Urban Environment Good Practice & Benchmarking Report
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Urban Environment Good Practice & Benchmarking Report European Green Capital Award 2017 Green cities - fit for life The authors of the Urban Environment Good Practice and Benchmarking Report for the 2017 EGCA Cycle are Ashley O’ Toole, Brenda McEvoy and Louise Campion, RPS Group, Ireland together with the contribution of the Expert Panel. RPS, an environmental and communications consultancy based in Ireland, is currently appointed as the European Green Capital Secretariat. The competition application process and the work of the expert panel and the jury are facilitated by the European Green Capital Secretariat. The secretariat also assists with PR activities related to the award scheme through the European Green Capital Award website, Facebook, Linked In and Twitter pages, and through various communication channels such as brochures and press releases. Urban Environment Good Practice & Benchmarking Report EGCA 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................ 1 1.1 EUROPEAN GREEN CAPITAL AWARD .................................................................................................... 1 1.2 THE INDICATOR AREAS ...................................................................................................................... 2 1.3 APPLICANT CITIES FOR 2017 AWARD .................................................................................................. 2 1.4 THE AIM OF THIS REPORT .................................................................................................................. 4 1.5 STRUCTURE AND APPROACH OF THIS REPORT ........................................................................................ 4 2 ENVIRONMENTAL GOOD PRACTICES ................................................................................. 5 2.1 CLIMATE CHANGE : MITIGATION & ADAPTATION .................................................................................... 5 2.2 LOCAL TRANSPORT .........................................................................................................................10 2.3 GREEN URBAN AREAS INCORPORATING SUSTAINABLE LAND USE .............................................................16 2.4 NATURE AND BIODIVERSITY .............................................................................................................21 2.5 AMBIENT AIR QUALITY ....................................................................................................................25 2.6 QUALITY OF ACOUSTIC ENVIRONMENT ...............................................................................................30 2.7 WASTE PRODUCTION AND MANAGEMENT ..........................................................................................37 2.8 WATER MANAGEMENT ...................................................................................................................41 2.9 WASTE WATER MANAGEMENT .......................................................................................................45 2.10 ECO -INNOVATION AND SUSTAINABLE EMPLOYMENT ............................................................................48 2.11 ENERGY PERFORMANCE .................................................................................................................52 2.12 INTEGRATED ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT ...................................................................................55 3 INTEGRATED GOOD PRACTICE EXAMPLES ....................................................................... 58 APPENDICES Appendix A Expert Panel Profiles MDR0763Rp0035F01 i Urban Environment Good Practice & Benchmarking Report EGCA 2017 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1-1 Map of 2017 Applicant Cities .................................................................................................... 3 Figure 2-1: CO2 Emissions per Capita (t CO2/inhabitant) in 2017 EGCA Applicant Cities ......................... 6 Figure 2-2: Thermal image of the entire municipal area, a sample neighbourhood and a sample building ....................................................................................................................................................... 7 Figure 2-3: The existing heating systems (brown); urban and regional expansion (blue) ......................... 8 Figure 2-4: Nijmegen district heating network .......................................................................................... 8 Figure 2-5: Biodiversity Meadows in Lisbon City........................................................................................ 9 Figure 2-6: Cycle path length per Applicant city inhabitant ..................................................................... 11 Figure 2-7: Proportion of Population Living within 300 m of an Hourly Public Transport Service .......... 12 Figure 2-8: Baixa Pombalina (downtown area) of Lisbon ........................................................................ 13 Figure 2-9: There’s great cycling in ‘s-Hertogenbosch! ............................................................................ 15 Figure 2-10: The percentage of green areas, blue areas, residential areas, industrial or economic areas, mixed areas, brownfields ......................................................................................................................... 16 Figure 2-11: Soil Sealing in inner city & overall city ................................................................................. 17 Figure 2-12: The Green Target ................................................................................................................. 18 Figure 2-13: Parque das Nações walkway ................................................................................................ 19 Figure 2-14: The dimension of the riverside renovation .......................................................................... 20 Figure 2-15: The Cascais Urban Ecological Structure ............................................................................... 22 Figure 2-16: Iberochondrostoma lusitanicum (boga-portuguesa) ........................................................... 23 Figure 2-17: Scarce large blue in Moerputten.......................................................................................... 23 Figure 2-18: Animals reintroduced include beaver, spadefoot toad, badger and stork .......................... 24 Figure 2-19: The Biobarometer developed by 's-Hertogenbosch ............................................................ 24 Figure 2-20: Max Number of days per year on which EU target value for ozone were exceeded (max running 8h mean) ..................................................................................................................................... 25 Figure 2-21: Annual Mean Air Concentrations of NO2, PM2.5 & PM10 .................................................. 26 Figure 2-22: Drive4Zero initiative ............................................................................................................. 27 Figure 2-23: Metropolrad Ruhr rental bike at Essen central station ....................................................... 28 Figure 2-24: Public local transport in Essen ............................................................................................. 29 Figure 2-25: % Population Exposure to Noise .......................................................................................... 31 Figure 2-26: Percentage of citizens living within 300m of quiet areas .................................................... 32 Figure 2-27: Extension of the A40 at Essen-Frillendorf with "porous asphalt" and new noise barriers .. 33 Figure 2-28: Opportunities for improving sound quality by road surface changes in ‘s-Hertogenbosch 34 Figure 2-29: Silent asphalt planned for all road surfaces in 2020 ............................................................ 34 Figure 2-30: The art-work “Lev!” (Live!) with sound installations at Umeå central train station Photo: Thomas Kieselbach (CC BY-NC 2.0)” ......................................................................................................... 35 Figure 2-31: Example of a typical unmanned noise monitoring station at an event & municipal website showing current noise levels .................................................................................................................... 36 Figure 2-32: Municipal and domestic waste generation/capita .............................................................. 37 Figure 2-33: Waste treatment in 2017 EGCA Applicant cities .................................................................. 38 Figure 2-34: Campaign Poster for “Look! Waste = Resource” ................................................................. 39 Figure 2-35: Waste flows in the city of Pec .............................................................................................. 40 Figure 2-36: Domestic Water Consumption in Applicant Cities ............................................................... 41 Figure 2-37: Water loss in pipelines, leakage management and network rehabilitation ........................ 42 Figure 2-38: Occurrences Table on www.aguasdoporto.pt website ....................................................... 43 Figure 2-39: Location of parametric probes installed at Middle Central Monitoring and Control Zone (ZMC) .......................................................................................................................................................