Living cells on the move
Ricard Alert1, 2 and Xavier Trepat3, 4, 5, 6 1Lewis-Sigler Institute for Integrative Genomics, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA 2Princeton Center for Theoretical Science, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA 3Institute for Bioengineering of Catalonia, The Barcelona Institute for Science and Technology (BIST), Barcelona, Spain, 08028 4Facultat de Medicina, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain, 08036 5Institucio´ Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avanc¸ats (ICREA), Barcelona, Spain, 08028 6Centro de Investigacion´ Biomedica´ en Red en Bioingenier´ıa, Biomateriales y Nanomedicina, Barcelona, Spain, 08028 (Dated: June 8, 2021) Spectacular collective phenomena such as jamming, turbulence, wetting and waves emerge when living cells migrate in groups.
Much like birds fly in flocks and fish swim in swarms, cells tasizing. Finally, collective cell migration is also involved in in our body move in groups. Collective cell migration enables maintaining the inner surface of the gut, which is the fastest embryonic development, wound healing and cancer cell inva- self-renewing tissue in mammals. It renews entirely every 3- sion. These phenomena involve complex biochemical regula- 5 days, which implies a daily loss of tens of grams of cells. tion, but their dynamics can ultimately be predicted by emerg- Self-renewal proceeds thanks to the division of stem cells that ing physical principles of living matter. reside at the bottom of tissue invaginations called crypts. The progeny of these stem cells then migrates collectively from the When and where do cells migrate in groups? crypt to the top of finger-like protrusions called villi, where When seen at the microscale, our body is a busy maze filled they are shed into the intestinal lumen and discarded (Fig. 1b). with actively moving cells. Cellular movements are slow, Collective cell migration is regulated by a myriad of molec- rarely exceeding 10 µm/min, but crucial to embryonic devel- ular processes, from genetic programs to sensing and signal- opment, the immune response, tissue self-renewal and wound ing pathways. Yet, these molecular processes act upon a lim- healing. Through the same mechanisms that sustain these ited number of physical quantities to determine cell move- physiological functions, cell movements drive devastating dis- ment. Therefore, coarse-grained physical approaches may eases such as acute inflammation and cancer. These can in provide crucial insight into biological questions. Furthermore, fact be considered diseases of cell movement because arrest- collective cell behaviors also inspire new physical theories of ing cells in a controlled manner would be sufficient to prevent living systems. In this article, we highlight progress in this their spread. Take cancer as an example; whereas its origin direction. is well-known to be genetic, if we could selectively stop the movement of tumor cells, we would prevent them from escap- Cell assemblies as living matter ing primary tumors and reach distant organs to metastasize. What physical principles underlie collective cell motion? In Understanding cell migration is therefore crucial to improve traditional condensed matter, interactions between electrons current strategies to fight disease. and between atomic nuclei give rise to fascinating collective Cell migration comes in different flavors. Some cell types phenomena such as magnetism and superconductivity. Anal- move as isolated self-propelled particles. For example, to ogously, cell-cell interactions lead to emergent collective phe- chase and destroy pathogens, immune cells move individually nomena in migrating cell groups. However, when treating cell through tissue pores. Similarly, in some types of cancer, single colonies as materials, we must take into account some key fea- cells dissociate from tumors and travel solo through the sur- tures of living matter, as we illustrate throughout the article. rounding tissue, eventually reaching blood vessels and metas- First, the primary constituents of living tissues are cells and tasizing at distant organs. By contrast, in other physiological extracellular networks of protein fibers such as collagen. The functions and pathological conditions, cells move as collec- interactions between these mesoscale constituents are orders tives. Collective cell movements are dominant in embryo de- of magnitude weaker than interatomic interactions in conven- velopment, where they enable the precise positioning of tis- tional solids. So, with notable exceptions like bone, most bio- arXiv:2106.02752v1 [physics.bio-ph] 4 Jun 2021 sues and organ progenitors. The later coordination of growth logical tissues are soft materials, which can easily deform and and motion shapes organs well into postnatal life. Collective flow. cell migration also drives wound healing in tissues such as the Second, cells are machines with internal engines. Special- skin. Here, a continuous sheet of tightly adhered cells moves ized proteins known as molecular motors harness the energy cohesively over the damaged area to restore a functional tis- of chemical reactions to generate forces and produce mechan- sue. Cancer invasion also involves the migration of cell sheets, ical work. These energy-transducing molecular processes ul- strands and clusters (Fig. 1a). Within these groups, cells with timately power cell migration, allowing cells to move au- different function can self-organize in spatial compartments tonomously, without externally applied forces. This contin- to behave like an aberrant organ. This added functionality uous supply of energy drives living tissues out of thermody- is thought to provide malignant tumors with distinct invasive namic equilibrium. Importantly, the driving is local; it occurs strategies that improve their chances of spreading and metas- at the level of individual constituents, i.e. single cells. In 2
a b 50 μm
50 μm
Figure 1 Collective cell migration in the human body. (a) Breast cancer cells from a patient sample of invasive ductal carcinoma migrate collectively into the surrounding extracellular matrix. Colors label cell nuclei (green), the cell-cell adhesion protein E-cadherin (red), and collagen fibers (white). From O. Ilina et al. Dis. Model. Mech. 11, dmm034330, 2018. (b) Intestine cells migrate as indicated by the white arrows to enable fast renewal of the inner surface of the gut. Colors label cell nuclei (blue), goblet cells (pink), the cell-cell adhesion protein p120 (green), and lysosomes (white). The image was kindly shared by Kristen A. Engevik. See also D. Krndija et al. Science 365, 705 (2019).
other words, cells are active constituents, and living tissues in terms of areas Ai and perimeters Pi of cells i = 1,...,N are a paradigmatic example of active matter — an exploding as new field in nonequilibrium statistical physics. N X κ 2 Γ 2 But cells are not only mechanically active: they also sense = (Ai A0) + (Pi P0) . (1) H 2 − 2 − their environment, process information, and respond by adapt- i=1 ing their behavior. For example, stem cells plated on sub- This energy assumes that cells resist changes in their area and strates of different stiffness differentiate into distinct cell perimeter around the preferred values A and P with elastic types, from brain to bone cells. So living tissues are adap- 0 0 moduli κ and Γ, respectively. The preferred perimeter P de- tive: they respond in programmed ways to environmental cues 0 pends on cell-cell interactions and cellular activity, with cell- such as external forces, the mechanical properties of the extra- cell adhesion promoting longer edges and cellular tension fa- cellular matrix, and concentrations of nutrients and signaling voring shorter edges. The preferred perimeter and area de- molecules. Consequently, cell-cell and cell-environment in- fine a dimensionless parameter p = P /√A which informs teractions are often very complex. Unlike atoms and electrons 0 0 0 about the preferred cell shape. Higher p corresponds to more in conventional condensed matter, cellular interactions cannot 0 elongated cells, and smaller p corresponds to more isotropic in general be fully described via an interaction potential with a 0 shapes, with less perimeter for the same area. fixed functional form. Thus, a key challenge in this field is to For a given p , edge lengths vary until the system reaches find effective ways to capture complex cell behaviors in terms 0 its ground state, minimizing the energy in Eq. (1). In this pro- of simple, physically-motivated interactions1. cess, an edge can shrink until it eventually disappears, leading to the formation of a new cell-cell interface (Fig. 2c). These To flow or not to flow events, known as T1 transitions, allow cells to change neigh- One way to think about interactions between deformable bors, driving topological rearrangements of the cellular net- epithelial cells comes from the physics of foams. In foams, work. The ability to reorganize its constituents determines gas bubbles arrange in polygonal packings, with the liquid whether a material is solid or fluid. So, if cell rearrangements phase filling the interstitial spaces and providing surface ten- are difficult, the cellular network resists shear deformations; sion to bubble interfaces (Fig. 2a). Similarly, cells in epithe- the tissue is solid. In contrast, if cells can rearrange easily, the lial monolayers also acquire polygonal shapes, with roughly network yields upon shear; the tissue is fluid. At small p0, i.e. straight edges subject to active tension generated inside cells for roundish cells, Eq. (1) reveals that there is an energy bar- (Fig. 2b). This description of tissues as polygonal cell pack- rier preventing T1 rearrangements (Fig. 2c). However, as we ings traces back to work by Hisao Honda and collaborators increase p0 and cells become more elongated, the energy bar- ∗ in 1980, and it was later popularized by work in the group rier decreases (Fig. 2c). At a critical value of p0 = p0 3.81, of Frank Julicher¨ and collaborators3. Because cells are de- the barrier vanishes (Fig. 2d); cells can rearrange freely≈2. formable, edge lengths vary dynamically. These variations This simple model thus predicts a solid-fluid transition change the energy of the cellular network, which we can write in tissues driven by changes in cell shape, encoded in p0 NATURE PHYSICS DOI: 10.1038/NPHYS3471 ARTICLES
abvalue of p0 and r tested, we obtained the distribution of energy REVIEW1.5 r = A 0.5 RTICLE | INSIGHT⇢(1") REVIEWhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-018-0194-9 ARTICLE | INSIGHTbarrier heights . The functional form of the distributionNATURE PHYSICS r = 0.1 becomes universal (Fig. 1a) when scaled by the mean energy 100 1.0 1"( )
) r = 1 barrier height r,p0 . The rescaled distribution is fitted well by a Box 2 | " Mechanobiology as a multiscale problem k k 1 ! ! −1 k-gamma distribution (k x exp( kx)/(k 1) )withx 1"/1" / 10 ! =
! 0.5 r = 2 ( One the great challenges of mechanobiologyand k is the2.2 existence0.2. The of k-gamma!ese distribution models capture has fundamental been observed rheological properties # −2 10 = ± 30–32 """ multiple lengthr = 10scales at which relevant inmechanisms many non-biological are at play. disorderedof cells such systems as strain-sti, and"ening, generically scale-free elastic modulus, ! 130,131 31,32 10−3 !is problem0.0 has led to the development resultsof diverse from types maximizing of mod- the entropy$uidization subject and to ageing constraints. . This 0123456elling approach3.0 3.2 describing 3.4 3.6 biological3.8 4.0 tissuesconfirms at di that"erent the scales. distribution 3. Vertex of energy models barriers treat cell depends monolayers on theas 2D or 3D polygonal p0 x = !"/!" Examples of mechanical models of cellssingle-cell and tissues properties include thep0 and r onlyobjects through that share its averagecommon1" vertices. (see also Box 3) (c,g following. Figure 1b shows the dependencein #gure of below).1" on Inp0 threefor various dimensions, values these models are Figure 1 | Energy barriers for local cellular rearrangements. a, Illustration 1. Clutch models describe the dynamics of cell–matrixr.Atp0 . 3.8,adhe the- energy barriersgoverned are by always tissue finite—thatgeometry and is, by cells surface tensions of of a T1 transition in a confluent tissue andsion the at normalized the molecular distribution level (a,⇢e inof #guremust below). put ! iney some take into amount of workthe apico-basal to deform (!ab and) and rearrange. lateral surfaces Here (!l). Vertex models normalized energy barrier heights 1"/1"accountfor a large the rigidity range of of parameters the matrix, the binding/unbindingthe tissue behaves (kon like, a solid;have it ispredicted a rigid dynamic material aspects with aof finite monolayers, such as their (r 0.5,1,2 and p0 3.2–3.7). They havek ao" universal) rates of shapeadhesion that proteins is fitted and well the force that myosin motors ability to deform through intercalation, to jam at constant = = yield stress. As p0 is increased, the energy barriers decrease and 82,83,86,87,132 by a k-gamma distribution (solid line), indicatingexert on thatthese1" proteinscompletely through the actinbecome cytoskeleton. vanishingly Clutch small indensity the vicinity and to of $ockp as 3.8,solids so and that liquids cell . models have been successful at predicting traction forces and 4. Continuum models0 ⇡describe tissues as active materials in specifies the distribution and describes the mechanical response. b, 1" as rearrangements cost almost no energy. This suggests that the vertex dynamics of the leading edge of a protruding cell, sensing of which the cellular structure is coarse-grained (d,f in #gure function of the target shape index p0 for various values of the inverse rigidity and matrix ligand spacing, andmodel durotaxis may4,56, undergo57. a critical rigiditybelow). ! transitionese models near arep formulated0 3.8. in terms of continuum perimeter modulus r. ⇡ 2. Polymer network models are based on theTo polymeric test this nature hypothesis, wevectorial searched and tensorial for a scaling #elds such collapse as velocity, v, polarity p of the cytoskeleton (b,f in #gure below).based !ey on take theories into ac for- continuousand stress phase ". transitions !ese variables near are a criticallinked through viscosity and p P /pA is the target shape index or a preferred perimeter- point, such as the Ising model for ferromagnetism. Figure 1b 0 = 0 0 count the properties of single #laments, their spacing (df in #, elasticity k and friction $. In three dimensions, they also to-area ratio. For simplicity, we focuspanel on p f0 below),>0. For thep0 deformability<0 there are anddemonstrates binding rates of that polyr- sets theincorporate overall scale luminal of 1" pressureas well ! P as. Continuum the models have two regimes: a static regime with resultsmer identicalcrosslinking to thoseproteins presented (kon, ko" in panel‘sharpness’ f), and of the the activity transition, whereassuccessfullyp0 controls described the complex distance features to the of cell monolayers 76,133 here for 0