DOCSLIB.ORG

Page 1 !N !N !Ã !N !N !N !Ã !N !N !N !N !N !Ã !N !N !N !N !N !N !N !N !N !Ã !N !N !N !N

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Page 1 !N !N !à !N !N !N !à !N !N !N !N !N !à !N !N !N !N !N !N !N !N !N !à !N !N !N !N W t Gallaghers Pond V Fire Pond e e Great Pond S k a r Hegmans Pond North Street Pond d f p l d k Little Pond D l t Rural Pond T d e S R R R th o r y r My Pond n l o Olmstead Rd g e o l N Taylors Pond g P Rd o r N E W T O W N i Abbey t u d R i a s a R B l Packer Brook Rd H r Wicker Brook h d r a D p H ig k riage E H n Car Ridgefield Brook im s D A Pickett Ridge Pond e w ru S v S S d B m e Stepney Elementary lo m t a t r l a n E r d e i ic a r t t d u n M R F L e e West Poquonock Reservoir! R e C d d a k G n L im Barrow Mountain e e R r o H g R g m S n H id E a o l d id dr s l c g w w Falls Pond Goodridge Rd x s a i l R w Rd o R h o t o e y l C H i s i y il G f t d o o H t t e t o D 5 h m e g o 1 c i a g k e d d ea 8 ur r l 0 c e d c R D o h D M r i i C t D n C Edge Pond n 7 A e G P r b A R rea t a r b in S G t Pon h o Redding Ridge l d N t y T R Fire Hill R t p y d rc R k t r a O Gallow d S a a s H u o ill Rd e r M l i n b l c d w l l n y k Mother Superior Lake D l n e e L S a l e d North Street Pond r H e l r y D lmo Rock Pond t l Fil d a 25 R o R H R R Lower Black Pond Fire g g Ln aye SV s H e e d y S d i R ill Blackmans Pond Brook h t r t Ln t 5 c R c u 3 d o o d S h S S y d a u n AQUIFER PROTECTION AREAS t D l o w S O c l u ld h iv n t S o H r a il til M e l l n F e R Rd Umpawaug Pond Brook R D Little Pond P c t H a d r a d u P a r i r i t v Meekers Hill n e il r d a a S C Valley Pond d n d s r Redding Elementary d d t S R y Sanford Pond r r y t D m R w R D t l R n a d F H D a R l L Huckleberry Swamp s H n a i w ir s h e e S ! ro n d d c t e m n ir n a C r i H r t E d H Umpawaug Pond l t B i w e l n L i D L t l o l H d a h s o f o R n n R w r R Maple Rd t t y a r d y l P o l n s r n e i Stepney Rd d d 5 t W esto n, CON N ECTICUT r w 3 D A v H a Big Lake ld n i r e e R d Hedmons Pond o l e S l R n e a l i l h H e R L k i r N w ing B s e T l L ol n n le e s F C a R o L i l u l i Umpawaug Hill a M e d i m H l t b n l n in e p w b iff John Read Middle School B L e r g C k e O o y r a d R y s G k k p h D P o d w R G Lyons Swamp i C n T i d ! T l o C r o u M O N R O E l n t r r Little River L R g n N l t e o r S n i on r B n n e m e R Har a d g o u g w e c t m n W d i r R y b n o l r e l i O S t l t e a h d l R e Rd a a i d e t s U w a n o d g dg h i i S k H w t R t Field Pond e m d O y e i ck t C L D Li d W L o n N N R de ur F n R l n R ser d R p n n d H r d y R u L Stepney d e a R l n d h w l o c S i t w ee w n s R y B t H e g p a G o o Topstone Pond l W Cap Pond 2 T e r i d N u r n M e S d r 5 g T LEGEN D g a o e R a B P R i t a s d d m l W P i o w d l a i n u R S o J y a x d Outpost Inn Pond L y s f a r h R o n v t Twin Lakes n b d Diamond Hill Pond t h l H u i r u e a l u N e t r e d rl Joel Barlow High School l C e e T T n e k r i b r t c R r t tu l o i R a t r o tt d l e m a n y y r Norwalk River B d w M d r n Diamond Pond n R r O D L a ! e L i a r a a n H n Topstone Mountain d i d B c r l n r t D n d R r e d a h d Dr o C t r d ll R l D s G i w a Level A Aquifer Pro tec tio n Area (Fina l Ad o pted ) R H d l d e l v r d M T lo n d D l n l l R l l r R o ar R R l i i D m o t t R e e Dia p d B r S e C s e H e H d a ll R u rb ro re F r a i Barlow Pond w s x s t k H p h u s B C n i e B n n t i les ow y o u S i S r o L d L in s l e L G L d L rm e y n a F t Fa a b c o x s g o R L o L t o C L Moffitts Brook Pond o n r W u n a tp d n w Mill River e n d L u W r R a L Hirams Hill D t O y Steichens Ponds g g o e n n D i c o d d a N d h e W l Saugatuck River e W r d r r o H l Cains Hill o R e d D P n K T d R a T D V oo Level A Aquifer Pro tec tio n Area (Fina l) d l o r w r i w R u o O l en Farm i w n e ill ingville Rd o n d l k r Gre H H t p Pine Tree Pond H l y w a d R c E g ps l F v p G u e o s l y Cemetery Brook i d o v k l t n e 1 C d w d l i x r e e t d 1 d R e R g H Barn R o o R t b R Red r S 6 e 107 r o d a r u i e o e h v S d l l V n t d l T e Farmingville Elementary A R l Tr id k D t o 35 loc r R D m t P d R He B S r s V R r n h l w R Ln Level B Aquifer Pro tec tio n Area (Prelimina ry) n d G R E D D I N G wton I d ! Ne e d s p b P D l i y e e S H i North Farrars Brook Pond d d n V R r l e R n B P Strongs Pond t i y e d n u R o l le u e R t l u L R t d a R r c r b r R H n o S x e o b o d a e e F Mirror Lake e rw d Quarry Rock Rd r e r Ct r r Titicus Pond h i he w c d d it t K R L G S s d o Moffitts Pond g N d R d e North Farrars Brook T R L R d e e S out y H y n h r g y n S e w r t B L L r r Redding Glen Rock Raymond u u e e g i d d r l b n e R Great Swamp n a R w n u S s F s e b t n b s n e c re u p i K t Ridgefield Brook u c a o d k M A e e E r o l H H e in y t m L 0 k Millers Pond e 7 k c n L H o S i n L c R R g t a ill o R u h L n d d u n d Windy Hill H R R B V R n re e s c Diamond Hill l i d d Silver Birch Ln r A a l b v d y g t t c D u n e R Moffitts Brook e e k S v d a r t e Nob Crook Brook u h y S r h R R e s R R s C i S l a L v o D d S l d T o u d i u Tatetuck Brook n n o s c n l r et n y d H Ln k t n i a l e bert St G H t r y S Gil i T n W v u D R S V d u p p t l a a a d R i a i A S l l t R d d r t l q l l ec P e i y k Livermore Pond d s e R i t i sp y H Florida Pond d g g n M o n G e a t Pr l R a Mallory Ln s V id e F R u n g d l W R e d i a a e h r I i o R o d y s a Ivy Hill l n r n M L v a d F y n D b Mountain Road Pond n r e H o u T i L T S i m A d e a s b i r l l vere P L e ll o Re H l r o g R s y t A e R I D G E F I E L D d n i n a t e a Florida Hill Pond d n e M e l Branchville Brook Dam L r V E A i L a S v n o v d a e n n t Florida Hill u e Prospect Hill t Southern Pond G F y d resh B Meadow Dr L Catoonah St P Lounsebury Pond n C d Mountain Pond r Tercero Pond n R R t r e D n od a d o L wo d y T e R l r l ge r i l r s w id 7 n u n a p R u T lo F d b lw R Crescent Pond l Veterans Park Elementary e b b ¤£ a r d lo o u B T R U MSax B U L L s n O e ony c a L d r s i Dr r t h e r n i ry r R h R S d c b ! n o t Griffith Ln a k h d R S d ic e w a e y Easton Reservoir v Florida Hill Road Pond H d u A g J R e a e o r y r n f d d n W ta f P w r it r D L s r o D d e B d a Gilbert Brook S n d D y R r d r r do To s ll C r R A e P i pe o L l L Sem East Ridge Middle H Cooper Pond Brook o p b a inole Trl o o C n i r n y t p im D r B Iv o s tl d k a n e l D W or y ! p L e nf A b Ln n B a e King e n B o D S v r n d L L r L Rd r o r Crown Pond ay o e y ry ville d e n e t O h L ur nch H R s o S Bra id t n u n r R l Cedar Mountain s to h R l i l l d d s Ln H D l r i il y n n l n Patterson Brook rm O e M w a R H H D L L F i la R Fuller Pond g d p l L n ee o l Johns Pond i r r a o d o d b T d n m h Linc D W oln Ln o e u ld d i O y r l n R W o a R r N C u J S C A le P n ul e S a G i a F h A u l u d d y l L i R g n r B t R s Huckleberry Hill a ock d t o t g well d o R R d m d e R h d a o n h n e Hazen Pond l rc m i l u u q o e d i Candees Pond h EXPLAN ATION M n C u A o w g s s g i n H Chub Brook o C n v L e r t t B d s R R D L e o u l D e y l L d l e R n d W d n o R n J d n 102 n H l l d Saugatuck Reservoir e d e C e S Grimes Pond i t g o V l o R r o f R i a i B t t f o a f l s P m l y i f l H i r e u w e p d e S n p e R e l N r e v S d e W t H r n r y o r e a r R d s o r r Branchville Elementary Branchville Brook d t Ballwall Brook o D y L a D i u r C C o n r u n L l Biddle Hill R e L d R p r c l B t g The Aquifer Pro tec tio n Pro gra m, a d ministered b y the spec ific , d eta iled mo d eling o f the gro und wa ter flo w n i n k S n l e h d s k d b o ta e i d h ! w H y o te m b R W l D r l s s e H a r a b Gilbert Bennett Brook b o w o R r s d b r e y o D R a l o e B 1 h w d d 0 d n H le l e d 2 d r p k d i e e p l s r R a Co nnec tic ut Depa rtment o f Energy & Enviro nmenta l system a t the well field .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Newmar Corporation Warranty Department
    1301 Stahley Drive Building #42 Newmar Dealer Svc. 866-290-5371 Nappanee, IN 46550 Customer Svc. 800-731-8300 Corporation Warranty Department Technical Service Bulletin Date Issued Model Year(s) Affected TSB # 2/18/16 revised 8/22/19 2007-2015 446 Brand Bay Star Sport Ventana Essex Bay Star Dutch Star King Aire Canyon Star Mountain Aire Other Ventana LE London Aire Description Newmar Corporation has decided that a defect relating to motor vehicle safety exists in specific motor homes. NHTSA#: 16V 008 TC#: 2016-018 Newmar Corporation has been advised by Lippert Components that on certain motorhomes using LCI Coachstep electric double or triple entrance steps, there is the potential of a structural fracture within the Lippert step assembly. Issue: There is the potential of a structural fracture of the center bolt of the fan gear assembly which may cause the fan gear assembly to disengage from the steps. This issue creates an unstable platform, which could cause a person to fall and result in injury. Recommended Action Correction: Contact your Service Account Manager to obtain authorization and to order parts. Double Step Kit: part # 029718 Triple Step Kit: part # 029719 Flat Rate Code: 16V 008 Labor Time: Double Step .3 hr. Triple Step .5 hr. Please read this bulletin in its entirety prior to beginning any diagnosis or repairs. If you have any questions regarding this T.S.B., please contact a Warranty Service Representative at Newmar Corporation. NEWMAR CORPORATION NEWMARCORP.COM Date: February 17, 2016 Re: Newmar Corporation – Motor Vehicle Recall Notification Subject:Recall Campaign No.: 16V 008 This notice is sent to you as a Newmar Dealer in accordance with the requirements of the National Traffic and Motor Vehicle Safety Act.
    [Show full text]
  • August 2015 ERA Bulletin.Pub
    The ERA BULLETIN - AUGUST, 2015 Bulletin Electric Railroaders’ Association, Incorporated Vol. 58, No. 8 August, 2015 The Bulletin TWO ANNIVERSARIES — Published by the Electric SEA BEACH AND STEINWAY TUNNEL Railroaders’ Association, Incorporated, PO Box The first Brooklyn Rapid Transit (BRT) was incorporated on August 29, 1896. 3323, New York, New steel cars started operating in revenue ser- BRT acquired the company’s stock on or York 10163-3323. N about November 5, 1897. The line was elec- vice on the Sea Beach Line (now ) and the new Fourth Avenue Subway one hundred trified with overhead trolley wire at an un- For general inquiries, years ago, June 22, 1915. Revenue opera- known date. contact us at bulletin@ tion began at noon with trains departing from A March 1, 1907 agreement allowed the erausa.org . ERA’s Chambers Street and Coney Island at the company to operate through service from the website is th www.erausa.org . same time. Two– and three-car trains were Coney Island terminal to 38 Street and New routed via Fourth Avenue local tracks and Utrecht Avenue. Starting 1908 or earlier, nd Editorial Staff: southerly Manhattan Bridge tracks. trains operate via the Sea Beach Line to 62 Editor-in-Chief : On March 31, 1915, Interborough Rapid Street and New Utrecht Avenue, the West Bernard Linder End (now D) Line, and the Fifth Avenue “L.” Tri-State News and Transit, Brooklyn Rapid Transit, and Public Commuter Rail Editor : Service Commission officials attended BRT’s Sea Beach cars were coupled to West End Ronald Yee exhibit of the new B-Type cars, nicknamed or Culver cars.
    [Show full text]
  • Transit Oriented Development Final Report | September 2010
    FTA ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS DRAFT/FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT DANBURY BRANCH IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM TRANSIT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT FINAL REPORT | SEPTEMBER 2010 In Cooperation with U.S. Department CONNECTICUT South Western Regional Planning Agency of Transportation DEPARTMENT OF Federal Transit TRANSPORTATION Administration FTA ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS DRAFT/FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT DANBURY BRANCH IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM TRANSIT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT FINAL REPORT | SEPTEMBER 2010 In Cooperation with U.S. Department CONNECTICUT South Western Regional Planning Agency of Transportation DEPARTMENT OF Federal Transit TRANSPORTATION Administration Abstract This report presents an evaluation of transit-oriented development (TOD) opportunities within the Danbury Branch study corridor as a component of the Federal Transit Administration Alternatives Analysis/ Draft Environmental Impact Statement (FTA AA/DEIS) prepared for the Connecticut Department of Transportation (CTDOT). This report is intended as a tool for municipalities to use as they move forward with their TOD efforts. The report identifies the range of TOD opportunities at station areas within the corridor that could result from improvements to the Danbury Branch. By also providing information regarding FTA guidelines and TOD best practices, this report serves as a reference and a guide for future TOD efforts in the Danbury Branch study corridor. Specifically, this report presents a definition of TOD and the elements of TOD that are relevant to the Danbury Branch. It also presents a summary of FTA Guidance regarding TOD and includes case studies of FTA-funded projects that have been rated with respect to their livability, land use, and economic development components. Additionally, the report examines commuter rail projects both in and out of Connecticut that are considered to have applications that may be relevant to the Danbury Branch.
    [Show full text]
  • Financial Analyses Included Herein Present the Operating Revenues and Expenses Only for Those Properties Governed by the State Lease Agreements
    SSSeeewwwaaarrrddd aaannnddd Monde CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS RAIL GOVERNANCE STUDY Task 4.3 – Financial Review Connecticut Department of Transportation Table of Contents INTRODUCTION ........... ............... ............... ......................... ............... 1 - 3 OVERVIEW OF ALL STATIONS ............... ............... ......................... ............... 4 - 8 STATION COMPARISON ANALYSIS Five Year Totals ............... ............... ......................... ............... 9 Year end June 30, 1996 ............... ............... ......................... ............... 10 Year end June 30, 1997 ............... ............... ......................... ............... 11 Year end June 30, 1998 ............... ............... ......................... ............... 12 Year end June 30, 1999 ............... ............... ......................... ............... 13 Year end June 30, 2000 ............... ............... ......................... ............... 14 STATIONS - NEW HAVEN LINE Main Line New Haven Finances ........... ............... ............... ......................... ............... 15 - 19 Station and Parking Operations Profit (Loss) - 1996--2000 ............... 20 - 22 Milford Finances ........... ............... ............... ......................... ............... 23 - 25 Station and Parking Operations Profit (Loss) - 1996--2000 ............... 26 - 28 Stratford Finances ........... ............... ............... ......................... ............... 29 - 31 Station and Parking
    [Show full text]
  • A Q U I F E R P R O T E C T I O N a R E a S N O R W a L K , C O N N E C T I C
    !n !n S c Skunk Pond Beaver Brook Davidge Brook e d d k h P O H R R O F p S o i d t n n l c t u i l R a T S d o i ll l t e e lv i d o t R r r d r l h t l l a H r n l t r M b a s b R d H e G L R o r re R B C o o u l e t p o n D o e f L i s Weston Intermediate School y l o s L d r t e Huckleberry Hills Brook e t d W d r e g Upper Stony Brook Pond N L D g i b R o s n Ridgefield Pond a t v d id e g e H r i l Country Club Pond b e a R d r r S n n d a g e L o n tin a d ! R d l H B n t x H e W Still Pond d t n Comstock Knoll u d a R S o C R k R e L H d i p d S n a l l F tt h Town Pond d l T te r D o e t l e s a t u e L e c P n n b a n l R g n i L t m fo D b k H r it to Lower Stony Brook Pond o r A d t P n d s H t F u d g L d d i Harrisons Brook R h e k t R r a e R m D l S S e e G E o n y r f ll H rt R r b i i o e n s l t ld d d o r l ib l a e r R d L r O e H w i Fanton Hill g r l Cider Mill School P y R n a ll F i e s w L R y 136 e a B i M e C H k A s t n d o i S d V l n 3 c k r l t g n n a d R i u g d o r a L 3 ! a l r u p d R d e c L S o s e Hurlbutt Elementary School R d n n d D A i K w T n d o O n D t f R l g d R l t ad L i r e R e e r n d L a S i m a o f g n n n D d n R o t h n Middlebrook School ! l n t w Lo t a 33 i n l n i r E id d D w l i o o W l r N e S a d l e P g n V n a h L C r L o N a r N a S e n e t l e b n l e C s h f ! d L nd g o a F i i M e l k rie r id F C a F r w n P t e r C ld l O e r a l y v f e u e o O n e o a P i O i s R w e t n a e l a n T t b s l d l N l k n t g i d u o e a o R W R Hasen Pond n r r n M W B y t Strong
    [Show full text]
  • Branchville Individual Station Report
    BRANCHVILLE TRAIN STATION VISUAL INSPECTION REPORT January 2007 Prepared by the Bureau of Public Transportation Connecticut Department of Transportation Branchville Train Station Visual Inspection Report January 2007 Overview: The Branchville Train Station is located on Route 7 in the southeast corner of Ridgefield. It is relatively easy to find, although a station sign is needed at each of the two entrances. Vehicular access is provided over two river bridges in varied stages of disrepair. The station is nestled between the Norwalk River, the railroad tracks, Depot Road and Portland Avenue. The station building houses a bakery and gift shop. New sidewalk and black railing separate the full parking lot from the tracks. An awning provides some shelter for patrons of the bakery or waiting commuters. The area is neat, likely from the housekeeping efforts of bakery personnel. A high-level platform with stairs and a ramp provides access to the rail cars. The platform has a full-length canopy and benches. Maintenance Responsibilities: Owner: State Operator: Town Platform Lights: Metro-North Trash: Metro-North Snow Removal: Town Shelter Glazing: Town Platform Canopy: Town Platform Structure: Town Parking: Town Page 2 Branchville Train Station Visual Inspection Report January 2007 Station Layout: Aerial Photo by Aero-Metric, Inc. – Graphics by Urbitran as part of the Rail Governance Study Station Building State-Owned Parking Area Page 3 Branchville Train Station Visual Inspection Report January 2007 Train Station Visual Inspection Parameters: The Connecticut Department of Transportation (Department) recently inspected all 36 New Haven Line train stations to assess their appearance, safety, means of access and overall condition.
    [Show full text]
  • Danbury Branch Improvement Program Task 5
    W FTA ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS DRAFT/FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT DANBURY BRANCH IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM TASK 5 ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM STATE PROJECT 302-008 SECTION 18: VISUAL RESOURCES MAY 2009 State Project No. 302-008 Connecticut Department of Transportation Danbury Branch Improvement Program AA/DEIS SECTION 18. VISUAL RESOURCES INTRODUCTION This section describes the visual resources in the study corridor. Visual resources contribute greatly to environmental quality, shaping the views and aesthetic experiences of people’s daily lives. Visual resources include natural landscape elements as well as features of the built environment. The quality of the visual experience depends on many factors, including the physical attributes of objects, the combination of objects and features in view, the location of visual elements in relation to the viewer, the condition of the elements, their uniqueness, viewer perceptions, and cultural connotations, among many others. Descriptions of landscape characteristics and features under existing conditions lay the groundwork for evaluating the effects of a project on the visual environment. Regulatory Context There are no federal and state laws that specifically protect visual resources across the board. There are, however, several important references to visual resources within the context of historic preservation and coastal zone management statutes. The implications of these legal protections are described below. At the Federal level, the following legislation is relevant to the project:
    [Show full text]
  • The RPI Website 10
    10 The RPI Website Jason Sodergren Abstract.—Hawkcount.org is an online database system that provides data submission, reporting, and storage services for hawk migration watchsites. Here, I outline current features of the online database system, implementation details, and plans for future system develop- ment. Hawkcount.org is an online database system that provides count and observation data entry, storage, and reporting services for migration watchsites. This system was implemented in 1999–2000 as a single-site data reporting system for the Holiday Beach Migration Observatory watchsite near Amherstburg, Ontario, Canada. This early version pro- vided functionality related to daily reporting of observed raptor counts at the site. Results were made available immediately on the Holiday Beach web site, and automated e-mail reports were submitted daily to various mailing lists, including the BIRDHAWK list maintained by the Hawk Migration Association of North America (HMANA), regional bird-related mailing lists, and others. One of the primary goals of the original system involved the simplifi - cation of the hawk counters’ daily reporting tasks, including eliminating the need to submit hard-copy daily paper forms. Each day, the counter (or other site representative) “reported” the day’s results to several places, including a hard-copy daily report form or HMANA “greensheet” to be submitted to HMANA, various e-mail lists, and the Autumn HawkWatch system, an internet-based database system that, as the result of collabora- tion among Hawk Mountain Sanctuary, the Cornell Lab of Ornithology, and the Hawk Migration Association of North America, provided a database of Hawk Migration Association of North America, P.O.
    [Show full text]
  • Train Station Models Building Guide 2018
    Building Guide for Season’s Greenings: All Aboard! 1 Index of buildings and dioramas Biltmore Depot North Carolina Page 3 Metro-North Cannondale Station Connecticut Page 4 Central Railroad of New Jersey Terminal New Jersey Page 5 Chattanooga Train Shed Tennessee Page 6 Cincinnati Union Terminal Ohio Page 7 Citrus Groves Florida Page 8 Dino Depot -- Page 9 East Glacier Park Station Montana Page 10 Ellicott City Station Maryland Page 11 Gettysburg Lincoln Railroad Station Pennsylvania Page 12 Grain Elevator Minnesota Page 13 Grain Fields Kansas Page 14 Grand Canyon Depot Arizona Page 15 Grand Central Terminal New York Page 16 Kirkwood Missouri Pacific Depot Missouri Page 17 Lahaina Station Hawaii Page 18 Los Angeles Union Station California Page 19 Michigan Central Station Michigan Page 20 North Bennington Depot Vermont Page 21 North Pole Village -- Page 22 Peanut Farms Alabama Page 23 Pennsylvania Station (interior) New York Page 24 Pikes Peak Cog Railway Colorado Page 25 Point of Rocks Station Maryland Page 26 Salt Lake City Union Pacific Depot Utah Page 27 Santa Fe Depot California Page 28 Santa Fe Depot Oklahoma Page 29 Union Station Washington Page 30 Union Station D.C. Page 31 Viaduct Hotel Maryland Page 32 Vicksburg Railroad Barge Mississippi Page 33 2 Biltmore Depot Asheville, North Carolina built 1896 Building Materials Roof: pine bark Facade: bark Door: birch bark, willow, saltcedar Windows: willow, saltcedar Corbels: hollowed log Porch tread: cedar Trim: ash bark, willow, eucalyptus, woody pear fruit, bamboo, reed, hickory nut Lettering: grapevine Chimneys: jequitiba fruit, Kielmeyera fruit, Schima fruit, acorn cap credit: Village Wayside Bar & Grille Wayside Village credit: Designed by Richard Morris Hunt, one of the premier architects in American history, the Biltmore Depot was commissioned by George Washington Vanderbilt III.
    [Show full text]
  • Connecticut State Rail Plan, 2012
    DRAFT 2012 CONNECTICUT STATE RAIL PLAN __________________________________________________________________ THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY BLANK Page 1 DRAFT 2012 CONNECTICUT STATE RAIL PLAN __________________________________________________________________ State of Connecticut Department of Transportation 2012-2016 Connecticut State Rail Plan Prepared by: BUREAU OF PUBLIC TRANSPORATION, OFFICE OF RAIL CONNECTICUT DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 50 UNION AVENUE, FOURTH FLOOR WEST NEW HAVEN, CONNECTICUT 06519 Page 2 DRAFT 2012 CONNECTICUT STATE RAIL PLAN __________________________________________________________________ TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES .......................................................................................................... 5 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................ 7 CHAPTER 1 – STATE RAIL VISION, GOALS, AND OBJECTIVES .............................. 9 1.1 MISSION STATEMENT, VISION, AND VALUES ........................................................................ 9 1.2 GOALS AND OBJECTIVES FOR RAIL SERVICE IN CONNECTICUT ..................................... 10 CHAPTER 2 – FEDERAL AND STATE MANDATES .................................................. 13 2.1 FEDERAL LEGISLATION AND PLANNING REQUIREMENTS ................................................ 14 2.2 STATE LEGISLATION AND PLANNING REQUIREMENTS ..................................................... 15 CHAPTER 3 – DESCRIPTION OF RAIL SYSTEM IN CONNECTICUT ....................... 18
    [Show full text]
  • Customer Opinion Survey Final Report
    Task 1.2: Customer Opinion Survey Final Report URBITRANR EPORT URBITRAN Prepared to Connecticut Department of Transportation S ubmitted by Urbitran Associates, Inc. May 2003 Task 1.2:Technical Memorandum Customer Opinion Survey TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY OF FINDINGS ............................................................................................1 BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE ....................................................................................................................................1 METHODOLOGY.........................................................................................................................................................1 FINDINGS ..................................................................................................................................................................1 EXHIBIT 1: SURVEY SAMPLE.....................................................................................................................................2 COMPARISON TO METRO-NORTH RAILROAD CUSTOMER OPINION SURVEY ...........................................................10 CHAPTER ONE: GENERAL PROFILE OF SURVEY RESPONDENTS.........................................................12 SYSTEM-WIDE ANALYSIS OF SURVEY QUESTIONS 1, 2, AND 3 .................................................................................13 SYSTEM-WIDE ANALYSIS OF SURVEY QUESTIONS 4, 5, 6, AND 7 .............................................................................15 SYSTEM-WIDE ANALYSIS OF SURVEY
    [Show full text]
  • I. Introduction to the Upper East Branch Delaware Recreational Access Plan
    I. Introduction to the Upper East Branch Delaware Recreational Access Plan In the wake of Tropical Storm Irene, municipal leaders and other stakeholders can no longer underestimate the value of open space along streams and the role that floodplains play. The recommendations in this plan are consistent with floodplain protection that and advocate for encouraging recreational access in many instances, including when parcels are acquired as part of a flood buyout or when funding opportunities are available to communities after a disaster, such as a flood, in hazard-prone areas. Opportunities, such as flood hazard 1Photo. 1. Margaretville Access Point in 2011 mitigation projects or stream restoration projects, such as those presented by the NY Community Rising initiative (Community Reconstruction Zone), and the Local Flood Analysis (LFA give communities in the upper East Branch Delaware watershed an opportunity to not only plan and prepare better, but also opportunities to enhance recreation and tourism – the foundation of the local economy. These funding opportunities involve aspects of community planning and visioning aimed at reducing flood risk and community 2Photo 2. The same access point in September 2011 resiliency, but also support economic development. With the added support of the local leaders, the programs currently underway will provide for future opportunities to develop economically sustainable regions. The recreational opportunities coupled with resilient Main Street development in the Hub areas will enhance the local tourism economy in the future. Critical, But Often Over-Looked Types of Access In addition to traditional public access areas along waterbodies, such as for fishing and boat launches, two other forms of access, were often identified throughout this project – the need for information on and access to swimming holes and wildlife viewing/watching areas.
    [Show full text]