DOCSLIB.ORG

Clcrnl -P=,...,~+·~ Pepqr;Ment of Veterans Affairs &Late Or F9dm'al Agency and Bureau

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Clcrnl -P=,...,~+·~ Pepqr;Ment of Veterans Affairs &Late Or F9dm'al Agency and Bureau ~,,.'·•· NP'84'utiii•G tao.I> :DitBHo.,~18 (ftcl UWllltt_, rr~1 Unbcl8IU11m.partment of 1he ·Interior I ·. HmliaMl4'1ft-.Vlce ~;_) NatloaalReJ1later ·of ~lstoric ·PJacea Mu1Uple1Property Documentation Form -NA.OONAL -EeilSlER T,.-iann.-...ct tor .document~ rnutttple property groups r.iattno to one or _,.,.. historic oontem. SM fN1ruCllona In How to ~ the ~ '"**'Y~lb> Form (National IMglster Butletln 11B). ODrnplete eech tlern by ~ering U. Nqu•rd inifonnaUon. For eddllialiat 9'1Dt .... iiantinUallon ehMtl (Form 1().1()(>.a). UN a typewriter, word proc 111 a.-. ot~rnputer IO camfJIMe al....,.. i ....... ' IHI IN• __ Amended 8ubmbalon A• .__-ef.-Utttpte Property Liiting Civil -War Era National Cemeteries B. --AalCI clMed Hlatortc Cont•xt• IName ..a. 1 11 c Med ht8torto ooncext. Identifying theme, geographical arM, and ctironological period tor each.) lniti.al J>evelopment o! Permanent Memorials to Civil War Soldiers Who Died in l>efensc of the Union - 1861 to 188) c. -Fonn'fll••red by nameltttle J'herese T. Sammartino. St.aff Assistant organiz.8tion J>epartment of veterans Affairs ltrHt & number 810 Vcmnont Avenue. N.'W. telephone (202) 523-3895 zip ooese _....;;;2;..;;.0..... 4 __2 o....._ ___ city or town -Washington, n.C. atate ---------- M tt. •• 'J 11111 eutnomy unoer the Nllllonel HlatOric PrM91...Uon Act of 11M, • llJMflded. I **9b1 oeftlfy lhat thll ooeurn.utlon totm ·- • fl 1# iat Aegl8ter daDumeNllllon etandardt and eet1 tonh ~ tor the lilllng of NIMed prapeftlee ~ with the .......... Rtglltu c:rtterla. Thia eubminion mHll the procedural and pratr•lonal requtremenll Mt forth In 38 CFR ,.an 80 and the &ecrMary of 1tl9 lnl•rlor'1 6tand1n:l1 a'ld Guldelinea tor ArcMOlogy and Hletotlc P .....rvatlon. CD SM contlnueUon eMet tor adclllonal oomrrwnta.) ol:\':c.er &·i\..~~·and lltle t certifying al ~.clcrnl -p=,...,~+·~ pepqr;ment of Veterans Affairs &late or F9dM'al agency and bureau I "8Nb1 oertlty that tttl9 multlpte P'OJ*\Y aocumenlatlon form ha• been approved by the Natlo'lal R9g11tar u a baala tor evaiuatin; 191ated Pf'OPM'lea tor llatlng In the National Reglrter. /f?e/t. ?/~et Qgnature ol the KMper . ~iv.il..War · Era National ies -..ac, ,,,._ f!5cl$lefty .JJlllng PnMde 1M tl' K!G lntormmKll• on continuation ·MMta. Cite 1M .....,Cid 1M tille Deb9.eecfl...ction of 1M nw1Mlw.'l\leigrl111V9 ........,. ~ding.,,._~ for continuation et-. In How ID~ ...Mu1$111t Ptapa1>' OociaiW... I Fomt-(f' ?! Ml Aai .......... 118). Fiii ....... ftlllnDel's tor -=*' eectiorl In the~ ..... E. · .... 1 n•nt of Historic Contexts 1 through 19 ~1hm'I one tlillCn: context la docunwnled. ..__. a.n In~ order.) Appendices A, B, C F. ,. 11 acat8d Property Typee (PnMde dW:r~. 8lgniflcance, 8nd regilb8tion ~.) 1 tnrough 5 G. 4111 agMPtUcal Data 1 through 3 Appendix A H. :.Sulmnary of ldenttflcation and Evaluation Methods coi-- the mMhoda med In ~ng the mullip6e ~ lllllng,) 1 l ~ Blbl&ographlcal Retetwncu .-~ _..... worb 8nd primary location of eddltional documenlation: State 1 ' I 'I I: k: Pr111!WIX>n Olftce. oUwr' State mgency, Feder.i agency, 6ocal ~t. mlls•lllt. or Olher, ..,.atytng ~y . ) P..-. Waft Reduction Act Statement: This information i• being catiected tor application• to the National Regilller of Historic ,..... to nominate ~ies tor listing or dMemune eligibility tor listing. to list ~ies , and to amend existing listings, RI 1si cu• to this ~ ia reQUlr9d to *'8in a benefit in accoraance with the National Hlstonc p,.....,,.tion Act. as amended (16 U.S.C, 470 er -.q.). EM&n..md 9urden Statement: Public reoort1ng burden tor this form is eettmated to a"9raQ9 120 hours per~- including the ttme tor IWlll8Wlng inatructions. gathtmng and maintaining data, and comPleting and 1'9Vt9W!ng the form, Direct commema '9QU'ding this bUrOen .annare or any uoect ot this torm to the Chief, Aam1n18tratrve SeMCea Olvi110n, National Pant Service. P,O, Box 37127, WUhlngtOn, DC 2001~7127 : and the Office of Manaoement and Buoget. Paperworlc ReductlOns Pro,ec:t (1024-0018). Waatt1ng1on, DC 20503. ·! MULTIPLE:PRO RTY-NOMINATJONTO · = :TIONAL iREGIS'EER>,OFdIISTQRICJ>LACE DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAlRS NATIONAL CEMETERIES .'.'CEMETERY YEAR OF ESTABLISHMENT I. 41exandria (VA) 1862 2. ~polis 1862 3. ..camp Butler 1862 -4. -L)press Hills 1862 5. ,;Danville (KY) 1862 6. rort Leavenworth 1862 7. -Fort Scott 1862 8. Keokuk 1862 9. .Loudon Park 1862 10. Mill Springs 1862 11. 'New Albany 1862 12. Philadelphia 1862 13 . Beaufort 1863 14. Cave Hill 1863 15. .Knoxville 1863 16. .Lexington 1863 17. :Rock Island 1863 18. -meverly 1864 19. Mound City 1864 20. Ball's Bluff Listed in National Register ( 4/2 7/84) 21. Florence 1865 22. Mobile Listed in National Register (6/13/86) 23. :Raleigh 1865 24. .Salisbury 1865 25 . Camp Nelson 1866 26. City Point 1866 27. Cold Harbor 1866 28. Corinth 1866 . 29. Crown Hill 1866 30. Danville (VA) 1866 31. Fort Harrison 1866 32. Glendale 1866 33 . Hampton 1866 34. Jefferson Barracks 1866 35 . Marietta 1866 Tecbnical Support Service (401B J AU!?US t 11. 19 9~ MULTIPLE PROPERTY NOMINATION TO NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS NATIONAL CEMETERIES CEMETERY YEAR OF ESTABLISHMENT 36. Nashville 1866 37. Natchez 1866 38. Port Hudson 1866 39. Richmond 1866 40. Seven Pines 1866 41. Staunton 1866 42. Winchester 1866 43. Alexandria (LA) 1867 44. Baton Rouge 1867 45. Chattanooga 1867 46. Culpeper 1867 47. Fayetteville 1867 48. Fort Smith 1867 49. Grafton Listed in National Register (2/ 19/82) 50. Jefferson City 1867 51. Lebanon Listed in National Register (6/5/75) 52. Memphis 1867 53. New Bern 1867 54. San Antonio 1867 55. Springfield 1867 56. Wilmington 1867 57. Barrancas 1868 58. Fort Gibson 1868 59. Little Rock 1868 Technical Support Service (4018) August 12, 1994 ;,·CEMETERIESME NED1NTEXTillUTNO CLUDEDIN MlJLTIPJ.;E;pRQPERTY:NOMINATION ,,DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR NATIONAL CEMETERIES ..CEMETERY YEAR OF ESTABLISHMENT 60. ..Jl\ntietam 1862 61. .Gettysburg 1863 62. 'Battleground 1864 63. :Andersonville 1865 64. Fredericksburg 1865 65. .Stones River 1865 66. Poplar Grove 1866 67. Vicksburg 1866 68 . Yorktown 1866 69. Fort Donelson 1867 70. Shiloh 1867 71. Chalmette 1868 • DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NATIONAL CEMETERIES '.CEMETERY YEAR OF ESTABLISHMENT -72. .-SOidiers' Home 1862 73. ·Arlington 1864 DISCONTINUED NATIONAL CEMETERIES ·CEMETERY YEAR OF ESTABLISHMENT 74. Brownsville 1867 Technical Support Service (401B) August 12, 199-l MULTIPLE PROPERTY NOMINATION TO NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES LISTING OF CEMETERIES BY STATE ALABAMA Mobile* ARKANSAS Fayetteville Fort Smith Little Rock FLORIDA Barrancas GEORGIA Marietta ILLINOIS Camp Butler Mound City Rock Island INDIANA Crown Hill New Albany IOWA Keokuk KANSAS Fort Leavenworth Fort Scott KENTUCKY Camp Nelson Cave Hill Danville Lebanon* Lexington Mill Springs LOUISIANA Alexandria Baton Rouge Port Hudson MARYLAND Annapolis Loudon Park MISSISSIPPI Corinth Natchez MISSOURI Jefferson Barracks Jefferson City Springfield Technical Support Service (401B) August 12, 1994 MULTIPLE PROPERTY NOMINATION TO NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES LISTING OF CEMETERIES BY STATE NEW JERSEY Beverly NEW YORK Cypress Hills NORTH CAROLINA New Bern Raleigh Salisbury Wilmington OKLAHOMA Fort Gibson PENNSYLVANIA Philadelphia SOUTH CAROLINA Beaufort Florence TENNESSEE Chattanooga Knoxville Memphis Nashville TEXAS San Antonio VIRGINIA Alexandria Ball's Bluff* City Point Cold Harbor Culpeper Danville Fort Harrison Glendale Hampton Richmond Seven Pines Staunton Winchester WEST VIRGINIA Grafton* *Already listed in National Register Technical Support Service (4018) August 12, 1994 ... ...... ., _47 .............. w .,_,..,, dlnltMlelwtesiDepadment~f~dnterior tNatiou81'9kService · +National ~egister :-of ~istoric-.PJaces X>cmtinuation Sheet Civil War Era National Cemeteries .&tction11Ull1ber-E-- .Page--- E. STA"DMENT OF IDSTORIC CONTEXTS This text follows, chronologically, the establishment of the cemeteries. SIGNIFICANCE The Civil War era national cemeteries are eligible for the National Register of Historic Places under Criteria A.and C. Their primary significance is from their strong association with the Civil War, 1861- 1865. Additionally, many contain the fine architectural examples of a prototype design of lodges that were ·ex.eaned in various local building materials from the same floor plan. Lastly, the prototype lodges were .4esigned by a significant person associated with facilities during and after the war, Brigadier.General Montgomery C. Meigs, Quartermaster General of the Army from 1861-1882. Many na1;..,.1 cemeteries were established on or near specific Civil War conflict sites. For each of these sateen ::cemeteries, an information sheet is attached, which includes the name and date of the conflict, background information on the establishment of the cemetery, and Civil War monuments or memorials within the cemetery (Appendix A). INTRODUCTION - ANTE-BELLUM PERIOD From very:eariy times, those who died in defense of their state or nation have been deemed worthy of special c:ommeaaoration for their service on the field of battle. The Mexican War of 1846-1847 marked an important advance in American burial policy. The action of the Congress in 1850 in establishing the Mexico City Cemetery as a final resting place for those who "fell in battle or died in and around the said city,• mmished a precedent for the creation of permanent military cemeteries beyond the seas over a decade before legislative provision was made for a national cemeterial system. The development of national cemeteries came about as the American Civil War was waged. This conflict between Northern and Southern citizens was brought about by sharp differences in political and economic issues between the two factions. The two major issues that brought on the war were the fight over states' rights that involved the right of secession from the Union of the states under the Constitution, and the extension of slavery to new states and territories. The immediate provocation for the secession of the states, which led to the war, was the election of Abraham Lincoln as president of the United States in the fall of 1860, on a platform that denied the extension of slavery to new states .....
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Draft Interpretive Master Plan Technical Support Manual - Vol
    FORT MONROE DRAFT INTERPRETIVE MASTER PLAN TECHNICAL SUPPORT MANUAL - VOL. 1 PROJECT #: FMFADA -101-2009 Submitted to the: By: Fort Monroe Federal Area Development Authority Interpretive Solutions, Inc. West Chester, PA 19382 Old Quarters #1 151 Bernard Road In association with: Fort Monroe, VA 23651 Leisure Business Advisors, LLC Richmond, VA 23223 and Trudy O’Reilly Public Relations JUNE 24, 2010 Hampton, VA 23661 Cover illustration credit: "Fortress Monroe, Va. and its vicinity". Jacob Wells, 1865. Publisher: Virtue & Co. Courtesy the Norman B. Leventhal Map Center at the Boston Public Library Fort Monroe Interpretive Master Plan Technical Support Manual June 24, 2010 Interpretive Solutions, Inc. FORT MONROE DRAFT INTERPRETIVE MASTER PLAN TECHNICAL SUPPORT MANUAL Table of Contents Executive Summary . 6 Three Urgent Needs . 7 Part 1: Introduction . 8 1.1. Legislative Powers of the Fort Monroe Authority . 9 1.2. The Programmatic Agreement . 9 1.3 Strategic Goals, Mission and Purpose of the FMA . 10 1.3 The Interpretive Master Plan . 10 1.3.1 Project Background . 11 1.3.2 The National Park Service Planning Model . 12 1.3.3 Phased Approach . 13 1.3.4 Planning Team Overview . 13 1.3.5 Public Participation . 14 Part 2: Background . 16 2.1 The Hampton Roads Setting . 16 2.2 Description of the Resource . 17 2.3 Brief Historical Overview . 19 2.4 Prior Planning . 22 2.5 The Natural Resources Working Group . 22 2.6. The African American Culture Working Group . 22 Part 3: Foundation for Planning . 24 3.1 Significance of Fort Monroe . 24 3.2 Primary Interpretive Themes .
    [Show full text]
  • Illinois at Shiloh
    * o « o ^ •^^ .^^ .-1°^ .HO, »!v: ' '^ * 9.^ ^^^. - ^ •^ o .0^ A 9. <^^ . o > \{ 'i °o . Chicago, Illinois, January, 1905. To the Governor of Illinois: Sir:—The undersigned members of the Illinois Battlefield Commission, appointed by Governor John R. Tanner, under an act passed by the General Assembly of Illinois, approved by the Governor June 9, 1897, and followed by supple- mentary acts, to locate positions and erect monu- ments on the battlefield of Shiloh in honor of the Illinois Troops engaged in the battle, have the honor of submitting a report of what has been accomplished in pursuance of their duties under said acts. Respectfully submitted; Gustav A. Bussey, George Mason, Israel P. Rumsey, Timothy Slattery, Thomas A. Weisner, J. B. Nulton, Isaac Yantis, A. F. McEwen, Benson Wood, Sheldon C. Ayres. Commissioners ILLINOIS AT S H I LO H REPORT OF THE X U \ n 'i Shiloh Battlefield Commission AND CEREMONIES AT THE DEDICATION OF THE MONUMENTS ERECTED TO MARK THE POSITIONS OF THE ILLINOIS COMMANDS ENGAGED IN THE BATTLE The Story of the Battle, by Stanley Waterloo t Compiled by Major George Mason, Secretary of the Commission Illinois at Shiloh THE BATTLE OF SHILOH The Battle of Shiloh, fought April 6 and 7, 1862, was one of the great battles of history, one the importance and quality of which will be more and more recognized as time passes. It was a battle in which were included half a dozen bloody smaller battles, it was a battle where con- ditions were such that there was almost the closeness of conflicts in medieval times, and where regiments and brigades of raw recruits showed in desperate struggle with each other what American courage is.
    [Show full text]
  • Tour Stops Section #11 Battle of Kennesaw Mountain
    1 The Bandy Heritage Center for Northwest Georgia Atlanta Campaign Driving Tour Kennesaw Mountain Tour Stops Section #11 Battle of Kennesaw Mountain Heavy rain plagued both armies as they withdrew from their Dallas-New Hope-Pickett’s Mill lines during the first weeks of June 1864. Forced to return to the Western and Atlantic Railroad to supply his men, Sherman concentrated his forces in the Acworth-Big Shanty region. The lack of roads and the impassable conditions of the ones that existed prevented Sherman from continuing his strategy of moving around Johnston’s flanks in order to pry him from his strong defensive positions. A more direct approach to Atlanta would be needed. Johnston, having no choice but to shadow Sherman’s movements, established a new line south of Acworth. Taking advantage of several prominent heights in the area, Johnston’s line ran north from Lost Mountain to Gilgal Church, turned east at Pine Mountain, and extended past Brush Mountain to the Western and Atlantic Railroad. This line enabled Johnston to protect both his communications and supply lines as well as the approaches to Marietta. Taking advantage of the wild and broken terrain occupied by his army, Johnston turned the ridges and hills into an extended fortress of earthworks, rifle pits, and artillery firing positions that dominated all avenues of approach across his front. Reinforced by the arrival of Major General Francis Blair’s XVII Corps of McPherson’s Army of the Tennessee, Sherman began his advance to Marietta on June 10, 1864. McPherson, on the left, moved along the railroad toward Marietta.
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 32, Issue 26 Virginia Register of Regulations August 22, 2016 3443 PUBLICATION SCHEDULE and DEADLINES
    VOL. 32 ISS. 26 PUBLISHED EVERY OTHER WEEK BY THE VIRGINIA CODE COMMISSION AUGUST 22, 2016 VOL TABLE OF CONTENTS Register Information Page ......................................................................................................................................... 3443 Publication Schedule and Deadlines ....................................................................................................................... 3444 Regulations ....................................................................................................................................................................... 3445 1VAC30-105. Regulations Banning Concealed Firearms in Offices Owned or Occupied by Executive Branch Agencies (Proposed) ............................................................................................................................. 3445 2VAC5-685. Regulations Governing Pesticide Applicator Certification under Authority of Virginia Pesticide Control Act (Final) ............................................................................................................................... 3448 6VAC20-230. Regulations Relating to Special Conservator of the Peace (Final) ................................................................. 3455 8VAC20-440. Regulations Governing the Employment of Professional Personnel (Proposed) ............................................ 3457 8VAC20-441. Regulations Governing the Employment of Professional Personnel (Proposed) ............................................ 3457 9VAC25-260.
    [Show full text]
  • Structures of Coastal Resilience Phase 1 Context, Site, and Vulnerability Analysis February 2014
    Structures of Coastal Resilience Phase 1 Context, Site, and Vulnerability Analysis February 2014 Structures of Coastal Resilience Phase 1 Context, Site, and Vulnerability Analysis February 2014 Princeton University School of Architecture Andlinger Center for Energy and the Environment Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs Harvard University Graduate School of Design City College of New York Spitzer School of Architecture University of Pennsylvania School of Design Table of Contents 6.0 Ocean State: Research and Site Characterization, 30 Greater Narragansett Bay, Rhode Island 6.1 Introduction 31 6.2 Methodology 43 6.3 Areas of Interest 48 Executive Summary vii-xxx 6.4 Vision 57 6.5 References 60 1.0 Introduction to Structures of Coastal Resilience 2 1.1 Background Context 3 7.0 Shifting Sands: Sedimentary Cycles for Jamaica Bay, New York 62 1.2 The Structures of Coastal Resilience (SCR) Project 5 7.1 Introduction and Purpose 63 1.3 References 8 7.2 Context 65 7.3 Storm Risk Reduction at Jamaica Bay, 1964-2014 75 2.0 Hurricane Storm Surge Risk Assessment for Structures of 10 7.4 Post-Sandy Case Studies 81 Coastal Resilience 7.5 Bathymetric / Topographic Merged Model 83 2.1 Objectives 10 7.6 Jamaica Bay Morphology 85 2.2 Methodology 10 7.7 Jurisdictional Dynamics 93 2.3 References 13 7.8 Vulnerability and Risk 97 3.0 Geographic Information Systems (GIS) Modeling For Structures 16 7.9 Methodology 105 of Coastal Resilience 7.10 Strategic Approaches for Storm Risk Reduction
    [Show full text]
  • Secbetaby of the Tbeasuby
    RECEIPTS A. ND DISBURSEMENTS. LETTER FROM THE SECBETABY OF THE TBEASUBY TRANSMITTING A Combined Statement of the Receipts and Disbursements of the Government for the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 1910. DEcEMBER 5, 1910.— Referred to the Committee on Appropriations and ordered to be printed. TREASURY DEPARTMENT OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY, Washington, D. C, December 5', 1910. To the SPEAKER oF THE HQUsE oF REPREsENTATIvEs. SIR: In compliance with the requirements of section 15 of an act entitled "An Act making appropriations for the legislative, executive, and judicial expenses of the Government for the fiscal year ending June 30, ]895, and for other purposes, " approved July' 3l, 1894 (28 Stat. , p. 210), I have the honor to transmit herewith a combined statement of the receipts and disbursements of the Government for the fiscal year ended June 30, 1910. Respectfully, FRANKLIN MACVEAGH, Secretary. COMBINED )YATEXlEXT OF THE RECEIPTS AND DISBURSEMENTS OF FOII THE FI~SCAL CHEAP ENDED JI,'IAE l30, 1NO. TREASURY DEPARTMENT, DiviSION OF BOOKKEEPING AND WARRANTS. SIR: I have the honor to submit herewith detailed statements of the receipts and disburse- ments of the Governmer;t for the fiscal year ended tune 30, 1910, as follows: Ordinary receipts derived by the Goveriirnent from customs, internal revenue including corporation tax, and sales of public lands in each district and State, and from various miscellaneous sources, $675, 511,715. 02; and public debt receipts, $31,674, 292. 50. Total receipts, $707, 186, 007.52. Ordinary disburse- ments, $659, 705, 391.08, which includes $8, 495, 612.87 grants from the Treasury for deficiencies in the postal revenues; disbursements for the Panama Canal, $33, 911,673.
    [Show full text]
  • Georgia Cobb Marietta
    Form 10-306 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR (Oct. 1972) NATIONAL PARK SERVICE Georgia NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES Cobb INVENTORY - NOMINATION FORM FOR NPS USE ONLY FOR FEDERAL PROPERTIES ENTRY DATE (Type all entries - complete applicable sections) COMMON: _JVr ~~ " ~ • : - Kennesaw Mountain National:Battlefield Park AND/OR HISTORIC: STREET AND NUMBER: P. O. : BOK 1167 On western edge of Marietta, GA^just .of£ US CITY OR TOWN: CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT: Marietta 7th STATE: COUNTY: , CODE Georgia : 137: . Cobb 067 ACCESSIBLE OWNERSHIP STATUS TO THE PUBLIC District | | Building L7Q Public Public Acquisition: Occupied Yes: Site' Q Structure L~3 Private Q In Process Unoccupied Qtl Restricted Q Object C] Both Q Being Considered Preservation work | | Unrestricted- in progress PRESENT USE (Check One or More as Appropriate) Q Agricultural [_J Government | | Transportation Comments t - [~~1 Commercial | | Industrial Q Private Residence Other fSpec/fy; [ ] Educational [^Military Q Religious | 1 Entertainment [~~| Museum I | Scientific Ui IU National Park ^Service, Kenne'saw Mountain National. Battlefield Park REGIONAL HEADQUARTERS: (I! applicable) STREET AMD NUMBER: Southeast Region Cl TY OR TOWN: Atlanta COURTHOUSE, REGISTRY OF DEEDS. ETC: Cobb County Courthouse STREET AND NUMBER: 177 Washington Avenue, N. ; E CITY_OR TOWN: Marietta TITLE OF SURVEY: None DATE OF SURVEY: DEPOSITORY FOR SURVEY RECORDS: STREET AND NUMBER: CITY OR TOWN: (Check One) f~l Excellent Stl Good Q Fair I | Deteriorated [ | Ruin* Q Unexpoted CONDITION (Check One) (Check One) (2Q Altered Q Unaltered Q Moved (X) Original Site DESCRIBE THE PRESENT AND ORIGINAL (it known) PHYSICAL APPEARANCE Kennesaw Mountain is an erosional granitic hornblende remnant located in the upper Georgia Piedmont.
    [Show full text]
  • 5/2/2017 Coverage
    Hotline: Voice of the Naturalist Date: 5/2/2017 Coverage: MD/DC/VA/central and southern DE/WV panhandle Reports, comments and questions: [email protected] Compiler: Gerry Hawkins Sponsor: Audubon Naturalist Society of the Central Atlantic States (independent of NAS) Transcriber: Steve Cordle Please consider joining ANS, especially if you are a regular user of the Voice of the Naturalist (Senior $35; Individual $50; Family $65; Nature Steward $100; Audubon Advocate $200). The membership number is 301-652-9188, option 12; the address is 8940 Jones Mill Road, Chevy Chase, MD 20815; and the web site is http://www.anshome.org/. This is the Voice of the Naturalist, a service of the Audubon Naturalist Society. This report covers the week starting Tuesday, April 25 and was completed on Tuesday, May 2 at 5:45 a.m. Information on noteworthy birds is presented below in taxonomic order, as set forth in the American Ornithologists’ Union Checklist for North and Middle American birds, as revised through the 57th Supplement (July 2016). The top bird this week was RUFF in DE and MD. Other birds of interest this week included SNOW and CACKLING GEESE, GREATER SCAUP, SURF, WHITE-WINGED and BLACK SCOTERS, LONG-TAILED DUCK, TRUMPETER SWAN, NORTHERN BOBWHITE, RED-NECKED GREBE, BLACK-BILLED CUCKOO, COMMON GALLINULE, SANDHILL CRANE, BLACK-BELLIED PLOVER, STILT and WHITE-RUMPED SANDPIPERS, WILSON’S PHALAROPE, PARASITIC and LONG-TAILED JAEGERS, GULL-BILLED TERN, ANHINGA, AMERICAN WHITE PELICAN, AMERICAN and LEAST BITTERNS, TRICOLORED HERON, WHITE and GLOSSY IBIS, MISSISSIPPI KITE, LOGGERHEAD and NORTHERN SHRIKES, SEDGE WREN, SWAINSON’S, MOURNING, CERULEAN and CANADA WARBLERS, CLAY-COLORED and LINCOLN’S SPARROWS, DICKCISSEL and BOBOLINK.
    [Show full text]
  • Class G Tables of Geographic Cutter Numbers: Maps -- by Region Or
    G3862 SOUTHERN STATES. REGIONS, NATURAL G3862 FEATURES, ETC. .C55 Clayton Aquifer .C6 Coasts .E8 Eutaw Aquifer .G8 Gulf Intracoastal Waterway .L6 Louisville and Nashville Railroad 525 G3867 SOUTHEASTERN STATES. REGIONS, NATURAL G3867 FEATURES, ETC. .C5 Chattahoochee River .C8 Cumberland Gap National Historical Park .C85 Cumberland Mountains .F55 Floridan Aquifer .G8 Gulf Islands National Seashore .H5 Hiwassee River .J4 Jefferson National Forest .L5 Little Tennessee River .O8 Overmountain Victory National Historic Trail 526 G3872 SOUTHEAST ATLANTIC STATES. REGIONS, G3872 NATURAL FEATURES, ETC. .B6 Blue Ridge Mountains .C5 Chattooga River .C52 Chattooga River [wild & scenic river] .C6 Coasts .E4 Ellicott Rock Wilderness Area .N4 New River .S3 Sandhills 527 G3882 VIRGINIA. REGIONS, NATURAL FEATURES, ETC. G3882 .A3 Accotink, Lake .A43 Alexanders Island .A44 Alexandria Canal .A46 Amelia Wildlife Management Area .A5 Anna, Lake .A62 Appomattox River .A64 Arlington Boulevard .A66 Arlington Estate .A68 Arlington House, the Robert E. Lee Memorial .A7 Arlington National Cemetery .A8 Ash-Lawn Highland .A85 Assawoman Island .A89 Asylum Creek .B3 Back Bay [VA & NC] .B33 Back Bay National Wildlife Refuge .B35 Baker Island .B37 Barbours Creek Wilderness .B38 Barboursville Basin [geologic basin] .B39 Barcroft, Lake .B395 Battery Cove .B4 Beach Creek .B43 Bear Creek Lake State Park .B44 Beech Forest .B454 Belle Isle [Lancaster County] .B455 Belle Isle [Richmond] .B458 Berkeley Island .B46 Berkeley Plantation .B53 Big Bethel Reservoir .B542 Big Island [Amherst County] .B543 Big Island [Bedford County] .B544 Big Island [Fluvanna County] .B545 Big Island [Gloucester County] .B547 Big Island [New Kent County] .B548 Big Island [Virginia Beach] .B55 Blackwater River .B56 Bluestone River [VA & WV] .B57 Bolling Island .B6 Booker T.
    [Show full text]
  • Phoebus Master Plan
    phoebus master plan: Hampton, Virginia urban design associates adopted by city council on august 15, 2007 amended by city council on march 13, 2013 PARTNERSHIP FOR A CITY COUNCIL PLANNING COMMISSION A special thanks to the residents Phoebus Master Plan NEW PHOEBUS of the Phoebus neighborhood who Molly Joseph Ward Gregory Williams gave their time, input, and energy Faith Jones Mayor Chairman to this effort. President PREPARED FOR George E. Wallace Gaynette LaRue City of Hampton, Virginia Ronnie Staton Vice-Mayor Vice-Chairman Vice-President FUNDED BY W. H. “Billy” Hobbs, Jr. Mary B. Bunting City of Hampton, Virginia Trudy Kearney Will J. Moffett City Manager/Commissioner Secretary Chris Osby Snead Carlton M. Campbell, Sr. urban 2013 design associates Christopher G. Stuart © CONSULTANT TEAM Dennis Smith Commissioner Donnie R. Tuck Urban Design Associates Treasurer HR&A Advisors, Inc. Andre McCloud Zimmerman/Volk Associates, Inc. Anne Donovan Commissioner Economic Development Sasaki Associates, Inc. Chris Osby Snead Dutton & Associates, LLC Laura Sandford Council Member/Commissioner Marketing James A. Young Colleen Walker Commissioner Membership Alison Schmidt Security Lisa Adkins Regatta Ed Elzarian Chris Jacobson Sally Lazorchak John Lowe Terrie Viars Keachia Witherspoon phoebus master plan: hampton, virginia | march 2013 | urban design associates acknowledgements Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 PROCESS & ANALYSIS 7 RESIDENTIAL MARKET STUDY 12 COMMERCIAL MARKET STUDY 13 IMPACT OF THE ‘NEW’ FORT MONROE 15 2013 urban 2013 design associates
    [Show full text]
  • Fort Monroe National Historic Landmark District
    Fort Monroe national historic landmark district Fort Monroe was designated a NHL in 1960 and was listed on the National Register of Historic Places in 1966. In the 1970s, the boundary of the NHL was defined as the entire area of Fort Monroe bound by the seawall. 1C 1C.1 Historic District Boundaries . 1C.3 1C.2 Inventory . 1C.3 1C.3 Historic Landscapes . 1C.5 1C.4 Historic Viewsheds . 1C.7 1C.5 Transportation Networks . 1C.9 1C.6 Archaeology . 1C.11 FORT MONROE HISTORIC PRESERVATION MANUAL AND DESIGN STANDARDS FORT MONROE NHL DISTRICT 1C.1 FORT MONROE NATIONAL HISTORIC LANDMARK DISTRICT 1975 NATIONAL HISTORIC DISTRICT BOUNDARY HISTORIC DISTRICT BOUNDARY FOR REUSE PLANNING PURPOSES HISTORIC DISTRICT BOUNDARY 1C.2 FORT MONROE NATIONAL HISTORIC LANDMARK DISTRICT 1C.1 HISTORIC DISTRICT BOUNDARIES Fort Monroe was designated a National Historic Landmark (NHL) in 1960 . The Fort Monroe NHL District documentation prepared in 1975 describes the boundaries of the historic district verbally as “…all that land on Point Comfort enclosed by its sea wall ”. The accompanying map defined the area with a paral- lelogram that encompassed the entire peninsula to where the sea wall ends near the northern limit of the fort, just below Dog Beach . It also included a portion of Phoebus and almost all of Mill Creek because of the regular polygon drawn to define the district . Phoebus and Mill Creek were not included in the text of the nomination’s written description of the fort . Currently, it is generally accepted that the boundary of the Fort Monroe NHL Quarters 1 District is roughly the shoreline of Old Point Comfort along Mill Creek to the north, Hampton Roads to the west and south, and the eastern edge of the district follows the sea wall along the Chesapeake Bay to the point where it ends and then the boundary crosses the peninsula to reconnect to Mill Creek .
    [Show full text]
  • The Irony of Emancipation in the Civil War South Clark Scott Nesbit
    The Irony of Emancipation in the Civil War South Clark Scott Nesbit, Jr. Richmond, Virginia B.A., Swarthmore College, 2001 M.A., University of Virginia, 2005 A Dissertation presented to the Graduate Faculty of the University of Virginia in Candidacy for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Corcoran Department of History University of Virginia December, 2013 2 © Clark Scott Nesbit, Jr., 2013 3 ABSTRACT Nearly everyone in the Civil War South had opportunity to feel the irony of emancipation. This irony arose from the wartime difference between ending slavery as a regime and freeing slaves, as individuals. This dissertation explores the ways in which white southerners sacrificed, or refused to sacrifice, their interest in the enslavement of particular southern blacks for the sake of a regime that would safeguard slavery. It argues that African Americans at times sought their own freedom even if it meant aiding the Confederate regime, and at other times sought to avoid warzones even if it meant remaining legally enslaved. It argues that the Union’s war to defeat the Confederacy was also a war waged against the Confederates’ main source of labor. Such a war meant, for most who became free in the Civil War, emancipation through displacement and integration into a new system for managing former slaves, the refugee camp/plantation/recruitment complex. For those who remained in the wake of Sherman’s marches and other U.S. raids, it meant living in a land with little food. 4 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank my dissertation committee, Ed Ayers, Gary Gallagher, Peter Onuf, and Maurie McInnis for their patience and thoughtful critiques.
    [Show full text]