sam Mcfarland Phd Western Kentucky University, [email protected]
    Societies Without Borders Volume 12 Article 12 Issue 1 Human Rights Attitudes 2017 International Differences in Support for Human Rights Sam McFarland PhD Western Kentucky University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.law.case.edu/swb Part of the Human Rights Law Commons, and the Social and Behavioral Sciences Commons Recommended Citation McFarland, Sam. 2017. "International Differences in Support for Human Rights." Societies Without Borders 12 (1). Available at: https://scholarlycommons.law.case.edu/swb/vol12/iss1/12 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Cross Disciplinary Publications at Case Western Reserve University School of Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Societies Without Borders by an authorized administrator of Case Western Reserve University School of Law Scholarly Commons. McFarland: International Differences in Support for Human Rights International Differences in Support for Human Rights Sam McFarland Western Kentucky University ABSTRACT International differences in support for human rights are reviewed. The first of two sections reviews variations in the strength of ratification of UN human rights treaties, followed by an examination of the commonalities and relative strengths among the five regional human rights systems. This review indicates that internationally the strongest human rights support is found in Europe and the Americas, with weaker support in Africa, followed by still weaker support in the Arab Union and Southeast Asia. The second section reviews variations in responses to public opinion polls on a number of civil and economic rights. A strong coherence in support for different kinds of rights was found, and between a nation’s public support for human rights and the number of UN human rights conventions a nation has ratified.
    [Show full text]