DOCSLIB.ORG

MARYLAND Structural Design Practices

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
MARYLAND Structural Design Practices Structural Design Practices • Payload interfaces to launch vehicles • Examples of structural design approaches from past space vehicle structural designs U N I V E R S I T Y O F Structural Practices © 2002 David L. Akin - All rights reserved Principles of Space Systems Design MARYLAND http://spacecraft.ssl.umd.edu Shuttle Payload Restraint Configurations U N I V E R S I T Y O F Structural Practices MARYLAND Principles of Space Systems Design Orbiter Active Latches U N I V E R S I T Y O F Structural Practices MARYLAND Principles of Space Systems Design Orbiter Passive Latches U N I V E R S I T Y O F Structural Practices MARYLAND Principles of Space Systems Design Atlas V Payload Fairing Configuration U N I V E R S I T Y O F Structural Practices MARYLAND Principles of Space Systems Design Delta IV Bolted Payload Attach Fitting U N I V E R S I T Y O F Structural Practices MARYLAND Principles of Space Systems Design Delta IV Pyro Payload Attach Fitting U N I V E R S I T Y O F Structural Practices MARYLAND Principles of Space Systems Design Delta IV Marmon Band PAF U N I V E R S I T Y O F Structural Practices MARYLAND Principles of Space Systems Design Saturn V First Stage (S-IC) Cutaway U N I V E R S I T Y O F Structural Practices MARYLAND Principles of Space Systems Design Saturn V S-IC Intertank Fairing U N I V E R S I T Y O F Structural Practices MARYLAND Principles of Space Systems Design Saturn V S-IC Intertank Assembly U N I V E R S I T Y O F Structural Practices MARYLAND Principles of Space Systems Design Saturn V S-IC Ground Handling U N I V E R S I T Y O F Structural Practices MARYLAND Principles of Space Systems Design N-1 Ground Handling U N I V E R S I T Y O F Structural Practices MARYLAND Principles of Space Systems Design Buran Ground Handling U N I V E R S I T Y O F Structural Practices MARYLAND Principles of Space Systems Design Saturn V S-II Stage Stacking U N I V E R S I T Y O F Structural Practices MARYLAND Principles of Space Systems Design Saturn V S-II LOX Tank Cutaway U N I V E R S I T Y O F Structural Practices MARYLAND Principles of Space Systems Design Saturn V S-II Stage Engine Cluster U N I V E R S I T Y O F Structural Practices MARYLAND Principles of Space Systems Design Saturn V S-II Thrust Structure Detail U N I V E R S I T Y O F Structural Practices MARYLAND Principles of Space Systems Design Saturn V S-II Interstage Jettison U N I V E R S I T Y O F Structural Practices MARYLAND Principles of Space Systems Design N-1 Launch Vehicle Interstages U N I V E R S I T Y O F Structural Practices MARYLAND Principles of Space Systems Design Saturn V S-IVB/J-2 Thrust Structure U N I V E R S I T Y O F Structural Practices MARYLAND Principles of Space Systems Design Mercury Spacecraft Layout U N I V E R S I T Y O F Structural Practices MARYLAND Principles of Space Systems Design Mercury Spacecraft Assembly U N I V E R S I T Y O F Structural Practices MARYLAND Principles of Space Systems Design Gemini Spacecraft Equipment Arrangement U N I V E R S I T Y O F Structural Practices MARYLAND Principles of Space Systems Design Apollo Spacecraft Components U N I V E R S I T Y O F Structural Practices MARYLAND Principles of Space Systems Design Soyuz Spacecraft Design U N I V E R S I T Y O F Structural Practices MARYLAND Principles of Space Systems Design Lunar Module Overall Configuration U N I V E R S I T Y O F Structural Practices MARYLAND Principles of Space Systems Design Lunar Module Ascent Stage Structure U N I V E R S I T Y O F Structural Practices MARYLAND Principles of Space Systems Design Lunar Module Ascent Stage Structure U N I V E R S I T Y O F Structural Practices MARYLAND Principles of Space Systems Design Lunar Module Descent Stage Structure U N I V E R S I T Y O F Structural Practices MARYLAND Principles of Space Systems Design Lunar Module Descent Stage Structures U N I V E R S I T Y O F Structural Practices MARYLAND Principles of Space Systems Design Soviet Lunar Lander Concepts U N I V E R S I T Y O F Structural Practices MARYLAND Principles of Space Systems Design LK Lunar Landing Vehicle U N I V E R S I T Y O F Structural Practices MARYLAND Principles of Space Systems Design LK Spacecraft on Moon U N I V E R S I T Y O F Structural Practices MARYLAND Principles of Space Systems Design.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Quantitative Human Spacecraft Design Evaluation Model For
    A QUANTITATIVE HUMAN SPACECRAFT DESIGN EVALUATION MODEL FOR ASSESSING CREW ACCOMMODATION AND UTILIZATION by CHRISTINE FANCHIANG B.S., Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2007 M.S., University of Colorado Boulder, 2010 A thesis submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of the University of Colorado in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Aerospace Engineering Sciences 2017 i This thesis entitled: A Quantitative Human Spacecraft Design Evaluation Model for Assessing Crew Accommodation and Utilization written by Christine Fanchiang has been approved for the Department of Aerospace Engineering Sciences Dr. David M. Klaus Dr. Jessica J. Marquez Dr. Nisar R. Ahmed Dr. Daniel J. Szafir Dr. Jennifer A. Mindock Dr. James A. Nabity Date: 13 March 2017 The final copy of this thesis has been examined by the signatories, and we find that both the content and the form meet acceptable presentation standards of scholarly work in the above mentioned discipline. ii Fanchiang, Christine (Ph.D., Aerospace Engineering Sciences) A Quantitative Human Spacecraft Design Evaluation Model for Assessing Crew Accommodation and Utilization Thesis directed by Professor David M. Klaus Crew performance, including both accommodation and utilization factors, is an integral part of every human spaceflight mission from commercial space tourism, to the demanding journey to Mars and beyond. Spacecraft were historically built by engineers and technologists trying to adapt the vehicle into cutting edge rocketry with the assumption that the astronauts could be trained and will adapt to the design. By and large, that is still the current state of the art. It is recognized, however, that poor human-machine design integration can lead to catastrophic and deadly mishaps.
    [Show full text]
  • Collision Avoidance Operations in a Multi-Mission Environment
    AIAA 2014-1745 SpaceOps Conferences 5-9 May 2014, Pasadena, CA Proceedings of the 2014 SpaceOps Conference, SpaceOps 2014 Conference Pasadena, CA, USA, May 5-9, 2014, Paper DRAFT ONLY AIAA 2014-1745. Collision Avoidance Operations in a Multi-Mission Environment Manfred Bester,1 Bryce Roberts,2 Mark Lewis,3 Jeremy Thorsness,4 Gregory Picard,5 Sabine Frey,6 Daniel Cosgrove,7 Jeffrey Marchese,8 Aaron Burgart,9 and William Craig10 Space Sciences Laboratory, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720-7450 With the increasing number of manmade object orbiting Earth, the probability for close encounters or on-orbit collisions is of great concern to spacecraft operators. The presence of debris clouds from various disintegration events amplifies these concerns, especially in low- Earth orbits. The University of California, Berkeley currently operates seven NASA spacecraft in various orbit regimes around the Earth and the Moon, and actively participates in collision avoidance operations. NASA Goddard Space Flight Center and the Jet Propulsion Laboratory provide conjunction analyses. In two cases, collision avoidance operations were executed to reduce the risks of on-orbit collisions. With one of the Earth orbiting THEMIS spacecraft, a small thrust maneuver was executed to increase the miss distance for a predicted close conjunction. For the NuSTAR observatory, an attitude maneuver was executed to minimize the cross section with respect to a particular conjunction geometry. Operations for these two events are presented as case studies. A number of experiences and lessons learned are included. Nomenclature dLong = geographic longitude increment ΔV = change in velocity dZgeo = geostationary orbit crossing distance increment i = inclination Pc = probability of collision R = geostationary radius RE = Earth radius σ = standard deviation Zgeo = geostationary orbit crossing distance I.
    [Show full text]
  • Dsc Pub Edited
    1968 93) few craters, much like the mare sites, Surveyor 7 although the general area was rougher. About Nation: U.S. (43) 21 hours after landing, ground controllers Objective(s): lunar soft-landing fired a pyrotechnic charge to drop the alpha- Spacecraft: Surveyor-G scattering instrument on the lunar surface. Spacecraft Mass: 1,040.1 kg When the instrument failed to move, con- Mission Design and Management: NASA JPL trollers used the robot arm to force it down. Launch Vehicle: Atlas-Centaur (AC-15 / Atlas The scoop on the arm was used numerous 3C no. 5903C / Centaur D-1A) times for picking up soil, digging trenches, Launch Date and Time: 7 January 1968 / and conducting at least sixteen surface- 06:30:00 UT bearing tests. Apart from taking 21,274 pho- Launch Site: ETR / launch complex 36A tographs (many of them in stereo), Surveyor Scientific Instruments: 7 also served as a target for Earth-based 1) imaging system lasers (of 1-watt power) to accurately 2) alpha-scattering instrument measure the distance between Earth and the 3) surface sampler Moon. Although it was successfully reacti- 4) footpad magnet vated after the lunar night, Surveyor 7 Results: Since Surveyors 1, 3, 5, and 6 success- finally shut down on 21 February 1968. In fully fulfilled requirements in support of total, the five successful Surveyors returned Apollo, NASA opted to use the last remaining more than 87,000 photos of the lunar surface Surveyor for a purely scientific mission out- and demonstrated the feasibility of soft- side of exploring a potential landing site for landing a spacecraft on the lunar surface.
    [Show full text]
  • Issue #1 – 2012 October
    TTSIQ #1 page 1 OCTOBER 2012 Introducing a new free quarterly newsletter for space-interested and space-enthused people around the globe This free publication is especially dedicated to students and teachers interested in space NEWS SECTION pp. 3-22 p. 3 Earth Orbit and Mission to Planet Earth - 13 reports p. 8 Cislunar Space and the Moon - 5 reports p. 11 Mars and the Asteroids - 5 reports p. 15 Other Planets and Moons - 2 reports p. 17 Starbound - 4 reports, 1 article ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ARTICLES, ESSAYS & MORE pp. 23-45 - 10 articles & essays (full list on last page) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- STUDENTS & TEACHERS pp. 46-56 - 9 articles & essays (full list on last page) L: Remote sensing of Aerosol Optical Depth over India R: Curiosity finds rocks shaped by running water on Mars! L: China hopes to put lander on the Moon in 2013 R: First Square Kilometer Array telescopes online in Australia! 1 TTSIQ #1 page 2 OCTOBER 2012 TTSIQ Sponsor Organizations 1. About The National Space Society - http://www.nss.org/ The National Space Society was formed in March, 1987 by the merger of the former L5 Society and National Space institute. NSS has an extensive chapter network in the United States and a number of international chapters in Europe, Asia, and Australia. NSS hosts the annual International Space Development Conference in May each year at varying locations. NSS publishes Ad Astra magazine quarterly. NSS actively tries to influence US Space Policy. About The Moon Society - http://www.moonsociety.org The Moon Society was formed in 2000 and seeks to inspire and involve people everywhere in exploration of the Moon with the establishment of civilian settlements, using local resources through private enterprise both to support themselves and to help alleviate Earth's stubborn energy and environmental problems.
    [Show full text]
  • Deep Space Chronicle Deep Space Chronicle: a Chronology of Deep Space and Planetary Probes, 1958–2000 | Asifa
    dsc_cover (Converted)-1 8/6/02 10:33 AM Page 1 Deep Space Chronicle Deep Space Chronicle: A Chronology ofDeep Space and Planetary Probes, 1958–2000 |Asif A.Siddiqi National Aeronautics and Space Administration NASA SP-2002-4524 A Chronology of Deep Space and Planetary Probes 1958–2000 Asif A. Siddiqi NASA SP-2002-4524 Monographs in Aerospace History Number 24 dsc_cover (Converted)-1 8/6/02 10:33 AM Page 2 Cover photo: A montage of planetary images taken by Mariner 10, the Mars Global Surveyor Orbiter, Voyager 1, and Voyager 2, all managed by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena, California. Included (from top to bottom) are images of Mercury, Venus, Earth (and Moon), Mars, Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, and Neptune. The inner planets (Mercury, Venus, Earth and its Moon, and Mars) and the outer planets (Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, and Neptune) are roughly to scale to each other. NASA SP-2002-4524 Deep Space Chronicle A Chronology of Deep Space and Planetary Probes 1958–2000 ASIF A. SIDDIQI Monographs in Aerospace History Number 24 June 2002 National Aeronautics and Space Administration Office of External Relations NASA History Office Washington, DC 20546-0001 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Siddiqi, Asif A., 1966­ Deep space chronicle: a chronology of deep space and planetary probes, 1958-2000 / by Asif A. Siddiqi. p.cm. – (Monographs in aerospace history; no. 24) (NASA SP; 2002-4524) Includes bibliographical references and index. 1. Space flight—History—20th century. I. Title. II. Series. III. NASA SP; 4524 TL 790.S53 2002 629.4’1’0904—dc21 2001044012 Table of Contents Foreword by Roger D.
    [Show full text]
  • From the Earth to the Moon! Robert Stengel *65, *68! Princeton University" February 22, 2014" What Do These People Have in Common?! 1865!
    From the Earth to the Moon! Robert Stengel *65, *68! Princeton University" February 22, 2014" What Do These People Have in Common?! 1865! Jules Verne (1828-1905)! Ancient Notions of the Night Sky" •! Constellations represent animals and gods" •! Babylonian and Chinese astronomers (21st c. BCE) " –! “Fixed stars” and “moving stars” " –! Moving stars were the abodes of gods" –! They believed the Earth was Flat but surrounded by a celestial sphere" –! Precise charts of the moving stars" –! Calendar (Zodiac) of 12 lunar months" Early Greek Astronomy " •! Pythagoras (570-495 BCE)! –! Earth is a sphere" •! Eratosthenes (276-194 BCE) " –! Earth’s circumference estimated within 2%" Retrograde Motion of Mars Against Background of Fixed Stars" Claudius Ptolemy (90-168)" •! Proposed epicyclic motion of planets" •! Earth at the center of the world" The Astronomical Revolution" •! Galileo Gallilei (1564-1642)" •! Nikolas Copernicus –! Concurred that solar system was (1473-1543)" heliocentric" –! Sun at the center –! Invented telescope, 3x to 30x of solar system (1609)" (1543)" –! Planets move in circles" •! Johannes Kepler (1571-1630)" –! Planets move in •! Isaac Newton ellipses" (1642-1727)" –! Laws of –! Formalized the planetary motion science, with (1609, 1619)" Laws of motion and gravitation (1687)" Sketch by Thomas Harriot, 1610! Orbits 101! Satellites! Escape and Capture (Comets, Meteorites)! Orbits 102! (2-Body Problem) ! •! Circular orbit: altitude and velocity are constant! •! Low Earth orbit: 17,000 mph! –! Super-circular velocities! –! Earth
    [Show full text]
  • Planetary Sciences and Exploration: an Indian Perspective
    Planetary sciences and exploration: An Indian perspective JNGOSWAMI∗ andSVSMURTY Physical Research Laboratory, Navrangpura, Ahmedabad 380 009, India. ∗e-mail: [email protected] Studies of cosmic ray records in meteorites and lunar samples in the nineteen sixties mark the beginning of research in planetary sciences in India. These studies led to very significant results that include discovery of ancient solar flare records in meteorites and constancy of solar and galactic cosmic ray fluxes over long (million year) time scales. Several research groups in India studied fossil records of nuclear track, noble gas, nitrogen, trace element and radioactivity in returned Apollo and Luna samples to understand both the nature of long-term solar wind, solar energetic particle and galactic cosmic ray fluxes as well as chemistry of lunar rocks and soils and their evolution on the lunar surface. The identification of meteorites of martian origin has also led to studies of such meteorites to understand the evolution of martian atmosphere over time. Analysis of diagnostic trace elements in samples of Cretaceous-Tertiary (K/T) boundary and chronology of Deccan volcanism supported asteroid impact as the cause of extinction of life ∼65 million years ago. Studies of impact craters records in the Indian shield have also been pursued and led to the identification of new impact structures. The realization that some primitive meteorites host refractory oxides and silicates that are some of the first solids to form in the solar system has opened a new window to study the events and time scales leading to the origin and early evolution of the solar system.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Meeting of the Lunar Exploration Analysis Group
    Program and Abstract Volume LPI Contribution No. 1820 LUNAR AND PLANETARY IN S TIT U TE Annual Meeting of the Lunar Exploration Analysis Group October 22-24, 2014 Laurel, Maryland INSTITUTIONAL SUPPORT NASA Lunar Exploration Analysis Group The Johns Hopkins University/Applied Physics Laboratory Universities Space Research Association (USRA) Lunar and Planetary Institute National Aeronautics and Space Administration CONVENERS Samuel Lawrence Arizona State University Stephen Mackwell Lunar and Planetary Institute Clive Neal University of Notre Dame Jeffrey Plescia The Johns Hopkins University/Applied Physics Laboratory SCIENCE ORGANIZING COMMITTEE Samuel Lawrence Arizona State University Clive Neal University of Notre Dame Noah Petro NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Jeffrey Plescia The Johns Hopkins University/Applied Physics Laboratory Charles Shearer University of New Mexico Stephen Mackwell Lunar and Planetary Institute James Carpenter European Space Agency-ESTEC Jasper Halekas University of Iowa Greg Schmidt NASA Ames Research Center Lunar and Planetary Institute 3600 Bay Area Boulevard Houston TX 77058-1113 LPI Contribution No. 1820 Compiled in 20 14 by Meeting and Publication Services Lunar and Planetary Institute USRA Houston 3600 Bay Area Boulevard, Houston TX 77058-1113 This material is based upon work supported by NASA under Award No. NNX08AC28A. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this volume are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. The Lunar and Planetary Institute is operated by the Universities Space Research Association under a cooperative agreement with the Science Mission Directorate of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Material in this volume may be copied without restraint for library, abstract service, education, or personal research purposes; however, republication of any paper or portion thereof requires the written permission of the authors as well as the appropriate acknowledgment of this publication.
    [Show full text]
  • The Moon Race: Russian Robotic Missions and Lunar Surface Features Mikhail Marov Vernadsky Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences [email protected]
    The Moon race: Russian robotic missions and Lunar surface features Mikhail Marov Vernadsky Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences [email protected] IAU Centenary Day Institut d'Astrophysique Paris, Oct.4, 2019 Introduction • Historically, the Moon race in the 1960-1970s of last century has been one of the most impressive milestones and exciting events of space exploration. • While it was driven by political motivations both American Apollo expeditions and Soviet robotic missions greatly advanced the Moon knowledge and planetary sciences in general. • International Astronomical Union contributed to scientific exploration of our closest neighborhood, mostly through mapping/naming the Moon surface features and getting insight in lunar/planetary geology and geochemistry. The Moon Race • The Soviet Union’s space program was years ahead of the USA’s in the 1950- 1960s. However Soviets yields Americans the first man landing on the Moon surface and thus lost the Moon race and space leadership. • Why? • There were several reasons of this failure. • The first (and the main one) was an unexpected sudden death of Chief Designer in the USSR rocketry-space program, Head of Energia Corporation Sergey Korolev. • The second one was lacking of the political will and a rather poor management resulting in loosing money and inefficient governing the project of piloted flights to the Moon. • The situation was also badly impacted by competition of chief designers in the implementation of N1-L1 (orbiting) and N1-L3 (landing) programs. Soviet Manned Moon Mission
    [Show full text]
  • And Are Representative Selections from the Many Spacecraft Used in Space
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 026 276 SE 006 271 By-Dean, C. Thomas; And Others Model Spacecraft Construction, Units for Secondary School Industrial Arts. California State Coll., Long Beach. Spons Agency-National Aeronautics and Space Administration, t4ashington, D.C. Pub Date 66 Note-1.88p. Available from-Superintendent of Documents, Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. 20402 ($1.00). EDRS Price MF -$0.75 HC-$9.50 Descriptors-Aerospace Technology, *Earth Science, *Industrial Arts, Instructional Materials, Laboratory Manuals, Models, *Science Activities, *Secondary School Science Identifiers-National Aeronautics and Space Administration . This publication provides twelve model spacecraft construction plans foruse by secondary school teachers in industrial arts classes. These modelswere adopted and developed from plans supplied by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration and are representative selectionsfromthe many spacecraft used inspace exploration programs. Some examples are *Saturn, Explorer, Mariner, Apollo, Gemini, and Tiros. Each model is described and illustrated in detail, and background dataare provided for each rocket model. (BC) r ; .\- ' .7 S. - I / , ,I "." , .21 , " I. I go nr .K.1110dO 1.101lied (. SNOIN1d03141.N01119003 W081 aO 01A13338MIA 10 3311040 S11410d Sy iY131110 KI130311 03311(108(138111E38d38 ONILYN19180E1ldnS331311 801,111116198011338 SVH IN31.10300 ION40 80913dOil MIS SIN 181/113M NOIIVA0.1NOI1V3RO1 '141101 JO JO331A0 1N.314RWM1 .S71 7 " MODEL SPACECRAFT CONSTRUCTION Units for Secondary School industrial
    [Show full text]
  • Flight to the Moon Spacecraft Attitude Control, MIT IAP 16.S585
    1/17/21 Earth-Moon Orbit Orbital Period: 27-1/2 days One side of Moon always faces Earth Flight to the Moon Spacecraft Attitude Control, MIT IAP 16.S585 Robert Stengel Princeton University There is no “Dark Side” January 14, 2021 1 ALL SIDES are dark once a month 2 1 2 The Earth and the Moon December 17, 1958 Earth mass = 81.4 x Moon mass Orbit eccentricity = 0.05 1st Cosmonaut Mercury 7, 1959 Class, 1959 3 4 3 4 1 1/17/21 April 12, 1961 February 20, 1962 John Glenn Vostok 1 Friendship 7 Mercury-Atlas Yuri Gagarin 5 6 5 6 Project Gemini [1965-66] Lunar Missions 10 crewed Titan II missions June 1961 Competition among contractors for the spacecraft and launch rockets US takes Space Race Lead 7 8 7 8 2 1/17/21 First Apollo Program Contract MIT Instrumentation Laboratory August 9, 1961 HOWEVER … Lunar landing technique had not been decided 9 10 9 10 Alternative Landers Saturn 3rd Stage 11 12 11 12 3 1/17/21 Proposed Saturn Launch Vehicles July 1962 Two Saturn 5s One or One Saturn 5 Nova Ten Saturn 1s Saturn 1 Saturn 5 Nova (Saturn 8) 13 14 13 14 Saturn Launch Vehicles Saturn 1B Saturn 5 The Apollo Modules Earth Orbit Missions Lunar Missions Service Command Lunar Module Module Module North American Grumman 15 16 15 16 4 1/17/21 First Manned Flight, Apollo 7 Apollo 8, December 21-27, 1968 October 11, 1968 • Earth-orbit mission to test LM planned • More ambitious mission was pursued st Eisele Schirra Cunningham • Repurposed to 1 manned flight to the Moon • 6-day mission, no Lunar Module Coast Reentry Trans- Moon’s Lunar Coast Injection “Sphere
    [Show full text]
  • Historical Scrapbook
    1 ' 1898 THE. COrRIER-.TOU"R XAL. l QUI ~YI I.. I.~E, SATURDAY J\lOHNING, JUNE U, :::::::: THE MEANING OF THE HONOR. Dr. Muthcws (!! Now Presidl!ttt of America' s Greatest Medical A~soclation end Otte of the Most Splendid Itt the World. P R.. JO!'IEPH 111. :l\1,\TIIF:WS. \ Pr. J011~ph M. :Matb~wF. o! this ell>"• who was t:!'N:ted l're~~I<'INit of tho American lt('dl nl Auoclntlon nt Dcmver Wrdn<:'11<l11~·. hns 111 that < r lion r('r lv~IJ ''"" o! the hllrh<llt I onon that <'an bt> JULl·1 a ph~slclnn, M t 1th• 15 a. r uonal t o<J~·: and rom· pr 'u~ Stlltr> nnd T~rrltory tn tbo Lnl<m. Dr, N. Srnn,, <'r C'hl go, wne the J t1!•lcl n• !1st :re r. and Dr. ::lternberg, ~urgC>on l.<!lt>rnl o! the nrtn>'• Is the r <'tlt•· lng Prt1111t>nt. Dr 1\l uthc" bns had mnny honors confcn'(!\1 llt•ort him In t ' •e pant, !Ill Is •·X· Pr~ clt nt of the lth!slssii•PI \all·~· lllu.llral A CH llltton. l'r<'Bll! r. t tlf ~~'•" h•mttH'ky St I• ~I• lcnl ~o • ty, I'r stcl~nt or tho Stut.:- Bon•·•! or Ht>:tll\1 .>! Kl'tltllel;> . nntl has tbl• ) r b n l'lnt \'It'< .Prt (l(·nt ot tho ,\ malcan Mcdknl ,\ssoclnt lo'll, till• grt>at 004) ot wN,..h h• hn Ju~t b' n d•·<·Lo•l l'ru;LI .
    [Show full text]