See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/268076924
Some corrections to information provided in “Priority! The Dating of Scientific Names in Ornithology
Article · November 2012
CITATIONS READS 0 81
2 authors, including:
Edward C. Dickinson Aves Press Limited (publishers in zoology)
121 PUBLICATIONS 1,712 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
D'Orbigny's Voyage dans l'Amerique Meridionale . View project
All content following this page was uploaded by Edward C. Dickinson on 15 November 2014.
The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. EdwardȱC.ȱDickinsonȱ&ȱColinȱJonesȱ 75ȱ ZoologicalȱBibliographyȱ2012ȱ2(2&3)ȱ
Someȱcorrectionsȱtoȱinformationȱprovidedȱinȱ“Priority!ȱTheȱ DatingȱofȱScientificȱNamesȱinȱOrnithology”ȱ
EdwardȱC.ȱDickinsonȱ&ȱColinȱJonesȱ
COPYRIGHT:ȱ ©ȱ 2012ȱ Dickinsonȱ &ȱ Jones.ȱ Thisȱ isȱ anȱ openȬaccessȱ articleȱ distributedȱ underȱ theȱ termsȱ ofȱ theȱ Creativeȱ Commonsȱ Attributionȱ Licence,ȱ whichȱ permitsȱ unrestrictedȱ use,ȱ distribution,ȱandȱreproductionȱinȱanyȱmedium,ȱprovidedȱtheȱoriginalȱauthorȱandȱsourceȱareȱ credited.
ABSTRACT:ȱTheȱrecentȱreferenceȱworkȱPriority!ȱTheȱDatingȱofȱScientificȱNamesȱinȱOrnithologyȱ containedȱ someȱerrorsȱandȱomittedȱsomeȱexplanationsȱ whichȱ wouldȱ haveȱ beenȱ useful.ȱ Explanationsȱnowȱfeltȱtoȱbeȱinsufficientȱrelateȱtoȱtheȱinterpretationȱofȱtheȱcorrectedȱdatesȱ ofȱpublicationȱofȱworks.ȱChangesȱinȱtheȱdateȱofȱaȱworkȱmayȱnotȱhaveȱaȱdirectȱeffectȱonȱ theȱ dateȱ ofȱ aȱ seeminglyȱ newȱ taxonȱ name;ȱ aȱdescriptionȱ mayȱ haveȱ appearedȱ elsewhereȱ andȱnowȱbeȱearlier;ȱorȱaȱnameȱmayȱloseȱprecedence.ȱAddingȱdetailsȱofȱsuchȱcasesȱwasȱnotȱ attempted,ȱ butȱ hereȱ examplesȱ areȱ givenȱ whichȱ illustrateȱ severalȱ waysȱ inȱ whichȱ suchȱ divergenceȱ canȱ occur.ȱ Alsoȱ includedȱ areȱ someȱ complementaryȱ datesȱ whichȱ reflectȱ anȱ I.C.Z.N.ȱOpinionȱinȱ2003ȱrelatingȱtoȱissuesȱofȱprecedenceȱbetweenȱtheȱProceedingsȱofȱtheȱ ZoologicalȱSocietyȱofȱLondonȱandȱmoreȱrapidȱreportsȱofȱtheȱSociety’sȱmeetingsȱappearingȱinȱ popularȱjournals.ȱ
KEYWORDS:ȱ datesȱ ofȱ publication,ȱ precedence,ȱ Gould,ȱ Proceedingsȱ ofȱ theȱ Zoologicalȱ SocietyȱofȱLondon,ȱcorrections,ȱadvanceȱsheets.ȱ
INTRODUCTIONȱ Itȱisȱsadlyȱtrueȱthatȱalmostȱnoȱbookȱofȱcarefullyȱresearchedȱinformationȱisȱfound,ȱafterȱ publication,ȱ toȱ beȱ completelyȱ satisfactoryȱ toȱ itsȱ authors.ȱ “Priority!ȱ Theȱ Datingȱ ofȱ Scientificȱ NamesȱinȱOrnithology”ȱ(hereafterȱcalledȱ“Priority!”)ȱbyȱDickinsonȱetȱal.ȱ(2011)ȱwasȱsubjectedȱtoȱ thoroughȱinternalȱreviewȱandȱtoȱreferees’ȱcomments,ȱandȱhas,ȱindeed,ȱbeenȱkindlyȱreviewedȱ (Banks,ȱ2012;ȱBarclay,ȱ2012;ȱKnox,ȱ2012),ȱbutȱitȱsometimesȱconveysȱunintendedȱinformationȱ orȱfailedȱtoȱmakeȱclearȱtheȱlimitationsȱimposedȱbyȱitsȱmethodology,ȱandȱitȱdidȱincludeȱsomeȱ errors.ȱOneȱofȱusȱ(CJ)ȱhasȱworkedȱthroughȱtheȱbookȱandȱaskedȱprobingȱquestions.ȱHeȱfoundȱ aȱ varietyȱ ofȱ errors.ȱ Hereȱ weȱ addressȱ mostȱ ofȱ theȱ pointsȱ raised;ȱ theȱ rest,ȱ concerningȱ D’Orbigny’sȱ“Voyageȱdansȱl’Amériqueȱméridionale”,ȱwillȱbeȱcoveredȱinȱaȱsecondȱjointȱpaper.ȱ
PRECEDENCEȱ Inȱ“Priority!”ȱthereȱwasȱaȱtightȱfocusȱonȱtheȱworkȱandȱitsȱdateȱofȱpublication.ȱTableȱLXVIȱ wasȱderivedȱfromȱtheȱresearchȱintoȱtheseȱworks.ȱInȱtheȱIntroductionȱweȱwroteȱ“Ourȱlistsȱofȱ entriesȱdoȱnotȱprovideȱforȱtheȱoccasionalȱneedȱtoȱdetermineȱdatesȱofȱtwoȱdifferentȱworksȱandȱ stateȱ whichȱ hasȱ priority”.ȱ Thisȱ statement,ȱ whileȱ correct,ȱ underplaysȱ theȱ importanceȱ ofȱ rememberingȱtheȱneedȱforȱitȱisȱnotȱasȱrareȱasȱoneȱmightȱsuppose.ȱThusȱTableȱLXVIȱincludedȱ someȱ dateȱ changesȱ thatȱ areȱ reflectiveȱ ofȱ theȱ work,ȱ butȱ whichȱ areȱ notȱ theȱ finalȱ wordȱ asȱ regardsȱtheȱname.ȱBelowȱweȱdemonstrateȱthatȱdualȱpublicationȱofȱanȱauthor’sȱworkȱwasȱnotȱ uncommonȱ(althoughȱtheȱauthorȱmayȱnotȱhaveȱintendedȱthis).ȱInȱaȱfurtherȱsectionȱweȱdrawȱ attentionȱtoȱaȱfewȱcasesȱwhereȱtwoȱauthorsȱpublishedȱtheȱsameȱname.ȱȱ EdwardȱC.ȱDickinsonȱ&ȱColinȱJonesȱ 76ȱ ZoologicalȱBibliographyȱ2012ȱ2(2&3)ȱ
ȱ PARALLELȱPUBLICATIONȱBYȱTHEȱSAMEȱAUTHORȱ Toȱretainȱaȱclearȱlogicȱinȱtheȱmethodologyȱappliedȱinȱ“Priority!”ȱitȱwasȱdecidedȱatȱtheȱ outsetȱ thatȱ theȱ complicationȱ ofȱ parallelȱ publication,ȱ whetherȱ byȱ theȱ authorȱ alone,ȱ orȱ byȱ competingȱauthors,ȱwasȱoutsideȱtheȱscopeȱofȱtheȱbook.ȱThisȱcomplicationȱdidȱreceiveȱbriefȱ mentionȱinȱaȱfewȱcases,ȱbutȱnoȱcommentȱonȱtheȱsubjectȱappearsȱinȱtheȱintroductoryȱchaptersȱ perhapsȱ becauseȱ itȱ wasȱ feltȱ thatȱ suchȱ casesȱ deservedȱ separateȱ publicationȱ inȱ theȱ primaryȱ literature,ȱi.e.ȱinȱpeerȬreviewedȱjournals.ȱConsequentlyȱinȱ“Priority!”ȱeveryȱworkȱexaminedȱ wasȱ approachedȱ withȱ theȱ intentȱ toȱ determineȱ whetherȱ itsȱ dateȱ ofȱ publicationȱ wasȱ knownȱ withȱ certainty,ȱ orȱ someȱ degreeȱ ofȱ certainty,ȱ orȱ not.ȱ Thisȱ couldȱ easilyȱ haveȱ leftȱ theȱ readerȱ believingȱ thatȱ aȱ dateȱ ofȱ publicationȱ accepted,ȱ forȱ thatȱ work,ȱ byȱ Dickinsonȱ etȱ al.ȱ mustȱ beȱ correctȱ forȱ eachȱ newȱ scientificȱ nameȱ withinȱ it,ȱ andȱ theȱ provisionȱ ofȱ Tableȱ LXVIȱ mayȱ haveȱ strengthenedȱthatȱbelief.ȱThatȱparallelȱpublicationȱmadeȱthatȱassumptionȱdangerousȱwasȱnotȱ sufficientlyȱstressed.ȱȱ Theȱ followingȱ examplesȱ illustrateȱ theȱ needȱ toȱ checkȱ thatȱ theȱ presumedȱ dateȱ ofȱ publicationȱofȱaȱworkȱmayȱnotȱbeȱtheȱsameȱasȱtheȱdateȱofȱfirstȱvalidȱappearanceȱofȱaȱnameȱ generallyȱthoughtȱtoȱhaveȱfirstȱappearedȱinȱthatȱwork:ȱ (1) PublicationȱinȱtheȱProceedingsȱofȱtheȱZoologicalȱSocietyȱofȱLondon:ȱInȱ“Priority!”ȱtheȱeditorsȱ referredȱtoȱpublishedȱinformation,ȱsuchȱasȱthatȱofȱDuncanȱ(1937),ȱonȱtheȱtimingȱofȱtheȱ issuesȱofȱtheȱpartsȱofȱeachȱannualȱvolume.ȱForȱtheȱwork,ȱi.e.ȱeachȱpart,ȱthatȱinformationȱisȱ quiteȱ satisfactoryȱ (albeitȱ withȱ minorȱ reservations).ȱ However,ȱ forȱ anyȱ givenȱ nameȱ thatȱ dateȱmayȱnotȱbeȱdeterminativeȱbecauseȱreportsȱofȱtheȱmeetingsȱ–ȱsometimesȱincludingȱ theȱnameȱofȱaȱnewlyȱproposedȱtaxonȱandȱaȱdescription,ȱoftenȱmuchȱshortened,ȱȱappearedȱ daysȱ toȱ monthsȱ beforeȱ theȱ Proceedingsȱ inȱ Theȱ Literaryȱ Gazette,ȱ Theȱ Analyst,ȱ orȱ Theȱ Athenaeumȱorȱsimilarȱjournalsȱ(Bruceȱ&ȱMcAllan,ȱ1991).ȱThisȱparticularlyȱaffectedȱnamesȱ proposedȱbyȱJohnȱGouldȱduringȱtheȱperiodȱ1833ȱtoȱ1870.ȱȱ Theseȱauthorsȱdescribedȱ36ȱsuchȱcasesȱarguingȱforȱpriorityȱtoȱbeȱrespected.ȱThisȱwasȱ seenȱasȱdisruptive,ȱandȱtheȱInternationalȱCommissionȱforȱZoologicalȱNomenclatureȱwasȱ askedȱ byȱ Bockȱ &ȱ Schoddeȱ (1997)ȱ toȱ recogniseȱ theȱ laterȱ formalȱ descriptionsȱ inȱ theȱ Proceedings.ȱEventuallyȱtheȱI.C.Z.N.ȱ(2003)ȱinȱOpinionȱ2026ȱdeniedȱthatȱrequest,ȱstatingȱ thatȱeachȱcaseȱmustȱbeȱconsideredȱonȱitsȱmerits.ȱOneȱreasonȱforȱtheȱapplicationȱtoȱtheȱ Commissionȱwasȱtheȱquestionȱofȱauthorship;ȱwasȱthisȱtoȱpassȱtoȱtheȱanonymousȱreporterȱ whoȱsuppliedȱtheȱreportȱofȱtheȱmeetingȱatȱwhichȱtheȱdescriptionsȱofȱnewȱtaxaȱhadȱbeenȱ read,ȱorȱwasȱitȱtoȱcontinueȱtoȱbeȱseenȱasȱauthoredȱbyȱitsȱoralȱproposer?ȱȱ SubsequentlyȱMcAllanȱ(2004)ȱpublishedȱspecificȱproposalsȱinȱrespectȱofȱtwoȱnamesȱ givenȱtoȱbirdsȱfromȱNewȱZealandȱandȱtheseȱrevisedȱcitationsȱ–ȱnotȱaffectingȱtheȱyearȱofȱ publicationȱ–ȱhaveȱbeenȱacceptedȱ(Gillȱetȱal.,ȱ2010)ȱwithȱGouldȱstillȱtreatedȱasȱtheȱauthor.ȱȱ Takenȱindividually,ȱandȱinȱtheȱspiritȱofȱtheȱI.C.Z.N.’sȱOpinion,ȱaȱnumberȱofȱnamesȱ mainlyȱ fromȱ Australiaȱ andȱ theȱ Americasȱ thatȱ haveȱ aȱ similarȱ historyȱ meritȱ acceptanceȱ basedȱonȱtheȱdatesȱofȱtheȱearlierȱreportsȱinȱoneȱorȱotherȱofȱtheseȱjournals.ȱBecauseȱmostȱ changesȱ relateȱ toȱ priorȱ publicationȱ withinȱ theȱ sameȱ yearȱ fewȱ ofȱ these,ȱ orȱ theȱ Newȱ Zealandȱnames,ȱqualifiedȱforȱlistingȱinȱTableȱLXVIȱinȱtheȱCDȱwithȱ“Priority!”ȱ–ȱbutȱoneȱ didȱandȱwasȱmishandled.ȱItȱwasȱlistedȱinȱtheȱtableȱasȱaȱpaperȱinȱtheȱProceedingsȱforȱ1857ȱ whichȱdidȱnotȱappearȱuntilȱ1858;ȱbutȱ1857ȱnowȱneedsȱacceptance:ȱ EdwardȱC.ȱDickinsonȱ&ȱColinȱJonesȱ 77ȱ ZoologicalȱBibliographyȱ2012ȱ2(2&3)ȱ
ȱ Genericȱnameȱ Specificȱnameȱ Priorȱpublicationȱ PZSȱpublicationȱ Commentȱ
Decemberȱ1857ȱversusȱ Casuariusȱ bennettiȱ 1857ȱ 1858ȱ Januaryȱ1858ȱ ȱ Otherȱ namesȱ whichȱ didȱ notȱ appearȱ inȱ Tableȱ LXVI,ȱ becauseȱ theyȱ relateȱ toȱ priorȱ publication,ȱrequireȱchangeȱinȱtheȱforthcomingȱeditionȱofȱTheȱHowardȱandȱMooreȱCompleteȱ ChecklistȱofȱtheȱBirdsȱofȱtheȱWorld.ȱTheseȱ–ȱrestrictedȱhereȱtoȱthoseȱwhichȱrequireȱaȱchangeȱ inȱtheȱyearȱofȱpublicationȱandȱdoȱnotȱsufferȱaȱchangeȱofȱauthorshipȱ–ȱare:ȱ Odontophorusȱhyperythrusȱfromȱ1858ȱtoȱ1857ȱȱȱ[Americas]ȱ Tetraogallusȱtibetanusȱfromȱ1854ȱtoȱ1853ȱȱȱ[Asia]ȱ Merganettaȱarmataȱfromȱ1842ȱtoȱ1841ȱȱȱ[Americas].ȱSeeȱalsoȱbelow.ȱ Psephotusȱchrysopterygiusȱfromȱ1858ȱtoȱ1857ȱȱȱ[Australia]ȱ Amaziliaȱfranciaeȱcyanocollisȱfromȱ1854ȱtoȱ1853ȱȱȱ[Americas]ȱ Anthocephalaȱfloricepsȱfromȱ1854ȱtoȱ1853ȱȱȱ[Americas]ȱ Coeligenaȱirisȱirisȱfromȱ1854ȱtoȱ1853ȱȱȱ[Americas]ȱ Coeligenaȱirisȱauroraȱfromȱ1854ȱtoȱ1853ȱȱȱ[Americas]ȱ Myrmiaȱmicrouraȱfromȱ1854ȱtoȱ1853ȱȱȱ[Americas]ȱ Aulacorhynchusȱprasinusȱcaeruleogularisȱfromȱ1854ȱtoȱ1853ȱȱȱ[Americas]ȱ Malurusȱcoronatusȱfromȱ1858ȱtoȱ1857ȱȱȱ[Australia]ȱ SERICORNISȱfromȱ1838ȱtoȱ1837ȱȱȱ[Australasia]ȱ Ptilorisȱvictoriaeȱfromȱ1850ȱtoȱ1849ȱȱȱ[Australia]ȱ NoteȱthatȱinȱtheȱcaseȱofȱMerganettaȱweȱhaveȱnotȱaddressedȱhereȱtheȱissueȱofȱtheȱspellingȱ ofȱ theȱ genericȱ name.ȱ Finally,ȱ thereȱ isȱ theȱ caseȱ ofȱ Anserȱ serrirostrisȱ forȱ whichȱ Bruceȱ &ȱ McAllanȱ(1991)ȱproposedȱaȱsignificantȱchangeȱtoȱtheȱdateȱandȱaȱchangeȱofȱauthorȱfromȱ SwinhoeȱtoȱGould.ȱUpȱtoȱnowȱthisȱdoesȱnotȱappearȱtoȱhaveȱbeenȱreȬexaminedȱsinceȱ2003,ȱ butȱtheirȱcaseȱappearsȱirrefutable.ȱ (2) Gould’sȱillustratedȱmonographs,ȱissuedȱinȱpartsȱwithȱdescriptiveȱtextsȱaccompanyingȱhisȱ colourȱplates,ȱwereȱoftenȱparalleledȱbyȱconciseȱpapersȱwithȱtechnicalȱdescriptionsȱbutȱnoȱ illustrationsȱ inȱ theȱ pagesȱ ofȱ theȱ Proceedingsȱ ofȱ theȱ Zoologicalȱ Societyȱ ofȱ London.ȱ Theȱ Proceedingsȱwasȱseenȱtoȱbeȱwhereȱtheȱnamesȱoughtȱtoȱbeȱbestowedȱandȱasȱlongȱasȱtheseȱ appearedȱ beforeȱ theȱ relevantȱ partȱ ofȱ Gould’sȱ monographȱ allȱ wasȱ well.ȱ Quiteȱ often,ȱ however,ȱaȱmonographȱpartȱwasȱoutȱbeforeȱtheȱnameȱappearedȱinȱtheȱProceedings.ȱInȱtheȱ caseȱ ofȱ Gould’sȱ Centuryȱ ofȱ Himalayanȱ Birdsȱ theȱ timingȱ ofȱ publicationȱ ofȱ theȱ individualȱ partsȱhasȱbeenȱcomparedȱwithȱtheȱappearanceȱinȱtheȱProceedingsȱofȱtheȱpapersȱbyȱVigorsȱ whichȱwereȱintendedȱtoȱbeȱtheȱoriginalȱdescriptionsȱ(McAllanȱ&ȱBruce,ȱ2002).ȱForȱmostȱ otherȱmonographsȱbyȱGouldȱwhichȱappearedȱinȱpartsȱnoȱsimilarȱdetailedȱevaluationȱhasȱ appeared.ȱEvenȱsoȱnotesȱwithinȱ“Priority!Ȉȱreferȱtoȱnamesȱmoreȱcorrectlyȱcitedȱfromȱtheȱ ProceedingsȱinȱtheȱcaseȱofȱGould’sȱmonographsȱonȱtheȱtoucansȱ(1833–35)ȱandȱtheȱtrogonsȱ (1835–38).ȱȱ (3) Gould,ȱawareȱofȱtheȱdelaysȱinȱpublicationȱofȱtheȱProceedings,ȱalsoȱallowedȱaȱseparateȱandȱ earlierȱ publicationȱ toȱ occur,ȱ inȱ Jardine’sȱ Contributionsȱ toȱ Ornithologyȱ (Dickinsonȱ etȱ al.,ȱ 2011),ȱofȱtheȱfollowingȱnames:ȱ Tanysipteraȱsylviaȱ Halcyonȱ(Symaȱ?)ȱflavirostrisȱ EdwardȱC.ȱDickinsonȱ&ȱColinȱJonesȱ 78ȱ ZoologicalȱBibliographyȱ2012ȱ2(2&3)ȱ
Drymodesȱsuperciliarisȱȱȱ Carpophagaȱassimilisȱ Chlamyderaȱcerviniventrisȱ Nectariniaȱaustralisȱ Monarchaȱleucotisȱȱ AllȱtheseȱwereȱcrossȬreferencedȱtoȱtheȱforeseenȱreportȱofȱtheȱmeetingȱofȱtheȱZoologicalȱ Societyȱ ofȱ Londonȱ onȱ Mayȱ 14thȱ 1850,ȱ whichȱ wasȱ notȱ publishedȱ untilȱ Jan.ȱ 24,ȱ 1852ȱ (Duncan,ȱ1937).ȱWithȱtheȱexceptionȱofȱtheȱlastȱoneȱtheȱsourcesȱofȱtheseȱnamesȱinȱPetersȱȱ CheckȬlistȱwereȱreferredȱcorrectlyȱtoȱJardine’sȱContributions.ȱ (4) Oneȱ majorȱ workȱ ofȱ theȱ prolificȱ Georgeȱ Shaw,ȱ “Vivariumȱ Naturale:ȱ Theȱ Naturalist’sȱ Miscellany”ȱ(1789–1813),ȱoverlappedȱwithȱhisȱminorȱpartȬworksȱ“Theȱzoologyȱandȱbotanyȱofȱ NewȱHolland”ȱ(1793)ȱandȱ“TheȱzoologyȱofȱNewȱHolland”ȱ(1793–94),ȱcreatingȱpotentialȱforȱ confusionȱoverȱwhichȱofȱhisȱnewȱnamesȱappearedȱfirstȱandȱwhere.ȱDickinsonȱetȱal.ȱ(2011)ȱ statedȱthatȱtheȱnameȱPlatycercusȱeximiusȱhadȱappearedȱnotȱinȱ“TheȱzoologyȱofȱNewȱHolland”ȱ butȱinȱ“TheȱzoologyȱandȱbotanyȱofȱNewȱHolland”;ȱtrue,ȱbutȱtheyȱoverlookedȱtheȱevidenceȱinȱ Schoddeȱ&ȱMasonȱ(1997),ȱcorroboratedȱbyȱDickinsonȱetȱal.ȱ(2006),ȱthatȱthisȱnameȱactuallyȱ firstȱappearedȱinȱtheȱ“VivariumȱNaturale”ȱinȱFebruaryȱ1792.ȱ (5) Ridgwayȱ wasȱ anotherȱ authorȱ whoȱ publishedȱ almostȱ simultaneouslyȱ inȱ twoȱ orȱ moreȱ periodicals.ȱAȱgroupȱofȱhisȱcasesȱhasȱbeenȱexploredȱbyȱBanksȱ&ȱBrowningȱ(1979),ȱwhoȱ identifiedȱ whichȱ ofȱ theȱ variousȱ competingȱ accountsȱ inȱ differentȱ periodicals,ȱ appearedȱ first.ȱ (6) Inȱanotherȱcase,ȱDickinsonȱetȱal.ȱ(2011)ȱinȱTableȱXXIIȱlistedȱvolumeȱ8ȱofȱtheȱAnnuaireȱduȱ Muséeȱ Zoologiqueȱ deȱ l’Académieȱ Impérialeȱ desȱ Sciences,ȱ St.ȱ Pétersbourg,ȱ withȱ theȱ dateȱ ofȱ Marchȱ 1904,ȱ thusȱ suggestingȱ thatȱ twoȱ formsȱ ofȱ theȱ bloodȱ pheasantȱ (Ithaginisȱ cruentusȱ michaelisȱandȱI.ȱc.ȱberezowksii)ȱnamedȱbyȱBianchiȱwhichȱappearedȱinȱthereȱshouldȱnotȱbeȱ datedȱfromȱ1903.ȱTrue,ȱhowever,ȱtheseȱtwoȱbirdsȱwereȱalsoȱdescribedȱbyȱBianchiȱinȱtheȱ Januaryȱ1904ȱissueȱofȱtheȱJournalȱfürȱOrnithologieȱ–ȱanȱissueȱnotȱyetȱknownȱtoȱhaveȱbeenȱ delayedȱandȱthus,ȱwithȱdateȱofȱ31ȱJanuary,ȱtheȱsourceȱtoȱcite.ȱAndȱtheȱmoreȱsoȱbecauseȱ theȱ Marchȱ 1904ȱ dateȱ wasȱ aȱ dateȱ inȱ theȱJulianȱ calendarȱ andȱ wouldȱ haveȱ beenȱ someȱ 10ȱ daysȱintoȱAprilȱinȱtheȱGregorianȱcalendar.ȱ (7) Datingȱerrorsȱmayȱalsoȱderiveȱfromȱlimitedȱknowledgeȱofȱpreprints.ȱȱForȱexample,ȱtheȱ nameȱ Oriolusȱ szalayiȱ seems,ȱ fromȱ anȱ examinationȱ ofȱ theȱ Hungarianȱ journalȱ andȱ theȱ subordinateȱpartsȱinȱwhichȱitȱwasȱpublished,ȱtoȱrequireȱcorrectionȱfromȱ1900ȱ–ȱtheȱdateȱ citedȱbyȱGreenwayȱ(1962)ȱinȱPeters’ȱCheckȬlistȱ–ȱtoȱ1901.ȱIndeed,ȱDickinsonȱetȱal.ȱ(2011:ȱ 178)ȱsuggestedȱthatȱtheȱresultsȱofȱresearchȱcarefullyȱdoneȱforȱTheȱHandbookȱofȱBirdsȱofȱtheȱ Worldȱnecessitatedȱthatȱcorrection,ȱandȱendorsedȱitȱbyȱincludingȱaȱtableȱofȱtheȱdatesȱofȱ publicationȱofȱtheȱvolumesȱandȱpartsȱofȱtheȱrelevantȱjournalȱdevelopedȱthroughȱfurtherȱ researchȱbyȱtwoȱacknowledgedȱcolleagues.ȱYetȱbothȱtheȱauthorȱofȱtheȱresearchȱforȱtheȱ handbook,ȱandȱDickinsonȱetȱal.ȱ(2011)ȱ–ȱandȱtheȱtwoȱhelpfulȱcolleaguesȱ–ȱoverlookedȱtheȱ notation,ȱinȱaȱcardȱinȱtheȱRichmondȱIndex,ȱtoȱtheȱeffectȱthatȱaȱpreprintȱexistedȱcarryingȱ theȱ dateȱ Novemberȱ 1,ȱ 1900.ȱ Ofȱ course,ȱ theȱ Richmondȱ Indexȱ wasȱ alwaysȱ aȱ workȱ inȱ progress,ȱratherȱthanȱaȱfinishedȱwork,ȱandȱitȱcanȱbeȱdangerousȱtoȱacceptȱassertionsȱlikeȱ thisȱ unlessȱ theyȱ canȱ beȱ corroborated.ȱ Butȱ depictionȱ ofȱ suchȱ evidenceȱ wasȱ beyondȱ theȱ scopeȱofȱtheȱindexȱcardsȱwhichȱwereȱnotȱintendedȱforȱpublication.ȱNowȱpublished,ȱandȱ citableȱ asȱ “Richmond,ȱ 1992”,ȱ suchȱ reportedȱ evidence,ȱ notȱ beingȱ illustratedȱ andȱ madeȱ explicit,ȱshouldȱbeȱnewlyȱresearched.ȱRichmond,ȱandȱthoseȱwhoȱaddedȱtoȱhisȱcardȱindexȱ EdwardȱC.ȱDickinsonȱ&ȱColinȱJonesȱ 79ȱ ZoologicalȱBibliographyȱ2012ȱ2(2&3)ȱ
later,ȱworkedȱinȱtheȱDivisionȱofȱBirdsȱatȱtheȱUnitedȱStatesȱNationalȱMuseum,ȱandȱthusȱaȱ logicalȱ pointȱ ofȱ departureȱ isȱ toȱ findȱ outȱ whetherȱ theȱ preprintȱ concernedȱ hasȱ beenȱ preservedȱ inȱ thatȱ organisation’sȱ “reprintȱ collection”.ȱ Itȱ isȱ thoughtȱ thatȱ theȱ aboveȬ mentionedȱreprintȱcollectionȱsurvives,ȱas,ȱforȱtheȱtimeȱbeing,ȱdoesȱtheȱreprintȱcollectionȱ inȱTring.ȱHowever,ȱinȱrecentȱyearsȱsuchȱreprintȱcollectionsȱhaveȱbeenȱseenȱasȱredundantȱ andȱtheyȱareȱthreatened.ȱȱTheyȱalsoȱgetȱ‘pruned’ȱofȱtheirȱ‘duplicates’ȱandȱitȱnowȱbecomesȱ apparentȱ thatȱ suchȱ pruningȱ couldȱ leadȱ toȱ aȱ preprintȱ beingȱ discardedȱ dueȱ toȱ misconceptionsȱaboutȱitsȱimportance.ȱ Happilyȱinȱthisȱcaseȱtheȱreprintȱcollectionȱinȱ theȱ Rothschildȱ Libraryȱ inȱ theȱ Naturalȱ Historyȱ Museumȱ inȱ Tringȱ holdsȱ anȱ exampleȱ ofȱ thisȱ preprint.ȱȱ Evidenceȱ ofȱ thisȱ kindȱ mustȱ beȱ retained.ȱ Majorȱ institutionalȱ librariesȱ needȱ toȱ decideȱ whetherȱaȱspecialȱcollectionȱofȱdigitisedȱexamplesȱofȱsuchȱmaterialȱshouldȱbeȱcreatedȱandȱ protected.ȱȱUntilȱsuchȱpolicyȱissuesȱhaveȱbeenȱproperlyȱconsideredȱatȱaȱglobalȱlevel,ȱe.g.ȱ byȱ theȱ Internationalȱ Commissionȱ forȱ Zoologicalȱ Nomenclature,ȱ andȱ subsequentlyȱ agreed,ȱ librariansȱ shouldȱ maintainȱ theirȱ ‘reprintȱ collections’ȱ andȱ seekȱ toȱ identifyȱ preprintsȱbecauseȱtheseȱareȱofȱspecialȱimportance.ȱ
PUBLICATIONȱBYȱANOTHERȱAUTHORȱ Anȱauthorȱmayȱalsoȱloseȱprecedence,ȱorȱapparentlyȱdoȱso,ȱdueȱtoȱdelayedȱpublicationȱofȱ hisȱ ownȱ manuscriptȱ andȱ fasterȱ publicationȱ byȱ aȱ fellowȱ scientistȱ whoȱ wasȱ takenȱ intoȱ hisȱ confidence.ȱ (1) Lawrenceȱ(‘1860’ȱ=ȱ1861)ȱdescribedȱaȱnewȱhummingbirdȱwithȱtheȱnameȱBasilinnaȱxantusiiȱ inȱtheȱAnnalsȱofȱtheȱLyceumȱofȱNaturalȱHistoryȱinȱNewȱYork.ȱEitherȱbeforeȱsubmittingȱthis,ȱ orȱ whileȱ awaitingȱ itsȱ publication,ȱ Lawrenceȱ sentȱ aȱ specimenȱ toȱ Gouldȱ toȱ examine.ȱ Gould,ȱrespectingȱandȱusingȱLawrence’sȱnameȱforȱthis,ȱdepictedȱtheȱnoveltyȱinȱpartȱ21ȱofȱ hisȱ Monographȱ ofȱ theȱ Hummingbirdsȱ orȱ Familyȱ Trochilidaeȱ whichȱ isȱ saidȱ toȱ haveȱ beenȱ publishedȱonȱMayȱ1,ȱ1861ȱ(Sauer,ȱ1982).ȱThisȱcouldȱhaveȱbeenȱbeforeȱLawrence’sȱarticleȱ butȱ inȱ factȱ forȱ thisȱ issueȱ ofȱ theȱ Annalsȱ weȱ haveȱ aȱ receiptȱ dateȱ atȱ theȱ Smithsonianȱ InstitutionȱofȱAprilȱ21,ȱ1861.ȱ (2) GouldȱwhenȱpublishingȱhisȱAȱcenturyȱofȱbirdsȱfromȱtheȱHimalayanȱmountainsȱreliedȱuponȱ Vigorsȱ forȱ theȱ formalȱ descriptionsȱ inȱ theȱ Proceedingsȱ ofȱ theȱ Zoologicalȱ Societyȱ ofȱ London.ȱ AfterȱthisȱGouldȱprovidedȱhisȱownȱtextsȱandȱpublishedȱhisȱownȱnovelties.ȱHowever,ȱheȱ stillȱoccasionallyȱdrewȱonȱtheȱworkȱofȱothers.ȱDickinsonȱ(2004)ȱhasȱnotedȱthatȱsomeȱnewȱ birdsȱwereȱdescribedȱbyȱMooreȱforȱtheȱProceedingsȱandȱbyȱGouldȱforȱhisȱTheȱBirdsȱofȱAsiaȱ (1849Ȭ83).ȱTheȱriddlesȱposedȱbyȱthreeȱMooreȱnamesȱinȱtheȱgenusȱAegithalosȱoverȱwhichȱ accountȱ appearedȱ firstȱ wasȱ notȱ correctlyȱ resolvedȱ inȱ 2004ȱ andȱ requiredȱ correctiveȱ footnotesȱtoȱDickinsonȱetȱal.ȱ(2006).ȱȱ (3) InȱtheȱcaseȱofȱtwoȱparrotsȱSalvadoriȱandȱP.ȱL.ȱSclaterȱȱfoundȱthemselvesȱinȱcompetition.ȱ AlthoughȱitȱisȱlikelyȱthatȱtheyȱbothȱintendedȱSalvadoriȱinȱtheȱAnnaliȱdelȱMuseoȱCivicoȱdiȱ Storiaȱ Naturaleȱ diȱ Genovaȱ toȱ beȱ theȱ originalȱ author,ȱ creditȱ hasȱ beenȱ widelyȱ givenȱ toȱ Sclater’sȱ publicationȱ inȱ Theȱ Proceedingsȱ ofȱ theȱ Zoologicalȱ Societyȱ ofȱ London.ȱ Thisȱ caseȱ isȱ carefullyȱexplainedȱonȱpageȱ174ȱofȱPriority!ȱexceptȱthatȱwhereȱP.L.ȱSclaterȱshouldȱhaveȱ beenȱmentionedȱtheȱnameȱSalvinȱwasȱused!ȱȱ (4) Asȱreadersȱwillȱknowȱnewȱnamesȱcanȱalsoȱappearȱtwiceȱcoincidentallyȱbasedȱonȱdifferentȱ typeȱmaterial.ȱInȱPriority!ȱonȱpageȱ7,ȱmentionȱisȱmadeȱofȱaȱminivetȱ–ȱnamedȱPericrocotusȱ EdwardȱC.ȱDickinsonȱ&ȱColinȱJonesȱ 80ȱ ZoologicalȱBibliographyȱ2012ȱ2(2&3)ȱ
speciosusȱfohkiensisȱbyȱButurlinȱ(1910)ȱandȱagainȱbyȱBakerȱ(1920).ȱTheȱtwoȱnamesȱalmostȱ certainlyȱ attachȱ toȱ theȱ sameȱ taxonȱ (theȱ twoȱ typeȱ localitiesȱ areȱ givenȱ asȱ Ashongȱ forȱ Buturlin’sȱname,ȱandȱYamakanȱforȱBaker’sȱ(seeȱDeignan,ȱ1964)).ȱBaker’sȱnameȱisȱaȱjuniorȱ objectiveȱhomonymȱandȱsynonymȱand,ȱwhileȱpreoccupied,ȱwasȱvalidlyȱintroduced.ȱȱ
ERRORSȱANDȱOMISSIONSȱ Lesson’sȱCenturieȱZoologiqueȱwasȱnotȱwellȱservedȱbyȱprovidingȱaȱtableȱdatingȱtheȱplatesȱ withoutȱaddingȱtheȱpaginationȱandȱthusȱtheȱdatesȱofȱtheȱnamesȱaccordingȱtoȱwhetherȱtheȱtextȱ appearedȱ firstȱ orȱ theȱ plates.ȱ Thisȱ ledȱ toȱ errorsȱ inȱ Tableȱ 66ȱ inȱ respectȱ ofȱ Aquilaȱ verreauxii,ȱ Attagis,ȱAttagisȱgayi,ȱThinocorusȱorbygnianus,ȱTangaraȱfastuosaȱandȱSpindalisȱzenaȱpretreiȱwhichȱ allȱdateȱfromȱtextȱinȱ1831ȱandȱnotȱplatesȱinȱ1832.ȱAȱrelatedȱproblemȱcreptȱintoȱtheȱsameȱtable,ȱ thisȱwasȱforȱTangaraȱarthusȱwhereȱtheȱdateȱinformationȱwasȱcorrect,ȱbutȱtheȱindicationȱofȱpageȱ 118ȱinȱPriority!ȱwasȱnotȱ–ȱitȱshouldȱhaveȱreadȱpageȱ121.ȱ(Forȱmoreȱhelpfulȱinformationȱseeȱ Tableȱ1).ȱ InȱdiscussingȱSchomburgk’sȱReisenȱinȱBritischȬGuianaȱinȱdenȱJahrenȱ1840Ȭ1844ȱitȱwasȱnotedȱ thatȱ“oneȱnewȱbird,ȱnamedȱtoȱhonourȱSchomburgk,ȱisȱdescribedȱinȱtheilȱ2ȱinȱtextȱbyȱCabanis”.ȱ ThisȱwasȱwrongȱthereȱisȱinsufficientȱevidenceȱthatȱtheȱdescriptionȱofȱCrexȱschomburgkiiȱwasȱ writtenȱ byȱ Cabanisȱ (thereȱ beingȱ forȱ exampleȱ noȱ useȱ ofȱ quotationȱ marks);ȱ theȱ mentionȱ ofȱ “Cab.”ȱmustȱbeȱtakenȱtoȱreferȱtoȱhisȱsupplyȱofȱaȱMSȱname.ȱȱȱ Anȱ elementaryȱ mistakeȱ wasȱ madeȱ asȱ regardsȱ theȱ Annuaireȱ duȱ Muséeȱ Zoologiqueȱ deȱ l’AcadémieȱImpérialeȱdesȱSciences,ȱSt.ȱPétersbourg.ȱOnȱp.ȱ177ȱinȱPriority!ȱitȱisȱsaidȱthatȱtheȱfirstȱ12ȱ volumesȱwereȱ“singleȱissueȱvolumes”.ȱTableȱXXIIȱshowsȱthisȱnotȱtoȱbeȱtheȱcaseȱforȱvol.ȱ12.ȱ However,ȱmoreȱimportantly,ȱthisȱisȱnotȱaȱsafeȱstatementȱregardingȱtheȱearlierȱvolumes.ȱThoseȱ volumesȱinspectedȱcontainedȱnoȱoriginalȱwrappersȱandȱgaveȱnoȱbreakdownȱofȱtheȱparts,ȱandȱ aȱ dangerousȱ assumptionȱ wasȱ made.ȱ Furtherȱ evidenceȱ isȱ neededȱ onȱ allȱ ofȱ theȱ firstȱ elevenȱ volumes.ȱ QuiteȱaȱfewȱaccountsȱofȱworksȱcoveredȱinȱPriority!ȱreportedȱtheȱevidenceȱforȱandȱagainstȱ aȱchangeȱinȱdateȱknowingȱthatȱdetailedȱresearchȱinȱrelationȱtoȱnamesȱwithinȱtheȱworksȱhadȱ yetȱ toȱ beȱ undertaken.ȱ Thus,ȱ inȱ theȱ caseȱ ofȱ partȱ works,ȱ partsȱ mightȱ beȱ dated,ȱ butȱ whetherȱ partsȱthatȱrequiredȱchangedȱdatesȱheldȱnewȱnamesȱtoȱwhichȱtheseȱsameȱdateȱchangesȱmustȱ beȱappliedȱwasȱnotȱalwaysȱapparent.ȱInȱsomeȱcasesȱitȱwasȱstatedȱthatȱsuchȱworkȱremainedȱtoȱ beȱdone,ȱbutȱinȱotherȱcasesȱthisȱwasȱmerelyȱinferred.ȱȱ Yetȱ inȱ someȱ ofȱ theseȱ casesȱ theȱ nextȱ stepȱ inȱ theȱ researchȱ wasȱ obvious.ȱ Anyoneȱ withȱ aȱ databaseȱlistingȱtheȱnamesȱpublishedȱwithinȱaȱgivenȱpartȱofȱaȱpartȱworkȱwasȱenabledȱtoȱmakeȱ suchȱ correctionsȱ asȱ seemedȱ toȱ beȱ necessary.ȱ Colinȱ Jonesȱ wasȱ thereforeȱ ableȱ toȱ offerȱ theȱ followingȱcorrections:ȱ
Micrasturȱbuckleyiȱ(tableȱLXVI,ȱlineȱ79)ȱ Theȱcorrectȱdateȱisȱ1919ȱseeȱtextȱpageȱ151.ȱ
Chelictiniaȱriocouriiȱ(tableȱLXVI,ȱlineȱ93)ȱ TheȱnotesȱtoȱthisȱtableȱindicateȱthatȱthisȱisȱinȱLivraisonȱ11ȱofȱTemminckȱ&ȱLaugier’sȱ Planchesȱ Coloriées.ȱ Thisȱ isȱ notȱ correct;ȱ itȱ isȱ inȱ factȱ inȱ Livraisonȱ 15.ȱ Theȱ relevantȱ wrapperȱ showingȱ theȱ correctȱ originalȱ spellingȱ hasȱ beenȱ depictedȱ inȱ Dickinsonȱ (2012).ȱ EdwardȱC.ȱDickinsonȱ&ȱColinȱJonesȱ 81ȱ ZoologicalȱBibliographyȱ2012ȱ2(2&3)ȱ
Tableȱ1.ȱComprehensiveȱdatesȱforȱbirdȱnamesȱinȱLesson’sȱCenturieȱzoologique.ȱ
Plateȱ Textȱ Signedȱ Sherbornȇsȱ Yearȱ Subjectȱnameȱinȱplateȱlistȱ Livr.ȱ Yearȱ No.ȱ pageȱ dateȱ datesȱ 3ȱ EpimachusȱregiusȱLessonȱ 1ȱorȱ2ȱ 1830ȱ 18–21ȱ Aprilȱ1829ȱ Nov.ȱ1830ȱ
ȱ 4ȱ&ȱ5ȱȱ EpimachusȱmagnificusȱCuvierȱ 1ȱorȱ2ȱ 1830ȱ 22–29ȱ Oct.ȱ1829ȱ Nov.ȱ1830ȱ 6ȱ TijucaȱnigraȱLessonȱ 2ȱ 1830ȱ 30–32ȱ Nov.ȱ1829ȱ Nov.ȱ1830ȱ 1830 7ȱ CacicusȱMontezumaȱLessonȱ 2ȱ 1830ȱ 33–35ȱ Nov.ȱ1829ȱ Nov.ȱ1830ȱ 8ȱ AlcedoȱatricapillaȱL.ȱ 2ȱ 1830ȱ 36–37ȱ n.d.ȱ Nov.ȱ1830ȱ 11ȱ CrotophagaȱCasasiiȱLessonȱ 3ȱ 1831ȱ 41ȱ n.d.ȱ Nov.ȱ1830ȱ 14ȱ PicusȱbadioidesȱLessonȱ 3ȱ 1831ȱ 56–57ȱ Jan.ȱ1830ȱ Mar.ȱ1831ȱ 16ȱ XenopsȱCanivetiiȱLessonȱ 4ȱ 1831ȱ 60ȱ Dec.ȱ1829ȱ Mar.ȱ1831ȱ 18ȱ Psittacusȱ(Lathamus)ȱaurifronsȱLessonȱ 4ȱ 1831ȱ 63–64ȱ Jan.ȱ1830ȱ Mar.ȱ1831ȱ 19ȱ TamnophilusȱOthelloȱLessonȱ 4ȱ 1831ȱ 65–66ȱ Marchȱ1830ȱ Mar.ȱ1831ȱ 22ȱ IcterusȱatrogularisȱLessonȱ 5ȱ 1831ȱ 73–74ȱ Nov.ȱ1829ȱ Mar.ȱ1831ȱ ȱ 24ȱ Tanagraȱ(Ramphocelus)ȱignescensȱLessonȱ 5ȱ 1831ȱ 77–78ȱ Marchȱ1830ȱ Mar.ȱ1831ȱ
1831 26ȱ PardalotusȱpipraȱLessonȱ 6ȱ 1831ȱ 81–82ȱ Aprilȱ1830ȱ Mar.ȱ1831ȱ 27ȱ DicæumȱnigerȱLessonȱ 6ȱ 1831ȱ 83ȱ Juneȱ1828ȱ Mar.ȱ1831ȱ 30ȱ MerulaxisȱaterȱLessonȱ 6ȱ 1831ȱ 88–89ȱ Juneȱ1830ȱ Mar.ȱ1831ȱ 32ȱ PicolaptesȱguttataȱLessonȱ 7ȱ 1831ȱ 93–94ȱ Aprilȱ1830ȱ Mar.ȱ1831ȱ 36ȱ XenopsȱruficollarisȱLessonȱ 8ȱ 1831ȱ 101–102 Juneȱ1830ȱ Mar.ȱ1831ȱ 38ȱ AquilaȱVereauxiiȱLessonȱ 8ȱ 1831ȱ 105–106 Juneȱ1830ȱ Mar.ȱ1831ȱ 39ȱ Tangaraȱ(Tachyphonus)ȱsanguinolentusȱLesson 8ȱ 1831ȱ 107–108 28ȱJul.ȱ1830ȱ Mar.ȱ1831ȱ 41ȱ IcterusȱmentalisȱLessonȱ 9ȱ 1832ȱ 111–112 Aug.ȱ1830ȱ Mar.ȱ1831ȱ 45ȱ TangaraȱPretreiȱLessonȱ 9ȱ 1832ȱ 122–123 n.d.ȱ Mar.ȱ1831ȱ 47ȱ AttagisȱGayiiȱIsid.ȱ+ȱLessonȱ 10ȱ 1832ȱ 127–136 n.d.ȱ Mar.ȱ1831ȱ 48ȱ Tinochorusȱorbignyanusȱ[inȱpl.]ȱIsid.ȱ+ȱLessonȱ 10ȱ 1832ȱ 137–138 n.d.ȱ Mar.ȱ1831ȱ 49ȱ Tinochorusȱorbignyanusȱ[inȱpl.]ȱIsid.ȱ+ȱLessonȱ 10ȱ 1832ȱ 139ȱ n.d.ȱ Mar.ȱ1831ȱ 50ȱ TinochorusȱEscholtziiȱ[inȱpl.]ȱIsid.ȱ+ȱLessonȱ 10ȱ 1832ȱ 140–141 Oct.ȱ1830ȱ Mar.ȱ1831ȱ 54ȱ AmblyramphusȱPrevostiiȱLess.ȱȱ 11ȱ 1832ȱ 159–160 Oct.ȱ1830ȱ Mar.ȱ1831ȱ 58ȱ TangaraȱfastuosaȱLessonȱ 12ȱ 1832ȱ 184–185 Nov.ȱ1830ȱ Mar.ȱ1831ȱ 59ȱ PsarisȱhabiaȱLessonȱ 12ȱ 1832ȱ 186–187 Oct.ȱ1830ȱ Mar.ȱ1831ȱ 60ȱ OrtyxȱcalifornicusȱLessonȱ 12ȱ 1832ȱ 188ȱ Juneȱ1830ȱ Mar.ȱ1831ȱ
ȱ 61ȱ OrtyxȱelegansȱLessonȱ 13ȱ 1832ȱ 189ȱ Juneȱ1830ȱ Mar.ȱ1831ȱ
1832 65ȱ VangaȱcruentaȱLessonȱ 13ȱ 1832ȱ 198–199 Dec.ȱ1830ȱ Mayȱ1832ȱ 66ȱ MegalonyxȱrufusȱLessonȱ 14ȱ 1832ȱ 200–203 Jan.ȱ1831ȱ Mayȱ1832ȱ 67ȱ PitylusȱchrysogasterȱLessonȱ 14ȱ 1832ȱ 204–205 Jan.ȱ1831ȱ Mayȱ1832ȱ 68ȱ Tangaraȱ(Aglaia)ȱvicariusȱLessonȱ 14ȱ 1832ȱ 206–207 Jan.ȱ1831ȱ Mayȱ1832ȱ 69ȱ Tangaraȱ(Saltator)ȱatricepsȱLessonȱ 14ȱ 1832ȱ 208–209 Jan.ȱ1831ȱ Mayȱ1832ȱ 70ȱ PicolaptesȱzonatusȱLessonȱ 14ȱ 1832ȱ 210–211 Jan.ȱ1831ȱ Mayȱ1832ȱ 71ȱ EdelaȱruficepsȱLessonȱ 15ȱ 1832ȱ 212ȱ n.d.ȱ Mayȱ1832ȱ 72ȱ LaniusȱbentetȱHorsf.ȱ 15ȱ 1832ȱ 213–214 n.d.ȱ Mayȱ1832ȱ 73ȱ PicusȱcanenteȱLessonȱ 15ȱ 1832ȱ 215–216 n.d.ȱ Mayȱ1832ȱ 74ȱ EurycerosȱPrevostiiȱLessonȱ 15ȱ 1832ȱ 217–218 Marchȱ1831ȱ Mayȱ1832ȱ 75ȱ LaniusȱbimaculatusȱLessonȱ 15ȱ 1832ȱ 219–220 n.d.ȱ Mayȱ1832ȱ
Note:ȱBoldȱtypeȱforȱLivraisonȱnos.ȱjustȱsignalȱoddȱnumberedȱparts.ȱBoldȱdatesȱinȱtheȱrightȱ handȱcolumnȱsignalȱtheȱdateȱtoȱuseȱforȱtextȱwhichȱapparentlyȱprecededȱtheȱrelevantȱplate.ȱ EdwardȱC.ȱDickinsonȱ&ȱColinȱJonesȱ 82ȱ ZoologicalȱBibliographyȱ2012ȱ2(2&3)ȱ
Aquilaȱ[pomarina]ȱhastataȱ(tableȱLXVI,ȱlineȱ129)ȱ Theȱcorrectȱdateȱofȱpublicationȱisȱ1831,ȱasȱthisȱwasȱinȱtheȱfirstȱofȱtheȱtwoȱpartsȱonȱ birdsȱinȱBélanger’sȱbook.ȱThereȱwasȱprolongedȱconfusionȱoverȱtheȱdateȱtoȱuseȱforȱtheȱ secondȱpart,ȱandȱthisȱledȱtoȱaȱmistakenȱuseȱofȱ1832ȱinȱtheȱtable.ȱ
Centropusȱsuperciliosusȱ(tableȱLXVI,ȱlineȱ274)ȱ
Theȱuseȱofȱ1827ȱisȱanȱerror;ȱtheȱcorrectionȱisȱfromȱ1833ȱtoȱ1828.ȱ
Selenideraȱnattereriȱ(tableȱLXVI,ȱlineȱ433)ȱ Thisȱmistakenlyȱshowedȱ1836ȱasȱtheȱdateȱtoȱbeȱusedȱinȱtheȱfutureȱandȱimpliedȱthatȱ theȱdateȱhadȱbeenȱrightlyȱcorrectedȱtoȱ1836ȱinȱDickinsonȱ(2003).ȱInȱsoȱfarȱasȱtheȱdateȱ ofȱappearanceȱinȱtheȱProceedingsȱofȱtheȱZoologicalȱSocietyȱofȱLondonȱisȱconcerned,ȱ theȱchangeȱtoȱ1836ȱwasȱcorrect.ȱHowever,ȱtheȱtableȱshouldȱhaveȱshownȱ1835ȱasȱtheȱ correctȱdateȱforȱfutureȱuseȱasȱtheȱcitationȱswitchesȱtoȱpartȱ3ȱofȱtheȱMonographȱ(seeȱ Priority!ȱp.ȱ96).ȱ
Phyllomyiasȱburmeisteriȱzeledoniȱ(tableȱLXVI,ȱlineȱ508)ȱ Thereȱshouldȱhaveȱbeenȱnoȱsuchȱline.ȱTheȱdateȱ1869ȱisȱcorrect.ȱ
Tyrannusȱsavanaȱsavannaȱ(tableȱLXVI,ȱlineȱ543)ȱ Noȱcorrectedȱdateȱofȱpublicationȱwasȱgivenȱbecause,ȱalthoughȱtheȱdatesȱinȱuseȱforȱ namesȱ inȱ thisȱ workȱ canȱ nowȱ beȱ seenȱ toȱ haveȱ beenȱ incorrectlyȱ derived,ȱ noȱ freshȱ evidenceȱhasȱbeenȱunearthed.ȱThereȱareȱthusȱtwoȱchoicesȱavailable:ȱtoȱrecalibrateȱtheȱ datesȱusingȱtheȱmoreȱaccurateȱstartȱdateȱofȱthisȱpartȱworkȱ(seeȱDickinson,ȱ2011)ȱbutȱ otherwiseȱrelyingȱonȱtheȱlogicȱofȱBrowningȱ&ȱMonroeȱ(1991)ȱofȱregularȱissues,ȱorȱtoȱ retainȱtheȱdatesȱnowȱinȱuseȱdespiteȱknowingȱthemȱtoȱneedȱcorrection.ȱUntilȱaȱsetȱofȱ thisȱ partȱ workȱ revealsȱ theȱ contentȱ perȱ partȱ –ȱ andȱ Browningȱ orȱ Monroeȱ wouldȱ appearȱtoȱhaveȱfoundȱsuchȱaȱsetȱbutȱRalphȱBrowningȱ(pers.ȱcomm.)ȱdoesȱnotȱrecallȱ whereȱthatȱmightȱbeȱheldȱ–ȱtheȱchoiceȱisȱnotȱsimple.ȱMoreover,ȱtheȱdataȱgivenȱbyȱ Browningȱ &ȱ Monroeȱ wasȱ notȱ internallyȱ consistent.ȱ Meanwhile,ȱ R.ȱ Massmannȱ hasȱ discoveredȱ thatȱ theȱ nameȱ Tyrannusȱ savannaȱ wasȱ introducedȱ byȱ Daudinȱ (1802)ȱ supportedȱ byȱ appropriateȱ indications.ȱ Thisȱ isȱ unpublishedȱ informationȱ butȱ itȱ hasȱ beenȱmadeȱavailableȱbyȱwww.zoonomen.net.ȱ
Xiphorhynchusȱpromeropirhynchusȱcostaricensisȱ(tableȱLXVI,ȱlineȱ620)ȱ Thereȱshouldȱhaveȱbeenȱnoȱsuchȱline.ȱTheȱdateȱisȱcorrectȱatȱ1889.ȱ
Oriolusȱszalayiȱ(tableȱLXVI,ȱlineȱ780)ȱ Theȱdateȱcorrectionȱhereȱshouldȱbeȱignoredȱasȱnoȱaccountȱwasȱtakenȱofȱtheȱpreprintȱ (discussedȱabove).ȱ EdwardȱC.ȱDickinsonȱ&ȱColinȱJonesȱ 83ȱ ZoologicalȱBibliographyȱ2012ȱ2(2&3)ȱ
ADDITIONSȱTOȱTABLEȱLXVI:ȱ 1) Lampornisȱclemenciaeȱclemenciaeȱ(seeȱDickinson,ȱ2003:ȱ268)ȱchangesȱfromȱ1829ȱtoȱ1830ȱ(seeȱ tableȱLXVI,ȱlineȱ365);ȱtheȱtaxonȱcalledȱAmaziliaȱcyanocephalaȱcyanocephalaȱ(Dickinsonȱ2003:ȱ 266)ȱwasȱpublishedȱonȱtheȱsameȱpageȱandȱneedsȱtheȱsameȱdateȱchange.ȱ 2) Theȱ dateȱ applicableȱ toȱ allȱ orȱ partȱ ofȱ volumeȱ 1ȱ ofȱ Museumȱ Heineanumȱ byȱ Cabanisȱ hasȱ puzzledȱnumerousȱ contributorsȱtoȱ Peters’sȱCheckȬlistȱandȱthatȱconfusionȱledȱDickinsonȱ (2003)ȱfollowingȱthemȱtoȱuseȱanȱillogicalȱmixȱofȱ1850ȱandȱ1851ȱ(andȱevenȱonce,ȱinȱerror,ȱ 1852).ȱRoomȱforȱconfusionȱbeginsȱwithȱtheȱindicationȱ“1850–1851”ȱonȱtheȱtitleȱpageȱandȱ wasȱ discussedȱ byȱ Quaisserȱ &ȱ Dickinsonȱ (2011)ȱ andȱ theyȱ concludedȱ thatȱ allȱ theȱ text,ȱ exceptȱperhapsȱpp.ȱ1–24ȱorȱ1–32,ȱshouldȱbeȱdatedȱ1851.ȱTheȱForeword,ȱwhichȱfollowingȱ usualȱ practiceȱ wouldȱ beȱ preparedȱ afterȱ theȱ text,ȱ isȱ datedȱ Octoberȱ 1851.ȱ Moreȱ recentlyȱ Mlíkovskýȱ(2012)ȱhasȱarguedȱpersuasivelyȱthatȱpublicationȱwasȱactuallyȱdeferredȱuntilȱ 1853ȱ–ȱdespiteȱtheȱdateȱofȱ1851ȱonȱtheȱtitleȱpageȱ(althoughȱhisȱcaseȱagainstȱtheȱexistenceȱ ofȱ“AdvanceȱSheets”ȱisȱweaker).ȱȱMlíkovskýȱrecommendedȱthatȱnoȱchangesȱinȱdatesȱbeȱ madeȱpendingȱfurtherȱresearchȱtoȱdetermineȱwhetherȱanyȱnamesȱfallȱintoȱtheȱsynonymyȱ ofȱotherȱnamesȱpublishedȱbeforeȱ1853.ȱȱ Tableȱ2ȱsummarisesȱallȱtaxonȱnamesȱusedȱbyȱDickinsonȱ(2003)ȱthatȱareȱderivedȱfromȱthisȱ volume.ȱInȱaȱfewȱcasesȱcorrectedȱinformationȱisȱinȱTableȱLXVI,ȱbutȱinȱmostȱcasesȱitȱisȱnot.ȱ 3) Gray,ȱG.R.ȱ(1844–49).ȱTheȱgeneraȱofȱbirdsȱ...ȱ(seeȱPriority!ȱp.ȱ103)ȱȱ TableȱIVȱprividesȱaȱdirectȱlinkȱisȱmadeȱbetweenȱtheȱcontentȱandȱtheȱdatesȱofȱpublication.ȱȱ ThisȱrevealsȱthatȱPsarocoliusȱwagleriȱdatesȱfromȱ1844ȱnotȱ1845,ȱandȱthatȱtheȱgenericȱnameȱ Phegornisȱshouldȱbeȱdatedȱ1847,ȱnotȱ1846ȱasȱgivenȱbyȱPetersȱ(1934:ȱ258).ȱFurtherȱreviewȱ mayȱyieldȱotherȱcorrections.ȱ Mentionȱ wasȱ madeȱ inȱ Priority!ȱ ofȱ theȱ cancellationȱ andȱ reissueȱ ofȱ certainȱ partsȱ ofȱ thisȱ work.ȱ Examplesȱ ofȱ thoseȱ originalȱ partsȱ haveȱ nowȱ beenȱ located,ȱ andȱ aȱ comparisonȱ isȱ beingȱmadeȱbetweenȱthemȱandȱtheȱpagesȱthatȱsucceededȱthem.ȱAȱseparateȱreportȱonȱthisȱ willȱbeȱforthcomingȱinȱdueȱcourse.ȱ
Tableȱ2.ȱMuseumȱHeineanum,ȱVol.ȱ1ȱ“1850–1851”:ȱprovisionalȱdatesȱpendingȱpotentialȱacceptanceȱofȱ 1853ȱ(Mlíkovský,ȱ2012).ȱ
Dateȱusedȱ Dateȱnowȱȱ Pageȱinȱ Pageȱ Nameȱofȱtaxonȱ inȱ2003ȱ recommendedȱ Mus.ȱHein.ȱ 426ȱ AILUROEDUSȱ 1851ȱ 1851ȱ 213ȱ 431ȱ LICHENOSTOMUSȱ 1851ȱ 1851ȱ 119ȱ 432ȱ Lichenostomusȱcratitiusȱoccidentalisȱ 1851ȱ 1851ȱ 119ȱ 439ȱ LICHMERAȱ 1851ȱ 1851ȱ 118ȱ 450ȱ POMATOSTOMUSȱ 1851ȱ 1851ȱ 83ȱ 452ȱ HETERALOCHAȱ 1851ȱ 1851ȱ 218ȱ 457ȱ CHLOROPHONEUSȱ 1850ȱ 1851ȱ 70ȱ 478ȱ UROLESTESȱ 1850ȱ 1851ȱ 75ȱ 492ȱ Dicrurusȱhottentottusȱbrevirostrisȱ 1851ȱ 1851ȱ 112ȱ 493ȱ Dicrurusȱparadiseusȱformosusȱ 1851ȱ 1851ȱ 111ȱ 495ȱ Rhipiduraȱalbiscapaȱpreissiȱ 1850ȱ 1851ȱ 57ȱ 498ȱ TROCHOCERCUSȱ 1850ȱ 1851ȱ 58ȱ 505ȱ CYANOLYCAȱ 1851ȱ 1851ȱ 223ȱ EdwardȱC.ȱDickinsonȱ&ȱColinȱJonesȱ 84ȱ ZoologicalȱBibliographyȱ2012ȱ2(2&3)ȱ
Dateȱusedȱ Dateȱnowȱȱ Pageȱinȱ Pageȱ Nameȱofȱtaxonȱ inȱ2003ȱ recommendedȱ Mus.ȱHein.ȱ 507ȱ APHELOCOMAȱ 1851ȱ 1851ȱ 221ȱ 509ȱ UROCISSAȱ 1850ȱ 1851ȱ 87ȱ 510ȱ Cissaȱchinensisȱminorȱ 1850ȱ 1851ȱ 86ȱ 530ȱ ANTHOSCOPUSȱ 1850ȱ 1851ȱ 89ȱ 531ȱ PSALIDOPROCNEȱ 1850ȱ 1851ȱ 48ȱ 532ȱ CHERAMOECAȱ 1850ȱ 1851ȱ 49ȱ 532ȱ Ripariaȱpaludicolaȱminorȱ 1850ȱ 1851ȱ 49ȱ 533ȱ TACHYCINETAȱ 1850ȱ 1851ȱ 48ȱ 533ȱ Tachycinetaȱmeyeniȱ 1850ȱ 1851ȱ 48ȱ 536ȱ Ptyonoprogneȱobsoletaȱobsoletaȱ 1850ȱ 1851ȱ 50ȱ 537ȱ PETROCHELIDONȱ 1850ȱ 1851ȱ 47ȱ 543ȱ CHERSOMANESȱ 1851ȱ 1851ȱ 126ȱ 545ȱ AMMOMANESȱ 1851ȱ 1851ȱ 125ȱ 546ȱ Calandrellaȱrufescensȱminorȱ 1851ȱ 1851ȱ 123ȱ 550ȱ Eremopterixȱnigricepsȱmelanauchenȱ 1851ȱ 1851ȱ 124ȱ 586ȱ Idunaȱpallidaȱopacaȱ 1850ȱ 1851ȱ 36ȱ 601ȱ Malacopteronȱcinereumȱrufifronsȱ 1850ȱ 1851ȱ 65ȱ 602ȱ Pomatorhinusȱmontanusȱbornensisȱ 1851ȱ 1851ȱ 84ȱ 608ȱ Macronousȱgularisȱjavanicusȱ 1851ȱ 1851ȱ 77ȱ 633ȱ Campylorhynchusȱgriseusȱminorȱ 1851ȱ 1851ȱ 80ȱ 635ȱ CISTOTHORUSȱ 1850ȱ 1851ȱ 77ȱ 638ȱ Thryothorusȱleucotisȱvenezuelanusȱ 1851ȱ 1851ȱ 78ȱ 648ȱ Mimusȱgilvusȱgracilisȱ 1852ȱ 1851ȱ 83ȱ 654ȱ Acridotheresȱjavanicusȱ 1851ȱ 1851ȱ 205ȱ 662ȱ Zootheraȱheineiȱheineiȱ 1850ȱ 1850ȱ 6ȱ 664ȱ CICHLOPSISȱ 1851ȱ 1851ȱ 54ȱ 664ȱ Cichlopsisȱleucogenysȱleucogenysȱ 1851ȱ 1851ȱ 54ȱ 664ȱ Catharusȱaurantiirostrisȱmelpomeneȱ 1850ȱ 1850ȱ 5ȱ 670ȱ Turdusȱamaurochalimusȱ 1850ȱ 1850ȱ 5ȱ 671ȱ Turdusȱassimilisȱassimilisȱ 1850ȱ 1850ȱ 4ȱ 679ȱ Cercotrichasȱgalactotesȱminorȱ 1850ȱ 1851ȱ 39ȱ 687ȱ MYRMECOCICHLAȱ 1850ȱ 1850ȱ 8ȱ 687ȱ Myrmecocichlaȱaethiopsȱaethiopsȱ 1850ȱ 1850ȱ 8ȱ 687ȱ THAMNOLAEAȱ 1850ȱ 1850ȱ 8ȱ 695ȱ EUMYIASȱ 1850ȱ 1851ȱ 53ȱ 695ȱ Eumyiasȱthalassoidesȱthalassoidesȱȱ 1850ȱ 1851ȱ 53ȱ 703ȱ CHALCOPARIAȱ 1851ȱ 1851ȱ 103ȱ 705ȱ HEDYDIPNAȱ 1851ȱ 1851ȱ 101ȱ 705ȱ ANTHOBAPHESȱ 1850ȱ 1851ȱ 103ȱ 707ȱ LEPTOCOMAȱ 1850ȱ 1851ȱ 104ȱ 708ȱfnȱ CHALCOSTETHAȱ 1850ȱ 1851ȱ 103ȱ 712ȱ AETHOPYGAȱ 1851ȱ 1851ȱ 103ȱ 721ȱ Ploceusȱvelatusȱnigrifronsȱ 1850ȱ 1851ȱ 182ȱ 725ȱ Euplectesȱcapensisȱapproximansȱ 1851ȱ 1851ȱ 177ȱ EdwardȱC.ȱDickinsonȱ&ȱColinȱJonesȱ 85ȱ ZoologicalȱBibliographyȱ2012ȱ2(2&3)ȱ
Dateȱusedȱ Dateȱnowȱȱ Pageȱinȱ Pageȱ Nameȱofȱtaxonȱ inȱ2003ȱ recommendedȱ Mus.ȱHein.ȱ 728ȱ LAGONOSTICTAȱ 1851ȱ 1851ȱ 171ȱ 729ȱ URAEGINTHUSȱ 1851ȱ 1851ȱ 171ȱ 730ȱ Estrildaȱrufibarbaȱ 1851ȱ 1851ȱ 169ȱ 749ȱ Carduelisȱchlorisȱaurantiiventrisȱ 1851ȱ 1851ȱ 158ȱ 753ȱ RHODOPECHYSȱ 1851ȱ 1851ȱ 157ȱ 753ȱ BUCANETESȱ 1851ȱ 1851ȱ 164ȱ 759ȱ Paroreomyzaȱmaculataȱ 1850ȱ 1851ȱ 100ȱ 759ȱ HIMATIONEȱ 1851ȱ 1851ȱ 99ȱ 765ȱ EUTHLYPISȱ 1850ȱ 1850ȱ 18ȱ 769ȱ AMBLYCERCUSȱ 1851ȱ 1851ȱ 190ȱ 773ȱ Molothrusȱaeneusȱarmentiiȱ 1851ȱ 1851ȱ 192ȱ 776ȱ Coerebaȱflaveolaȱluteolaȱ 1851ȱ 1851ȱ 96ȱ 776ȱ Coerebaȱflaveolaȱguianensisȱ 1850ȱ 1851ȱ 97ȱ 776ȱ Coerebaȱflaveolaȱchloropygaȱ 1850ȱ 1851ȱ 97ȱ 780ȱ Emberizaȱpallasiȱpallasiȱ 1851ȱ 1851ȱ 130ȱ 785ȱ Spizellaȱatrogularisȱatrogularisȱ 1851ȱ 1851ȱ 133ȱ 786ȱ Aimophilaȱhumeralisȱ 1851ȱ 1851ȱ 132ȱ 788ȱ HAPLOSPIZAȱ 1851ȱ 1851ȱ 147ȱ 789ȱ Haplospizaȱunicolorȱ 1851ȱ 1851ȱ 147ȱ 789ȱ DONACOSPIZAȱ 1851ȱ 1851ȱ 136ȱ 791ȱ Sicalisȱcolumbianaȱcolumbianaȱ 1851ȱ 1851ȱ 147ȱ 792ȱ Sporophilaȱintermediaȱintermediaȱ 1851ȱ 1851ȱ 149ȱ 793ȱ Sporophilaȱhypoxanthaȱ 1851ȱ 1851ȱ 150ȱ 793ȱ Sporophilaȱruficollisȱ 1851ȱ 1851ȱ 150ȱ 793ȱ ORYZOBORUSȱ 1851ȱ 1851ȱ 151ȱ 794ȱ Oryzoborusȱmaximilianiȱmaximilianiȱ 1851ȱ 1851ȱ 151ȱ 798ȱ Melozoneȱkieneriȱrubricataȱ 1851ȱ 1851ȱ 140ȱ 802ȱ CORYPHOSPINGUSȱ 1851ȱ 1851ȱ 145ȱ 802ȱ ORCHESTICUSȱ 1851ȱ 1851ȱ 143ȱ 803ȱ Cissopisȱleverianusȱmajorȱ 1851ȱ 1851ȱ 144ȱ 803ȱ HEMISPINGUSȱ 1851ȱ 1851ȱ 138ȱ 804ȱ THLYPOPSISȱ 1851ȱ 1851ȱ 138ȱ 804ȱ Thlypopsisȱfulvicepsȱfulvicepsȱ 1851ȱ 1851ȱ 138ȱ 805ȱ PYRRHOCOMAȱ 1851ȱ 1851ȱ 138ȱ 805ȱ TRICHOTHRAUPISȱ 1850ȱ 1850ȱ 23ȱ 807ȱ Thraupisȱglaucocolpaȱ 1850ȱ 1850ȱ 28ȱ 808ȱ BUTHRAUPISȱ 1850ȱ 1850ȱ 29ȱ 811ȱ Tangaraȱguttataȱguttataȱ 1850ȱ 1850ȱ 26ȱ 811ȱ Tangaraȱpreciosaȱ 1850ȱ 1850ȱ 27ȱ 811ȱ Tagaraȱvitriolinaȱ 1850ȱ 1850ȱ 28ȱ 812ȱ Tangaraȱheineiȱ 1850ȱ 1850ȱ 31ȱ 814ȱ Cyanerpesȱcaeruleusȱlongirostrisȱ(originalȱspellingȱ 1850ȱ 1851ȱ 96ȱ longirostristris;ȱcorrectedȱtoȱlongirostrisȱonȱp.ȱ[234]ȱ Druckfehler).ȱ EdwardȱC.ȱDickinsonȱ&ȱColinȱJonesȱ 86ȱ ZoologicalȱBibliographyȱ2012ȱ2(2&3)ȱ
Dateȱusedȱ Dateȱnowȱȱ Pageȱinȱ Pageȱ Nameȱofȱtaxonȱ inȱ2003ȱ recommendedȱ Mus.ȱHein.ȱ 814ȱ Cyanerpesȱcyaneusȱeximiusȱ 1850ȱ 1851ȱ 96ȱ 814ȱ Cyanerpesȱcyaneusȱbrevipesȱ 1850ȱ 1851ȱ 96ȱ 814ȱ HEMITHRAUPISȱ 1850ȱ 1850ȱ 21ȱ 816ȱ Diglossaȱsittoidesȱhyperythraȱ 1850ȱ 1851ȱ 97ȱ 817ȱ CHLOROSPINGUSȱ 1851ȱ 1851ȱ 139ȱ 824ȱ Caryothraustesȱcanadensisȱbrasiliensisȱ 1851ȱ 1851ȱ 144ȱ 824ȱ Saltatorȱmaximusȱgigantodesȱ 1851ȱ 1851ȱ 142ȱ 825ȱ Saltatorȱmaxillosusȱ 1851ȱ 1851ȱ 142ȱ ȱ
AȱCASEȱOFȱCONFLICTINGȱEVIDENCEȱWITHOUTȱCORROBORATIONȱ AsȱregardsȱtheȱVoyageȱautourȱduȱmondeȱsurȱlaȱfrégateȱLaȱVenusȱtreatedȱonȱp.ȱ129ȱonȱPriority!ȱ ColinȱrememberedȱtheȱarticleȱbyȱLafresnayeȱ(1842)ȱ(whoȱalsoȱusedȱtheȱnameȱdeȱLaȱFresnaye)ȱ whereinȱ areȱ mentionedȱ severalȱ speciesȱ collectedȱ duringȱ theȱ expeditionȱ andȱ someȱ ofȱ theȱ plates,ȱdespiteȱwhichȱtheȱdateȱ1846ȱwasȱretainedȱbyȱDickinsonȱetȱal.ȱ(2011)ȱforȱtheȱpublicationȱ ofȱ theȱ plates.ȱ Theȱ authorityȱ forȱ 1846ȱ isȱ Zimmerȱ (1926)ȱ andȱ heȱ referredȱ toȱ Sherbornȱ &ȱ Woodwardȱ(1901)ȱwhereȱitȱisȱstatedȱthatȱtheȱplateȱlistȱdatesȱfromȱ1846.ȱThisȱdateȱmay,ȱinȱfact,ȱ relateȱtoȱtheȱcompletionȱofȱtheȱset,ȱandȱitȱisȱpossibleȱthatȱtheyȱwereȱissuedȱinȱpartsȱearlierȱbutȱ noȱ evidenceȱ ofȱ thisȱ seemsȱ toȱ haveȱ beenȱ reported.ȱ Thusȱ Lafresnayeȱ mayȱ haveȱ seenȱ proofsȱ ratherȱ thanȱ issuedȱ plates.ȱ Beȱ thatȱ asȱ itȱ may,ȱ Lafresnayeȱ describesȱ Grallariaȱ squamigera,ȱ GrallariaȱGuatimalensisȱandȱArremonȱrufiȬvertex,ȱattributingȱallȱthreeȱnamesȱtoȱFlorentȬPrévost.ȱ Atȱ thisȱ periodȱ itȱ wasȱ commonȱ forȱ authorshipȱ ofȱ aȱ nameȱ toȱ beȱ creditedȱ byȱ theȱ authorȱ ofȱ aȱ paperȱtoȱwhosoeverȱhadȱcoinedȱtheȱname.ȱThereȱseemsȱtoȱbeȱlittleȱdoubtȱthatȱsuchȱtributesȱ wereȱintendedȱtoȱresultȱinȱenduringȱattribution.ȱThisȱintentȱhasȱbeenȱoverriddenȱinȱmodernȱ times.ȱAsȱtheȱrulesȱofȱnomenclatureȱexpandedȱtoȱaddressȱmoreȱandȱmoreȱissuesȱitȱbecameȱ acceptedȱthatȱcreditȱshouldȱnotȱattachȱtoȱanȱauthorȱnotȱinvolvedȱinȱpublication.ȱInȱthisȱcaseȱ PrévostȱwasȱtheȱauthorȱforȱtheȱtextȱinȱtheȱVoyage,ȱandȱthatȱtextȱmayȱwellȱhaveȱbeenȱwritten,ȱ butȱitȱwasȱnotȱpublished.ȱThus,ȱbyȱdefault,ȱprecedenceȱrequiresȱtheseȱnamesȱtoȱbeȱattributedȱ toȱLafresnaye,ȱ1842.ȱInȱTableȱLXVIȱlinesȱ 594ȱandȱ595ȱcorrectlyȱreflectȱtheȱdateȱchangeȱandȱ referȱtoȱpageȱ129,ȱalthoughȱthereȱisȱnoȱexplanationȱtoȱbeȱfoundȱthereȱforȱtheȱuseȱofȱ1842;ȱbut,ȱ inȱaddition,ȱtableȱLXVIȱfailsȱtoȱreflectȱtheȱchangeȱofȱauthorshipȱofȱtheseȱnames.ȱ
OTHERȱUNRESOLVEDȱISSUESȱ Thereȱ isȱ someȱ evidence,ȱ discussedȱ inȱ Dickinsonȱ etȱ al.ȱ (2011:ȱ 76–77),ȱ thatȱ theȱ secondȱ volumeȱofȱBonaparte’sȱConspectusȱGenerumȱAviumȱmayȱhaveȱbeenȱmadeȱavailableȱinȱparts.ȱ QuiteȱaȱnumberȱofȱnamesȱwereȱproposedȱbyȱBonaparteȱduringȱtheȱperiodȱ1851ȱtoȱ1857ȱandȱ whileȱ someȱ areȱ citedȱ fromȱ thisȱ volumeȱ noȱ reportȱ hasȱ beenȱ publishedȱ ofȱ aȱ thoroughȱ examinationȱ ofȱ hisȱ otherȱ publicationsȱ inȱ thisȱ periodȱ toȱ seeȱ whichȱ namesȱ wereȱ inȱ factȱ publishedȱinȱearlierȱworksȱthanȱtheȱConspectus.ȱThisȱchallengeȱremains.ȱ Regardingȱd’Orbigny’sȱVoyageȱdansȱl’Amériqueȱméridionale,ȱdiscussedȱinȱDickinsonȱetȱal.ȱ (2011:ȱ 88–89),ȱ thereȱ isȱ aȱ needȱ toȱ compileȱ inȱ oneȱ reportȱ theȱ informationȱ publishedȱ inȱ theȱ Magasinȱ deȱ Zoologieȱ andȱ inȱ theȱ textȱ andȱ platesȱ ofȱ theȱ book.ȱ Sinceȱ theȱ platesȱ inȱ someȱ casesȱ appearedȱ beforeȱ theȱ relatedȱ textȱ ofȱ theȱ Voyage,ȱ someȱ taxonȱ nameȱ datesȱ mayȱ requireȱ correction.ȱThisȱcompilationȱisȱbeingȱpreparedȱforȱseparateȱpublication.ȱHowever,ȱitȱseemsȱ EdwardȱC.ȱDickinsonȱ&ȱColinȱJonesȱ 87ȱ ZoologicalȱBibliographyȱ2012ȱ2(2&3)ȱ likelyȱ thatȱ mattersȱ willȱ stillȱ notȱ beȱ reliablyȱ resolvedȱ becauseȱ theȱ onlyȱ reportedȱ setȱ ofȱ wrappersȱ(seeȱSherbornȱ&ȱGriffin,ȱ1934)ȱalmostȱcertainlyȱpassedȱintoȱprivateȱhandsȱ(Anthonyȱ Payne,ȱpers.ȱcomm.ȱJan.ȱ2007)ȱandȱcannotȱnowȱbeȱlocated,ȱwhileȱtheȱcarefulȱlistȱthenȱmadeȱhasȱ alsoȱdisappearedȱandȱtheȱinformationȱpublishedȱleavesȱgapsȱandȱisȱsomewhatȱcontradictory.ȱȱȱ TheȱVoyageȱautourȱduȱMondeȱȱ...ȱsurȱlaȱCorvetteȱdeȱSaȱMajesté,ȱLaȱCoquilleȱalsoȱawaitsȱaȱfullerȱ paper,ȱandȱagainȱtheȱnecessaryȱresearchȱhasȱbeenȱconductedȱandȱtheȱpaperȱisȱinȱpreparation.ȱ Inȱthisȱwork,ȱwhereȱnamesȱappearedȱinȱplateȱcaptionsȱandȱagainȱinȱtheȱtext,ȱtheȱplatesȱwereȱ alwaysȱearlierȱthanȱtheȱrelevantȱtext.ȱThisȱwasȱmadeȱclearȱinȱTableȱVIIIȱofȱPriority!ȱBut,ȱasȱ mentionedȱthereinȱonȱp.ȱ122,ȱ“manyȱnamesȱwereȱfirstȱpublishedȱelsewhere”.ȱInȱmostȱsuchȱ casesȱ theȱ earlierȱ publicationȱ wasȱ inȱ Lesson’sȱ Manuelȱ d’Ornithologie.ȱ Thisȱ work,ȱ inȱ twoȱ volumes,ȱappearedȱinȱJuneȱ1828ȱandȱisȱdatedȱfromȱ28ȱJune.ȱȱInȱaȱfewȱinstancesȱpublicationȱ wasȱevenȱearlier.ȱTwoȱpigeonsȱ(ColumbaȱoceanicaȱLessonȱ&ȱGarnotȱandȱColumbaȱzoeœȱLesson)ȱ wereȱdescribedȱ–ȱrespectivelyȱonȱpp.ȱ316ȱandȱ314ȱ–ȱinȱvol.ȱ40ȱofȱtheȱDictionnaireȱdesȱSciencesȱ naturelles inȱ textȱ providedȱ byȱ Desmarestȱ (1826).ȱ Mathewsȱ (1913)ȱ consideredȱ Desmarestȱ shouldȱ beȱ seenȱ asȱ theȱ publishedȱ authorȱ ofȱ theseȱ names,ȱ bothȱ ofȱ whichȱ wereȱ MSȱ namesȱ intendedȱforȱlaterȱpublicationȱbyȱtheȱindividualsȱindicated.ȱUnderȱtheȱpresentȱeditionȱofȱtheȱ InternationalȱCodeȱofȱZoologicalȱNomenclatureȱ(I.C.Z.N.,ȱ1999)ȱthatȱinterpretationȱseemsȱcorrect.ȱ Noteȱthat,ȱasȱexhibitedȱabove,ȱtheȱdipthongȱreadsȱasȱanȱoeȱdipthongȱbutȱwouldȱbeȱexpectedȱ toȱbeȱformedȱasȱanȱaeȱdipthongȱandȱisȱusuallyȱsoȱinterpreted.ȱItȱshouldȱbeȱnoted,ȱalthoughȱ thisȱhasȱnotȱbeenȱdeeplyȱresearched,ȱthatȱLessonȱwasȱlaterȱinvitedȱtoȱauthorȱsomeȱsectionsȱofȱ theȱornithologicalȱtextȱinȱthisȱdictionary;ȱindeedȱthisȱseemsȱtoȱhaveȱbegunȱtheȱsameȱyearȱinȱ volumeȱ42.ȱ
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTSȱ Becauseȱthisȱpaperȱderivesȱfromȱtheȱcareful,ȱcriticalȱworkȱofȱCJȱitȱisȱonlyȱappropriateȱthatȱ ECDȱthankȱhimȱfirstȱforȱhisȱhelp.ȱTheȱunderlyingȱworkȱonȱtheȱbookȱinȱwhichȱECDȱhadȱtheȱ helpȱofȱLeslieȱOverstreet,ȱBobȱDowsettȱandȱMurrayȱBruceȱalsoȱdeservesȱthanksȱandȱthanksȱ mustȱgoȱtoȱthemȱforȱmuchȱencouragement.ȱWeȱmuchȱappreciateȱtheȱhelpȱextendedȱinȱtheȱuseȱ ofȱ essentialȱ libraryȱ facilitiesȱ byȱ Alisonȱ Hardingȱ ofȱ theȱ Naturalȱ Historyȱ Museum,ȱ Tring.ȱ Thanksȱ alsoȱ goȱ toȱ Normandȱ Davidȱ forȱ hisȱ interestȱ inȱ theȱ Voyageȱ autourȱ duȱ Mondeȱ ...ȱ surȱ laȱ CorvetteȱdeȱSaȱMajesté,ȱLaȱCoquilleȱandȱtoȱJamesȱJoblingȱforȱhelpȱwithȱGould’sȱworkȱandȱforȱ readingȱaȱdraftȱofȱthisȱpaper.ȱThanksȱalsoȱgoȱtoȱBobȱDowsettȱandȱRichardȱSchoddeȱforȱsomeȱ corrections.ȱ
REFERENCESȱ
Baker,ȱE.C.S.,ȱ1920.ȱ[RemarksȱonȱsomeȱOrientalȱspecies].ȱ–ȱBulletinȱofȱtheȱBritishȱOrnithologistsȇȱClub,ȱ40ȱ (ccl):ȱ112Ȭ117.ȱ
Banks,ȱ R.C.,ȱ 2012.ȱ Review:ȱ Priority!ȱ Theȱ Datingȱ ofȱ Scientificȱ Namesȱ inȱ Ornithology:ȱ aȱ Directoryȱ toȱ theȱ LiteratureȱandȱitsȱReviewers.ȱ–ȱAuk,ȱ129ȱ(2):ȱ358Ȭ359.ȱ
Banks,ȱR.C.ȱ&ȱM.R.ȱBrowning,ȱ1979.ȱCorrectȱcitationsȱforȱsomeȱNorthȱAmericanȱbirdȱtaxa.ȱ–ȱProceedingsȱ ofȱtheȱBiologicalȱSocietyȱofȱWashington,ȱ92ȱ(1):ȱ195Ȭ203.ȱ
Barclay,ȱM.,ȱ2012.ȱBookȱreview:ȱPriority!ȱTheȱDatingȱofȱScientificȱNamesȱinȱOrnithology:ȱaȱDirectoryȱtoȱtheȱ LiteratureȱandȱitsȱReviewers.ȱ–ȱBulletinȱofȱZoologicalȱNomenclature,ȱ69ȱ(1):ȱ81Ȭ82.ȱ EdwardȱC.ȱDickinsonȱ&ȱColinȱJonesȱ 88ȱ ZoologicalȱBibliographyȱ2012ȱ2(2&3)ȱ
Bock,ȱ W.J.ȱ &ȱ R.ȱ Schodde,ȱ 1997.ȱ Caseȱ 3044.ȱ Proposedȱ suppressionȱ ofȱ allȱ priorȱ usagesȱ ofȱ genericȱ andȱ specificȱnamesȱofȱbirdsȱ(Aves)ȱbyȱJohnȱGouldȱandȱothersȱconventionallyȱacceptedȱasȱpublishedȱinȱtheȱ ProceedingsȱofȱtheȱZoologicalȱSocietyȱofȱLondon.ȱ–ȱBulletinȱofȱZoologicalȱNomenclature,ȱ54ȱ(3):ȱ172Ȭ181.ȱ
Browning,ȱ M.R.ȱ &ȱ B.L.ȱ Monroe,ȱ Jr.,ȱ 1991.ȱ Clarificationsȱ andȱ correctionsȱofȱ theȱ datesȱ ofȱ issueȱofȱ someȱ publicationsȱ containingȱ descriptionsȱ ofȱ Northȱ Americanȱ birds.ȱ –ȱ Archivesȱ ofȱ Naturalȱ History,ȱ 18ȱ (3):ȱȱ 381Ȭ405.ȱ
Bruce,ȱ M.D.ȱ &ȱ I.A.W.ȱ McAllan,ȱ 1991.ȱ Someȱ problemsȱ inȱ vertebrateȱ nomenclature.ȱ II.ȱ Birds.ȱ Partȱ 1.ȱ –ȱ Bollettinoȱ/ȱMuseoȱRegionaleȱdiȱScienzeȱNaturaliȱ(Torino),ȱ8ȱ(2):ȱ453Ȭ485ȱ(1990).ȱ
Buturlin,ȱS.A.,ȱ1910.ȱPericrocotusȱspeciosusȱfohkiensisȱsubsp.ȱnov.ȱ–ȱOrnithlogicheskiiȱVestnik,ȱ(4)ȱ1:ȱ263.ȱ
Daudin,ȱ F.M.,ȱ 1802.ȱ Tableauȱ desȱ divisions.ȱ In:ȱ deȱ Buffonȇsȱ Histoireȱ Naturelle,ȱ Quadrupèdes.,ȱ 14.ȱ –ȱ Didotȱ (Ed.),ȱParis.ȱȱȱ
Deignan,ȱ H.G.,ȱ 1960.ȱ Passeriformes:ȱ suborderȱ Oscines,ȱ familyȱ Campephagidaeȱ (Pericrocotus,ȱ Hemipus,ȱ Tephrodornis),ȱ(pp.ȱ207Ȭ221).ȱIn:ȱCheckȬlistȱofȱBirdsȱofȱtheȱWorld.ȱAȱcontinuationȱofȱtheȱworkȱofȱJamesȱL.ȱPeters.ȱ IX.ȱE.ȱMayrȱ&ȱJ.C.ȱGreenway,ȱJr.ȱ(Eds.).ȱ–ȱMuseumȱofȱComparativeȱZoology,ȱCambridge,ȱMass.ȱȱȱ
Desmarest,ȱ A.ȬG.,ȱ 1826.ȱ Pigeon,ȱ (pp.ȱ 295Ȭ377).ȱ In:ȱ Dictionnaireȱ desȱ Sciencesȱ naturelles.ȱ 40ȱ (PHOR–PIM).ȱȱ 1Ȭ492.ȱ–ȱF.G.ȱLevraultȱ(Ed.).ȱȱParis.ȱ
Dickinson,ȱE.C.ȱ(ed.)ȱ2003.ȱTheȱHowardȱ&ȱMooreȱCompleteȱChecklistȱofȱtheȱBirdsȱofȱtheȱWorld.ȱȱRevisedȱandȱ enlarged,ȱ3rd.ȱed.ȱ1Ȭ1039.ȱ–ȱChristopherȱHelm,ȱLondon.ȱ
Dickinson,ȱE.C.,ȱ2004.ȱSystematicȱnotesȱonȱAsianȱbirds.ȱ46.ȱ‘AȱCatalogueȱofȱtheȱBirdsȱinȱtheȱMuseumȱofȱ theȱHon.ȱEastȬIndiaȱCompany’ȱbyȱHorsfieldȱ&ȱMoore.ȱ–ȱZoologischeȱVerhandelingen,ȱ350:ȱ149Ȭ165.ȱ
Dickinson,ȱ E.C.,ȱ 2011.ȱ Vieillot’sȱ Histoireȱ naturelleȱ desȱ oiseauxȱ deȱ lȇAmériqueȱ septentrionale,ȱ depuisȱ Saintȱ DominiqueȱjusquȇàȱlaȱbaieȱdeȱHudson;ȱcontenantȱunȱgrandȱnombreȱdȇespècesȱdécritesȱouȱfiguréesȱpourȱlaȱpremièreȱ fois.ȱ–ȱZoologicalȱBibliography,ȱ1ȱ(3):ȱ136.ȱ
Dickinson,ȱE.C.,ȱ2012.ȱTheȱfirstȱtwentyȱlivraisonsȱofȱ“LesȱPlanchesȱColoriéesȱd’Oiseaux”ȱofȱTemminckȱ&ȱ Laugierȱ(1820–1839):ȱIV.ȱDiscoveryȱofȱtheȱremainingȱwrappers.ȱ–ȱZoologicalȱBibliography,ȱ2ȱ(1):ȱ35Ȭ49.ȱ
Dickinson,ȱE.C.,ȱM.D.ȱBruceȱ&ȱR.J.ȱDowsett,ȱ2006.ȱVivariumȱnaturaeȱorȱtheȱnaturalist’sȱmiscellanyȱ(1789– 1813)ȱ byȱ Georgeȱ Shaw:ȱ anȱ assessmentȱ ofȱ theȱ datingȱ ofȱ theȱ partsȱ andȱ volumes.ȱ –ȱ Archivesȱ ofȱ Naturalȱ History,ȱ33ȱ(2):ȱ322Ȭ343.ȱ
Dickinson,ȱE.C.,ȱV.M.ȱLoskot,ȱH.ȱMorioka,ȱS.ȱSomadikartaȱ&ȱR.ȱvanȱdenȱElzen,ȱ2006.ȱSystematicȱnotesȱonȱ Asianȱbirds.ȱ50.ȱTypesȱofȱtheȱAegithalidae,ȱRemizidaeȱandȱParidae.ȱ–ȱZoologischeȱMededelingen,ȱ80ȱ(5):ȱ65Ȭ 111.ȱ
Dickinson,ȱE.C.,ȱL.K.ȱOverstreet,ȱR.J.ȱDowsettȱ&ȱM.D.ȱBruce,ȱ2011.ȱPriority!ȱTheȱdatingȱofȱscientificȱnamesȱ inȱornithology.ȱ1Ȭ319.ȱ–ȱAvesȱPress,ȱNorthampton.ȱ
Dickinson,ȱ E.C.,ȱ L.K.ȱ Overstreet,ȱ M.D.ȱ Bruceȱ &ȱ R.J.ȱ Dowsett,ȱ 2011.ȱ Jardine’sȱ “Contributionsȱ toȱ Ornithology”ȱ1848–1853.ȱII.ȱPageȱandȱplateȱnumberingȱandȱissueȱlimits.ȱ–ȱZoologicalȱBibliography,ȱ1ȱ(2):ȱ 44Ȭ66.ȱ
Duncan,ȱF.M.,ȱ1937.ȱOnȱtheȱdatesȱofȱpublicationȱofȱtheȱSociety’sȱ“Proceedings”,ȱ1859–1926.ȱ–ȱProceedingsȱ ofȱtheȱZoologicalȱSocietyȱofȱLondon:ȱ71Ȭ83.ȱ EdwardȱC.ȱDickinsonȱ&ȱColinȱJonesȱ 89ȱ ZoologicalȱBibliographyȱ2012ȱ2(2&3)ȱ
Gill,ȱB.J.,ȱB.D.ȱBell,ȱG.K.ȱChambers,ȱD.G.ȱMedway,ȱR.L.ȱPalma,ȱR.P.ȱScofield,ȱA.J.D.ȱTennysonȱ&ȱT.H.ȱ Worthy,ȱ2010.ȱChecklistȱofȱtheȱbirdsȱofȱNewȱZealand,ȱNorfolkȱandȱMacquarieȱIslandsȱandȱtheȱRossȱDependency,ȱ Antarctica.ȱiȬx,ȱ1Ȭ501.ȱ–ȱTeȱPapaȱPress,ȱWellington,ȱN.Z.ȱ
Greenway,ȱJ.C.,ȱJr.,ȱ1962.ȱPasseriformes:ȱsuborderȱOscines,ȱfamilyȱOriolidae,ȱ(pp.ȱ122Ȭ137).ȱIn:ȱCheckȬlistȱ ofȱBirdsȱofȱtheȱWorld.ȱAȱcontinuationȱofȱtheȱworkȱofȱJamesȱL.ȱPeters.,ȱ15.ȱȱE.ȱMayrȱ&ȱJ.C.ȱGreenway,ȱJr.ȱ(Eds.).ȱ –ȱMuseumȱofȱComparativeȱZoology,ȱCambridge,ȱMassachusetts.ȱ
I.C.Z.N.ȱ (Internationalȱ Commissionȱ onȱ Zoologicalȱ Nomenclature),ȱ 2003.ȱ Opinionȱ 2026ȱ (Caseȱ 3044)ȱ Genericȱandȱ specificȱ namesȱ ofȱbirdsȱ (Aves)ȱ coventionallyȱ acceptedȱ asȱ publishedȱ inȱ theȱProceedingsȱ orȱ Transactionsȱ ofȱ theȱ Zoologicalȱ Societyȱ ofȱ Londonȱ andȱ monographicȱ worksȱ byȱ Johnȱ Gouldȱ andȱ otherȱ contemporaryȱ zoologists:ȱ suppressionȱ ofȱ priorȱ usagesȱ notȱ approved.ȱ –ȱ Bulletinȱ ofȱ Zoologicalȱ Nomenclature,ȱ60ȱ(1):ȱ79Ȭ80.ȱ
Knox,ȱA.,ȱ2012.ȱReview:ȱPriority!ȱTheȱDatingȱofȱScientificȱNamesȱinȱOrnithology:ȱaȱDirectoryȱtoȱtheȱLiteratureȱ andȱitsȱReviewers.ȱ–ȱIbis,ȱ154ȱ(3):ȱ643Ȭ644.ȱ
Lafresnaye,ȱN.F.A.A.,ȱde,ȱ1842.ȱOiseauxȱnouveauxȱdeȱColombie.ȱ–ȱRévueȱZoologique,ȱ5:ȱ333Ȭ336.ȱ
Lawrence,ȱG.N.,ȱ1861.ȱDescriptionsȱofȱthreeȱnewȱspeciesȱofȱHummingbirdsȱofȱtheȱgeneraȱHeliomaster,ȱ AmaziliaȱandȱMellisuga.ȱ–ȱAnnalsȱofȱtheȱLyceumȱofȱNaturalȱHistory,ȱ7:ȱ107Ȭ111.ȱȱȱ
Mathews,ȱG.M.,ȱ1913.ȱDatesȱofȱpublicationȱofȱplatesȱofȱtheȱ“Ornithologyȱ…ȱofȱtheȱ‘Coquille’”.ȱ–ȱAustralȱ AvianȱRecord,ȱ2ȱ(2/3):ȱ49Ȭ54.ȱ
McAllan,ȱI.A.W.,ȱ2004.ȱCorrectionsȱtoȱtheȱoriginalȱcitationsȱandȱtypeȱlocalitiesȱofȱsomeȱbirdsȱdescribedȱ byȱJohnȱGouldȱandȱrecordedȱfromȱNewȱZealand.ȱ–ȱNotornis,ȱ51:ȱ125Ȭ130.ȱ
McAllan,ȱI.A.W.ȱ&ȱM.D.ȱBruce,ȱ2002.ȱSystematicȱnotesȱonȱAsianȱbirds.ȱ27.ȱOnȱtheȱdatesȱofȱpublicationȱofȱ Johnȱ Gould’sȱ “Aȱ Centuryȱ ofȱ Birdsȱ fromȱ theȱ Himalayaȱ Mountains”.ȱ –ȱ Zoologischeȱ Verhandelingen,ȱ 340:ȱ 161Ȭ177.ȱ
Mlíkovsky,ȱJ.,ȱ2012.ȱTheȱdatingȱofȱCabanis’sȱ“Museumȱheineanum:ȱSingvögel”.ȱ–ȱZoologicalȱBibliography,ȱ2ȱ (1):ȱ18Ȭ26.ȱȱ
Quaisser,ȱ C.ȱ &ȱ E.C.ȱ Dickinson,ȱ 2011.ȱ Cabanis,ȱ J.ȱ (“1850–1851”).ȱ Museumȱ Heineanum.ȱ In:ȱ Dickinson,ȱ E.C.,ȱ L.K.ȱ Overstreet,ȱ R.J.ȱ Dowsettȱ &ȱ M.D.ȱ Bruce,ȱ 2011.ȱ Priority!ȱ Theȱ datingȱ ofȱ scientificȱ namesȱ inȱ ornithology.ȱ1Ȭ319.ȱ–ȱAvesȱPress,ȱNorthampton.ȱ
Sauer,ȱ G.,ȱ 1982.ȱ Johnȱ Gould;ȱ theȱ Birdȱ Man.ȱ Aȱ chronologyȱ andȱ bibliography.ȱ iȬxxiv,ȱ 1Ȭ416.ȱ –ȱ Henryȱ SotheranȱLtd.,ȱLondon.ȱ
Zimmer,ȱJ.T.,ȱ1926.ȱCatalogueȱofȱtheȱEdwardȱE.ȱAyerȱOrnithologicalȱLibrary.ȱ–ȱFieldȱMuseumȱofȱNaturalȱ History.ȱZoologyȱSeriesȱ16ȱ(2):ȱ365Ȭ706.ȱ
Addresses:ȱEdwardȱC.ȱDickinson,ȱFlatȱ3,ȱBolsoverȱCourt,ȱ19ȱBolsoverȱRoad,ȱEastbourne,ȱBN20ȱ7JG,ȱU.K.ȱ eȬmail:ȱ[email protected].ȱColinȱJones,ȱ41ȱEdmundȱRoad,ȱBrandon,ȱSuffolk,ȱIP27ȱ0XD,ȱU.K.ȱeȬmail:ȱ [email protected].ȱ ȱ
View publication stats