Committing to Conservation the World Zoo and Aquarium Conservation Strategy Mountain Gorilla Rwanda Mission Statement
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
The Living World
1 The Living World MultipleChoiceQuestions (MCQs) 1 As we go from species to kingdom in a taxonomic hierarchy, the number of common characteristics (a)willdecrease (b)willincrease (c)remainsame (d) mayincreaseordecrease Ans. (a) Lower the taxa, more are the characteristic that the members within the taxon share. So, lowest taxon share the maximum number of morphological similarities, while its similarities decrease as we move towards the higher hierarchy, i.e., class, kingdom. Thus,restoftheoptionareincorrect. 2 Which of the following ‘suffixes’ used for units of classification in plants indicates a taxonomic category of ‘family’? (a) − Ales (b) − Onae (c) − Aceae (d) − Ae K ThinkingProcess Biological classification of organism is a process by which any living organism is classified into convenient categories based on some common observable characters. The categoriesareknownas taxons. Ans. (c) The name of a family, a taxon, in plants always end with suffixes aceae, e.g., Solanaceae, Cannaceae and Poaceae. Ales suffix is used for taxon ‘order’ while ae suffix is used for taxon ‘class’ and onae suffixesarenotusedatallinanyofthetaxons. 3 The term ‘systematics’ refers to (a)identificationandstudyoforgansystems (b)identificationandpreservationofplantsandanimals (c)diversityofkindsoforganismsandtheirrelationship (d) studyofhabitatsoforganismsandtheirclassification K ThinkingProcess The planet earth is full of variety of different forms of life. The number of species that are named and described are between 1.7-1.8 million. As we explore new areas, new organisms are continuously being identified, named and described on scientific basis of systematicslaiddownbytaxonomists. 1 2 (Class XI) Solutions Ans. (c) The word systematics is derived from Latin word ‘Systema’ which means systematic arrangement of organisms. Linnaeus used ‘Systema Naturae’ as a title of his publication. -
Conservation Psychology: a Gap in Current Australian Undergraduate Psychology Education?
Sustainability 2013, 5, 1266-1281; doi:10.3390/su5031266 OPEN ACCESS sustainability ISSN 2071-1050 www.mdpi.com/journal/sustainability Article Conservation Psychology: A Gap in Current Australian Undergraduate Psychology Education? Elissa Pearson School of Psychology, Social Work & Social Policy, University of South Australia, GPO Box 2471, Adelaide, South Australia 5001, Australia; E-Mail: [email protected]; Tel.: +61-8-8302-4843 Received: 20 December 2013; in revised form: 7 March 2013 / Accepted: 7 March 2013 / Published: 19 March 2013 Abstract: Human actions have contributed to numerous environmental challenges, including climate change and a significant loss of the world‘s biodiversity. As the scientific study of human thought and behaviour, psychology has much to offer in better understanding these issues, as well as fostering greater sustainability in human actions. Yet, despite this recognition, and increasing calls from leaders in psychology education to produce graduates capable of applying their disciplinary knowledge to such real-world issues to solve worldwide behaviourally-based problems; this may not be adequately addressed in current psychology training. The present study assessed the content of all APAC (Australian Psychology Accreditation Council) approved psychology programs within Australia to determine the proportion which offered a psychology-focused course (unit) specifically in conservation or sustainability. Based on the data advertised through each university website, it appears that only one of 39 programs currently offers such a course, with one other university implementing a conservation psychology course in 2013. Thus 95% of current APAC-accredited programs in Australia do not have a strong focus on training psychology graduates to contribute to addressing these important issues. -
To Download the Full Report
June 10, 2013 This report was funded by the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation. We thank the foundation and project officers Kate Wing, Meaghan Calcari Campbell, and Eric Jacobsen for their support. The final draft has benefitted enormously from the expertise of our reviewers—Michael Mascia (World Wildlife Fund), Carol Saunders (Antioch University), and Diana Liverman (University of Arizona). Thank you also to Karin Schwartz (George Mason University) for her research assistance, and Ryan Richards for his editorial review. All errors are those of the authors. Karen Akerlof, PhD Center for Climate Change Communication George Mason University 4400 University Dr., MS6A8 Fairfax, VA 22030 [email protected] Chris Kennedy, PhD Department of Environmental Science and Policy George Mason University 4400 University Dr., MS5F2 Fairfax, VA 22030 [email protected] Cover photo ‘Earth & Sky’ by Marco Beltrametti (www.mbeo.ch) under Creative Commons license 2 Contents Executive summary .......................................................................................................................... i Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 1 Traditional policies for changing behavior ..................................................................................... 3 "Soft" policies for behavioral change ............................................................................................. 6 Distilling lessons for evidence-based practice -
I Am a Compassionate Conservation Welfare Scientist
Opinion I Am a Compassionate Conservation Welfare Scientist: Considering the Theoretical and Practical Differences Between Compassionate Conservation and Conservation Welfare Ngaio J. Beausoleil Animal Welfare Science and Bioethics Centre, School of Veterinary Science, Massey University, Private Bag 11-222, Palmerston North 4410, New Zealand; [email protected] Received: 25 October 2019; Accepted: 28 January 2020; Published: 6 February 2020 Simple Summary: The well-being of individual wild animals is threatened in many ways, including by activities aiming to conserve species, ecosystems and biodiversity, i.e., conservation activities. Scientists working in two related disciplines, Compassionate Conservation and Conservation Welfare, are attentive to the well-being of individual wild animals. The purpose of this essay is to highlight the commonalities between these disciplines and to consider key differences, in order to stimulate discussion among interested parties and use our collective expertise and energy to best effect. An emerging scenario, the use of genetic technologies for control of introduced animals, is used to explore the ways each discipline might respond to novel conservation-related threats to wild animal well-being. Abstract: Compassionate Conservation and Conservation Welfare are two disciplines whose practitioners advocate consideration of individual wild animals within conservation practice and policy. However, they are not, as is sometimes suggested, the same. Compassionate Conservation and Conservation Welfare are based on different underpinning ethics, which sometimes leads to conflicting views about the kinds of conservation activities and decisions that are acceptable. Key differences between the disciplines appear to relate to their views about which wild animals can experience harms, the kinds of harms they can experience and how we can know about and confidently evidence those harms. -
Read and Download Our New Report Here
A report to the Labour Animal Welfare Society May 2021 A review of the animal welfare, public health, and environmental, ecological and conservation implications of rearing, releasing and shooting non-native gamebirds in Britain Professor Stephen Harris BSc PhD DSc A REPORT TO THE LABOUR ANIMAL WELFARE SOCIETY A review of the animal welfare, public health, and environmental, ecological and conservation implications of rearing, releasing and shooting non-native gamebirds in Britain A report to the Labour Animal Welfare Society Professor Stephen Harris BSc PhD DSc May 2021 NON-NATIVE GAMEBIRDS IN BRITAIN - A REVIEW A REPORT TO THE LABOUR ANIMAL WELFARE SOCIETY Instructions Contents I was asked to review the scientific I was told that:- Summary of the key points 1 evidence on:- l I should identify any animal welfare concerns Sources of information 5 and potential effects on wildlife and public 1. The potential welfare and public health issues Introduction 6 associated with rearing, releasing and shooting health large numbers of non-native gamebirds in l I should identify the actual or potential The legal status of non-native gamebirds in Britain 7 Britain direct and indirect effects of activities Good-practice guidelines for gamebird shooting 10 2. Whether rearing and releasing large numbers associated with rearing, releasing and shooting gamebirds, and the distances of non-native gamebirds in Britain, and How many foxes are there in Britain? 12 associated predator-control activities, have an that may be required for any precautionary actions, prohibitions or mitigation impact on the numbers of different species How much food do foxes require? 16 of avian and mammalian predators, and the l I should consider any potential environmental, character and extent of any possible species ecological and/or conservation impacts of The number of pheasants and red-legged partridges 17 interactions widespread supplementary feeding by the reared, released and shot in Britain 3. -
MAC1 Abstracts – Oral Presentations
Oral Presentation Abstracts OP001 Rights, Interests and Moral Standing: a critical examination of dialogue between Regan and Frey. Rebekah Humphreys Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom This paper aims to assess R. G. Frey’s analysis of Leonard Nelson’s argument (that links interests to rights). Frey argues that claims that animals have rights or interests have not been established. Frey’s contentions that animals have not been shown to have rights nor interests will be discussed in turn, but the main focus will be on Frey’s claim that animals have not been shown to have interests. One way Frey analyses this latter claim is by considering H. J. McCloskey’s denial of the claim and Tom Regan’s criticism of this denial. While Frey’s position on animal interests does not depend on McCloskey’s views, he believes that a consideration of McCloskey’s views will reveal that Nelson’s argument (linking interests to rights) has not been established as sound. My discussion (of Frey’s scrutiny of Nelson’s argument) will centre only on the dialogue between Regan and Frey in respect of McCloskey’s argument. OP002 Can Special Relations Ground the Privileged Moral Status of Humans Over Animals? Robert Jones California State University, Chico, United States Much contemporary philosophical work regarding the moral considerability of nonhuman animals involves the search for some set of characteristics or properties that nonhuman animals possess sufficient for their robust membership in the sphere of things morally considerable. The most common strategy has been to identify some set of properties intrinsic to the animals themselves. -
Psychological Knowledge Relevant to Leadership in Wildlife Conservation
Open Journal of Leadership, 2019, 8, 114-141 https://www.scirp.org/journal/ojl ISSN Online: 2167-7751 ISSN Print: 2167-7743 Psychological Knowledge Relevant to Leadership in Wildlife Conservation Simon A. Black Durrell Institute for Conservation and Ecology, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK How to cite this paper: Black, S. A. (2019). Abstract Psychological Knowledge Relevant to Lea- dership in Wildlife Conservation. Open Jo- This study aims to identify whether a published leadership framework rec- urnal of Leadership, 8, 114-141. ommended for conservation professionals aligns with knowledge established https://doi.org/10.4236/ojl.2019.83007 in the wealth of literature relating to the New Psychology of Leadership. Received: July 19, 2019 Wildlife conservation involves the protection and recovery of endangered Accepted: September 20, 2019 species, landscape protection or ecosystem reconstruction and is a sector in Published: September 23, 2019 which leaders face complex systems of resource constraints, socio-political Copyright © 2019 by author(s) and resistance and technical challenges. The literature on conservation leadership Scientific Research Publishing Inc. has grown in recent years but is rarely linked to an understanding of psy- This work is licensed under the Creative chology. Studies have shown difficulties arising when a traditional power-based Commons Attribution International leadership approach is applied to conservation. Current psychological litera- License (CC BY 4.0). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ ture addressing leadership offers suitable alternatives to the traditional ap- Open Access proach. This review identifies practical psychological research relating to competences including budgeting, planning, experimentation, training, gov- ernance and performance measurement as well as more obvious personal competences of interpersonal skills, vision, empowerment, cultural sensitiv- ity. -
The Living World Components & Interrelationships Management
What is an Ecosystem? Biome’s climate and plants An ecosystem is a system in which organisms interact with each other and Biome Location Temperature Rainfall Flora Fauna with their environment. Tropical Centred along the Hot all year (25-30°C) Very high (over Tall trees forming a canopy; wide Greatest range of different animal Ecosystem’s Components rainforest Equator. 200mm/year) variety of species. species. Most live in canopy layer Abiotic These are non-living, such as air, water, heat and rock. Tropical Between latitudes 5°- 30° Warm all year (20-30°C) Wet + dry season Grasslands with widely spaced Large hoofed herbivores and Biotic These are living, such as plants, insects, and animals. grasslands north & south of Equator. (500-1500mm/year) trees. carnivores dominate. Flora Plant life occurring in a particular region or time. Hot desert Found along the tropics Hot by day (over 30°C) Very low (below Lack of plants and few species; Many animals are small and of Cancer and Capricorn. Cold by night 300mm/year) adapted to drought. nocturnal: except for the camel. Fauna Animal life of any particular region or time. Temperate Between latitudes 40°- Warm summers + mild Variable rainfall (500- Mainly deciduous trees; a variety Animals adapt to colder and Food Web and Chains forest 60° north of Equator. winters (5-20°C) 1500m /year) of species. warmer climates. Some migrate. Simple food chains are useful in explaining the basic principles Tundra Far Latitudes of 65° north Cold winter + cool Low rainfall (below Small plants grow close to the Low number of species. -
Conservation Psychology -- Fall 2015 V.1 Lewis & Clark Graduate School of Education and Counseling
Syllabus: Conservation Psychology -- Fall 2015 v.1 Lewis & Clark Graduate School of Education and Counseling Course Number: CPSY-590-03 / CECP-866-03 Term: Fall 2015 Department: Counseling Psychology / Center for Community Engagement Faculty Name: Thomas Joseph Doherty, Psy.D. Faculty Contact Info Cell/Text: 503-866-1323 / [email protected] Course Calendar & Meeting Times: Days: Class Meetings • Sat 11/7/15 from 9:00 AM - 5:00PM • Sun 11/8/15 from 9:00 AM - 5:00 PM Location: York Graduate Center, Room 115 / 107 Catalog Description: Conservation psychology is an interdisciplinary field that explores the psychological basis of human’s care for nature and motivation toward conservation and sustainability. The course provides a background on the development of conservation psychology and survey of topics including psychological benefits of contact with nature, nature and lifespan development, environmental identity and behavior, social justice, influencing conservation action, hope and resilience, and strategic messaging and communications. The instructor will provide examples from the US and abroad. Conservation roles for mental health counselors, environmental educators and sustainability professionals will be explored. The course includes online, in-person and field-based activities. Background: Conservation psychology is an interdisciplinary field that applies psychological knowledge and research to promote people’s care for nature and their motivation toward environmental conservation and sustainability. The field coalesced in the -
Evaluating the Potential for Species Reintroductions in Canada
Evaluating the Potential for Species Reintroductions in Canada JAY V. GEDIR, TIAN EVEREST, AND AXEL MOEHRENSCHLAGER Centre for Conservation Research, Calgary Zoo, 1300 Zoo Road NE, Calgary, AB, T2E 7V6, Canada, email [email protected] Abstract: Species reintroductions and translocations are increasingly useful conservation tools for restoring endangered populations around the world. We examine ecological and socio- political variables to assess Canada’s potential for future reintroductions. Biologically ideal species would be prolific, terrestrial, herbivorous, behaviorally simple, charismatic, easily tractable, or large enough to carry transmitters for post-release evaluations, and would have small home range requirements. Sociologically, Canada’s large geographic area, low human density, high urban population, widespread protectionist views towards wildlife, and sound economic status should favor reintroduction success. Canada has implemented legislation to safeguard species at risk and, compared to developing countries, possesses substantial funds to support reintroduction efforts. We support the reintroduction guidelines put forth by the World Conservation Union (IUCN) but realize that several challenges regarding these parameters will unfold in Canada’s future. Pressures from the rates of species loss and climate change may precipitate situations where species would need to be reintroduced into areas outside their historic range, subspecific substitutions would be necessary if taxonomically similar individuals are unavailable, -
April Zpm 2011
Linking Wildlife Conservation and Wildlife Welfare: Educator Training Workshop Report B.A. Daniel1, R. Marimuthu2 and S. Walker3 Universities Federation for Animal educational packet called Conservation Welfare (UFAW) based in Gt. Britain, Consciousness linking wildlife works to promote and develop improvements in animal welfare with scientific research and creating awareness globally. UFAW takes a practical approach knowing that certain types of research are necessary and will be carried out despite any amount of protest. So UFAW devises research Left : The “Old School” based in Great Britain is the Headquarters protocols for urgently required medical of the Universities Federation for and other scientific research which Animal Welfare UFAW cause the least possible discomfort for laboratory animals. UFAW has many programmes; see <www.ufaw.org>. Below: UFAW Council and Founded in 1929 with a tagline of S.Walker at their HQ having a Science in the service of animal discussion over high tea welfare UFAW describes itself as an “internationally recognised, independent, scientific and education animal welfare charity concerned with improving knowledge and understanding of animals' needs in order to promote high standards of welfare for farm, companion, laboratory, captive wild animal and those with which we interact in the wild.” Zoo Outreach Organisation has a very long relationship with UFAW and has been much influenced by their combined philosophy of science and practical approach. With support from UFAW, ZOO organized a two-day educator training programme for selected educators involved in wildlife education and conservation in South India. The training programme was organized at Karunya University Campus during 18-19 February 2011 with the them of making conservation and welfare work together for the benefit of wildlife. -
PORTUGAL Zoo Report FINAL
1 THE EU ZOO INQUIRY 2011 An evaluation of the implementation and enforcement of the EC Directive 1999/22, relating to the keeping of wild animals in zoos PORTUGAL Written for the European coalition ENDCAP by the Born Free Foundation The EU Zoo Inquiry 2011 An evaluation of the implementation and enforcement of the EC Directive 1999/22, relating to the keeping of wild animals in zoos. Country Report Portugal 1 CONTENTS ABBREVIATIONS USED 00 TERMS USED 00 SUMMARY 00 RECOMMENDATIONS 00 THE EU ZOO INQUIRY 2011 INTRODUCTION 00 METHODOLOGY 00 COUNTRY REPORT: PORTUGAL INTRODUCTION 00 RESULTS AND INTERPRETATION 00 GENERAL INFORMATION 00 CONSERVATION 00 EDUCATION 00 EVALUATION OF ANIMAL ENCLOSURES 00 EVALUATION OF ANIMAL WELFARE 00 CONCLUSION 00 REFERENCES 00 Born Free Foundation © July 2011 Report design by Bill Procter Cover photograph by Title page photographs taken at Jardim Zoológico de Lisboa, Zoo da Maia and Zoomarine 2 ABBREVIATIONS USED AIZA……………………………………Iberian Association of Zoos and Aquaria APOS Animal Protection Ordinance of Switzerland 2008 CBD…………………………………….Convention on Biological Diversity CCDR Coordinatoin and Regional Development Commission CEAPZ ……………………………….. Zoo Ethics and Monitoring Commission CITES Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora DEFRA UK Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs DGF Director-General of Forests DGV Director-General of Veterinary Medicine DL59/2003 Decree-Law nº 59/2003 DRAP Regional Directorate of Agriculture and Fisheries, incorporating veterinary