DOCSLIB.ORG

Annual Meeting of the Lunar Exploration Analysis Group

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Annual Meeting of the Lunar Exploration Analysis Group Program and Abstract Volume LPI Contribution No. 1820 LUNAR AND PLANETARY IN S TIT U TE Annual Meeting of the Lunar Exploration Analysis Group October 22-24, 2014 Laurel, Maryland INSTITUTIONAL SUPPORT NASA Lunar Exploration Analysis Group The Johns Hopkins University/Applied Physics Laboratory Universities Space Research Association (USRA) Lunar and Planetary Institute National Aeronautics and Space Administration CONVENERS Samuel Lawrence Arizona State University Stephen Mackwell Lunar and Planetary Institute Clive Neal University of Notre Dame Jeffrey Plescia The Johns Hopkins University/Applied Physics Laboratory SCIENCE ORGANIZING COMMITTEE Samuel Lawrence Arizona State University Clive Neal University of Notre Dame Noah Petro NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Jeffrey Plescia The Johns Hopkins University/Applied Physics Laboratory Charles Shearer University of New Mexico Stephen Mackwell Lunar and Planetary Institute James Carpenter European Space Agency-ESTEC Jasper Halekas University of Iowa Greg Schmidt NASA Ames Research Center Lunar and Planetary Institute 3600 Bay Area Boulevard Houston TX 77058-1113 LPI Contribution No. 1820 Compiled in 20 14 by Meeting and Publication Services Lunar and Planetary Institute USRA Houston 3600 Bay Area Boulevard, Houston TX 77058-1113 This material is based upon work supported by NASA under Award No. NNX08AC28A. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this volume are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. The Lunar and Planetary Institute is operated by the Universities Space Research Association under a cooperative agreement with the Science Mission Directorate of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Material in this volume may be copied without restraint for library, abstract service, education, or personal research purposes; however, republication of any paper or portion thereof requires the written permission of the authors as well as the appropriate acknowledgment of this publication. Abstracts in this volume may be cited as Author A. B. (20 14) Title of abstract. In Annual Meeting ofthe Lunar Exploration Analysis Group, p. XX. LPI Contribution No. 1820, Lunar and Planetary Institute, Houston. ISSN No. 0161-5297 Preface This volume contains abstracts that have been accepted for presentation at the Annual Meeting of the Lunar Exploration Analysis Group, October 22-24, 2014, Laurel, Maryland. Administration and publications support for this meeting were provided by the staff of the Meeting and Publication Services Department at the Lunar and Planetary Institute. Technical Guide to Sessions Wednesday, October 22, 2014 8:30a.m. Bldg. 200, Room 100 Lunar Programmatic Issues- NASA/LEAG 1:30 p.m. Bldg. 200, Room 100 Lunar Volatiles: Current Understanding I 5:30p.m. Bldg. 200, Lobby Poster Session Thursday, October 23, 2014 8:30a.m. Bldg. 200, Room 100 Lunar Volatiles: Current Understanding II 1:30 p.m. Bldg. 200, Room 100 Lunar Volatiles: Current Understanding III Friday, October 24, 2014 8:30a.m. Bldg. 200, Room I 00 Future Exploration: Instruments, Missions, and Techniques 1:30p.m. Bldg. 200, Room 100 Future Exploration: Strategies and Opportunities Contents Program ....................................................................................................................................................................... xi Taurus Littrow Pyroclastic Deposit- An Optimum Feedstock for Lunar Oxygen C. C. Allen ....................................................................................................................................................... I The Need for Lunar and Planetary Cartography Planning B. A. Archinal, R. L. Kirk, L. R. Gaddis, .!. Hagerty, .!. Skinner, T. N. Titus, L. P. Keszthelyi, T. Hare, S . .!. Lawrence, R. Beyer, A. Nefian, T. Fang, and T. Duxbwy ......................................................... 3 Coregistration of Elevation Data from the Lunar Orbiter Laser Altimeter and the SELENE Terrain Camera M. K. Barker, E. Mazarico, G. A. Neumann, D. E. Smith, and M. T. Zuber ................................................... 5 Astronaut Geology Training .!. E. Bleacher, D. B. Eppler, B . .!. Tewksbury, and M. A. Helper ................................................................... 7 Accessing and Assessing Lunar Resources with PROSPECT .!. D. Cmpenter, S. Barber, P. Cerroni, R. Fisackerly, A. Fumagalli, B. Houdou, C. Howe, P. G. Magnani, A. Morse, E. Monchieri, P. Reiss, L. Richter, F. Rizzi, S. Sheridan, L. Waugh, and I. P. Wright .............................................................................................................................. 9 Lunar Exploration in ESA .!. D. Carpenter, B. Houdou, F. Fisackerly, D. De Rosa, B. Patti, .!. Schiemann, B. Hufenbach, and B. Foing .......................................................................................................................... 11 Investigation oflonized Volatiles and Interior Structure of the Moon: Implications from Restored Apollo Magnetic Field Data P . .!. Chi ......................................................................................................................................................... 13 Detennining the Magnitude of Neutron and Galactic Cosmic Ray (GCR) Fluxes at the Moon Using the Lunar Exploration Neutron Detector (LEND) During the Historic Space-Age Era of High GCR Flux G. Chin, R. Sagdeev, G. M. Millikh, D. Usikov, .!. .!. Su, W. Boynton, D. Golovin, K. Harshman, M. Litvak, I. G. Mitrofanov, T. McClanahan, T. A. Livengood, L. Evans, and R. Starr ................................................................................................................................... 15 An ALSEP-Like Lunar Surface Science Package in a Cubesat Form Factor? P. E. Clark, .!. Didion, and R. Cox ................................................................................................................ 16 Deep Space Cubesat Orbiter and Compact Broadband IR Instrument to Determine the Systematics of Lunar Water P. E. Clark, R. MacDowall, D. Reuter, R. Mauk,.!. Didion, D. Patel, W. Farrell, and R. Cox .................... 17 LROC NAC Photometry as a Tool for Studying Physical and Compositional Properties of the Lunar Surface R. N. Clegg, B. L. Jolliff, A. K. Boyd, .!. D. Stopar, H. Sa to, M S. Robinson, and B. W. Hapke ................... 18 Lunar Flashlight: Mapping Lunar Surface Volatiles Using a Cube sat B. A. Cohen, P. O. Hayne, D. A. Paige, and B. T. Greenhagen .................................................................... 20 Copernicus Crater: Compelling Science Exploration Target Waiting for Future Missions D. Dhingra, C. M. Pieters, and.!. W. Head................................................................................................... 22 Solar Wind Implantation into Lunar Regolith: Hydrogen Retention in a Surface with Defects W M Farrell, D. M Hurley, and MI. Zimmerman ..................................................................................... 24 Lunar Surface Models H. Fink. .......................................................................................................................................................... 25 The Geology oflnferno Chasm, Idaho: A Terrestrial Analog for Lunar Rilles? W B. Gany, S. S. Hughes, S. E. Kobs Nawotniak, C. D. Neish, C. W Haberle, J L. Heldmann, D. S. S. Lim, and FINESSE Team ....................................................................................... 26 Spectral and Therrnophysical Properties of Lunar Swirls from the Diviner Lunar Radiometer T D. Glotch, J L. Bandfield, P. G. Lucey, P. O. Hayne, B. T Greenhagen, J A. Arnold, R. R. Ghent, and D. A. Paige ......................................................................................................................... 28 The Benefits of Sample Return: Connecting Apollo Soils and Diviner Lunar Radiometer Remote Sensing Data B. T. Greenhagen, K. L. Donaldson Hanna, I. R. Thomas, N. E. Bowles, C. C. Allen, C. M Pieters, and D. A. Paige ...................................................................................................................... 30 International Strategy for the Exploration of Lunar Polar Volatiles J E. Gruener and N. H. Suzuki ..................................................................................................................... 31 Why Do We Need the Moon: Next Steps Forward for Moon Exploration U. G. Guven ................................................................................................................................................... 32 Space Mission to the Moon with a Low Cost Moon Probe Nanosatellite: University Project Feasibility Analysis and Design Concepts U G. Guven, G. V. Velidi, and L. D. Datta ................................................................................................... 33 ARTEMIS Observations of the Space Environment Around the Moon and its Interaction with the Atmosphere and Surface J S. Halekas and ARTEMIS Team ................................................................................................................ 34 Evidence for Exposed Water Frost in the Moon's South Polar Regions from LRO Ultraviolet Albedo and Temperature Measurements P. O. Hayne, A. Hendrix, E. Sefton-Nash, P. G. Lucey, K. D. Retherford, J-P. Williams, M A. Siegler, B. T Greenhagen, and D. A. Paige ........................................................................................ 36
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Quantitative Human Spacecraft Design Evaluation Model For
    A QUANTITATIVE HUMAN SPACECRAFT DESIGN EVALUATION MODEL FOR ASSESSING CREW ACCOMMODATION AND UTILIZATION by CHRISTINE FANCHIANG B.S., Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2007 M.S., University of Colorado Boulder, 2010 A thesis submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of the University of Colorado in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Aerospace Engineering Sciences 2017 i This thesis entitled: A Quantitative Human Spacecraft Design Evaluation Model for Assessing Crew Accommodation and Utilization written by Christine Fanchiang has been approved for the Department of Aerospace Engineering Sciences Dr. David M. Klaus Dr. Jessica J. Marquez Dr. Nisar R. Ahmed Dr. Daniel J. Szafir Dr. Jennifer A. Mindock Dr. James A. Nabity Date: 13 March 2017 The final copy of this thesis has been examined by the signatories, and we find that both the content and the form meet acceptable presentation standards of scholarly work in the above mentioned discipline. ii Fanchiang, Christine (Ph.D., Aerospace Engineering Sciences) A Quantitative Human Spacecraft Design Evaluation Model for Assessing Crew Accommodation and Utilization Thesis directed by Professor David M. Klaus Crew performance, including both accommodation and utilization factors, is an integral part of every human spaceflight mission from commercial space tourism, to the demanding journey to Mars and beyond. Spacecraft were historically built by engineers and technologists trying to adapt the vehicle into cutting edge rocketry with the assumption that the astronauts could be trained and will adapt to the design. By and large, that is still the current state of the art. It is recognized, however, that poor human-machine design integration can lead to catastrophic and deadly mishaps.
    [Show full text]
  • 120611MS.Pdf
    - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -ミルスペース 120611- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - [What’s New in Virtual Library?] McGrawHill AW&ST AVIATION WEEK 1205AeroAme_Cover-ss.jpg 120528AWST_Contents.pdf, Cover.jpg 1204AeroAme_Cover-s.jpg Milbank Space Business Review SJAC 1205_Space Business Review.pdf SJAC1203_Jisedai-Uchu-Project-ni-kansuru-Chosa_Contents.pd NASA KSC SpaceportNews f, Cover.jpg 120601nasa_KSC_SpaceportNews_8pages.pdf, Cover.jpg SJAC1203_CD_Sekai-No-Uchu-Infra-Databook_Cover.jpg NASA MSFC MarshallStar CNES CnesMag 120530MarshallStar_Cover.jpg 1204cnesmag_No.53_Contents.pdf, Cover.jpg 120523MarshallStar_Cover.jpg ISAS ISAS News AIAA Aerospace America 1205ISAS_News_374_14pages.pdf, Cover.jpg 1206AeroAme_Cover-ss.jpg [What’s New in Reaｌ Library?] 重力とは何か、アインシュタインから超弦理論へ、宇宙の謎に迫る、 大栗博司 (幻冬舎新書, 12.05) 収蔵。 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Futron 12.06- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 2012 Orbital Launches by Launch Vehicle Family 2012 Orbital Commercial Launches 1 Manufacturer Market Share of Satellites Launched Through May 31, 2012 Selected Satellites with Regulatory Activity During May 2012 Satellite Location Activity NSS-7 20WL THE FCC granted SES‘s request to modify its license in terms of its access to the U.S. market within the FCC's Permitted Space Station List by relocating the C- and Ku-band operations for NSS-7 from 22 WL to 20 WL. DIRECTV 14 99WL DIRECTV applied to launch and operate a Ka-band satellite, DIRECTV 14, to be located at 99 WL. Intelsat 19 194WL The FCC granted Intelsat's request to launch and operate a C-/Ku-band satellite, Intelsat 19, to be located at 194 WL (166 EL). AMC 2 340.8WL SES applied to reassign AMC-2 from 355.02 WL (4.98 EL) to 340.8 WL (19.2 EL) where it will operate pursuant to Luxembourg ITU filings and will be flown in an inverted mode to provide Ku-band coverage in Southern Africa.
    [Show full text]
  • International Docking System Standard (IDSS) Interface Definition Document (IDD)
    IDSS IDD Revision E October 2016 International Docking System Standard (IDSS) Interface Definition Document (IDD) Revision E October 2016 IDSS IDD Revision E October 2016 This page intentionally left blank. IDSS IDD Revision E October 2016 REVISION AND HISTORY REV. DESCRIPTION PUB. DATE - Initial Release 09-21-10 A Revised, rearranged, and added text to nearly all sections of 05-13-11 document. Revised & renumbered figures. Added requirements on mechanical soft capture, soft capture sensors, HCS seals, hook stiffness, separation system, electrical bonding, environments, and materials. Added Docking Performance section, and Appendix A. B Document Hard Capture System parameter values, figure updates, 11-15-12 separation system force addition, editorial correction and updates. C Document the narrow ring Soft Capture System (SCS) geometric 11-20-13 parameters and update applicable figures. Added Appendix B on Magnetic Soft Capture. D Revision D is the first version of the document under NASA 08-04-15 configuration control and released by NASA ERU. Revision D includes the following DCNs: DCN 001 DCN 002 DCN 003 DCN 004C DCN 005 DCN 006 DCN 007 DCN 008A DCN 009B DCN 010 DCN 011 DCN 012 DCN 013 E Revision E includes the following DCNs: XX-XX-XX DCN 014 DCN 015A DCN 017 DCN 018 DCN 020 DCN 021 IDSS IDD Revision E October 2016 REVISION AND HISTORY REV. DESCRIPTION PUB. DATE DCN 022 DCN 023 DCN 024 DCN 025 DCN 027A DCN 029 DCN 032 DCN 033 DCN 037 DCN 038 DCN 039 IDSS IDD Revision E October 2016 This page intentionally left blank.
    [Show full text]
  • Flight Opportunities and Small Spacecraft Technology Program Updates NAC Technology, Innovation and Engineering Committee Meeting | March 19, 2020
    Flight Opportunities and Small Spacecraft Technology Program Updates NAC Technology, Innovation and Engineering Committee Meeting | March 19, 2020 Christopher Baker NASA Space Technology Mission Directorate Flight Opportunities and Small Spacecraft Technology Program Executive National Aeronautics and Space Administration 1 CHANGING THE PACE OF SPACE Through Small Spacecraft Technology and Flight Opportunities, Space Tech is pursuing the rapid identification, development, and testing of capabilities that exploit agile spacecraft platforms and responsive launch capabilities to increase the pace of space exploration, discovery, and the expansion of space commerce. National Aeronautics and Space Administration 2 THROUGH SUBORBITAL FLIGHT The Flight Opportunities program facilitates rapid demonstration of promising technologies for space exploration, discovery, and the expansion of space commerce through suborbital testing with industry flight providers LEARN MORE: WWW.NASA.GOV/TECHNOLOGY Photo Credit: Blue Origin National Aeronautics and Space Administration 3 FLIGHT OPPORTUNITIES BY THE NUMBERS Between 2011 and today… In 2019 alone… Supported 195 successful fights Supported 15 successful fights Enabled 676 tests of payloads Enabled 47 tests of payloads 254 technologies in the portfolio 86 technologies in the portfolio 13 active commercial providers 9 active commercial providers National Aeronautics and Space Administration Numbers current as of March 1, 2020 4 TECHNOLOGY TESTED IN SUBORBITAL Lunar Payloads ISS SPACE IS GOING TO EARTH ORBIT, THE MOON, MARS, AND BEYOND Mars 2020 Commercial Critical Space Lunar Payload Exploration Services Solutions National Aeronautics and Space Administration 5 SUBORBITAL INFUSION HIGHLIGHT Commercial Lunar Payload Services Four companies selected as Commercial Lunar Payload Services (CPLS) providers leveraged Flight Opportunities-supported suborbital flights to test technologies that are incorporated into their landers and/or are testing lunar landing technologies under Flight Opportunities for others.
    [Show full text]
  • Project Selene: AIAA Lunar Base Camp
    Project Selene: AIAA Lunar Base Camp AIAA Space Mission System 2019-2020 Virginia Tech Aerospace Engineering Faculty Advisor : Dr. Kevin Shinpaugh Team Members : Olivia Arthur, Bobby Aselford, Michel Becker, Patrick Crandall, Heidi Engebreth, Maedini Jayaprakash, Logan Lark, Nico Ortiz, Matthew Pieczynski, Brendan Ventura Member AIAA Number Member AIAA Number And Signature And Signature Faculty Advisor 25807 Dr. Kevin Shinpaugh Brendan Ventura 1109196 Matthew Pieczynski 936900 Team Lead/Operations Logan Lark 902106 Heidi Engebreth 1109232 Structures & Environment Patrick Crandall 1109193 Olivia Arthur 999589 Power & Thermal Maedini Jayaprakash 1085663 Robert Aselford 1109195 CCDH/Operations Michel Becker 1109194 Nico Ortiz 1109533 Attitude, Trajectory, Orbits and Launch Vehicles Contents 1 Symbols and Acronyms 8 2 Executive Summary 9 3 Preface and Introduction 13 3.1 Project Management . 13 3.2 Problem Definition . 14 3.2.1 Background and Motivation . 14 3.2.2 RFP and Description . 14 3.2.3 Project Scope . 15 3.2.4 Disciplines . 15 3.2.5 Societal Sectors . 15 3.2.6 Assumptions . 16 3.2.7 Relevant Capital and Resources . 16 4 Value System Design 17 4.1 Introduction . 17 4.2 Analytical Hierarchical Process . 17 4.2.1 Longevity . 18 4.2.2 Expandability . 19 4.2.3 Scientific Return . 19 4.2.4 Risk . 20 4.2.5 Cost . 21 5 Initial Concept of Operations 21 5.1 Orbital Analysis . 22 5.2 Launch Vehicles . 22 6 Habitat Location 25 6.1 Introduction . 25 6.2 Region Selection . 25 6.3 Locations of Interest . 26 6.4 Eliminated Locations . 26 6.5 Remaining Locations . 27 6.6 Chosen Location .
    [Show full text]
  • The International Space Station
    The International Space Station Aeronautics and Space Engineering Board April 2015 Sam Scimemi Director, International Space Station NASA Headquarters NASA’s and America’s goals onboard the Station Enable long duration human spaceflight beyond LEO Enable a commercial market in LEO Advance benefits to humanity through research Basis for international HSF exploration partnerships 2 Where we are Today In January 2014 the Administration extended the life of ISS at least to 2024 Each International Partner is working within their own policy framework to determine ISS future beyond 2020 Begun 1 year crew expedition and associated long duration human performance research Together with CASIS, NASA is expanding the commercial demand for micro-gravity research and LEO access ISS has become an important space and earth science platform expanding our knowledge of our home planet and the universe Commercial transportation development and operations for ISS is having a significant influence on the aerospace industry; considering the next commercial activity in LEO 3 3 4/ 4 4 The Future of Human Space Exploration NASA’s Building Blocks to Mars Expanding capabilities at an asteroid redirected to lunar orbit Exploring Mars and other deep U.S. companies space provide destinations affordable access to low Earth orbit Learning the fundamentals aboard the Traveling beyond low Earth International orbit with the Space Launch Space Station System rocket and Orion crew capsule Missions: 6 to 12 months Missions: 1 month up to 12 months Missions: 2 to 3 years Return:
    [Show full text]
  • Sky and Telescope
    SkyandTelescope.com The Lunar 100 By Charles A. Wood Just about every telescope user is familiar with French comet hunter Charles Messier's catalog of fuzzy objects. Messier's 18th-century listing of 109 galaxies, clusters, and nebulae contains some of the largest, brightest, and most visually interesting deep-sky treasures visible from the Northern Hemisphere. Little wonder that observing all the M objects is regarded as a virtual rite of passage for amateur astronomers. But the night sky offers an object that is larger, brighter, and more visually captivating than anything on Messier's list: the Moon. Yet many backyard astronomers never go beyond the astro-tourist stage to acquire the knowledge and understanding necessary to really appreciate what they're looking at, and how magnificent and amazing it truly is. Perhaps this is because after they identify a few of the Moon's most conspicuous features, many amateurs don't know where Many Lunar 100 selections are plainly visible in this image of the full Moon, while others require to look next. a more detailed view, different illumination, or favorable libration. North is up. S&T: Gary The Lunar 100 list is an attempt to provide Moon lovers with Seronik something akin to what deep-sky observers enjoy with the Messier catalog: a selection of telescopic sights to ignite interest and enhance understanding. Presented here is a selection of the Moon's 100 most interesting regions, craters, basins, mountains, rilles, and domes. I challenge observers to find and observe them all and, more important, to consider what each feature tells us about lunar and Earth history.
    [Show full text]
  • Conceptual Human-System Interface Design for a Lunar Access Vehicle
    Conceptual Human-System Interface Design for a Lunar Access Vehicle Mary Cummings Enlie Wang Cristin Smith Jessica Marquez Mark Duppen Stephane Essama Massachusetts Institute of Technology* Prepared For Draper Labs Award #: SC001-018 PI: Dava Newman HAL2005-04 September, 2005 http://halab.mit.edu e-mail: [email protected] *MIT Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Cambridge, MA 02139 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION..................................................................................................... 1 1.1 THE GENERAL FRAMEWORK................................................................................ 1 1.2 ORGANIZATION.................................................................................................... 2 2 H-SI BACKGROUND AND MOTIVATION ........................................................ 3 2.1 APOLLO VS. LAV H-SI........................................................................................ 3 2.2 APOLLO VS. LUNAR ACCESS REQUIREMENTS ...................................................... 4 3 THE LAV CONCEPTUAL PROTOTYPE............................................................ 5 3.1 HS-I DESIGN ASSUMPTIONS ................................................................................ 5 3.2 THE CONCEPTUAL PROTOTYPE ............................................................................ 6 3.3 LANDING ZONE (LZ) DISPLAY............................................................................. 8 3.3.1 LZ Display Introduction.................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Planning a Mission to the Lunar South Pole
    Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter: (Diviner) Audience Planning a Mission to Grades 9-10 the Lunar South Pole Time Recommended 1-2 hours AAAS STANDARDS Learning Objectives: • 12A/H1: Exhibit traits such as curiosity, honesty, open- • Learn about recent discoveries in lunar science. ness, and skepticism when making investigations, and value those traits in others. • Deduce information from various sources of scientific data. • 12E/H4: Insist that the key assumptions and reasoning in • Use critical thinking to compare and evaluate different datasets. any argument—whether one’s own or that of others—be • Participate in team-based decision-making. made explicit; analyze the arguments for flawed assump- • Use logical arguments and supporting information to justify decisions. tions, flawed reasoning, or both; and be critical of the claims if any flaws in the argument are found. • 4A/H3: Increasingly sophisticated technology is used Preparation: to learn about the universe. Visual, radio, and X-ray See teacher procedure for any details. telescopes collect information from across the entire spectrum of electromagnetic waves; computers handle Background Information: data and complicated computations to interpret them; space probes send back data and materials from The Moon’s surface thermal environment is among the most extreme of any remote parts of the solar system; and accelerators give planetary body in the solar system. With no atmosphere to store heat or filter subatomic particles energies that simulate conditions in the Sun’s radiation, midday temperatures on the Moon’s surface can reach the stars and in the early history of the universe before 127°C (hotter than boiling water) whereas at night they can fall as low as stars formed.
    [Show full text]
  • Collision Avoidance Operations in a Multi-Mission Environment
    AIAA 2014-1745 SpaceOps Conferences 5-9 May 2014, Pasadena, CA Proceedings of the 2014 SpaceOps Conference, SpaceOps 2014 Conference Pasadena, CA, USA, May 5-9, 2014, Paper DRAFT ONLY AIAA 2014-1745. Collision Avoidance Operations in a Multi-Mission Environment Manfred Bester,1 Bryce Roberts,2 Mark Lewis,3 Jeremy Thorsness,4 Gregory Picard,5 Sabine Frey,6 Daniel Cosgrove,7 Jeffrey Marchese,8 Aaron Burgart,9 and William Craig10 Space Sciences Laboratory, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720-7450 With the increasing number of manmade object orbiting Earth, the probability for close encounters or on-orbit collisions is of great concern to spacecraft operators. The presence of debris clouds from various disintegration events amplifies these concerns, especially in low- Earth orbits. The University of California, Berkeley currently operates seven NASA spacecraft in various orbit regimes around the Earth and the Moon, and actively participates in collision avoidance operations. NASA Goddard Space Flight Center and the Jet Propulsion Laboratory provide conjunction analyses. In two cases, collision avoidance operations were executed to reduce the risks of on-orbit collisions. With one of the Earth orbiting THEMIS spacecraft, a small thrust maneuver was executed to increase the miss distance for a predicted close conjunction. For the NuSTAR observatory, an attitude maneuver was executed to minimize the cross section with respect to a particular conjunction geometry. Operations for these two events are presented as case studies. A number of experiences and lessons learned are included. Nomenclature dLong = geographic longitude increment ΔV = change in velocity dZgeo = geostationary orbit crossing distance increment i = inclination Pc = probability of collision R = geostationary radius RE = Earth radius σ = standard deviation Zgeo = geostationary orbit crossing distance I.
    [Show full text]
  • Highlights in Space 2010
    International Astronautical Federation Committee on Space Research International Institute of Space Law 94 bis, Avenue de Suffren c/o CNES 94 bis, Avenue de Suffren UNITED NATIONS 75015 Paris, France 2 place Maurice Quentin 75015 Paris, France Tel: +33 1 45 67 42 60 Fax: +33 1 42 73 21 20 Tel. + 33 1 44 76 75 10 E-mail: : [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] Fax. + 33 1 44 76 74 37 URL: www.iislweb.com OFFICE FOR OUTER SPACE AFFAIRS URL: www.iafastro.com E-mail: [email protected] URL : http://cosparhq.cnes.fr Highlights in Space 2010 Prepared in cooperation with the International Astronautical Federation, the Committee on Space Research and the International Institute of Space Law The United Nations Office for Outer Space Affairs is responsible for promoting international cooperation in the peaceful uses of outer space and assisting developing countries in using space science and technology. United Nations Office for Outer Space Affairs P. O. Box 500, 1400 Vienna, Austria Tel: (+43-1) 26060-4950 Fax: (+43-1) 26060-5830 E-mail: [email protected] URL: www.unoosa.org United Nations publication Printed in Austria USD 15 Sales No. E.11.I.3 ISBN 978-92-1-101236-1 ST/SPACE/57 *1180239* V.11-80239—January 2011—775 UNITED NATIONS OFFICE FOR OUTER SPACE AFFAIRS UNITED NATIONS OFFICE AT VIENNA Highlights in Space 2010 Prepared in cooperation with the International Astronautical Federation, the Committee on Space Research and the International Institute of Space Law Progress in space science, technology and applications, international cooperation and space law UNITED NATIONS New York, 2011 UniTEd NationS PUblication Sales no.
    [Show full text]
  • For Immediate Release: TWO GOOGLE LUNAR XPRIZE
    Media Contact: Kyoko Yonezawa [email protected] For Immediate Release: TWO GOOGLE LUNAR XPRIZE TEAMS ANNOUNCE RIDESHARE PARTNERSHIP FOR MISSION TO THE MOON IN 2016 Team HAKUTO (Japan) and Team Astrobotic (U.S.) Plan Cooperative Launch in Pursuit of $30 Million Prize to Land a Private Spacecraft on the Lunar Surface TOKYO, Japan (February 24, 2015) – HAKUTO, the only Japanese team competing for the $30 million Google Lunar XPRIZE, has announced a contract with fellow competitor, Astrobotic, based in Pittsburgh, Pa., to carry a pair of rovers to the moon. Astrobotic plans to launch its Google Lunar XPRIZE mission on a SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket from Cape Canaveral, Fla., during the second half of 2016. HAKUTO’s twin rovers, Moonraker and Tetris, will piggyback on Astrobotic's Griffin lander to reach the lunar surface. Upon touchdown, the rovers will be released simultaneously with Astrobotic’s Andy rover, developed by Carnegie Mellon University, travel 500 meters on the moon’s surface and send high-definition images and video back to Earth, all in pursuit of the $20M Google Lunar XPRIZE Grand Prize. Last month, both teams were awarded Google Lunar XPRIZE Milestone Prizes: HAKUTO won $500,000 for technological advancements in the Mobility category, while Astrobotic, in partnership with Carnegie Mellon University, won a total of $1.75M for innovations in all three focus areas—Landing, Mobility and Imaging. Throughout the judging process, all three rovers, Moonraker, Tetris and Andy, demonstrated the ability to move 500 meters across the lunar surface and withstand the high radiation environment and extreme temperatures on the moon.
    [Show full text]