DOCSLIB.ORG

I. from the Ancient Times Until

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Scientific Works. Series C. Veterinary Medicine. Vol. LIX (3) ISSN 2065-1295, ISSN Online 2067-3663, ISSN-L 2065-1295 OF THE CONC ERN S OF OU R ANC ES TORS IN THE CARPATO-D ANUBIO -P ONTIC REGIO N FOR ANIMAL BREE DING (I. From t he ancien t t imes un til t he Romans leving Dacia) Dumi tru CURC Ă Faculty of Veterinary Me dicine, 105 Sp laiu l Indepen den ܊ei, sector 5, 050097 Bucharest, Ro mania Correspon ding author e-m ai l: curca _fi ziopat @yahoo.co m ABSTRACT I. From the Neo/eneolithic, bronze an d ir on ag es. The popula tion of the Cucut eni cultu re was hunter s an d ag ri cultu ri sts an d han dicrafts men su ch as weaver s, pott er y worker s an d too lmaker s. The archaeology displa y sever al artefac ts or painting s on cer amics pictu ri ng the an imal specie s us ed by the people of that time: A zoo morphic re pre sentation; Zoo morphic pictu re ; Z ooo morphic vess el. II . From the peri od of the R oman occ upation (1 st – 3rd centu rie s). O n the Column of Trajan , histo ri c monument from Rome built upon order of Trajan E mp er or in comm emoration of his victo ry from D ac ia, by Apolodorus de D amasc an d pre ser ved until ou r pre sent time. R eac hing the apogee of the histo ri c R oman bas-re lie f, the 12 4 episo des ca rved in spir al on the Column, ill ust rating the Comm entarie s of Trajan about the D ac ic wars (De bell o dac ico), by their charac ter of histo ri c document, are a true document about the conc er ns of the D ac ian s for the bree ding an d us e of horses in defenc e. Some intere st ing scenes depict domest ica ted an imal s us ed for sac ri fices or for foo d. Anot her imp ortan t monument is the “T ri ump hal Monument” loca ted north of Adamcl isi comm une in D obrogea, in an are a of fore st ed hill s. Among the bas-re lie fs from Adamcl isi one may not ice thos e showing grou ps of shee p an d goats , specie s loved by the people who inhabited an d st ill inhabits these plac es. II I. Histo ri ography us ing ter minology from the R oman ian ling uist ic. The moder n R oman ian la ng uag e is considere d a Roman ic lang uag e. From the D ac ian -T hrac ic-I liri c lang uag es in the basic lexical fund will st ill have just about (1 70- 180) 165 words, su ch as: hearth, earth, ash, child, infan t, meadow, orog, hornbeam, comm on oak, fir tree , chee se, so ft cow chee se, whey, ford, swamp, wave, su nset, su nri se, swarm, peas, ca bb ag e, grapes, wild boar, st ork, head ker chie f, sca rf, peasan t san dal , hoo d, pole, hill , shore , etc. The apicultu ral ter minology is la rgely of Latin ori gin an d it is one of the st rong est arguments for under st an ding the st able life of the R oman ian s. B ee bree ding words of Latin ori gin: al bina (bee ), stu p (bee hive), fag ur (honey comb), miere (honey), ceară (w ax), păst ură (maiden wax). Foll owing are sever al bee bree ding words of Sla v ori gin: pri sac ă (bee ga rden), matcă (q uee n), trânto r (mal e bee ), R oi (swarm), B ezmetic (w an der ing aimless ly).Other Sla v ter ms with the same mean ing : ulei (oil), from the B g. uleju in O ltenia; útiubei , from Ukr. stu b+su f. – ei , in Moldova an d B ucovina ; coúniĠă , from the old Sl. kos nica , in Tran sylvan ia an d B an at. Key words: ours ancestors, concerns, ani mal bree ding, Ro manian ter mino logy I. FROM THE NEO/ENEOLITHIC, the Neo lithic Age, with specific high -han dle BRON ZE AND IRON AGES pots an d large vesse ls adorne d with gir dles (no paintings ). The two sites with bron ze The neo /eneo lithic age (6000 -2000 B.C. ) objects (scythes an d soc kete d axes ), surprises by the evolved too ls (han d axe an d unearthe d at Ruginoasa an d Doljeúti (Nea mĠ pierce d axe ), by the diversity of the incise d County ) are spectacu lar disco veries (2, 4). We pottery or of the pottery painte d with spira l- can also notice a wide range of bron ze win ding motifs (storage vesse ls, bowls, lids, needles, of different si zes, so me bone piercers support -v esse ls, vesse ls for re ligious an d pen dants. These artefacts in dicate the purposes ). Most of it is specific to the Pre - progress fro m the stage of „pre dator ” to the Cucuteni an d Cucuteni cu lture (phases A, A- stage of „gro wer -har vester ”. They were B) also due to the anthropo morphic an d disco vere d at the sites fro m Bu dăile-Blănariu, zoo morphic design (hu man representations - Văleni, Săbăoani (Nea mĠ County ) an d Bra d idols, an d representations of different (Bac ău County). The transition from ani mals). It also inc ludes the Cucuteni (phase prehistory to anti quity is intro duce d by the C) „co mbed pottery ”, adorne d with a toothe d Dacic stan dar d (engra ved on a Dacian vesse l too l, si milar to a co mb (26, 27). unearthed at Bu dureasca - Praho va County), The bron ze age (22 00 -11 00 B.C. ) stan ds out exhi bite d in Ha ll no. 3, as an in vitation to by the different for ms of pottery, co mpare d to 197 learn about the Geto -Dacic ci vilization. Thus, hair pin with the hea d in the shape of a swan, starting fro m Ha ll no. 4, all ocate d to the older petrifie d bir d egg. There also are fi ve si lver stage of the Geto -Dacic history (4th -2nd coin treasures unearthe d at St ăni Ġa, Bo zieni, centuries B.C. ), one can notice a broa d range Făurei, Si mione úti úi Tămăúeni – Nea mĠ of obj ects characteristic to their materia l County (1st century B.C. - 2nd century A. D.). cu lture. Most of these items ha ve been In 188 9, at the 10th Congress of History an d unearthe d fro m the most long -lasting Thraco logy he ld at Paris, professor Butureanu archaeo logica l site (over 45 years of presente d the “First scientific disco veries research ), locate d at Bra d-N egri (present ly in about the antiquities unearthed at Băiceni - Bac ău County ), where was the Dacian fortress Cucuteni “, which were of great interest (2). mentione d by the Gree k geographer Clau diu Im presse d by what he hear d at the French Pto lemeu (1st - 2nd centuries A. D.), as Congress of History an d Thraco logy, the Zargi dava (7, 18, 19). Ger man researcher Hu bert Sch midt ca me to The co mb ination bet ween the ite ms of Geto - poor Mo ldova, in 1892 (22 ). Here, he starte d Dacic tra dition : pottery (censer, jar -v esse ls, digging in the hi ll s aroun d the vill age of cups, small cups, strainers, fruit -ho lding Băiceni -Cucuteni an d deter mine d the vita l vesse ls etc. ), so me agricu ltura l an d crafts men truth for our Ro manian history : the sett lement tools (k ni ves, plough coulter, axes ), orna ment fro m Cucuteni is the oldest site fro m South - an d househo ld obj ects (brace lets, rings, ear - Eastern Europe. rings, bea ds, hair pins, mirrors ) or ite ms Hu bert Sch midt (Figure 1 a), the researchers specific to different acti vities (bone piercer, who ha d pre vious ly disco vere d the Troy spin dle whor ls, fishing hoo ks, arro w hea ds Fortress, unearthe d the Cucuteni ci vilisation, etc. ), an d the importe d obj ects, of Gree k- restoring the initia l meanings of our history. Ro man origin (amphorae, trays, go blets ) The „Ger man “, ho w the vill agers ca ll ed hi m, sho w differences specific to each historic was the first one to spe ll the na me of the perio d (evolution of the different for ms of Mo ldavian vill age abro ad. The vill agers fro m pottery, appearance or disappearance of Cucuteni didn’t forget hi m ever since. The particu lar obj ects, etc. ). vill age Băiceni -Cucuteni – is locate d 8 Besi des the evidence which confir m the basic kilometres fro m the roa d fro m Târgu Fru mos occupations of the Dacians (agricu lture, to Hârlău, Iaúi County. This small vill age ani mal hus ban dry, pottery -m aking, fishing, which “turne d upsi de-d own” the history of hunting, spinning etc.
Recommended publications
  • Archäologie Und Politik

    Archäologie Und Politik

    1 CHRISTIAN WITSCHEL Römische Außenpolitik Kaiser Trajan, die Dakerkriege und die Donauprovinzen Politica externă romană Împăratul Traian, războaiele dacice și provinciile dunărene Roman Foreign Policy Emperor Trajan, the Dacian Wars and the Danube Provinces 28 CHRISTIAN WITSCHEL Im Zentrum dieses Bandes steht ein În centrul acestui volum se află un At the centre of this volume stands an imposantes Monument, das der römi- monument impunător, înălțat de imposing monument built by the Roman sche Kaiser Trajan (reg. 98–117 n. Chr.) împăratul roman Traian (domnie: emperor Trajan (r. 98–117 CE) to com- zur Erinnerung an seine Siege über 98–117 d. Hr.) pentru a comemora vic- memorate his victories over the Dacian das Volk der Daker errichten ließ: das toriile sale asupra poporului dacilor: people: The Tro paeum Traiani at Adam- Tro paeum Traiani bei Adam klissi [4]. Tro paeum Traiani, de la Adam clisi [4]. clisi [4]. It is located south of the Danube, Es befindet sich südlich der Donau, Acesta este situat la sud de Dunăre, în in the Dobruja landscape in southeast in der Landschaft Dobrudscha ganz peisajul Dobrogei, în sud-estul Româ- Romania. Given the location of the Tro- im Süd osten des heutigen Rumänien. niei de astăzi. Având în vedere locația paeum, one question immediately arises: Angesichts des Standortes des Tro- monumentului, survine nemijlocit între- Why was it not built in the heartland of paeum stellt sich unmittelbar eine barea: de ce nu a fost edificat în inte- the Dacian Empire conquered by Trajan, Frage: Warum wurde dieses nicht im riorul Regatului Dac, cucerit de Traian, i.
  • The Rock As a Topos of Faith. the Interactive Zone of the Rock-Cut Monuments

    The Rock As a Topos of Faith. the Interactive Zone of the Rock-Cut Monuments

    Geoarchaeology and Archaeomineralogy (Eds. R. I. Kostov, B. Gaydarska, M. Gurova). 2008. Proceedings of the International Conference, 29-30 October 2008 Sofia, Publishing House “St. Ivan Rilski”, Sofia, 153-162. THE ROCK AS A TOPOS * OF FAITH THE INTERACTIVE ZONE OF THE ROCK-CUT MONUMENTS – FROM URARTU TO THRACE Valeria Fol Centre of Thracology “Prof. Alexander Fol”, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, 1000 Sofia; [email protected] ABSTRACT. The article discusses the rock topoi of faith as places for profession of a mysterial faith and ritualism, which should not be ethnically defined, because in its core lies the honoring of the stone/rock as a location for divine advent. Initial observations of natural and rock-cut topoi of faith in a like constructions in greater detail, as well as archaeological mountain environment have been done in the Eastern sites (mainly fortresses) and finds related to them in Strandzha Mediterranean as early as the second half of the XIX c., Mountain, Sakar Mountain, the Rhodopes and Eastern Stara however it is only recently that their cultural-historical role and Planina (Haemus). The interpretation of the megaliths is being their regional interactions began to be researched without the inserted in the widely accepted thesis for their functions as ritual faith and the cults professed in them to be charged with tombs of the population of the coastal hinterland. Some of the ethnic definitions. There are a series of examples from the dolmens had been used a lot from the middle of the II until the Southeastern Mediterranean and Asia Minor where the middle of the I mill.
  • Romania Redivivus

    Romania Redivivus

    alexander clapp ROMANIA REDIVIVUS nce the badlands of neoliberal Europe, Romania has become its bustling frontier. A post-communist mafia state that was cast to the bottom of the European heap by opinion- makers sixteen years ago is now billed as the success story Oof eu expansion.1 Its growth rate at nearly 6 per cent is the highest on the continent, albeit boosted by fiscal largesse.2 In Bucharest more politicians have been put in jail for corruption over the past decade than have been convicted in the rest of Eastern Europe put together. Romania causes Brussels and Berlin almost none of the headaches inflicted by the Visegrád Group—Czechia, Hungary, Poland, Slovakia— which in 1993 declined to accept Romania as a peer and collectively entered the European Union three years before it. Romanians con- sistently rank among the most Europhile people in the Union.3 An anti-eu party has never appeared on a Romanian ballot, much less in the parliament. Scattered political appeals to unsavoury interwar traditions—Legionnairism, Greater Romanianism—attract fewer voters than do far-right movements across most of Western Europe. The two million Magyars of Transylvania, one of Europe’s largest minorities, have become a model for inter-ethnic relations after a time when the park benches of Cluj were gilded in the Romanian tricolore to remind every- one where they were. Indeed, perhaps the aptest symbol of Romania’s place in Europe today is the man who sits in the Presidential Palace of Cotroceni in Bucharest. Klaus Iohannis—a former physics teacher at a high school in Sibiu, once Hermannstadt—is an ethnic German head- ing a state that, a generation ago, was shipping hundreds of thousands of its ‘Saxons’ ‘back’ to Bonn at 4,000–10,000 Deutschmarks a head.
  • The Greek “Proto-Question” and the Birth of Modern Citizenship

    The Greek “Proto-Question” and the Birth of Modern Citizenship

    Chapter 1 The Greek “Proto-Question” and the Birth of Modern Citizenship 1 Natives and Foreigners under the Old Regime In 1611 a group of Wallachian boyars, led by the mare stolnic (High Steward) Bărcan of Merișani, plotted the assassination of the ruling Prince Radu Mihnea (r. 1611–1616). The attack was intended as retaliation for the fact that Radu Mihnea “surrounded them with numerous Greeks from Istanbul and Rumeli,” as a local chronicler reported.1 The plot was soon discovered by the Prince, who decapitated Bărcan along with eight other great boyars. This dramatic episode—the first instance in the Principalities’ history when “blood was spilled because of the Greeks,” as the historian A. D. Xenopol put it—marked the outbreak of what, in retrospect, Romantic historiography would term the “Greek Question” in Moldavia and Wallachia.2 Over the next two centuries (1611–1821), this “question” unfolded as a succession of violent anti-Greek plots, uprisings and legal campaigns by the local nobility and merchants against the unchecked political penetration and dominance of Ottoman Greeks. After the initial 1611 plot, a second major anti-Greek uprising took place during the reign of Alexandru Iliaș (r. 1616–1618); a third under Alexandru Coconul (r. 1623–1627); a fourth under Leon Tomșa (r. 1629–1632); a fifth under Matei Basarab (r. 1632–1654); a sixth under Radu Leon (r. 1664–1669); a seventh under Nicolae Mavrocordat (r. 1716–1717); and, finally, an eighth under Ioan Gheorghe Caragea (r. 1812–1818). This last uprising culminated with the 1821 failed coop- eration and eventual conflict between Tudor Vladimirescu and the Greek un- derground organization Philiki Hetaireia (Society of Friends), leading to the end of Phanariot rule.
  • The Remaking of the Dacian Identity in Romania and the Romanian Diaspora

    The Remaking of the Dacian Identity in Romania and the Romanian Diaspora

    THE REMAKING OF THE DACIAN IDENTITY IN ROMANIA AND THE ROMANIAN DIASPORA By Lucian Rosca A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of George Mason University in Partial Fulfillment of The Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts Sociology Committee: ___________________________________________ Director ___________________________________________ ___________________________________________ ___________________________________________ Department Chairperson ___________________________________________ Dean, College of Humanities and Social Sciences Date: _____________________________________ Fall Semester 2015 George Mason University, Fairfax, VA The Remaking of the Dacian Identity in Romania and the Romanian Diaspora A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts at George Mason University By Lucian I. Rosca Bachelor of Arts George Mason University, 2015 Director: Patricia Masters, Professor Department of Sociology Fall Semester 2015 George Mason University Fairfax, VA ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank my thesis coordinators: Professor Patricia Masters, Professor Dae Young Kim, Professor Lester Kurtz, and my wife Paula, who were of invaluable help. Fi- nally, thanks go out to the Fenwick Library for providing a clean, quiet, and well- equipped repository in which to work. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page List of Tables................................................................................................................... v List of Figures ...............................................................................................................
  • 153 Burebista Şi Războiul Civil De La Roma

    153 Burebista Şi Războiul Civil De La Roma

    BUREBISTA ŞI RĂZBOIUL CIVIL DE LA ROMA (49-45 A. CHR.) CONSIDERAŢII ASUPRA RELAŢIILOR POLITICE CU CNAEUS POMPEIUS Radu OTA* Una dintre problemele foarte interesante ale domniei lui Burebista este legată de relaţiile politico-diplomatice avute cu Republica romană. Acest aspect al domniei ne-a trezit interesul pentru că evenimentele respective au fost interpretate destul de unitar, mai ales de istoriografia de dinainte de 1989, cu mici excepţii. Numeroşi istorici care s-au ocupat de această perioadă au încercat să supradimensioneze personalitatea regelui în context european. De-a lungul timpului s-a încercat discutarea unor aspecte privind originea regelui, modul în care a realizat cuceririle, tipul de stat creat (dacă putem vorbi despre un stat în adevăratul sens al cuvântului), capitala sau centrul de reşedinţă al regelui, durata domniei, existenţa unor instituţii şi, nu în ultimul rând, întinderea regatului său pe care unii l-au numit „imperiu”1. Am constatat că nu s-a ajuns la un consens în ceea ce priveşte toate aceste probleme ridicate de domnia lui Burebista. Am ales să reanalizăm tratativele regelui get din poziţii uşor diferite faţă de ceea ce s-a scris până acum, în scopul de a încerca un nou tip de abordare a istoriei politice a dinaştilor daci. De asemenea, vom expune şi analiza toate teoriile emise de-a lungul timpului cu privire la acest subiect pentru a ne face o imagine cât mai clară asupra acestor evenimente văzute prin ochii specialiştilor. Pentru început vom prezenta şi analiza pe scurt realităţile politice petrecute între anii 89-50 a. Chr. legate de politicile expansioniste ale Romei, dar şi ale lui Burebista, iar apoi vom trece la subiectul care ne interesează.
  • Result of the Historic Evolution and Contemporary Urban Planning Tool

    Result of the Historic Evolution and Contemporary Urban Planning Tool

    ROMANIAN REVIEW OF REGIONAL STUDIES, Volume XII, Number 1, 2016 BUILT HERITAGE IN THE LAND OF HAȚEG – RESULT OF THE HISTORIC EVOLUTION AND CONTEMPORARY URBAN PLANNING TOOL GHEORGHE-GAVRILĂ HOGNOGI1, ANA-MARIA POP2 ABSTRACT – The Regional Geography papers, especially those dedicated to the “land”-type studies sequentially mention certain historical aspects, because historical evolution is treated largely as having a supportive role, far from becoming a component of interaction. This research aims to address the historical evolution of the Land of Hațeg in the light of the specific territorial elements and to provide evidence for using the built heritage as a tool for decision-makers. Methodologically, the research has implied the completion of three stages, each with its specific work methods (direct observation, mapping, chorematic analysis). The findings highlight the applicative and utilitarian character of historical studies in the land use planning documents. Keywords: Land of Hațeg, historical monument, land use planning, chorem INTRODUCTION Over the last decades, the emphasis is increasingly being placed on interdisciplinarity, regardless of the type of study addressed. This is also the case of the Regional Geography papers, where the interrelations between various territorial components argue its functionality (Cocean, 2011). In addition, although historical studies have been regulated since the 1990’s as components of the urban planning documents, they are currently not mandatory. For this reason, they are often not included. They were left at the discretion of beneficiaries who considered they did not have much impact due to the fact that many of them contained only a brief history not related to other elements of a planning document.
  • 165 Years of Roman Rule on the Left Bank of the Danube. at The

    165 Years of Roman Rule on the Left Bank of the Danube. at The

    92 Chapter III PROVINCIA DACIA AUGUSTI: 165 years of Roman rule on the left bank of the Danube. At the beginning of the 2nd century, in the Spring of 101AD, Roman Forces marched against the Kingdom of Decebal. We already know what the Roman's rationale was for starting this war and we also know that the real reason was likely to have been the personal ambition of the first Provincial Emperor, Trajan (he was born in Hispania a man of Macedonian background among Greeks). The Roman armies marched against a client-state of Rome, which was a subordinate ally of Rome. Decebal did not want to wage war against Rome and his recurring peace offers confirm this. It is unlikely that Trajan would only have decided on the total conquest of the Dacian Kingdom after he waged his first campaign in 101-102. After this, Roman garrisons were established in the Province - their ongoing presence is reflected by the Latin names of towns (as recorded by Ptolemy). At Dobreta they begin to build the stone bridge which will span the Danube. It was built in accordance with plans made by Apollodorus of Damascus to promote continuous traffic - it was an accomplishment unmatched - even by Rome. This vast project portends that Trajan began the expedition against Dacia in 101 with the intention of incorporating the Kingdom into the Roman Empire. The Emperor, who founded a city (Nicopolis) to commemorate his victory over Dacia, has embarked on this campaign not only for reasons of personal ambition. The 93 economic situation of the Empire was dismal at the beginning of Trajan's reign; by the end of the second Dacian War it has vastly improved.
  • Frontiers of Romania: Nationalism and the Ideological Space of the Roman Limes

    Frontiers of Romania: Nationalism and the Ideological Space of the Roman Limes

    Print: ISBN 978-1-78491-763-0 Online: ISSN 2531-8810 EX NOVO Journal of Archaeology, Volume 2, December 2017: 63-83 63 Published Online: Dec 2017 Frontiers of Romania: Nationalism and the Ideological Space of the Roman Limes Emily R. Hanscam Dept. of Archaeology, Durham University Abstract Modern Romania is a nation-state containing space which has long been considered marginal - first as part of the Roman Empire and now within the European Union. The national narrative of Romania highlights this liminality, focusing on the interactions between the Romans and the local Dacians on the northeastern border regions of the Empire. Romania still contains significant material remnants of the Iron Age, including the Roman Limes, a series of fortifications on the Danube River meant to protect the Roman borders. As such, the archaeological tradition of this geographic space is heavily entangled with Romania’s identity as a frontier region. This paper outlines the formation of Romanian national space, focusing on the period between the seventeenth century and 1918. It considers the relationship between the materiality of the Roman Limes and ideological frontiers in Romania, examining the role of archaeology in the sustainment of the Romanian nation space. Keywords: Romania, Frontiers, Roman Limes, Ideological Space, Nationalism Introduction The foundation of the Romanian nation-state in the nineteenth century was a declaration that the intellectual elite of southeast Europe chose to orient themselves towards the West rather than the Ottoman East. Romania (Figs. 1, 2) achieved international recognition of political sovereignty in 1881, escaping subjugation by the Austro-Hungarian Empire and the Russian Empire as well as the Ottomans.
  • FRONTIER IDENTITIES Roman Villa and Settlement Excavation and Survey

    FRONTIER IDENTITIES Roman Villa and Settlement Excavation and Survey

    LIFE BY THE IMPERIAL ROAD - FRONTIER IDENTITIES Roman Villa and Settlement Excavation and Survey IDENTITY AND WEALTH: ROMAN PROVINCIAL LANDSCAPE STRATEGIES Rapolt, Transylvania, Romania June 7 - July 4; July 20 - August 1, 2020 During the Roman colonial occupation, southern Transylvania shows a very dynamic and intensive synthesis of Roman provincial life, where a multitude of processes of colonization and creolization take place side by side. Prior to the Roman conquest of 102AD, it was also the most densely populated region of the Dacian Kingdoms. Our project seeks to explore the integration of all the structural provincial elements present along the main Roman axes of communication and transport. Our research area is in the immediate proximity of both the imperial road and the Mures River, the extremely important gold deposits of the Carpathian Gold Moutains, and the political and military centers of Sarmizegetusa Ulpia Traiana and Apulum. We will continue the excavation of the well preserved structures, including a villa rustica of palatial size, identified during our 2013-2019 field seasons. Our 2020 excavation and survey will aim at understanding the importance and impact of the proximity of the main axis of movement, communication and commerce on the Roman provincial rural life, and its evolution through time, as well as the local processes of identity creation. Our participants will participate to the villa excavation, geochemical and geophysical survey, Duration: 4 week sessions STP survey and laboratory analysis. This Costs: US$1695 for each 4-week session extraordinary environment with its associated It includes: monuments and material culture, combined with excavation registration, taxes, fees lectures and spectacular surrounding natural landscapes and most gear beautiful Transylvanian churches and castles, housed as guests of Romanian families in a guarantees all students and volunteers with a highly beautiful traditional Transylvanian village full room and board, Monday-Friday rewarding archaeological and cultural experience.
  • Pag 289-308 Damyanov

    Pag 289-308 Damyanov

    TALANTA XXXVI-XXXVII (2004-2005) NOTES ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF ODESSOS AND ITS VICINITY UNTIL EARLY HELLENISTIC TIMES Supplementum Ponticum 3 Margarit Damyanov This article is an attempt to trace the development of a small part of the pres - ent-day Bulgarian Black Sea coast from 6th to the 3rd century BC, i.e. from the beginning of the Greek colonisation up till Early Hellenistic times, and more precisely the changes in the latter period. This article covers the area from Odessos and its immediate vicinity to Cape Kaliakra in the northeast. Along this part of the littoral there are a few ancient sites that are related to the Greek colonisation in this area. This is first of all Odessos (present-day Varna), the earliest apoikia in the region. To the northeast are Dionysopolis (Balchik), Bizone (Kavarna) and Tirizis (Kaliakra). Each one of these sites is specific on its own. It is necessary to begin with the chronology of the Greek colonisation. The foundation of Odessos does not raise significant problems. According to Pseudo-Skymnos the city was founded by Milesians when Astyages ruled the Medes ( Ps-Skymnos 748-750). From the two alternative reigns of Astyages – 598/7–560 BC (Eusebius and Hieronymus) or 584–549 BC (Herodotus) – the latter is more likely, as in the last analysis on that matter, K. Boshnakov pro - posed a foundation date for Odessos in the time from 584 to 575 BC, when the Medes made war against the Lydian kingdom (Boshnakov 2004, 179- 181). Archaeological finds confirm a date in the second quarter of the 6th cen - tury BC (Lazarov 1998, 91; Minchev 2003, 213-214).
  • The Lower Danube in Pages of History and Literature

    The Lower Danube in Pages of History and Literature

    2nd International Conference - Water resources and wetlands. 11-13 September, 2014 Tulcea (Romania); Available online at http://www.limnology.ro/water2014/proceedings.html Editors: Petre Gâştescu ; Włodzimierz Marszelewski ; Petre Bretcan; ISSN: 2285-7923; Pages: 577-583; Open access under CC BY-NC-ND license ; THE LOWER DANUBE IN PAGES OF HISTORY AND LITERATURE Elena Teodoreanu Ecological University of Bucharest, Bd. Lascar Catargiu nr. 24-26, sc.A. ap. 16, Bucuresti, Romania, Email [email protected] Abstract The paper examines some information on the Danube River in their lower part, from ancient historians, from Romanian chroniclers and Turkish chroniclers who accompanied the troops when attacking Romanian countries. Also we have the data reported by foreign travelers on Romanian territory, of which with the passage of time, are more numerous: Polish, Austrians and Hungarians diplomats, Catholic priests. For example we have interesting data from Syrian traveler Paul of Aleppo or Turkish chronicler Evlia Celebi. The information refers specifically to periods of overflow of the Danube and damaging floods, or droughts when shrinking waters could and river goes on foot. Most data refer to periods when the Danube froze strong, especially in the centuries that constituted the Little Ice Age (approximately Fourteenth century until the mid- nineteenth century) opportunity for the Ottoman armies crossed the Danube on the ice, to plunder the territories of north of the Danube. Finally, it presents some descriptions of Romanian writers who loved Danube swamps, delta, among which Mihail Sadoveanu and George Topârceanu. Keywords: Lower Danube, ancient historians, foreign travelers, Turkish chroniclers, Romanian writers “Wherever you would see it in this country the Danube is (…) like a human being who has seen and suffered much and his face showing all the scars left by his struggles.” George Vâlsan 1.