DOCSLIB.ORG

Connecting Practice Project Phase II Final Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Connecting Practice Project Phase II Final Report Connecting Practice Phase II Final Report 1 Connecting Practice Project Phase II Final Report TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction ....................................................................................................................................................................2 2. Summary of project activities ...................................................................................................................5 3. Good practices and lessons learned from project implementation ........ 8 4. Achievement of project objectives and goals for a potential third phase of Connecting Practice ......................................................21 ANNEXES: 1. Report of the meeting on EoH held in Finland ................................................................ 25 2. Report summarising all EoH activities .........................................................................................39 3. Fieldwork Report of Hortobágy (Hungary) ............................................................................ 52 4. Fieldwork Report of Maloti-Drakensberg (South Africa/Lesotho) ..........105 5. List of participants .............................................................................................................................................. 176 Lead Author: Leticia Leitão Additional Authors: Leanna Wigboldus, Gwenaëlle Bourdin and Tim Badman Cover photos: The mountains of Drakensberg A hut in Hortobágy ©2016 Letícia Leitão ©2016 Letícia Leitão Rock Art Nora Mitchell examining the landscape ©2017 Aron Mazel ©2016 Zsuzsa Tolnay Capturing images in Game Pass, South Africa Animals grazing in Hortobágy ©2016 Letícia Leitão ©2016 Gabor Szilagyi 2 Connecting Practice Project Phase II Final Report 1. Introduction Following the successful model of the first phase of the Connecting Practice Project, IUCN and ICOMOS are delighted to share the results of the second phase of the Project. There is growing evidence that the ‘divide’ often observed between natural and cultural heritage is slowly but steadily closing. When we launched the project in 2013, Connecting Practice was one of the few international initiatives addressing this challenge. Since then, we have seen similar efforts spread all over the world. The Nature-Culture Journey, a subtheme co-sponsored by IUCN and ICOMOS at the IUCN World Conservation Congress (held in Hawai’i, United States in September 2016), featured over forty sessions focused on sharing experiences from all over the world as to how professionals and organisations are working towards defining new methods for a connected approach between natural and cultural heritage. Later this year, the Scientific Symposium that will take place during the 19th ICOMOS General Assembly, to be held in Delhi, India, in December, will also include a Culture-Nature Journey as one of its subthemes. This report presents the results achieved, lessons learned and the challenges encountered in implementing the second phase of the project, which again received enormous interest from the heritage community. ‘Connecting Practice’ has become almost a brand in its own right, raising expectations of what could be achieved, but also posing the challenge of what it is possible to deliver. It has become a platform for innovation and the testing of new ideas, which can be used and sustained as a catalyst for change in other areas of the World Heritage system. IUCN and ICOMOS are very grateful for The Christensen Fund’s continuous support, which has enabled the implementation of the key activities of the project. We would also like to thank the Swiss Federal Office for the Environment (FOEN) for providing additional financial and technical resources at crucial moments of the project, and the significant in-kind support to the project through the efforts of site managers and stakeholders in Switzerland, Finland, South Africa, Lesotho and Hungary who participated so actively in the project activities, and whose work is the foundation of the results in this report. 3 Connecting Practice Project Phase II Final Report 1.1 Overview of the Connecting Practice Project and objectives of the second phase The Connecting Practice project aims to explore, learn and create new methods of recognition and support for the interconnected character of the natural, cultural and social value of highly significant land and seascapes and affiliated biocultural practices. The project is a joint initiative between IUCN (the International Union for Conservation of Nature) and ICOMOS (International Council on Monuments and Sites), providing the opportunity for influencing a shift in conceptual and practical arrangements for the consideration of culture and nature within the implementation of the World Heritage Convention. Following the successful model of the first phase of Connecting Practice, this second phase translated lessons learned into practical interventions by: a. exploring, defining and adapting management effectiveness methodologies that apply to both cultural and natural sites and recognize the interconnected biocultural character of their natural, cultural and social values; and b. strengthening policy frameworks and management arrangements for the protection of highly significant landscapes and seascapes that will achieve a more genuinely integrated consideration of natural and cultural heritage. At the same time, by influencing a larger discussion and collaboration of IUCN, ICOMOS and a range of partners – in particular via joint activities and presentations in international forums – the project helped raise awareness that natural and cultural heritage are closely interconnected in most landscapes and seascapes, and that effective and lasting conservation of such places depends on better integration of philosophies and procedures regarding their governance and management. Rock art Examining the property’s boundaries Herding sheep ©2017 Aron Mazel ©2016 Zsuzsa Tolnay ©2016 Letícia Leitão 4 Connecting Practice Project Phase II Final Report 1.2 How lessons learned from the first phase influenced the project design of the second phase In the final report of the first phase of the project, IUCN and ICOMOS noted three areas where work could be done differently if the project were to continue: first, to have more time and resources to prepare for the fieldwork; second, to have longer site visits and planning timelines; and third, to provide more support to the State Party partners involved in the work, and over a longer period of time to ensure that the work has tangible benefit to the sites themselves. Lessons learned in relation to these areas deeply influenced how the second phase of the project was designed. Instead of using three case studies, as was the case in the first phase of the project, IUCN and ICOMOS decided to work with only two case studies in the second phase to allow more direct Discussions in the field, Hortobágy ©2016 Zsuzsa Tolnay Hortobágy landscape Drakensberg mountains ©2016 Goran Gugic ©2016 Letícia Leitão Meeting with stakeholders, Lesotho involvement with the selected sites, permitting two fieldwork visits per ©2017 Aron Mazel site. The case studies selected were the Hortobágy National Park – the Puszta (Hungary), and the Maloti-Drakensburg Park (South Africa/Lesotho). In addition, IUCN and ICOMOS sought to provide more support to the hosting countries in order to ensure that fieldwork could be of tangible benefit to the sites themselves instead of only being useful for the ‘take-away’ learning outcomes. Towards this goal, site managers of the case studies identified and selected a management challenge to be explored in each of the fieldwork visits, which was then included as part of the Terms of Reference for the visits. 5 Connecting Practice Project Phase II Final Report IUCN and ICOMOS also aimed to translate any conceptual shifts resulting from the project into practical arrangements that could result in more effective conservation outcomes. For this reason, the second phase of the project was designed around a strong management element, and its main objectives reflected this. Fieldwork remained as the key component of the project and, as in the first phase, was structured as a learning exercise. However, this time, in addition to gathering a better understanding of the interconnected character of the natural, cultural and social values of the properties used as case studies, IUCN and ICOMOS explored how such an understanding could help strengthen policy frameworks and management arrangements. IUCN and ICOMOS also confirmed the need for practical strategies in order to deliver an interconnected approach to natural and cultural heritage within the implementation of the World Heritage Convention. This would include adapting existing tools and guidance that currently promote different approaches to natural and cultural heritage, and encouraging a common approach to all World Heritage properties. While developing a single resource manual for management of World Heritage properties remains a long-term goal, IUCN and ICOMOS decided to first focus on adapting existing management effectiveness methodologies, in particular the Enhancing Our Heritage (EpH) Toolkit (UNESCO, 2008). Management effectiveness is a well- established discipline in nature conservation, but the cultural heritage field has yet to adopt a standardised practice or framework for carrying out similar assessments. For years, this has been considered one of the key priorities for joint work. Therefore, taking advantage of Connecting
Load more

Recommended publications
  • PASTORALISM and CONFLICT: TOOLS for PREVENTION and RESPONSE in the SUDANO-SAHEL Partnership for Stability and Security in the Sudano-Sahel
    PASTORALISM AND CONFLICT: TOOLS FOR PREVENTION AND RESPONSE IN THE SUDANO-SAHEL Partnership for Stability and Security in the Sudano-Sahel This report was produced in collaboration with the U.S. State Department, Bureau of Conflict and Stabilization Operations (CSO), as part of the project Partnership for Stability and Security in the Sudano-Sahel (P4SS). The goal of this project is to inform stabilization and development efforts in communities across the Sudano-Sahel affected by cross-border farmer-herder conflict by identifying proven, data-informed methods of conflict transformation. AUTHORS Mike Jobbins, Search for Common Ground Andrew McDonnell, Search for Common Ground This report was made possible by the support of the U.S. Department of State, Bureau of Conflict and Stabilization Operations (CSO). The views expressed in the report are those of the authors alone and do not represent the institutional position of the U.S. Government, or the Search for Common Ground. © 2021 Search for Common Ground This publication may be reproduced in whole or in part and in any form without permission from Search for Common Ground, provided the reproduction includes this Copyright notice and the Disclaimer below. No use of this publication may be made for resale or for any other commercial purpose whatsoever without prior permission in writing from Search for Common Ground. This publication should be cited as follows: Jobbins, Mike and Andrew McDonnell. (2021). Pastoralism and Conflict: Tools for Prevention and Response in the Sudano- Sahel, 1st ed. Washington DC: Search for Common Ground. Cover photo credit: Alhaji Musa. 2 | Pastoralism and Conflict: Tools for Prevention and Response Methodology and Development The findings and recommendations in this Toolkit were identified based on a meta-review of program evaluations and scholarly research in French and English, supplemented by a series of key informant interviews with program implementers.
    [Show full text]
  • Release the Kvarken a Study About Land Uplift Jacob Lundgren
    Release the Kvarken A study about land uplift Jacob Lundgren Magister Thesis, 15 hp Master's Programme in Human Geography with specialisation in Geographical Information Systems (GIS) 60 hp Spring 2019 Acknowledgement First and foremost I would like to thank Viljami Perheentupa from the Department of Geoinformatics and Cartography, Finnish Geospatial Research Institute FGI, National Land Survey of Finland. Without his help and the data that he provided this study would not have been possible. Secondly I would like to thank my supervisor Cenk Demiroglu for the help he provided to the thesis. I would also like to thank Anne and Madicken for their emotional support throughout my thesis. Lastly I would like to thank my classmates and the teachers at the Master’s programme. Contents Acknowledgement ................................................................................................................................... 2 Abstract ................................................................................................................................................... 4 1. Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 1 2. Aim and research questions ............................................................................................................ 3 3. Previous studies ............................................................................................................................... 4 Land uplift .......................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Världsarvslistan
    http://wimnell.com/omr91b.pdf • Tipasa • Kasbah of Algiers Världsarvslistan Andorra http://whc.unesco.org/en/list/ • Madriu-Perafita-Claror Valley Argentina The World Heritage List includes 936 properties forming part of the • Los Glaciares # cultural and natural heritage which the World Heritage Committee • Jesuit Missions of the Guaranis: San Ignacio Mini, Santa Ana, considers as having outstanding universal value. Nuestra Señora de Loreto and Santa Maria Mayor (Argentina), Ruins of Sao Miguel das Missoes (Brazil) * These include 725 cultural , 183 natural and 28 mixed properties in • Iguazu National Park 153 States Parties. As of November 2011, 188 States Parties have • Cueva de las Manos, Río Pinturas ratified the World Heritage Convention. • Península Valdés • Ischigualasto / Talampaya Natural Parks Afghanistan • Jesuit Block and Estancias of Córdoba • Quebrada de Humahuaca • Minaret and Archaeological Remains of Jam Armenia • Cultural Landscape and Archaeological Remains of the Bamiyan Valley • Monasteries of Haghpat and Sanahin Albania • Cathedral and Churches of Echmiatsin and the Archaeological Site of Zvartnots • Butrint • Monastery of Geghard and the Upper Azat Valley • Historic Centres of Berat and Gjirokastra Australia Algeria • Great Barrier Reef • Al Qal'a of Beni Hammad • Kakadu National Park • Djémila • Willandra Lakes Region • M'Zab Valley • Lord Howe Island Group • Tassili n'Ajjer # • Tasmanian Wilderness • Timgad • Gondwana Rainforests of Australia 1 • Uluru-Kata Tjuta National Park 2 • Qal’at al-Bahrain – Ancient Harbour
    [Show full text]
  • Architecture in Kvarken
    ARCHITECT URE I N K V A R K E N – TWO COUNTRIES - A WORLD OF CONTRAST Get to know the modern cities as well as the old wooden towns in Kvarken. During an architecture tour, you will get to know Kvarken from an architectural perspective, its history, as well as stories about people who lived and live along the coasts of the Gulf of Bothnia. Höga Kusten Umeå Vaasa Seinäjoki Kristinestad Pietarsaari/Jakobstad Kokkola Höga Kusten and Örnsköldsvik Örnsköldsvik, even called Ö-vik, is part of the High Coast and its fantastic nature. Naturum Höga Kusten - is designed by White Architects. Located in the shadow of the mighty Skuleberget. Naturum Höga kusten, is an attention- grabbing building inspired by the nature that surrounds it. Interesting geometric patterns and angular displacements give the building rich and varied expression. It is precisely the rough and anything but 90-degree feeling that characterizes nature on the High Coast. The High Coast is characterized by odd angles and variation in rhythm, scale and color. The glazed long side represents the ice. The inner concrete wall symbolizes the mountain. ArkNat – is a combination of architecture and nature. Architect students from all over Scandinavia were invited to create unique “art” that reminds of typical wind shelters in the nature. As result you will find nine fantastic creations, places to rest or to have a picknick, located along the 128 km long High coast Trail. Ting 1 – is residential building in Örnsköldsvik Ting 1 is designed by Gert Wingårdh, who was inspired by Bengt Lindström's art.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Concept Paper: World Heritage Site Manager Workshop, Denmark 21 24 April 2009 Enhancing Our Heritage Toolkit
    Draft Concept Paper: World Heritage Site Manager Workshop, Denmark 21 24 April 2009 Enhancing Our Heritage Toolkit The Heritage Agency of Denmark has generously decided to host a workshop on the Enhancing Our Heritage Toolkit (EoH). Representatives from all the Nordic sites are invited to attend. Nordic World Heritage Foundation will in cooperation with the Danish authorities organize this workshop in April 2009. The workshop is a result of the recommendations from the Periodic Reporting process. 1. Background and objectives The European Periodic Report was submitted to the World Heritage Committee at its 30th meeting in Vilnius 2006. The Nordic Baltic sub-regional report, annexed to the regional report, identifies a number of challenges for the implementation of the World Heritage Convention in the sub-region. Periodic Reporting is widely recognised as an important tool to strengthen and maintain the integrity and credibility of the World Heritage concept. The Periodic Reporting process has so far been successful in developing international cooperation and in providing an account of the status of World Heritage sites. This workshop follows the recommendations from the meeting between the Nordic and Baltic States Parties in 2007 (see Annex I Recommendations from the meeting on Periodic Reporting, Helsinki 3-4 May 2007 no: 6, 7 & 12). The World Heritage Committee will examine the Periodic Reporting follow-up activities for the European region at its 34th session in 2010. The Enhancing Our Heritage Toolkit contains twelve practical tools. Although it has been developed with a focus on natural properties, the initiative also has potential value as a tool to assist site managers of cultural properties.
    [Show full text]
  • Suomenlinnan Hoitosuunnitelma
    Hoitosuunnitelma. Suomenlinna – Unescon maailmanperintökohde Management Plan. Fortress of Suomenlinna – Unesco World Heritage Site Hoitosuunnitelma. Suomenlinna – Unescon maailmanperintökohde Hoitosuunnitelma Suomenlinna – Unescon maailmanperintökohde suomenlinnan hoitokunta the governing body of suomenlinna Management Plan Suomenlinna C 40, FI–00190 Helsinki, Finland ISBN 978-952-7064-00-9 Fortress of Suomenlinna – Unesco World Heritage Site 2014 Hoitosuunnitelma. Suomenlinna – Unescon maailmanperintökohde. Management Plan. Fortress of Suomenlinna – Unesco World Heritage Site © Suomenlinnan hoitokunta 2014 ISBN 978-952-7064-00-9 Toimittanut / Edited by Iina Valkeisenmäki unescon maailmanperintötunnus tunnukset: tunnukset: 1 Sisältö Contents Johdanto 5 Introduction 5 Taustaa 6 Background 7 Suomenlinna 9 Suomenlinna fortress, 9 maailmanperintökohteena a World Heritage Site Suomenlinna, erityislaatuinen merilinnoitus 10 A unique sea fortress 10 Suomenlinnan maailmanperintöarvot 10 Suomenlinna’s Outstanding Universal Values 11 Eheys ja autenttisuus 12 Integrity and authenticity 12 Suojelu, hoito, hallinto ja resurssit 13 Conservation, management and resources 14 Suomenlinnan suoja-alue 16 Suomenlinna Buffer Zone 17 Kansalliset arvot 17 National values 18 Uhat 19 Threats 20 Toimijoiden ja osallisten esittely 22 Actors and Stakeholders 22 Suomenlinnan hoitokunta 23 The Governing Body of Suomenlinna 23 Suomenlinnan hoidosta vastaa yksi taho 24 One responsible organisation 24 Kaupungin ja valtion toimijat 25 Central and local government organisations
    [Show full text]
  • Preparing World Heritage Nominations (First Edition, 2010) Published in February 2011 by the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization
    FIRST EDITION, 2010 PREPARING WORLD HERITAGE Resource Manual NOMINATIONS World Heritage World Heritage Convention For more information contact: UNESCO World Heritage Centre 7, place de Fontenoy 75352 Paris 07 SP France Tel: 33 (0)1 45 68 18 76 Fax: 33 (0)1 45 68 55 70 E-mail: [email protected] World Heritage http://whc.unesco.org Convention international council on monuments and sites Original Title: Preparing World Heritage Nominations (First Edition, 2010) Published in February 2011 by the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. The designations employed and the presentation of material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of UNESCO, ICCROM, ICOMOS and IUCN concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The UNESCO World Heritage Centre, ICCROM, ICOMOS, IUCN and other participating organizations disclaim any errors or omissions in the translation of this manual from the original version in English, or from primary errors in any of the data interpreted within it. This manual has taken as a reference the most recent version of the Operational Guidelines for the Implementation of the World Heritage Convention (2008). Currently, the Operational Guidelines are being revised and will be approved by the World Heritage Committee at its 35th session in June 2011. An updated version of this manual will be published afterwards. Free non-profit use/reproduction of this
    [Show full text]
  • A Good Life for Allessays on Sustainability Celebrating 60 Years of Making Life Better
    Essays on Sustainability Celebrating 60 years of making Life Better of making Life on Sustainability Celebrating 60 years Essays All for A Good Life For a better world now and in the future For a world that sustains itself for generations to come, the A Good Life for All University of Gävle is an ambitious and development-oriented organization with a focus on sustainability now and in the future. Under the leadership of Dr. Maj-Britt Johanssen, the university is creating a sustainable community. is book commemorates her e orts in honour of her 60th birthday. e ten essays here show the wide variety of sustainability activities under her leadership, not limited to ecological issues, including science, social work, building design and construction, and World Heritage sites, along with a variety of other cutting-edge topics Essays on Sustainability Celebrating 60 years of making Life Better ISBN 978-91-7527-174-3 Arne Fagerström and Gary M. Cunningham, Editors 9 789175 271743 A Good Life for All Essays on Sustainability Celebrating 60 years of making Life Better Arne Fagerström and Gary M. Cunningham, Editors Funding generously and gratefully provided by A Good Life for All For a world that lasts longer, we are an ambitious and development-oriented organization with a focus on the future. We are working for a sustainable community development by conveying knowledge and provide solutions. It creates opportunities for people to participate Essays on Sustainability and contribute to a better environment. Along with our residents, we make a contribution towards a sustainable future by spreading knowledge about waste and the environment and Celebrating 60 years of making do our work in recycling business.
    [Show full text]
  • Livestock and Wolves: a Guide to Nonlethal Tools and Methods to Reduce Conflicts
    Livestock and Wolves A Guide to Nonlethal Tools and Methods to Reduce Conflicts SECOND EDITION DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE Defenders of Wildlife is a national, nonprofit membership organization dedicated to the protection of all native wild animals and plants in their natural communities. Acknowledgements Principal Author Suzanne Asha Stone Contributing Authors Erin Edge, Nina Fascione, Craig Miller, Charlotte Weaver Other Contributors Brian and Kathleen Bean, Stewart Breck, Ray Coppinger, Tom Gehring, Pete Haswell, Marco Musiani, Fernando Najera, Carter Niemeyer, Brad Purcell, Linda Thurston, Jesse Timberlake, Rick and Carol Williamson, Ian Whalan Editorial Team Kate Davies, Charlotte Weaver Designer Maureen Gregory Special thanks to the Park Foundation, Lava Lake Institute and Lava Lake Lamb; Blaine County Commission; Montana Department of Fish, Wildlife and Parks; Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife; Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife; U.S.D.A. National Wildlife Research Center; Natural Resources Conservation Service; Nez Perce Tribe; Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla; University of Calgary; Oregon State University; Washington State University; University of Washington; University of Montana; Central Michigan University; Animal Welfare Institute; Wolf Recovery Foundation; United Kingdom Wolf Conservation Trust; National Wolfwatchers Coalition; Toyota TogetherGreen; Idaho Golden Eagle Audubon; U.S.D.A. Wildlife Services; U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; and Yellowstone National Park. © 2016 Second Edition Defenders of Wildlife 1130 17th Street, NW Washington, D.C. 20036-4604 202.682.9400 www.defenders.org Cover photos: range rider © Louise Johns; sheep and fladry © Brad DeVries/Defenders of Wildlife; black angus cattle © Terrance Emerson/Adobe; wolf © Sandy Sisti Printed on 100% recycled paper, 60% post-consumer waste, processed chlorine-free.
    [Show full text]
  • A Sustainable Tourism Strategy for Suomenlinna
    A sustainable tourism strategy for Suomenlinna The governing body of Suomenlinna 2015 Contents UNESCO foreword ....................................................................................................................................................................4 A model destination for sustainable tourism ......................................................................................................... 5 Executive summary ..............................................................................................................................................................6 The strategic framework ....................................................................................................................................................8 COMMON HERITAGE Of HUMANITY ...............................................................................................................................10 Description of the site ................................................................................................................................................10 Guided by UNESCO ........................................................................................................................................................10 Suomenlinna as a World Heritage Site ............................................................................................................. 12 DESCRIPTION Of THE OPERATING ENVIRONMENT ....................................................................................................14
    [Show full text]
  • Sudan Country Study
    Pastoralism and Conservation in the Sudan Executive Summary Introduction On a global scale, Sudan perhaps ranks first in terms of pastoralists population size. About 66 per cent of Sudan is arid land, which is mainly pastoralists’ habitat. Pastoralism in the Sudan involves about 20 per cent of the population and accounts for almost 40 per cent of livestock wealth [Markakis, 1998: 41]. The livestock sector plays an important role in the economy of the Sudan, accounting for about 20 percent of the GDP, meeting the domestic demand for meat and about 70 percent of national milk requirements and contributing about 20 percent of the Sudan’s foreign exchange earnings. It is also a very significant source of employment for about 80 percent of the rural workforce. In the Sudan it is estimated that the total number of cattle multiplied 21 times between 1917 and 1977, camels 16 times, sheep 12 times and goats 8 times [Fouad Ibrahim, 1984, p.125 in Markakis, 1998: 42]. Their numbers are estimated to have doubled between 1965 and 1986. The rapid rate of animal population increase has been attributed to the introduction of veterinary services and the stimulation of the market. Two periods of exceptional rainfall (1919-1934 and 1950-1965) added momentum to this trend. In the early 1980s there were nearly three million heads of camels, over 20 million cattle, nearly 19 million sheep, and 14 million goats. Livestock estimates for the year 2005 are 38 million heads of cattle, 47 million sheep, 40 million goats and three million camels [Ministry of Animal Resources, 2006].
    [Show full text]
  • The State of Sudan's Biodiversity for Food and Agriculture
    COUNTRY REPORTS THE STATE OF SUDAN’S BIODIVERSITY FOR FOOD AND AGRICULTURE This country report has been prepared by the national authorities as a contribution to the FAO publication, The State of the World’s Biodiversity for Food and Agriculture. The report is being made available by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) as requested by the Commission on Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture. The information in this report has not been verified by FAO, and the content of this document is entirely the responsibility of the authors, and does not necessarily represent the views of FAO, or its Members. The designations employed and the presentation of material do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of FAO concerning legal or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers, whether or not these have been patented, does not imply that these have been endorsed by FAO in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. FOREWORD Sudan is a part to the FAO Commission on Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture, the only intergovernmental forum which deals with whole range of genetic resources for food and agriculture. The importance of the genetic resources for food and agriculture stems from the fact that it is building block of biodiversity. It is realized that biodiversity provides the basis for livelihood and sustainable social and economic development; and safe ecological safety and food security.
    [Show full text]