Building & Measuring
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Department of Environmental Studies DISSERTATION COMMITTEE PAGE The undersigned have examined the dissertation entitled: “Building & Measuring Psychological Capacity for Biodiversity Conservation”, presented by Kayla A. Cranston, candidate for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, and hereby certify that it is accepted* Committee Co-Chair: Carol D. Saunders, Ph.D. Research Faculty Antioch University New England Committee Co-Chair: Beth A. Kaplin, Ph.D. Core Faculty Antioch University New England; University of Rwanda Committee Member: Jean Kayira, Ph.D. Core Faculty and Associate Director of Doctoral Program in Environmental Studies, Antioch University New England Committee Member: Raymond De Young, Ph.D. Associate Professor, University of Michigan Defense Date: May 13, 2016 Date Submitted to the Registrar’s Office: *Signatures are on file with the Registrar’s Office, Antioch University New England. Building & Measuring Psychological Capacity for Biodiversity Conservation by Kayla A. Cranston A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Environmental Studies at Antioch University New England 2016 © 2016 by Kayla A. Cranston All rights reserved. Acknowledgements Thank you to Dr. Carol Saunders for offering the wisdom and guidance that made this dissertation possible. Because of you, I have found my true calling in Conservation Psychology. Thank you to Dr. Beth Kaplin for encouraging me to apply my expertise to real-world challenges in capacity building and for introducing me to the leaders and organizations that made that possible. Thank you to Dr. Raymond De Young for your expertise and keen eye for nuance throughout this process. Thank you to Dr. Jean Kayira for offering your critical perspective and at the most essential time. Thank you to the members and staff of the Regional Network for Conservation Educators in the Albertine Rift for your inspiration and participation, which allowed my research to be grounded in reality. Thank you to Dr Rosie Trevelyan, Anthony Kuria, and Francine Madden for guiding my data collection with the Tropical Biology Association and Human Wildlife Conflict Collaboration alumni. Thank you to Tropical Biology Association and Human Wildlife Conflict Collaboration training alumni for the insight you offered into your personal experiences of the capacity building process. Thank you to Dr. Michael Sutherland for guiding and supporting me with alacrity throughout the data analysis process. I am grateful to my fellow classmates, faculty, staff and administration at Antioch University New England for your encouragement and support. I could write an entire dissertation on the many ways in which I am grateful for my family’s support throughout this process. I extend special thanks to my sisters, Elli and Jennie, for fielding my many existential crises calls throughout the years and to my partner, Gabriel, for his love and support every day on the front lines with me. i Abstract Capacity building has become the centerpiece of recent attempts to strengthen regional biodiversity conservation. Many conservation organizations aim to increase this capacity by training local conservation professionals. While many practitioners will agree that these trainings presumably have a psychological effect on their participants that may benefit long-term local action toward conservation goals, there also seems to be a resignation that these effects are difficult if not impossible to measure and target, especially within diverse cultures. The common result is a perfunctory evaluation of observable behaviors or basic knowledge, which may be easy to count but undoubtedly fails to represent the nuance of complex psychological variables associated with long- term capacity to conserve biodiversity. My dissertation is fundamentally aimed at investigating capacity for biodiversity conservation at this psychological level. Specifically, I explored the current understanding of capacity for biodiversity conservation and how this understanding can be supplemented by psychological theory to strengthen the development, evaluation, and prediction of this capacity over time. I did this within the context of case studies that focus on three separate populations of conservation professionals who participated in capacity building trainings in Africa and North America between 1994 and 2014. I administered surveys to these conservation professionals to create and validate an instrument that measures the construct I call psychological capacity for biodiversity conservation (PCBC). PCBC includes psychological dimensions such as meaningful ownership, effective autonomy, being needed, group effectiveness, and understanding. I administered the PCBC survey instrument to training alumni and conducted interviews with their trainers to the evaluate ii the effectiveness of the capacity building methods at increasing PCBC directly after and two to ten years after a training. I found that meaningful ownership, effective autonomy, and being needed predicted 34% of the variance in long-term capacity behavior in conservation professionals after training. I recommend specific training methods that I found to significantly increase these dimensions of PCBC. Together, these results offer a novel approach to capacity development and evaluation and a psychometric instrument that can be used to predict long-term capacity for biodiversity conservation in a diverse population of conservation professionals. iii Table of Contents Acknowledgements ....................................................................................................................... i Abstract ......................................................................................................................................... ii List of Tables ................................................................................................................................ vi List of Figures ............................................................................................................................... vii Chapter 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................. 1 References for Chapter 1 .......................................................................................................... 9 Chapter 2. Literature Review ........................................................................................................ 13 Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 13 Defining Capacity Building for Biodiversity Conservation ..................................................... 17 Individual Capacity for Biodiversity Conservation .................................................................. 23 A Psychological Lens on Individual Capacity for Biodiversity Conservation ......................... 28 References for Chapter 2 .......................................................................................................... 35 Chapter 3. Willing & able: Measuring the effectiveness of training methods to build psychological capacity for biodiversity conservation .................................................................. 40 Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 40 Literature Review...................................................................................................................... 44 Methodology ............................................................................................................................. 50 Data Collection ......................................................................................................................... 51 Analysis..................................................................................................................................... 56 Results ....................................................................................................................................... 58 Discussion ................................................................................................................................. 73 References for Chapter 3 .......................................................................................................... 85 Chapter 4. Building durable capacity: Training methods to increase the psychological dimensions that predict long-term capacity for biodiversity conservation ................................... 93 Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 93 Literature Review...................................................................................................................... 94 Methodology ............................................................................................................................. 97 Data Collection ......................................................................................................................... 100 Analysis..................................................................................................................................... 103 Results ....................................................................................................................................... 106 Discussion ................................................................................................................................