THE JULY REVOLUTION and the PROVINCIAL PRESS Although

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

THE JULY REVOLUTION and the PROVINCIAL PRESS Although APPENDIX A THE JULY REVOLUTION AND THE PROVINCIAL PRESS Although its indirect influences reached as far as Poland and Russia, the Revolution of 1830 has been aptly called "The Paris Revolution". Three days of combat and three more of political maneuvering in Paris had established the new regime as an accomplished fact before any major counterrevolution could have flared up in the provinces. It is of some importance, however, to record the reactions of smaller cities to the news of events in the capital, especially in those areas where political journalism had been active. In most of the provincial capitals, as well as in lesser towns, the National Guard was a more decisive agency of both revolution and order than it had been in Paris. Liberal newspaper editors in the provinces, victims of Polignac's judicial assaults, opposed the press edict in several cases by physical resistance. Some commanders in garrisoned towns were torn between their oaths to the King and the opposition of townspeople and even their own troops. A few prefects tried to assume dictatorial powers and drew the open hostility of citizens. News of the decrees and the Revolution arrived almost simultaneously within three days of the events in most parts of the nation. Reports came by private letters from Paris, as well as from daily dispatch riders who rode a general circuit of France; couriers visiting the same points on successive days. The telegraphe, or hill-to-hill semaphore system, was also employed. In the north and the regions surrounding Paris, the reception of the edicts caused wild disturbances and excitement, but little shedding of blood. In Rambouillet, of course, all was serene. The forest and the Chateau were held by the Royal Guard and the jleur-de-lys waved overhead. At Versailles, the citizens rose, crowds filled the streets, and the local garrison troops retired peacefully to their barracks. 1 Meudon was placed under the National Guard, whose commandant sent to Lafayette for instruc- 1 Joumal du Commerce, 30 July, 1830. APPENDICES 261 tions. 2 Tours experienced no great unrest. Royal troops stationed there· adopted the tricolor on August I, 3 while in Chartres. the National Guard assumed the direction of affairs. 4 Le Havre responded to the emergency with tremendous enthusiasm. The National Guard seized jurisdiction of the seaport and organized for a march into Paris. A great number of residents, joined by a crowd of celebrating American sailors on liberty, swelled the exodus to the capital. An atmosphere of great levity. probably with delays for refreshment, accompanied the journey of this delegation. 5 The populace of Rouen remained calm, but the Journal, the liberal newspaper, pledged Paris the aid of the city's 40,000 able-bodied men. The royalist city council voted to retain the Bourbon flag, but many citizens !lew the tricolor. When the news of the Paris victory reached them. the council members agreed to hoist the national flag, but they draped the royal !lag in mourning. 6 The textile city of Lille was closer to the Brussels revolution of 1830 than to that of Paris. When the decrees arrived. the two royal prosecutors of the city resigned rather than pursue indictments of editors who published in contravention of the press decree. Garrison troops fraternized with the people and there was little violence, although a colonel of Curassiers, who threatened to charge into a crowd of civilians, was nearly stoned to death. 7 In Calais, offices and workshops closed. The local general, commanding the port, polled his aides on the question of loyalty - they voted unanimously to join the revolution. 8 Normandy had been one of the most politically disturbed regions of France under Charles X. In Caen, the editor of the Pilote de Calvados watched the reports from Paris with pleasure. Since 1824. this paper had been especially friendly to the Duke of Orleans, because he had employed, as librarian of the Palais Royal, a local citizen who had been disgraced by Louis XVIII. The Pilote's motto: "Steer your boat with prudence", was taken from an opera about the revolt of Naples in 1647. During the recent elections, Caen had been under heavy royalist pressure, but had voted Left, in tune with the editorials of the Pilote. Two regiments had been dispatched to the city by Polignac, ostensibly to prevent arson activity, but the Minister Guernon-Ranville, a citizen of Caen, had in this case, protested the use of troops. On July 28, the Pilote printed the edicts without comment, and was 2 Ibid. 3 Le Moniteur, 2 August, 1830. 4 Ibid., 4 August, 1830. 5 Ibid., 5 August, 1830. 6 Ibid.; Journal du Commerce, 30 July, 1830. 7 Le Moniteur, 2, 3 August, 1830. 8 Ibid., 4 August, 1830. 262 APPENDICES not suppressed for publishing without authorization. On the thirtieth, a crowd of several hundred gathered in the Place Royale shouting, A bas Charles X! Some one daubed the following words on the statue of the Sun-King, Louis XIV: L'etat, c'est moil Revocation de !'edit de Nantes! Les Dragon­ nades!9 In the west, the proud cities of Nantes and Angers faced the July Revolution in different ways. In Nantes, the Prefect was baron de Vaussay, an extreme Ultra, while the Mayor was an honest, though reactionary, royalist, and the city council was composed, of Ultras. Military headquarters of the western division was located in Nantes under comte Despinois, another Ultra. The local opposition journal was the Ami de Ia Charte, whose editor had received a six month jail term and a 2000 franc fine only a few days before the July decrees were issued. His crime had been to print a republican testimonial and an anticlerical editorial. Public sentiment was not with the government because of this conviction and because of economic depression. In this city, the unemployment rate was 17 percent and the average laborer earned two francs for a twelve to fifteen hour working day,I 0 comparable to the worst wages in Paris. The edicts were first announced to a theatre audience in Nantes on the evening of July 28. An uprising spread from the theatre to the town and soon, sixteen persons had been arrested and several gendarmes wounded. On the thirtieth, the Mayor ordered all cafes and shops closed in the evening. A mob stole six hundred inferior muskets from an armorer and patrolled menacingly in the central district. One group of 150 men attacked the barracks of the Visitation and were surprised by 120 troops of the line. A terrible fight ensued: Of the demonstrators, ten were killed and thirty-nine wounded, while the army, in this sudden fight, lost six dead and thirteen injured. The city, which always had more than its share of slaughter, was frozen with horror. The heartbroken Prefect released all his prisoners and General Despinois left on a futile mission of Ultra honor to raise the peasants in the Vendee. 11 The Nantais martyrs were given an impressive funeral: Their revolution had been "won", but by a tragic blunder. It was revealed that the royal soldiers only fired on the insurgents because the commandant had assured them reinforcements were being sent from Rennes. 12 Nearby Angers, also a royalist stronghold, lived through the July Days in 9 Henri Prentout, "Caen en 1830", Revue d'Histoire Moderne, VI (1931), 114. 10 Giraud-Mangin, "Nantes in 1830 et les journees de Juillet", Revue d'Histoire Moderne, VI (1931), 459. 11 Ibid. 12 Le Moniteur, 4 August, 1830. APPENDICES 263 near-tranquillity, as contrasted with the bloody day of fighting in Nantes. When the edicts were read in Angers on the afternoon of Wednesday, the twenty-eighth, the Prefect immediately closed the office and press of the Journal de Maine et Loire, for its adherence to constitutional principles. For two days the restless people lived on sporadic rumors from Paris. On August I, the Mayor allowed the formation of the National Guard. The Ultra gendarme commander was seized by the mob but the order-conscious Guard took him into protective custoday. The Prefect at last fled and the Mayor set up a provisional government, while the nearby castle of Saumur was stocked with 1500 guns as a precaution against a new Chouannerie. 13 It was clear that, all over France, both the Ultras and Left had overestimated the possibility of peasant risings. The south and south-central regions received the revolution as a fait accompli since the July edicts were not disseminated there until several days after their issuance. There were, however, a few revolutionary episodes. Throughout Saturday, the great industrial and republican center of Lyon was under a revolutionary anarchy. The previous day, manufacturers had ordered a general lockout, following the example of nearby Grenoble. The National Guard of Lyon organized a force of 8000 armed men in a remarkably short time and the line troops and chasseurs, sent by the Prefect to quell the demonstrations, wisely surrendered to the Guard. 14 In France's second city, the National Guard successfully prevented violence from both Left and Right. The cities of Clermont-Ferrand, Toulouse, Limoges, and Avignon, were shaken only slightly by the eruption at Paris. In Limoges, the two largest porcelain manufacturers proclaimed the lockout and royal prosecutors refused to enforce the decrees against the press. 15 In Toulouse and Clermont, the National Guard moved so swiftly that the soldiers of the King were completely surprised and adopted the tricolor of their compatriots. 16 The A vignonese had suffered greatly in the "White Terror" of 1815, but their actions in 1830 bore no spirit of vengeance.
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...

19 pages remaining, click to load more.

Recommended publications
  • The Fan Affair and the Conquest of Algeria1
    The Fan Affair and the conquest of Algeria1 Michael Dudzik2 ABSTRACT The study analyses the domestic political background of the conflict that resulted in the French conquest of Algeria. The author begins at the turn of the 18th and 19th centuries when the Paris gov- ernment bought grain from Algerian merchants. Subsequent economic cooperation, including the provision and collection of loans, negatively affected mutual relations. Deteriorating relations were negatively affected by the appointment of Hussein Pasha as governor of Algeria in 1818, and they further worsened after a diplomatic insult against the French ambassador in April 1827. The article analyses developments in both countries, the gradual escalation of conflicts and their response in the European powers and presents the reasons that prompted the French government to intervene. KEYWORDS France, the conquest of Algeria, Charles X, Jules Prince de Polignac, 1830 INTRODUCTION The tense political and social climate in France at the end of the second decade of the 19th century reflected the citizens’ dissatisfaction with the regime of the re- turned Bourbons. King Charles X (1757–1836) promoted absolutism and restrictions on the press and relied primarily on the Catholic Church and the pre-revolution- ary nobility. Together with the Prime Minister, Prince Jules Auguste Marie de Poli- gnac (1780–1847), he tried to divert public attention from the negative response of extremely conservative domestic policy measures to foreign policy, and use the age- old dispute with Algeria, a vassal of the Ottoman Empire, to achieve easy victory and thus raise the prestige of the army and the regime. The study analyses Franco-Algerian economic and political relations after 1818 when Hussein Pasha became Algerian governor.
    [Show full text]
  • French Romantic Socialism and the Critique of Liberal Slave Emancipation Naomi J
    Santa Clara University Scholar Commons History College of Arts & Sciences 9-2013 Breaking the Ties: French Romantic Socialism and the Critique of Liberal Slave Emancipation Naomi J. Andrews Santa Clara University, nandrews@scu.edu Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarcommons.scu.edu/history Part of the European History Commons, and the Feminist, Gender, and Sexuality Studies Commons Recommended Citation Andrews, Naomi J. (2013). Breaking the Ties: French Romantic Socialism and the Critique of Liberal Slave Emancipation. The ourJ nal of Modern History, Vol. 85, No. 3 (September 2013) , pp. 489-527. Published by: The nivU ersity of Chicago Press. Article DOI: 10.1086/668500. Article Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/668500 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the College of Arts & Sciences at Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in History by an authorized administrator of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact rscroggin@scu.edu. Breaking the Ties: French Romantic Socialism and the Critique of Liberal Slave Emancipation* Naomi J. Andrews Santa Clara University What we especially call slavery is only the culminating and pivotal point where all of the suffering of society comes together. (Charles Dain, 1836) The principle of abolition is incontestable, but its application is difficult. (Louis Blanc, 1840) In 1846, the romantic socialist Désiré Laverdant observed that although Great Britain had rightly broken the ties binding masters and slaves, “in delivering the slave from the yoke, it has thrown him, poor brute, into isolation and abandonment. Liberal Europe thinks it has finished its work because it has divided everyone.”1 Freeing the slaves, he thus suggested, was only the beginning of emancipation.
    [Show full text]
  • The Parisian Catholic Press and the February 1848 Revolution M
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Dominican Scholar Dominican Scholar History | Faculty Scholarship History | Faculty Collections 2005 The Parisian Catholic Press and the February 1848 Revolution M. Patricia Dougherty Department of History, Dominican University of California, patricia.dougherty@dominican.edu Survey: Let us know how this paper benefits you. Recommended Citation Dougherty, M. Patricia, "The Parisian Catholic Press and the February 1848 Revolution" (2005). History | Faculty Scholarship. 2. https://scholar.dominican.edu/history-faculty-scholarship/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the History | Faculty Collections at Dominican Scholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in History | Faculty Scholarship by an authorized administrator of Dominican Scholar. For more information, please contact michael.pujals@dominican.edu. The Parisian Catholic Press and the February 1848 Revolution The spark that ignited the 1848 Revolution in France was the cancellation of a large protest demonstration which was to precede a 22 February political banquet in the XII arrondissement of Paris. The immediate issue was the right to hold meetings (the right of assembly), but the underlying issue was one of political power and reform. That this action led to a revolution which overthrew the Orleanist monarchy and instituted a republic surprised everyone. One might think that the Catholics in France who were by far and large royalist would bemoan the end of a monarchy B much as many had done when the 1830 Revolution replaced the Bourbon Charles X with the Orleanist Louis-Philippe. The Catholic periodicals which existed in 1848, however, tell another story about the reception of this mid-century revolution in France.
    [Show full text]
  • A. [Chaix D'est-Ange
    DICTIONNAIRE FAMEES FRANÇAISES AfoeSjÊNNES yt OU NOTABLES APARla fin du XIXe siècle TOME HUITIÈME / -ÉVREUX" f •> 4; BUS DE-LA BMÏQUE, k • ,J (f fi 9,idfïONNAIÏtE •' ' V<K ;i- - DES FAMILLES FRANÇAISES ANCIENNES OU NOTABLES A la fin du XW siécle IL A ÉTÉ TIRÉ DE CET OUVRAGE 200 e~emplaires seulement, naît mis dans le commerce. EVRBUX, IMPRIMERIE CH. H7lHISSHY, ('AVL HHRtSSBY, succr DICTIONNAIRE DES FAMEES FRANÇAISES Ti ÂtfeiÉNjï/ES OU NOTABLES a ~~l in du XIX" siècle Vf PAR C. d'e.-a.. TOME HUITIÈME BUS-CAS ÉVREUX IMPRIMERIE CHARLES HÉRISSEY PAUL HÉR1SSEY, SUCC' 4, RUE D« LA BANQUE, 4 "-' 1909 vr":> DICTIONNAIRE DES FAMILJ^ FRANÇAISES B BUS (Lefébure du). Voyez Leférure DU Bus. BUS (du), en Belgique. Armes d'or à une palme de sinople. -Armes concédées de nos jours au rameaudes seigneurs de Gisignies coupé au 1 d'or à une palme de sinople; au 2 écartelé A d'azur à un écu d'argenten abîme, accompagnéde quatre fleurs de lys du même, une en chef, mie en pointe et deux aux flancs; B d'argent à la croix de gueules chargée en cœur d'une rose d'or et cantonnée de quatre molettes de sable, à la bordure engreslèe de gueules C d'or à trois merlettesde sable, 2 et l,qui est Vuylstèke de Gisignies 1) d'azur, à une épée d'argent garnie d'or, posée en fasce, la pointe à dextre,et acconipagnéede trois merlettesd'argent,deux en chef, une enpointe. Couronne de Vicomte. Supports deux lévriers contournés d'argent, colletés et bouclés d'or, tenant chacun une bannière, celle à dextre aux armes de la premièrepartition, celle à sénestre aux armes de la seconde.
    [Show full text]
  • Under the July Monarchy (1830-1848)
    REPRESENTATIONS OF “LE TRAVAIL” UNDER THE JULY MONARCHY (1830-1848) by Rebecca Terese Powers A dissertation submitted to Johns Hopkins University in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Baltimore, Maryland July, 2015 Representations of le travail under the July Monarchy ABSTRACT This project traces the definition of a social reality of labor under the July Monarchy. More specifically, it investigates how the ubiquitous but elusive term travail – understood as manual, non-agricultural work – operates at different levels of discourse in the 1830s and 1840s. To underline this specific cultural context, I employ the French travail rather than the English “work” or “labor.” French workers expected improved social conditions after their contribution to the 1830 Revolution, but were promptly denied this by the new Constitutional Monarchy. Their frustration came to a head in 1848, when they again revolted, demanding the right to work – le droit au travail. This moment is often considered the dawn of the French labor movement, but I contend that it is in the years leading up to 1848 that travail undergoes its most dramatic definition and consecration as a modern value. In order to better understand how the term took on such significance, I examine a variety of cultural documents, both literary and what we would today consider paraliterary. The corpus includes novels by Honoré de Balzac and George Sand; moralist inquiries by René Villermé and Honoré-Antoine Frégier; Jules Michelet’s historiography of the French people; and writings by the workers themselves, whose first-hand accounts of physical labor were becoming increasingly influential.
    [Show full text]
  • The Hunchback of the July Monarchy
    Introducing Monsieur Mayeux: The Hunchback of the July Monarchy Amanda L. Peters This Thesis was Presented to the Department of the History of Art in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirement for a B.A. with Honors in the Subject of the History of Art University of Michigan Ann Arbor, MI 2016 Advisor: Howard Lay Table of Contents Acknowledgements 3 List of Illustrations 4 Epigraph 8 I. Introduction and Statement of Purpose 9 II. Mayeux and the July Revolution 15 III. Repression & Censorship 20 IV. Mayeux, Rabelais, and the Ladies 27 V. Mayeux, the Pear King, and Poiricide 33 VI. Mayeux Bonaparte 38 VII. Mayeux’s Demise and Afterlife 41 VIII. Conclusion 46 Bibliography 48 Figures 51 2 Acknowledgements Howard— thank you for your ceaseless dedication, patience, and guidance. Your commitment to the thesis project as a whole is inspiring. Thank you for both believing in and challenging me as a writer. Finally, thank you for sharing your love of French art and history. I will be forever grateful for sitting in 271 on my first day of college. Merci mille fois. Mom & Dad—thank you for your endless support in whatever endeavors I take on. Thanks for always believing in me. Dad, sorry this isn’t medicine, but I hope you’re impressed! Anna—thanks for always listening. Ross—thanks for sharing your passion for art and life with me. I will (almost) miss the late nights of coffee, commiseration, and talking more than we worked. Thank you to all of my friends who pretended to listen to me (quite convincingly) ramble on about a fictional hunchback.
    [Show full text]
  • Liberty Leading the Women: Delacroix’S Liberty As Transitional Image
    Kimberly Carroll (Eugene Delacroix. Liberty Leading the People, 1830. Musée du Louvre, Paris.) Liberty Leading the Women: Delacroix’s Liberty as Transitional Image One of the most iconic transformed into a true wom- overthrow of the monarchy works of revolutionary art is an of the people. Delacroix that had been reinstituted Eugene Delacroix’s Liberty introduces through her figure shortly after the first French Leading the People, a paint- a level of specificity that Revolution of 1789 – 99. It ing from 1830 that depicts transcends her traditional debuted in the Paris Salon the July Revolution of the representations as a passive, in 1831 and was met with same year (Fig 1.). The main mythological, or allegorical mixed reactions. figure of the painting is the symbol. In looking to the or- Many were horrified at the symbol of Liberty, an igins of the figure of liberty, depiction of an event in allegorical representation the role of women during the what would have been of the ideal of perfect free- revolutions, the artist’s own contemporary history in dom. Liberty is represented history, and the reappear- which a bare-breasted through the female form, a ance of this figure into our woman was painted leading traditional manner of rep- own contemporary world, the people of France. In the resentation of victory that the evolution of Delacroix’s same year of its debut, the dates back to antiquity (Fig. Liberty as an image can be painting “was censored by 2). Many components of her seen to serve as a bridge Louis-Philippe” and was appearance clearly indicate from a purely allegorical fig- “hidden from the public for that she is an allegorical rep- ure to a real woman.
    [Show full text]
  • Vichy France and the Legacy of the French Revolution
    5 CONTESTED SYMBOLS Lear Prize Winner Contested Symbols: Vichy France and the Legacy of the French Revolution This paper examines how Vichy, the authoritarian government in France throughout most of the Second World War, reckoned with the legacy of the French Revolution. I investigate this relationship through the regime’s treatment of four revolutionary symbols: the figure Marianne, the anthem “La Marseillaise,” the national holiday of Bastille Day, and the slogan of Liberté, Egalité, Fraternité. Because these symbols were deeply embedded in French social and political life, I argue that Vichy could neither fully reject nor embrace them; instead, it pursued a middle ground by twisting the symbols’ meanings and introducing alternatives in line with the traditionalism and ethnocentrism of its National Revolution. In doing so, Vichy attempted to replace the French Republic and the revolutionary values that it stood for with its own vision of the French past, present, and future. Emma Satterfield Written for History 457: Modern Revolutions 1776, 1789, 1917, 1989, 2011 Dr. Peter C. Caldwell SPRING 2019 EMMA SATTERFIELD 6 Since 1789, the themes and struggles at the heart of the French Revolution have been invoked and re-invoked at times of political crisis and change, from the empire of Napoleon to the brief Paris Commune of 1870. At the onset of the twentieth century, even as the Revolution grew more distant with the passing of time, its legacy remained central to the identity of both the French Republic and its citizens. This crystallization of French identity was made possible by the government’s use of a repertoire of revolutionary symbols embodying the ideals of liberty, equality, and brotherhood.
    [Show full text]
  • The Restored Bourbon Monarchy in France 1814-1830
    THE RESTORED BOURBON MONARCHY IN FRANCE 1814-1830. After the defeat of Napoleon and his 1st exile to the land of Elba (1814), the Vienna Congress powers restored the Bourbon monarchy in France under Louis Stanislus Xavier de France who took the title Louis XVIII. This was in accordance to the principle of legitimacy by which rightful rulers were to be restored to their legitimate thrones. Louis XVIII was 60 years and was the eldest brother of King Louis XVI who was executed in Jan 1793. Louis XVIII was both intellectually and by character suitable to be a king. He had a lot of common sense and had learnt a lot from the French revolution and Napoleonic era .He was aware of the faults of his brother that caused his death .He had suffered enough in exile and would never wish to go back. He therefore stood for a policy of compromise and reconciliation between the new and old order in France. However on 1st march 1815, Napoleon escaped from Elba and landed in Paris with 1100 men. He received overwhelming ovation and support from the peasants. The soldiers sent to engage him fraternized when he dimply moved forward, opened his coat and asked, "Which of you will fire against his emperor"? This event forced Louis XVIII to flee to exile once again and Napoleon ruled for 100 more days the allies, who had suffered in the hands of Napoleon, reorganized themselves and defeated Napoleon at the battle of Waterloo on 18th June 1815. Louis XVIII returned from exile with a charter to rule as a constitutional king.
    [Show full text]
  • Neo-Socialism and the Fascist Destiny of an Anti-Fascist Discourse
    "Order, Authority, Nation": Neo-Socialism and the Fascist Destiny of an Anti-Fascist Discourse by Mathieu Hikaru Desan A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Sociology) in the University of Michigan 2016 Doctoral Committee: Professor George Steinmetz, Chair Professor Howard Brick Assistant Professor Robert S. Jansen Emeritus Professor Howard Kimeldorf Professor Gisèle Sapiro Centre national de la recherche scientifique/École des hautes études en sciences sociales Acknowledgments Scholarly production is necessarily a collective endeavor. Even during the long isolated hours spent in dusty archives, this basic fact was never far from my mind, and this dissertation would be nothing without the community of scholars and friends that has nourished me over the past ten years. First thanks are due to George Steinmetz, my advisor and Chair. From the very beginning of my time as a graduate student, he has been my intellectual role model. He has also been my champion throughout the years, and every opportunity I have had has been in large measure thanks to him. Both his work and our conversations have been constant sources of inspiration, and the breadth of his knowledge has been a vital resource, especially to someone whose interests traverse disciplinary boundaries. George is that rare sociologist whose theoretical curiosity and sophistication is matched only by the lucidity of this thought. Nobody is more responsible for my scholarly development than George, and all my work bears his imprint. I will spend a lifetime trying to live up to his scholarly example. I owe him an enormous debt of gratitude.
    [Show full text]
  • Bourbon Restoration 1 Bourbon Restoration
    Bourbon Restoration 1 Bourbon Restoration Royaume de France Kingdom of France 1814–1815 ← 1815–1830 → Flag Royal Coat of arms Anthem Le Retour des Princes Français à Paris "The return of the French Princes in Paris" The Kingdom of France in 1815. Capital Not specified Language(s) French [1] Religion Roman Catholicism Government Constitutional Monarchy King - 1814–1824 Louis XVIII - 1824–1830 Charles X President of the Council - 1815 Charles de Talleyrand-Périgord (first) - 1829–1830 Jules de Polignac (last) Bourbon Restoration 2 Legislature Parliament - Upper house Chamber of Peers - Lower house Chamber of Deputies History - Louis XVIII restored 6 April 1814 - Hundred Days 1815 - Second Restoration 1815 - France invades Spain 1823 - July Revolution July 1830 - Louis-Philippe I declared the King of the French 9 August 1830 Currency French Franc The Bourbon Restoration is the name given to the period following the successive events of the French Revolution (1789–1799), the end of the First French Republic (1792–1804), and then the forcible end of the First French Empire under Napoleon (1804-1814/1815) — when a coalition of European powers restored by arms the monarchy to the heirs of the House of Bourbon who once again became possessors of the Kingdom of France. The Bourbon restoration existed from (about) April 6th, 1814 until the popular uprisings of the July Revolution of 1830, excepting the interval of the "Hundred Days"[2] less than a full year into the restoration when the Bourbon monarchy again had made themselves so unpopular with the general population of France that the family had to once more flee Paris and France to Ghent ahead of exploding civil disorders and collapsing civil authority.
    [Show full text]
  • Revolutionary Insurgency and Revolutionary Republicanism
    REVOLUTIONARY INSURGENCY AND REVOLUTIONARY REPUBLICANISM: ASPECTS OF THE FRENCH REVOLUTIONARY TRADITION FROM THE ADVENT OF THE JULY MONARCHY THROUGH THE REPRESSION OF THE PARIS COMMUNE SUBMITTED BY: DAVID A. SHAFER DEGREE: PhD COLLEGE: UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON ProQuest Number: 10045641 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. uest. ProQuest 10045641 Published by ProQuest LLC(2016). Copyright of the Dissertation is held by the Author. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 ABSTRACT During the greater part of the nineteenth century the French political, social and cultural landscapes continued to reverberate from the echoes of the French Revolution. On one level, the Revolution framed the parameters of political debate. However, on another level the Revolution represented the first time in French history when political activism appeared to open up boundless opportunities for effecting change. In large measure, this was due to the prominence of popular protest in the Revolution and its transformation after 1789. Popular protest was nothing new to France. In fact, it was ingrained in the popular mentalité as a response to grievances. That said, the scope of popular protest during the ancien régime tended to be quite limited and rarely transcended the immediate source of the dispute.
    [Show full text]